20040325 Ver 1_401 Application_20040305

ywnd_l? ??? 5wcq?, Jnc.
SP, g .wald.,o -
TO: Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
961 d 6 Ax 2522
ftminptm, SoWA %6dma 28402
Jed N0-45.2-0009
March 4, 2004
RE: 401 Water Quality Certification Application
Barra Farms Cape Fear Regional Mitigation Bank, Phase II
Dear John:
040326
.T..w /e U? Ce ?auc
9805 V#*" .
'Wdmi,W",.M 28403
V1?ETLANOS ,I",,>P
MAR 5 2004
MATER QUWII?y SECTION
Enclosed is a 401 Water Quality Certification application for your review. This application
is submitted on behalf of Ecosystems Land Mitigation Bank Corporation (ECOBANK) for the
restoration, enhancement, and preservation of 1,812 acres of pocosin and pine flatwood habitat in
Cumberland County, NC for use as a mitigation bank. This project proposes filling 6.67 acres of
ditches that have been classified as `Waters of the U.S.' in order to restore groundwater
hydrology. The mitigation plan for this project is currently in the final stages of MBRT review.
Seven copies of the Pre-Construction Notification form, associated maps, site plan, and
DRAINMOD analysis are enclosed for your review. In addition, I have enclosed the $200
application fee. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance with
this project.
Sincerely,
?,?
Kim Williams
Wetlands Scientist
Encl.
Cc: Mr. Ken Averitte, DWQ
Dr. Alan Fickett, ECOBANK
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 27; GC 3399
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information WETLANDS/ 401 rRoUp
1. Owner/Applicant Information MAR 5 2004
Name: ECOBANK c/o Mr. Bill Gerber
Mailing Address: - 1555 Howell -Branch Rd:_#0200 WATER QUAL414
Winter Park. FL 32789
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Ms. Kim Williams
Company Affiliation: Land Management Group, Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2522
Wilmington, NC 28402
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: kwilliams(a)lmgroup.net
Page 5 of 5
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Barra Farms Cape Fear Regional Mitigation Bank; Phase II
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Cumberland Nearest Town: Fayetteville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Wilmington, take 74/76 W
to 87 N to 701/242 N. Follow 242 N. Turn left onto 210 and travel approximately 10 miles.
Turn left onto Doe Hill Rd. Site will be on left (see vicinity map).
- ---5: --Site coordinates;-if available (UTNI or Lat/Long): 34° 56' 13"N - 78° 41'48" W -
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 1,812 acres
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Harrison Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin -
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: This site contains a mixture of agricultural fields and
silvicultural stands. Over 125,400 linear feet of ditches run through the property. Ad'al cent
land use is mostly agriculture or silviculture production.
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Site preparation consists of urg bbing and herbicide application of former agricultural fields.
Ditches will then be backfilled to restore wetland hydrology and earthen berms will be
installed to prevent. gully erosion. Finally, vegetation will be planted in unforested areas. This
project is currently under final MBRT review.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The ap lip cant proposes to restore, enhance, and
preserve wetlands throughout the tract for use as a mitigation bank.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer. impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No permits have been previously requested for the project area. The extent of 404 wetlands were
determined through DRAINMOD analysis drainage effect of ditches). The DRAINMOD
analysis was approved by Mr. Mickey Sugg; of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and is
included in this application.
V. Future Project Plans
--Are-anyfuture -permit-requests anticipated-for this-project? If so,-describe the-anticipated-work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The applicant proposes to fill 6.67
acres of ditches that have been classified as `Waters of the U.S.'
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
feet)
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 836 ac
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below: N/A
Stream Impact
Site Number
_(indicate _on_map)__
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
_(linear feet)_
Stream Name**
_______ Average Width
of Stream
Before-Impact. Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)__
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
Page 8 of 8
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact

(acres Name
(if applicable) Wate) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound'

bay, ocean, etc.

l Backfill ditches; install
earthen berms
6.67
N/A
Ditches (Waters of the U.S.)

List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections.. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Proposed impacts to the Waters of the U.S. are necessary to restore and enhance pocosin and
pine flatwood habitat within the Cape Fear River Basin. The project will reestablish the water
table at pre-ditch elevations and enhance the survivabilily of planted tree and shrub species.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 9
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to.review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
littp://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because the purpose of this project is to restore, enhance, and preserve wetlands for use as a
mitigation bank, no compensatory mitigation is offered.
-----:-- Mitigation -tnay-also _be made by--payment -into the North-Carolina Wetlands _Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at hitp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/in.dex.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ) N/A
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
- --- -Yes ? `No- M - - _ -- -- If you answered "yes";provide the following-information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
'Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
l
2
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Page 11 of 12
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
One small residence and two sheds (< 2000 ft2 currently exist along the eastern property
boundary. No new impervious cover is proposed. Silt fences, earthen berms, and check dams (at
outlet locations) will be installed to minimize runoff to downstream waters. A Sedimentation and
Erosion Control Plan is currently being developed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from this project.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
< VvVVV_- ?/?/?
. Applicant/Agent's Signature Date '
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
MAR,-03'04(WED) 12:17 ECOBANK TEL:[phone] P. 002
910 452 0060 ; Mar-';1-04 12:121"M' 1-''ire 2/2
Senl By: LAND MANAGEMENT;
AGENT DISCLOSURE FORM
TONH.UM IT MAY CONCERN:
Vwe, t11 undersigned, hereby authorize hand Management Group, Inc. to act as our agent in tho
preparat on and representation of information related to the permit application for the Harra
Farms C pe Pear Regional Mitigation Bank, Phase II in Cumberland County, N'('. All questions
In regards to this project should be directed to Lead Management Group, Inc.
Sincerely,
rao, F: ysf.-Otis Lamed ??•fi?,kfir?,
lC Grjr?Dy?t ??
O dApph'cunt
3 1'04-
Date
1 r \( ss
F
j
-vopq $} t ;? ,tom
A j
O 4`
9 ,
` 4 t r / ?C
41, Y,
C 1 a
111 _ \ ((
/t \ a
r 1 `.
.: x
n
s r
SCALE 1" = 2.4 miles
Barra Farms Cape Fear Regional
Mitigation Bank, Phase II
Cumberland County, NC
NWP 27 Application
ECOBANK
Land Management Group, Inc.
March 2004
' I Figure 1. Vicinity map.

CAI ?'

i
.

l
£ ??? ih rat
l >

- '
gri
fA f
f

Xr
I

i t
.
5 1
-
-

13 't

Barra Farms I Mitigation Bank
Barra Farms Cape Fear Regional
Mitigation Bank, Phase II
Cumberland County, NC
NWP 27 Application
ECOBANK
Land Management Group, Inc.
March 2004
SCALE I" = 3000'
Figure 2. USGS topographic
map. Site located within
the Autryville quad.
V R A L .
Ay?
Tl?
+E rrt
CT f¢i... 1¢ f '
TR L./rEEC]
A,A
48
?. \1 li Ra
I V+a
a
C
nU4
Pa ?I
tR
tR, -
. Cab
E<A
p,i J / TR 3, i 1 •v ? ,c i ? i O
??? \ f f r -</Y # u t?A
?,?, ? wit J SI a ... € b ? `t ,y 'J?1 }r ? S7. ?.•
C-31 f? i non c
A:A TN _.JT
'It TR
Barra Farms I Mitigation Bank
SCALE 1" = 3000'
Barra Farms Cape Fear Regional
Mitigation Bank, Phase II
Cumberland County, NC
NWP 27 Application
ECOBANK
Land Management Group, Inc.
March 2004
Figure 3. SCS soil survey
for Cumberland County.
ai
4°
i?.
0 0
C) .?
o ?
M to
W ?
T ? of f f ?`?0
i
J
\\ \`\\ `? ??\ ` .19
Ei
M W
rA 4-a
r ? 1 is V
? `1 00 d N ??C//? r?l
d
? rig C? ?^ p ? ,?I v p N
7 'i p ?M c?i
tat 0
• T1 f?i W QI "C? ~ ? N 'pA'"'i U
°u v v °' ? .? ? cam ? ?
C? YE '' U c?
a a a a, x w o y o y
ILI
w
H
0
Z
3
,fir+j? S? ??:' • N' ? ? ? ? ?Z
e
n t Ll ? 4 ? ,) XhT
w.

? r ? 7?x ? ? • t ?y
its
s s
4, 4,
?1 a i s !'
!i !IN
E•
-. -- -.Y_ ._...... ..... ........ r...__.. .. _ .......v.
1^
[r
d
y
Im Asa
i
s
^P i
T4
y 3
NC

c.
LEGEND
Ditches classified as `Waters of the US' to be filled (6.67 ac)
Ditches through PC lands to be filled
Ditch to remain
Property Boundary
--- Existing Roads
Barra Farms Cape Fear Regional
Mitigation Bank, Phase II
Cumberland County, NC
NWP 27 Application
Barra Farms Phase I
ECOBANK
Land Management Group, Inc.
March 2004
SCALE V = 2000'
Figure 6. Site plan showing ditches to be filled,
210
c(]±?^W/tom/ 5WMA,
?? 1/1? ? ?9Cb92.cS2:l%C?C!//(DLO
?at? ??ce ,?ax ,252,2
WWm&i#m, J&W4 lJaw&n Z 28402
gel- 590-452-0001

DATE: August 15, 2002
gak
,9805
Vd.i, t , M 28403
SUBJECT-. Land & soils evaluation and hydrologic drainage study of Barra-II (1110 acres)
within the Barra Farms Tract to determine potential 404 Wetland areas vs Drained-
Altered Wetland areas. Tract located within Harrison Creek Bay, south of NC Hwy
210 & NCSR 2033 intersection, Cedar Creek area, Cumberland County, North
Carolina.
. .... .... _ ._ -------__ _--_(UTM 177710519 E;-_3868292 _--
TO: ECOBANK
Mr. Alan Fickett
1555 Howell Branch Road, Suite C-2
Winter Park, FL 32789
[phone]; [phone]; 629-6044 [fx]
INTRODUCTION -
The lands of BarraA (1110 acres) within the Barra Farms Tract were evaluated and inventoried
to determine general soil/land types, drainage alterations, and their locations. Soil
characterization, present drainage conditions, and general geohydrologic conditions were also
used as inputs for a computer modeling drainage study ("DrainMod v.5.0). The results of these
evaluations were compiled to determine the degree of historic drainage alterations to the site, and
to determine potential areas that appear to function hydrologically as potential 404 Wetlands,
versus those areas that should not meet the hydrologic criteria to be defined as 404 Wetlands.
LAND & SOILS EVALUATION
Barra-[I is a portion of the Barra Farms Tract which is within southeastern Cumberland County,
North Carolina (see general USGS topo and USDA soil maps). The general area's
geomorphology. is characterized by organic "Carolina Bays", sandy uplands, and slightly incised
black-water streams. The Barra-if study site is within a relatively large Carolina Bay named
"Harrison Creek Bay". The elevation of this entire area -varies between -120 to -125 feet amsl
(see USGS topo map). Thus, topography is predominantly level (0-2% slopes): with very slight
undulations from edges of the bay rims. The Barra-11 study site is situated within the interior
portions of the Carolina Bay with 0-1 % slopes.
Natural drainage of the general area is by rapid permeability through sandy upland areas to a
concave organic "Carolina Bay", where permeability and water movement slows. Barra-[I's natural
drainage and water movement appears to be in a south to southwest direction towards an un-
named tributary that has truncated the southwest edge of the bay. Agricultural and silvicultural
drainage improvements have been historically established within portions of the study site. This
drainage consists of +2-4 ft deep lateral open ditching on -300 ft spacing, which connect to 4-7
ft deep collector drainage canals. All of the artificial drainage drains is in a southwest direction
Page 1 oT
to an outlet canal with a water.control structure. Portions of Barra-11's original hydrology has been
altered to various degrees where the historic ditching exists (see Barra-11 map showing existing
roads & ditching).
Evaluations of the Barra-it site confirmed the USDA-SCS mapping to be representative of the soil
types within the site being studied. The enclosed USDA-SCS soils map shows the major soil type
areas found within this area (see enclosed USDA-SCS soils map). The following is a brief
discussion of the major land & soil type areas found within the 1110 acre tract evaluated:
The "CT" Soil Areas (see SCS soils map & description) predominate within the study area. In
their natural state, they consist of very poorly drained organic soils of "Croatan". These soils
typically have an organic (+20% o.m.) surface and subsurface to +2-3 ft depths, where loamy sand
to sandy loam substratums are encountered (see enclosed USDA-SCS data). These land types
in their natural state have 404 Wetland hydric soil and vegetative characteristics, but significant
areas have been altered through prescription drainage improvements.
The "TR" Soil Areas (see SCS soils map) are minor and within the perimeter of the study area.
in their natural state, they consist of very poorly drained mineral soils of "Torhunta". These soils
typically have an organic 1+20% o.m.) surface and subsurface to <1-2 ftdepths, where loamy sand
to sandy loam substratums are encountered. These land types in their natural state have 404
.._ 1N_etlandhvdric soil_and_veoetatLve_characteristics, but significant areas have been altered through
prescription drainage improvements.
The "Le" Soil Areas (see SCS soils map) are minor within the study area. In their natural state,
they consist of somewhat poorly to poorly drained soils of "Leon". These soils typically have a thin
surface horizon over sandy substratums with hardpans or spodic horizons. These land types in
their natural state have non-hydric 404 Wetland soil and vegetative characteristics, and typically
would be classified as uplands.
The "Pa" Soil Areas (see SCS soils map) are minor within the study area. In their natural state,
they consist of moderately well to somewhat poorly drained soils of "Pactolus". These soils
typically have a very thin surface horizon over sandy substratums. These land types in their
natural state have non-hydric 404 Wetland soil and vegetative characteristics, and typically would
be classified as uplands.
DRAINAGE & HYDROLOGIC MODELING
A hydrologic analysis and drainage modeling were performed to determine which areas of the
Barra-II Tract should or should not meet 404 Wetland hydrologic criteria. This is principally within
the bay areas of the tract where there is +2 to 7 ft deep historic open ditching. In order to assess
which portions of these tracts currently do or do not meet the hydrologic criteria to be defined as
jurisdictional 404 Wetlands, the soil, site, and drainage parameters were simulated using the
"DrainMod" hydrologic computer model; developed by R.W. Skaggs'- NCSU-MRCS version 5.0.
This hydrologic drainage model is one of the latest computer simulations to evaluate drainage and
its' impacts within an area.
Various DrainMod analysis were performed using the known and representative site characteristic
inputs to run various scenarios that reflect the various drainage depths and. existing drainage
patterns that occur across the tract. The DrainMod model is capable of querying the results to
determine the time periods and durations & depths of seasonal saturation from the ground surface
to determine those areas that would meet the minimum hydrologic criteria to be hydrolocally
defined or not defined as jurisdictional 404 Wetlands. All units within the models are in
centimeters, hours, and days. All "Drain Mod" modeling analysis were ran for a 31 yeartime period
1951-1981 using Wilmington, NC climatological data which is quite similarto Cumberland County's
rainfall periods, evapotranspirational rates, and.temperatures (see enclosed Cumberland & New
Hanover County climatological date). The 404 Wetland hydrologic parameters for Cumberland
Page 2 of 5
County, NC are soil saturation at depths <12" from the surface, for +12 consecutive days during
the "growing season" which is March 17h thru Nov 12th (5% of growing season @>28° F; a 240
day time period).
The following DrainMod inputs were used in the wetlands analysis for the Barra-II Tract with
Croatan soil/land types.
Climate Data = Wilmington, NC climatological data
Time Period Analyzed = Years 1951 thru 1981
Annual Start/End Time = Day 76 and Day 316
Depth To Saturation = 30.5 cm (12")
Ditch Spacings Evaluated = 300 ft (9144 cm spacing)
400 ft (12194 cm spacing)
460 ft (14021 cm spacing)
510 ft (15545 cm spacing)
Ditch Depths Evaluated = 2 ft = . 61 cm
3 ft = 76 cm
4 ft = 107 cm
5ft=138 cm
6ft=183 cm
___-__Depth_Of_S_urface._P__anding 1.2 in = 3 cm__________
Surface Storage To Drain = 1.2 in = 3 cm
Depth To Impermeable Layer = 10 ft = 305 cm
Effective Drain-Radius = 7.0 - 10.0 cm
Drainage Coefficient = 5.0 cm/day
Soil Ksat Pates = "Croatan Soils" [USDA-SCS data: Used lower values]
00-15 cm (00-06"); 2.54 cm/hr (1.0 in/hr)
15-91 cm (06-36'D; 1.02 cm/hr (0.4 in/hr)
91-279.2 cm (36-110'D; 7.62 cm/hr (3.0 in/hr)
Lateral Seepage = 0 cm/hr
Vertical Seepage 0 cm/hr
Slope Seepage = 0 cm/hr
Initial Potentiometric Surface = 30 cm (beginning in year 1951)
Kirkam G-Factor =
Wetland Queries = 4.72
Watertable <30.5 cm (12"-from surface for>12 daytime period,
between day 76 and day 316.
The various runs of the model incorporate soil characteristics, precipitation, evapotranspiration,
surface storage, surface infiltration, and drainage influences on the fluctuation & duration of the
unconfined aquifers potentiometric surface. All inputs are fixed except drainage depths and
spacing. The data of each model is queried.to tell how many times over a 31 year time period the
water table is less than 12" (30.5 cm) for durations of >12 consecutive days, during the growing
season of Cumberland County, NC (March 17th thru November 12th). When >50% of the 31 years
meet these conditions (1.6 yrs out of 31 yrs), it hydrologically meets the criteria to be defined as
404 Wetlands. The enclosed data summary and graphs show these results (see Croatan
DrainMod data). =
Within Croatan" soil types of the Barra-ll Tract the following results were obtained within areas
of parallel ditch[nq:
Drainage Depths with 300 ft Spacing Number of Yrs 404 Wetland Criteria Met (%)
. 2.0 ft 21 out of 31 years (67.7%)
3.0 ft 115 out of 31 years (48.4%)
Page 3 of 5
Based upon the above results, when drainage depths are -3;0 ft or greater with parallel <300 ft
ditch spacing the 404 Wetland hydrologic criteria will not be met within these Croatan land/soil
types. Within Barra-11, the areas with parallel pattern drainage have ditch depths of >3.0 ft or are
maintained to these depths. The land areas with parallel ditching that do not meet 404 Wetland
hydrologic criteria within Barra-11 are shown on the enclosed map (see map, hydrologic drainage
conditions "white-shaded" areas).
For the collector ditching within Barra-it, which are non-parallel and/or with variable ditch depths,
DrainMod is ran several times, varying only the ditch spacing .input, to determine the lateral
drainage effects of a single ditch at a specified depth. When 404 Wetland hydrological criteria
are: not met (<50% of the 31 year time period), then Y of the ditch spacing is the lateral drainage
influence of a single ditch at the specified depth. The enclosed data summary and graphs show
these results (see Croatan DrainMod data).
Within "Croatan" soil types of the Barra-11 Tract the following results were obtained for the lateral
Hrainaae effects of single collector ditches:
Depth of Ditch.Spacing Number of Years Lateral Drainage
Collector Ditch In Model 404 Wetland Criteria Met (%) Effect in Feet
C1 Ditch Spacing)
---------- -----
4.0 ft
400 ft
15 out of 31 yrs
(48.4%)
200 ft
5.0 ft 460 ft 15 out of 31 yrs (48.4%) 230 ft
6.0 ft 510 ft i. 15 out of 31 yrs (48.4%) 255 ft
Based upon the above results, the lateral drainage effects of single collector ditches at various
depths were determined for the "Croatan" land/sod types within Barra-11. The land areas with
collector ditching that do not meet 404 Wetland hydrologic criteria within Barra-11 are shown on the
enclosed map (see map, hydrologic drainage conditions "yellow-shaded" areas).
SUMMARY
A land, soils, and hydrologic evaluation was completed to evaluate the drainage effects within the
Barra-it Tract (1100 acres). The bay areas have the hydric soil & vegetative indicators to be
defined as 404 Wetlands, but have significantly altered drainage conditions through historic, open,
parallel and collector ditching at various depths. The site was characterized through land/sods
mapping, aerial photo interpretation, qualitative determinations of soil properties, research of
existing reference materials, and "DrainMod" computer modeling. These evaluations were used
to further determine the general acreage that would or would not meet the minimum hydrologic
criteria to be defined as jurisdictional 404 Wetlands. Representative soil characterizations,
conservative hydraulic conductivity rates, and known ditch depths & spacing inputs were utilized
in the DrainMod drainage/hydrology model.
Based upon the various DrainMod models ran with the Croatan land/soil types, 404 Wetland
hydrology is not met when parallel ditch depths are 3.0 ft deep or greaterwith 300 ft spacing. Also
the lateral drainage effects of collector ditches were determined at various depths and for
conditions when 404 Wetland hydrologic criteria were not met. A final map is enclosed that shows
the areas and planimetered acreage of potential jurisdictional 404 Wetlands vs drained wetland
areas (see map "Hydrologic Drainage Conditions").
Page 4 of 5
Hydrologic 404 Wetland Status Acreage'
*************** inside Tract Outside Tract TOTAL
Non-Hydric 404 Hydrologic Conditions 315 acs 130 acs 445 acs
Based Upon DrainMod "Yellow-Shaded"
PC and Non-Hydric 404 Hydrologic
Conditions Based Upon USDA-ASCS 440 acs 0 acs 440 acs
Class & DrainMod "White-Shaded"
Meets Hydric 404 Hydrologic Conditions 355 acs ***** 355 acs
Based Upon DrainMod "Not Shaded"
TOTAL ACREAGE 1110 acs 130 acs 1240 ac
a Acreage is planimetered & approximate.
Based upon the soils evaluation and "DrainMod" hydrological analysis, there are -755 acres that
do not meet 404 Wetland hydrology criteria within the Barra-Il Tract. In addition, there are -130
acres directly adjacent to and outside of the Barra-It Tract that also do not meet 404 Wetland
--hydrology criteria:---Thus, there is a-totaY of-885 acres that-do-riot-meet-40-4-Wettand-hydro ogy--- -
that can be attributed to the historic drainage alterations within the Barra-II Tract. There are -355
acres within Barra-II that have less drainage impacts which still appears to meet 404 Wetland
This report, maps, and evaluations should be used for land planning purposes only. The U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers-EPA and NCDENR-DWQ have final regulatory authority over 404
Wetland determinations, and permitted/non-permitted activities within 404 Wetland areas.. This
information should be used as a supportive document to determine drained vs undrained
wetlands, potential jurisdictional 404 Wetland areas, and areas for possible wetland mitigation
credits within the Barra-II Tract.
Larry F. Baldwin, CPSSISC
ARCPACS #2183; NCLSS #1040
Page 5 of 5
U
H
n -
w
V (?
z o
F- 0
nZ
O
U
!!! o
JUG
C
J?
O
L
co
LLI cc
!1 O
CO
z ?.
O L
_o
N N
? L
L L
V cc
S?
t L
? U
U

-?i
0

LL
C
0 H
0
CV =
d U
C

Cl) L)
'C
?
¢k cc
O
Q c

O
N
E
J
0
N
T
y
O
ry
p
Cl)
c
x
LU
Z u N "' us
c
0 a a C O
¢ coca° C)0
lam- o cz RM:
,.
M Rm -.c3 CA
-.-ate .. .wa r
EL' 'o ? ?
_ J
CL o .
W i ?? L - L-LT
t^
I"
w
O -a - ?CO
Z r /! !: l t v 4
j =U3
K`s K
i
O
,
Z
u
n L._ -'r m tc6
?.:?.. tx 1L >
Ut m -. ,a ?? ?. 0 C cn
O r z a O O Mm- 11.
gj-
d //".' C7
cr)
U Vim. r?_' - fir. _
a? ?= -- ` -.tea.-" /? ?c ?' -?,x - - s-` O
t4 Q) r r r `a`< 1 m U
00
cl)
-- - -----= ?ARRA-= 300 -t Spacing 2 It Dept
--------------------------------------- y
DRAINMOD version 5.0
-Copyright 1990-94 North Carolina State University
--=---------------------------------------
4
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-II; Craatan soils; 2' Depth @300` Ditch Spacing
WILMINGTON, ^NC^WEATHER ^DATA ^1951-1981^TIME ^PERIOD^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ --------------
---------- RUN STATISTICS --=------- time: 8/20/2002 @ 16:34
input file: C:\Drainmod\inputs\Barra-zl.lisand yields nat calculat
parameters: free drainage
drain spacing = 9144. cm drain depth = 61.0 cm
-------------------------------- ---------------------
of periods with water table closer than 30.50 cm
for at least 12 days. Counting starts on day
76 and ends on day 316 of each year
YEAR Number of Periods
of 12 days or
more with WTD
< 30.50 cm
------------------
1951 0
1952 2.
1953 0.
1954 0.
1955 2.
1956 1.
1957 0.
1958 3.
1959 2.
1960 4.
1961 2.
1962 3.
1963 2.
1964 1:
1965 3.
1966 4.
1967 0.
1968 0.
1969 4.
1970 2.
1971 2.
1972 0.
197.3 3.
1974 2.
1975 0.
1976 0.
1977 1.
1978 0.
1979 2.
1980 1.
1981 1.
Longest consecutive
Period in Days
16.
7.
7.
25.
16.
11.
38.
16.
14.
24.
15.
18
21.
16.
16.
6.
3.
27.
27.
23.
4.
20.
29.
11.
11.
18.
8.
35.
22.
13.
Number of Years writh at least one period = 21. out of 31 years.
Page 1
- -- BA R -11 300 S?acJ,ng 3 -?
----- ----- - ------------ ------ ----------------- -------
DRAINMOD version 5.0
-_
_-Copyright-1990_94-North-Carolina-State-University
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-II; Croatan soils; 3' Depth @300' Ditch Spacing
^^^_^^^^^^^A__^^__^^^^^ ^
WILMINGTON, NC^WEATHER ^DATA ^1951-1981^TIME PERIOD
-------RUN STATISTICS ---------- time: 8/20/2002 @ 16:55
input file: C:\Drainmod\inputs\Barra-1l.lis
parameters: free drainage and yields not calculat
drain spacing = 9144. cm drain depth = 91.4 cm
------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Number of periods with water table closer than 30.50 cm
for at least 12 days. Counting starts on day
76 and ends on day 316 of each year
YEAR Number of Periods Longest Consecutive
of 12 days or Period in Bays
more with WTD
< 30.50 cm-
1951 0. 7.
6
1952 0. .
6
1953 0. .
4
1954 0.
2 .
24.
1955
1956 .
1. 13.
1957 0. 8.
20
1958 2. .
6
1959 0.
1 .
12.
19.60
1961 .
2. 18.
1962 0. 11.
14
1963 1-
0 .
10.
1964
1965 .
3. 14.
1966 1. 14.
4
1967 0. .
2
1968 0.
1 .
25.
1969
1970 .
2-. 20.
1971 1. 16.
0
1972 0.
1 .
14.
1973
1974 .
1. 27.
1975 0. 8.
11
1976 0. .
8
.1977 0. .
0
1978 0.
1 .
32.
-1979
1980 .
0. 7.
1981 1: 12.
Number of Years with at least one period = 15. out of 31 years.
Page 1
DL ? 2-0 0 i= c bra 'age '!'1f1_ae_r`Ce
-_-------------------------------------------
DRAINMOD version 5.0
Copyright 1990-94 North Carolina State university
------------------------------------------
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-11; Croatan soils; 44' Depth @400' Ditch Spacing
^^^^^^^^^_^^ ^^^
WILMINGTON NC^WEATHER ^DATA ^1951-1981^TIME ^PERIOD
--RUN STATISTICS ---------- time: 8/20/2002 @ 17: 4
input file: C:\Drainmod\inputs\Barra-ll.lisand yields not calculat
parameters: free drainage
drain spacing = 12194. cm drain depth = 122.0 cm
----------------------------------------------
Number of periods with water, table closer than 30.50 cm
-for at least 12 days. Counting starts on day
76 and ends on day 316 of each year
YEAR Number of Periods Longest consecutive
of 12 days or Period in Days
more with WTD
< 30.50 cm
--------------------
0 10.
1952
1953 .
0. 7.
1954 0. 0.
25
1955 2. .
7
1956 0.
0 .
10.
1957
1958 .
3. 38.
1959 0. 6.
13
1960 2. .
19
1961 2.
1 .
12.
1962 .
0 10.
1963 .
1 17.
1964 .
3 16.
1965 .
2 14.
1966 .
0 0.
1967
1968 .
0. 1. .
1969 3. 26.
24
1970 2.
1 .
16.
1971
1972 .
0. 0.
1973 1. 14.
25
1974 2. .
4
1975 0.
0 .
11.
1976 .
0 8.
1977 .
0 0.
1978
1979 .
2. 35.
1980 0. 9.
13
.1981 1. .
Number of Years with at least one period = 15. out of 31 years.
?a 1
5 ft D:ep?uh 23,0 ft Dra-%n-ag=e ?n?=1uea.ce
-----------------------------------------------------
DRAINMOD version 5.0
-_
_-Copyright-1990_94-North-Carolina -State-university
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-II; Croatan Soils; 5' Depth-@460 Ditch Spacing
^^-^^^^^^_^_^^^^__^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
WILMINGTON, ^NC^WEATHER^DATA ^1951-1981^TIME ^PERIOD
-RUN STATISTICS ---------- time: 8/20/2002 @ 17:19
input file: C:\Drainmod\inputs\Barra-Il.lis
parameters: free drainage and yi el ds not cal cul at
drain spacing = 14021. cm drain depth = 152.4 cm
----------------------------------------------------------
Number of periods with water table closer than 30.50 cm
for at least 12 days. Counting starts on day
76 and ends on day 316 of each year
YEAR Number of Periods Longest consecutive
of 12 days- or Period in Days
more with WTD
< 30.50 cm
------------------ --------------------
1951 0. -- - - -- 7 -
1952 0. 10.
1953 0. 5,
1954 0. 0.
1955 2. 25.
1956 0. 8.
1957 0. 10.
1958 3. 38.
1959 0. 6`
1960 2. 13.
1961 2. 19.
1962 1. 12.
1963 0. 9'
1964 1. i8.
1965 3. 16.
1966 3_ 14.
1967 0. 0_
1968 0_ 0_
1969 3. 27.
1970 2. 24.
1971 1. 12,
1972 0. 0,
1973 1. 14.
1974 2_ 25.
1975 0. 4.
1376 0. 11.
1977 0. 8,
1978 0. 0.
1979 2. 35.
1980 0. 8.
1981 1. 13.
Number of Years tin th at least one period = 15 _ out of 31 years.
?3y=- l
6 -ep t . -235 =t Dsa? na.g?e Z?z13a.es3.?Y
----------------------------------------------- i
DRAINMOD version 5.0
-copyright-1990_94-North -Carolina -State-University-_
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-II; Croatan Soils; 6` Depth @510` Ditch spacing
------------
WILMINGTON, ^NC^WEATHER ^DATA ^1951-1981^TIME ^PERIOI1^^^_^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
--RUN STATISTICS ---------- time: 8/20/2002 @ 18:38
input file= C:\Drainmod\inputs\Barra-I!.lis
parameters, free drainage and yields not cal cul at
drain spacing = 15545. cm drain depth = 182.9 cm
-------------------------------------------------
Number of periods with water table closer than 30.50 cm
for at least 12 days. Counting starts on day
76 and ends on day 316 of each year
YEAR Number of Periods Longest consecutive
of 12 days or Period in Days
more with WTD
< 30.50 cm
---------- ------- ---------------------
1951 0. 7.
15
1952 1. .
3
1953 0. .
0
1954 0. .
25
1955 2. .
8
1956 0. .
11
1957 0.
3 .
38.
1958
1959 .
0. 6.
1960 4. 14.
19
1961 2.
1 .
12.
1962 . 9
1963 0. .
18
1964 1.
3 .
16.
1965
1966 .
3. 16.
1967 0. 0.
0
1968 0. .
27
1969 2. .
25
1970
' 2.
1 .
12.
1971
1972 .
0. 0.
1973 1. 16.
1974 2. 25.
5
1975 0.
0 .
11.
1976
1977 .
0- 8.
1978 0. 0.
35
1979 2. .
8
1980 0.
0 .
11.
1981 .
Number of Years with at least one period = 15. out of 31 years.
a:y e i
INDUTE BARRA- i i Ted iT?AL?TD TP?Y ? S
D R A I N M 0 D
Copyright 1990-91 North Carolina State University
VERSION: NORTH CAROLINA MICRO-UNIX 5.0
LAST UPDATE: FEB. 1994
LANGUAGE: MS FORTRAN V 5.0 & UNIX f77
DRAINMOD IS A FIELD-SCALE HYDROLOGIC MODEL DEVELOPED FOR
THE DESIGN OF, SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. THE MODEL WAS
DEVELOPED BY RESEARCHERS AT THE DEPT. OF BIOLOGICAL AND
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF R. W. SKAGGS.
*DRAIN MOD-- 5-0*
DATA READ FROM INPUT FILE: C:\Draainmod\inputs\Barra-II.1iS
Cream selector (0=no, 1=yes) _
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-II; Croatan soils; 2 to 6 ft Depths @300` Ditch Spacing
WILMINGTON, NC WEATHER DATA 1951-1981 TIME PERIOD
CLIMATE INPUTS
CVARIABLE) VALUE UNIT
DESCRIPTION
-------------------------- -------
- ---------
------------------------- -----
----
C:\DRAINMOD\WEATHER\NWILMING.RAI
FILE FOR RAINDATA .. ...........
C:\DRAINMOD\WEATHER\NWILMING.TEM
EMPERATURE/PET DATA .
.
FILE FOR T
. (RAINID) 319457
RAINFALL STATION NUMBER .................. .......
(TEMPID) 319457
TEMPERATURE/PET STATION NUMBER.._. .................
(START YEAR) 1951
O YEAR
N ..................
STARTING YEAR OF SIMULATI
CSTART MONTH) 1 MONTH
STARTING MONTH OF SIMULATION ................
(END YEAR) 1981 YEAR
ENDING YEAR OF SIMULATION ......................
(END MONTH) 12
N MONTH
....................
ENDING MONTH OF SIMULATIO
(TEMP LAT) 34.16 DEG.MIN
TEMPERATURE STATION LATITUDE ...................
......(HID) 85.00.
HEAT INDEX ....................................
ET MULTIPLICATION FACTOR FOR EACH MONTH
00 .86 .82 .92 1.05 1.22 1.44
23 1
72 1
10 1
2
.
.
.
.
2.01 2.32
DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN
^
CONVENTIONAL DRAINAGE =--
°-=
JOB TITLE:
404 WETLANDS ANALYSIS BARRA-II; Croatan Soils; 2`- 6` Depth @300
WILMINGTON, NC WEATHER DATA 1951-1981 TIME PERIOD
STMAX = 3.00 CM SOIL SURFACE
T
Page 1
INPUTS BAp_1?A-IT WE-TLRND ANALYSIS
ADEPTH-=305. CM DDRAIN = 61 to 183 CM
-
0------------- SDRAIN = 9144. CM ----------- O .
EFFRAD = CM HDRAIN =218. CM
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
IMPERMEABLE LAYER
DEPTH SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
(CM)
.0 - 15.0 2.540
15.0 - 91.0 1.020
91.0 - 279.2 7.620
DEPTH TO -DRAIN- -=--61.0-to- - -QUA ------- - - ---- - ----- -
EFFECTIVE DEPTH FROM DRAIN To IMPERMEABLE LAYER = 218.2 CM
DISTANCE BETWEEN DRAINS = 9144.0 CM -
MAXIMUM DEPTH OF.SURFACE PONDING = 3.00 CM
EFFECTIVE DEPTH TO IMPERMEABLE LAYER = 279.2 CM
DRAINAGE COEFFICIENT(AS LIMITED BY SUBSURFACE OUTLET) = 5.00 CM/DAY
MAXIMUM PUMPING CAPACITY (SUBIRRIGATION MODE) = 2.50 CM/BAY
ACTUAL DEPTH FROM SURFACE TO IMPERMEABLE LAYER = 305.0 CM
SURFACE STORAGE THAT MUST BE FILLED BEFORE WATER
CAN MOVE TO DRAIN = 3.00 CM
FACTOR -G- IN KIRKHAM EQ. 2-17 = 4.72
SEEPAGE LOSS INPUTS
No seepage due to field slope
No seepage due to vertical deep seepage
No seepage due to lateral deep seepage
== end of seepage inputs WIDTH OF DITCH BOTTOM = 91.0 CM
SIDE SLOPE OF DITCH (HORIZ:VERT) = 1.00 : 1-00
INITIAL WATER TABLE DEPTH = 30.0 CM
SOIL INPUTS
TABLE 1
DRAINAGE TABLE
VOID VOLUME WATER TABLE DEPTH
(CM) (CM)
-0 .0
1.0 3-6.5
2.0 47.2
3.0 55.5
4.0 63.0
5.0 69.4
6.0 75.7
Pagea 2
!N--PJTS BARRA-II W--HTLAND AN3,_T YSTS
7.0 81.2
8.0 86.7
9.0 91.9
10.0 96.6
11.0 101.4
12.0 106.1
13.0 110.9
14.0 115.7
15.0 120.5 v
16.0 125.3
17.0 130.2
18.0 135.1
19.0 140.0
20.0 144.9
21.0 149.8
22.0 155.4
23.0 161.0
24.0 166.5
25.0 172.1
26.0 177.7
27.0 183.3
28.0 188.8
29.0 194.4
30.0 200.0
-3-5-. 0-- -.-L-2,2-3-8-
40.0 247.7
45.0 271.5
50.0 295.4
60.0 343.1
70.0 390.7
80.0 438.4
90.0 486.1
TABLE 2
SOIL WATER CHARACTERISTIC VS VOID VOLUME VS UPFLUX
HEAD
(CM)
.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0 -
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
130.0
140.0
150.0
160.0
170.0
180.0
190.0
200.0
210.0
220.0
23-0.0
240.0
250.0
260.0
270.0
280.0
WATER CONTENT
(CM/CM)
.4500
.4420
.4340
.4260
.4180
.4100
.4080
.4060
.4040
.4020
.4000
.3980
.3960
.3940
.3920
.3900
.3880
.3860
.3840
.3820
.3800
.3780
.37-60
.3740
.3720
.3700
.3690
.3680
.3670
VOID VOLUME
(CM)
00
.04
.18
.58
1.27
2.34
3.54
5.09
6.78
8.61
10.71
12.81
14.91
16.95
18.99
21.03
22.83
24.62
26.42
28.21
30.00
32..10
34.20
36.29
38.39
40.49
42.58
44.68
46.78
UPFLUX
(CM/HR)
.5000
.5000
.2167
.0777
.0331
.0170
.0071
.0040
.0020
.0010
.0008
.0005
.0003
.0002
.0001
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
?aae 3
- ---- - INPUTS Blkl A-TI WETLAND ANALYSIS
290.0 .3660 48.88
97
50 .0000
,0000
300.0 .3650
3600 .
61.46 .0000
350,0
400.0 .
.3567 71.94 .0000
0000
450.0 .3533 82.43
31
92 .
.0000
500.0 .3500
3440 .
94.33 .0000
600.0
700.0 .
.3380 95.75 .0000
0000
800.0 .3320 97.16
58
98 .
-0000
900.0 .3260 .
GREEN AMPT INFILTRATION PARAMETERS
i W.T.D.
(
(CM)
CM4
2
000 00
. 0
.5
.
000
10 .250 2.540
.
20.000 .430 2.160
40.000 .630 1.S90-
60.000 .830 1.590
80.000 .910 1.590
100.000 .990 1.590
150.000 2.970 1.590
200.000 2.970 1.590
1000.000
-
--- ---- -- -
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
NO WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SCHEDULED:
-----------------------------------
°- Wetlands Parameter Estimation
Start Day = 76 End Day = 316
Threshold water Table Depth (cm) = 30.5
Threshold Consecutive Days = 12
Fixed Monthly Pet values =
1 1.00 2 1.00 3 1.00 4 1.00 5 1.00 6 1.00 7 1.00 8 1.00
9 1.00 10 1.00 11 1.00 12 1.00
Mrank indicator = 0
END OF INPUTS
time: 8%20/2002 @ 16:34
--RUN STATISTICS ----------
input file: C:\Drainmod\inputs\Barra-ii_lisand yields not calcul at
parameters : free drainage
drain spacing = 9144. cm drain depth = 61.0 cm --
--------------------------------------
FOR 7/1953, NUMBER DAYS MISSING TEMPERATURE= 1
FOR 2/1956, NUMBER DAYS MISSING TEMPERATURE 3
FOR 9/1965, NUMBER DAYS MISSING TEMPERATURE= 1
Cbmputati onal Stati sti cs . <°
start Computations = 994.745
End Computations = 994.840
==>-Total simulation time = 5.7 seconds.
7age 4
j & SOIL SuivFY
TABLE 1.--TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION DATA
1 Temperaturel Precipitation'
i ; 2 years in 1 ; ;2 years in 101
10 will have-- 1 Average will have-- t Average ;
Month !Average;AveragetAverage; ; ;number oflAverage; i ;number oftAvera
1 daily 1.daily i daily 1 Maximum ; Minimum 1 growing Less 1 More ;days withlsnow=
maximum minimum; ltemperaturelte'mperature, degree 1 1than--;than--;0.10 inch;
higher } lower 1 days2
or more ,
1
i - 1
- , F. F i F i F
- i 1 In .1 In 1 in 1 i Ii
January_---1 55-9.1 35.3 1 45.6 i 77 1 17 1 57 1 3.41 1 1.94 1 4-61 1 7 1
February— 1 58.3 1 37.1 1 47-7 1 79 1 19 1 69 i 3.66 1 2.40 1 4.80 1 7 1
March-----=1 64.3 1 43.0 1 53-7 1 84 1 26 1 180 1 4:09 1 2.25 1. 5.58 1 8 t
April------1 73.7 1 51.66 1 62:7. 1 91 1 3k ; 381 1 3-07 1 1.36 1 4.46 1 5 1
_ ____---May------=-;-- -80.-5-1-_ -60:1-1- 70.5 ;- ----- ? -- -ll--- -'- '----- -? ----?
June-------1 86.2 1 67.2 1- 76.7 1 99 1
, 53 801 1 5.63 1 2.84 1 7-89 1 8 1
July ---- 89.0 1 71:'2 1 80:1 1 98 1 61 1 933 1 7.72 i 4.47 110.36 1 10 1
August-----1 88.3 1 70.5 1 79.4 1 98 60 1 911, 1 6.80 1 4.10 1 9.21 1 9
September--1 $3.7 65.2 1 74.5 ; 94 1 50 1 735 1 5.55 1 2.66 1 7-90 1 6 1
October--_-1 75.5 1 54.6 1 65:0 1 89 1 33 1 465 1 3.16 1 1.07 1 4.84 1 5 1
November ---i 66.5 1 43-7 1 55.1 1 82 1 25 162 1 3.19 1 1.28 1 4.73 1 5 1
December---1 59.1 1 37.4 1 48.3 1 78 1 18 i 115 1 3.17 1 1.59 1 4.44 1 6 1
=ear-----1 73.4. 53.1 1 63.3 1 99 1 15 1 5,445 1 53-54 1 47.28 82 1

11ecorded in the period 1952-74 at Wilmington, N.C.
2A growing degree day is an index of the amount of heat available for plant growth. It can. be dalcula
by adding the maximum and minimum daily temperatures, dividing the sum by 2, and subtracting th-e temperate
below which growth is minimal for-the prixicipal crops in the area (5d degrees F)
+it?
102
TABLE l.--TEMPERATURE AND PRECTPTTATION
FRecorded in the period 1951-73..a ayetteville, North Carolina, in Cumberland County]
Soil survey
Temperature ; Precipitation
2 years in ; ;2 years in 10; ;
10 will have-- Avera.e
g ; ?
will have-- ; Ave rage ,
Month !Average
ge ! Average:
e g
,number of ;Average!
,

; ,numb

er of;Av

erage
1 daily ; daily ; daily ! Maximum ; Minimum ; growing J ; Less More ;days with;sn cwfall
,maximum ; minimum) ; temperature Itemperature ; degree ; :than-- !than-- 10. 10 inch;
i higher lower ; da sl
Y
or
more ;
than-- , .than--

' or ; of ;
' of ;
? of F Units ;
I ! in ; in
! ; in
i ,
f
in
January----; 54.0 ; 30.0 ; 42.0 ; 78 ; i2 ; 25 ; 3:51 ; 2.22 ; 4.67 ;. 8 ; 7
F
eh '

-
r-_uzr_Y---
-
57-D--
--32.9 -
- 41.9-,
-----80 -
8 -----
5 5
March .------ 1 63.9 r 38.5 51.2 84 ; .23 ; ill 4.10 ; 2.59 5.45 i 8 ; .1
April ------ ; 73:5 ; 47.4 60.5 ; 91 ; 30 , 315 ; 3.21' ; 1.87 ; 4.40 ; 5 ; .D
, '
MaY-------- 8D
.7
56.3 ;
68.5 i
96, ;
37
; 57"4 ;
„•5'4
; 2.20
; 4.74 ;
6" ;
.D
June-------; 87.5 ; 64:7 ; 76.1 ; 100 ; 49 ; 783 ; 4.56 ; 2.50 ; 6.37 ;. 7 .0
July ------- s 90. ; 68.9 ; 79.6 ; 101 ; 57 ; 918 ; 4.94 ; 3.02 , 6.66 , 9 .0
August-----; 89.1 ; 67.9 ; 78.5 ; 99 ; 55 ; 884 5.67 ; 3-81 ; 7.36 1 8 ; .0
September--j 84.5 ; 61.8 73.2 ; 96 ; 45 ; 696 ; 3.53 ; 1_41 ; 5.36 ; 5 .0
October---; 75.4 1 50.1 62.7 i 90 ; 28 ; 394 ; 3_15 ; .78 ; 5.03 ; 5 i .0
November---; 66.0 ; 38.4 ; 52.2 84 19 ; 103 ; 2.40 ; 94 ; 3.61 ; 4 ; .0
December---; 56.0 ; 30.8 ;
i 43.4 ;
1 79 ; 12 ; 78 ;
I 2.85 ; 1.27 4.19 ; 6 ; 1:9
Yearly:
,
Average--; 73.1 i 49.0 ; 61.1 ; --= --- ; _-- ; --- ; --= i -== ; ---

• Extreme-=;
---
12
; -° ?
---
; --- i
; --= ;

Total-,-,'
--- J --- ; --- ; --- ;
--- '
; 4,903 1
45-56
37.72
;?;
79 ;
3.2
i
1A growi
maximum and ng degr
minimum ee day is
daily t a unit
rat of heat available for-plant growth.
i It can be calculated by adding the

growth is mi
ni
l f empe
ur
t es, d
viding the sum by
° 2, and subt racti ng the temperature below ;which
ma or
he principal crops in the area (50 F).
104
TABLE 2.--FREEZE DATES IN SPR_NG AND FALL
[Recorded in the period 1951-73 at Fayetteville,
North Carolina in Cumberland County]
,
,
i Temperature
Probability ; 24 F { 2.8 F 1 32 F
. or lower or lower or lower
i '
i i
Last freezing ;
temperature
in spring: ;
i
1 year in 10
later than-- ; March 27 ; April 13 ; April 30
2 years in l0 ; ; ?
later than-- ; March 17 1 April 4 ; April 19
5 years in 10 ;
later than-- , February 25 1 March 17 1 March 30
First freezing ;
temperature ;
in fall:
1 year in 10
earlier than__ 1 November 5 October 27 ; October 20
2 years in 10
earlier than-- ; November 17 November 1 ; October 2,;
-5 years in 10 ;
earlier than-- ; November 22 ; November 12 ; October 31
[Recorded in the period 1951-73 at Pinehurst,
North Carolina, in Moore County], -
i - Temperature
,
Probability ; 24 F ; 28 F ; 32 F
1 or lower 1. or lower or lower
Last freezing 1
temperature ;
in spring: ;
1 year in 10
later than,-- ; March 27
2 years-in 10 1
later than-- ; March 19
- 1
5 years in 10 1
later than-- 1 March 5
,
,
,
,
rst freezing ;
temperature
in
1 year in 10 ;
earl?er than-- 1 November 4
,
2 years in 10 1
earlier than _- F November 9
,
,
5 years in 10
1
earlier than-- Nov-mh?r ,o
April 2
March 30
March 23
April 24
April 18
April 5
October 23 1 October 14
,
October 28 1 October 19
1
i
,umberiand and Hoke Counties, North Carolina
TABLE 3. --':-':ROVING SEASON
- T [Recorded in the period 1951-73, Fayetteville,
North Carolina, in Cumberland County]
Daily min-: mum temperature
during growing season
Probability ? Higher ; Higher I Higher
than ; than. ; than
1 240 F i 280 r 326 F
Days i Days Days
9 years in 10 ', 231 I 202 175
215
8 years in 10 , 24> 189
? - --,-- --'
i ?
5 years in 10 i 270 239 214
262 1 239
2 years in 10 1 295
1
1 year in 10 i 308 275 253
[Recorded in the period 1951-T3 at Pinehurst,
North Carolina, in Moore County]
Daily minimum temperature
during growing season
nigher
Probability i nigher i gher
than 1 than than
240 F. 286 F 1. 32 F
i Davs
i Days ' DDS
11
1 r
180
g years in 10 1 228 1 210
8 years in 10 1 238 1 .216 189
i
5 years in 10 1 258 i 228 205
,
2 years in 10 1 278 1 240 221
1 year ih 10 l 288 1 247 1 229
105
,bar and an riJK_ COUilTies, IlOrr? C3rOili ?3
soil is suited to loblolly pine. The dominant trees
?bioliy pine, sweetgum, yellow-poplar, and white
"he main understory includes holly, sourwood, red
zaple, and dogwood. Wetness restricts the use of
:quipment and damages seedlings.
This soil is suited to most urban and recreational uses.
Afetness and slow permeability are the main limitations:
=rosion can .be a problem on slopes if disturbed sites
are not revegetated promptly.
This soil is in capability subclass Ille and woodland
suitability group 3w.
Gb
be difficult during very wet periods when the organic _
surface layer becomes soggy.
Croatan soil is poorly suited to trees. Because the soil
is poorly suited to other uses, many areas of it probably
will remain in native woodland for many years. The
dominant trees are pond pine, water tupelo, baldcypress,
loblolly pine, sweetgum, swamp tupelo, and Atlantic
white-cedar. The understory includes sweetbay,
greenbrier, and gallben-y. In its natural, undrained state,
this soil provides good habitat for wetland wildlife.
This soil is poorly suited to most urban and
recreational uses. Wetness and low strength are the
CT--Croatan muck. This nearly level, very poorly main limitations. Vllw and woodland
This soil is in capability subclass
drained, organic soil is mostly in large, oval depressions
in the southeastern part of Cumberland suitability group 4w.
or Carolina bays
County. Most areas of this unit have thick, almost De-Deioss loam; This nearly level, very poorly
impenetrable undergrowth; therefore, the soils were
xamined mostly along canals, trails, and fogging roads.
drained soil is on terraces of the Cape f=ear and Lower
unty,
u
e
e
In selected areas, transects were made across the [and,
ecific points to verify the
t
d
m are long and
areas of this unit generally
ndividu 'at
more than and
acres
200
t
sp
e a
a
and borings were
ries of the soils were drawn from
d o
narrow and range from 10 acres
a
soils: The boun
limited-field o[?servations,-using-aersal--photographs 2s____
Although this unit-was mapped
ti
n
t in srce.
___ T catl ? ttte surface-layer-is-black-loam 1-0-inches_-___ ___ __.
Yp Y
.
o
a
aids for interpre
with fewer detailed observations thawere most me
e
t sthick. and 3 it inches thick. The subsoil to a depth of 72 inch s
h
units in the survey,, the resulting delineations
et
jor anticipated uses of the soil.
h is raYish brown, light brownish gray, and tight gray
art and gray sandy loam
er
h
g
e ma
needs for t
Individual areas of this unit range from 100 acres to p
e upp
d ciav foam in t
sa,n the lower part
re than 500 acres in size.
_ typically, the soli is black muck to a depth of 37 permeability is moderate. Reaction ranges from very

in all
acid
sli
h
rizons.
`ies.. The underlying material to a depth of 80 inches e
during surfa
seasonal water tab e is at or near the
dark gray sandy loam.
to moderately rapid. Where the
l
'
the winter and early in spring. This soil is subject to rare
ow
Permeability is s
soil is drained, permeability is moderate in the organic floc cifuaed with this soil in mapping are small areas of
layer and moderate or moderately slow in the mineral
except where the
id
l better drained Roanoke and Whhre soils and more
included are small areas of
Als
,
y ac
layer. Reaction is extreme
surface had been limed. Except where the soil is drained; o
clayey Cape Fear soils.
sand soils that have thin subhorizons high in organic
the seasonal high water table is at or near the surface matter content These sandy soils are on small, narrow,
from 8 months to the full year.
il in mapping are small areas of
hi
slightly elevated ridges that have distinctive, gray or
- -
s so
Included with t
Torhunta, Lynn Haven, and Leon soils. All of
lohnston .
white surfaces Several large areas of this sal[ have been cleared to
,
?
these are mineral soils. They typically are on the outer
s of oval-shaped delineations of Croatan soils. They
d
grow corn and soybeans. The rest are in woodland.
uited to growing cultivated crops, such as
ft i
ge
e
may be in slightly elevated areas located randomly within
s s
This so
yields are
ood
small grains
-and
eans
orn
. G
y

mapped areas. Also included are small areas of similar
anic surface tier thinner than 16 ,
h have been
cc
soil
, ommon
in areas of
cted from flooding. Open
t
soils that have an org
inches or thicker than 51 inches. These soils are e
drained and pro
properly
ditches are the most common method used to drain this
randomly intermingled with Croatan soil. Included soils
make up less than 20 percent of most unit. soil:
Delos soil is well suited to grasses and legumes for
Most areas of this soil are in woodland. A small
cleared for growing corn and
b hay and pasture. If this soil is used for pasture, proper
timely deferment of
e rotation
t
een
acreage has ,
ur
stacking rates, pas
ted use during wet periods help to
t
i

so_
This soil is poorly
_ This so suited to growing cultivated crops
is the main limitation. If the soil
t
c
r
raain and res
9 g= and
keep the
l in an coaode surface c rani g
t s
u
i
s
ness
and to pasture. We
is drained, corn and soybeans can be grown. Suitable c
s ton we
l
o
hen t e
w
and poor filth.
drainage outlets, however, usually are unavailable.
Wetness also limits the use of this soli for pasture or This soil is suited to hardwoods and pines. Water
elo and sweetgum can be grown without artinc'sal
t
Fay. Even with proper drainage, grazing probably would up

74
Soil Survey
Ap-0 to 7 inches; brown (IOYR 5/3) loam; weak fine Oat-0 to 4 inches; black (10YR 2/1 broken face and
granular structure; friable; common fine and medium rubbed) sapric material; about 10 percent fibers
roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. unrubbed and 31percent rubbed; moderate fine
_3t1-7 to 23 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 516) clay; granular structure; very friable; many fine and
moderate fine and medium angular blocky and medium roots; common grains of clean sand; about
subangular blocky structure; firm, sticky, plastic; 50 percent organic material; extremely acid; gradual
common fine and medium roots; few discontinuous wavy boundary. .
clay films on faces of peels and in. pores; very shiny Oa2--4 to 37 -inches; black (10YR 2/1 broken face and
ped faces; very strongly acid; gradual wavy rubbed) sapric material; about 8 percent fibers
boundary. unrubbed; less than 4 percent rubbed; massive; very
Bt2-23 to 44 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 514) clay; friable; common medium roots; few grains of clean
common medium distinct gray (10YR 6/1) mottles; sand; about 50 percent organic material; extremely
moderate medium angular and subangular blocky acid; gradual wavy boundary.
structure; firm, sticky, plastic; few fine and medium
i Cg-37 to 80 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) sandy loam;
il-ms--on--faces-of-pbds----
--- - -roots;-few discontinuous-clay-f ---
massive; friable; extremely acid. ---
and in pores; very shiny ped faces; very strongly
acid;_ gradual wavy boundary.
Cg1-44 to 58 inches; gray (10YR 6%1) clay; common
fine prominent strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) mottles;
massive; firm, sticky, plastic;-very strongly acid;
gradual wavy boundary.
Cg2-58" to 80 inches; gray (10YR 6/ 1) clay loam;
common fine distinct strong brown (7:5YR 516)
mottles; massive; firm, sticky, plastic; very strongly
acid.
- The loamy and clayey horizons are 40 to 60 inches
deep to stratified deposits of the Coastal Plain. Reaction
is very strongly acid or strongly acid, except where the
surface has been timed.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 1 OYR, value of 5, and
chroma of 1 through 3; or it has value of 4 and chroma
of 1 or 2. The E horizon, where present, -has hue of
10YR, value of 6 or 7, and chroma of 3 or 4.
The BA horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or
2.5Y, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 4. It is loam, clay
loam; or silty clay loam. The Bt horizon has hue of 10YR,
value of 5 or 6,. and chroma of 4 through 8; hue of 2.5Y,
value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 4 through 6;,or hue of
7.5YR, value of 5, and chroma of 6 through 8. The lower
part of the Bt horizon is mottled with gray, brown- or red,
or it is dominantly gray- The Bt horizon is clay, silty clay,
silty clay loam, or clay loam.
The Cg horizon is gray with red, yellow, or brown
mottles. It is clay, clay loam, sandy clay loarrt, or sandy
ioaRt,
Graatan Series
The Croatan series consists of very poorly drained
organic soils that formed in highly decomposed organic
material underlain by loamy sediment. The Croatan soils
are in the Carolina bays. Slope is less than 2 percent.
. Typical pedon of Croatan muck, in Cumberland
County, approximately 15 miles southeast of Fayerteville,
1.1 miles northeast of the intersection of State Road
2041 and 2042 along State Road 2041, and 1.1 miles
southeast, in a large bay. - - - -
Croatan soils have organic horizons that total 16 to 51
inches in thickness. They are extremely acid, except
where the surface has been rimed. Logs, stumps, and
fragments of wood make up 0 to 10 percent of the
organic tiers. Fiber content is less than 25 percent
unrubbed and less than 1 D percent rubbed. The
underlying rnineral horizon is extremely acid through
slightly acid.
The organic tiers have hue of 7.5YR through 5Y, value
of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 2. They typically are .
massive under natural conditions. When drained and
cultivated; granular or blocky structure develops in all" or
part of the organic tiers.
The mineral horizon has hue of 7.5YR through 5Y,
value of 2 through 6, and chroma of 1 through 3. It
typically is sandy loam or sandy clay loam: Some pedon
contain thin strata of sand or loamy sand.
Delass Series
The Deloss series consists of very poorly drained soils
that formed in loamy sediment on terraces along the
Cape Fear and Lower Little Rivers. These soils are in
Cumberland County. Slope is less than 2 percent
Typical pedon of Deloss loam, in Cumberland County,
is 2 miles south of Fayetteville on N.C. Highway 87, 0.3
mile west on East Mountain Drive, "150 feet south of the
road: -
Ap=O to 10 inches; black CN 2/0) loam-, weak fine
granular structure; friable; strongly acid; abrupt
smooth boundary.
E-10. to 13 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2)
loamy sand; weak medium granular structure; friable
strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
Btg1-13 to 24 inches; grayish brown (10YR 5/2) sandy
clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; common fine flakes of mica; few
medium pockets of sandy loam; strongly acid;
aradual wavy boundary.
. IN
15 --j YS7-LL Ir'-ND `:'T --'- vRw- _--
> means more `an. -ntries under "Erosior. -`actors--T" apply to the entire
e symbol < means less than;
Drofile. Entries under "Organic c matter", apply Only to tae surface layer. Absence of an entry indacztes
that data were not available or were not estimated]
name and ! Depth ; Permeability
symbol i !
!.Available 1 Soil ! Shrink-swell
water ;reectiOnl pot-ential
;capacity ; ?.
; in/in ; DH

aA-------------- ; 0-11 i 2.0=6.0 10.12-0.20;4.5-6.0 ;Lott------------
Altavist a 1 11-37 1 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.2014.5_6.0 1Low------------
-----
1 37-80 1 --- ---
uA---- --------- 1
1
1 0-25 1
39 1
25 >6.0
0-6.0
2 10.04-0.0914.5-6.5
10.08-0.1314.5-5.5 1Low------------
;Low------------
-1 e
Autryvi
i -
39-59 1
" .
>6.0 10.03-00814.5-5.5 ;Low------------
; 59-80 ; 0.6-2.0 10.'10-0.1514.5-5.5
' l ;Low------------
,
l 1
-1
i
2.0-6.0 ,
10.15-0.2014.5-6.0
;Low=-----------

---
'
Aycock i 13-80 , 0.6-2.0 ,0.15_0.20,4.5-5.5 Low ---------
BaD=--=-----!
3a B 0-25 i >6.0 10.03-0.0614.5-6.0 !Low
--
,
Blaney l 25-34 ! 0.2-0.6 0.05-0.1014.5-5.5 ---- - -----
1 ^
1 34-80 ; 0.2-0.6 10.03-0.0814.5-5.5 Low---=--------

Blaney---------- i 0-25 ; >6.0 10.03-0.0614.5-6.0
_----
!Low=------

; -5-34 1 0:2-0.6 10.05-0.1014.5-5.5 !Low------------
-- ?- --34_80 '--
-- ?_ - 5 •- 5 --', Low------------
Eresaon ,
°actors ! Organic
matter
,
K l T -
!
0.24
0.24
0.10
0.10
0:10
0.17
i
0.37
0.43.
I
,
0.15
0.28
0.28
l
0.15
0.28
0.28

Urban land.
--------1
B------
B 0-6 i 2.0-6.0` 10.06-0.1214.5-5.5 ;Low------------ !

1
; 6-30 i 0.2-0.6 10.10-0.1514.5-5:5 ;Low------------
B
Bragg 30-80 1 0.2-0.6 '.0.10-0.15!4.5-5.5 jLow---- ---
-------------- ' 0-9 i. 6.0-20 10.05-0-1014.5-5.5 !Low------------ ;
1
;utters 1 9-37 ; 2.o-6.0 ;-0.10-0.14;4.5-5.5 ;Low -----------_
1
! 37-58 l 6.0-20 10.03-0.0814.5-6.5 ;Low-----------
1 58-80 1 0.6-2.0 10.10-0.1514.5-5.5 ;Low------------ i
,
By---------------' 0-i8 l 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.20;3-6-5.5 !Low------------ 1
1
Byars ! 18-80 ; 0.06-0.2 ;0.14-0.1813.6-5.5 ;Moderate-------
CaD --------- 1
CaB 0-20 -! 6.0-20 ;0.03-0.06!3.6=6.0 !Low------------ 1
;
,
Candor ; 20-30 ; 6.0-20 lO.D6-0.10!3.6-5.5 !Low------------
; 60-80 1 0.6-2.0 0.12-0.1613.6-5.5 !Low------------
, 1
Cf--------------- 1 0-16 1 0.6-6•.0 10.15-0.22;4.5-6.5 ;Low--=--------- 1
Cape rear ! 16-52 ! 0.06-0.2 10.12-0.22!4.5=6.0 ;Moderate---;
1
---------------- !
'
'
52-62 ! --- -
-- -
, -
---
,
Ch---------------1 0-25 0.6-2.0 0.15-0.24;4.5-6.5 !Low------------ ,
Chewacla 1 25-48 ; 0.6-2.0 ;0.12-0.2014.5-6.5 1LoW-------- ---_ 1
i
1 48=64 ; 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.24;4.5-6.5 lLow---=-------
Co------------ 1 0-7 i 0..6-2.0 10.12=0.1713.6-5.5 !Low------------ !
l
Coxville 1 7-55 ; 0.2-0.6 ;0.14-0.1813.6-5.5 ;Moderate-----__
1
----- ----- -- ;
!
-5-72 !
7
---

--- ! --- I -
'
CrB--------------1 0-7 ; 0.6-2.0 ;0.12-0.1814.5-6.5 !Low------------ ;
l
Craven 1 7-58 1 0.06-0.2 10.12-0.1513.6-5.5 !Moderate---
i
1 58-80 ; 0.2-6.0 10.08-0.14;3.6-5.5 !Low------------
CT---------- 1 0-37 1 0.06-6.0 10.35-0.451 <4.5 ;Low------------ 1
Croatan 1 37-80 1 0.2-6.0 10.10-0.1513.6-6.5 !Low------------ ,
- ! 0-13 ; 2.0-6.0 10.10-0.1614:5-6-5 ;Low ------------
De-------------- 48 ; 0
6-2
0 10.12-0.18!4.5-5.5 tLow-------
Deloss ; 13- .
. -----
1
----------

,
! 48-72 l --- - - -
--- 1 ,
0.20
0.20
0.28
0.28
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.17
0.28
0.32
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.32
,
,
,
1
1
,
,
1
,
,
;
1
,
!
!
,
1
!
,
!
!
1
!
!
!
,
,
,
,
,
l
,
,
5 i .5-3
,
I
1
1
5 1 -5-1
,
,
;
5
;
;
5 ! <.1
;
5 ; <1
,
5
5
5
5
5
l
;
0-2
;
;
1
, •5-2
!
!
2-9
,
i
!
;
5-15
,
!
;
!
1-4
!
;
2-4
!
.5-2
,
1
,
,
25-60
,
! 2-9
!
1
0.28 ! 5
0.28 1
0.32 i
0.24
0.32 l
;
0.37 i 5
0.32 i
0-32 !
1
0.24 1 5
0.24 1
1
See footnote at end of able.
1 L. --I:NCIING ND 2302 R'-= --Co_-_nuec
S--_lcazlon
I name and ;Depth; USDA texture 1 i
symbol Unified ; AASHmO
f -n ,
t I I ,
C SM 1 A-3 ,
1 1 A-2-4
or 120-30il.oamy sand ------- iSM, SP-SM 1A-2-4
? f 1 4
1 l
130-60 1 Sand-------- i SP-SM, SM !A-3,
f r 1 ? A-2-4
160-801Sandy clay loam, 1SC, SM-SC,1A-4,
i 1 sandy loam, i SM - i A-2,
i 1 sandy clay. i 1-.A-7-6
f I ' '
-------------i IA-4, A-6
e i C1
ar 116-521C1ay loam, clay, 1M-y; CL, 11-7
i i silty clay. i MH, CH 1
52-6.21 VarizDle--------1 --- ,
1 --
-= --=-- 0-251loam----------- in in, Cl., IA-4, A--6
aacla I i 0'7'-M_ I
125-64iSandy clay loam, 1SM ;A=4, A-6
1 I clay loam, loam. ICL, SC, MZ1
1 i
zv MT.. 'L-A A-1
ments
> 3
inches
1 1 clay, clay. 1 1 `,
- '
57-72 1 Variable-------, --- t ---
t -
1 --
-- --1 0-7 ;Loan-=-----------iML, CL-M.L,1A-4 i 0
SM=sc1
I 1 sM 1
Craven ,
I
1 7-581C1ay, silty clay, CH iA-7 i 0
1 1 silty clay loam •1 i
158-801Sandy clay loam, 'SM, SM-SC,1A-2, A-4,1 0
1 1 sandy loam, 1 SC ; A-6
i 1 clay loam.
1
C2- ----- i 0-371Muck iPi t -- i - --
Croatan 137-801Sandy loam, fine- ISM, SC, 1A-2, A-4 1 0
1 sandy loam, 1 S*'-SC i
i i
, mucky sandy
loam.
De-------------- 11 SM-SC, 1 A-2 ,
MI 1
CL
r.L A-4 i
i 0
Deloss -
,
; i
113-48 1 Sandy clay loam, I S19-SC, SC, 1 A-4, A-6, 1 0
1 i clay loam, fine i CL=ML, CL1 A-7 i
t
i 1 sandy loam. 1 1
148-72 1 Variable------1 -- 1 - - ---

D3A---=--- 1
--=i 0-4 ,Fine sandy loam 1Sii, SC, 1A-2,
A-4
0
Dome 1 i 1 SM-SC 1
1 4-551Clay loam, clay, 1CL, CH, SC1A-6,
A-7
0
sandy clay loam.l i 1
155-721Stratified sand 1SM., SC, 1A-2, A=4,11 0
1 i to sandy clay 1 SP_.. i A-1
i loam. i SM-SC i
DhA----- ---i 0-111ycamy sar d-----iSM 1rA-2 i 0
Dothan 111-381Sandy clay loam, 1SM-SC, SC, 1A-2, A-4,11
I 0
sandy loam. SM - 1 A-6 t
138-721Sand7clay loam, 1SM SC, SC,1A-2, A-4,1 0
1 sandy clay. ; SM, C1 1 A-o'
1 , A-71
1 -
Dn--------- - ----i 0-101loam ------------ 1SM, SM-SC 1t-2, A-d
I 0
Dunbar 110-721Sandy clay, clay ICI, CH 1A-o, A-7 1 0
r f loar•, clay. 1 1 '
n- --------- --- 1 0-6 ;Sandy loam-----1SM, SM-SC 1A-2, A-4 1 0
_
Duzlin 11 6-651Sand7 clay, clay 1CL,-C3, SC A=6, A-7 1 0
1 loam, clay. i r
I r •i 1
I r 1
ercen-?aae 'Fassr.
s=eve numDer-
40 1 200
11,auid 1 Plas-
limit ; tic_ty
i nde?
t 1 1 ' 1
100 ; 100 155-90 1 5-15 1 ---
1 Nrp
00 100 165-90 110-25 1 -- 1 hP
i
1190-100190_100;55-90 1 5-15 i --- ---
I , I
1 1
i90-100190-100i555-90 X25-4 .9 ' <4_' 1 INTTP-25
4 ?
1 100 195-700185-100160-90 1 20-40 1 3=15
1 100 195-100190-100160-85 1 41-65 i 15-35
? I
' t i 1 1 1
198-1:00195-100170-100155-90 1 25-40 1 NP-20
1 1
196-100195-100160-80 136-70 1 <37 1 NP-28
, t 1 1 1 I
100 ' 100 185-97 146-75 20-46 3-15
loo ; 100 175-100145-90.1 <35 i 11P-7
? i
100 ; 100 190-100165-98 ; 51-70 i 24-43
I ,
1 100 195-100150-100115=49 i <35 i TP-5
,
r , , 1 [
100 1 100 160-85 125-49 1 <30 i NT-10
, 1 1
1 1 i i i [
I t 1 1
! 100 100 170-95 1130-65 1 <35 i NP-7
1 100 100 175-98 136-70 1 16-45 i 4-22
,
1 1 1 :
i 1 1 [ 1 [
1 ?
1 --- I -- 1 --- I I
I 1 I 1 i i
195-100175-100150-100120-50 i <25 1 IT-P-10
1 1 [ 1
195=100175-1001165-100140-90 1 35-60 ; 16-40
180-100160-1Q0'35-100110-40 1 <30. 1 NP-1 0
1 1 1 1
I I 1 1 1 1
195-100192-100,160=80 113-30 1 -- i NP
195-100192-100158-90 123-49 i <40 t NP-16
195-100192-100170-95 130-53 1 25-45 1 4-23
1 1 -1
1 100 100 150-95 120-50 1 <30 i' NP-7
1 100 1 100 185-95 1150-70 1 36-60 1 18-»
, I 1 1 i 1
1
1 100 1 100 167-98 120-49 1 <26 1 IvP-7
1 100 198-100180-100145-75 1 24-54- 1 13-35
, 1 I I
See footnote at end Of taDle•
1154
Sail survey
_iiBL. 17-- ENGiN=:S1NG 1NDE: TEST DATA
[Dashes indicate data were not available. NP means nonnlastic]
Grain size distribution ;Moisture
Classif ication ; density
Soil name, Percentage ; Percentage ;
s

-
report number-, pas sing s ieve- - ; s maller than.--; ; x;
horizon, and 4) ; S-
-
I =
depth in inches ,
o
G, +r ; E y
; AASHTO ;Unified ; No.; No.; No.! No.! . 02 1.0051-002; 3 ;? -i% M;;
; 4 i 10 ; 40 1 .2001 mm ; mm ; mm ; ++ ; A ; R °' ; a o
,
1 ,
1 1 1
I I 1
I i
1 r
1 I 1
1 1 t
1 -.1 t?
I 1? 91O c
t I

1 1 1 I

I I

, 1

? , , 1 1

, I D 1
- ct ,
I- 1
; t ;Pct
1 I-
1
1
Blaney:l I
I 1
1 1 , I ; I ; _ 1 1 1 I
(S74NC093-008)
I
I
1 1
T
1
1
I I
,
1
1 1
I
E-----_---7 to 27 ;
A-1-6 1
; SP-SM I
1100 ; 1
92 ; 1
40 ;
9 ; I 1
7 ; 4" ; 1
2 1 1 1 1•
- 1 NP ; 114; 12
Btl------ 27 to 39 ; A-2-7 ; SM ;100 ; 95 ; 34 ; 22 1 21 ; 19 ; i7 1 46 ; 19 11 120; 12
Bt2------ 48 to 64 ;
_ 1
I A-2-4 ; 5C
1
1 ;106
1
1 ; 91 ;
1 1
I , 33 ;

; 19
1
I 18 ; 15 ;
1
1 1 13 1

I 33 ;
1
I 10 ; 124; 11
1
1 I
" 1
1
Candor:2
1 1
1

1 1
1

1
I ;

1 1 1
I

t
;

I 1 1
1 1

1 1
.;

1 1
1

I 1
, 1

1 1
(S74NC051-002) 1 I I i 1
E1-------=8 to 33 ; A-2-4 ; SP-SM 1100 1100 ; 72 ; 12 1 71; 4 ; 3 ; - ; NP ; 116; 10
Btl------ 43 to 50 ; A-2-4 ; SM ;100 ;100 ; 74 ; 22 ; 18 ; 15 ; 13 ; 21 ; 3 1 116; 10
------Bt3------6o-o-80--;

1
i

,

r
I

1

1 3.0-1

, 1 -28-;

; -44-1-

I 22-; -1-1-2-1-1-6-

I 1

;
Oroatan• -3
, 1
1

1
I

1 1 1
, 1

I I 1
1

, 1
1

, 1
1 ;

, 1
; 1
1

, I I 1
1 1

1 I
(374NC051-003) ; ; ;
Cg-------37 to 52 ; A-2-4 ; SM 1100 1100 76 ; 25 10 ; 5 ; 4 ; - ; NP ; 118; 10
Cg-------52 to 64 ; A-4
T ; SM
1 1100
1 ;100 ;
1 1
1 1 81 ;
1
, 42 ;
1
1 1.6.; 4 ;
1
1 3
1
1 ; - ;
1
; NP ; 122; 8
r I
1 I
1

Dothan:3
1 1
; 1
1
1 1 I
r 1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
, I 1
, 1 1
1 ;
(S74NCO93-009) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
A 0 to 7 ; A-2-4 ; SM 1100 1100 1 77 ; 27 i 13 ; 7 ; 4 ; - ; NP ; 120; 09
Btl---- =-11 to 25 ; A-6 ; SC ;100 ; 99 ; 77 ; 46 ; 36 ; 30 ; 26 1 33 1 16 ; 116; 13
Bt2------25 to 38 ; A-7-6 ; CL ;lo0 ;100 ; 82 ; 53 ; 46 ; 40 ; 37 ; 45 1 23 If 108; 18
Bt3------38 to 63 ; A-7-6
1
1 ; CL

I ;100

;. ; 99 ;
, 1
, 1 81 ; 50
I
, ; 43 1 37
1 r
1 1 ; 34
1
1 ;.44 ;.
1 1
1 19 ; 109; 17
I I
1 1

Faceville:2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

, ; 1

i 1 1
1
; , I
1
1 I 1

, 1 1 1

1 1
_ (s74NCO51-.006)
A 0 to 7 ; A=2-4 ; SM ; 100 1100 ; 84 1 22 ; 8 ; 4 ; 2 ; - ; NP ; 112; 10
Btl=---=-17 to 52' 1 A-7-6 ; CL ;100 ;100 1 84 ; 52 It 46 ; 43 ; 41 ; 49 ; 23 t 107; 18
Bt2------ 52 to 70 ; A-7-6
, ; Sc
1 ;100
1 ;100
I ; 86
I - ; 46
1 1 37 1 34
I ; 33
I ; 46 ;
; 1 21 ; 109; 17
,

3
Fu ua
q Y• 1 1

I 1

I 1

I

; , 1 1

1 1

; - I - ,

1 I ? 1

? 1
(S74NCO93-007) ; ; ; ; ; ; i ; ; ; i ; ;
E---------3 to 29 ; A-2-4 ; SM ;100 1100 ; 80 ; 18 ; 8 ; 4 ; 2 ; - ; NP ; 1151 10
Be-------29 to 42 ; A=2-4 ; SM ;100 ;100 ; 79 ', 26 ; 19 ; 15 ; 13 ; 20 ; 2 ; 124; 10
Btl------ 42 to 60 ; A-T-6 ; SC
1
I 100
,
1 ;100
1
1 ; 81
1
i ; 41
+
1 ; 34 1 30
1
; t ; 28
1
, ; 45 1
1 1
1 1 21 ; 107; 18
r 1
t l
-

Woodington: 1
1
1
I 1
1
1
, i
1
1
, 1
1
I
1 1
f
1
, l
f
1
, 1 I ?
1 1
1 1
, I 1
I
1
1 1 I
1 1
1 1
1 t 1
1 I
1 T
I 1 1
(S74NC051-01D4)
1
1
1 '
I `
A-------- 0 to 5 ; P_-2-4 ;. SM 1100 1100 ; 71 ; 26 1 19 1 11 ; 6 ; - ; NP 108; 14
Btg------ 11 to 28 ; A-2=4 ; SM ;100 ;100 ; 63 ; 25" ; 21 ; 15 1 11 ; 17 1 3 ; 1261 10
BCgl-----28 to 37 1 A-2-4
1 ; SM

1 ;100

1 ;100
1
1 i 65
1
I ; 22
I
1 1 18 ; 13
1 1
1 , ; 9
1
1 ; 14
1
1 ; 2 ; 1271 69
1 1
1- ; I
1 his pedon is a iaxadjunct to the Blaney series, because the medium and coarse sand
content in the A horizon and the liquid limit of the Bt horizon are higher than allowed for
the series. Pedon located abiout 8 miles west of Raeford in Hoke County; from the --'
intersection of State Road 1218 and 1214, 1.5 miles southeast along State Road 1214, then.
200 feet northwest of the road.
2 Pedon located about 1 mile east of Interstate 95 interchange at Hope Mills along
State Road 2252, 0.7 mile northeast along a field road and 100 feet north of field road in
an idle field in Cumberland County. -
3 This is a "typical pedon for the series. See the section, soil series and their
morphology for the location of the pedon.
TopoZone - The Web's Topograpbic Map Page 1 of 2
M7;.
Target is UTM 17 709778E 3869088N - AUTRYVILLE quad FQuad Info]
,y
rt_ Ir .
ai5

x
>z:

M 2-
?'ES 1
-
'?F v } T

- -_. _ _- -_ - - _-
^2 -- s4
_ a

'Lo

- - s
Ji

-Az
? a r
N

-
S - '

x ?
z
i .._
24

"
-
S I ?
J L rta
Z
&
. ?y

a c c,;: x y
y

""4 5
t
?
?z

http:%/-,?,ww.topozone.com/print.asp`?z=17&n=3869088&e=70977'0&s=50&size=m 8/20/02
TopoZone - The Web's Topographic Map
Page 1 of 2
TiannIn L.-CO
Target is UTM 17 710519E 3868292N - AUTRYVILLE quad FQuad Info1
_ ?
a
te

Yc'r I

.y
L+? ? fI
VIN
'
l C
'
' ? ?Y
?
FF

12
1
'?
i
TTC 1
gt } ci {

i
-- ? c3 i
Y p

t
..
rte te. _ _..
.
- .. _ S _.
-:
- - _ _
?... .. ..F-.. _
.aa..- ... .._... .. ...? _ :..,.
•- .
.
....?rY y

http:llR,-??,-,v.topozone.comlprint.asp?z=17&n 3568292&e=710 19&s=25&size?m
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. 22596
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS North Carolina Division of Water Quality 3/3/2004
Date Type Reference Original Amt. Balance Due Discount Payment
03/03/2004 Bill Permit Fee 200.00 200.00 200.00
Check Amount 200.00
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
MAR 5 2004
IIVAT EIS QUALITY SECTION
Coastal Federal Bank 401 Application Fee 200.00