20061334 Ver 2_Mitigation Plans_20070404

6
Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ?u c) to - 13 3 4 V Z
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing C N?
RE.??tiv ?o
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal iag rt '--'"
Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), peck here. s
Lift?
II. Applicant Informations
DE ,L .q-
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Kristin Knight, Environmental Scientist, KCI Technologies, Inc
Mailing Address: Landmark Center II Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd
Ralei0i. NC 27609
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: kknightna,kci.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
e
k ?
III. Project Information
S, ? to `fi&Ev cih4&#NAarly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that.
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Harrell Stream Restoration Project
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 3882-98-0552
4. Location
County: Edgecombe Nearest Town: Battleboro
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Travel toward Rocky
Mount on US 64 E. Take the US 301 Bypass exit and head north on US 301 for about 7.5
miles. Upon reaching Battleboro, turn right on E. Battleboro Avenue, which becomes
Battleboro-Leggett Rd. Once on Battleboro-Legett, you will drive past the first turn-off for
Morning Star Church Rd on the left, but continue to the second Morning Star Church Rd
turn-off on your left after about 5 miles from Battleboro (the road loops around). Go about 1
mile and turn right onto a dirt road (farm path) opposite Benson Farm Rd on the right.
stream restoration site will begin as the stream exits the culvert under Morning Star Church
Rd and comes onto the Harrell Property.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.021962 ON 77.690301 °W
6. Property size (acres): 22.0 acres (Conservation Easement)
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Swift Creek
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 6 of 12
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The stream has been channelized since at least 1948 in order
to maximize agricultural use on the property. The entire site is cleared and under agricultural
production at this time. The land is farmed right up to the top of bank and there are no
vegetated riparian buffers. The project watershed is primarily agricultural and there is low
development pressure in the area.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
project will restore the appropriate dimension pattern, and profile to 6,338 existing linear
feet of stream using a natural channel design approach. A bulldozer, front-end loader on
tracks, a dump truck and/or a track hoe will be used to restore the channel.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This project is part of a Full Delivery Project
(FDP) for the Ecosystem Enhancement Pro am (EEP). As a result of the stream restoration
water quality will improve with the establishment of intact riparian buffers Terrestrial and
aquatic habitat will be expanded and will connect to the forested corridor along Swift Creek
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Section 404 and 401 Water Quality permits were requested and obtained
for a wetland restoration project that impacted 0.24 acre of ditches to the northeast of the
proposed stream restoration project. The USACE Action ID for the permit is SAW-2006-40345-
233 with an application date of August 14, 2006 and an issuance date of August 16, 2006 The
DWQ Project Number is 06-1334 with an application date of August 16, 2006 and an issuance.
date of September 25, 2006.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
Page 7 of 12
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: This project will restore 6,338 linear
feet of existing; stream on an unnamed tributary to Swift Creek.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. -For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial Intermittent?
? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length

(linear feet) Area of
Impact

(acres)
1 UT to Swift Creek Restoration Perennial 7.6 6,338 1.11

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 6,338 1.11
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8 of 12
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of
Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake,
Pand estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 1.11
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 1.11
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 6,338
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ® No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and.include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
This project will restore a channelized, incised stream to _a stable stream system with a vegetated
riparian buffer. The project stream presents an ideal opportunity to improve water quality and
create valuable terrestrial and aquatic habitat in the Coastal Plain.
Page 9 of 12
I
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams. -
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed. _ -
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USAGE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stn-ngide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
-Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse),.15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact I Required
Zone Multiplier
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Page 11 of 12
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ? No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes,. dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
This is a Full Delivery Project for NCEEP.
A_ P
•
Applicant/Agent's
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
t
t
n
x

a
a
8
3
e
W
r
Hilbross
HALIFAX
BERTIE
NASH
EDGECOMBE
MARTI N
WILSON \ f PITT
?6?
Harrell Stream Restoration Vicinity Map wwwra?
Roads
N
Stream Easement W KCI
?E
ASSOCIATES OF NC
?i Major Streams and Rivers s
1:63,360
KCI Municipalities 1 inch equals 1 miles
TECHNOLOGIES Counties 1 0.s 0 1 Ew?? NoLcQm
Miles AND CONSn2UCnON, INC.
Edgecombe County, North Carolina

lj 7 _ u
46.
Aiir_
t
Price
ife
_„E- ?" -
ME_ t --
f 11 fJ/7 _ ..i 1 k -
r'? _ ? •IItN, U ?? ? p J
2S
Harrell Stream Restoration Topographic Image
AN KCI
"_,!- E ASSOCIATES OF NC
Project Site Boundary S
KCI 1:24,000
1 inch equals 2,000 feet
TECHNOLOGIES 2,000 1,000 0 2,000
Source: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Whitakers, 1961 Feet ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
AND CONSIRI1CilON, INC.
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER 6
DgA
Ra
W a
-'
a. DgAk , t

F

` ?
• 4
? ? of

Y Aft
'
• -r
.
M .,
y'

a ?l"t • RR
.. a
.,@ . `
?
?

rf

K

ti 4
IM
RE I

P i.

,
x
T
i
.

r
?. y,n
a 72
W

r
i
te, •4K'q?+i?'`c ?

d
. m

y y1
1?a? %'x
r
; •
t JW `
r
„~r
iF
f
U r ,
e :: y S,

xbX .'rlfJh 1_rff pby?a?

U.,-s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEL-.k,*S
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW-2006-40345-233 County: Edgecombe USGS Quad: Whitakers
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: KCI Technologies, Inc. attn: Steve Stokes
Address: Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone No.: 919 783-9214 x 187
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): 22.3 acres of agricultural land draining to
Swift Creek, just east of the intersection of SR1415 (Morningstar Church) and SR 1414 Benson Farm), six miles
northeast of Rocky Mount, NC.
Description of projects area and activity: Fill approximately 0.24 acres (3,485 linear feet by 3 foot wide) agricultural
drainage ditch bottoms to raise water table.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions. The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization
under any NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the'permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Jamie Shern at 919 876-8441 x 31.
Corps Regulatory Official
Date: 8/16/06
Expiration Date of Verification:
Page l of 1
?O? pG
D -c
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 25, 2006
DWQ Project # 06-1334
Edgecombe County
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property: Harrell Wetland Restoration Site
Swift Creek [030302, 28-78-(2.5), C, NSW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Sir or Madam:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 0.24 acres of wetland to perform a wetland restoration at the site as described
within your application dated August 14, 2006, which was received by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on August 17, 2006. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts
are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3495 (GC3495). The Certification(s)
allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW27 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the
protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 213 .0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply
with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non-discharge regulations. Also, this approval
to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your
application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAIVIA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
401 OversightlExpress Review Permits Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nor thCarolina
'Nat"ali'm
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
KCI Technologies
Page 2 of 4
September 25, 2006
Amount Approved (Units) Reference
404/Wetland 0.24 (acres) PCN page 8 of 12
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan in the Central Office in
Raleigh at 919-733-1786 or Eric Kulz in the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office at 919-791-4200.
AWK/cbk/Um
Enclosures: GC 3495
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
DLR Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files

Sincerely,
414
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Filename: 061334Hanell WetlandRestorationSite(Edgecombe)101

WQC #3495
STREAM RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT AND STABILIZATION AND WETLAND AND
RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND CREATION ACTIVITIES CERTIFICATION
GENERAL CERTIFICATION FOR STREAM RESTORATION ENHANCEMENT AND
STABILIZATION PROJECTS AND WETLAND AND RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND
CREATION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING THOSE ELIGIBLE FOR CORPS OF ENGINEERS
NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 13 (BANK STABILIZATION) AND 27. (WETLAND AND
RIPARIAN RESTORATION AND CREATION) AND REGIONAL PERMIT 197800080
(CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BULKHEADS)
This General Certification is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401, Public
Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Regulations in 15A NCAC 2H .0500 and 15A NCAC 2B .0200 for the discharge of fill
material to waters as described in 33 CFR 330 Appendix A (B) (13) and (27) of the Corps of
Engineers regulations (i.e. Nationwide Permit Numbers 13 and 27) and Regional Permit
197800080. The category of activities shall include stream bank stabilization or stream
restoration activity as. long as impacts to waters or significant wetlands are minimized. This
Certification replaces Water Quality Certification (WQC) Number 3399 issued March 2003. This
WQC is rescinded when the.. Corps of Engineers reauthorize Nationwide Permits 13 or 27 or
Regional Permit 197800080 or when deemed appropriate by the Director of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ).-
The State of North-Carolina,c'ertifies that:the specified. category of activity will not violate
applicable portions- of Sections 301,-302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217
if conducted in accordance with the conditions set forth.
Conditions of Certification:
1. Wetland and/or riparian area restoration and creation projects which are for
compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit (and not including
projects that only involve stream restoration or enhancement work described in
condition nos. 2 and 3 below) that are proposed under this General Certification
require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality. All
applications for written DWQ approval will be reviewed and a response will be
prepared within 30 days of stamped receipt of the application in the Division of
Water Quality's Central Office in Raleigh. This 30-day period does not include time
spent by the application or DWQ's response within US Postal Service or North
Carolina's Mail Service Center mail systems;
Wetland and riparian area restoration and creation projects (not including projects
that involve work in or impacts to streams) which are not for compensatory
mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit proposed under this General
Certification do not require written application to and approval from the Division of
Water Quality. In these cases, the applicant is required to notify the Division in
writing with three copies of project specifications before the impact occurs. If the
Division determines that the project would not result in an ecologically viable wetland
and riparian area, then the Division shall prepare a response to notify the applicant
in writing within 30 days of DWQ's receipt of the notification. In such cases, the
applicant will be required to submit a formal application and pay of the appropriate
fee, and DWQ will be required to process the application through normal
procedures;
2. Proposed stream restoration projects (as defined and limited below), that do not
disturb wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit do not require written application to and approval
WQC #3495
from the Division of Water Quality, and, therefore, do not require payment of an
application fee to the Division of Water Quality. Projects that are intended for
compensatory mitigation or compensatory mitigation credit, that are intended to
resolve a violation, or that are in association with a development project shall require
an application, fee, and written concurrence from the Division of Water Quality.
Stream restoration is defined as the process of converting an unstable, altered or
degraded stream corridor, including adjacent riparian zone and floodprone areas to
its natural or referenced, stable conditions considering recent and future watershed
conditions. This biological and chemical integrity, including transport of water and
sediment is produced by the stream's watershed in order to achieve dynamic
equilibrium. The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three
copies of detailed restoration plans and specifications before the impact occurs. If
the Division determines that the project does not meet the above definition of stream
restoration, then the Division shall notify the applicant in writing within 30 days of
receipt of the application. In such cases, the applicant will be required to submit a
formal application and pay of the appropriate fee, and DWQ will be required to
process the application through normal procedures;
3. Stream enhancement projects (as defined and limited below), that do not disturb
wetlands and that are not being conducted for compensatory mitigation or
compensatory mitigation credit and do not include any stream channel relocation, do
not require written application to and approval from the Division of Water Quality,
and, therefore, do not require payment of an application fee to the Division of Water
Quality. Projects that are intended for compensatory mitigation or compensatory
mitigation credit, that are intended to resolve a violation, or that are in association
with a development project shall require. an application, fee, and written concurrence
from the Division of Water Quality.
4. Stream enhancement is- defined as the process of implementing stream
rehabilitation practices in order to improve water quality and/or ecological function.
These practices must only be conducted on streams that are not experiencing
severe aggradation or erosion. Stream enhancement does not include the relocation -
of the stream channel. Stream enhancement bank stabilization techniques include
the use of woody vegetation as the primary means of long term stability, and "soft"
techniques such as root wads that encourage the establishment of dense woody
vegetation. Stream enhancement techniques do not typically include the use of
stream bank or bed hardening techniques such as rip-rap or other rock, gabion,
block or concrete structures. However, enhancement activities may also include the
placement of in stream habitat or grade control structures such as cross vanes, j-
hook vanes, and wing deflectors that do not affect the overall dimension, pattern, or
profile of a stable stream.
The applicant is required to notify the Division in writing with three copies of detailed
enhancement plans and specifications before the impact occurs if the stream
enhancement project disturbs greater than 500 feet of stream bank or if the project
proposes the use of in stream structures. If the Division determines that the project
does not meet the above definition of stream enhancement, then the Division shall
notify the applicant in writing with an explanation within 30 days of receipt of the
notification to require application and payment of the appropriate fee;
5. Stream stabilization projects that include the use of any structure or fill in the existing
stream bed or disturb greater that 500 feet of stream bank that are proposed under
this General Certification require written application to and approval from the
Division of Water Quality.
WQC #3495
Stream stabilization is defined as the in-place stabilization of an eroding stream
bank using measures that consist primarily of "hard" engineering, such as but not
limited to concrete lining, rip rap or other rock, and gabions. The use of "hard"
engineering will not be considered as stream restoration or enhancement;
6. Impacts to any stream length in the Neuse, Tar-Pamlico or Randleman River Basins
(or any other major river basins with Riparian Area Protection Rules [Buffer Rules] in
effect at the time of application) requires written concurrence for this Certification
from DWQ in accordance with 15A NCAC 28.0200. Activities listed as "exempt"
from these rules do not need to apply for written concurrence under this
Certification. New development activities located in the protected 50-foot wide
riparian areas (whether jurisdictional wetlands or not) within the Neuse and Tar-
Pamlico River Basins shall be limited to "uses" identified within and constructed in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0200. All new development shall be located,
designed, constructed, and maintained to have minimal disturbance to protect water
quality to the maximum extent practicable through the use of best management
practices;
7. In order for the above conditions to be valid, any plans not requiring written
concurrence to use this Certification must be built according to the plans provided to
the Division of Water Quality. If written concurrence is required, then the project
must be built and maintained according to the plans approved by the written
concurrence•and Certification from the Division of Water Quality;
8. Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment k
Control Planning and Design Manual" or "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual"
whichever is more appropriate (available from the Division of Land Resources at the
DENR Regional and Central Offices) shall be designed, installed and maintained
properly to assure compliance with-the appropriate turbidity water quality standard
(50 NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTUs in.
all saltwater classes and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTUs in DWQ-classified trout
waters);
9. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the original grade restored after the Division of Land Resources or
delegated program has released the project;
10. Any rip-rap shall be of such a size and density so as not to be able to be carried off
by wave or current action and consist of clean rock or masonry material free of
debris or toxic pollutants. Rip-rap shall not be installed in the streambed except in
specific -areas required for velocity control and to'ensure structural integrity of bank
stabilization measures. If rip-rap is to be installed within the streambed, the amount
and location must be approved in writing by the Division of Land Resources and
Division of Water Quality. However rock vanes, wing deflectors, and.similar
structures for grade control and bank protection are acceptable;
11. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact
with freshwaters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
12. If an environmental document is required, this Certification is not valid until a Finding
of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision is issued by the State
Clearinghouse;
WQC #3495
13. Additional site-specific conditions may be added to projects which require written
concurrence under this Certification in order to ensure compliance with all applicable
water quality and effluent standards;
14. Projects with any impacts to streams, wetlands, and/or waters that have received a
Notice of Violation from the Division of Land Resources and/or the Division of Water
Quality are required to submit a complete application and receive written
concurrence to use this Certification regardless of the proposed impact amount to
streams, wetlands, and waters;
15. Concurrence from DWQ that this Certification applies to an individual project shall
expire three years from the date of the cover letter from DWQ or the notification sent
to DWQ;
16. Standard Erosion and Sediment Control Practices:
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices:
a. Erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed;: operated;°and maintained in accordance with the most recent version
of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion. Control Planning and Design
Manual.
b. Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements
specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites,
borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor-owned or
leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained. in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. Reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
e. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
17. No Impacts Beyond those in Application
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall
be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules
occur.
18. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to
the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project.

WQC #3495
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth by a specific project shall result
in revocation of this Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil
penalties.
The Director of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality may require submission of a formaF=
application.for Individual Certification for any project in this category of activity if it is determined
that the project is likely to have a significant adverse effect upon water quality including state or
federally listed endangered or threatened aquatic species or degrade the waters so that existing
uses of the wetland or downstream waters are precluded.
Public hearings may be held for specific applications or group of applications prior to a
Certification decision if deemed in the public's best interest by the Director of the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality.
Effective date: 31 December 2004
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
By
Ole
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
WQC # 3495
5
__I --
1 -1 Michael F. Easley, Governor
Cif VdAI'_9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`M? QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Q Division of Water Quality
September 13, 2005
TPBRRO#05-244
County: Eagecombe
KCI Assoc. of NC
Landmark Center II
Suite 200
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attn: Mr. Steven Stokes
BASIN:
Neuse River Tar-Pamlico X
(15A NCAC 2B .0233) (15A NCAC 2B.0259)
Complaint NOV Buffer Determination X
Incident # Appeal Call
Project Name: Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration Site (KCI Project # 12054239)
Location/Directions: located off of Morning Star U approx. six miles NE of Rocky Mount
Subject Stream: UT to Swift Creek
Date of Determination: 7/27/05
Feature Start Buffer
GPS Points (if
provided) End Buffer Stream
Form Appeal
Call Located
on Soil
Survey Located on
USGS
Topographic
X Subject X X
2 Not Subject X
3 Not Subject X

Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center %WEP';R phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile (919),571-4718 1-877-623-6748
marren Stream at wevana restoration tilte (KU Nroject 9 1;M4239)
9113/2005
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire five (S) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing do Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Wedands/40l Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by tire DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an ad judicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory
appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of
this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150.3 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 2 76 9 9-6 71 4. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
The (owtier/fulure owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
Michael Horan
Enviromaental Spec. I

CC: Jean Maneule, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Office
Debbie Edwards-Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
Fite Copy
Central Files
Cam
Price, 7 7
-0,•r4 . ? p , •. _ _ ,' - ' sus ? m?a.e ? J ? -..':'-?, ? . as '
•'`$qy. ... :??a ,. o\I? '_ (`f ?•a asas ? ? _._: .. '(•?? x ^:-I - \?xsa?,sss?,u ?aaaa:
?yy ^ +,_ it p
\ -?..../.'?...r. ssz a¢n.?s ?S y 7 1^?.? l ?(/)/ (,ti ' Ij. b•9A
.7F.Ll ? a, p4N r ?. p ?` ? L ?f J / .`. OVa - 1 O v ? /???A ? mr• .;? \ ?.` ; r. { r' •
ffi '''" ?.l A Qa, alai +0 y" 1 1 i eAdpit :.? 11( rs s..s'yo
7w.
^? l\ \.• s? ,?-'i. ? ?" \ 1
?\• ? :.? ? aa,m,>.q ?x 1 ?Ag•) ?96 *?J 1?? ,? s,sa ? x 1 1 _ ???
,, - 0f.mm{,?m,?!?'l? ?.-•' I w-: •\ ,.vim . . ?\- ? ' 1 l \ ?" . \.` 00 I . , X69.
77
40
\ -
1184
.t / .. /l ?? ??^ S? / p S-1 • r 5M.. / All 5; ,?^ I'?y, a \ / eH J ?1-
1 \' %
ti
f?'ARBORO 1.-62560) wRENOALE 2 Ml. 401
30"
SCALE 1:24000
I # 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
1 5 0 I KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET MC'
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL Q 1 I 'IS'"
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL. SURVEY
DENVER, COLORADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092
A FOLDER DESCR119NG TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS tS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA - SHEET NUMBER, 6'
Ra Re DgA -??
GoA Vag Y/as TaS
AY31? ^,? ? ? D&t SIS
Ra GoA Nc6 TaS
j \.
'tom---- `?.
GOA
y rL .
r NoB A A AaA ` AaA ?•
Ra
was M. RO Me
yl r1OB No Y
A OBA:
`
? was w aA N013 was Ce8 rar
AuS Nob CeB TaS
1 Ra `Va8 Be RO Ro %
Sta Cc.
1$5, NoA hio8 We
o; Ra m a ^io tVaB //J AaA me
J NoA NcB `Y ?.
GoA DgA TaB
r yob Re
Ra • G°A ? 4 'aG SiB
„Lu Me
GOA GoA NaA 3yC
Au6 a? `'
NoB
AaA We MB,,
?S Pe St6
NoA Aue
t NoA NOB / . 9m Ste AaA
dt4 WaB ?G CeB ?g
WaC 0s O
tyo$ ..._ i `NaB G? to ?a
Noc o
,r AuB Nos Was Ma6 Nob 9 is AaA ;c Ma
Wee -
0. r? ?< Tab h.
Re MoA Ra DgA
NoA Nob RO Me x .
Bs A. Re 1 .c
??• GoA 1 Op8 AeA
WaB
paA AaA .- a Pt; TaS
S? Pu .? . CeB. 9^
DOA
b VMS NoA + Ma8 Pu Ca AaA
WeB
Bn6 \
Nog St6
Ro
Au6 ? Aa } - .? r f
GoA GOA Ra Wa8,• Aa
NOA Q Y Ro Og4 '.a 9
was Ra Wa; ,? gA
o?MfaB• -
?Aue t- 41
s./ Re BBi r - 3M n t p Me
WaB GoA `, yyag
We StB Ce8
StB
-G r AaA AM
sv3 \ L , N08 RO Me
+ NOB Y D
We; ti. StB
1GOA
0gA
Ro NoA Re
09A
VV s ..
Ra .- ` r. We- Ro rx ....-- / Ta
?..r 1 Dg,.
>.a' rw s AaA k6.. ASIA / St8 ® D8A Ste
J? AaA
, • 'Ste D A RD We
' RO W $ T
C r
AaA DgA
DSA
DpB
04 ., A
-m o a Lu Ste ' \ X
Wh i' Ro
? t ida W
? Ro : Te . T AaA St6" e6 ca . DQA
l 3i i4 ti 0 3 Mite
5 000 4 000 3 000 2000 1000 0 5 000 Feet
Peale, 1 20000
M;v?- IN cj,----
KCI
TECHNOLOGIES
Transmittal Letter
F7
ENGINEERS ? SURVEYORS ? SCIENTISTS ? CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
LANDMARK CENTER II, SUITE 220 ? 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ? RALEIGH, NC 27609 ? 919-783-9214 ? (FAX) 919-783-9266
UP ono-?331}vz PAYMENT
Date: April 4, 2007 RECEIVED
Company: North Carolina Division of Water Project: Harrell Stream Restoration
Quality
Contact: Cynthia Van Der Wiele Subject: 401 Permit Application
? In accordance with your request ? For your use/files
? For your review ? Please call when ready
® For processing ? Please return to this office
? Plans reviewed and accepted ? Approval requested
? Plans reviewed and accepted as noted ? Conference requested
? For revision by you at your convenience
Comments: We have made the changes to the stream plans per our discussion at the pre
application meeting on 3/30/2007. We created water quality treatment areas at the bottom
of the ditches (see Stream Plan Sheets 3-8). The areas are also described in the Restoration
Plan at the bottom of page 11. Please contact me if you have any more questions.

DENR . , .
I MID KIRI M'YrS4E.P 5RANCA
faistin Knight
Environmental Scientist
cc: File
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988
Dto - 133L{ U 2,
Harrell Stream and Wetland
Restoration Plan
- Edgecombe County, North Carolina
SCO Contract No. D05025-1
KCI Project No. 12054239
-

Prepared for:
NCDENR-EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
- r~
FkaoffTfmemebt
- PROGRAM
Prepared by:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
KCI
TECHNOLOGIES
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Project Manager
[e-mail]
NN? Y 7 f • '7 '1
919-783-9214
April 2007 1 1
. ?I2Alt?F!

1:2

a
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Site is located in the Coastal Plain in Edgecombe County,
North Carolina. The project will mitigate stream and wetland impacts within the 8-digit hydrologic
cataloging unit 03020101 in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin by restoring 6,987 linear feet on an Unnamed
Tributary to Swift Creek (UTSC) and 15.0 acres of Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland
community.
a The project watershed drains toward the southeast with a contributing area of approximately 0.69 square
mile (441 acres) at the downstream limits of the site. Approximately 387.2 acres drain to the UTSC while
49 56.9 acres drain to the project wetland site. The surrounding area is predominately rural and has low
development pressure at this time. Overall, the project watershed is about 94.6% agriculture, 4.2% forest
and 1.2% rangeland.
The stream has been channelized and straightened since at least 1948. Currently, the entire site is under
agricultural production and the fields are cultivated right up to the top of the stream banks. The existing
project stream is 6,338 linear feet. There are no remaining vegetated buffers or in-stream features in the
channel and the banks are nearly vertical. The channel can be characterized as having poor streambed
variability and habitat diversity.
Two reference reaches were used for this project to develop dimensionless ratios: a headwater reach of
the Mitchell River in Surry County, North Carolina and North Prong Creek in Durham County, North
Carolina. The Mitchell River reference site is classified as a "B4c" channel and morphological data from
- this reference stream were used for the design of Reach 1 of the UTSC. The North Prong Creek reference
reach was classified as a narrow width/depth ratio C5 stream type and was used to design Reaches 2, 3,
and 4 on the UTSC.
The proposed wetland restoration site is located northeast of the UTSC and consists of 15.0 acres of
drained hydric soils currently used for agriculture. The area has been ditched and drained since at least
1948 and jurisdictional hydrology no longer exists on the site. The wetland site is adjacent to a forested
- wetland buffer along Swift Creek and restoration of the site has the potential to increase the amount of
connected wetland habitat. A suitable reference wetland was not found for this wetland site. KCI will use
the description of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp by Schafale and Weakley as a surrogate
vegetative community as needed.
The primary goals for this project are:
• Protect aquatic resources from excess nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants coming from the
agricultural watershed.
• Reestablish a functional Coastal Plain Small Swamp Stream wetland complex that creates
terrestrial and aquatic habitat and connects to the existing floodplain corridor along Swift Creek.
The objectives that must be accomplished to reach these goals are:
• Restore 6,987 linear feet of stable stream channel with the appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension that can support a sand transport system.
• Connect the stream to a functioning floodplain.
• Fill and plug ditches in the drained hydric soils to restore saturated hydrologic conditions for 59%.o
of the growing season.
lain Small Swamp Stream along the UTSC ripa an
• Plant tree species typical of a CoasJ&L
corridor and floodplain as well as in the restored wet an --;;g?-
(9(W, 47_)6?<,:
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration
Reach 1 will be restored using a Priority 3 approach. At this site, the width/depth ratio will be increased
and the bank slopes cut back within the existing channel. A B5c channel will be created with a sinuosity
of 1.03 for 1,265 linear feet of stream.
Reaches 2, 3, and 4 cover the remainder of the stream and will be restored using a Priority 2 approach.
The restoration will establish a bankfull channel with a new floodplain and the design bankfull stage will
equal the new floodplain elevation (bank height ratio = 1.0). A C5 channel morphology with a sinuosity
ranging from 1.05-1.27 will restore 5,114 linear feet of existing stream to 5,722 linear feet of restored
channel.
In order to further protect the UTSC from agricultural run-off, water quality treatment areas will be
installed at the base of the ditches that drain to UTSC. These areas will store and treat a portion of the
run-off before it reaches UTSC.
The sediment regime in the UTSC is dominated by sand and dune/anti-dune processes need to be allowed
to function in order to maintain stability in the channel. If there are impediments to these shifting sand
processes, the sand can become more turbulent and form powerful waves throughout the channel. For
this reason, a limited number of stream structures will be installed in the restored reaches. Only two riffle
grade control structures and three log drop structures will be used throughout the stream.
In order to restore the wetland, the existing ditch network will be plugged and filled to block water from
leaving the site. Ditch plugs will be placed in the four ditch outlets. In addition to blocking the major
outlets from the site, KCI will also recreate wetland microtopography to form small depressions and rises
throughout the site that resemble the minor variations found in a natural wetland system.
To complete the project, both the stream and wetland sites will be planted with species consistent with a
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp community. Trees will be planted at a density of 436 trees per acre
(10 feet by 10 feet spacing) to achieve a mature survivability of 320 trees per acre.
Both the stream and wetland restoration sites will be monitored to evaluate project success. For the
stream, monitoring shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream stability and riparian/stream bank
vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established restoration
objectives. The wetland site will be deemed successful once hydrology is established and vegetation
success criteria are met.
ii
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration
TABLE OF CONTENTS

a
a
1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION ....................................................1
2.1 Directions to Project Site ............................................................................................................1
2.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations ................................... ..1
3.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ...............................................................................1
3.1 Drainage Area ........................................................................................................................... ..1
3.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality ............................................................................. ..2
3.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................................... ..2
3.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends ......................................................................... ..3
3.4.1 Historical Resources ................................................................................................. ..3
3.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential ...................................................................... ..3
3.5 Endangered/Threatened Species ............................................................................................... ..3
3.6 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... ..3
3.7 Potential Constraints ................................................................................................................. ..4
3.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary .......................................................................... ..4
3.7.2 Site Access ................................................................................................................ ..4
3.7.3 Utilities ..................................................................................................................... ..4
3.7.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass ..................................................................................... ..4
4.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) ................................................ ..4
4.1 General Site Description ........................................................................................................... ..5
4.2 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, and Profile) .......................................................... ..5
4.3 Channel Stability Assessment ................................................................................................... ..5
4.4 Bankfull Verification ................................................................................................................ ..5
4.5 Stream Vegetation ..................................................................................................................... ..6
5.0 REFERENCE STREAMS ...................................................................................................... ..6
5.1 Mitchell River Reference Site ................................................................................................... ..6
5.2 Mitchell River Watershed Characterization .............................................................................. ..6
5.3 North Prong Reference Site ...................................................................................................... ..7
5.4 North Prong Watershed Characterization ................................................................................. ..7
6.0 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS (EXISTING CONDITIONS) ............................................ ..7
6.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands ............................................................................................................. ..7
6.2 Hydrologic Characterization ..................................................................................................... ..7
6.2.1 Groundwater Modeling ............................................................................................. ..8
6.2.2 Surface Water Modeling ........................................................................................... ..8
6.2.3 Hydrologic Budget for Restoration Site ................................................................... ..8
6.3 Soil Characterization ................................................................................................................. ..9
6.3.1 Taxonomic Classification ......................................................................................... ..9
6.3.2 Profile Description .................................................................................................... ..9
6.3.3 Soil Properties ........................................................................................................... 10
6.4 Wetland Plant Community Characterization ............................................................................. 10
7.0 REFERENCE WETLAND .................................................................................................... 10
8.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN ............................................................................ 10
8.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................................. 10
8.1.1 Designed Channel Classification .............................................................................. 11
8.1.2 Target Plant Communities ........................................................................................ 12
8.2 Sediment Transport Analysis .................................................................................................... 12
8.3 Wetland Hydrologic Modifications ........................................................................................... 13
8.3.1 Narrative of Modifications ....................................................................................... 13
iii
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration
8.4 Natural Plant Community Restoration ......................................................................................13
8.4.1 Stream Riparian Planting ..........................................................................................13
8.4.2 Wetland Planting ......................................................................................................14
8.4.3 On-Site Invasive Species Management ....................................................................15
9.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ..............................................................................................15
9.1 Stream Stability .........................................................................................................................15
9.2 Stream Riparian Vegetation ......................................................................................................16
9.3 Wetland Hydrology ...................................................................................................................16
9.4 Wetland Vegetation ...................................................................................................................16
9.5 Schedule/Reporting ...................................................................................................................17
10.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................19
Tables
Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives ....................................................................23
Table 2. Drainage Areas ..................................................................................................................23
Table 3. Land Use of Watershed .....................................................................................................23
Table 4. Morphological Design Criteria ..........................................................................................24
Figures
Figure 1. Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions ................................................................................................ 28
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed ...................................................................................................... 29
Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soil Survey ......................................................................................... 30
Figure 5. Project Watershed Land Use ............................................................................................. 31
Figure 6. Project Site Floodplain Map .............................................................................................. 32
Figure 7. Existing Hydrologic Conditions ........................................................................................ 33
Figure 8. Reference Reach Vicinity Map (Mitchell River) .............................................................. 34
Figure 9. Reference Reach Watershed (Mitchell River) ................................................................... 35
Figure 10. Reference Reach Vicinity Map (North Prong Creek) ....................................................... 36
Figure 11. Reference Reach Watershed (North Prong Creek) ............................................................ 37
Stream Plan Sheets
Plan Sheet 1 Title Sheet
Plan Sheet IA General Notes and Project Legend
Plan Sheet 2A Details: Stabilization
Plan Sheet 2 Details: Cross-Section
Plan Sheets 3-8 Plan and Profile
Plan Sheets 15-20 Planting Plan
Wetland Plan Sheets
Plan Sheet 1 Title Sheet
Plan Sheet 2 Site Plan
Plan Sheet 3 Mitigation Plan
Plan Sheet 4 Planting Plan
Plan Sheet 6 Details
r-

iv

i

a
a
w
F-7
r
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Historical Aerial Photographs
Correspondence
Conservation Easement
Project Site Photographs
Existing Conditions Data
Reference Reach Data
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Wetland Budget
v
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration
L
i

a
r--
a
vi
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
• 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Site is a full-delivery project developed for the North
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) to mitigate stream and non-riparian wetland impacts
within the 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit 03020101. The project will restore 6,987 linear feet on an
Unnamed Tributary to Swift Creek (UTSC) and 15.0 acres of Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland
community. This restoration plan presents the existing site and watershed conditions, the restoration
design criteria, the design summary, and the proposed monitoring protocol.
2.0 PROJECT SITE IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION
2.1 Directions to Project Site
The HPRS is part of a 319-acre parcel owned by Mr. Floyd and Mrs. Ernestine Harrell. The site is
located approximately six miles northeast of Rocky Mount, North Carolina in Edgecombe County (Figure
1). The latitude and longitude of the project site are 36.0201 North and 77.6807 West (WGS1984).
To reach the site from Raleigh:
Proceed east on U.S. Route 264-East/64-East (US 264E/64E) for approximately 17 miles. Continue on
US 64E for another 30 miles. Take the U.S. Route 301 Bypass and then U.S. Route 301 (US 301) north
into Battleboro. Turn right on E. Battleboro Avenue, which becomes Battleboro-Leggett Road. Continue
past the first turn onto Morning Star Church Road on the left just outside of town. Go about 5 miles and
turn left onto the second Morning Star Church Rd (the road loops around). Go one mile and turn right
onto a dirt road opposite Benson Farm Rd. The stream restoration site will begin as the stream exits the
culvert under Morning Star Church Rd.
2.2 USGS Hydrologic Unit Code and NCDWQ River Basin Designations
The Unnamed Tributary to Swift Creek (UTSC) is a second-order perennial stream that flows west to east
for approximately 6,338 linear feet once on the Harrell property. The stream drains into Swift Creek
approximately 500 linear feet after leaving the project site.
The project site is situated within the 03020101 (Tar-Pamlico 01) Watershed Cataloging Unit (8-digit
HUC) and the 03020101130090 Local Watershed Unit (14-digit HUC). It is within the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Subbasin 03-03-02. In the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program's (EEP) Tar-Pamlico River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan, the Swift Creek
watershed has not been identified as a high priority, Targeted Hydrologic Unit.
3.0 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION
The project watershed is a small agricultural drainage in the inner Coastal Plain as seen in Figure 2. The
surrounding topography is characterized by flat bottomlands and gently rolling hills. The elevation in the
project watershed ranges from 65 to 119 feet above mean sea level.
3.1 Drainage Area
The project watershed drains toward the southeast with a contributing area of approximately 0.69 square
mile (441 acres) at the downstream limits of the site. The project stream has a total drainage area of 387.2
acres while 56.9 acres drain to the project wetland. The UTSC enters Swift Creek at a point
approximately 7.8 miles upstream of the confluence with the Tar River as seen in Figure 3. The project
area is located in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Whitakers Quadrangle.
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration •
a
3.2 Surface Water Classification/Water Quality
The NCDWQ assigns surface water classifications in order to help protect, maintain, and preserve water
quality. For the water resources classification, Swift Creek, as the receiving waters, was used to
characterize the UTSC. The section of Swift Creek just downstream of the project area (28-78-(2.5)) is
listed as a Class C and Nutrient Sensitive Water (NSW). The NCDWQ reduced the bioclassification of .
Swift Creek in 2002 from excellent to good, listing constricted flow as the reason for the downgrade.
This reduced flow has led to lower dissolved oxygen levels in the stream.
Class C waters are protected for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life
propagation and survival, agriculture, and other uses suitable for Class C. Secondary recreation
includes wading, boating, and other uses involving human body contact with water where such
activities take place in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. There are no restrictions
on watershed development or types of discharges
Nutrient Sensitive Water (NSW) is a supplemental classification intended for waters needing
additional nutrient management due to their being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or
macroscopic vegetation. In general, management strategies for point and nonpoint source
pollution control require control of nutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus usually) such that
excessive growths of vegetation are reduced or prevented and there is no increase in nutrients
over target levels. Management strategies are site-specific (NCDENR, DWQ 2006).
3.3 Geology and Soils
The site lies within the Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces ecoregion of the Coastal Plain a
physiographic province. The area is referred to as the inner Coastal Plain and is characterized by more
relief than the outer Coastal Plain. The underlying sediments of the site are from the Yorktown
Formation and Duplin Formation Undivided. The Yorktown Formation is described as fossilferous clay
with varying amounts of fine-grained sand, bluish gray, shell material commonly concentrated in lenses w
and is found mainly in areas north of Neuse River. The Duplin Formation is described as shelly, medium
to coarse-grained sand, sandy marl, and limestone, bluish gray, mainly in area south of Neuse River
(NCGS 1985).
The project watershed primarily intersects the soils in the Roanoke-Conetoe-Portsmouth association,
which is described as nearly level and gently sloping, very poorly drained, poorly drained, and well-
drained soils that have a clayey to sandy subsoil. These associated soils are typically found on broad
flats, smooth to slightly rounded ridges, or depressions. The predominant soil series in the project
watershed are Altavista fine sandy loam, Cape Fear loam, Dogue fine sandy loam, Norfolk loamy sand,
Rains fine sandy loam, and Roanoke loam (Figure 4). Altavista fine sandy loam consists of a brown fine
sandy loam surface layer and a sandy clay loam to sandy loam subsurface. The Cape Fear loam has a
black loam surface layer and clay loam to sandy clay loam subsurface. Dogue fine sandy loam has a
brown fine sandy loam surface and clay to sandy clam loam subsoil. The Norfolk loamy sand series has a
brown loamy sand surface and sandy clay loam subsoil. The Portsmouth fine loamy sand has very dark
gray fine sandy loam surface layer and sandy loam to sandy clay loam subsoil. The Rains fine sandy
loam has a surface layer of very dark gray fine sandy loam and gray sandy clay loam subsoil. The
Roanoke loam has a surface of dark grayish brown loam and gray clay to sandy clay loam subsoil
(USDA, SCS 1979).
2
. Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
3.4 Historical Land Use and Development Trends
3.4.1 Historical Resources
Historical aerial photographs were obtained from the Edgecombe County Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) office in order to more effectively assess the existing site conditions. All available aerial
. photographs were reviewed in order to create a chronology of land disturbance. Aerial photographs of the
site were obtained from 1948, 1954, 1964, 1971, 1979, 1998, 2002, and 2005 (Appendix A).
In 1948, the northern portion of the stream site contains agricultural land while the southern portion along
the stream is forested. The stream had already been straightened at this point. The wetland area had also
been converted to agriculture by this time, which included a series of drainage ditches in place across the
site. In 1954, the subject property shows little change from the 1948 conditions.
In 1964, the subject property closely resembles the 1954 conditions, but the southwest and southeast
portions of the wetland area are forested. In 1971 and 1979, the subject property closely resembles the
1964 conditions.
The entire property has been cleared by 1998 and is under agricultural production. The drainage features
are largely unchanged from the conditions in 1948. In 2002 and 2005, the subject property closely
resembles the 1998 conditions; no significant differences are discernable.
The stream channel shows the same observable pattern from 1948 up until its current condition. No
changes in either the stream valley or stream channel within the project area were observed in the
historical aerial photographs. Therefore, any alterations to the stream channel occurred prior to 1948. No
significant changes have occurred in the project area since 1948.
3.4.2 Land Use and Development Potential
The project watershed is 441 acres in size as seen in Figure 3. The surrounding area is predominately
rural and has low development pressure at this time. Overall, the project watershed is approximately
94.6% agriculture, 4.2% forest and 1.2% rangeland based on the North Carolina GAP land use
classification using 1992 and 1993 aerial photography (McKerrow 2003).
. 3.5 Endangered/Threatened Species
KCI requested a formal review by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) in July 2005 to
evaluate the presence of any rare species, critical habitat, and priority natural areas on the project site and
to determine the potential impact of the proposed project on these resources. In their findings letter dated
July 11, 2005 (Appendix B), the NCNHP indicated "no record of rare species, significant natural
communities, or priority natural areas at the site or within a mile of the project area". In addition, no
threatened or endangered species were identified in the project area during the existing conditions site
assessment. Also, a formal review by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was
requested in July 2005, but no correspondence was returned.
3.6 Cultural Resources
To evaluate the presence of significant cultural resources on the subject property, KCI requested a formal
review at the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO). The formal SHPO review dated July 18, 2005 found no historic properties within the project
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
area (see Appendix B). The formal review by the State Archaeology Office identified no potential
archaeology sites on or around the subject property.
3.7 Potential Constraints
KCI investigated any potential site conditions that could hinder restoration activities. They were
documented during the field investigation and are summarized below.
3.7.1 Property Ownership and Boundary
The project site is located on a single private property owned by Mr. Floyd and Mrs. Ernestine Harrell of
6444 NC Highway 42, Tarboro, North Carolina, 27886. KCI facilitated the acquisition of a conservation
easement to be held by the State of North Carolina on the area identified for stream and wetland
restoration. The conservation easement boundary (plat with legal description) has been included in
Appendix C.
3.7.2 Site Access
There will be one access point to the project site off of Morning Star Church Road at the northwestern
corner of the project site. This is a legal access point guaranteed with an ingress/egress easement. During
the restoration of the stream and wetland components, construction equipment will be able to maneuver
up and down the site as necessary.
3.7.3 Utilities
There are no utilities located on the project site.
3.7.4 FEMA/Hydrologic Trespass
The UTSC and the wetland restoration site are both located within the 100-year floodplain (Zone AE) of
Swift Creek and a downstream portion of UTSC is within the floodway of Swift Creek (Figure 6). As
such, any modifications that would result in the increase of the 100-year flood elevation would require a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). It is the intent of the restoration design to maintain the
existing 100-year flood elevations. A proposed hydrology and hydraulics (H&H) summary will be
submitted with a letter indicating that an increase in the 100-year flood elevation is not anticipated (No-
Rise Certification).
A conditional floodplain model is being developed by using detailed topographic survey from the
construction drawings completed for the restoration project. This conditional model will be revised to
reflect changes to the channel and floodplain as the result of restoration (proposed model).
The proposed project reach is entirely contained within the Harrell property. The restoration of the
project reach is not anticipated to produce hydrologic trespass conditions on any adjacent properties.
4.0 PROJECT SITE STREAMS (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
A field assessment was conducted in April 2006 to document existing conditions and to aid the
development of an appropriate design for the stream restoration. The existing stream channel, ditches,
ponds, wetland, and drained hydric soils at the project site are illustrated in Figure 7 and documented in
the site photographs (Appendix D). Observations and collected data are summarized below and presented
in Appendix E. The site was revisited several times from April 2006 to January 2007 to take further
4
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
measurements. Portions of the ditch network are displayed on the USGS quadrangle as a blue line stream,
but a consultation with the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicated that only the main channel
. of the UTSC was a jurisdictional waterway (see Appendix B).
4.1 General Site Description
• The UTSC flows from west to east and drains approximately 387 acres of agricultural land into Swift
Creek. The stream begins from a ridge at the top of the small watershed and flows for approximately
1,700 feet through farmland until the project reach begins. The project begins at Station 10+00 as the
stream exits a culvert that goes under Morning Star Church Road. It then travels through agricultural
fields on the Harrell property. Once the UTSC leaves the project boundary, it travels approximately 500
linear feet through a forested bottomland before reaching Swift Creek.
The existing project stream is 6,338 linear feet and has been ditched extensively since at least 1948 as
seen in historic aerial photographs. There are no remaining vegetated buffers or in-stream features in the
channel. The banks are nearly vertical and are cut up to the top of the bank for agricultural production.
Several culverts convey water under agricultural crossings. At this time, sediment, nutrients and
agricultural chemicals have direct access to the watercourse and can be deposited directly into Swift
Creek. Fine sediments from the eroding stream banks and inputs from adjacent agricultural fields are also
affecting water quality. The channel can be characterized as having poor streambed variability and
habitat diversity.
4.2 Channel Morphology (Pattern, Dimension, and Profile)
A Rosgen Level III assessment was conducted to collect existing stream dimension, pattern, and profile
data and determine the degree of channel instability. Channel cross-sections and profiles were surveyed
at ten representative locations along the UTSC. Bed materials were sampled with pebble counts at seven
of these ten locations. Data developed from these surveys are presented in Appendix E and a summary of
existing channel morphology is shown in Table 4.
4.3 Channel Stability Assessment
A qualitative stability assessment was performed to estimate the level of departure from a stable stream
system and to determine the likely causes of channel disturbance.
a The UTSC is deeply incised as it enters the Harrell Property from the culvert under Morning Star Church
. Road. Cross-section #1, which is approximately 830 feet downstream of the beginning of the project, had
a bank height ratio of 1.8 at the time of assessment. Further downstream, cross-sections #2 through #7
had bank height ratios ranging from 1.4-1.8. The stream has eroded down to a clay bottom and does not
have regular access to the floodplain. Starting at Cross-section #8, the channel is not as incised and has
bank height ratios from 1.0 to 1.2. The existing channel slope also decreases in this reach as the stream
nears the end of the project. At the end of the project, the UTSC is affected by backwater from Swift
Creek and has received large sediment deposits during storm events.
4.4 Bankfull Verification
The standard methodology used in natural channel design is based on the ability to select the appropriate
bankfull discharge and generate the corresponding bankfull hydraulic geometry from a stable reference
system(s). The determination of bankfull stage is the most critical component of the natural channel
design process.
5
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
Bankfull can be defined as "the stage at which channel maintenance is most effective, that is, the
discharge at which moving sediment, forming or removing bars, forming or changing bends and a
meanders, and generally doing work that results in the average morphologic characteristics of the
channels" (Dunne and Leopold 1978). Several characteristics that commonly indicate the bankfull stage
include: incipient point of flooding, breaks in slope, changes in vegetation, highest depositional features
(i.e. point bars), and highest scour line. The identification of bankfull stage, especially in a degraded a
system, can be difficult. Therefore, verification measures were undertaken to facilitate the correct
identification of the bankfull stage on the UTSC.
To verify bankfull stage at UTSC, regional hydraulic geometry relationships (regional curves) were used.
Regional curves are typically utilized in ungauged areas to approximate bankfull discharge, area, width,
and depth as a function of drainage area based on interrelated variables from other similar streams in the
same physiographic province. Regional curves and corresponding equations from Harman et al. were
used to approximate bankfull in the project reach (1999). Based on the regional curves, a bankfull
discharge and cross-sectional area of 62 ft3A and 15 ft2 would be anticipated at the bottom of the project
reach.
4.5 Stream Vegetation
Currently, there is no riparian vegetation at the project site. Agricultural fields are farmed right up to the
top of bank along the entire length of the stream.
5.0 REFERENCE STREAMS
A reference reach is a channel with a stable dimension, pattern, and profile within a particular valley
morphology. Reference reaches are used to develop dimensionless morphological ratios (based on
bankfull stage) that can be extrapolated to disturbed/unstable streams to restore a stream of the same type
and disposition as the reference stream (Rosgen 1998). Two reference reaches were used for this project:
a headwater reach of the Mitchell River in Surry County, North Carolina and North Prong Creek in
Durham County, North Carolina.
5.1 Mitchell River Reference Site
A headwater reach of the Mitchell River was surveyed by the North Carolina State University Water
Quality Group in February 2003. The reference site is located in the northwestern portion of Surry
County as seen in Figure 8. The reach was classified as a B4c channel at this location and morphological
data from this reference stream were used for the design of the upper portion of the UTSC. .
The water surface slope and dimensions at this reference reach made it suitable for developing
dimensionless ratios for the upper portion of UTSC. Morphological data are presented in Table 4, but no
representative cross-sections, profile, or pebble counts were available.
5.2 Mitchell River Watershed Characterization
The watershed for the Mitchell River headwater reach is located in Alleghany and Surry counties in
northwestern North Carolina (Figure 9). It is part of the 14-digit hydrologic unit code 03040101080010
in the Yadkin River Basin and the NCDWQ subbasin 03-07-02. The 6.0-square mile watershed is
approximately 92% forest and 5% rangeland (McKerrow 2003). The UTMR is located in the Southern
Crystalline Ridges and Mountains ecoregion in the Blue Ridge physiographic province. Elevations in the
watershed range from 1,470 to 3,148 feet above mean sea level.
6
. Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration

r 5.3 North Prong Reference Site
A stable section of North Prong Creek, a second order stream located in Durham County, was selected as
the reference reach for the downstream portion of the restoration project (Figure 10). Approximately 400
S linear feet (20 bankfull widths) of North Prong Creek were surveyed by KCI in October 2002. This reach
has a sediment regime similar to the UTSC. Likewise, the valley slope (0.23% compared to 0.24% at the
project site) and sediment distribution (d50 of 0.2 mm compared to 0.4 mm) of the reference site are very
. similar to that of the project site. North Prong Creek is located in the Piedmont instead of the Coastal
Plain physiographic region, but no other appropriate C5 reference was found in the Coastal Plain.
The North Prong Creek reference reach was classified as a narrow width/depth ratio C5 stream type.
. Collected morphological data as well as representative photographs of the reference site are provided in
Appendix F. The measured morphological variables and dimensionless hydraulic geometry relationships
developed to facilitate the restoration design are provided in Table 4.
5.4 North Prong Watershed Characterization
North Prong Creek is located in southern portion of Durham County, North Carolina and is in the 14-digit
hydrologic unit 03030002060140 within the Cape Fear Basin. The stream was surveyed just upstream of
the point where it drains into Northeast Creek. The watershed for North Prong Creek contains
approximately 3.15 square miles (Figure 11). It is found in the NCDWQ 03-06-05 subbasin. The
reference reach is located in the Triassic Basins ecoregion in the Piedmont physiographic province.
The portion of the stream used as a reference is found approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the
intersection of Interstate 40 and State Highway 55. The elevation in the reference reach watershed ranges
from approximately 258 to 408 feet above mean sea level.
6.0 PROJECT SITE WETLANDS (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
The proposed wetland restoration site is located northeast of the UTSC and consists of 15.0 acres of
S drained hydric soils currently used for agriculture (Figure 7). A series of drainage ditches runs through
the proposed wetland site and it drains everything to the east, which inhibits the formation of saturated
conditions on the site. The area has been ditched and drained since at least 1948 and jurisdictional
hydrology no longer exists on the site. The wetland site is adjacent to a forested wetland buffer along
Swift Creek and has the potential to increase the amount of Coastal Plain connected wetland habitat.
0 6.1 Jurisdictional Wetlands
A wetland delineation was performed at the site in June 2006 using the methods set out by the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USAGE 1987). There were no existing wetlands except for those that had formed in
the bottoms of the drainage ditches (Appendix G). The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a
permit allowing these wetlands to be filled, because the site will be returned to a functioning wetland.
6.2 Hydrologic Characterization
There is a system of drainage ditches throughout the wetland project site as seen in Figure 7. These
waterways drain both surface and groundwater from the site and have allowed agriculture to take place
despite the poorly drained soils and flat site topography.
F-1
7
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
6.2.1 Groundwater Modeling
The numerous modifications to the hydrology of this area have effectively drained the wetland. The
development of a network of ditches up to three feet deep has halted the influence of flooding on the area.
The effect of ditching on wetland hydrology was evaluated in DRAINMOD using: the NRCS model Map
Unit Users File (MUUF) for Roanoke soil; the daily rainfall and daily maximum and minimum
temperatures for Rocky Mount and Tarboro for the period from 1950 to 2004 (National Climatic Data
Center); and the Edgecombe County growing season (21 March to 11 November). This analysis
concluded that the existing ditch network has removed jurisdictional hydrology from the evaluated areas.
6.2.2 Surface Water Modeling
KCI performed an analysis of surface water inputs in order to differentiate between riparian and
nonriparian wetlands. The floodplain boundaries from DFIRM maps developed by the North Carolina
Floodplain Mapping Program were used to interpolate the extent of the Swift Creek 5-year floodplain.
This analysis showed that the 5-year floodplain from Swift Creek extends to 74 feet above mean sea level
in this location. This elevation defined the boundary of the nonriparian wetland restoration site for this
project.
6.2.3 Hydrologic Budget for Restoration Site
Existing Conditions
Existing site hydrology was modeled by developing an annual water budget that calculates hydrologic
inputs and outputs in order to estimate the change in storage on a monthly time step (Appendix H).
In order to set up the water budget, historic climatic data were obtained from the North Carolina State
Climatic Office. The weather station Tarboro 1 S (318500) in Tarboro, North Carolina was used, because
it is the nearest station with daily precipitation and temperature records. The station is located
approximately 12 miles to the southeast of the Harrell Site. Monthly precipitation totals from the entire
period of record (1948-2005) were reviewed and three years were selected to represent a range of
precipitation conditions: dry year (1988), average year (1977), and wet year (1989).
Potential inputs to the water budget include precipitation, groundwater, and surface inputs. For
precipitation, the data from the three selected years were used in the budget. Groundwater input likely
exists, but was considered negligible in comparison to the magnitude of surface and precipitation inputs.
Surface water input was calculated using the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) runoff curve
number equation (USDA, SCS 1986).
Outputs from the site include potential evapotranspiration (PET), groundwater, and surface water outlets.
PET was calculated by the Thornthwaite method using mean monthly temperatures determined from the
chosen years of record: 1988, 1977, and 1989. Groundwater represents losses from the site due to
downward seepage through the soil profile and was assumed to be 2x10-6 ft/min (1.04 inches per month),
which is typical of low permeability soils associated with wetlands. A substantial amount of water is also
lost through the existing ditches on-site. A DRAINMOD model was set up to simulate the effect of the
existing drainage network on wetland hydrology. The program evaluated 40 years of available
precipitation data and produced the annual loss due to the ditches for the three selected years.
Once the inputs and outputs were determined, a net monthly total was calculated in inches and used to
estimate a yearly water budget. The model assumes unsaturated conditions at the beginning of the year.
A maximum wetland water volume of 4.68 inches was calculated based on the specific yield of 0.13 for
36 inches of Roanoke soil in order to analyze conditions in the upper three feet of the soil profile. The
. Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
. resulting hydrographs for the average, dry, and wet years show a seasonal pattern. The model shows that
the majority of hydrologic inputs to the site come during the rainy spring months. The site begins to lose
saturation in the upper twelve inches in the summer months. The late fall sees an increase in hydrologic
inputs again. The dry year shows very little wetland hydrology overall.
Proposed Conditions
A modified water budget was developed to analyze the effect of restoration actions on the site hydrology.
. The loss of water from the existing ditches was removed from the calculations, because these ditches will
be filled and no longer carry water off the site. To estimate the impact from recreating wetland
microtopography, an additional two inches of hydrologic capacity was added to the calculations. Based
on these changes, the budget shows a noticeable increase in the spring. In particular, the wet year has
wetland hydrology throughout almost the entire year. The dry year does not show much change from the
existing to proposed budget, which indicates that during a drought year the wetland may not experience
consecutive saturated conditions expect during the first months of the growing season. The normal year
. is predicted to have saturation during the earlier part of the growing season with occasional dry periods
during the late summer months.
6.3 Soil Characterization
A soils investigation at the proposed wetland restoration site was conducted by a certified soil scientist
from KCI to determine the extent and distribution of the hydric soils and to classify the predominate soils
. to the soil series level. The investigation consisted of delineating the hydric soil boundaries with pink
flagging in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers (1987). Areas that were identified as
possible hydric soil mapping units were surveyed at a higher intensity until the edge of the mapping unit
was identified. The boundary of the hydric and non-hydric soil mapping units were then followed by
continual sampling and observations as the boundary line was identified and delineated. In those areas
where the boundary was found to be a broad gradient rather than a distinct break, microtopography,
landscape position, soil textural changes, redoximorphic features, and depleted matrices were additionally
. considered to identify the extent of the hydric soils.
To develop a detailed soils map, several soil borings were advanced on the site in the general hydric soil
areas identified by landscape position, vegetation and slope. Once the hydric soil borings were identified,
the soil scientist marked the point and established a visual line to the next auger boring where again
hydric soil conditions were confirmed by additional borings. The soil scientist moved along the edges of
the mapping unit and marked each point along the line. To confirm the hydric soil mapping unit, soil
borings were advanced to a depth of 50 inches. The soil profile descriptions identified the individual
horizons in the topsoil and upper subsoil as well as the depth, color, texture, structure, boundary, and
evidence of restrictive horizons and redoximorphic features. The extent of the mapped hydric soils is
shown in Figure 7.
6.3.1 Taxonomic Classification
The soil type at the wetland restoration site is Roanoke loam series, which is classified as a fine, mixed,
semiactive thermic Typic Endoaquult.
6.3.2 Profile Description
The Roanoke loam series is described as a poorly drained silt loam that forms in fluvial sediments on
. stream terraces. The series consists of very deep, slowly permeable or very slowly permeable soils that
have a moderate shrink-swell potential. Slopes are typically 0 to 2 percent. Mapped areas of the Roanoke
series in Edgecombe County range from 4 acres to more than 100 acres. Typically, the surface layer is
9
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
dark grayish brown loam and 8 inches thick. Organic matter content is medium and there is also a high
available water capacity in the surface layer. The seasonal high water table is at or near the surface. The
subsoil is typically 44 inches thick with gray clay loam in the upper portion, gray clay in the middle part,
and gray sandy clay loam in the lower area. The underlying material up to 90 inches is gray coarse sand
(USDA, SCS 1979). The series is listed by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as a
hydric soil.
6.3.3 Soil Properties
The Roanoke series has a saturated hydraulic conductivity from 0.06 to 2.0 inches/hour. The percent
organic matter is approximately 0 to 2.0% and the bulk density is in the range of 1.20 to 1.65 g/cc
(USDA, SCS 1979).
6.4 Wetland Plant Community Characterization
The wetland restoration site is currently under seasonal agricultural production. There is no wetland
vegetation in the farmed area. The bottoms of the ditches do contain hydrophytic species such as cattail
(Typha latifolia), water primrose (Ludwigia spp.) and knotweed (Polygonum spp.), but there are no
woody species within the restoration site.
7.0 REFERENCE WETLAND
A suitable reference wetland was not found for this project. KCI contacted several landowners with
potential reference wetland sites, but none were willing to allow their land to be used for an initial survey
and groundwater monitoring. KCI will use the description by Schafale and Weakley as a surrogate
vegetative community as needed (1990).
8.0 PROJECT SITE RESTORATION PLAN
Approximately 6,987 linear feet of stream and 15.0 acres of Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp wetland
will be restored at the Harrell Site. The restored stream and wetland will provide a buffer between the
existing functioning wetlands along Swift Creek and the agricultural activities in the local watershed.
8.1 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives
The ecological diversity and water quality at the Harrell Site are significantly limited under the existing
conditions. This project aims to restore terrestrial and aquatic habitat and to improve water quality by
reestablishing stable fluvial geomorphic features, wetland hydrology, and native Coastal Plain vegetation.
The primary goals for this project are:
• Protect aquatic resources from excess nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants coming from the
agricultural watershed.
• Reestablish a functional Coastal Plain Small Swamp Stream wetland complex that creates
terrestrial and aquatic habitat and connects to the existing floodplain corridor along Swift Creek.
The objectives that must be accomplished to reach these goals are:
Restore 6,987 linear feet of stable stream channel with the appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension that can support a sand transport system.
Connect the stream to a functioning floodplain.
10
. Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
. • Fill and plug ditches in the drained hydric soils to restore saturated hydrologic conditions for 5%
. of the growing season.
• Plant tree species typical of a Coastal Plain Small Swamp Stream along the UTSC riparian
corridor and floodplain as well as in the restored wetland.
8.1.1 Designed Channel Classification
. The UTSC has been channelized and extensively disturbed as a result of agricultural use. Both Priority 2
. and Priority 3 approaches will be used to restore this stream. The division of reaches and priority types
can be seen in Table 1.
. Reach 1 extends from Stations 10+00 to 22+65, which is the first 1,224 linear feet of existing channel. A
Priority 3 approach was used within the existing stream corridor and belt width with adjustments made to
the stream pattern and dimension (Rosgen 1997). The width/depth ratio will be increased and the banks
. sloped back to establish the appropriate entrenchment ratio for the design channel. A B5c channel will be
created with a sinuosity of 1.03 for 1,265 linear feet of stream. The Mitchell River Headwaters provided
the reference morphological criteria and hydraulic geometry relationships from which the proposed
design was based (Table 4).
Reaches 2 (22+65-37+30), 3 (37+30-52+90), and 4 (52+90-79+87), which cover the remainder of the
stream, will be restored using a Priority 2 approach (Rosgen 1997). This method involves reestablishing
. a natural profile, planform, and cross-section on the existing channel elevation. The restoration will
create a bankfull channel with a new floodplain and the design bankfull stage will equal the new
floodplain elevation (bank height ratio = 1.0). The new channel will meander within an approximate belt
width of 45 to 100 feet as determined by criteria from the reference reach. Grading will be conducted to
. establish a floodplain and the appropriate cross-sectional area. A total of three stream crossings will be
maintained for the landowner to allow access across the easement to agricultural lands. A C5 channel
morphology with a sinuosity ranging from 1.05-1.27 will restore 5,114 linear feet of existing stream to
5,722 linear feet of restored channel. North Prong Creek was the reference site used to develop the
morphological criteria and hydraulic geometry relationships that were the basis for the proposed stream
dimension, pattern, and profile.
The sediment regime in the UTSC is dominated by sand (Appendix E). In a predominantly sand system,
the bed is mobilized during storm events, because small sand particles move during turbulent flow.
Typical pool and riffle features do not exist in a sand system. Instead, these features shift as sand dunes
build up and break down throughout the channel. The dune/anti-dune processes maintain stability in the
channel. If there are impediments to these shifting sand processes, the sand can become more turbulent
and form powerful waves throughout the channel. For this reason, a limited amount of stream structures
will be installed in the restored reaches. Both Reach 2 and Reach 3 will receive one riffle grade control
structure, which will stabilize sections of the profile where the channel will need to be built up to a certain
elevation. Three log drop structures will be placed in Reach 3; these structures are designed to provide
grade control and stability (refer to the details on Stream Plan Sheet 2). The log drop structures will also
be more typical of in-stream habitat found in a small Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp complex.
In order to promote dune/anti-dune processes in the channel, a gravel/sand starter bed will be installed
over the existing clay bed in reaches 2, 3, and 4. Approximately 0.2 foot of pea gravel overlaid with 0.3-
0.5 foot of sand will be placed in the channel. The profile will be constructed 0.5-0.7 foot lower to
accommodate this increase in elevation once the starter bed is in place.
• Seven agricultural ditches will still flow into the UTSC. In order to improve the quality of the ditch
drainage entering the stream, water quality treatment areas will be constructed within the new floodplain.
11
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
These areas will consist of shallow depressions that will slow and treat water before it enters the stream.
These features are shown in Stream Detail Sheet 2. The inlet and outlets to the water quality treatment
areas will be strengthened with rock stabilization. A depression of six inches or less will be graded to
provide storage and treatment of the ditch run-off before it reaches the UTSC. A total of six water quality
areas will be installed along the UTSC where ditches join the stream. A larger channel that enters the
stream from the southwest corner of the project will not receive a water quality treatment area. This
straightened channel receives drainage from an approximately 100-acre watershed and has an intermittent
flow regime. An in-line detention structure would influence the flow characteristics of the channel and
therefore the channel will remain free-flowing. A vegetated riparian buffer will be established adjacent to
this feature within the easement boundary. All of the water treatment areas will be planted with native
species as described in Section 8.4.1.
Coir fiber matting, seeding, and mulching will be used to provide temporary stabilization on the newly
graded stream banks and live stakes will be planted to provide long-term rooting strength.
8.1.2 Target Plant Communities
The design vegetative community for both the restored wetland and the UTSC is a Coastal Plain Small
Stream Swamp (Brownwater subtype) as described by Schafale and Weakley (1990). This community
type fits into the natural topography of the project watershed. The Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp is
characterized by a variable canopy, which can be dominated by combinations of bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica), and various bottomland hardwoods such as swamp chestnut
oak (Quercus michauxii), Shumard oak (Q. shumardii), cherrybark oak (Q. pagoda (falcata var.
pagodaefolia)), laurel oak (Q. laurifolia), black oak (Q. nigra), willow oak (Q. phellos), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), sycamore (Platanus occidentalus), river birch
(Betula nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), black willow (Salix nigra), and swamp cottonwood
(Populus heterophylla). Understory species include American hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana),
Carolina ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), American holly (Ilex opaca), and red maple (Acer rubrum).
8.2 Sediment Transport Analysis
The UTSC is a sand-dominated system and sand channels have a unique transport process where particles
are suspended in the water column during turbulent flows. During fully turbulent flow, all of the sand can
move, but this is rarely the case. In partial transport scenarios, there is a complex relationship between
the sand being suspended and the sand slowly depositing back on the bed.
Sand streams have thick plane beds during low flow conditions. Bed variations (pools) only result from
scenarios (i.e., objects in the stream) that would induce local scour. At high flows, dunes form and they
move downstream by eroding their faces and re-depositing downstream. At bankfull flows, these dunes
can wash out causing the plane bed to reform at a lower elevation with the volumetric difference in
sediment moving downstream in suspension. During extreme conditions, standing waves can form, and
the undulations can extend to the clay streambed forming anti-dunes. The migration of anti-dunes
upstream consequently forces the waves with them. In the proposed restoration, this process provides the
mechanism by which sediment transport will occur and provide bed heterogeneity.
Sand channels must have adequate capacity to allow dunes to form and move. This design capacity is
related to the available sediment supply. The agricultural nature of the watershed and the existing
sediment sampled in the channel suggest the availability of sufficient sediment to support this design
system. These "reference transport conditions" were limited in the project stream but are quite common
and visible in many stable and quasi-stable channels in the Coastal Plain. The shape of the rigid
streambed and the thickness of sand in the reference sections serve as the criteria for the design of the
12
. Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
. restoration reaches. The hydraulics of similar sections associated with the sand beds allows for scaling of
the parameters for the restored reaches.
. The design channels in Reaches 2 - 4 will be a C5 type with silt/clay banks. The channel will be
. excavated approximately 0.5-0.7 foot below the finished grade elevation and backfilled with a small
gravel/sand bed (0.2 foot gravel/0.3-0.5 foot sand) providing the mechanism for the dune formation. The
dunes will serve as the primary resistance in the channel until vegetation establishes. The starter bed will
. allow for normal dune function immediately following construction and will help to prevent bed
degradation and erosion. The design slope associated with the pattern layout has been sized to
accommodate the sand transport processes. As has been previously discussed in Section 8.1.1, several
. rigid structures have also been designed to serve as grade control and compliment the sand channel
design.
8.3 Wetland Hydrologic Modifications
The restoration of wetland hydrology will focus on removing the ditch network that drains off all excess
surface water and groundwater within the upper horizons. The restoration actions are shown on the
. Wetland Plan Sheets.
8.3.1 Narrative of Modifications
. To restore the wetland, the existing ditch network will be plugged and filled to block water from leaving
the site. Ditch plugs will be placed in the four existing ditch outlets. At the downstream end of the
wetland site, a rock-stabilized outlet will be installed to prevent the channel from reforming. In addition
. to blocking the major outlets from the site, KCI will also recreate wetland microtopography. The site will
be graded to form small depressions and rises throughout the site that resemble the minor variations in
elevation found in a natural wetland system. These modifications will allow precipitation and overland
flow to remain on the wetland site. The removal of the ditches will also raise the groundwater level.
8.4 Natural Plant Community Restoration
. 8.4.1 Stream Riparian Planting
On the restored stream banks, live stakes will be used in conjunction with the native herbaceous seed mix
. to provide natural stabilization. Appropriate species identified for live staking include:
Silky dogwood Corpus amomum
Black willow Salix nigra
. Elderberry Sambucus canadensis
A herbaceous seed mix composed of the appropriate native species will also be developed and used to
. further stabilize and restore the riparian and bank zones.
Riparian plantings shall consist of native woody species. KCI will plant 436 stems per acre (10 feet by 10
feet spacing) to achieve a mature survivability of 320 stems per acre. Plant placement and groupings will
. be randomized during installation in order to develop a more naturalized appearance. Woody vegetation
planting will be conducted during dormancy. Species to be planted in the floodplain area will consist of
at least five of the following:
River birch Betula nigra
Beautyberry Callicarpa americana
13
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
Sugarberry
Persimmon
Green ash
Sycamore
Swamp chestnut oak
Willow oak
Possumhaw viburnum
Celtis laevigata
Diospyros virginiana
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Platanus occidentalis
Quercus michauxii
Quercus phellos
Viburnum nudum
Species to be planted in the riparian area leading up from the floodplain may consist of the following:
Shagbark hickory Carya ovata
Black walnut Juglans nigra
Southern red oak Quercus falcata
8.4.2 Wetland Planting
Plantings shall consist of native species commonly found in Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
communities and will be planted at a density of 436 trees per acre (10 feet by 10 feet spacing) to achieve a
mature survivability of 320 trees per acre. Plant placement and groupings will be randomized during
installation in order to develop a more naturalized appearance. Woody vegetation planting will be
conducted during dormancy. Tree species to be planted at the wetland site may consist of the following
species. Trees from Zone A will be planted in the lowest, wettest areas of the wetland near the former
outlet. Species from Zone B will likely cover the largest area and consist of a mixture of obligate and
facultative species that will do well in fluctuating water levels. Zone C trees will be planted upper edges
of the wetland.
Zone A
Water hickory Carya aquatica OBL
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW
Water tupelo Nyssa aquatica OBL
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum OBL
Possumhaw viburnum Viburnum nudum FACW+
Zone B
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica FACW
Water tupelo Nyssa aquatica OBL
Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii FACW-
Willow oak Quercus phellos FACW-
Possumhaw viburnum Viburnum nudum FACW+
Zone C
Beautyberry Callicarpa americana FACU-
Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii FACW-
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagoda FAC+
Willow oak Quercus phellos FACW-
14
i
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
8.4.3 On-Site Invasive Species Management
Currently, there are no invasive species present at either the stream or wetland restoration sites, because
both are under agricultural production. No management actions are anticipated at this time.
9.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
Both the stream and wetland restoration sites will be monitored to evaluate project success. For the
stream, monitoring shall consist of the collection and analysis of stream stability and riparian/stream bank
vegetation survivability data to support the evaluation of the project in meeting established restoration
objectives. Specifically, stream success will be assessed utilizing measurements of stream dimension,
pattern, and profile, site photographs, and vegetation sampling. The wetland site will be deemed
successful once hydrology is established and vegetation success criteria are met.
9.1 Stream Stability
The purpose of monitoring is to evaluate the stability of the restored stream. Following the procedures
established in the USDA Forest Service Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson et. al 1994)
and the methodologies utilized in the Rosgen stream assessment and classification system (Rosgen 1994
and 1996), data collected will consist of detailed dimension and pattern measurements, longitudinal
profiles, and bed materials sampling.
Dimension
Fourteen permanent cross-sections will be established and used to evaluate stream dimension. One pool
and one riffle cross-section each will be installed on Reach 1. Reaches 2, 3, and 4 will have three, four,
and five cross-sections, respectively. Permanent monuments will be established by either conventional
survey or GPS. The cross-section surveys shall provide a detailed measurement of the stream and banks,
to include points on the adjacent floodplain, at the top of bank, bankfull, at all breaks in slope, the edge of
water, and thalweg. Subsequently, width/depth ratios and entrenchment ratios will be calculated for each
cross-section.
Cross-section measurements should show little or no change from the as-built cross-sections. If changes
do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether they are minor adjustments associated with settling
and increased stability or whether they indicate movement toward an unstable condition.
Pattern
Measurements associated with the restored channel pattern shall be taken on the section of the stream
included in the longitudinal profiles. These will include belt width, meander length, and radius of
curvature. Based on these values, sinuosity, meander width ratio, radius of curvature, and meander
length/bankfull width ratios will be calculated.
Profile
A total of 3,000 linear feet of profile will be surveyed along the restored stream. Longitudinal profiles
will be conducted on 500 linear feet of Reach 1. An additional 2,500 linear feet of profile measurements
will be completed along reaches 2, 3, and 4. Measurements will include average water surface slopes for
all of the reaches as well as pool and riffle slopes and pool-to-pool spacing for Reach 1. Annual
measurements should indicate stable bedform features with little change from the as-built survey.
Bed Materials
Pebble counts will be conducted at each representative cross-section for the purpose of repeated
classification and to evaluate sediment transport.
15
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
Photograph Reference Points
Photograph reference points (PRP) will be established to assist in characterizing the site and to allow
qualitative evaluation of the site conditions. The location and bearing/orientation of each photo point will
be permanently marked in the field and documented to allow for repeated use.
Cross-section Photograph Reference Points
Each cross-section will be photographed to show the form of the channel with the tape measure stretched
over the channel for reference in each photograph. Effort will be made to consistently show the same
area in each photograph.
Longitudinal Photograph Reference Points
Additional PRPs will be located as needed to document the condition of specific in-stream structures such
as log drop structures.
9.2 Stream Riparian Vegetation
KCI will monitor vegetation for five years following the first growing season. The success of the riparian
buffer plantings will be evaluated using eighteen (2% of the total buffer area) ten by ten meter vegetative
sampling plots. The corners of each monitoring plot will be permanently marked in the field. Data will
be collected at each plot for: total number of stems, species, percent survival, height, estimated percent
cover of all species, and evidence of insects, disease or browsing. Additionally, a photograph will be
taken of each plot and will be replicated each monitoring year. Riparian vegetation must meet a
minimum survival success rate of 320 stems/acre after five years. If monitoring indicates that the
specified survival rate is not being met, appropriate corrective actions such as controlling invasive
species, removing dead/dying plants and replanting will be undertaken. Non-target species must not
constitute more than 20% of the woody vegetation based on permanent monitoring plots.
9.3 Wetland Hydrology
Groundwater elevations will be monitored to evaluate the attainment of jurisdictional wetland hydrology.
Verification of wetland hydrology will be determined by automatic recording well data collected within
the project wetland. Within the restoration area, four automatic recording gauges will be established to
cover a density of one automatic well per four acres. Daily data will be collected from the automatic
gauges over the 5-year monitoring period following wetland construction.
Wetland hydrology will be considered established if well data from the site indicate that groundwater is
within 12 inches of the soil surface for 5% of the growing season during normal weather conditions. The
growing season was taken from COOP Station 318500, which is located in Tarboro in Edgecombe
County. According to the NRCS, the growing season is considered to be the period with a 50%
probability that the daily minimum temperature is higher than 28° F. The growing season for Edgecombe
County extends from March 21 to November 11 for a total of 235 days (USDA, NRCS 2002). Based on
this growing season, success will be achieved at the project site if the water table is within 12 inches of
the soil surface for 12 consecutive days or more during the growing season.
9.4 Wetland Vegetation
The success criteria for the planted species in the wetland restoration area will be based on survival and
growth. Beginning at the end of the first growing season, KCI will monitor vegetation for five years
following the planting.
16

Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
Twelve permanent monitoring plots measuring ten by ten meters will be established in the wetland
restoration area ensuring a 2% monitoring coverage of the total restoration acreage. Plots will be
systematically located to ensure even placement. Data will be collected at each plot for: total number of
stems, species, percent survival, height, estimated percent cover of all species, and evidence of insects,
disease or browsing. Survival of planted species must be 320 stems/acre at the end of five years of
monitoring. Non-target species must not constitute more than 20% of the woody vegetation based on
permanent monitoring plots. Management actions such as controlling invasive species, removing
dead/dying plants and replanting will be undertaken as necessary.
9.5 Schedule/Reporting
The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project
completion. Monitoring shall subsequently be conducted annually for a total period of five years.
Annual monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted after all monitoring tasks for each year are
completed. The report will document the monitored components of the restoration plan (hydrology and
vegetation) and include all collected data, analyses, and photographs. Each report will provide the new
monitoring data and compare the most recent results against previous findings. The monitoring report
format will be similar to that set out in the most recent EEP monitoring protocol.
Variations from the designed stream and wetland can be anticipated due to unknown site conditions,
inputs from outside the restoration site, regional climatic variations, or acts of God, etc. Regular
management activities will be implemented as necessary to ensure that the goals and objectives of the
project are met. These activities will be conducted throughout the year and may include invasive species
control or other management activities. If the monitoring identifies failures in the project site, a remedial
action plan will be developed to investigate the causes of the failure and propose actions to rectify the
problem.
17
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
18
r
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
10.0 REFERENCES
Dunne, T. and L.B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. New York: W.H. Freeman and
Company.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report
Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Harman, W.A., G.D. Jennings, J.M. Patterson, D.R. Clinton, L.O. Slate, A.G. Jessup, J. R. Everhart, and
R.E. Smith. 1999. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships for North Carolina Streams.
Wildland Hydrology. AWRA Symposium Proceedings. Edited by D.S. Olsen and J.P. Potyondy.
American Water Resources Association, Bozeman, MT.
Harrelson, C.C., C.L. Rawlins, and J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: an Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
McKerrow, A. 2003. North Carolina GAP Land Cover. Raleigh, North Carolina: North
Carolina Gap Analysis Project Office.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2004. Tar-Pamlico River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/basinwide/tarpam2004.html
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality. 2006. Surface Water Classification.
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/csu/index.html
NCGS. 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina.
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22: 169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. In: Wang, S.S.Y.,
E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields, Jr. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Conference on Management of
Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision.
Rosgen, D.L. 1998. The Reference Reach - a Blueprint for Natural Channel Design. Presented at ASCE
Conference, Denver, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
3`d Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, NCDEHNR, Division of Parks and
Recreation. Raleigh, NC.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2002. Wetlands
Determination Table (WETS) for Edgecombe County, NC. Created 10/23/2002. Last accessed
September 2006 at ftp://ftp.wcc.nres.usda.gov/support/climate/wetlands/nc/37065.txt
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1979. Soil Survey of Edgecombe
County. Raleigh, NC
19
Restoration Plan Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small
Watersheds. Technical Release 55.
20
a

a
a

Table 1. Project Restoration Structure and Objectives
Harrell Stream Restoration
r ??
Y'?Reacb'
wtorii in Type Priority' Er+sUnr Linear
t= ?: g? aDes?aned Linear
a r w
* e ? z
t . h. > roaches ?KFopta e , ,a.u ?. F
Connects to downstream
Reach 1 10+00 - 22+65 Restoration P3 1,224 1,265
crossing and culvert
Reach 2 22+65 - 37+30 Restoration P2 1,389 1,465 Connects to upstream
crossing and culvert
Begins where large ditch
enters the stream and ends
Reach 3 37+30 - 52+90 Restoration P2 1,231 1,560
at downstream crossing
and culvert
Connects to upstream
Reach 4 52+90 - 79+87 Restoration P2 2,494 2,697
crossing and culvert
Table 2. Drainage Areas
Harrell Stream Restoration
rays r -.
Drainage Area
Reach
(acres) .
Reach 1 (Beginning to first road crossing)
125.9
Reach 2 (First road crossing to confluence with
major ditch 147.1
Reach 3 (From confluence with major ditch to
second road crossing) 271.3
each 4 (From second road crossing to end of
[
project) 387.2
Table 3. Land Use of Watershed
Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration

".Land ti sr`
¢ ° e YUrC. tage of
Acrea en
n +s?Vatersbed
Agriculture 419.9 94.6%
Forest 18.7 4.2%
Rangeland 5.3 1.2%
Wetland 0.2 0.0%
23
Table 4. Morphological Design Criteria
EXISTING
Ref
Ref fPROPµOS?D'
«, r f
.
r ?r
=4 ?
` Y Reach Reach
n .
a5iablcs`:: [
ih
;
+ .
-
Mitchell
Noirth ` r e
i szy
?
l
a

.?„ w 4?
C #
LI 1 tiC2 °
UTSC 3
UTSC4
River
=Prong
tiUTS„C ,
SC 2 ;
;UTS?C 3 y
"yV,TSC 4
I3W

Rosgen Stream Type E5 E5 E5 E5 B4c C5 B5c C5 C5 C5
Drainage Area (mil) 0.197 0.230 0.424 0.605 6.0 3.04 0.197 0.229 0.424 0.605
Bankfull Width (W,,) (ft) 5.4 6.1 7.6 9.5 29.2-35.0 17.8 10 10 12 13.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (dbkf) (ft) 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.5 2.0-2.1 1.5 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.6
Bankfijll Cross Sectional Area
7
3
7
8
11
6
13
8
62
5-68
8
26
2
9
1
11
2
16
8
21.6
(Aber ft
Ab . . . . .
. . . . .
Width/depth Ratio (Wblddbkr) 4.1 4.8 5.0 7.0 13.9-17.5 12.1 11.1 9.1 * 8.6* 8.4*
Maximum Depth (dmbkr) (ft) 2.0 1.9 2.7 2.5 2.7-2.8 3.0 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.3
Width of Flood Prone Area >70 >70 >70 >60 44-64 600+ 18+ 30+ 30+ 30+
W (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio (ER) 13.0 11.1 9.5 7.2 1.3-2.2 33.7 1.8+ 3.0+ 2.5+ 2.2+
Water Surface Slope (S) (ft/ft) 0.004 0.007 0.006 0.0023 0.0084 0.0024 0.0067 0.0023 0.0023 0.0023
Sinuosity (stream length/valley 1** 1** 1 * * l** 1
1 1
28 1.03 1.05 1.27 1.08
length) . .
Pool Depth (ft) ** ** ** ** 2.7 *** 1.5 *** *** ***
Riffle Depth (ft) ** ** ** ** 0.9-1.2 *** 0.9 *** *** ***
Pool Width (ft) ** ** ** ** 27 *** 11 *** *** ***
Riffle Width (ft) ** ** ** ** 8.7-12.3 *** 10 *** *** ***
Pool XSArea (sf) ** ** ** ** 72.5 *** 16 *** *** ***
Riffle XS Area (sf) ** ** ** ** 62.5-68.8 *** 9.1 *** *** ***
o Pool Depth/Mean Riffle ** ** ** ** 1
3-1
4 *** 1
7 *** *** ***
Depth .
. .
d
E
Pool Width/Riffle Width
**
**
**
**
0.9
***
1.1
***
***
***
A -Pool Area/Riffle Area 1.1 1.8
Max pooldepth/dbkf ** ** ** ** 2.0-3.5 *** 2.7 *** *** ***
Low Bank Height/ dmber 2.74 2.30 2.64 1.69 - 3.0 1 1 1 1
Mean Bankfull Velocity 3.27 3.97 3.96 2.20 3.2-5.3 3.1 3.3 2.7 2.7 3.2
s
Bankfull Discharge (Q) 24 31 44-51 20-31 280 83 25-30 25-30 40-45 65-70
(cfs
Meander length (Lm) (ft) ** ** ** ** 140-500 94-143 50-200 100-200 120-240 130-260
Radius of Curvature (R.) ** ** ** ** 70-220 3740 30-80 30-50 40-60 40-70
ft
Belt Width (Wb„) (ft) ** ** ** ** 100-400 158 45-65 45-60 60-100 50-90
6? Meander Width Ratio ** ** ** ** 3.0-14.0 8.9 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10
R./ W bkf Ratio ** ** ** ** 2.0-7.5 2.1-2.3 3-8 3-5 3-5 3-5
L. / W bid Ratio ** ** ** ** 4.0-17.1 5.3-8.0 5-20 10-20 10-20 10-20
Valley Slope 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.0014 0.009 0.0023 0.0069 0.0024 0.0029 0.0025
Average Water Surface
0
004
0
007+
0
006'
0.0023'
0.0084
0.0024
0.0067
0.0023
0.0023
0.0023
Slope . . .
Riffle Slope ** ** ** ** 0.007- *** 0.0085 *** *** ***
0.027
Pool Slope ** ** ** ** 0.0-0.003 *** 0.003 *** *** ***
Pool to Pool Spacing ** ** ** ** 115 400 *** 74-228 *** *** ***
Pool Length ** ** ** ** - *** 26-60 *** *** ***
Riffle Slope/Avg WS
**
**
**
**
0.8-3.2
***
1.27
***
***
***
Slope
Pool Slope/ Avg WS ** ** ** ** 0.01-0.3 *** 0.45 *** *** ***
Slope
l Length/ W bli ** ** ** ** - *** 2.6-6.0 *** *** ***
l to Pool
r
OO ** ** ** ** 1.5-3.8 *** 7.4-22.8 *** *** ***
SPP
---gfWbkf
dth/depth ratio is lower than that typical of a C type stream, but the channel has been designed with greater depth to accommodate the formation of a dune/anti-dune sand system.
* The wi
** The existing stream has been channelized and does not have a natural meander pattern with distinct pool and riffle features.
* ** Sand streams are not characterized by riffle and pool features, but rather by a dune/anti-dune system.
+ Stream slope exceeds valley slope in reaches that are experiencing base lowering more rapidly than the existing valley gradient.

24
a

Hilk Oss
/ HALIFAX
c
a B°
?m
m BERTIE

o o NASH
_ m

1 97

r
EDGECOMBE
MARTIN
o?
.c
8 a
^
`Bg9en w °'
c?
WILSON PITT
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Project Site Location N KC1
Major Streams and Rivers W?E ASSOCIATES OF NC
Municipalities S
K CI 1:63,360
Roads 1 inch equals 1 miles
?
TECHNOLOGIES 1 0.5 0 1
TFETTIMiles m
ENVRtoNMEwx TwHwLoGIEs
AND CONSTRUCnON. INC.
27
Edgecombe County, North Carolina

?1 ?? ? r F .•c-f '? ^. 1. 1 a .l _ ?+-. z ?, 'r' ? _ t? r t
1. L r _.-? r [ )1 ? ??.v?., x«` -=" )? ,e--?,mot, •;s.
? `_ t? ?. y G +" ? ?: ?,._ ? ?`?-+r? -ice y.,: "'y -:' .yg (' ,
~1417 (; a r_i er R - . "` cr
l 1
I? -r \ - w ., , .•y y -w+- #.. NPR `.i S
t ? ti t. ? f . ?? _? ?. „¦,; - ? ?" w .?+'. `'
If u
77
( l G - .aw ,,t.:. ?.
%
%
-''?t"`'"?r'o'v°?`? r?f y -.i-:,1? ?\ i ?? 1 1 -?'a-ltd --'?+• .. ,y _">, .,m,,?.)
' J. ?? ? ^h .''r :yam r ? ? `?.. ..,,,t• ?.-t', w, -yY? .-.? .?. ?'1
ril°.SF?+¦,.?,? r'' 1? '? ?1 a. "'>aL "?" w. ,w - i.
alp- ` t its
•r7' (. { - ;; J `. fir- ..•` .?_` J t t. ?.., . ra : y. _...•_ .db- . ?.:, .
4.-y. 4 ` ", y` . • x 4 ? , ; f..,,` b g,. A ` S•. , :J b, ?, . ,d- h ?u^ /••
'???`°?.; ?t? f `, {r?.h +f ? / f¢??t, ?tFy .? j ?s?.-% ? "___? ..?-?, +^• ? ?v«'..` ;\1 `+? tt
is t ?3? + is e i •? ?,_
t ?:??,? _`ti/ ,, l? f?,1.`- •c- _•1` -?--?.? f%_ _ 4 : ??? Lei ;N,.-.. .r 1 ii l
v_?-
J f ?t 1 yr tt J rr r\ I ? a w` r t ..' }
E tt
` f &a } ? i .? . ran , ( y rk .? n r
E poi' * " y rr:,
71
r » 4 4 f ?? ?? J x \
?tyl 1 r.. ?t t6'?!
UM. .
a f1
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed
MMMM*?? F-1 Stream Project Boundary
Wetland Project Boundary N K C I
¦ ¦ ¦ ASSOCIATES OF NC
¦ ¦ Stream Project Watershed (387.2 acres) w? E
KC a ¦ Wetland Project Watershed (56.9 acres) s
0E ' ¦ 1:24,000
IM 14-digit HUC Boundaries 1 inch equals 2,000 feet
TECHNOLOGIES 2,000 1,000 0 21000 ENvIRONMEwAL TECMNOLOGffS
Source: USGS Topographic Quadrangle Whitakers (1961) Feet AND CONSTRUCnON. INC.
29
erg- _ ? /

E-'4 1 v , NORTHAMPTON
HERTFORD

i

HALIFAX
,
I

FRANKLIN NASH BERTIE

J
?_

EDGECOMBE

MARTIN
WAKE
WILSON
i
1

PITT
JOHNSTON
North Carolina Level IV Lcoregions

REENE
G Mid-Atlantic Flatwoods
WAYNE _
- Mid-Atlantic Floodplains and Low Terraces
- Northern Outer Piedmom
- Rolling Coastal Plain
i

L

END
Soothcastem Floodplain, and I.ow Icrraccs
Figure 2. North Carolina Ecoregions
N KC I
Site Location w E ASSOCIATES OF NC

K
C I County Boundaries s
L633,600
1 inch equals 10 miles
TECHNOLOGIES 10 5 ° 10
Miles NVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
ANC ONSTRUCnON, INC.
28
? ?.` .?}'i1••? ??-??. k ,'113 ? ,??? {;? ? \Ir..,/-"? -.y- ;4F?
j r .s a ??
C?F
.. ' t - PrtCe?i t t ? ? `:\ •? i?i?' "U1g Ss`.- _ _? / ?? \`?? .. - - ., yr
%
\ rI A t _ //
1-7
? ((t ?(. .5^? ? ? ?} l ?5 .}I 1. ? ?. ,aY ?` ?'. U/
%
\t ti, ,:•? \ `y .. f ail S `I "- t I ? ?.... \ 1 `.,i I -
?` , ? X 15 ., ? S 3 y`,• k s ` r I ` ? ` - \ >• S '4-+••. .
?` ," - ?, t t ?; - ?' --?-?o? • ? l ? vii "`? ,.
,? 1• ?.? ?; !? ?-...? .1 ? r: --y ? yr P, ? _ III
,
r
oM., it `r „?.;t l tC ?r
Phi
Figure 3. Project Site Watershed
r Stream Project Boundary
Wetland Project Boundary N K C I
¦ A,,?OCLATES OF KC
Stream Project Watershed (387.2 acres) w?
¦ Wetland Project Watershed (56.9 acres) 5
K C I E
e 1:24,000
7?7?T ("?7 (??' M 14-digit HUC Boundaries I inch equals 2,000 feet -?
TECHNOLOGIES 2,000 1.000 0 1_'000 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
Sourer: USGS Topographic Q-d -angle Whimkarc /196h Fcct AND CONSTRUCTION. INC.
29
Soil Series
AaA - Altavista Fine Sandy Loam, 0 To 3 Percent Slopes NoB - Norfolk Loamy Sand, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes
Ca - Cape Fear Loam NoC - Norfolk Loamy Sand, 6 To 10 Percent Slopes
CeB - Conetoe Loamy Sand, 0 To 4 Percent Slopes Pt - Pits
DgA - Dogue Fine Sandy Loam, 0 To 3 Percent Slopes Pu - Portsmouth Fine Sandy Loam
DpA - Duplin Sandy Loam, 0 To 2 Percent Slopes Ra - Rains Fine Sandy Loam
DpB - Duplin Sandy Loam, 2 To 5 Percent Slopes Ro -Roanoke Loam
GoA - Goldsboro Fine Sandy Loam, 0 To 2 Percent Slopes StB - State Loamy Sand, 0 To 4 Percent Slopes
- MaA - Marlboro Sandy Loam, 0 To 2 Percent Slopes WaB - Wagram Loamy Sand, 0 To 6 Percent Slopes
® MaB - Marlboro Sandy Loam, 2 To 6 Percent Slopes = We - Wahee Fine Sandy Loam
Figure 4. Project Site NRCS Soil Survey
....?
Stream Project Boundary N K C I
Wetland Project Boundary w?E \N,.`" L', I F> OF N`
Project Watershed S
K C I 1:15,000
I inch equals 1,250 feet
TECHNOLOGIES 1,250 622
Ilv?Ri"?"ll?.^f N'AI ?HR`r•l??r;l!'-
Sri!
30
a
0
a

0

x
r? .
¦
¦
Figure 5. Project Watershed Land Use
A, wwmw4w?
Agriculture Project Watershed
- Rangeland ® Project Site Boundary N KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
- Forest Project Stream W E
5
® Wetland Other Streams 1:18,000
KCI
1 inch equals 1,500 feet im
TECHNOLOGIES Source: NC GAP Land Cover Dataset 1,500 750 0 1,500 ENVIRONMENTAL TECNNOLOG1Es
Using Anderson I Classification Feet AND CONSTRUC110N. INC.
31
h ZONE X ZONE X { ct TLi6
ZONE,.AE
h-?,,..
vo,
+_ S I{ ZONE Y, t?k,it
(*
'.'.ZONE. X... `; SI/ ??. ys
r4 ''fit lawda %'?+? i 7)'
ZONE X ZONE t E
ZONE AF •? 1?#dVif,,.,t",qq A 7J s"' l ors a ,
_f__ iv
.'. ZONE X. ?y rfi:y
Ail,
ZONE
ZONE X
N
ZONE X I \'
ZONE X .
. ?3. ZONE X
?Way?'A ZONE X '
?6?
Figure 6. Project Site Floodplain Map
Special Flood Hazard Area Zone X
ldk 10 (Area of 0.2° annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual
(Subject to inundation by chance flood with average depths or less than I foot or T
the M annual annual chance flood) with drainage areas less than 1 square milt; and area. K C li
protected by levees from 1 "/o annual chance flood)
WOMMMM& Floodway Areas in Zone AE n 1A1 FS ell
Stream Project Boundary
K C 1 w?E
1:8,400
Wetland Project Boundary I inch equals 700 feet
TECHNOLOGIES 700 ;?0 0 700 NVRONMENIAL TECHNOLOGIES
Source: FEMA Panels 3882, 3883, 3892, and 3893 Feet ANA' ONSruucnoN INC
32
ry _
Y -.
'_4Vr
r
s l
71,
wall
41 1
rilb I `? ?'
+. ? r
XS
A Y XS7..II+XS 8
.WXS -S -
_ - J
P8
xS 2
` ??Xs 9
i • t P 9
F 2 ids,;
XS?6? P 6 ? I#
S uA y n
P4 XS4
.,
1 14
q- l
P TO
i
loom
e
? a?tn((N 1.? ka?, -
Figure 7. Existing Hydrologic Conditions
0I Project Stream C Stream Gauge
Ditch Cross-Section (XS) K C I
N
Other Streams Stream Profile (P) A.SSOCLATES OF VC
? e
Crossing Drained Hydric Soils (15.0 acres)
K C I I-beam Crossing M Project Site Boundary 1:8,400_
1 inch equals 700 feet
TECHNOLOGIES Irrigation Line 700 3?O Q 700 NVROWAINTAL ECHNOLOGiES Image Source. E<lgeconrbe Counts G/S, 2002 Feet HNC ONSTRUCTION, NC
33
Reference Stream
Surry County, NC
Ash
?Z.
a,
Project Stream C,
Edgecombe County, NC c6
e / SORRY
R a9 0
\v \ COUNTY
)o
I m. O?m
? oc
? e
?r
/Brooks A _? -
y ct d7
ALLEGHANY°is a
COUNTY
i
?itcr"e11? Reference
Reach Location
Z
01
Ridge '? 'ell i .?
a9 ? m ?
.?5ra s
hi a ?'o
e ro 1
°4 ro
g
Lyons WILKES G
r COUNTY
Wolfe
m ?
O? O
Figure 8. Reference Reach Vicinity Map (Mitchell River)'
Reference Reach
Project Location KCI
Roads CIF KC 1= Major Streams and Rivers 1:63,360
County Boundaries 1 inch equals 1 miles
TECHNOLOGIES $Urry County o.s o IM,es E S
I ENVIRONMENTAI TECHNOLOGIES
AND ?'ONSTRUCTION, INC.
34
I`? l\

??-??ii?V?L? ?A•.1??? t 1. 1 ? f ?'? \ ? ? ?I????? ? ;

ire- -- -;?
(tttttt
1
- a?
cou-
i

35
Reference Stream, -
Durham County, NCV11-
? 11 ", \ 1 1 /?_ ? 70
Project Stream (- ?' ° •
Edgecombe County, NC
1 e
i I r
- 751 City of Durham
p<
55,
x.
`V
?-
-.
Reference _I I
Reach Location °
R
I 1
54 ?
s ) i
II I
I DURHAM ?
COUNTY -
- ` 10(
CHATHAM
COON / - WAKE
Jordan t -
? lake • COUNTY ,
I
F7 ri
Figure 10. Reference Reach Vicinity Map (North Prong Creek)
moo
Municipalities Reference Reach N?
Counties ? Project Location KCI
Durham County Major Streams and Rivers ALSSOCL4TES OF NC
Major Roads S Lakes and Reservoirs 1;63,360
Other Roads 1 inch equals 1 miles -
-
TECHNOLOGIES OS 0 Miles ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES
AND CONSTRUCTION. INC.
36 •

I, I71YYY)I s lain- I 11 I l'. ;RGy=L? I f M Z
- Reference Reach
---> ? ? ? (North Prong Creek) ?'-
E A?,? ?N`F RCM ON¢f 5.?? 1/G l
';,? .- ,ice ?,?T` I ? ? R? t?_ry ??. ? i .? _ / ? •??i
'yrl `?R¦ ?? /?I ^ I
rmv
1: i' i:r A ??-
Figure 11. Reference Reach Watershed (North Prong Creek)
Reference Reach Watershed Boundary
14-digit HUC Boundaries KC I
ASSOUM S OF vc
1:36,000 41
K C I s
L]?T(?i (??` C I inch equals 3,000 feet
TE?`l1 OLOGIF.7 S7iJJ UOI t1]Jliic ?llcl[jl clliKlt. 1,000 L, 00 Q 3,000 NVIRONMENTAL-ECNNOLOGIES
lhn ham 1981 I'ee, AND [_ ONSTRUCTION. INC.
ioulin r' -
37
38
'I
•
•

a
a

a
11
M

Stream Plan Sheets
9 6 9 9 9 9 6 6
(CONTRACT D05025-1 KCI JOB# : 12054239

O O N N b WW N N ?. \ I `~ m ,?0'a I'i .2J? car0 O

rn rri

?
:H

t'
O
PSI ? n 1
b yyyyyy b pb n n (7,y.C?
? t
:eir

i? l
,L1
Y' o, "C, N t-athi ?rouy ,
OD 01) co
p
'? 'r

`
.?
< ,
I
,•
k ,. a a
?
,
C
pac tt},ro +}, ?''? ; a
y
7o ppm? s
ba % I k
c?
O ? ?
,:
Q rn
1 ?---- I'
?
`.
c'i w tir
? I
i
' i n n..
? f •?
"? ? C `I KNI O P, ` Ra
O

C = i

m
14
10
II co . ,
N _ ?] h
rj?
;?
%%
;
? H
'

n

r

t C)
oy m ?/' !a ? ?
i
t ? V

o
A Pl
2? N OT ~ ,?
, •1 i O

ij y O

m 4
17

-
I
,
I ? I l?l III
E ? , II

• ;i

'
I
% i ym Fyn (?

r i i I, DS Ar
o Y
/ Ii ii Ii 0o

b
' S I 0 g?$ ? N
V7
? ? ? . 'rI ? L)I
I I P? I
r Ilia
m s ? ?
'
?
, I
I
l

=HUUv I
l
I,j* i111, i'
III III
I I
I`I II I ?
? , 11 I ?
I\?

p

?

?

aq
A
i
, S
I I 1 ; 1 JI c? , ?, ? yYl

c 3 ? c o 0 0 €o
?• z• - 0 O O -o O -I; >?3" m
R. 0 N N N zxol-I ??oorf"?r? a rrr? z
(Q (G lD <D 0 0 o m r D r? r 0 co 0 0 m
O O Q_ Q' Q„ CL x Q. CoH z x H ** H?WH
D0a mHHmz N.A. zHmz
ow Hzzxo -n CO 0 r-
y -1' O 7p r n 3•? rrz0- -im C?•• O-I?
O O O p O ? Q S H -IaCD H r-ID aoDHD z
fQ Q ?Q m roc Omx< zzz o
Q_ x?Ttw zomD zz ;b000 -
N H n D Co co -4 -I ? m cn m
r r r ^ WQ co-ina Hppm II B Hco a ca
Q Q O O' Q Q? zO?D zzz?° NCOW N zzmO?I
••
c V Q
G?Hrn "a m -400 Ha D
z
CA m >00 (n
W c -c(1)"rD r. z?m 00 wo m
7r = Hm rDD o-IDH prn Do 0
O r N-0 mO?rD- V4 (YI mmCiO..
mtzi?Do z-m?=N mcco 0z1-4 00
1.4
O rn 0W
D Dcmoz z0 >
HrH ?mH(7 --1W
O zmr rzc0-)c mm mcn?011
mmm -Do-iz B II ?OIWTr
FF?w -a-uHO NN rD?
-0 C) 0 0
y moz ?mzzb Co ?m 0
,x+oo O mm D= z G) -n c m co 0 Z m 0
0 0 r- co G)
7=•
? ?.4 mCnmr- CA) CIO 0 D
® O D00 cf) m01 CDj 00
1 SDm rmz o" o-z1 M?
.4i rZm wrD-
,.? `-, . • m w
r- mmm o-0
ao m r o
?Ix-I C• z mm OC
r- CID z 0 < < Hz
D z G I0i •II II c
0
0 0 m V r
In -n 0 =
M O r -I Cao
(A O A lND• S"I 00 H N R O
N
On rt Q rt p 0 --I-I xv 0
C 3 xH m D
O C 7 a' y b 0 -1-4 -4 -I m
C 3 N ; H O -I
O
.+ A = m -0
., n Q_ O ? m 0 m
N Q 7z m <
0 -n
to r --1 0 8)
70 v
cl) w
?m m „
01 Q H z o 0
? z < O 7D
m x ?o
^on ?° c
C " DM m
O z v
I
0
O
m 'r A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
Z Z HARRELL SITE
r H KC I C REVISED PER DWG! COMMENTS APRIL 2007
m 0 STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES O NC
m c- r ^? ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS ???
Z 00i o V EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD ?tenl s. ??...?. ...? ...moo
m RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
CIO REVISIONS
9 9 so 9 9 9
so 9 9

1
I
H 1
r N
(m?
O z m
O
0 I\\

co \
? o

I
D =
s
ff4N/N/Wlll 1
ca M M53
PP
flo
-6 Mp
r 1 I ' I
M Ayp n
N?
T T N I
p_
?P r°
o ;u
?FLOW
0 1
I
? D 11
G)C 15 00 (7°0 ")?
01 ° Og
zo m ? m 0) 4[+?7
M p5 OM%,I
m G)3z
p p0
A? f ? x p ii r
0A
T N
Ati
?? I
1 I
Q
-
?1
;'
ly
Ir
I 1
I=
O 1o
I
I
i
1
1
D
r ?
0

5 ? ?

1=

I i1

al O ? ???n 11i
Ty t
\
? ,
M ;
1 i
i '
r
i
o i i
z
? 1, Iy
1'i 3p
my I
i ,
F?0
V
1
I
I
A
S?
Mm

1
?b1nl
?m
o
488
Q
o?=o

W 1
y
M WWWMMM
MID O?
r
o
r
ym T
ryyy?pp
Am r
M
nA
1 ?yy (V

1 o
m
on
i
?
M
°7?N
OR

M
I ?0$ao
?/?ISn
X
-n
'n
r -
M
M
100
0
z
11 GI
mm
mm
n0
? ?r
Q
qz mM
Gm n0
ym
i
zl 00ff
l
N?II
C
m?
1
0
Q
?D
M
/ yyy I
/ f9112
Cm
m
O
T?
AX. F.21
N
\ P?
0
M,
51
Z
G)
A OF BANK
mJ
p?A D05 9=S O
mD
Mh %IF Mw
H. 9S ymm
y !
TOyyTTy =Q_ N o
IDnb of ?O
g??O QO
N?p T 1{
N 0 y
?p0 ?z p
pLO ;
+? I jr
= m
Z H?
47 H p
0
o =
MIA
000
R61
`5Ro
mpmo
m
Ns
M M, y
m
y0
r
cl)
N
N
O
z
rr .T. m O
T 0 ZN
M
y O n
VARIES 1.5' TO 2
:r m

0o M
N
? v o
5 0 c
X
O
m
r
?
i?

G I
Q

M
i
cl)
M
°O

v
?y I

-I i
I
I
M

50

0
ch =
M
v i
n
z
D
Z
m

r
v in I
I
?$ O I

?n
m c A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
M HARRELL SITE KC B REVISED PER LAND QUALITY COMMENTS APRIL 2007
N
o
22

STREAM RESTORATION PROJE

ASSOCIATES OF NC
N CT
D ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS rI
. ?
\
?(
1 }
+
?

°
a N
EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA I
?
\
P yy?
V1YI
s?
L
4601SIX FORKS ROAD f
i sm ocsc wrax oac uonovto
Z RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 -
REVISIONS

?. z

0
-M
N Z
Z
M
- L
C=
r
O
0

z

-- X a c X
;v ;u
_
c r D -------- -------- c _ r o ca
; w
D
=Dcn co)
= -----}-------- --1 ---------
N
9 (j) In y p I 5 m
to I
---- o ?fnm -r ---- (nm
M U) m y CA
+ m n
O -------- + ml O
4---- a p? rn -------- .. can O
Z ?_ a Q Z
O 4 O
Z -- Z
Om Om
-- ME .9
w? ?+o
mz m2
O ,A
M
M
!? O
N
r?
O
mz
O
P
Q
D D
X
;o ;u
a r --?-I r
a D r
D n n r i w n n
ZXm4n;o B ---r-- Z[[D;u-HO;7
;00 N)0>0
cox9N 0) cn
-- y .omW w ?mcn
CID mn0 a + mn0
-j --
4
00 CA)
4 O? CD O?
-- Z-1 Z -I
O O
Z Z
N ----
r7 ---
O
n
y ?Qm
m gm i?
F ?o
m?
O
y ?Q mz
az
mz
O
A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
o m , HARRELL SITE KC I
Ra OF 4C
y STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ? ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS RS - • SCIENTISTS
}pyy?
N EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD LLI11 sm aSCIVIM n.IE -DAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 F`.. I'"
REVISIONS
w um v w
w
00 00 (o (D
Q1 O 00 N 0)

O , 88.41 '
i
1
1
1.
1
...:. .. ELF, /A710N 87 72.;....:.....x....
+ i VPI STA 1+OO.OD 1
p ELEVAn
N 88.88
'

4«1
a
R
ST

i
9i
..... ............. .. .... ..
... , ..
E ....
.... ....

..
....
....:.
:
...........
...
....:....:.... ELEVATION

._.
.....:.........:.....

88
..

.66..:.....'...
........ .....:...
ELEVAn0N.87

..... ......
...
.....`.........

1 STA. 11+79. is
E ATION 87.1 i
....:. ........:.... .....VPI STA. t1

Q 113ISTA. 12+02 1 1 STA 12+(19.6 '
EL(1VA TION 88 04 I ATION 8y+02
....._...... . .STA.13M2
.EU ATION 88:78
i
1
.... _ ...:....:.... ....ELEVATION'
W
? " STA-12+78.0
GPI
S1a 12+80:72
: .

w
,
. .
... LEVATION 05.8 3

E

ATION 88.61
_...
+
O
J
. 5....
.;
. d....:....l....
O ....
. _.
.. . _
d....;....<.....
.. r
.......... .... ...
r
._ .!.......

.. _:.
....1....L...
....1....;. _.;.....
.. i i
..1.... A...:....
fi
._.......i.... i.....
....i....i....i....
+
p .... . ............ .... .........:.... : i
C) a

i
:.....:....:.....
....:....:.....:....

....;. ...1.....i.... .....i.... i.... i..... .. ... .VPLSTA. 4+8266..) ...
E. ATI N 85.16
...' j __. VP1 A-44+94.07. . ..;.... ,:. _ :.... .... .....
N
+
O :
VPI
/4.15.0983
O ...
- ? E
ATION 84:01
... ...:........ ......._., _. _,.... .. .;.VPI'S ..
.....
5+25.59....1
....;....;._. ....
...:. ........l.... .....:............... .. ...Ei:£YA .98l....;....

1
......;....
........

0
01
....;. is
+
0 ..... ........:.... ........:.... . .LMNAnpN. .30...;....;..... .._..
0
:.... .. ..:.....:....:.... ....:..1..:....:..... .........:....;....
....;. ._ .EL£V TION.83.21 : ... .. ..:........5.... ....'..,..{.... i..... ....i....;..... ._.
:VPE ST 18+48.64:

ELEVATION i t Z._ _` - ; ...
V
+
p
.. '..

...
O
....i.....i....i.... .....i....!....i.... PI.STA. 17?42 ..i....i....i..... ..
L A ON 83.
.... iVWSTA +Bh.86.. :..... ....l.....:. _:.`:.... .... J.
i ..

?
....{..El'•EVAn 8239 ....... ....:.....:....:...i .....,._.;....;..... ....
,.............
. VFI.S7.A..317+ b.86.... <..... VI
.i17.
:STA
.... .....i.... i.....
..
ELEVATION a5
: .
...
. .......
... LEVAnDN ":l p
+
O
O
+
O
O
N
O
+
O
O
N
+
O
O
i
f
= i
o {
m <
m r
r
r .

r
IVPl S
A. 19+49.26
;
1
: i
TION 81.94:

:
...
....
....
.
... ...... .... t V-PI $TA. 1$i97i33 .............
.....

... i.... b.... i.... .. _.. ..;.IYPI STA. %+76.38 .........i.... i.... ....[....:....
....:....::....i .... .....:.......?EL AT10N80.88. ....:.....:....:.... ....:....:.... ....
VPI T/4 19185.39
.....
.... ....:....
....
E
_:..... Anc11. 81.83
_..:...1 :.....:....
I
........ ..... ..... .

.........'.....!.... .... .. ELEVAn Na]
FIZ....L... .....L....i....l..... ....':....__....
uPl sta. l
o+gela :
' ? ?

' . ELEVATI
..... N 80
,09
, :..
....
. :.. :.... p
S
.
V
PI
ST
A 1 37 3
pp
L
Ey
n N
Ot
. i..VPLSTA ]< B
.._i.. ....i....i..... mm?r
....l ....:.....:.... .... . ELEVATL. N. B'{..Q2.....1.... .... ?.....?i....l..... ....1....:.....': 2!
..... : :; ....' D

A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE ? KC I
? p STRE ?ssocutes K
W 0 D r
Z D AM RESTORATION PROJECT ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
F Z EDGECOMBE CO
NORTH CAROLINA "-"`^yStCn?
., 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD sru. oESawmx DATE envnovEo
STATION 10+00 TO STATION 21+54 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
riluuwnm REVISIONS

O
N 00
+F
O
O
N
+
O
O
N m O co 00
-?j 00 N

!_ .....
__......... .............
...i.
.7.

... -

....i.....:.... -
i ?

W
+
? _
81 k 23+15:08 I ....:..... . '..... ^,
_. .1.....7. ....L... .....i.... i..E4EY T1 ON 7$.38 . .. ._.. ......
LSTA 23e41. ._:....i.. ..... .
LEVATI 79.3 3
i J i 1
1
1

N

.P
... .i....
_...i....
.7......',....i.... ._..i....I_.
.....
.....7.....'_._1 .... ....i........
....:.....
.... i ...

... ....
.....
....
1....
?:
.I S,TA 23¢7 : .

.... .......

...i....
+
O : :
; . .
.
I !
.
:
t

O ... ... ...
.
.... ......... ....
....
... ...
.....
... .
. _
......
...... _
r
....
...
..
...
....

NPI ST, 241Q.77.
ELEV ON 79.16::

... ......... i .... ................. ........;.
_..?
_
ISTA -24+74.
....i.... i..
.. ....
... . ....; ........ ........:.... ..... ........ ::..... ..E VATION?79 . ....:...... ...?; ....

N
+
O i ;

O
.. _
,._..,....,.
i VPI ST ... .....
25x17:74 .... ....:.....L...
....
...
... .:.....:._..:.._
.............. ..........:ELEVA
......... j......... ON 7901 .
....:'......... ....
.... ....:.....:?...:,..... ....,....:.

N

...
._

.:.....:....:....
.i....i....1_..

.....:....:....:.....
._..i.._L...i.....

....:....:....
....i....'...:

...

VF u

STA2&lbb.04
..
...,....
Cn E A'TION TGAS
+
O :

O .... ..... ..... .
....
YPI.$T 26+;32,1 9..: :.

VPI STA. 74:79 . '.....ii ....
i .. _!. .. . ...i....
. _. .. ..S... ELEVA 78.73 - ; :._.; i. -. .. _.: _ ..... ...:.....

V
+
a
O .. .2... _',....i.... .....; _.ELEVATI ON : 98.87 ..1...
i ,
... . 7......'.....i.... .._ .... i.... 7...... ....i.... 7.. ...i.... ....;... _,....:.....
, .._L...7..

:
I
YW A'J1,7+78]87 ?_ ....._

...
. ....:... _
.

iLE
AT1 7
VC O

N
00

m

:
: :
:
O ... .
.....
........ ........
....
....
,
... . i. _. ....!.... ....... VPI STA 8+34:88 . ..j.... .... ?...:.... i....
... . .... ?._..... .......ELEVATI N7:8:44 ..... '.+
... .;. _..... i.... ....:i.... i ....:.....

.......... ..... .... L....:.

:....:.
.... .. E

.:....
A1TON 7B.d0...

....:.....:....:.....
........ L.

.... . .
.. <....
N ... .:........:.... ........:......... ......... ?...... ..........

O
...
.< ...
......
.
...
.
.
.<.
..
.
....
<
O .
... ..
.
..
.
.
.
:..... .
.
.
.
....:.......
.........
..... .........:.
c

VPI S
....
A 29+51.12
....:....:.
....:....
is EL TION 78.18
_;. ... VP11 a 29+86.76.... .......{.. ._.
W

O ... .l .... ....... ..................
....s.....
'EGEV
TiON 780T.....
-.1.. .<..
.. <.....
t
O ;

O .. .
...... VP1STA
.30

22ae ..

........

...d
£LEVATI 77.97
... . i....,;.... j.... ...VPI ST/v 30,
74:48..(.
....j....
....:; .............
...........
...
... . i....::.... i.... .... ELEVATION 77,83.:. ....!.... ....:! :... i.... i ..... .... .... i.

+ ,
O
O '

...
.:...J....1 ....
.....:....7..._i....
.. .E.
- ..: VPIiS
'9fl l.....
31..+22
.._i....i.
....i....
......... . .... ...:_ ...:..;. .....:.....:....:....
VPI STA. 31+ t.O7

...
. .. ELEVATION
. ... : y

x
W ... . .....

O .. .
VP STA 32+11:.24 fn" F
O . .
: EL NATION 77..48 '-' f
... .:..._i...VP.I TA:32+40.75
...
....! . ...:.
....:.:_
.....:....i....:.....
....i_..:.
.. _.....
Ol
:... ELE
; ATION7.76:90.,. .. : 4pl A32!+40.?6
...
......... g i

VPI
TA 32+b0.75
EL
ATION77.40 i
m
MATCHLINE • SEE SHEET b
A SUBMITTED NTH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007

~ HARRELL SITE ? KC I

A
?
o
'
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
ASSOCIATES NE C REVISED PER DWO COMMENTS APRIL 2007
r
T Q C 8 ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
Z t

(7.l EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA
4601SIX FORKS ROAD sna rcscxPm„ D.tt .w.D
STATION 21+54 TO STATION 33+98 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ?„ REVISIONS
•
of 9
9
N ? O
w 0 -A 00
N
+
O :
: I .
..
.
.! VP STA 32+1t24 i.
p ....
.. .
_.. . .
..
.
. : EL VATION 77.48
....;.._; _..:..... ._.',.... i....1..... ....l....!,....VPl 7A.:32+A0.26...
.
........
:.?.
.. .... .01470-90.1. . .. y`'I TA 32+40.75
VPI TA.32+50.75 ATION 77.40
a
...:VP:ST .32+78.75.....
j .. .... j....
..:.
;
i ' i
i
i ELEV ION 78.30 VP) A. 32+78.75
....
....
. ;....
.... ....
.....
.....
....
: ........
.:
:VPI'ST

31 76 :.....

.....E. ....

TION 76.80
W
LA .... i . : ......... ...............:..... ....:.....i.E ON78.3O:.... :.....
+
....:.....:

. : ....i.... .....:....:....l....

. E?

.... :..
EVATI

N7S:70 "''"'

......
i ii
.VPI'8Th

33+14.74
.... ....; ....i.... .... ....i.... _ ... ....:.... ... VPI. A33+21:74.. .... .. . EL ATI N76.20
.... .... ; .... .... .... ..... .... ..... .... : .... :.... EL
E
ATION75.7,0 .
.........
....i..
.
..;..,. :.
is

VPI ST 33184
i
; ELEVA ON 75.26
'
.... j.._ _...... ....
....
.
,.....
.. ,... VPf ST A
....
: 33+88.`44.
.......
........: ....
W ....;.... ;. -..L... .....>. !....;..... .. _;...? 1ELEVR ....
ON 75.02 . . ...... .. i.?...
+

p _

.
O :
....
VPI STA .
31418,
ELEVATIO N 2N.53

W ....:.....:.
....:....

....:.....: ....:....
....:....

....:.... .....:....:.....: ....
.....:....:..........

.....:....:....:..... ...............;....
....

:.........:....
....:....:.....:.... .....? ?,.

.......?.....
.....:.A. ....:.....

...:..

.:
.....:....
N
+

....!......... .._!.....! ......... ..... .... ..... ....!.. ..;.
VPI STA 36+61 40:
ELEVATION' 20. .......:. .
.
0)

p f :

..... ,

....,.....
...
E
? HEVAn

N73.OQ.....

r STA 38+44. is
L; .
is
...,.... ...._..!.....
V
.QS
..,'..._i....
... ;....:. _...... ._ '........>.._ .._;..... ....;._.
.....>....
.29...i

V
+
O ........ ....:.... ....:....:... ATION 71.0
....;.. _; .. _ ..... .....5....!....2 ..... .........
d.....l.

.
.
...:........E:.... ...

.... ...

.....:....

m
VPI A 37+89 =
T10N 71;53
:
:
:

_i_.. _

_.. ..
VPI
...
A 37+70.10

. ....

....:.........i.. ....
.. ..
....
....
i
ELEv n8N71.46
w ._.
..
......... .

o i
< i i

S ..
.._ ...
_.. .......
.
VPI. SI
-38+16:84.
..
....:......_ .......
.......
...:_..
--.i.... .. _..:__:. ElEV TION 71:3&. .. -_i.... ._.i.. ?, E.. ..i_..d

.. .....

36+$7
STA.
;
_
E LEVATION?il l , i....

LA

..L.

.. .:.... O

m
to m

O ;

< ............. ............:
It STA: x+35.
... i ...
.............
.... i.....i ....!.... .... .... i.... z.... ....i....:..... -E EVATION71 : ....: .. .......i....
VPI STA 9+50.00 I STA. 39+60.

.... i.....i
......... ELEVATI

:....:....:.....
..... N70.48

....:....:

....:. E

... EVATION

....:.....:....:.....

:...:..

.. i....!.....
-t- : VP.I STA 89.33 f
O ELEVATI N 70.39

O
;
d
s
!
.
:
p ....
.... _..... ....
....
...
..... ....
.... .
i
.... i....5 ._.!-... .... ._ .:.......... ....l....
....;.... _...;.... ....;_..,.... i ..... ....:....: EL nON70.20... ...

+
O
:.....
.
....:..
.
;
;
.
..
;
.
O . _ ..
........ .. _
....
....
....
:....:.... :.....
..... .
.
.
..
....:..... ....

....:....

.....:.....:

i
r

+

..: . ELEV ON 89.Bt.

A i $ v r?i
W A ..
+
p .........
:
.....:.... :
.....:....:.....;....
....,
...:
. VPl
A.43+Q21,4
....

....;.

...
In
O
I:STA: 43+25 .
.
.. .
...lc. .
.T10N.49,4......
....i.
...l......... T m
....;....d ....;.... ELEVATION 49 07. .._; ..VPIS .a:+_?3?t?0.... .....i. ...i_..:
.....
ELE TIQN.67 ,. ... ... i

y
m
l7
O
m
NELOD

C
m
m
m
y
A
A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE I T

o
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
E-Ma "' C REVISED PER OWO COMMENTS APRIL 2007
z ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
m Z
?tem
° m EDGECOMBE CO.
NORTH CAROLINA
, 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD sw. o[soertsw oA*E MMIOVED
STATION 33+98 TO STATION 45+96 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 wA. REVISIONS

CP 0) 0) 0)
N
.P O
O ? 00
O
W

O .............
........ ....:.........
.
..i.
.;
' :
: VPI
S a
A9t02
20
............
.
..
.....
.
....
.
.
.
O

QN.98.Q?....
.... i .... .... .... .....i.... i.... <..... IOTa 43+2500.:... .;.. E;..... Ti
.... i .............. _. 5.....'... J..... ELEVATION-69 07 ...., . VPI S A 43?S _....
:. ! .... TION 98'.97

P• .................
....i ............ .....i _..!.... d.....
.............'..... . _.:.........1....
.P.ISTA43+.92 ....
.1. ...............
.........:..... ....1.
........i....:
V ATIO N 68. Yl'
O I
i
....:.....:....:.... .....i.... i.... <..... ....:.....:....

VPI STA
;...:
....i....d....i....
....:..........:.... ....d...... _;.....
.... ....:....:..... ... J.....j ..........
....:....:.....'..... ...
... :..... .... i.
?......:....:..... .. -i. ....
....:....:.. i..:....
LA
r :
.........:....:.... ....;....;.....
.....
....:.... ..... ....
...
VPI'ATA: ....
7*84.%
VPr TA: 45+25:00. ..
ELgVAnor
e9.a4r1... ... .
....:....: ......... .... ....:.... EL VAnON 99 O4. .... ..VP.I SSA. : 2.6.N.........
.... i.. _! .... i .... .......... i......... .... i.... ..... i.... .... ;'..EI;EV
9n..
..00.
..........
..... ,....i.... .. .. ;_.. <.... i.....i.... .VPI STa 45+8 44!....! ...:....
A ELEVATION i .
01

O
r
r
VPI A46-48.30 - j
E ATIN 67.75 -
,

is

' LEVATION 87.

_.. . '... _

..

va.'i S

47+87.32
.
........
.. :.
...:....:....:....

....:....
.........
A
00 _. _
ECEV
nONB7.45 :..
O
r

sra 48+71. i

..........
anoN 97 '

p

.....;.._WST 40+3gr4z.. _. ...
.... i.... ....i.... .....i....; ELEVA ON 97:08. . ... .... <.....i....
Pm1
r

O

N
O m
t
VF
I.$TA,+M+.Ig

i....
_ .. r ATI6092
.....y....!.....?....
....i._.i.
VPI 8Ta 601:79.98
CA ! ELEVA ON BB.ZB i
r
+
O
r:
r'
VPI TA 51?+49;71
EL ATION 58.60

fJI
.... A -7
IJ r
O
p VF4 STA t50$. ..;
.... .._;..ELEVATI N+ft43. _;.... .... <..... ..?. .. ? '
....;._..' .....:.... ..... ?VP.i STAN +48.8O. ..j.... ..... ....;. r. _...
is ........ i.

is
r:

+
O
.
.
:
:
:.
:
: 2
p .
.
..... ....
... .....
...
, .... ......
.. .
........
.........,... .
: VP .
I STA 22.81 : ...:.... ....
i ELEVknO 99.20 i i i
.... i.....i ......... .....i.........:..... ....:.... ! . ....... ....r.....! ....:.
n
.._ ._:.... .. ;ELEVAnO 88,13. ...; (;....f.. .. .....' _

i 11 ?Z
?0NI0
e
? o .. a O
p r
m
Fn

O .... ..
Tm
.... ... .. UPI STA 54 2299 . i
.... ..... ...LEVATIQ 8587 i r ....

A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE KC I
?
o a STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOMTES OF NC C REVISED PER DwC COMMENTS APRIL 2007
m r
r
D
?1 Z ENCWEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
Z
m
EDGECOMBE CO
NORTH CAROLINA Ecosystem
L
m ., 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD s+v. oeuw+an oVc .wnovco
STATION 45+96 TO STATION 56+67 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 M REVISIONS

Ln Ln rn rn rn V
N O 00 N

+

....;. _.......:. _ .. . _. i ..... ....:..... ....NPLSTA,.54 .22.88.. .... i.... ...

....:.....:.....:..
..
.... :....:
....:..... ?ELEVATIO
...................
.. 65.97

..........

....:.....

...._....:.
1 :
,
1

....i...?....i..

..

.....i.... i

....:.....

....i.... i.

...

VPI. . I '
1
.51'1+94.72:....

+

r NJY 1
aNr
;:

:
: : !
:
i i i
i .
....
....
..... _ .. .......... ....
..... ....
.....
.....
.... .....
. ...
....
.... .. _
...
57
+0
0
1
,
I

' '
00 ....;....: .....:.. .. .........
; .........
;
..VP
. .I ST

.;....
S8i12112.

I
,

, .
ui i
i?;i

....:.... .......
..
.... ....:
.... <.....
.... ..... QNe4:G4.
.1 ? 63+00
1111
l
iN

....:.........:.
...
.....:....:
....:.....
....:.

?? 1 1
,
l
1
11111 ?'I ` \\ 1

1

\

........
..........
`, , 111. ?
„1111, \ 1
1 `
\
:1
1
111111,
1
......... .......
I ,
111111
4
I1
:1
'
1
1
, ; ;
,
1
=
? 1

.:....

.....:

..: .........

....:....:..........

I
I 1
j
11111
111 I 11
11
1
1
V
? A i III :
u wn i i
o
'
1

+
.
.....' ....:.....:.

...

..

.EiIkVA 57,* 03 07

.85,33....:....
1
; 1;1
i
In 11",
11 ;1
1
111 sa+bo !
`
1 11 ,
i
i ;
' VPISTA.57+4 .44:
ELEVATION 8 22
1
\
I

: '

: 1 `' ;1111

11
1
1

....:........:.
...
.....:....:
....:....
.

....:....:.....:.... ....

..
.. ....
....
1
....:.....'..
1 .
''1

;111,
1 I

I
I
. I
..... ..;. ... .. : ;.... ......., . ..VP1.57h. 13.08...;....
\
1 '
55+ i
.... '. ... .. - . _.. .E!,EVA. NB$,011
\
\ , i
' i
•
..... . ... .. .... .. .
I
1

kp9 ,?11 f i
VPI ST
9 .55

l 1
ELEV V N 54.99:
11
? 1 i
1 i uili'\ I i
I

:I 1 :
\1
I . II' 1
;
111•;1 `\
\

1
11

I:

\1 \ III II
1
1 11:11 \ \

1
1
1 I

I
I
I 1 I
....:.... :....:.
. ... ....:....: ....:..... ....:....:......:....
_ .... .
:I
.
1
1
11
11 11 '\ A
1 1
+
\ 1
1 I 1 1
O ... .... ..: :..

1 .... _....... II
Oxl
\ 1 1

` 1

'
O '
1 1
1 1 C
al
?
1 ; I
'
I l
,
ISTA:59+81
I
I
1
, I
Ilol
n

,
1
E LEVATlON 841 3
I
I
....:.....:....:. ........: ....:.... ;141;1

+ I

1
O ....:....:.....'? . ... ........: ....

1
VP
?ISTA:?

:....

*75:03":.....;

p
_ 9

1

,:

1

\

1 11
DD;

1
....:....
....:. ... ........: ....:.
. ... :......:...
.... .. .
'£I..EVATI
0411-

1

.:.....:....:. 6"

'
....:.... :....:. ... .....:....: ...
.:.....
....:....:.....:....

0 0
m

N

1
I ?'

x I
O
1 m m
I
TD !
1

I
; ! 1

;
.... ............:. ... ..... .... .... ..... .... :....
\
I
I

I
,
1f?
'? i Iinl 1 i\

.... .
...
..
.. ,m
I a,
+

_

I

1
.4

I

I
1

0
.............j.
...
....:,....;
.....?'
.S7A84+1a.

.?\i.....

..

!m

?
O
0

El
EVATION 64.3e
i
... ...........\,.._
V 1

! i

I
; m I
I l
? 0
iirlp 840
nil

,
1
i
iG

1
1 l '

'
? I ?

1
1 ; Y1
1 In i 1
1

,
: I 'I 1 1 Ili I'I \1
1
1 ; It: 11
! 1(.
? 1
1
.... .. ... .. .. .... ......, 1
......... .......
1
I
I I 4411
r
? 1
, i

O4 ....:.....:....: ... .... :....: ...:..... .........:...
.......:_.
1
+
O .' .r A0
Vhl S; ^
34

;
it

1
iii n

i
O ELEVA ON 17
1

l , 1
l

I '
I '
I
'

% 1! ,I

1
I 11 I I
'

1
1
.
?:
\ ll
1 II 11
11 I
I 11
' 1
'
I: l! I
1 I 1
I II 1 1 '
•
1 i1

I 1 1 1
I II , 1
II
I ;'

PI STa ....:.....:....

.7e

1
11

\
rn .........! .... ... ......
ELEVnna
.oo:

l
1.

l ,

I
65,? \
II
I

0
60+00
l
i
1 1111 1

1 l i I
Ili

I
i
.... ,. ... .. . . ... YP1.5TA. 42 -.
.... ,
! i ,
I I, o i
ELEvA-nO 88. :' l i
l
n
1 ?
9
I
i
I
??
l
,

1

r" • l
! ,,1A
? I
IIA
• I = I
!
'

.:....
.....:..
.:.. ?.
:.........:....
, 1 ? L
.I
1111 '
'
1

01
...
............. .:
!
' '
A

1
I l• A 1
1 ;
1

: QTi
1
I
In ill ,
II
Y
' 1
+ II 1
C) 9RY
61+00 !
i 11 C,11 /•?
.......... ... ......... ........
I:STA:;B+pl45
4.....

!

l i 1

!

?

1
I , nCi
i 1
1 I11
i ; O
?...?
I. 1; '
I IIAII 1 ; 1 2
....:.....:....:. ... .....:....: .... ?..... ....:.....:.....:..
:, 1

..1
'.
l ,
!
111' I I
I
Ill

1

A

C1
.... : :.
.
. ...
...
... i I
... i N 2 I ! 1j1 1 1
I V
.? I li
iu: d
I I
1 ! N
i
i
!
+
o
L
i ??
fnIn ;
;l
i
?°
O ...........
! . ........
! ........
Vp
I S
...
A 86+18.4$
........:...'ii....
..

;. ?Im

1

6 +O6
.!
..
.:.....:......
... :
.....:...
i ECEV
z TIdN 83.48
:
.
..
:
?
.
i
s
i
i

I
i

OD
. . .._
.... .._
_..
..
.
... ....
..
.
...
.....
1 _..
....
....
....
g

?

1

u11p I
l
"All

1
O
y I I
i; l gY
;
bo'? 111 i
,
,
9133HS 339- 3NnHOIVW

A SUBMITTED 1MTH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007

~ HARRELL SITE KC I
? C REVISED PER D= COMMENTS APRIL 2007
?
o a 22 STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT OF NC
ASSOCIATES
r ENGINEERS • PLANNERS RS - • SCIENTISTS
F
m Z
m
EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA

mystem
460151X FORKS s- ocscxPrnl WE Irvnovlo
STATION 56+87 TO STATION 68+00 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 .ol w m REVISIONS

c n U rn rn rn V Cn c1T rn rn rn V
Q1 I V 0 ) 0 0 0 f V L133HS339-3NITHO.LVW V N 0) 0
fJ
•P 00

i I
1
M

1
`
•}
O
:
:. ;
:
'

I
I j

/

I
1 ,
jl1 1
I 1

\
`
1 +
O
...
... ..
.....
VPI S T . .
A. 86+18.48 ... .. . .
.... ....
I O

l
J
i
i
r """ , ?

. 1

, IILI 1 1

\

\ 1 1
....
.....
...
....
.... i.....i.... i. _. ...............
.
.....i.... i.....`..... .... i.... i.....1 ... ..

....

I
,
1

ynn 1 1

,

l i

?
' 163+0
....:....:....:.... ....:....:......... ........:....
:
i
VPI STA
.20
i
X1111
i
ELEVAn
80.84
Mi .

1
1 i 6

? Q+ I
• 1
rn ..................... ..................... ............... .... ... v

..

:....:....
LEY
A7lON?

.
1 1 I 1
1 i i
+ 1
i +
:
: ?
:
: :
: : :
ii '
....
........
.... .....
....
....
..
....
....
....
.....
...
....
.....
..
a

I

I 1

,

, O
II
1 I .
EvnnbN 9s.

_

, ,

i :1

I
I 1?1I Y

j

1
•
.

1 I
I j?l i
1

I
1 V :q
I 1
164+0i
D 1
!
I:

I 1
I
1
....:.....:....:.... .....:....:....:..... ....:.... :..... .... .... :.....v.....:.
11 STA. W7,7.7

I
1

' ;

I
:1
....:.....:....:.... .....:....:....:..... .... :....:..... ..
E ..
AnON83 .......... i....
!
i4
I
VPIISTA.n

.....
, I

1 i
l

/
/
'O?
? I
+
O
O
...:.....:.....:....
.....:....:........
.

....:.... ,' .....

.... :1
i
.... ...... I 1 i

1 I

I
I

1

;

1

I
/

I

1
lil

?If 1 I I
ICI ," , ' 1
' 1

I

1 +
O
O

..........:.......... .....:....VPI ST 87+41 .... .._:.....,. x.,.... 1 1 /

I 65+d0
E
..'... ..
. .. ._
_,. ... i....

1

1

1 I u

.STA.M.
.
.... :.....

..
i ,
,....
. 1 E EVATQN 80. . VPI 9TA7 2.40
.... i....::.... i.... ....S... VPI $T 87+83.$2. i ._.
,
....:_..

1
1

1

i

i iii it it

1

1
i

EVATION

4
01 .._i.....i....i.... ._..i....ELEVA OM82.84. L...
I
....;....
3

1

I
,1
1
i
iii
1

!

i
i
00
!. i
! i
!

I
u
l
O :'
' :
1
I

I j
1
I

1
,I i

1
I

+

O
O .... .
...
... .....
1

1

'

1
1
1 I 1 O
.................... ..................... ............. ..... ..........3....,..... ...... ill I
?Y
' 1

I
' ?
/ 'lllljr j
1

I ,
I I
A
1 I
1
I ?

'

I
i ,
1

? 1 66 +b0

?

...

......:....
....

. I SSA 9t

.34
...... ..: '. .... t . ;. ;........
I
I
I

, VPI 37k 79:59.88 LEVA.... 3.1$

A E ATION0014
....:.....:....:.... .....:....:.... ....
:....:.
....
...
:....
....

i

t
VPI STA. 38+89.87 i CI
o ?' V lsi s4A l'i: r:o2
to ELEVATI N82.80

I
I
1 ?

I

1 ;"Till i

' p EIRATI N ? .....:.......... ..
I

1

'
'
I

1 I

'
.... 1 ...... i ,
111' 1
1
O
....1....:i .....:.... .....i. VPI STA.' 28.83 . ..i .... ....;..1..
' iini i i
1 1
....................
.....; .. EiEVATII ...... 1 .:....:....
i I 1

I
67
1
?
i ' +40

I I
11 4 1
i
i
i L
z i
i i 1: ! X
1
u
w ?
....
....
....
.... .... _..
...
. _.
. ....
.....
. ...
....
:
.........
i
1
i
I
l
i ,
j
I
I:

I
1 1

?a 1 I I
i
....:....:....:.... .....:....:....:..... .........
1
;
? •
V ....:.....:....:.... ....:....:....:..... ....:.... . .. 1....:..... .. I 1 '" I
I
tl 1 1

I ; 1
„ tl

O I '

'
Q _. .:.. ... .. "VPf K:70+M8.28
... -....
\
i
n „ i
i
;... ....; ELL) ATIONb2:31 ,. , ... :....
\ ;

1 C '
SII 66+qo
$
?
. - : VPI STA -1 ".36: I
I 9 I

I
` -. FUF/ATIO --8227:
r

\
I I
'
1
1
1
1' 11
"
',111 / /
?
O p
•Gp
rl'
'
i

t
1
l
i
!

1 l
! ,
1 ?
N
\ AjAO
....
.....
....
.... ....
....
_..

'
\
'\
'1
1 ?,• 1+0
1
`\
I
z

\

1
1 1

i
nc

L irn
? T
?
+ : VPI S 11+99.88'
O : ELEV TIdN m
.

.... ....:........
....
....:. J

l O AT
vPI STA:7z
48 .
....: ....

......
.....
........
1

..

1

1

,
•,
A 7
l
1 ?
... i... ...:...._ ..
... :.._ 1'.
\ ?• ``
1
? 1 ',

1

; .?
o
e ,
RPISTA.23+ AS .

._... _.. _..
.... ....;._. ..... .
....i. . .
. VPI STA
7".39.. j.... .
..
•
74 .4
1
i
....l ........:.... . ELEVATION 8 .25'. .......... _ ...1......,.........
V
I I
++
O O
N

I ra 7s«46 50
ELEVATION 61
..... 08
..
....
.. <..... .. O

. ..
A
V .... ... .1.57A..7 .... 1 y V!
!"
+ O O

O ( it m
1
1 g
O
q k00
'A \'. ?•
11 •?
1
,
£ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE

m -0
o STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATESOF NC
Z
r
T ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
O
m Z EDGECOMBE CO
NORTH CAROLINA tern
., 460161X FORKS ROAD J : L rcsas ox C.TL ,,,p„Eo
STATION 68+00 TO STATION 79+87 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 ,,,,Lwnm REVISIONS
I . . . . . . am ¦
m
m v m
p?y ? c u? 0 -r
7C
=
S AN i
2 0 m O v m 5
?KKpp?0?r?r?DsD??? i
A C C D U1 C C?? '
O N N z N N ?. I
co S; n Q? z D
?j c
y Z 3 ? i
i
8 O O N O O O N N N
llmmag I"!
O O
z z
m m
w D
{;? zz mNNm bi ?2
75 8 p 6 i i 9 o
3 m m
v ? P? z
y FF g
i zz ? N?c75 i m ?-? m
y g
ag z m poi I; o
M
$ 25m ccNZ 4
3 ?n °um N mi 0 vo
Z
m IY31
m m i; Ml
l
m ai ;o
mN
?m
00
e m
bA
?0
0
yzyy
2z
OQ S? Np S{m 1
B ; VN; Dm
g
RE
A
m ? A y C
ggo ?i?Z
Sc o?
= z z D
p
O ; ? I
K
8 N O?? N N ?
I? N N? O m
o
... z
m
. n
i moQy
Q -I 4?
X t?p
4 r?i D,I
(,(his n
n N
? n
z
y
n
n
V
5
mn
3
M
)
M A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE KC I
0
. STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES OF K
N r
D ? y ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS

Z +
z EDGECOMBE CO.
NORTH CAROLINA m
, 46015DC FORKS ROAD s., m,m WE .moo
STATION 10+00 TO STATION 21+64 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 REVISIONS
6 w o o 6 s• 6 so 6 6 8 so so a
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 18
Z 2 Z
m m m
n w a
0 ;a
o ?
Z s .....
0 ?
y C
O
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 17
v HARRELL SITE KC I ?ti^ A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2001
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ASSOCIATES OF NC
m Z z
::I I ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA L1.
4601 SIX FORKS ROAD 1 sn oESE?.». DATE AMCIED
STATION 21+664 TO STATION 33+98 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 M REVISIONS

m
y
A
S
A?
? m
zz

n
o Z
?
z
? ti z
mom i
;"
z r
I
0 I
m
?O
OF
2
R Zen
zrr
G7Z
mm

X7 Z A
?U
G7
• . O O o
z z z
m m m
n W D
p ?o
z I m
ap
Z m
00
y N
? O
2
Q
fU
A
N
O
m
OIL CD
O

x
C
m
m
m
N
S
a

? A SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE KCI
jT EnE r
z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ASSDOATES OF K
c Z ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS ?tnrn
z EDGECOMBE CO.
NORTH CAROLINA I L
, 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD s a WE mono
STATION 33+98 TO STATION 45+96 RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609 .,,,. M REVISIONS
w • • v a go 16 6 9
Nr '
F z '•'•'•
• zz z
M m m
A W D '
M M v ? '01
O
O O O N
m
a ILI 'k9T0y4NF,S?FSyB ? ? ? •
v O lg .
om
am I
N
20
o O
N
A
D O
r
m
O
A SUBMITTED WTH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
v HARRELL SITE KC I
y STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT - ME ASSOCIATES OF NC }?
m Z E ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS ?4?Y1 f
111
Q+ z EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA 4601 SIX FORKS ROAD??? s+. rcumv,a o.ic •vrnnvco
STATION 45+96 TO STATION 56+87 RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27609 k„ :??M REVISIONS

N 0 0
. z z z
m m m
() 07 D
y A v
A G) O
Z IA
8g0
o m
A
?o
O
z N
y
Nays'".
OZ 133HS 33S' 3NnHO1dW
m
HARRELL SITE
z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT
z
z EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA
0
STATION 56+87 TO STATION 68+00
v 1-4
AW %-A
ASSOCIATES Of NC
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
4601 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
r-m"*j-
Fkosrtem

O
? N
O
?
O
2
n
N
A A
-04;p I
O
SUBMITTED WITH RESTORATION PLAN I MAR 2007
SY1l OESCPoFitlN D.TE -CAD
REVISIONS
8t133HS333.3NIlHOIVW
2 2 Z
m m m ,
0 11 11 0 07 D
m p T S
zS z ....... .
O O OO„ N
Z D m
_'
°w O
ti
A
co
O
41 A SUBMITTED MATH RESTORATION PLAN MAR 2007
HARRELL SITE
KC I
z STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT ? ASSOCATES OF He '
Z z ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
z EDGECOMBE CO., NORTH CAROLINA 460151X FORKS ROAD tee o.,Eoo
STATION 68+00 TO STATION 79+87 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 M REVISIONS
• •• • • • • •
CONTRACT D05025
1 KCI JOB# :12054239
-
O O
? w N a w N ? r? r ;{ ? A`?aa •:,o o
LL ev

F7n
?A
N ° e
Z Z pb c ° r.?.w.,

o
y n ?.
11, An
y x ?
c , ? ,.?a .w?

r? ?
' v lid 4a ?'
l1
o ?x K
I
y
a?° `J ? fi2k+
<a ?"E
4
o ? ?gl °a??
tl? 1y a+hn. MC y a!A :aINYI AV".*Y+3

n z (? .c ?IMkhiz Ch?po1 Rd
M
II b
y v
m
n =?
m w
II A p o
7o O
N v H
w A
m
P
n
v1 m p y

It

S
1

b x
a
?

?A ? O M
o $
TFOO
•,••, ?
, (AJ
`°
to T 99 m???
2 z9

v?'i
D c

?^ gam

Op
,
i,

O

4
pm m ................
. t

..

b i

H

?
v
s2a
GIUD ON o

m

------------ -- -
----------------- ---- - ?CONSfRVAh?N?SENT
mmzj
r
s1 y?.
,•t•
\
y
`• i
')`.•
F`
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------
----------------
k-- - __ -
--------------- --
i?? ? _ ? -_-- ?----- __ ?•,0??` x•41,.
i
I

O

V• O
y O
2
N ???
nD
O
?
F
T
N
O

I
'
i
i
i
I
i
i
J
O
1 ?
i '
\ ' 1
t
!
i
It
!
i
i
t
1 ?\
i
ri
I
. 1 J'aC
i
i
J
I•
j?•
i
i
I
I
m mml i . i
X X X
W N N N
_ z z z z z
_ Z Z Z Z Z
-_ 0 0 0 0 0
? o t? ?Nl
- O ? 8 p
N O F C
Z m m
y N
\

`
' I

Ymy
Woo
3!xm
\_--- mt'm
Rmii to
c
ZXM

OM
mv? m c

8 ? ? O O
?
<NA A
0
N m

m HARRELL - UT TO SWIFT CREEK
WETLAND KC I
RESTORATION PROJECT T
N0L00fE
ECH
9
Z m ROCKY MOUNT
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS.RLANNERS•ECOLOGISTS
,
, SUITE 220 LANDMARK CENTER II sw. o[savigx olit ,wvaovto
4601 SIX FORKS RD., RALEIGH, NC ,:....
-
REVISIONS
r-ol Ilk
mz?c ? ??
6 ?
+A
- } --------------------
----------
I" --
----------------------
------

/ F?
$z
Q
o
?
yy
yyyy0
?

i y
NO

i
i Nom

?. i
\
i
y,! 'I

T

I ?.
' 1
1
1
i ?h^L '1 1

i_ I••

• • •• • • 6 9 • • • •
1 /

?• C?NSF
•
i .
i
1
i
i
i
i
i
j
1
. . . . . . . •

• • . • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • . . •

. . . • . • . . • • . • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • RVgnO?y
??

• . • •

• • • • • • • • • • • •

. • •

. • • • • • • • • •

• . • • . . . • • • . • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • i
1
1
1
I
I
I
1

1
1
?• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1

•?, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I

?•
?. • • • • • I
j

••'e
yap
14
.

%

. % . . . .

.'

r
•'

. . . . . . . . . . ,.'

. . . . . . . . . ,.•
. .

O ! 0
;1 i z
A
O
D
`v O !
d I
! ? r
RI
m
n

N
? INIp
/
1
1

N z
?
ED
I ol
0 1 g
i
_ I ? N
N

O ..................... ... i
.................
HARRELL
UT TO SWIFT CREEK
-
WETLAND
KI
?
a RESTORATION PROJECT TECHN J
0 ROCKY MOUNT
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA E
LA
R
E"
,
, SUIT
220
NDM
K CENTER 11
4
2R
N
X
R
LE
sw
cesavlax
DATE
•wnovco

J Z 601 SI
IGH
FFO
KS R0,
A
C
M, REVISIONS

1 t? i
1121
i
1122111 '
1172ttttl
1 l 2 l t 2 1 1 7 2 1 1 • ?oNSFkvgnaN
1 1 1 l 1 1 l 7 1 1 1 7 2 7 "?:EMEMT
1221712t11121t2t2 221
i 2111117112112211221 27222122212
1221221t72172122t121 22211222221122122
i- 1222tI127711221121221 2111721t2111t22221721122
i
2121222111722712171122 1t2222221222121t1127121t121122
i
1211222171722171171177271 tt2121112217711I22172112217221 177
1221172122777t777t7ttt2721t t?111222122721172272tt221t22tt7t27 22
127122211 122222217727111221112221221122212121112217211121171112 22
•
12271111111 71771177171t221t212221221t21122222112t17112727122 172
i
112t2lltlll tt212Itt72tl127I2111172111221721t2t1t11122t 21211
212121212112 t271111212211211121t2211t1t221t22772t72 211221
21121711121122 tttt71171711t7717771172t2tIt1t171 7111111
211t17tlt2tt7t1 tt22tt27ltttt22721t12tt7172t 212171121
i
17tIt712ltIt17221 7211121122
171127t2t171122172 177111721121.
1722t1122tItt172122 22t7211711t11
•21211211211211211222 7212722112112
i
?1721t1111117222112t 712211711721117
°I71tI1t21721122t111 271111171211171
i
•.?71171722t22122172 121122t11712t2777
•`•.? 7tt22712221171 211221112121211
?'••.,? ?2112271711 7171 2711712721
`••? 17222111 t1721111t2221
`•e, 172212 122111171222
?•'`•.? t? 72221171171
e,? 12211 17127
`• 1271771? %?
.? s
a 2177111 %•
'••?• 2 1 2 7 7 1
?'•e, 1 1 7 7 1
••. t l 7
s
s
r
.'
.?
........................
I %I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
? 1 2 2 1 2 N N N
?' O O O
12212m m m
cF?n? m? 3i a m?Fo m? ?z ggma?YS 75?
yv0 >O m = !'C z-o z > 01 12
1 9 g n L•' Z
mW?n 7C m nm min x y 7C Dm m fn x Dm
V O ?3 O m m A 9 ft01 O m v O Y/i+ .ova m m pp
O C53 O u
ss?j 10 $ ?c m 8 DD 10 9
zim 0> >0
I ODt?ny?AO yp?y fn 3 c:ca rn fn 3?TUy a?^ rn
O? g9 AAA-AA F N y A A? Rm. n y A Z OC> n z W
O 3 -.02.-.0 n z ZZZ?? o o o x 9 z z z> c E a z z
C (?, D C C C C C O C C D C y D
fA 4! N M 3 A; N f/1 41 Wo P fp
0 A
? ; (J 3
p cmac;-i> z ?z0cm z cz???? z
z
'a c: -, " 11 22
0
m Az m m Az F m
2 czi E
m c m m
N ? N N 5 :R m N ? N
N0 sp y z v z 1 0 5 z o
m m 9 m T m ri
(? NN NN NN n J N
B O O N O N m 8 0 0 0 N N N O m g O N N N N iJ N
Ilf???"' 46 0 N
O O
4! 41 N
HARRELL - UT TO SWIFT CREEK
~ WETLAND
& KCI
z RESTORATION PROJECT TCCHNOLOOIPS
o ENGINEERS- PL ANNERS• ECOLOGISTS
z ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SUITE 220 LANDMARK CENTER II ` + I I sw ocsu.+ax WE .vrsorco
., 4601 SIX FORKS RD.. RALEIGH, NC
1 11
1 REVISIONS
9 9 9 9 so so

I r
c`S

z

'

<

A
' i o

(-NCI

D
I
m In x II

mm?n

A I
M'D
G I
I L
H 2 ? I

LA m

y
m
r Las
D
0 y
m
H n " 1
s? C O ?'.p" i .
, .0
1 <
a z m Z i N
H
H
i O D 1 QJ o 0 ?
?N y ao x

I 1
O
,n
M
i
C
N I I
?
H
f
Z
rn
I i D
tAm
?4 <D 0
m O
m
0
iX b
m
7
A I

-4
??-I iy
1 HZ m
' x
1 O D
z
i a)
io
N O ?0
g
z
y io m
• In
x m
r
I m
i

O
! 0
x
2
MA W N."=
G) rCOZ?In
W mg?bOrn'?z ?m
D {OZ,oimCo
N zE c
N OmA°cc A25; 25 IM my m 0
_0' ca O
O a-mo m>wRm mo> m
n
co3
M
mg . zz '- T?Zm
z
m o m'a o n
m LLi? Pm
? C GOyOpz 00
cm m5s?on x o0
sa
1-4 0
0 -Mpg,-02
z 40RUF o
M ?
Z x W m
--I H.
4 ?
z o?t/? o
o 4
D y 0 z o
m or? mI% m a <
U199 ?
0 m?oFz m
m ?
g?sMR o
ouxMi?cMm m
0 1 O
I\\
rn; r m ?o
z < < o
0) x
ca
A
>
C ? O
Z
j
< i7
m
z p
II O
A > 2
O N
C? 2

IM
A
o \ m
0
"\
3
O
M
D /
r ?.

rn
x
repo /\
/ >
I y
m
rn
?I
rn
K O
.-.
~ Z

r'0A
/ N
g
0
-400
Q
O
O Z
+1

0

d 0
x 0
I
i
1
i
i lci
I
I ;
I
I
I
I
I
2
cc
I
m
w
IQ

HARRELL
UT TO SWIFT CREEK A REVISIONS PER DLR COMMENTS OCT 2008
-
WETLAND
KC
I
RESTORATION PROJECT T LCNxowo?e s
ROCKY MOUNT
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-ECOLOGISTS
I ti I
I "I Cl
,
, SUITE 220 LANDMARK CENTER 11 "
S sru. oLStmrigx wr[ -Ono
., 4601 SIX FORKS RD.. RALEIGH, NC
REVISIONS
.
1 948 1954 .

ti

N

AS ; ' „
' f
^'
k VIA 1
+
" 7
•'
kt ,,? -?P
cF s
•?
:!. f \, j?•T ,.. f ;•q f '-?
V
'
!b

r
?
r
l
A

^ ? 3
1964
;r _, 1971 - ?L'
t

t

•
°i?1?? d
?. •' ? ?? .''?'? •7 ?? _ ?-
5 fit' _ ? -r'
?
-¢
? «
?" ,?
??• P
"
. =tai'
"'?
y ?a _
c •ti?:?,. ,?.Y
-
w A
E
t?
„
N? ? t
ma
t

Harrell Historic Aerials 1948 to 1971 `
KC1
Project Site Boundaries s I
1:18,000
5
K C I 1 inch equals 1.500 feet ;

) 1 `
I ' \. (
TI(
??-
NTA FCNN t CIFc
.

1979
F
v
?,'"

Harrell Historic Aerials 1979 to 2005
•

w? E KCI •

s ASS00AT[S 01 \t
•
Project Site Boundaries

K C 1 1:18,000

1 inch equals 1,500 feet
•

TECHNOLOGIES 1,500 750 0 1,500
FCCt
NVIRONM TECHNOLOGIES
I
C I
C
CO
C
O
•
Source ? USDA !Vanu-al Resource Con.cervatiun Sen?ice N
A
AND
N
.
NSTRU
TI
N.
•
•

a

r
Appendix B. Correspondence
a
MMWWA?
- mmmmm&?
?o
KCI --
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS SCIENTISTS • CONSTRC`CTION MANAGERS
TECHNOLOGIES LaSCmruti (?.?F; it 5i iGr„i? ;btu( 1i? F- :. R.an R-?Fi?fr • \d s7 otv ?;_.1-51 i ( >
July 5, 2005
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator - SHPO
4617 Mail Service Center
- Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Attn: Juliana Hoekstra
Subject: Cultural Resources Review
Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 12054239
Dear Ms. Hoekstra:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed I Iarrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project,
which is located off of Morning Star Road approximately six miles northeast of Rocky Mount in
Edgecornbe County, as a submittal for cultural resources review by the State I listoric Preservation Office.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The current land
use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Crop Fields Forest with small patches of
Coastal Plain Oak Bottomland Forest according to the 2003 NC GAP land cover dataset. The restoration
would improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, reforestation of riparian buffers,
and restoration of wetland hydrology. An old spoil berm will also be removed, which is currently a barrier
to flooding. No impacts to structures on the subject property are anticipated.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts to cultural resources associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], eat. 141, should you have any questions or require any
- further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely.
a
Michael B. SchleaeI
Project Manager
KCI TEC:HNOI.0(1IES «??".k; i.cum
OW lfich
ael F.I`acley, Governor
I,isbeth C. Evans, Secretary
Jeffrey J. (.rote', Deputy Secretary
July 18, 2005

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Office of Archive and History
Division of Historical Resources .
David Amok, Director
Michael B. Schlegel
KCI Technologies
Landmark Center II, Suite 220 .
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration, # 12054239, Edgecombe County, ER 05-1536
Dear Mr. Schlegel:
Thank you for your letter of July 5, 2005, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the proposed undertaking and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the undertaking as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
eter Sandbeck
a
Location Mailing Addma Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount Street, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Semice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/733-8653
RESTORATION 515 N. Blount Strw, Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC: 276"4617 [phone]/715-4841
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount Stmt, Raleigh, NC 4617 Malt Smice Canter, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone]/715-4801
K C I ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • SCIEN I IS I S • CONSTRUC-110N MANAGERS
-- - -- ---- ---------------- - -
ILCHNOLOGIES ??FZ 11 • S' I1C 220 • +6113 Six 1, -RK, R,, ;c • k :; • ,( • 1)34 78; 0111 • I-a\ ?sI') -. ,
a July 5, 2005
Linda Pearsall, Program Head
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
1601 Mail Service Center
. Raleigh, NC 27529
Subject: Natural Heritage Review
Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 12054239
a Dear Ms. Pearsall:
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project,
which is located off of Morning Star Road approximately six miles northeast of Rocky Mount in
Edgecombe County, as a submittal for natural communities and rare species review by the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The current land
use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Crop Fields with small patches of Coastal
Plain Oak Bottomland Forest according to the 2003 NC GAP land cover dataset. The restoration would
improve water quality and provide greater protection for aquatic ecosystems from surrounding
agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing streams to create more natural and
stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features, reforestation of riparian buffers,
and restoration of wetland hydrology. An old spoil berm will also be removed, which is currently a barrier
to flooding. No impacts to structures on the subject property are anticipated.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination regarding any
potential impacts to rare species or natural areas associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone], ext. 141, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
Michael B. Schlegel
Project Manager
hC:l TECHNOLOGIES ww .kc1.com
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
July 11, 2005
Mr. Michael B. Schlegel
KCI Technologies
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project; Morning Star Road, Rocky Mount,
Edgecombe County
Project No. 12054239
Dear Mr. Schlegel:
The Natural Heritage Program has no record of rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas at the site nor within a mile of the project area. Although our maps do not
show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean
that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of
Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if
the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or
priority natural areas.
You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at <www.ncnhn.orl?> for
a listing of rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the
topographic quad map. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-715-8697 if you have
questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
Harry E. LeGrand, Jr., Zoologist
Natural Heritage Program
HELlhel
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276WI601 t -One
Carolina
Phone: [phone] - FAX: [phone] - Internet uwww.enr.state.nc.us Naturally
An Equal Opportunity • Affirmative Action Employer • 50 % Reayded ' 10 % Past Consumer Paper •

MENnomw4komn
.NNNW4?
mmmmb ?
wmmmmdh?
KCI

NGINEERS • SURVEYORS
----

SCIEN I IS I S •
-- -
- ---

ONSTRUCTION
-

ANAGERS

ITECHN01,0GIE.S
(-,t'.t>???k C ?r?? Ii • st:i_ 2_0 • 601
IOPK, - R ?i;.•i • ?C --
-:•?,.> • qP) ;ti;_y'ti • - -
Fv,, ?):?T r
July 18, 2005
Mr. Gary Jordan
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636
- Subject: Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Project Number 12054239
Dear Mr. Jordan
Please accept this information pertaining to the proposed Harrell Stream and Wetland Restoration Project,
which is located off of Morning Star Road approximately six miles northeast of Rocky Mount in
Edgecombe County, as a submittal for review of the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, and Migratory Bird'Freaty Act by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
A portion of this property (refer to attached layout) is currently under investigation as a stream and
wetland restoration project for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. The current land
use in the project area includes predominantly Agricultural Crop Fields with small patches of Coastal
Plain Bottomland Forest. The restoration would improve water quality and provide greater protection for
aquatic ecosystems from surrounding agricultural lands. This type of work typically involves enhancing
S streams to create more natural and stable channels through minor grading, use of in-stream rock features,
reforestation of riparian buffers and bottomland forest, and restoration of wetland hydrology. An old spoil
berm will also be removed, which is currently a barrier to flooding. As part of the environmental
documentation process (Categorical Exclusion), coordination with the USFWS is requested for
compliance with the Endangered Species Act, Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and Migratory
Bird Treaty Act.
Following the review of the included documentation, please provide a determination of the potential
effects to endangered species, w=ildlife, or migratory birds associated with this project.
Please feel free to contact me at (919) 7$3-9214, ext. 141, should you have any questions or require any
further information to process this request. Thank you in advance for your assistance and attention.
Sincerely,
Michael B. Schlegel
Project Manager
KCI TECViNOLOGIES ?t n u.kci.COm
- -- -- --- --------------------

1-1
O? WArq Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?0? QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Colleen N. Sullins, Deputy Director
> U M3
Division of Water Quality
fl
ug?al
September 13, 2005
TPBRRO#05-244
County: Edgecombe
a

a
0
L-1
i
KCI Assoc. of NC
Landmark Center Il
Suite 200
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attn: Mr. Steven Stakes
BASIN:
Neuse River 'far-Pamlico X
(15A NCAC 2B .0233) (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
Complaint NOV Buffer Determination X
Incident # Appeal Call
Project Name: Harrell Stream & Wetland Restoration Site (KCI Project # 12054239)
Location/Directions: located off of Morning Star Rd approx. six miles NE of Rocky Mount
Subject Stream: UT to Swift Creek
Date of Determination: 7/27/05
Feature Start Buffer
GPS Points (if
provided) End Buffer Stream
Form Appeal
Call Located
on Soil
Survey Located on
USGS
Too hic
1 Subject X X
2 Not Subject X
3 Not Subject X

Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
VLwT'
AV
_
?!(:UEi':: phone [phone] Customer Service
facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748
rtca??C,, 3tIr.4p11I C4 VVCua#JU nGawrauvi? QILC ?FN" t rI VJMt * Ievu-4eovj
9/13/2005
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire f ve (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties
that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a surface water exists and that
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c% Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Wetlands140I Unit, 2321 Crabtree
Blvd, Raleigh, NC27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an ad judicatory hearing. You mast
act within 60 days of the date thatyou receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory
appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of
this decision. DWQ recommends that the applicant conduct this nodfication in order to be certain that third
party appeals are made in a timely manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, N .C, 27699-6714. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing
within 60 days.
a
a
yhe (owner/future owners) should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). Tiris project may require a Section 4041401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be .
directed to the Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-733-1786, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Off ice) at (919)-876-8441.
Respectfully,
Michael Horan
Environmental Spec. I
a
CC: Jean Maneule, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Office
Debbie Edwards-Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Crabtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27604
File Copy
Central Files

..,r,...?_.. ? ° L._... ?_-T. S94 _ ay?,m'^-- r??,?. - ~1\-• = .? ..?. Cem .aj syg s
75
4r ..sue t q 7 ',?O w`\ V _. _ A ._ '• ?-l "?1. i'x' ? Y{ V,
?'sue - _ 1 ..?^ '? .: ..---^-• yxg
Ito
'113
, i t ? _ . _ -+,?_ " '•_`•? .. _- - ?.` ,4' .
?\? -. ???' ,,,yam-- r" ?• t` ? q - - y _ r • ti? M ?
4--
/ t./'....--, l`??. •`"^;,"?.•,.Jl/•?q ??. :_ '- .? ?. '` . a ? it `l';` ~ -
Price,
?. ?" "...- O.? (, V .._ I?r-, - - Mf aeasm'saa ?,rz ? yr><aa
', `x.644 "".. i?°`' ? S: ?-'.•_ -J ,¢ ? ? `? \/?aaa?tr:s: a
p 1 t?, ?o {q
I? -. ? ..""?,,,? - y `sir ?!SS Srse.ai;s.y'p?} {+?? .:.`? _ ...,.• - _ ,•.•'« _•, \ ??'/ 1
,y?l .\e i6'9- •) i OQ'a ..,,,,•?1,? """ -• •r.. .kr ? /?I?•?•,j • Y. .
f? ?? r?YY 1 . R?Eri ?? t J ?3 ?i `•"^?• ' -r ._. ? •ro- -, • \ i :f? 8q 9
1 f "?? ~t \\ % ''a°'?a ?,? • : +4 1 ^ S j."• ,? ?? i x a ndpft _ - - - _'" ?v- f a i. ? r?t?( +at?ra jrx
{ Jf aaa<? ` /lt sAa t!t s r ?t ? r r?. w .e- ,..,,, - i . .y, .•r. ?/? \ \ •
?•'?\ l y f,??`` --••, 'd y, / ` J °• 1 ` ?,?,s,r.s; ?I I ?? ,y ?•?,?.,?.-•...?*., •y ... _- ",` ? .?O t' \? ?? 4
?'FR??1/1?'" R°` i +?,?. ? r t to sa } -.C•- ? r r:! ?
jj/
o?.,.e!- i a a
?' - ?1 ._r••-•i oo-'? \ ;`'fie ,_? *,,; ?.,, f'J
!??'-?`.J j ?..,,,•„?`•...-i y t' ? ,o.s 1 ( ? r / ....t'...??'tir ?_' ? (()Jl r ? / 1r
art :. •.4 ? ? •--W-' ( ?rr+ //?•,•V„?...- w[/fyl
\ \ •...? a ? 19.
t„Y=.;'J?• /? e-???Y'. _.Y„ ?-.1f\ / y • ?_^-,y
84
?` ( - -
Air
H `? X•: ? e U- ; tea` ' yti ?` t
=r'; •-?^ rTAReoR0 1:82 5a)) WRENDALE 2 Ml. 40'
SCALE 1:24000
i 3 0 1 MILE
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 M 6000 7000 FEET
. 1 5 0 t KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET MCI
?
. DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL t
QUADRANGLE LOCATIO:
THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS
FOR SALE BY U. S. GEOLOGICAL. SURVEY
DENVER, COLORADO 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA 22092
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS tS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST
EDGECOMI3E COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA -- SHEET NUMBER, 6'
Ra Ra 0gA -,J
' f GSA Var. 1 ila8 .' DgA
.3 $t9 ,-?Ve ?p `? Tai t y
A.
Ra
Goa Pic$ 63 b 4 if Tab
-- ^ '- ?
GoA
Nob AaA ABA AaA
RO Mo
1 t Ra Wa8 was
?o NoA ? A ` DFA•
it $
r:
Was w GoA POS Was COB to
Aug NOS CsB 5 r+_?
Was Ro ' CC
Re $ BB RO
GoA1oA v`?a8 NoA Pies ; We Sib ti zs Cc
Re Ai Was / AsA \
o? Ha8 oe l ^: \
r /• NoA tics LY
`?y8 DgA }';: ras
t GOA NO R. I Re ,YC GoA ©i y1a ?u Ste °rt
NcA
GoA Nos GoA
l
P!Z$ We x ` ra Wks,1,
$ts
NoA AuB s
9 t Aa=
rata MoA N09 v , £ tlp Ste a <
G ^ rf?
Wa8 VVaC ?. ?z• Ces •-. ? '.
:b Na NoC o? ,
s .;Au6 _ Nob Was Mae Nob as AaA r. Me
v .? Wa6 # y k
is
G -s- a, BA
9 MaA Ra D { .
lY " ?? GOA
Nos
?: I. h *. .? NoA RB J? Aa+4t 1 Me
GoA 4 t 006 Ro s i r A"+
63 Wa8 ?Q paP AaA +R TO
p
h S? P COB. .
r
OPA Pu
d? ` WBB NoA ABA
W e6 a
ens NOS
GoA A W' A{y $
GoA a$,
jty Ra
NoA Ro
Re `.Wa8 coq- ?A?stY" ;, >?A
Wa6
Au@Ma6
@QILj.''>tF.t r? •t_ GOA YYaB
Vlae .r n.
St6 CEB j-
`YVa6 , Sts
GoA. `« ~? F AaA? AaA
tyB NOB ' Ma
r r LY•. n -ipgA4 Ro
.y NOS twei Ste
t?
7i? Ra D9A
Ro GoA PtoAa'..,' 08p
s .
Ru we
St8 '' r, s.a D Y `}Vl Ste rr AaA
AEA .. : j gA • • ; rte..,- . ? .' ?:
AaA
y;s Ro : ,? St8 Ot;A RO We
AaA r We r 09A
D8A x
'?•, Dps w w All
Ro StB We a, 5
o 4w tao . We i(
Wh Ro c{i??TSa .
T 7 aA Ste e$ Ca R DgA.
i # 5f!. 0 =M*
5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 5000 Feet.
)Scale,1:20000
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Appendix C. Conservation Easement
--a•4de -„ a 8
b gill e $ ?8n?6= qg b 3 a :9 b F Q Zoe '
F _ ?y= p jig 6 t'3?l O m F 2j' W
! , a bi? Qza b` ; ya pp..-a 9 Q o- w K ?9
° ? ? 3 g3Y ? 3 g a E A R R -ZA m'
Q.. r g ?`$ pp qp ?+ a y g till?p[ i W --- N °j
_ e V R Y E '? 8 B G 4 3?tb !? w La
(A w C: zoW r?'
_ 3 b Rik g
w z, N$ a ogHxHa ?b . I3 6 a
I /J
zz 11
N VI
Nb O,
! Q x
t M1?Y E-1 O NZY
DI y > V
ally W w b v
z V)
I???M?i qll? •` .°• Y?i W a
1-4
R N?
RY
.? y a2G
?P 'f0
F'p
H la
3 % e eeeaeaeeRRRe ?? ??? A? ?„ .3?
Y ¢?? $? p?pLL?E?ppC?LE $? ? 1 Y.3d?
3 A-R^ni 1; SR8.R a R'
kRkkk ?k' y? $ sR _
a?aa?aaa €p b ,F r
•? €y r s A
C F(?
F R R b Y Y b o by Er : , ......:?:
HIM "I
R-Qg$SY? YG y9 /?14Y
g ppgg gg C 7 /
p ygg?gg
R spa gab-1, bgs .,6?,?
low
ggt•RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR?RRRRRRS? bWA `ReeRg b?. eeeR jp b$" ORRR
$C pCjpp?p@?pLp?pRpt??@p?pp 3 E 19 @pe? H5 ! Irag p?@p Hga ? ? gige 1yy3g J a; D( >.? >:.:: R
+q? pp ' g RSR 9„R=9899,r _88,t^ qq 9 Q° ?? pgb 5 ?? ? 'g_? 36
b8 y? ? ? ??g?IA'o :?p??S'b b 8 E gBRB 36 gb A ; a a m
e ppC C pp C p gp CC yg p ppg C C 8 gC p i . .....:.......
'?yt Yt b? LY -? SY 3 b@ `a•:>?> > ...... `. :: 1p
itlj ?. as333 33y,?1y1, Yt, 111t YY i ?Y 3 f 31I1'S r @Y '?ka}' ?
1?PP.' PiZ L? R?? fe? R `j? yiL'n R
HIM ? `S?? • ?' ? ? ?:i:::::i::::::' ?•8 b' ? Y'b.1 ?
`R E ! ? F
` 3kg @ g aaaH21E 11 W11 Mlililb a ??$?2232
C-7
•
•
•
•
•
•
Appendix D. Project Site Photographs
•
STREAM SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
i
?g I

Beginning of the project stream as it leaves
the culvert and enters the Harrell Property.

A view downstream from the first road
crossing; gauge 1 is seen on the left.

} w

e
r r. -? t t

Eroding banks along the project stream.

3 ?? Y

LM
p

Looking upstream toward the first road
crossing on the project stream.

Looking downstream with agricultural fields
bordering both sides of the stream.

Looking upstream from the second road
crossing.
STREAM SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
N'r
M
N
A view downstream from the second road
crossing with gauge 2 on the left.
yq tt y
A look upstream along the lower portion of
the project stream.
vw 401'
w d"
051
Exposed banks along the project stream.

`-

Another view upstream along the lower
portion of the project stream.
y r 14-
a ? t R

The downstream limit of the project stream
where it enters a forested section before
draining into Swift Creek.
Looking upstream from the end of the project
stream.
WETLAND SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
.41
?,w?. +alflt„ , K ,
An overview of the wetland site looking
toward the southeast.
.e. _ . , Wis. .. -:..:..??a-1• .. -, .
I
The entire wetland site is under agricultural
production.

4

i
V
.

r,

y 41.
?
r
Looking upstream of the ditch that drains the
southern portion of the wetland site.

A look at the wetland site (to the left) from
the upper northern boundary.

A look at the confluence of three ditches that
currently drain the wetland site.

+ i ?. _ P .r 5 x
"F r
F? ?`c8?• ice. ? ?
Looking north-northeast over the site from the
main ditch.
C_� ll
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•.

Appendix E. Existing Conditions Data
•

a
l °
l
C

0 1
3 ai
1
Y -p 1 1
C O 1 1
co LL
1
1
1 1

1 1
1

1
1

1
O
CO
1 !
1 1
1 1
0 1 1
0
1 1

O
Z v 1
1
y
1
?
i 1
1 1
1

1
1 1

1

?
_
?
a 1 1 0
F 1 1 ro I

d 1

1 1

1 C/)
L
r
Vl
1
1
O
O
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1

i 1 1
1 1 O

1
t
1
1 N
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
O

?
a
y 1
1 1
1
i
^a I 1 1
C. ? 1 1
ti ? 1
I 0
O 00

O
0) CC) (O
OD 00 N
00
T
u o
(;oej) uol;enal3

o
N
G

C O
?
h ,a? m00 M CO V Ow ?m r-- C) M wr, LO
W O O CO W 00 7 (O It N It r` Lo W O 7
10 r- r` (D CO CO LO M M M LO CO r` (O r- r`
y aD O co co 00 co 00 co 00 00 00 00 O O 00

N C
CO
` m A L U
..
lC
"' y
V1 L 16 un O M m N W to to
7

O lL O O O 4 cc r` m o W N 4 to Lo 0
O N c0 M m co
m V V' V' U) CO r,
? t` `r x r N - ? M .--. O
O N
Cd
L
Q
G
C

4 O
u u
'i'•
s 47
Y Y
e

`? C
C y
V1
a
'a C
CC ?
Q?
(? O
•CC

A
? L
<
3
m
?
a
h
, o ?
? CE C ' ?

?
?
-
7 L
G. L
6.
d
A
Ri .
? y
ti
` bA
'
'
?.. w w ? .o A a
A ? ? cC
u
?
s e
m c
m e
m c
? c
? x
? e
? ?
? t
a a
?
o
3 a
W j e r oO 01 M 2
W M' ? 0 ?
I
W y
J
W co
W

'
_ - - - -
- - - -
- - _._ - - f
W

W LL's
J J
W '

N
W
J

- - - - - -
- - - - -
- - - W m
. cD
N N ?
V V r
O N
Q? M
N O
N r
O m
(D r
r
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .( W ?
J M
M M
W M
W M
N M
W N
N M
N M
N M
eD N
N N
c0
W
m

m LL
K
O m
W

d N

U i
U
m
LLfl?

i

g ? ?
m o
W wm
LL ?
-

E
C
__ _ -...
. __. o 3
LL J
LL H
OiO OOO OOO OOO OOO O, OO OOO OOO OOO OHIO CIO OiO O O OHIO OHIO CIO OO
d7 m I
O

W O O W of

iO

N (O

m CO

O
V
O
N
N
O
,
0
0
N
M
N
(O
r
Q?
O
N
15

O C of O? ? ? (O ? ? M ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 O '.O O O O O O 'O O O O O O O O O O O w -
O O O p . O O O
i a
0
O N
?
(g) UOIIBA013 0
O
>
a)
C: -0
number of particles .o
N o0 =3
0 0 0 0 ns
M CD V N O C> O
U
c
0
U
Q)
.a
Q)
d
U
H
N
2
C
7
O
U
a
a)
a)
d
U
U)
H
S
C
7
O
U
a?
a
a)
m
m

r
x
a:
C:
Z
I _
i
- - -
-
i -
i
I
o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O W 1? (D «7 V M N
o n m a?

o
m
CO

a?
_0
a
E
O
-o
O N O O
Xt U) a' 3
a?
W V C
?E ° C
as
c,
o
° M
a CD
o m
> m ns
L
al
7 Y
E U
7 D? O P
U O
O L
000010 _0
0 1 E Flo ?? 0
fh O
a)
- D

o >
(n
rn 2
E
E c > Q
`- Q)
N U
? C

N CI LC) (D
Q)
-0
? M
N O
O
d Cn
N N
a
CD N
M M
O Q O
uey; jauy;uawad
c
0
0
U
p N N V O CO O N M V 0 C) 00 (=, 10 ?T CO CO :3
CAD N 00 Cn CND N O O O
0 0 N M Cn N V'
a)
_U
CU
N
O M CO LO CD N N LO c O 00 O CO N N N? n
O O N N V CD CO N O LQ CD
666 p ? N CO V CD O N CO CO O O 75
3 N m y N di N N C6 CD MM m 2 2 2 0 E :E :5 -0 0 0 O V v v ..
O Q7 U a) Q) a) a) 0) CT 0)0) CT O) (M 07 U U U U 0 0 0 0
U a ?_ ?_ c w m o cl E E o m m- N 0 a-0
o
c c c E2 m m 21 E
d Cn a o o ? as m ns m m m m
E U U O O O o m `-° `-° N m `m
IL > j E E E E
> O >
d > >
m
U
c
O
U
O
0
c
O
U
(S3
O
> 76
O U o
number of particles o o
C? C. N M
O) 00 ro (00 LO CD C) V oM N O C)
:?I-I-

O

O U

CL
p
Xt

0

>
to

N O
E
N (D
a)
U C
N (6
d
O)

o
N
0
O

3

D_
'a
L

0

o

O
7
E
(O
) Y
U
2

0
7
U O
Q O 0 O
O
O Q

CO
O N
-0
75
0
E Q p O
E L
a)
O N

E

a)
a)
Q) E o o °> o 0
O
_U C O U
r
? fD N
N
L >
o
0 O (n O

a)

O
Q-

CO C
O

`

0
M
N Q O
O
Q N _
N

O CO N
(D
a)
o
Q
O
I r?i i ?i I O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O ( O O O O O O O O
O O) O r (DLC)a M N
ueyf jaug fuaaad
O IOIO r NIV COIN ?I? NIMIV I(OIO NI?2INIM CIO
C
O
C C
O 7
a
m -
O
0
C
O
U
O
O
OIO O O ?INIV COIN ?IN MIV (?O O NIW CO NI(f)
N a) N a) a) m 0) CA O) m 0 O O ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 L)
-- E E I'D 111) (1) a) m m m w w 3 U) U) E o E °'
a) -o -o cu (0 co m E cu m 2)
> iE L, > E E
a) Z E a) E
> a) a) >
T
(0
U
? ?C ?^ x ? •-- V'1 C •-- C
C M
R
v
L
Q
O
R
C >
C 5a
r?
•• `
x x
e
°

O
F
Q ?
' V.` d 'fl R ?' R
a. eE
R ? r y
Q 3 ? ar y
a w ? 3 o? = L S E L F

7
?
(Z f
a
Q
W
C
? .
?
y
C .
4 h • LI ' Q C ? C) r
x
C Y Y C x R _ L x
O
o
y
C
C R 7 G R ?v, C e
C '

f
?
m
=
?
?
?
3
r?
co
U c
Q

c
0
_ o
Y O
? p
co LL
1 i

1 1

1 1 i

,

1

1
1

1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
Y 1
{ 1
1
1 1

I
` I
I
0
I--

C)
In
0 ?
C
O
Cl)
O
N
O
0
't 0
OD 00 00 00 co
(19aj) uogena13
O
CO U?l I- CO
OIOIO1,0CD I OI°I0IM aO I OO I CO I CO I COI M MIO ICO IOOI CD CD IcoCD 0 a, 10 N In 10 N 1- 10 CD CO CO ID 10 LO 10 a, 00 1 co C0 07 00 7 ? "' ? OJ N W Y- f- f? f- f- I? h h co ?o ?
I C 0IM MI'MI0) -; ?I-I-IUISO ICI-I

(n
w N NIA

m m N'•

co r

r n (D

(O fO

(O N

C r

N r

O
J
w of W O
r r N
r aD
n O
r N
r c0
r aD
n of
r CO
r
O W m

-
-
-
CO
w
w CO

1 w
I
N
w 3

Wa ?

u; o

m ?

m e
r
m
(O
o?
i0
m n
N
eo rn
O
r ?n
O
m v
CO
r co
IQ
r
w

E
m

N
N LL

LL
0 m

Y
I
'
__ o ? 3
U m 1 co m
F LL LL'

3 _ _ - __ - - - - - o
in

? L
a c7 ?
,_ I

E a 3

c
c
U) 0-
LL 0-

- = O OOOO OOO
'- O OO
.- OOO
?- OOO
r OOO OOO OOO OOO OO O
r
m
O
f0 m
w
W C
o
N
d
.
0
C?
_ - 1 _ _ __ __ _ - C N c71 ON (O?? TI ?OO O OO OOO A OOO OOO OO O
N
L IL
N
N
6
r N
nC6 n
n
? r
n
?
r -
r
?

n
n

r
(y ) uo pene 13
' s
•
•
i
number of particles .c°- _0 - E o
°
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o o Z) U) CO
r 0) 00 n O LO V M N O 00 U
r - C
)
N
O
O CO CO
p N "O
_ O O
O N O
O
# O
V) 3
4)
U C
O
C

°° CO ia
c m O
?- d
E o
°
-----__- ° > L

N E
U LO

O

O U

0

-1
D O
U +I
a °o J
-----
00

O

-°

o
U 0
U)

° ° p 0
? o

m - -
-
2

N
0
U
(h CD
a)

m
a
p o i o

O T CM
C) -
O_ LO
M (D
O ` 70

C o
N o Q N N
O
U Q
j -E 04
al

O
O
Q
O
O
T
?U
o
M
N
CD .
-
- °
(n
= H X
ai
0
Z

0 21

0
0 0 o
O c
O
C
o m LO C) m CO O C to

N O
0 :3
O
r
ueyl jaug;uaajad U
U) -o r O U
E
CO a) M
N
Cn
c
L
a;
L
L
X
a
a
c
7
O
U

00 ?
N
? o
O 0
O
O

C:I N N V (O CD O N N V O
00
0°0
l?
(ND
N
N
V
C
O
O
X 0 0 O N M V CD Q) N M (O O ON 0 0 U
(6
_
a>
m O
M 0 0

° ?

N

V

(D

W O N

N N

CO LO

V V

CO O

O M

N O

CO (D
X)
(0 N
N_
N
0
CO
0
_Q
(6
a) O O O O N CO (() N O
N_

? ? ? ? ?
C C C C C a) a) a) N a) a) a) a) a)
> > > > > > > > > a) a) a) a)
-0 .n -0 -0
-O -p -O a "O Y C ?
U CO O .O
?
m To MW To m? m? as ca m m m m m
m m m m b) m m ???°
O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 2 Q O .
° 3

_ c E2 12
-
co
w m 0 a a) a> a>

c c c c
z) - c')

CU 0) 0111
? 9 fl -0

E0 ?
OO
o
?
w _ _ a
E
m`m
w
?_
> 0
EE v
? 0
> a?i m > >
J? I I I - > > I C
C
U
G1
Z
m
a
FU
number of particles 0 - w o

C
D
Z 0 r
CO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
0) 00 I- M In V M N 0 N
00 O
O U W N a)
O a) _0
CL E
O o

° N
O O O

rn 3

M
O
C) CO M
0
- CI-
-
0
m O
°
>
I '
m r
0
7 U
M
O U
2
o
7
U 0 O
I ?
L
U O +

(0 T

0
V - - - - - - - - - - Q O 7
O O
H E

N
0 E U N
:
O E
0 O .--
? c
O
= U 0
U U
c m
? w
7
U U) 0

5 >

o
° ? p o ui m 0

N

N
a T 01

L)
d `

0

U
O
m Q LO
M 0
O o
N p 0 a? h
D
U)
U) 0
o F
? .v _
O
CN
N (0 _ O O o
S1 d N O
? CO
a) N ?p In N
CL z x
N
0
Z o

0 0 o 0
0
C D rn rn 0 c V) CO D

ueyi jauy juawad
E
? o
E w cc
M a) M M 0
-2 (n ?D

o
rn
?` 0
0 0
0
U

E Cj
p C-) L,
N
N
V
CO
00
M
IN
N
LO
Nr
0

00
N

(D
W

LO

(NO

N 'IT

Cq 00

O (D

0 C:

0

O
E
O 0 0 0 N CO V O N M LO O N ?t U U
N ?p
V
t6
d C

O

N

2

In

CO

O

M

N

N

'IT

CO ?

Q
O cc
o ? LO
N
V
(O
CO
O
N
CO LO
V
CEO CD
D1
N
O
CO (N

O

O
C
i
O
O
O
N
CO
U)
N
(6
C O
C
L "C a 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 a) a) a) Q) 00
N
0
0
m Y U (6 C 0 O

V

>

m MW m MW m
000 > > > > > > > ° >
>
m M m m m m E E m
L L L

0 , "O 8
O '
6
"
'O
DDD>> 3
'U
o a o
o m 0 0 0 0 0) °' 0> 0' 0) m 0) 0) 000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 m?-E
m a
.N 0
C 4= LE5 N a? 0 a? E E 0 0 a? a?
7 7 - 0 0
(4 7 a a n
m (1T E
0) n r 7 M

`
7
O j- 0
°° w 0 0 0 0 0 -° `-° E E C m `m 0?

v a
)
> L,
> E E
a>
E
> E °
> 0 a
> > >
L
d
a
c0
o W (n No o ? nl
n,
0

w Y
LLJ
W m

J LL
LL,

W LL
LU

i w ?

t-
-
-
-
-
= J
w 3

.
.
_
_
_
_ M I? ¢? M tD O) m N

- - - ?
-- - w

Q
N
- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -

N ? Y

m - - - ? I vim
U L _ ? LL ?

?' i m w LL J
7

~ L
t0 N

lr - -
r - - -
? - - - - - - -
I - - 1 - - - - to a

f -

?
- - - - - - _ o oo o.o O o 0 0 00
?
i 00 0
,
i 0 00
- - - - - z o 0 0 0 0 o;alo o
o
o o
o
o o,o 0
0
W o
?

-
-
- -
- -
-
- N N ,
- - - - -
U C O O W ? C7 ? ? CIO O O O O10 O
OOO 00 O

U

O m ? V
r r ? r , I ?
i (U ) uo ilen al3
I
I
O

w ? 1 1

t Y
C 0

1

e

r co O
co U O
(.0
7 -

_ yr 1 1 1 1

o 1 1 1 1
4
t
,, _ ,_, ,y • 1 1 O
1 1 LO
1 f
ti M 1 A

?

e I 1 L
j

S `?y?.iiq?' ! 1 O
g
w

w
i. r yu,• 1 1 O

?

I
a„ 1 1
I
y'? 1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 N
1
1
1 1
1
A
I 1
1 1
1
O

1
e 1
1
1 I
G
? 1 1
Y e e I
0. ?
O
r
co
O co co
g =
(Ia0J) u01jen
a13
O N 9 9
Ci (n M M. O F L.
F- Cn N r
D X <
_ O
c 6A (O I-- V O m LO M N LO O M N U') U') m P.- O
W O m- t` -t h- O O Ln -,t O O r O .. O O
m W NNm m r-- rl- LO LO V V V LO(Dh? ???OO
L
Q
to
01 d
C

m
to
A U
D
A d V i
LA Ln Ln Un
?_ lC
t0 d
? lf) LO O N M It lf) (O I- co O O O N (`7
0 t1)
?
?'C GOLL O W N mMm Mmm MCA M MeF? V ?Lnw(o

'^
a,
M,
m
?
o0 r
0
C
,_
Ld
d
L
a O
C >

d o

u _d

W

= w

Y
X
c
c
C O , C R O

a w v 3 G o r s ? ? ^ :
d ?_ ?_ t L A+
O N CC
Qi t 'd
" ?
? OD
L
r
G 7 7 7 0. G
A A C .
[ ?
"„ R
? e e c ? o ? A b e a u
p o a ? ? ? ? ? m i c

c
c
r
3
c
? 1 1 r

'?
? o
1
.
a ~? 1
ii
V
?r Cfl
?
4
I
?V??dMJ ?i l?

O
LO

R

? "
? ?
7 ? tr as
Af
' M L;
tti l' .???
? t ?,? E
?i r
ti S•i: d w
t t
t
^
o
+
V] U O

a I

Er

O
N

i
i
O
I
i

I
?
0-. ?--+- r-? °?- O
On o Cr0 ^ ^ r
O
p
o
(laaj) uOileAel3
_
a N v
CC VJ cC ° __ _ -

X o <

_ 0
o
N °? NOLflr-N 00MM? LO LO?M0M
?] OO ? I? O M 00 O O M ? V LO O ? M O O
ip LO Ln LO LO LO M M N M LO LO LO LO LO
y ? Q
C
m N t
c V
`
y A
r •? '?•?
? O M LO CO h O
_ lC
R X 0 0 LL O O LO CO 00 O O N M V l17 CO In In In O
O
- N N N N
M
O
.
N M
M M M M ? L
O i`

?
O V
r `.
[? ?
? V
N 7
.- M
v? ?
p ?
.-. O
O
C p
?
Cd
d
L
<
C
G
C
• i
v
? 7
?
Q V LT i Y p o
G: CC
v
?• ? L 9 d d C0 z p d L .•; u
Q .-? ? L L a? LC .C •y bA
o - o o- d "
C A CC ? y ? ?
Y Y Y '^ •? X C A L ? v
U a m n ? ? ? e
7
? ? a 6
? A
3 c
a
o
Y ?
O O
N
m LL
1 1
? 1
,

1

,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ,
1 II

r"
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
`
f 1
? 1

Wm r?M r
Miorn ?
? m
v, ?n
v, v
v v
e c?
v, c?
v, ?
v
W3
W LL
J Y
W m
L- - - - - -? - _ - W QI
W
- - - -

_

_

p

W
LL
W J
- - - - - - - -
-

_ _ - -

_ -

_ - -
-

-

- - - > N
W ?
W N
th O N V ?f1 N t0 O O> O

N
m
?
- - to

LL m
IL

N - N
U) co
-
?
-
- m
o
3
)
-- - - - - - - - °'
rnm

1
1 a m

c
C
LL L
-- -- - - - - - cnm
LL f-
- -- - -

I - -- - -- - -
- = O
0 Oi000
OOOO 0IO0
O O 0 OIOO
0 O O OOi0
00 O 0,O0
Oi00

_ _

-

- C O (n
m
C
O

-

- >
d
1 N W O
-
U C N OIO N
r S N ?? cqO'O O O O
_ _ _ _ __ - - C m
N N VN I
AIM Q VO r NO?O OO,O

C ?

N
? t
D C
N
r C
(
r V
r r
r
r
r
r r
n
r
(14 ) M IUA0 l3

number of par
ticle
s >
o -0
-
r
0 0 o O O
I- O O V CO O o
N O N N
U
CD
.7
O
o
m C
n m
a
0 O
p V 00
O O

I Xk, U N 3
i a)
O

o o m
m
a
y
n
0 ? o
> L

-- 7
U
Q
O

U o

C -- OD
M
O
? C)
- - - -- --- - -- -- - -

- - E
(0
?o 0
, o

U) C) N?
U - - T0C D a) m O
o c >,
C a) .0
N = _ _ U
N d - - - - - -
_ __ ___ - -
__ - N
•N C
Q)
4) a) LO (D L)

Q)
U
: M

N O

O
?p
0
CO
CO
d -- - - - - - C
m ? _ m

?
o Q

O (D
CO
d
U O O
O U
= I
cy
C)
_ K
O
O
Z
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
C
00 C) (D CY) 00 0 fl- (D LO o ?0 0 0 0 0 o c n
a? 0
o

L
1 r
ueyj jaug jua
ojad
rn -o U
v N U
C
IM Q) M
- 1:2 -U) D-
`c
C
L
a
L
a
w
M
O
U LO
w
N o
O c
O

(O
.M-.
N

N

v

CD

ap
O
N
N
LO
V
O
CO
N
O
M
(O
N
N_
N
00
00 (D
O :3
O
O
E 0 0 O N M V (o O N M 0 O N V U U
E
O
m U
? O
C
CO
O (N
p
6
N
N
V
(O
00
O
N
co
V
(D'T
0 O
N
- 00
'O
(ND
N It
O 00
O C
N
N C O O - N M LO ? N YO

'O -0 -0 -0 -0
C C C C C N N 5 N o N N N 41
> > > > > > > > > _N 2 N O
'O "O "O "O Y C -O
U (6 o .(0

m
m N VOJ (? N (0 N W f0 f0 CO (0 m m
0 0 n O.
-
-° 3

°?
c c E m L71 ?T m p7 Q7 O)
m m m a? a? 0 0
0 0
0 U L) U
0 0 0 0 0
o
5
D Co U m
0 0 o Z m o 0 0 o

-
E o m c`a

210
E E `-°
z
> E 0 E E 0 0 0 U v
a -5
0,-- U
r E
> a
i a
> > > N
>
L
C
L
a'
r
L
a
a'
>
N
number of particles o o
V
000 COO LO 'OIt M N ° O O to in 03
0 0
O

O

O U

CO
CL

c

o

o
> C
to Q)
-0 Q)
a) C
N

'n m
a?
U C
O
CO 16
O -0
m
?

0

O

N
O
_0

0

C

Q
-2
CO
r

o

0

o

O
?
E Y
U
2

o
U O O 0 O
O
O
'cT
CO
O N
o
O
E
ro
N

E U
N
m
a? E co
O
Y o
0
U
C
? U
CO
CL CO
L (4
(n O _
>

o
a) LO O to O
0 O
C )
N
U ?
N
(1 CO
(D
O N
U
o
CO
N C'
O
a CCn N
M
U
O
(D
(ND T
m
0
o

1 CO
tD
C)
U)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O) 0 r- (D «) V CO N
uey; jaulf juaeiad
? to
N
O OIOI- INOIL ?IR NIMI?I? ?2INIM COIO
C -?!
O N
D
C C
O
O
a U
0
0
C
O
U
O
O 1?2OIOIO ?-IN VI(DIWI?I?IN MIV CDIO NI?INIMItt)
w 0 O N 0 z -_ ._ ._ ._ - :- - O O O O O D D D
O O 0) 0) "' 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) U U U U 0 0 0 0
c C N N N 0) N £ N N N N- S] .O
10 C 7 7 (6 7 °) O (6 <0 E O7
o o Z_ 0 0 0 0 0 o a T N N
N > o
> E 0) E 2., E D E
> 0) N >
T
(0
U

P? . .?,
Z w N O
C f`
'
Y
1
C 0
O
O
1
i 1
.?`y
yJ ? x''?: e
1 e 1
1 1 1 1
1 O
O
? 1 1
? 1

1 t o wit -ft..

' Ile

3
oi?
J

'

r
? ? y
? 1
1 1
1
?
.f ? s r
O .

x r
e
Y a d
~`
c a4
?
'
'

I
1
1 m
r
?t+,
?.
. r
.
7
fff
' O
'1 1' ;
r ?
?
ly
V1 U 1 1 M
? 1 1
? ! t
n
~j i 1

C '- V x? C1 [? C L

If- I t
i 1
1 O
N
e /
e 1
1
I
P
1
1
1
CD
fl 1
! 1
I 7. 1
I ?ti 1

O

ILO 1
Y
O

t N 00
O CD
C- W e3
y
o (jee j) UQIIena13
U
o z
O
c N
N 'C A
cC ? ? V c-
- Zw)
0
H d
w In (o io N CO O (D (D t` O (o
O V 07 e- t- co F- co V (o D) (D N O V
N 00 oo d7 V M M
0 0 D) N
10 --o- 0 0 0 co 0 0 (9 t` co D) 0 0 0 0
y
L r-- 1- r-- r-- f` H M O (D M M O M O O h 1` t-- f` 1--
H ? Q

L to U
d :: A a; a (n M (n (1)
t6 V] L IQ d7

>C O D lL
IR 3: O O r O - N M "T v) (D I- r- M O - to U> (o O
0 N N M co co co co co co co m co (M tt V (o co 1l-

O^
N
o
r
r x
N a m
M
O
,_,
C
C
7
ca
u
L
Q
O

C v
W ? Y
c
Q ? U 'C R ?
i+ ?
o R Q 3
H

r y ?
c
c tC
?
o C a+ 4.
R' W C j 3 r
++ E

w

a?
bn
? ? o .a
rs
a
a
A
C4
?
,x
V
L
CC
Y Y Y '9 "? C A ? Y ? ?
C C C Q Q ? y C ? ?

C W UJ ?N 0 0 0 r rn

? w
co m m
?
co
?
co
co
- - - - - - - - - - W w
J Y
W CO
_ _ _ _ _ W co
I _ J J

_
_
_
_
- W
_ _ - _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ J
w 3

_ -
- - -

_

_

_

_ _

_ N
N W
(O (O
i1J V
r V
V ?
<p ?0
<D O
O M
r T
?

_ _
_ _ _ /
_
_
_
_ -
- -
- W ,O
J ?
W r
(O cD
cD (D
cD (D
cD (O
(O N
(D tD
lp (O
(O (O
(O (O
t0

O
LL
w
O
-
- -
-
- -
- -
- -
_ CD
cnm
U L - I w ?

U p _
? a) o]
(0 1
a
a ?
c

C
LL H
- ?- ?- - ? - - -- - - - = O OIOOO O OO OBI Ohio OOO O?OO
- -
- - - ?m
o

N W a
- - _ -- - - _ -- -
N
? `n ??? o
s
v c
N_ N r oo 0 0 0 0
- -- -- -- -- -- --
O
O
r N r
n ? t
?
(g) D
O
uope Q
?
na3 N (
? ? O N
N O
> m
N
number of particles .g r
I N m
C) o ?0 0 0 0 0 0 N
?
V) M C14
O U
LO
O
O
U
C
0
U
M
N

C
O
U
N
.0
0
a
U
U
H
m
C
O
O
U
N
d
O
a

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- --- -- ---
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1-- -- ---- -- ---
I -
I
i
I,
I
I,

O

o
O

?k

0

0 N O

.N
N
O
U O

? N
a -0
m O

O O

O
3

C
(0
O_

m
E
Y
L)
7
U C;) O O
Q ?
N
¦ ?
IL
11 1
o L-
0
LL
CO O -°
00

C)
cO
o 0
i
> O
C O U
CO
N 5

E
?p
o

m
w
>
E T m
N `

0 C
Q) °- M co
c
r N 0 O d U)
N N
O_

O O N
O O
N
O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O Q1 a0 1- O ? V M N
uey; jaui juaniad a)
?INIV I(O ICOI?IOI NI MI I- COIOI?IW NM 10 IMIMIO
C
7
O
U
O
O
c
7
O
U
O
O
CO LO CO I?IN
IO IOIOIO ply NIV I(OINI?I?IN MIV I(?OIOI?I?INI M ?O
N N N N O
C C -C .C > > > > > > > > > O -0 .0 -0
(6 T N N N N N (0 (6 N (6 (0 N f0 (0 (6 S] .0 "O "O "O
CO `p) p) m m m O O O O
o E o U U U U o 0 0 0 0
C N U N N N
-? c c c E E N N N O= 1] 4 O
E 2 E °m o E a a
CO O w w O m m m E 7 O7 (0 (0 O m Q
m E00 00 0 0 0ou ?`-°-°NN m0 L) m
> O E E >> E > E
> >
m
U
>
number of particles .0 -, N
V
LO CD UO V V O O CO
LO O O N 7 N
M CO N N
O O
LO
0 o
41 = a5
(D
d 2 H
---------- ----------
----------- ----------
--------- ----------
LO
U
M
0
U -
U
m - -- -- - -- ----
c -
0
a)
9
L
a)
I
I
I
O
O
=

O

C)
? U

CO
0.
p

at

o

a)
]
to
-0 a)
a) E
N O

o)
m
U C
?E .?
fD CO
Q "O
a)
O

_

O

M

N
N
'o
:6
O
O
3

CO
O-
?
m
L
m
J

E
?C
U
O
U Q O
O I
O l+ N
?

O
O a)
o
E
o .(0 E LO Q
a)
U E o
" Q 0
Y o

M C
CO 41

(0
Ll w
Z
Q o >
N

a) ?
Q Ln (o U d

CY)
)
N C
CD
O

N N
Q
U)
O
o N (0
m
o

O
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o

O O O O C O O O O O O O
O O O M LO V M N C
p
O C
C
0 7
N
a) Q) o
ueyl jauy juawad 0 E 0
-

E FU
C
N N C
6
o
.n U) CL -0

c
Z3

O
N

r

N

N

0
O

0
O
U
N
N
V
(O
O
O
N
M U)
( 00
N CD
CO (0 N

M ?! V

O CO

O (O C

O C

O
E
E
C) 0 0 0 V (
o O N LO
N O
d
O Q) a3
m
CO

O

co"

?2

N

N

V

c0

M

M

N

N

to

V

O

CO
N

17?1
O

10
Ln

(NO

N

N
00
V ?
M
O- O
N D O 0 0 N M V (J M c- N CO to O O
N N
O
CO
-0 O
C C C C C a) a) a) 41 a) N a) a) a)
> > > > > > > > > a) a) a) a)
C) L L
L a) a) a) a) a)
"
'
" Y C

m
>
m m M Ms MO
w n n 0 m
m m m m m m as E m .

0 0 O
O
O
8= :
81 81 O 0- O U
_

3
.`
°

(D
U
N a) a) a)
°'
°' °' °' °' °' O o
U U U U O
O O O
O
0 L L
0
0 o
0 O 0?
(O . w C 7 i2 E2 0 0 N E E N N N N - a) a) -
-
- .? L 7 N
U 0 0 0 0 (- - m `m
U) o
E > E f
> l
a) > a)
E
)
a
I

F
• K,. Q
, \
. 00

7
qq,,
"4f:
x
C p 1

/
71
?? -i 1 1
?+ ? 5 1
..
t t
,' O

y 4 ,? C 1
r, EE33 .,' ?/ 9 /

3 R f 7 V
con
F 1
1 1110

F 1
Q)
u 1
t ? d ? O .
.
' °
l F
E y
=
1 co
r N
/ " 1
L W

1

w 1
L
CE
i
1
4 1
t 1
1 1
O
I 1 1 N
I e 1
1
1 1
1

I 1

1 1

1
O
?
1 1
1 1
1 1
?
O

to F F
Y CD
t ti °
E O
06 C
O C
O
o
5. 5-

uol)enel3
v
O `
y
O
CV v
N?>
Y C -
_ od

fA ? f-- M N M CO M Cfl M N N? CO Fn
W M O O N co O CO O O N M-t Cfl O CAN to
Ip N N N O O M(o(D r(D W O O
O CO CO CO O O CO (O CO ? ?
W d Q
0 d o
m H
Iv U
L
?'

> L d CO V CO f? M N

X 0 0 LL O O O m M Cn CD CO f- 00 M N O O O
O N M M V ?7' V ?t V V 't LO CO r- co
?
O
R
L
Q
o

Q

e

v
u
w

s ?

Y
Y
a

°-
'

o
r
Q o
a+ y
V1 R 'O o
R R
Q] R
?
R

o h L L
Q
3 m
?
?
z o
U b
3 G c ?
s ? o ?
? a
.c ^: ,
:
w y • ? ?
Q ? L d R Z C7 b
A
? Y Y Y o o x ? Q L Y d u
C C C ++ C
f m ? ? ? ? ? ? w m v c
r 3
W U7 V N N O> rn N OJ

-
--
--
-
-- '- LU ?? cO? tD ? m c?o to

?
-

_ -
- _

- -
_

-
_

-
-

- -
-
_

-
_ --
-

- --

-
LL
W Y
J
W m
Ir

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W
J
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ th
N N a0
N (D
N N
N r
tO W
cD N
O ?
rn
-- - - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - - -
J
(O
tO
tD
(O
(D
(D
fD
(O
(D

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- -- - -- - -- -- -- --
- -
- - _
- _
- - -
- _ _
- _ _
- - - _
- - _
- -
LL

N ?- - t-- - -- - -- LL
rn Y
O
N
__ _ - _ - - _ _ _ __ u Nn7
U LL D
3 --
-- - - - -- -- -- -- to
CO o
` U) m
H - ? L

? U
d N

c

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

I
_
_
_
- _
_ _
_ _
_ - U) a

-

_

--

--

_
--

-
-
- v

?
2

0

o
_ _ - -- -_ -_ -

_

_

_

_
_

_
_

_
_

-
_

_
_
- m
0?
7
C
0
L ij

--
--
-
-
-
-
--
--
--
c_ m
r old
ao???? m iv o
???0 0 0 0
0 01,0 0 0 0
0?0?0

? 0
c
o o
f o v N
f a i rn
m m e `D m
c o c n m
(4)
u01le rn
nal3 rn m c o
0

.x 4 f ? 1
C 0 1 O

? m LL 1 (?
y
rl . b ?: ]r 4
i
1 1
1

s 1 1

- s 1 Lr)

Y" af'r j Vl , O

CL C1 ' o

Cl)
? U 1

L ?
C6

4 1 O

, N
I
C 1
I
I
j 1
1
1
1 O
?
1
I 1
1

I 1 ? ?

E
Q
A- 2- c"I CD 00
fl- Fl- O (D
co
O
(10,9j) uogenal
g
E C) _
L
0
>

-,t O m co O N O O O N O m 1- m 1` 1l- O O co O N
W - O N N N- 1- O 0 0 -? N CR N It m lh m O- O m
. . . .
m m m m m w t` 1- O O It 't LO co O 1l- h t*- O of m m m m

4) 4) C
O CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O co O
r+
Y

O O c'') V O 1'- CO m O N co v U') 0 r- O m N CO LO co
O( N N N N N N N N c+? M M M M co m M m (n 'IT 't
O O
M C C Mfr [? V N ? ?O O
c pp
ie
v
L
Q
O
C > 7

Q O
.U G)
w ?
? Y
C
?
Q ? V] .. 1 L
'O ca m CG e"e

c ? y
o L
.? L
a
3 m
?
?
a
w
? a o ? ? o s - ?
CG W U 3 s d ,
,
bA
? o A
R ? ? ? ? a
i m o y
m m z E w ? ? 3 w m v c?
W (/J N O [O r n r t0 V
m J ?j
LLJ m O N N N N
-- -- -- -- -- --- w LL
m
W
w m
J a

_ _

_ _ _ -

_ - - - - W LL
J J
LLJ I
_ _
_ - _ _
- - _ _ _ f_ _ _ - _ _
W
!
-
-
-
- 3
_ _ -
- N
c0 Q
Q N
N N
O O
V
m O O
OJ N
r V
m
W .?
LLl N C ,p V V

- p N
?
N
LL
_ _ _ 1
Y - _ - - - _ - - _
N y

d a ? mi

N
_ U) co
- - - - - - - -
- ?
co
=
_
_
_
Q -
- -
-- - -- -- - --- iw Wm
- - - - - - - - - -

-- - - - - - - - - - -

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - D
-- -?- -- -
__ ---
__ --
_ -- rnLL

F
LL

1
- _ __ __ __ ___ -= O OO OO
F F OOO OOO OOO OBI OO

__ C
5

- - -
- -
- - -
- -
- - -
- - W O -

f" o ? co ? °i. rn °. II
?''o 0 0,0 0 0 0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I
- _ - - - - - - " - - -
C
O

c T
0
c0
(g) uo
c
penai3
G
c.
I
•
i
i
i
•
i

numb er of particles .o r w o
C. O O
(o L V O O O
M N O _
N
O N Z3 (n M
O U
O
o m C
CO
E N :6 .1
- O N O N 0 0

a?
m
S
I M

n ° OR

? C,
7E
-- -
- - - - _- -_- -- --
- - - - - - - - - _ o
]
a)
(0
(0
16
?7'
U rn ? 2

'O 0
7

O
I
+ Q O
U

-
TT
C-

O -
-
-- --
-- ---
---
- --
-- --
-- --
-- -
--
00
--O
o
0
a -- -- --- -- -- -- -- Q o
U -- -- -- -- -- -- --
U

U
m
- -
-
-
-
-
o
E Lo
E (.0
?-
-1
o
CU Q
U
= C
CO O
O
d
:3
C

O E

E Q

C N M
(n
> cc
CD
O O
N N - - - I N C
a N N
d r N Q N N
C `7N
- N -
CJ
U)
O
U o
E ? X T
m
N .-. O
o N Co
2 H X

0
Z
0

o 0 o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 o
O c
O

C
O M CO ? (ID CD CD CD 0 U') V OM N O O C
N (n
N O C
O

L 0 E 5

v
uey; iaugfuaojad N a ?E N m
n m m ? ?

1
L
a
L
L
a
a
a
c

O
U

N

N

t0

N

N
C
O
C)
O
_ CO U') LO
N
V
(D
CO
r O
M
? CC)
N O (D N N ZT 00 (0 C
Z)
O C
O
E C) 0 0 O N V CO N M O N
CD 0
0
E m
N
O O

CO

a

O

N
p

N

?

-

N

V

O

O

?

m

N

M

?

coo

m

N
CO

O
T

(O
LO

N
CO

N_

O

O
O CO

O'
(6
N O O 6 0 N M Ln N O

V)
7 "6 '6
C C C C N O O N N O N O N
> > > > > > > > > N O N N O O N N N

"6 "O
2
2 Y C "O ?

U (6 O U
cOn Umi vOi (Oa (0 (D (0 O (6 (6 N (6 (D

a m m m m m m ,p
o 0 0 o _
:2

0 0
.
`O "O O
a 3
L) _
- U U
0 0 o 0 0
O 0)
L
(6
Z
O` N
N O N N N N O
u)
- N N
CO E
.
? O
oo ? a m o 00o m16 EmE 2)E may
> E E E U v v U a) (n N -- -o
> ? > E
a
i > . L L
C
C
U
a
.n
m
a
>
C: ?O
number of particles o w
o °v 0 0 0
(0 LO CO (Ij 0 0
O U ?
O U

CU to CO
N

O 'O W

E
N
N a

O
N
O O
3
m

O C)
c
.2
r
c
M
O o -
m 16
Q •a ^ a
° c
- - o
- -- -- -- -- -- ------ m
c
U
V O r "
O O

M
a)
V a)
_O
o
U c
0 o
U) E
Q) _
l!)
E C
0 Q

M . CO
CD
_ C O U

? C
a (6
0
U N
(0 U) O V >
o

N Q) LO
N
f4 (?
CO

U - - - - _
(2)
2
- 0- M
LO
N N
N U
C
CU
M
O
C/) O
U

o T
m

M _. O

D N
75 O

N
2 H X ' ? ?

O
Z

0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C _
O O O O O O O O O O O
O O CO 1- (D LO -,T M N ? O
O C N
N a) O C
O 7
O
uey; jaui? fuaaaad ate) 75
i5
u)
M a) CO
ca o
?O U CL.
..
R R it It R

0
(V
M
IA
to
N 0
O 0
O
U
E O CO N
LO

r

N

V

a7

C

O

04

N

'T

0

N

0
00

CD

O

N

N

CO
'It

(0
0)

C:
:3
O

O
E 0 0 0 0 N V 00 N (7 lf) 0 0
N 0
't U U
O a) m

O
(NO

p
CO

N

V

0

O

O

N

N

V

?
CO

N
O
O
N
N
CO

a O

O o o C5 (
O N CO O N a7
N_ O
'O _0 •O 'O 'O
C C C C C a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a)
> > > > > > > > > c ID c c
.p
M a) a) a) a)
a -o -0
- `1 C 'O
O a
o

m
>,
M
m m as m as
V) fn N N fn
ca m m m m ca cv co m
? ? a?
0 0 0 0 0
0
7 0 0 0 0 U

_° -° 3
Q)
76 a) Q) E m m
c
E2 e a)ma)?a)? ??
m a) m E E a) a) a) a)
- a) n?°?°?° ?° n) m
s

U
. c
w
M M
'O
0
0 E - S E 7 0 E T E

. .-
w
v) 21
M 7 E

E -_ _
E O a)
(0 a3
>, 'L
0 L) a) 0 0 0 0 O i a1 O
v E E a) (0 U 'a

co I

? ' i 1 Cfl

Y 0 1
Al
C
-2

, co LL 1
rytdp. I 1 F i
1 1
?. 1 1 I
O
1 LO I
L 1
1
1
I" w
At. 00

+ L
L"i Q)

F 1 o m

R M ?

i

a 1
F 1
R
1
1
1 N
1
1
i
O

1
1 I

C
1
0. O

O C14 0
!? fl- 00 (D
(0 (D ?t
(
0
o 090 UQIIena13 .
(V
O
U
F- is .c c?
F- E) X o Q x

_ C
o
N m m O It O CO w 00 co V' O LO CO m m In 0 O O 00
w (O M -- V O m CO m m- v (O m O- N N- 't -
W L-- I-- O (D CO CO d' V' V C LO LLB LO LO CO r- r- I` M t` r-
(0 CO O O co CO CO (D (O (D (O (O O (0 (D co cc CO (0 co CO
L
H G Q
d d C
m N
to U
'0
d
y

> L d1

Lq
co LO 00
'

>C Ll O O Lo CO co m O O N M V
LO CO CO (D Cfl O
O- N N N N N N N M M M co co co M M co "t LO m
V
0
R
u
L
Q
O
?
C u w Y

Q
Y Lz7 ?
? Y C ?
O
E
„ C R C R ?
o ; ? ? a 3 m ? a
h

?"
?
L

3
d
d

r
.C
O ?
d
E
t
?
.V.J
cc
Q' w
.?
? v
.
w

w 0
L
a o
L
>.
y
o

c :.

a

?

x ?

? „
GA
? Y Y Y 'C ? C Q d Y a: s

'?

CC

CE

R

O

O
x
R
ca
a?
aL.
C

e C

p
u
v?
v: oa m m ? .s. ? ?, 3 w m U c

?yJ (n Q
M M 01
N
N W
Ln
? Q
O nm NCO 0)
n O)
(O
J 3
W NN
(O ?D N
?D M
O N
T
O i0
O Q
[D Q
O Q
O Q
O

.. _
_ _ - -
_ _ - - -
_ _ - -
_ _ - - -
_ - -
_ _
w LL

- - _ J I
W
w LL
_- > y

--
- _ _
-- _ _
-- __
-- _
-
-- W.d.
W 3
..

-- } _
1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N
N O N
CR iO
M Q
m M
M O
M M
?O N
Q Q
I?
n

-r
L
4 ` -

_ - -- -- -- - -

- - - W 9
J

W N
cD Q
<D Q
<D Q
(D Q
f0 Q
(D Q
fp Q
(D Q
(O Q
(O c")
(O

- - - -
-- -- -- --- -- --- --
t

_ _
_ _
_ _
_ LL m

-Y- - -- -- -- -- -- $ LLmn
o o
to

U (n 02

m
c m
LL N
- -- -- - - -- -
O na

I

T
-

^
F_ - --
-- ---
- --
-- ---
- -
--
y
.??
- _ _ - - a
_ - - - - _ - - - - - - -

-
_

_ _

-

-

- _ _

- _ _

-
y
W O
Yp
r
? m ?n ? m ? co n n
I

- OIO
SO
?
? _ _
_ _
- - _
_ -
- - _. -
- -
- - - _
-
- _ _
- -
_. - _
-
- - _

-

O

0
O

(O
t ?(
0 l M
!
O
s
(1}) UOIJEA @J3

n

umb

er o

f par

ticle

s >

o
C) m
C)
.E

o
O O W 7 r
a3
O O
00 O
a
0 O
V O O
N O L!
O
(n
a)
O
CD M
0- CO
(D
E

O
'0
:6

-1
O
p N O O
xt U) m 3
m
• U C
?E .2 C

p o
(9
CO
Q "D

r
o
O

1
==
--
---
-
--
-
- O a) CO W
I_-
-
.
0
__ __ __ __ __ _ (

(D

C

I

- - - - -

_ - -

-

- - -

-- - ?

E

U

0

0 U

o

"O

0
--- -- - -- D O
O
U 1
_
T
°o

a - -

= - - -

- - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - -

- - - - -

- - -

- - _

00

0
a?
o
0

H

E
° E Cc C " -
- - - C
CO -- - -- -- -- -- - C)
_ _ w m

O c
:3

U

-

-

-

-
(n

N

a?
7 N

o
c - E - p o (n o
0 E W > m
U a>
) -
-- - -
-- -
-_
-
-

N
a?

a
a)

w
-
-
-
- _
-

U LO

O M
N M (D

O
C)

O C
Q

O
d
U - - - - - - - - - - ns n
(n O
v - Q
H N CO
o
? d ao ° ° 75 o

2
H
K CD

0
z
i
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
C O C

O
m C (
O D C
( ) 0
O ( C
n V
O
)
O
O O
O C
O
CO
O
O
O
0 E -) U

ueya
jau
U jua
cjad
N -o O
T

C
C
L
a
L
L
a
a

0
U 0
0 0
0 0
0
04
O
?2

(V

N

V

CD

CO

O

M
LO

E
C)
CO
N
C)
CO
(0
(O
(N
(O

N
'T
O
OD
O
(0
CY)
:3
O
M
O

X
0 0
° N V C
O O N
M
([7
? N O
0
'IT
0
U
O
N
Cn U O
cc
p
N
M
CO
N -'T 00 a
O
° N C' (O M N M V Q) CO (f)
(V (O
CO
Ul O O (0
N 0 0 N
V)
"O "O 0_0 'O
C C C C C
M
M O N N N O a) N N N
> > > > > > > > > N O N N
LI LI LI LI N N N N N
-p -O -p -p ,C C "O
U O O .U
O Q
N N
N E N (6 a5 M M m (` N
` tt rt L1 LI
0 0 0 0
7 7 7 7 7 O.
'O 45
a) V a) a) E 0 0 Cn m m m m m 0 01 0 a M N
m r C ?2 12

s` N N (D a) aC E E a> a) 1) (D

C? 7 7
_ a) a)
E
a) O7 Lt .O LI a -

- E (D a)
3
>. .C

E U U ?5
0 0 0 0 0 0 Z3
(n 9 (D
N ;? a7 (0
U "

> E E
E
a) O
> > E

1 aa) U
> > O
>
LI
L-1
C
C
L
a
L
L
a
number of particles
N O O O O O
?-- oo (o V N
N
N
d
CO
x
0
O
Z
> FO
C 'O p U
O o n
a) w a)
N
O ? U
O

)

o
O
3t

o

m
> (n N
N 0
°'

m
m
U CO
•-
(0 ?a
ao
0
`o
O

O N
O
0

C
N

?-
o
m
L
O

o

O
Y
O
U LO
° O c
y1 o O
O T
O

O
O a)
a
Q 7 0
E
O
O N

E

a)
E o o -0 o
°
U C O
a) U
E
d a3
? (9

(n O N
a)
O in O
? C ? 01
a)

a)
CL LO
CO

O
0 C
a)
V
C:

o
N Q O N
d °
w
17
O
O
N
f6
0
Q ? O
CD -
N
0
0 0 O OW O CO O O O N O O
ueyf jaui} luaaaad
rO INO O r NIV (OIO ?I? NIM VIC?OIm NI? NIM I CIO
C
O
c c
O O
O O
C)
0
c
O
U
O
O LO (0 N
=IOIOI°I?IN I?IMIMI?I(OINIMIV I(OIO 04 M
I?II NI MI?IO
o 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > > o o 0 a) a) O
N N N N N 2 m m 2 2 2 m m N O O ? ? 'd o ff=
O O N N O O m 0) m m 01 (M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C w (? N a) m a1 E E a) a) m a) - E
- - ` E a)
`m `O c c > > co rn a)
o o_ m m CO a m m= m
- m m
> 0 o 0 o 0 0-- N E
L, E -a CO
> a) > E E E a) E
> a) a) >
CO
U
O
aa
ty e ? 1
'p O
C
y# (0
tr ° l co U- 1
tr
• ? Y ?a +1 ?, . 1
.? i ,?a f LO
? U e
CA
r?, a: E„ e 1
y f 1 ?
t 1
.i O
l M
' 1 1
? 1 1
1 1 I
O
1 ? N
1 1
1
1 1
1 1 O
1 1 ?
1 1
i
? 1 1
I
a O
v
O CEO CEO co co(NO
(Iaaj) UOi?ena13
y N
r ? x o ¢ x
_ o
In O O r 0 0 N LO- 0- O O r N O h
W In O V. O N LO O O f!') fn O O N ? M M M?
Ip 00 r- rl- (C (C (C LO V V M M M ? LO (C CC CC CO m
y (C O O O O CC (C (C (C (C (C (C (C (C (D (C O CC (D
'O Q
Co •u N
L y D C V
IYO ?. •10 w VJ LO N M C()
L lfl •- 0 0 0 CC O N N M t LO O O 00 O 0 O LO
a3:xdic? O.-NmmmItV V V V v vvvfO(or- r-
M r

cv 7

o
- C

? V,
r
?
r
r,i
N
-
,.-,
oc
N
r
o
-- M
o
°
o
N
M
ie
u
L
Q
O
C > ? 7
O d

W

h
Y

?
C

?

? ; ? ? Q 3 m R a w
?

Q
?
?
? L r.+
y y Rf
a S.
u •6? ?
v bL
L
C.
"C L
'II
? O
C
Ca ?
d x
u
L
Y
C Y
C Y
C O K ? Y
p 6 u
a m n ? = ? ? ? m n o
c 3 r c

> N ?2 6 N N h N
W > <D cD O m N N
- - - -_ - __ -_ w
W co

-
-
-
-
- wm
W?
j J
W

W ;
V N

W

W

M
O

M
O N T

O

O

O

(n
LL
O
?
N
m
LL m

3
d
_ _ _ o c w
m
co
?. _ I V m LL ?
N ? U f

H
E L
° 3

c
c

m ?
O LL L

a
P
- - - - L
L

-
r
-
-
-
-

O
- = O
O O OO
O O O O,O O O O
OI O O O
O OO
O O 0 0 0
OOO 0 0 0
OOO
co
C
O
L G
W O
O
f N
_ _ - - G N V,
M (OLIN OLIO O O O O OO
N
O

V
. O .
O O

(u ? o

. O
) uo f

gena

O
l3

O O O

O

O
•
•
•
•
w
•
•

i
I '
C)
? I

1 ? ? 1
C Q
1
cm
o 1
P co u.. 1

1 1
1
1 0
in

?',1F'§
WW 1 ? 1 1 1
1 v
?I jj??
144'
f 1 1
j?? 1
!
1 1
1
1 I
I

;? 0 1 1 v
r,
?
1
1
?
r ' X 1
°
V
P
1
r
x + cr 1 1
?

C

?1
??^'?• O, V E
1 1
1
O O
"-
9 f' F, I it
y i I
?0
G > 1 1 co

CC 1 1
L 1 1 O

1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1

i 1
?
1 1
1 1
9 1
1 1
G 6 1
O
w: P 1
i
c O
00 (
N O
o Co (O (
O C
O CO
o
N (Iaej ) uogenal3
U p

? :C C
c
0

N O N f? (X) 00 00 r-- V O W CO V CO (T O O) `7
W ' V OOO) U?O)ht- CC) O N Lq CO OAN7 o
!a in if) LO X V V CO N 0 0 0 0 N M q- zr "T
y
L M (O M M CO (O CO CO M CO CO CO CO CO (O CO (D (O CO O
H ? Q

is U
A c
i
c
yi CY O CO M V if') if) M M co
W CQ d

X O A lL O O co (C7 r-- co O O N M
O r N N N N N N M M M M M V i0 M M co CO co
M co M M co V LO
?
? ?
? C
x x
? C
? C
M N
N oC
M --
f? N
-- O
? p
N
R
d
L
a C
o
R •R
O a>
? ? Y
O
d = C R
r O
F'
a O
L' ? s i ? m A a .e3
A ;

? o :? a

d 3

V >? ?
?
a
h
?'
cc
w L
v
3
°
o
y .C
"
?:
e

a
-
- o
`
`
?
Q
R,
?
y w ?,
oL,o
? o o a .
c a Q a x v
? m m n ? ? E ? w n v c

3
? O
>
WU1
W> NN
m,m
tOIO M
m
N M
m
tp M
w
G M
co
G M
co
t0 M
w
G M
m
O N
m
fD
I LL
W m
J Q'
- - -- -- -- - - J J
W
W
d
- -- cl?
-? - -- -- _ ui
w c°o ? m c°o co °m S S S S
E

_ ? -- -- - -- - - cn
LL
O _ f _ _ - _ - _ _. _ _ _ _
N LL
O

U) co

o '?
o
3 I
? o -
-- -- -- - - -- °
o -- I? V) ED

U !

L_
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - d •'

c
c
-
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
-
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- m a
LL H
- --
- -- - -
- --
-- - --
_ -
- = O
O O O O O
O'OOO O O O
O.O,O O 0 0
O OO
? 0 0 0
OOO
I 0 0 0
OO0
o
O co

--

- >
N

_ ?' W O
N

_
_ _ _
-
_ -
-
- _ N
U c
m MIN

O
O?''N'
N''m? [p
O'O0
O10 O
_ __ __ __ _ __ C M O O N
N N O O O O O O
- - - D
--- -- -- -- - ---
O
N
(4)
uopen N
al3 W O
I
it
Appendix F. Reference Reach Data

4
r
O? ?''
N ?
-
O
-
N ?
N t?
-- N
oo ?'
N O O

O p

Q o
?
e a
> -
o

Q O
u _u
w
= c?
Y Y
C
?
F.
Q c °?
?
? ee
L _
? a
? of
m ??/
Yi O
b
cC m
r1 w U 3 ? = - s o E .C .. ?

a c c t o x R
G Y Y Y 9 _ ? ? ? ? 'Y d u
C C G .. O R d }' [ p h
im S
e

0
r
O
0
O
LO
O N
Sr
O
CIO
O
co
O
N
O
0
0 O O 00 rn m m m
(Je9j) uogenal3
r` V O r` w O M t` w O O V N (O 0 LO O N ?t M-t m (O ;T O V M U) N
(O ;z O O O CO t- Ln O V' O (O h LO M - N N V LO t- t- - 0 LO O) M Ln V N
0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 LT Lb t- r- r- r- ?? t-, r- r- ???? r OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O) <T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O) 0 0 0 LT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 O
(O O N V (O N O N Cl) V LO (D r` V^ 0 N Lo r O O N O N M V O L!) M (D
N N N N N M M M M m m 0 r- ? m w 0 0 N N M M V't LO LI) 0 M O O
M M M M M M V V V 7 V V V V V ?t Ln Co
co
` I
a I
c
0
I
a
Y -O
a
m
m LL

1 1 1 1 ?
i
1
1 1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1

i
1
1
1 1
1
?
1 1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1

1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1

1

I

I
1
!
F
1
f

x

IRaI r ,kg E 1' r

i 1
y
A11?
?
21 ?? 3 ? - a

O
C
7
a
L
O
O
0
6)
O
00
O
r
O
O
,O
(n CO
O
V
O
Cl)
O
N
O
0
N O O) 00 !? (O LO
O O O (3) O O O) O
(lGeJ) uOReAO13
0 m (o (D
V 67 O) (O f: LON? M O N LOM M LOM O LO (O N In M O It N CO V' h O M U)
c} V' UC M M I- LO O 61 Ih a N 0 0) - M I'- -- O 't LO 't m M M (() N N (O N h o - O (O O
0 0 0 0 O) O) w w w M M O O O Lo (O co (O m 0 0 0 0 0 6) 6) M 06W W 6 6 66 6 6 W 6
O 6) O O) O O 6) 6) m O) m 6) d7 O) O O O) O) O) 6) 6) O O O D1 6) O O) O) O O O) O O 6) 6) W 6)
W
O CO I? O) m M N 1` 7 (D U? (() M V (f) O N N O? 0 0 0 0 0 O
y, O O O N V t17 (O CO O O
y N N N N N N N M O (M O N M 't LO CO O) (D M (f) 1` O W N (O 1` N O LO V) O O
N N M M M co M M M co co 'IT V In lf) l() LO LO (D r-
M
I . ???

U
O
O
M
?G
N
r-
M
N
'r
0?
N
C:) O
O
O
ca
Q O
a3
C
O _
d ^
w w
Q C y W i A }' O
F' O Vj d 'b C
RS (? O
? w ` 3 a e r y ° ? s :: .?
U y

a
a
a
n.
a
d
A
a
? yZ bL
C C C O O K R A z C d u
m m m w y
„
w m (
3 A
M
N
Q
N
C ?
O
- ?
1

Y O
o 1
C
0
m IL 1

,
1 ,

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1

l 1
1
1
i
1
1
`4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

i
j
il ?rrf? O
f
k
<

00 LL

`"-I
m

40

0
.0
4 J5 $? t t 4} `

/f ;.tr$ W?' ?Y a C O
co
.O
co

.
r
y
C?

L
Cd
O

d
(C
U

O
N
I

x
v O

o
z
o
M
N O m 0
0 rl- (D
o
N O O o o m m m m
z

G (aaaj) uo!Iena13

Z :

?
A
N V
N O cc
'C M
V
M M
m M
(n O
M N
m r`
O "t
(O m
It U')
M V
N U')
It M
10 LO
O M M
(q O
Cl (D
M N
10 N
co M
co (D
00 O
co N
h m in
N 0 to
m O
m M
00 CO
CO M
LO
(D O
O
> m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m 00
m co
m O
m r-
m (D
m (D
m (D
m (D
m (c
m O
m O
m H
m h
m 00
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
m 00
m 00
m 00
m co
m 00
m c0
m O
°
to W
10
? < ;
a
A 01
L
(D

O

o

0

C,-

L
,
-.

n

D

h

m

(y

M

0

N

o

O

O

0

_

0

M

0

to

D

0

0

O

0

M

0

O

0

m

0

(f)

0

O

)

t()

D.

N

`

O

D

O

>
?
l0
3
n
?t
c
c w
l0
o ?
d
i? - N N N N co M M co co co V It It 'IT (n LO m (f) (D I- r` W m m m

N N x N O C ? Q: X 0 0
M

L
C
O

c > o

< ? (/] raj ?.. A '? CG «s

i i y R L ' h

?
?
o
?
c.
a as a> bD
O O ? ? Q i G U
s C
? C
m C
m ? ?
?
5
3
? r
m
?
c

r

r F" GL,
O

I w 1
n
I 1
t
I C
?
I
W

1

1
I 1
1
I 1
1
1
1
a
1
i
1
E
1
1
I
1
f
I
i
a
E
t
E
1
[
f
1
1
1
t
1
B
S
B
EI
1
1
1
I
I
1
1

1

1
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
/
1
1

,
1
1
,
1
1
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
?
1
1
c?
GQ
Q ?
s
ro
:E
a'
u „a
c y
c?
a)
CM U ?g
o Z
o r
m a rn
L L ?
Q)
N O Z3 0
a Z 0 Of
N
O
Z
number of particles
0 U') M °M N N CCU 0 00
O
O
O
Z
C i
J
n
a
a?
1
II i
O
O
O
C
03
0)
E
7 Cn
U to
O I ?
O Ty
_ 0
E C)
E
U
O N E
0) E O
U C)
E C
CU CE
C1 _
U
(n O
c
O
L
0)
a Cn
M
N
0
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O ? ? O ? ? O O O O ?
O
uey; jaw juawad
Cn
(0
12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O CO
? N? M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
7
r
00
rn
to O
O
O
U - N CM

E
C0
M
(V
N
V
CD
(O
N
N
Cn
-
V
O
N
CO
LO
(O
N "t
N CO
It (,0
6)
E C, 0 0 0 N M -q CO O N M lf) O N O) U

L
4) 0)

U

M

O
N
CO
p

N

e-

N

CO

W

O

N

M

N

M

M

(NO _

N

O

O

O
O 0 0 0 0 V N M Cn N CU
C N O
C CO
L C
C N 0 0) Q) 0) N 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0) N Q) Q) 0) 0) 0) Yj
w M C: C C:
Mn N N N N (? (D CO (E (6 CD CD (O (O

O .
0 CB
U (
0 0 E 0 0
MMMMMM a M O O O O
U U U U
O
O
OOmo
OO 'O
t+ C6

2 j C E- 7 L ?2
w N N N N 0) E E 0 0) 0 O
C 7 7 i E2 i
'
= 0) 0)
C(1 Q)) _
m
?O
?
?
E 0) N
0) Q
0
U ?' lU O O
E U U .
w
" -5 'O Ca m (6 (6
0 0) O O O O t=
U O
(6 t0
j E E 0)
E 0 N ?
>
> Q) 0)
> > > >
0)
a
T
Co
U
C
7
O
U
Cn
(1)
U_
O_
O
0
4)
6
W V) ?. VJ '1n i! h N Ln l!J V) lA M V Q CIQ '? V N N, NIF IN N N r r r 'r r 0 O.O N In SIN RIQ?V V

I - J3
w ?r
Irn r
lrn r
rn r
rn r
rn r
rn r
rn rr
rn rn rr
rn rn rrrr
rn m rnrn m r
m
I lr
rn' 'r''r r
rnlrn m ? r
m m r r r
rn rn,rn rr r
m rn rn r rI? r rI?
rn rnrn rnlrn:rn Ir??'r Ir
lrn I rn,rn m
--- -- -- -- -- -- w
co
_
W
J
ICI
--- --- - -- --- --- w
w
w m
I
___ __ _ _ _. _ __ __
W O? O> N
N N M N LL'1 rn O V N rn O r rn N O N

rn
'

rn

m

rn

rn

rn

m

rn

rn

rn

rn

m rnrn

rn

rn

rn

m

m

m

m
w
i

- E
m

i LL

m LL
K
I o ?,
w
L c N co
LL J
O
? U
o
m
c
r `m
m
s
o --
-
-?i'?
--
---
-- o 3
-
Z
LL d
-
(n L

r O O OO OI OIO OOO O, O iIO OIOIO OOiO OOO OO O O O O
- C O O O'p0 OI

- - - - -- - - - - - -
Q
m
O
O

' I'
+? -
--
W
O

O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
0
D
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0

N 0

?O 0

N O

?O O

!? O

O u)

R O

rn O

O C

N C

O O

7 0

O 0

? O

N O

u7 O

O O

N
C N O N r N
N r
N rn
N N
M O
M c0
M O (
O ?
M (
N O
O O
O O
r r
r O
c0 (O
W N
rn e0
rn O O N N N M V 7 M O O r r m N

y

C
°
19 C
O O
O O
O
O
O OIO

0

0

0

0 0 0

0 O O

u'i' O

O O O

O O O

O 0 O

O
_ J - _ _ - - _ - - _ _
N N
0 6ION M
N
v, v? B ?1 Q (O Q r M t0 (O tp C M r M N M V V r tO o? itJ M r th N u7 N
_ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _
N
O
m u
m
m r
m N
1
m m
6 m

c
a
W) uo genel3
N
m
m Q
rn
m
.-L-
Q m, L - M M
r lrn r r
rn ?-
.-.-L-
n r r rn
rn rn
.- ?
rn r m m
?
m m .-
?
rn
r
?
°n rn
o
m n
rn
rn
rn rn
m
Ml N
m
m
m N
m
rnrn rn N
mm
rnm rn m N
co
0, 0,
w
rn M
n
ro
rn N
n
D
rn M
n
O
rn M
n
rn
rn Q
n
D
rn M M
rn
O m
rn M
n
m N
n
m
rn M
n
rn
rn M
n
rn
rn M
n
o
rn N
r
o
rn
r
n
rn
r
o
rn
n
rn
rn
r
rn
rn r

rn r

rn r

rn n n

rn m r

rn rn
cq
rn
m rn
cq
rn
rn rn
co
o
m rn
co
o
rn Q
co

rn M
co
m
rn N
rn
rn
rn

I
I

M
N
rn
m M
M
rn
m Q r M
rn M M
rn rn rn
Irn1rn r M
N N
rn rn
m?rn r
N
rn
rn n
N

m N cp
N
rn
m M
V1
rn m
rn rn

m
m N N;N
rn
rn m rn
rn rn rn
O? N
N
mm Q

rn rn rn N
M Q (h
rn rn rn
rn rnrn N
C7

m r
r

m m N
rn
N
rn Y, I q
rn O O
m rn rn
rn rn rn rn N Q
?1J co rn
rn N N
rn rn N N
- N N N
rn (? rn
rn rn rn M

rn N N

rn rn N
rn
rn rn CO
m
rn N
rn rn N rn
O> 0 0
? (O t0
rn rn rn rn

(O
rn n n
N
(O (D
rn rn N r
th N
rn (O
rn rn rn
N
rn
rn Q M
M
rn rn
rn

I
I

i

to to

00 olo?o

000 o'0 0

010110 of oo

000 o?o0

000 0 0 0

01010 0 010

0100 0o0

0010 0 0
10
0100
oioo
0.00
0 0 0
01010
0 0110
0100
olio to
0 0
0
o1 oo
0
00
001010
00
0 010
'2 0
01010
0010
0 0
0101
I
o
O
rn C
N
rn O
O
0
N O
N
0
N O
Q
0
N O
N
O
N O
O

N O
I[1

N O
O
N
N O
y
N
N O
O
M
N O
N
M
N O
O
Q
N O
M
Q
N O
rn
Q
N O
n
Q
N O
0
N
N O
rn
N
N O
0
rn
N O
u'?
tD
N O
O
r
N O
rn
n
N O
0
ap
N 0
1?
(9
N 0
N
rn
N 0
rn
rn
N 0

0
M 0
?
0
M 0
m
0
M 0
N

M 0
Q

M 0
O
N
M 0
O
N
M 0
OJ
N
M 0
N
M
M 0
M
Q
M 0
W
Q
M 0
rn
Q
M 0
0
N
M 0
fV
N
M 0
c0
N
M 0
V
1p
M 0
rn
rn
M 0
(V
r
M 0
N
r
M 0
O
a0
M 0
Q
ap
M 0
OJ
W
M 0
(')
O?
M 0
tD
rn
M 0
M
O
Q 01
O

Q?
N NINN NN.N Ni NN NMM ?1MN NNN NNn N[OM MINIM NrnN Qrnm N?? Nrnrn NrnM NQQ NN?N r0
L - L
•
Appendix G. Jurisdictional Wetlands
U
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
i

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
• Action 1D. SAW-2006-40345-233 County: Edgecombe USGS Quad: Whitakers
GENERAL PERIMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
- Property Owner / Authorized Agent: KCI Technologies, Inc. attn: Steve Stokes
Address: Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
. Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone No.: 919 783-9214 x 187
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): 22.3 acres of agricultural land draining to
Swift Creek, Oust east of the intersection of SR1415 (Morningstar Church) and SR 1414 (Benson Farm), six miles
northeast of Rocky Mount, NC.
Description of projects area and activity: Fill approximately 0.24 acres (-3,485 linear feet by 3 foot wide) agricultural
drainage ditch bottoms to raise water table.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 27
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification is valid until the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified,
reissued, or revoked prior to March 18, 2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a
public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the
date that the relevant nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or
revocation of the NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit. If, prior to the
expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid
until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and conditions. The District
Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or revoke a case specific activity's authorization
under any NWP.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvalslpermits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Jamie Shem at 919 876-8441 x 31.
Corps Regulatory Official -A I dt-A QAL Date: 8/16/06
Expiration Date of Verification:
Page I of 1
SNOISIA3L
3M tG3T'tl "Ob Swlf x5 qOr
r uzire? nn?a.? ou aim VNIlOi1V0 H1NON 'AlNnoD 39WOJ3003 '1Nnow ), oo8
S15i001003•Sb#+bx ld•Stl33ni0b3 R F ZQ
103rONd NOII"OMS l E N a
N33NO i=ims Ol in- 1138UVH
0
N
O T
V U
g o
0 0
? ? x o
z
', ` ,•' \?? '?/i5`ffyfff/ff/f/f/fi?/fff}/ r
..........
'? ff
x i
S ?
m
`i
x
00 o \
?\ N
'\ O
C7
\? o
.1M3ry g? =b a
76
0
................
a
m
•
•
•
•
•
•
Appendix H. Wetland Water Budget
Harrell Farm - Existina Conditions
D Year Water Inputs Water Outputs Change in Excess Wetland
1988 P Si' Gi PET So Go Loss to Ditches Storage Water Volume
January 3.55 0.28 0.00 0.10 0.28 1.04 0.26 2.15 0.00 2.15
February 2.10 0.04 0.00 0.51 0.04 1.04 0.26 0.29 0.00 2.44
March 2.59 0.03 0.00 1.18 0.03 1.04 0.26 0.11 0.00 2.55
April 2.20 0.05 0.00 2.31 0.05 1.04 0.26 -1.41 0.00 1.14
May 3.64 0.31 0.00 3.84 0.31 1.04 0.26 -1.50 0.00 0.00
June 3.25 0.15 0.00 5.25 0.15 1.04 0.26 -3.30 0.00 0 00
July 2.24 0.07 0.00 6.44 0.07 1.04 0.26 -5.50 0.00 0.00
August 4.26 0.64 0.00 6.18 0.64 1.04 0.26 -3.22 0.00 0.00
September 2.40 0.04 0.00 3.97 0.04 1.04 0.26 -2.87 0.00 0.00
October 2.92 0.30 0.00 1.57 0.30 1.04 0.26 0.05 0.00 0.05
November 2.48 0.10 0.00 1.08 0.10 1.04 0.26 0.10 0.00 0.16
December 0 58 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 1.04 0.26 0.09 0.00 0.25
Annual Totals
Avg. Year Water Inputs Water Outputs Change in Excess Wetland
1977 P Si' Gi PET So Go Loss to Ditches Storage Water Volume
January 3.95 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.72 1.04 0.54 2.37 0.00 2.37
February 2.02 0.06 0.00 0.34 0.06 1.04 0.54 0.10 0.00 2.47
March 4.83 0.23 0.00 1.51 0.23 1.04 0.54 1.74 0.00 4.20
April 2.04 0.14 0.00 2.80 0.14 1.04 0.54 -2.34 0.00 1.87
May 5.94 2.70 0.00 4.08 2.70 1.04 0.54 0.28 0.00 2.15
June 2.89 0.04 0.00 4.96 0.04 1.04 0.54 -3.65 0.00 0.00
July 1.70 0.01 0.00 6.80 0.01 1.04 0.54 -6.68 0.00 0.00
August 5.39 0.82 0.00 5.96 0.82 1.04 0.54 -2.15 0.00 0.00
September 3.73 1.63 0.00 4.58 1.63 1.04 0.54 -2.43 0.00 0.00
October 4.43 0.34 0.00 1.98 0.34 1.04 0.54 0.87 0.00 0.87
November 4.06 1.28 0.00 1.33 1.28 1.04 0.54 1.15 0.00 2.02
December 4.06 0.29 0.00 0.38 0.29 104 0.54 3.14 0.00 4.68
Annual Totals
Wet Year Water Inputs Water Outputs Change in Excess Wetland
1989 P Si' Gi PET So Go Loss to Ditches Storage Water Volume
January 2.49 0.02 0.00 0.48 0.02 1.04 0.98 -0.01 0.00 0.00
February 5.70 0.52 0.00 0.42 0.52 1.04 0.98 3.26 0.00 3.26
March 625 0.48 0.00 1.08 0.48 1.04 0.98 3.15 1.01 4.68
April 7.74 1.18 0.00 2.11 1.18 1.04 0.98 3.61 2.89 4.68
May 5.72 0 49 0.00 3.47 0.49 1.04 0.98 0.23 0.00 4.68
June 8.36 1.17 0.00 6.16 1.17 1.04 0.98 0.18 0.00 4 68
July 5.16 135 0.00 6.29 1.35 1.04 0.98 -3.15 0.00 1.53
August 7.58 1.30 0.00 5.45 130 1.04 0.98 0.11 0.00 1.64
September 2.89 0.06 0.00 4.16 0.06 1.04 0.98 -3.29 0.00 0.00
October 4.47 0.75 0.00 2.14 0.75 1.04 0.98 0.31 0.00 0.31
November 2.90 0.19 0.00 1.03 0.19 1.04 0.98 0.15 0.00 0.16
December 3.56 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.04 0.98 2.58 0.00 2.74
Annual Totals 62 82 1 19 0.00 32.80 7.79 0 00 1 1.'6

c
c
o
j

0
o
U a)
W
W
X -
co O y N ?

Z
C U
c
C ?
c N

}

m
?
r
o
((DDm
moo
>
vU ?m cm a

I I
f
z
N
C
r O
d ra 0 m
MIS E
0
0z
m V 0
L
0 N
N
W ?
(D

¦ o

I ?
a?

C
L ¦
i
U
E o i
M c
E :3
O
I
=3
N (D
I T
@ 7
N P

+ ? Cn
co C
D
I ?

U -'
co

I
All I
a

i ?

\ 1

L.L

L co N O
(sayoui) ewnIOA J818M puel;aM
Harrell Farm - Proposed Conditions
D Year Water Inputs Water Outputs Change in Excess Wetland
1988 P Si' Gi PET So Go Loss to Ditches Storage Water Volume
January 155 0.28 0.00 0.10 0.00 1.04 0.00 2.69 0.00 2.69
February 2.10 0.04 100 0.51 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.59 0.00 3 28
March 2.59 0.03 0 00 1.18 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.39 0 00 3 67
April 2.20 0.05 0.00 2.31 0.00 1.04 0.00 -1.10 0.00 2.58
May 3.64 0.31 0.00 3.84 0.00 1.04 0.00 -0.94 0.00 1.64
June 3.25 0.15 0.00 5.25 0.00 1.04 0.00 -2.89 0.00 0.00
July 2.24 0.07 0.00 6.44 0.00 1.04 0.00 -5.18 0.00 0.00
August 4.26 0.64 0.00 6.18 0.00 1.04 0.00 -2.32 0 00 0.00
September 2.40 0.04 C.00 3.97 0.00 1.04 0.00 -2.57 0.00 0.00
October 2.92 0.30 C.00 1.57 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.62
November 2.48 0.10 C.00 1.08 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.46 0.00 1.08
December 0,58 1 0.00 C.00 0.23 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.35 0.00 1.43
Annual Total
Avg. Year Water Inputs Water Out UtS Change in Excess Wetland
1977 P Si' Gi PET So Go Loss to Ditches Storage Water Volume
January 3.95 0.72 0 00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 3.63 0.00 3.63
February 2.02 0.06 0 00 0.34 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.70 0.00 4.34
March 4.83 0.23 0 00 1.51 0.00 1.04 0.00 2.51 0.00 4.68
April 2.04 0.14 0 00 2.80 0.00 1.04 0.00 -1.65 0.00 3.03
May 5.94 2.70 0 00 4.08 0.00 1.04 0.00 3.52 0.00 4.68
June 2.89 0.04 0.00 4.96 0.00 1.04 0.00 -3.07 0.00 161
July 1.70 0.01 0.00 6.80 0.00 1.04 0.00 -6.13 0.00 0.00
August 5.39 0.82 0 00 5.96 0.00 1.04 0.00 -0.78 0.00 0.00
September 3.73 1.63 0.00 4.58 0.00 1.04 0.00 -0.27 0.00 0.00
October 4.43 0.34 0.00 198 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.75 0.00 1.75
November 4.06 1 0.00 1.33 0.00 1.04 0.00 2.96 0.00 4.68
December 4 06 029 C JO 0.38 000 1 1.04 0.00 3.98 0.86 4.68
Annual Total
Wet Year Water Inputs Water Out UtS Change in Excess Wetland
1989 P Si' Gi PET So Go Loss to Ditches Storage Water Volume
January 2.49 0.02 0.00 0.48 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.98
February 5.70 0.52 0.00 0.42 0.00 1.04 0.00 4.76 0.00 4.68
March 625 0.48 0.00 1.08 0.00 1.04 0.00 4.61 1.49 4.68
April 7.74 1.18 0.00 2.11 0.00 1.04 0.00 5.78 2.66 4.68
May 5.72 0.49 0.00 3.47 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.70 0.00 4.68
June 8.36 1.17 0.00 6.16 0.00 1.04 0.00 2.33 0.00 4.68
July 5.16 1.35 0.00 6.29 0.00 1.04 0.00 -0.83 0.00 3.85
August 7.58 1.30 0.00 5.45 0.00 1.04 0.00 2.39 0.00 4.68
September 2.89 0.06 0.00 4.16 0.00 1.04 0.00 -2.25 0.00 2.43
October 4.47 0.75 0.00 2.14 0.00 104 0.00 2.04 0.00 4.47
November 2.90 0.19 0.00 1.03 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.02 0.00 4.68
December 3.56 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 3.84 0.72 4.68
Annual Total 62.82 7 79 0 01 32.80 0 00 0 Oil 0 00
E g o

X
y co
co .... 0)
CC)
_
m '
o 3 v
CV rn
w
c '? Z
c _0 I m N
m m
c°OOm boo a?
v U m rn Q
i I
_ _C
0
m U
L
O
L
a

T
I
i
I '
I
I
I
ll
a
J
CL
N
(A
7
Q
T
7
S
T
a
i
L
a
U
L
0
7
(D LO - M N O
(sayaui) ownlOA JOIBM puBROM