Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20041235 Ver 1_Staff Comments_20090309RE: Privateer Farms Bank Site A J Subject: RE: Privateer Farms Bank Site From: "Paugh, Leilani Y" <lpaugh@ncdot.gov> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:11:55 -0400 To: "Sugg, Mickey T SAW" <Mickey.T.Sugg@saw02.usace.army.mil> CC: "smtp-Cox, David" <coxdr@mai1.wildlife. state.nc.us>, "matthews.kathy@epamail.epa.gov" <matthews.kathy@epamail.epa.gov>, Eric Kulz <eric.kulz@ncmail.net>, Tammy Hill <Tammy.L.Hill@ncmail.net>, "howard_hall@fws.gov" <howard_hall@fws.gov>, "Ellwood, Molly M." <molly.ellwood@ncwildlife.org>, "ron.sechler@noaa.gov" <ron.sechler@noaa.gov>, "McLendon, Scott C SAW" <Scott.C.McLendon@saw02.usace. army. mil>, "Lekson, David M SAW" <David.M.Lekson@usace.army. mil> I have attached the information from the three vegetation plots on the Privateer site that had lower stems/acre than the other plots. Logan Williams and Karen Lynch surveyed the plots. The species is listed, with their classification, and the approximate percent coverage of the plot. Their disclaimer is this was a winter survey and some species are difficult to confirm without fruit or blooms. We are plotting the surveys of the road area and will forward soon. From: Sugg, Mickey T SAW [mailto:Mickey.T.Sugg@saw02.usace.army. mill Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 11:09 AM To: Paugh, Leilani Y Cc: smtp-Cox, David; matthews.kathy@epamail.epa.gov; Eric Kulz; Tammy Hill; howard_hall@fws.gov; molly.ellwood@ncwildlife.org; ron.sechler@noaa.gov; McLendon, Scott C SAW; Lekson, David M SAW Subject: RE: Privateer Farms Bank Site Good morning, hope your Christmas and New Years Holiday was relaxing- For the information below, please provide a response at least 2 weeks prior to the Feb. 12 NC IRT meeting if you are planning to discuss Privateer that day. The members and I need at least that amount of time to review and prepare for discussion. If you are unable to have the information by that time, we can coordinate via e-mail & phone if necessary. There is nothing that states we have to save our discussions for designated IRT meetings only. Also, I would like to visit the site on Feb. 3rd if possible (along with any member who would like to see it). Just let me know if that date is a possibility. For the signatories, Scott is tracting that down and will provide it to you since the UMBI will include all your sites. Thanks, Mickey Mickey Sugg, Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington NC 28403-1343 (910) 251-4811 (o) (910) 251-4025 (fax) The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/ to complete the survey online. 1 of 3 4/9/2009 5:35 PM RE: Privateer Farms Bank Site w From: Paugh, Leilani Y [maiIto: lpaugh@ncdot.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 10:52 AM To: Sugg, Mickey T SAW Cc: David Cox; matthews.kathy@epamail.epa.gov; Eric Kulz; Tammy Hill; howard_hall@fws.gov; molly.ellwood@ncwildlife.org; smtp-Sechler, Ron; McLendon, Scott C SAW; Lekson, David M SAW Subject: RE: Privateer Farms Bank Site Thanks Mickey I also need the name and title of each agency's signatory on the UMBI, except Kathy who already sent hers. Have a Merry Christmas. LeiLani From: Sugg, Mickey T SAW [maiIto: Mickey.T.Sugg@saw02.usace.army.mi1] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:56 AM To: Paugh, Leilani Y Cc: David Cox; matthews.kathy@epamail.epa.gov; Eric Kulz; Tammy Hill; howard_hall@fws.gov; molly.ellwood@ncwildlife.org; ron.sechler@noaa.gov; McLendon, Scott C SAW; Lekson, David M SAW Subject: Privateer Farms Bank Site Good morning- I wanted to provide a summary of the major comments discussed during the Dec. 2 IRT meeting. a) GSA- I don't think there is any reluctance by the team members for extending the GSA into 03030004 provided that the sandhills and upper parts (out of kind communities in Lee & Harnett) are excluded. Also, need to cut off the lower 03030005 near Pender & New Hanover Cos. We also agree that there is room to expand into 03030006 (Sampson County). What ever DOT's suggested GSA, please include a written justification (hydrologically-looking at the 14 digit HUC, community types, etc.. ) on how you established the boundaries. b) Credit accounting- provide an updated ledger on what has been used and what is remaining. In EEP's comments, they state that many of the Privateer "credits have already been debited and applied to historical permits or sold to other mitigation programs, or are not expected to be available after consideration of NCDOT within Cataloging Unit mitigation needs under the Tri-Party MOA". Please clarify what has and has not been used and provide us with an accounting breakdown. c) Confirm that DOT holds the easement and provide documentation. d) Current Monitoring and credit release- As you know, there are some concerns with parts of the site not meeting the success criteria (SC). In a quick review of the past three monitoring reports, veg. plots 11, 13, & 14 didn't meet the SC and some of the wells have falling short. Reports stated Yr. (1)- 9 of 15 wells met SC, Yr. (2)- 14-15 wells met SC, & Yr. (3) 5 of 15 wells met SC. When the credit release is being evaluated, please keep in mind that a certain amount of credits will be withheld for monitoring years 1, 2, & 3 until the IRT/MBRT is fully satisfied that all the areas have met the SC. For the three veg plots that are failing, I would recommend sampling the volunteer species to help determine if the plots need to be replanted. With input from the IRT, full credit can be given for native volunteer species within plots (when appropriate) regardless of the failure of the planted species. If the volunteers are not desirable, then DOT needs to development an adaptive management plan for those failing plots in order to receive full credit. Additionally, on all future monitoring reports, please clearly state the success criteria. e) Adjacent Farmland- I understand that the remaining portions of the surrounding ag lands will be converted to wetlands via Wetland Reserve Program. I realize that DOT is unable to control what the adjacent property owners may undertake, but I do think it is imperative for the team to have any information if its available. 2 of 3 4/9/2009 5:35 PM RE: Privateer Farms Bank Site I I would also strongly recommend that DOT state that the bank site will be used for NCDOT project, but may be used for non-NCDOT projects. I think that is beneficial for two reasons 1) It's clearly stated in the MBI or addendum, and will not cause any confusion and/or having to rewrite it later if need be, especially if these credits will be available into the distant future, and 2) if DOT does decide to use it for non-hwy projects, the non-DOT project managers and resource agencies will know that credits are available for private use during permit reviews and they can instruct the applicants appropriately. Lastly, I would like to set up a time to visit Privateer sometime late Jan./early Feb. since I've never been there. I'm probably the only one that hasn't seen the site. I'll call you after Christmas to set up a time. Merry Christmas to ya', -Mickey Mickey Sugg, Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington NC 28403-1343 (910) 251-4811 (o) (910) 251-4025 (fax) The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/ to complete the survey online. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Content-Description: Privateer Farm vegetation plots.doc Privateer Farm vegetation plots.doc Content-Type: Content-Encoding: application/msword base64 3 of 3 4/9/2009 5:35 PM 3 monitoring plots checked for plant species 2/25/09 K.M. Lynch, J.L. Willians Plot #14 Polygonum (densiflorum?) OBL 80% Eupatorium capillifolium FACU 10% Scirpus cyperinus OBL 5% Baccharis halimifolia FAC 2% Solidago (fistulosa?) FAC+ 2% Carex sp. (need fruit to id) 2% Plot # 13 Polygonum (densiflorum?) OBL 30% Eupatorium capillifolium FACU 20% Scirpus cyperinus OBL 5% Baccharis halimifolia FAC 2% Solidago (fistulosa?) FAC+ 50% Carex sp. (need fruit to id) 15% Acer rubrum FACW 4 saplings Plot # 11 Polygonum (densiflorum?) OBL 20% Eupatorium capillifolium FACU 30% Scirpus cyperinus OBL 5% Baccharis halimifolia FAC 5% Solidago (fistulosa?) FAC+ 60% Carex sp. (need fruit to id) 5% Rubus argutus FAC 5%