20141149 Ver 8_Monitoring Report 2020 (Draft)_20201119

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20141149 Version*8
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/19/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/19/2020
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands 17 Buffer IZ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20141149 Version:*8
Existing I[# Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS C' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Rocky Top
County: Alamance
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: 2014-1149-V8 Draft Rocky Top
15.07MB
Buffer_2020MY3_.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

YEAR 3 (2020)
MONITORING REPORT
Rocky Top Bank Parcel
DWR#20141149 version 8
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems'Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits
f, K;
,If
�v.
r" yk
y p
1• '1�' - y yx4 .�
pM *t; •
t ,rY�� r w4wid 7
44
� e
4k� S �e �
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS,LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET,SUITE 211
RESTORATION RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27604
SYSTEMS I LLC
AND
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27603
Axiom Environmental,Inc.
November 2020

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems,LLC(RS)has established the Rocky Top Bank Parcel(Parcel),proposed as part of
the Restoration Systems' Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument (Banking Instrument)
signed October 25th, 2017 between Restoration Systems and the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources(DWR).Per the Jordan Lake Water supply Nutrient Strategy,Consolidated Mitigation Rule,and
Nutrient Offset Payments (15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, 15A NCAC 02B .0295, & 15A
NCAC 02B .0240), this Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits
for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake in the
Cape Fear River Basin. Supporting figures are included in Appendix B.
The Parcel was evaluated on December 19th,2014,by Virginia Baker of DWR. Ms.Baker's evaluation was
part of an inter-agency review, including the US Army Corps of Engineers,to determine if stream features
located within the Site are applicable to provide compensatory stream mitigation under Restoration
Systems' Cape Fear 02 Phase One Umbrella Banking Instrument (Rocky Top USACE Action ID SAW-
2015-01710). Riparian areas adjacent to features providing compensatory mitigation for stream impacts
were restored and provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit.
The Parcel was planned and designed according to the Banking Instrument with DWR, 15A NCAC 02B
.0240, and the Consolidated Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295,which became effective on November
1st, 2015. The Parcel was designed in concurrence with the Rocky Top Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank(SAW#2015-01710). The mitigation plan for the Rocky Top Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank,
along with the Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, was approved by the
Interagency Review Team on July 6th,2017. The Section 404 permit(Clean Water Act,33 USC 1344)was
granted by the US Army Corps of Engineers on June 30th, 2017, the corresponding Section 401 Water
Quality Certification was granted on June 28th, 2017, and the land quality letter of approval was granted
June 20th,2017.
Project construction and planting were completed between October 16th and December 19th, 2017.
Baseline monitoring data was collected between mid-and late March 2018. For the Rocky Top Nutrient
Offset and Riparian Buffer Bank purposes,the Parcel involved restoring riparian buffers and other riparian
areas adjacent to mitigated streams to reduce non-point source contaminant discharges to downstream
waters in the Haw River sub-watershed of Jordan Lake. All riparian areas were assessed by DWR during
an onsite visit to determine viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset. During the June 13th, 2017
site visit, all riparian areas were confirmed to have been in pasture for cattle grazing. Approximately 5.16
acres will be protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of those 5.16 acres, 2.35 acres were
restored for Jordan riparian buffer credit, 1.09 acres were restored for nutrient offset credit, and 0.94 acres
were enhanced by removing cattle from streams and riparian areas for Jordan riparian buffer credit.
In general, riparian restoration/enhancement area widths on streams extend out to a maximum of 200 feet
from the top of stream banks (TOB)with a minimum of 20 feet from TOB. Riparian buffer enhancement
credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)but cannot be
used to generate nutrient offset credits. Additionally,no riparian restoration areas that are less than 50 feet
wide from TOB can be used to generate nutrient offset credit. No riparian restoration areas that are less
than 20 feet wide from TOB can be used to generate riparian buffer credit.Therefore,the maximum acreage
of riparian restoration on this Site that can be converted into nutrient offset credits,if needed by RS,is 2.32
acres.Figure 3(Appendix B)shows the Credit Determination Map,and Section 2.0 details the Bank Parcel's
mitigation determination.
Year 3 (2020)vegetation sampling occurred on September 16th,2020. Stem density across the Parcel was
above the required average density, with 344 planted tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving
in year 3 (2020). In addition, two of four individual vegetation plots met success criteria based on planted
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page i
Phase One Flaw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

stems alone. Plots 2 and 3 were only one and two stems shy of meeting success criteria, respectively. It is
expected that natural recruits will help increase the density of these plots during subsequent monitoring
years. Additionally,two 50m x 2m vegetation transects in the vicinity of plots 2 and 3 were measured, and
both exceeded success criteria with 405 and 445 stems per acre, respectively. Lower stem survival within
plots 2 and 3 can be attributed to several factors,most notably poor soil conditions,and extremely vigorous
herbaceous competition.
After observing the Site for the Year 3 growing season, routine vegetation management activities will be
implemented following Section 4.2(Parcel Maintenance)of the Bank Parcel Development Plan to facilitate
continued success. These activities will include mechanical and chemical control of competing herbaceous
vegetation in targeted areas beginning early in the 4th year (2021). In intensive treatment areas, a short-
term nurse-crop seed mix may be planted to suppress weedy herbaceous competition. These management
activities will ensure the continued survival of the planted stems and the establishment of natural recruits.
RS conducted a Site review of the project on 10/27/20 with USACE representative Sam Dailey, DWR
representative Erin Davis, and Wildlife Resource Commission (WRC) representative Travis Wilson.
Regarding vegetation, DWR was okay with supplemental planting within plots and surrounding areas of
low density/vigor as long as the action is noted in the monitoring report. DWR requested that for all
supplemental planting efforts species and approximate locations and quantities planted should be noted.
2019 Maintenance Summary;
Three herbicide applications were performed during the 2019 growing season targeting Japanese
Stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum). Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua)was a secondary target
species, and were hand treated around Veg Plot 2. Further detail about the herbicide application is
summarized in Table 7 of Appendix C.
2020 Maintenance Summary;
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
May 5th,2020 and September 17th,2020 September 16th,2020-Rock was added to a
marsh treatment area to prevent head-cutting
Japanese Stiltgrass,Sweetgum,Cattail,Veg after a storm event.The area was also re-
within UT-2 seeded.
After observing the Site during the monitoring year and re-visiting the areas that did not meet Yr. 3
(2020) success criteria, RS believes vegetation at the Site performs significantly better than what is
shown from the permanent vegetation monitoring plots. This was observed by IRT members during
their site visit for the 404/401 mitigation. During that site visit, all parties agreed that containerized
trees should and would be planted in low-density areas with thick fescue coverage. Planting in
monitoring plots was determined to be okay if noted in the 2021 monitoring report.
RS is working on a planting plan, including species type, quantity, and location. Before any replant
activity occurs,RS will work with DWR staff on approving the additional planting.
General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 3
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity(i.e.,beaver,heavy deer browsing, etc.)was observed.
• 09-2020 drone video: https://youtu.be/VCmY7peZz10
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page ii
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 PROJECT GOALS,BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES 1
1.1 Location and Setting 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL 1
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 3
3.1 Monitoring Protocol 3
3.2 Parcel Maintenance 4
4.0 REFERENCES 5
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Appendix B. Figures
Figure 1. Site Location& Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Close-up of Restoration Buffer Width TOB-29 Feet
Figure 5. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Appendix C.Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix D. Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Appendix E. Vegetation Monitoring Datasheets
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Table of Contents page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

1.0 PROJECT GOALS,BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) established the Rocky Top Bank Parcel (Parcel), as part of the RS'Phase
One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument(Banking Instrument)signed October 25th,2017 between
RS, and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The Parcel encompasses 5.16 acres of land located 2600 feet northeast of Major Hill Road and Holman
Mill Road. Before construction, the Parcel was characterized by disturbed forest, hayfields, and livestock
pasture.Forested areas of the Site were accessible to livestock resulting in a thin understory with compacted
soils. Located in the South Atlantic/Gulf Region approximately 6 miles southwest of Saxapahaw and 2
miles east of Snow Camp in Alamance County(Figure 1,Appendix B),the Parcel is hydrologically situated
within the USGS 14-digit HUC and Targeted Local Watershed 03030002050050 of the Cape Fear River
Basin and Jordan Lake's Haw Sub-Watershed (DWR Subbasin Number 03-06-02). The main hydrologic
features include two unnamed tributaries(UT)to Reedy Branch and adjacent floodplains.
Directions to the Site from Snow Camp are as follows.
• Take E. Greensboro Chapel Hill Rd. east— 1.5 miles
• Turn right on Holman Mill Rd.— 1.4 miles
• The Site is on the left.
• Access Site at the gate located 0.5 miles down Major Hill Rd.
• Landowner permission required to access Site.
o Site Coordinates: 35.886642, -79.388262
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
According to the Final Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities(NCEEP 2009),this watershed should
be targeted for restoration to protect the nutrient-sensitive waters that ultimately drain into the nutrient-
sensitive water supply of Jordan Lake. Overall, the purpose of the Rocky Top Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Bank was to restore, enhance, and preserve riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated
streams onsite. The riparian restoration and enhancement will result in improved water quality within the
Parcel and the downstream watershed.The Parcel is located in a region of the state dominated by agriculture
and livestock; restoration of the riparian buffer is expected to result in immediate water quality benefits
within the vicinity of the Parcel through the removal of livestock access to Parcel streams.
Primary goals focus on 1) improving water quality, 2) enhancing flood attenuation and hydrology, 3)
improving aquatic resources, and 4) restoring riparian habitat. Mitigation activities provide floodplain
connectivity/resistance,stream stability,sediment transport,surface/subsurface storage/retention,in-stream
habitat, riparian habitat/structure, thermal regulation, floodplain biogeochemical processing, pollutant
filtration, and pollutant source removal.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The Rocky Top Bank Parcel provides Jordan buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits for development
impacts within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake.The width of the credit generation area begins
at the most landward limit of the TOB or the rooted herbaceous vegetation and extends landward a
maximum distance of 200 feet where applicable. A maximum of 2.32 acres of riparian restoration on this
Site can be converted and transferred from Riparian Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset Credits and from
Nutrient Offset Credit back to Riparian Buffer Credits upon approval and does not include any of the
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 1
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

acreage being mitigated to generate wetland mitigation credit. The Sponsor must submit a written request
and receive written approval from DWR before any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer and
nutrient credit ledgers. All delivery factors shall be applied to nutrient offset credits before requesting a
conversion.
According to the nutrient reduction goals for the Haw River arm of Jordan Lake, the generated nitrogen
credits per acre in the Haw Sub-watershed for riparian restoration on agricultural land is 2249.36 pounds,
and the generated phosphorus credit per acre is 143.81 pounds. The delivery factors applied to this Parcel
are 71 percent for nitrogen and 67 percent for phosphorus (Appendix D). Delivered credits are calculated
by applying the delivery factors and the acreage of riparian restoration to the generated credits per acre
stated above. Based on the asbuilt report, Jordan riparian buffer and nutrient offset (Nitrogen and
Phosphorus) credits for the Rocky Top Bank Parcel are summarized in Table 1 and corresponding Figures
3-4 (Appendix B).
The Sponsor will maintain four credit ledgers for the Parcel under the Banking Instrument and BPDP: (1)
for buffer restoration mitigation credits in both square feet and acres,(1)for buffer enhancement mitigation
credits in square feet and acres, (1) accounting for nitrogen offset credits in pounds and acres, and (1)
accounting for phosphorus offset credits in pounds and acres.
The Sponsor may elect to use riparian areas for either buffer mitigation credit or wetland mitigation credit,
but not both. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR before
any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer credit ledger. As part of that request, the Sponsor must
provide DWR with a written acceptance letter from the USACE, accompanied by supporting documents,
for any wetlands that they want to be removed from the wetland mitigation bank. Only riparian areas that
fail to qualify to generate wetland credit may be viable for generating riparian buffer credit. Figure 3
(Appendix B)depicts riparian areas that could generate riparian buffer credit if they don't qualify to generate
wetland mitigation credits. Figure 4 (Appendix B) represents the potential conversion of failed wetland
mitigation credits to riparian buffer credits. Any areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must meet the
performance standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Space Purposefully Left Blank
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 2
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table
14 Digit Watershed ID: 03030002050050
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits
*Buffer Width Mitigation Percentage of Full
from TOB Credit Type Total Area Ratio Credit Mitigation Credits
TOB-29 ft 152.83 ft2 1:1 75% 114.62 ft2
(0.003 ac) (0.002 ac)
Restoration
102,356.48 ft2 102,356.48 ft2
TOB-100 ft (2.35 ac) 1:1 100% (2.35 ac)
TOB-29 ft 54.43 ft2 20.41 ft2
2:1 75%
Enhancement (0.001 ac) (0.0004 ac)
via Cattle 40 784.55 ft2 20 392.28 ft2
TOB-100 ft Exclusion(15A (0.94 ac) 2:1 100% (0.47 ac)
NCAC 02B
101-200 ft .0295(o)(6) 113.87 ft2 2:1 33% 18.79 ft2
(0.003 ac) (0.0005 ac)
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits 122,902.58 ft2
(2.82 ac)
Nutrient Offset Credits
**Buffer Width Credit Mitigation Total Generated Generated Delivery Delivered
from TOB Type Type Acreage Credits per Credits Factor Credits
Acre
101-200 ft Nitrogen Restoration 1.09 2249.36 2451.80 71% 1740.78
101-200 ft Phosphorus Restoration 1.09 143.81 156.75 67% 105.02
*TOB-20 ft=Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for no credit.
TOB-29 ft=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 75%credit.
TOB-100 ft=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 100%credit.
101-200'=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 33%credit.
**Buffer mitigation credits are sought from TOB to 100 feet.Beyond buffer credit generating areas,RS is proposing
nutrient offset credits out to a maximum of 200 feet for a contiguous riparian restoration from TOB to 200 feet where
possible.
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
3.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual
plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed
as outlined in CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2(Lee et al. 2008). Photos will
be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All planted stems
in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.Detailed qualitative and quantitative monitoring
is proposed for vegetated riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected periodically and
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 3
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report as required. Reporting will include a photographic
record of the Parcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Each monitoring year, RS shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR no later than December 31 st.
Quantitative monitoring includes measurements of 4-1Ox10 meter, permanent vegetation plots (3.2% of
restoration and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted riparian
areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be performed in the Fall
of each year; monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.
During the first year, planted vegetation received a cursory visual evaluation to ascertain the degree of
overtopping of planted trees by nuisance species. Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient
offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre
after five years of monitoring.A minimum of four native hardwood tree and shrub species must be present,
with no one species representing greater than 50%of the stems. In addition,appropriate volunteer stems of
native hardwood tree and shrub species may be included to meet the final performance standard of 260
stems per acre upon DWR approval.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion and preservation areas within the conservation easement will
also be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the Site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting,clearing,filling,grading,or similar activities that would negatively
affect the function of the restored buffer.
3.2 Parcel Maintenance
After observing the Site for the Year 3 growing season, routine vegetation management activities will be
implemented following Section 4.2(Parcel Maintenance)of the Bank Parcel Development Plan to facilitate
continued success. These activities will include mechanical and chemical control of competing herbaceous
vegetation in targeted areas beginning early in the 4th year (2021). In intensive treatment areas, a short-
term nurse-crop seed mix may be planted to suppress weedy herbaceous competition. These management
activities will ensure the continued survival of the planted stems and the establishment of natural recruits.
RS conducted a Site review of the project on 10/27/20 with USACE representative Sam Dailey, DWR
representative Erin Davis, and Wildlife Resource Commission (WRC) representative Travis Wilson.
Regarding vegetation, DWR was okay with supplemental planting within plots and surrounding areas of
low density/vigor as long as the action is noted in the monitoring report. DWR requested that for all
supplemental planting efforts species and approximate locations and quantities planted should be noted.
2019 Maintenance Summary;
Three herbicide applications were performed during the 2019 growing season targeting Japanese
Stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum). Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua)was a secondary target
species, and were hand treated around Veg Plot 2. Further detail about the herbicide application is
summarized in Table 7 of Appendix C.
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 4
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

2020 Maintenance Summary;
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
May 5th,2020 and September 17th,2020 September 16th,2020-Rock was added to a
marsh treatment area to prevent head-cutting
Japanese Stiltgrass,Sweetgum,Cattail,Veg after a storm event.The area was also re-
within UT-2 seeded.
After observing the Site during the monitoring year and re-visiting the areas that did not meet Yr. 3
(2020) success criteria, RS believes vegetation at the Site performs significantly better than what is
shown from the permanent vegetation monitoring plots. This was observed by IRT members during
their site visit for the 404/401 mitigation. During that site visit, all parties agreed that containerized
trees should and would be planted in low-density areas with thick fescue coverage. Planting in
monitoring plots was determined to be okay if noted in the 2021 monitoring report.
RS is working on a planting plan, including species type, quantity, and location. Before any replant
activity occurs,RS will work with DWR staff on approving the additional planting.
4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., JM Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson,
J.B. Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US
Geological Survey,Reston,Virginia.
Jordan Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, and
15A NCAC 02B .0295
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level 1-2 Plot Version 4.2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality
Plan. Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=2eddbd59-b382-4b58-
97ed-c4049bf4e8e4&groupld=38364. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources,Raleigh,North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online).Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=
864e82e8-725c-415 e-8ed9-c72dfcb55012&groupId=60329
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation.North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,Division of Parks and Recreation,
NC Department of Environment,Health, and Natural Resources.Raleigh,North Carolina.
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 5
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix A.
Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity/Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA November 14th,2017
Parcel Protection via conservation easement NA October 17th,2014
Easement Assignment to Land Trust NA August 17th,2017
Cattle exclusion/fence construction NA April 2015
Planting NA March 2018
As-Built Data Collection NA March 5th—23rd 2018
Asbuilt Report Submittal NA July 2018
Year 1 (2018)Monitoring October 2018 December 2018
Year 2(2019)Monitoring October 2019 December 2019
Year 3 (2020)Monitoring October 2020 November 2020
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
IFirm 11111=1 POC&Address
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Bank Sponsor Restoration Systems,LLC Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer: Axiom Environmental,Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC 27603
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Construction Contractor: Strader Fencing Inc 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring,NC 27592-7756
Mary-Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
Planting Contractor: Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton,NC 27932
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Seeding Contractor: Land Mechanics,Inc. 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring,NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection& Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental,Inc. 218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC 27603
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes Table
Project Information I -
Project Name Rocky Top
County Alamance
Project Area(acres) 5.16
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) Latitude: 35°53'12.1"N,Longitude: 79°23'16.1"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030002 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030002050050
DWQ Sub-basin 03-06-02
Project Drainage Area,Total Outfall(miles) 0.07 mi2
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area < 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification Pasture and Forest Land
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix B.
Figures
Figure 1. Site Location& Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Close-up of Restoration Buffer Width TOB-29 Feet
Figure 5. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

vBle
�•�_ --. —�r �Wenhvorth _ r
--.� Core,,1 tf .15a 12... pgj'I cis? ROkDoro
•
•1 • •Rom • 'elds4llle qt W r. - /.
rSa
Pmey ili . l_ , , YlitAit .' •
4,
6lcuntain - r ....„,.. . . , . .. . - - _
Aii*a
•
,,.
yPine Hall f 4 \ ` `� c=u " Y „(
IWa leer Cove...-. • d ' �" ..- 4(
+, 1 /• .i
a � Pa ape co Axl m Er vpo►rinMrMal,Mc.
,F _ RA�Ir. TImOHraM.�
•
•
Hurdle Yills
e. h [ s Sony ... L�� 1 4..: Prepared for:
Beleyws Creeks -_ _ Creek Prospect Hirt
.---',a - smke .Ir ldarint8ln 41i,
' r. -+,
Npr �y �c �' �.. � ia I
NIIISl1![ 11)l. IM
�7�.i�r ?H�pfa?: , 1 1' 9u',tail 17•
{{I .t.. � n Rargemn!
.S! Y n,nieriirld E:e�r�•n•,'ummr V
1 .:- .. 1414 '. r
m. 1 Wa1knA.mr :�' _ x 'A - LLa -``+
k Ridge • +'Fm. .- :�31a :fraf :'
ililk• RESTORATION
C.dar Grova
r - �-- �� - - / Bahama 'L
~ l .. •M��:•
. SYSTEMS I LLC
. L'c_ ' e�iev. L: Orange;. l
{''' 1
r �. ' t
1111.111110were _ -- _ ti.r..n�wn .� _ r Project:
.r► � met taro, ` T ,� r ( ..k/
y Inge•.2'�.�a: rville Di6son,:':e17 J- C y
Burl n,: Mete, r4.1,10
�' ROCKY TOP
+w H •rg` �n: 5 BANK PARCEL
Greerr• n l•,fliilsrn / Nillsborough
"� Sedalia �fr7lilfA ❑CCU PDSir'CC •
jr, _
I -- -- a I
!oa^�sn.� .:;�i:Hai :±. f 40011A1 = dit
} i = Alamance County, NC
14-Si �l Title:
10,:
.� : 111
.� Ja esrl e f ••Burnam SITE LOCATION
�` '�� -
y IP gFB1 ". . A N D
��lli 101
2j, .• °..,rn- SERVICE AREA
^ _ I •Ienyant Garcen - - .. .cunt ul ... T�� ,
� -� rrIll.:'�. �+� .di r - - Cane�., ��
• I
w 1":41.c, s, a W ha..
'' ` � • I ^ Notes:
...' �656 � •
.'��! _ ,. ' lion - _- { 4 1\ —
J ca L 1.Background Imagery Source:
LmFa T" L �aE _ sr,wcamn DeLorme World Besemap
7hwna,.ill. -$ •. _ 2208 C .0' .Relw••pyrha
•
N
per«
sf
1 �I ,-0
r• 30. 'mph �^ Bank Parcel Location "'"
•--- ,,. t •
{ 11 �, USGS 14-digit HUC
741, . , 03030002050050itt,,_
car. r1
•ter / - ►•:- -
L iTh r!!'It�at Gheprterd lid - _ '• ..
f 1157 Major Hill Road I~ rl�'�
. NounRlYl You �: �... - ,.i..:: .
�— §s M �� I Snow Camp, NC 27349 .. iK ,! ): Drawn by: KRJ
f ., ,
I � 8perr Lreel. __ .- - - _ � ...Y
'Mnurltpin• —=„ice_=- .; _��� Date: SEPT 2016
r 35.886591°N, 79.387578°W C=. k C �. -- Mountain dpi. hluslmrn M ° Scale: 1:3500
llik
en^heboro rs;l.rci iopsl •
• I • Y Project No.: 16-017
Legend • i D.
ii Y, d- wHill
Jordan Lake 14-digit USGS HUCs ,,_.
Mwtnte{� r --'-' 14 . ^ •.,_7\---e\---1,S-J.Kv...„._1... -\‘''''''''::\„___ it ,.
Springs FIGURE
Parcel Service Area- Haw River Subwatershed . ®�. •. :..
Bnnlee r` \` v
' Haw River Subwatershed .' r�• ..
./ „.1, 'Ip6 �, e..r.
New Hope Creek Subwatershed `[}l " .. •
��tan x6.;iSnO� 1
f 1 a�i' -�, R Div Fuawr-cameo*•
-
- 0 5 10 20 30 40 -m S, '�4 . r � - 3
Miles a `
"' Copyright:©2014 DeLorme

r ti .n:
•
arrsr 1
iii$1111k
.'* fi,,
;. Aram Envrronmenial,Inc.
'A Prepared for:
•
. . . . , s t ry Rs
....
.. . . . % r ' �. �:..
r .e:,• r1.:
d .. • }•
. .lam. .� 1 {.
•
r•: i n^y ti• H RESTORATION
• �� `% SYSTEMS LLC
.. •Y� r • .r• •' r:. _ _ +�_.i ;,r' w i4•.!. ..- � y c* 'n r' .a W�{ ii41•11'
� '� .f F Project:
•
r• •.r;'," . • - `�•
Y , '- 't'r' i.� ` ''L' ROCKY TOP
�' Ys, ,° •.,.,~ "�_ "� r:` _ w,° �. r' , : ,. V. �_ BANK
., • •
3�; .�.>- ' •�'' i�:1 �,. 'F 1 • 5 ' �' r. , PARCEL
ri
• I. + r- •W•'�.• `` - •Y � i J�- .\` 7 �f•" } _,'r ='��•�'. y ';• '• S} �I } r.
.� �;. • •`. '}.,� ' .� :! ;:r" bp Alamance County, NC
a' -1- y 5 ' i '•• ' 'r $ 0_.- •'•.."'_.' '" . .t. •5{ • 'Sj 4 4 r,Pir' 1 F II tt rt -?.s.r. "Pi.' J .rY A'1'• f•-^ Title:
�j •
,^+t r • ,5,44;J {y i - Fo' i'YL 4., :f,• i ite-' ',K -} - r '` =. - .r 1.'' 1r; .�I ".'i i
•
a. y' +''i'�� ' 'k N. .n;.'�` ram;+,�.... , �^ . - n f.-.... • 1
,r.:--re r' -r� °;a -r "- ' _ --•;� ' '• '"` _,;,;.• r}.'-• �• ;.r ' ,•' 7,� r .; C CURRENT
n; I.. .. '� fir:•, �' •`J. Y •�. y.. p.,,.. .,�. .•^f• ••._ �. • -..r, r • ..,-.- •:, ti '�s. •11' �;_ ,. ---,.,� f n . CONDITIONS
,_rwb :" •.., .:t, • F.RR'•rib • .f- r`��.r`n }-.: ..e'r� T .• •
�+� .�'+t. �t-r'' 1j�:. -
p} �, -, _• - AL r ;~ • a � PLAN VIEW
a i, 't•' .• . •• . r,., . •., tir. . ., , Ut•r4" •'AM• .d a.:e •.• 1.- • ' ''....!;-• 11-:' ' : ' ...:'....:-.07:;::::'''>':::'.ft.• a. oi-•-':'=, ''-''''','-iVit'. : ,k ..4.,, '• -"-- 'rq. ' i+
•
r � v 'f _ ,A! ' "••_`�.i • ,: .�.., • .� r .-5•Al t4 r.•�, 7Ajt..SI p` , ,i' • yyii ,, .�..f yY �.,
•
� �' . '�it.. ..- i t i..� , _"r. 1, •� { v, 't.• 'Y ` .. � : a i;�'�rr. Drawn by:
=t.t • y ' • 'y`� 7t •CIF- ~^ .- , . �.:t • •,,' `r ` r t ': r` y KRJ/CLF
7 , } ry. .. P. !' ,•` , -.' �►t!1 '�' ft . . :k�*+ F e'�w •• Date:
�r4 3
f 4$
rr ._.p!l,F y.. rR ,,;'_'•,'' . • i .tom• i,! r r �4i` ;,E r• •; x 'f OCT 2020
�. .. 1 Yr FF 7 • ' '� lam: "+ f* �:• )Y, v Scale:
,i 'r-+ 1 �r '.:I!'
sf'.'�IrJ .'qy.. ,,. ; + L" r,•• J' •`'„ Y 5� 1„i.." J,•S ;'`.• �.• �'. .
, •. p y' � "'. �.� r. 41'�,t' A'`•' ir" •
`�i. % T•1 k� 'i ,!' ^
i .IY •r:' '� •s w •.a 1 .",,, •{n P. y .,: '• % l �-k� yi. L.. ,15. ..{jyY - .s r Project No.:
-F ,.n � { '�i. .l';A•' - i T" .A .� 1 .5• 'i�: l ,' '' l.." % ` ` `Ir •
•
16-017
.r4 Yt� •.f_, • r• r"s.. I•k, •'•_• r}� '' • �,.•1. i ! • • :4 K '•L
Legend •
;`r • , • • P sr,A1• w _�'"� `w+ ,�9' : �' �,J' t'' .5.
r
•
= Rocky Top Easement=5.2 ac ;• ] 6',.-,_.�„ '. ;,:,i, •.1. r. '. r„ . � ,.r } . ,� q - '
r. ' -;:, >; . .., �. _ 4,'1', ,,, e. 4 or.i .1. _ -6,a i'� •r FIGURE
Stream Channel(Design) • .� r l.t, •; i 1+ .YT-•:;{ R I.. 1 ,r i ," ,.' v.' t ' r -';' r y , << e'!:..k.. .. 3. i ,
CVS Plots l' '.,i.',r .04f ,... . .'.� •.',.. , ".,. i1.i .F--i •s)- FiF l'' .. �} .e ,,.. •" ►Y • 41 '.�''.. : ,1. .
1.
• 50m x 2m Vegetation Transects °., ).,4i, .•' ,1 f .-,s' +ti ,,► • �s - , t. • ,It r
4' '` • �'; 2
; .1. 1 f ••P .r 4� '4 v..•.. .J i, ;4x .••ry0s 1....%• c r' r' "i •� i
I. X� 'ly 1t i F `' �A ;�, i •Y i �., e ,�
0 75 150 300 .1 $ a 'i
Feet ` '� f ;1!:
.q .►,j`1;,; r•-. . ,as``.,,,i'i� kc , .+•.^ .. ,. f+,1i,. •_t i�[ ,�• t}: y, ti.t1 ,�, 1y !I^L. .1,4
{�• '�'4'•i Y' .F'I.. • } ,L.!-11, ''

- .r:. N
&+ ;: - -. -
J -
•
7.
/ I 4 t ,r 1.-+ ;r Axiom nvrron+neniai,Inc.
iii?- fg. A i ;
i
/ t 101;1 '�'. •:, :r4 Prepared for:
------"---, -4- 13' 4 lit?' - .4.
Rs
. .,,_
....... , ., , ,,,,„_ , . ,,,. ...„„.. . ,.0„.,„, .
...... .
,_ . • ..„... ,,„. ., . * ;
.,, ,., , . ,,.. .t.'9,.. !.1 ',..1 47•11.t11. e
— /�' '� -•� • r /.. , s . ., ',.w'� 7_.' .:,F l'• .‘4,.;1.
l 1-• RESTORATION
/ ...v.."
/. •r'7•: /` t 0.---
' r�, SYSTEMS 1 LLC
..O � •
• /• �� i .\ !. -�•' ' .,`k' ; :''.-, F y,
•
/ ' a x s� Project:
..r-
.. 7••_.•___.• \
;�' sus �!.�.
, . 4,_ ,....... ,--- , .• •. . . .
/ /'` Alamance County, NC
/� /.•� r
i �• •/' ,
�.� Title:
�� ;y` • I
•
/i' s" •/ - - ' .•-ice - _-, _:,.t . .`,s!A.A.,.` 1,k1 e
t.
•
•
-:j
'/ •_ " f, ' ,�4� 9'd t )b' Notes:
t 1.Background Imagery Source:
N� p7� ' 4. _ ..� ' t.. �. .—. s n r 1 ,;1r c s . �v �• � ,1r T. *. r, - �, 9 9 Y
i. if ! .•* i ,. ' ,1 •,,y.. t 4 1 . 45� 2014 aerial photography
j I' f• �r • h s+ �1 tm r, IiEF " . a�.�,q.~• �▪ ; • �';. r ;rr. 1 ,L14,1,0,.. 7! ; provided by the NC OneMap
` :a - . r •ry • "• 4 '_tr..,"vF�1' ',.-0.-
^ i. ,v`• 4� f-: YA z.rK :•,� 7
1 i V. '« ,�F i' r� .7` N�- 3 �' 3 •r •7:�--'q. ,�' - IDS rr• program ( P Y
r;, 1 +� ,; � `' t _ • '"-' e ro ram online, provided b
; " �' qLy ] 1! I F.' * ;;+ ,a ~•� y ' .j ,s 'i;.. the NC Geographic Information
. '•f .1�.5'�;.y6/. {ir,1 L � ry/• /\` /: •1 .i�, +'3.� .•1ti :I: V...#1 �3' .ii l ,Sl ..j - .:
T,1 ti •s 1' ••
�' I }� s i v ram• - _-, _ �, {, i � wii `+ .• f ?F n�. it r.;' i I Coordination Council)
.?`• ;� •�' '1.
t +j R v .,1 e }�,, 1. .`! f I,1Fl,, ,• ,b �'; i. A•�j� T`".. k • • :`'l4 "a` +! ^}1 •` ,•
,t•. _�] '• -+ -, a '_Y ,� ,. ..44 f t ,.x t. lit
' I t Ia,., •R 1r;� �91Lkir, ' 7 i �w:n• tV• i ,'�' f �`, lY I� r,
i , _ r ..!,r. +.e `}� .. 4 ,, ,,. i, 471- 1qy{5f '"I. - °i i' i. ., ry ,Iju F 'F • "Vt.'.F_ :J,+'' qr". ;L,+� y {I'i � r }l 3. rs
- �� r 'i�7." `� ._ •-�' .,.�1''` I 1 �.1,,.I: r•, '.�.; SS'!: r 1 vo• s tit F . ,s. 'IC' S .0 ���y I ;. r 4' I '
f .i^, K ",r p1 �T ,_ 4 • t � ▪ 1 r 1 c 1. F�v ,k• i '�� �•
� � i� 1 '. 1• �l � �r�;r � •� �'., �.� tia•W t � � .��• 1� �? i.rl ��;y ti r,
+ IL r i1: �`hjti r 1 /L�_` t .� +e1. y� 1 �� v r, } 1 I,
Conservation Easement=5.16 ac M' ; 'l •,,a -r • yy t r i a "4' }. n F. { I'"
1 ''.1, .' Y 11 1 e 'e � �'I, .1 , IAl1 — i. ': •
;i 1 . " l �,+ ,v+L- yt,I ` A, IL
- . i'' '' ' i -• 'r'•fii!�•;:- r,, j• l k
Restored Stream Channel=0.18 ac i ' .1' Y �� • i .'';III yAir (j'.: ,� -'-r i kljtr. tV ! I`.s' "\ '. i h,•ll n !!' F fi
• • ?`'ry�..-�" ?-•� :-•� - t � �.4`�i. � l . "�,,'t'• t ti i. iii•••� ! \.E.; 1 t��' j�ti I� ��� V- ;
Riparian Buffer Restoration Area(TOB-29 ft)=0.003 ac(152.83 sq ft) •10 .i a • F. \'•1,. i. ✓; i.•: . ",,N,‘ •Riparianft) sqft)
it 1 i ,,y}i•.: ; �;' j• e
P ( ( ,i, .,•... X.i `e 1 `s4 i }� If ' 1I 2r.: •I
�.. - ,,, � .f=:.a �'� � ` Date. MAR 2018
Nutrient Offset Credit Area 101-200 ft)=1.09 ac 47,626.47 sqft) `- ` .' a.: f- )r, �1 !t 1Ly '4 '}
•
• 4 'i,1- 1 , ri-' 1 - R" f 0 ;,0 li �;, Y r
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-29 ft)=0.001 ac(54.43 sq ft) i i • F;v'' Y ri •i 7 �Yi { }�'( i. t,l\ • j ; 1s ,; Scale: 1:1200
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=0.94 ac(40,784.55 sq ft) } :r •v- `6 17 •%.} ) 6 L� 1 •4:1' i�, '�- Project No.: 16 017
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.003 ac(113.87 sq ft) .'.c,�� I j;1 ` :A'k 1 e
1771j Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=0.54 ac • _
i���� Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac y,' n pp
- - 50ftfromTOB s FIGURE
-•- 100 ft from TOB •
,
- 200 ft from TOB _•r 1 i 6 rn
CVS Plots - - �- -
e [
3
0 50 100 200 300 400 500•
'� .:a +' . ;' _' �?. r-: '. .: •i,
.i- -a . '' r 5 i f ti `4 a - t:'.A. ' '
Feet .+_, +`T'• r i _ '; RW''''',°+ I,;.. + n 1, . �i ,r _ ,, °, „ , •a
.6- ••ir' cl-,.._,I:.gz .,x.agamo, ..+, r- e_� .a<: :d�•.11Y.—x gar ..:.W a. „si., ', d r".� :r.a• • l.r.• _~45F` ate-

•
..i..kli,,i,;. *,,,, :• .
n k ly' 4
'I
h — •* •7 1•.4-..it t?.4 .
'ti"TH ,•• ,., . Axiom EnwonmenlaI.Inc.
•
# ta
, i,.r: �. r ', Prepared for:
;M• ...):I {
ils
__ .. v il.. .r t.. J�`4 1'•'. ,4I.i
T r k i , .• ..r.it1 ,� �W;'. 0. '4 RESTORATION
{sC • in 4 4rj �," ,' , ', I ' i 4} �{ ' .: • f ; A.1 ...11 • SYSTEMS I LLC
.....,.-0.....).... .... .i.v..
.,4.....ii...,0.4,,;m1;..' ...,,i .1.iti. ,I,
• ,' • jf { ;*'�, 1• rJ ;x' .,)1i—
' I.li4. # ,4 k• •�1 ' I Project:
�F+•' •
_ ,. .,. �, ,r • .I 'I.t. il•I� its Ais i. ;.11.• l'.I,r..l� tip,':, ":}% 7u- J.I\
•
• . ROCKY TOP
'k _- _$ BANK PARCEL
r
•
_ • Alamance County, NC
• ' Title:
zw;'' po- •-• .i..0. • . i
r I I CLOSE-UP OF
{ w„�, • RESTORATION
{' ! BUFFER WIDTH
ill
. ' • TOB-29 FEET
'INOTE: No riparian buffer credit is given Notes:
in areas with buffer width of less than 1.Background Imagery Source:
20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient offset ion
2014 aerial photography
credit is given in areas with buffer width • 1 provided by the NC OneMap
less than 50 ft. I. program (online, provided by
, the NC Geographic Information
I5
Coordination Council)
6.
Inset Scale 1:600 iiir 1' ,.`� 'rr ' L , . ...
`d Ii .,IFF ,;
7" * •�}fit ,
rya: .I 5 t K
`� 1M1..._ rysl, • l
n i k'l �I�`Mt111JJII• �'k'��Q 1 " r _ � _7.I{ t
J •.i ♦ 1 Ut4141%.011k�. • II ,.� 1 *.4;• '".ti -' 'I.�rr' }}' r'y:!: i;l. I� �I I ,i L'����nnn f.
fg.
Le endre a r, . 41, �q, i'11'' 1, ,i' ��,.' �� 4' .s; f .,) K.tt t. , I . . � .. Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
•
• .... III I 3A * I�' I , R ,ki t. OCT 2017
Conservation Easement=5.16 ac '• �'�" ; � �4 { • ,;}�};I'ti, ,� +4 fi+I� .i t � 1+1;' ,+ , i�' I �. ' ',�y; ' .. • Date:
Restored Stream Channel=0.18 ac r y l , v r ,y . ;. $ l i I' I + ,k? }'Hi: Y 10, ' Scale: 1:2400
• 9. I I. 4s. �1. •
f1. 1 ! 1
Riparian Buffer Restoration Area(TOB-29 ft)=0.003 ac(152.83 sq ft) `' lir _ I 17 1 'I ,i' • Tt�'I , I I�'{; '' y . „ P
�` '' ( '� I I.. S ail ?„ . u , 7
r,. ; ij?.a ti t { , '1 . . '. , .., £, I I 'i'r'� x _.. a r+ t+'; .:411.. '.`;t,•. Project No.: 16-017
Riparian Buffer Restoration Area(TOB-100 ft)=2.35 ac(102,356.48 sq ft) `,3 , I yp` �'
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=1.09 ac(47,626.47 sq ft) 1 , dwAill ' + + r ' NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS:
* + ' ; TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for •
` Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-29 ft)=0.001 ac(54.43 sq ft) �}f ° i f 1 • 4#,tf FIGURE
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=0.94 ac(40,784.55 sq ft) 'k '*•Rom.' Sir, I , •i'•' '�.r no credit.
•
''' TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 20 ft from
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.003 ac(113.87 sq ft) 4' �w. ' g u 0
the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 75% credit.
, -'1,Z Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=0.54 ac .. 5 ,
�� 4 TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 29 ft from /�
��� Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac ; ,_ _ ,....
i• r the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 100% credit. ' i�
I - 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft from i,
0 250 500 1,000 the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 33% credit. •
Feet
-; .
. . ••F kl

,,fir . ,i,• t 1L . ' c,. _ur1.Ar.
,: . L ' .F .' i . `` 'c N '_ ` �
�
i f �T ^. I1 0
•
ylly {' Y f1 I Affir 'Ili
sr / ,Ir +l'. : ?.i '. 1= . , �r Axiom Envlonmeri1 1,Inc.
/ }:: I.i
NOTE: Riparian areas that fail to qualify , .I, ., !'Ii.'t ` ' r, L. .1�
to generate wetland mitigation credit may be _ , '• ! - ;. , .�. ; I 1". i,.. ,: I:' ,�-;,
/ "' 1' Prepared for:
viable for generating riparian buffer credit. Any / t. �� it y. l• p
g g p �;1.1
areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must / �" . {' .a�. '`, `".,' I`Ift
s;:. - /-•---•-� c . fin.i •+ :f-'f`2'i. • '1:, 1 IA
_ �:��.��- " meet standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295. /�
i f• - - I. - •'' '1. . , ir . ..:Ari.it iiii2S
_ J/ '�. /.'., f" `41 n .�. �= s �' o. RESTORATION
/ �- '-' f 3` 1- •'i t,] SYSTEMS 1 LLC
/ •-•;tom-• 4. r t 14 1 1 44. I I -' ;,-
tti ../.... , .,...! .; \. ,-',' ., ' • n!'t ' I Project:
" ' ����� r' ,it, -' , 4 _ -14' !_ . i ROCKY TOP
/ ,•./' ��1 , i .' )-' - 'a \ �,, h'.i',''i - ,► '-• 'LIP.• r 1• BANK PARCEL
UT-1 ... -. .-.1---- •• • - - ', . : • ,L-t'l ' ,; L'•" ' '' . t'`- ' • '''';. A.:.,..-f-..t ---77'pi: ' iLt L?' ''.:'-i_L 4: ti ITs. "1 1 iL !‘..7••, -
---
ti , 1 r 1' yti t �"y Alamance County, NC
4
_ t. , -- I+fr ;s• ifr
Y Title:
,i •/ _ \ �,. • i .. >. --- ,..`; ' •i 2 '' `;' -,, + ., 1 ,f,t1 POTENTIAL
F 'OIL , r"r rt ; . 'r , . r.i . ; ,' ;I CONVERSION
.. .
-� •
/• r'Ar- , j -i , ,, '' 1 + •`' 1 OF WETLAND
.14
•
y • [ "/� iiiiallo41"tw .44jjyy C 1 A� ;, ;s CREDIT TO
4 + -�-- ....._, ; '' �?' i.. r `1; I. '1 't , 1. ' RIPARIAN BUFFER
,/ �r Y3 1 1. ., ,: ,�,. „r #.. w �' .. ,, i. CREDIT
0
_ } ;• • �fie -- g i _. H. , -- i'i . • • ..) ,:i l' �' f,, •►� �,.1 . :"' y 1 �7 Notes:
•
1 "1 '` . - 7 _. -.. . �1. + a '" h ` 'tj f '' 1.Background Imagery Source:
A• �fl. tt 'y. - i V' i 'k '.i..: 1+ a.. c ��i ^•) . ., �4 • _ . • s•,-\14 .. 2014 aerial photography
itte'3. - y �'1,; �L# I, / 4.'';. 4 �`t- '.'.: #; tk'A.i'Y t 'X. 14 - i:r i :ati- ,lff l fi provided by the NC OneMap
�, t { •it"' ', 1 u s • •
r,`,•' , }I } :a 'S ''7 't e r �sy`' 'If i � �' 'I. fc • program (online, provided by
4� r 1r• ,, �_' r • e• 0.3, ?,+� 4� :, • 4 ��• ^�,-� ' �I v .,{ , (' the NC Geographic Information
4 ;_ .r A. :P4 � r.* r4 " - ''t --- 'i 1,..,,,,,,,---01.4
r r` {i �,r r, "+� v, 4. „. L 'Pl ! a ti :--- Coordination Council)
' 1 � --..J.-:,1`.. ,�+ ,[4 -- - ,1•_ . [s i' s ,1i� r ,�:�, i�.: " t i i ) r�. � y: 9" ^• r h' r I LF;i •r. .e I _ 1` •4t'1'4 i
., ,,}17' r•'� `.{I + TS '..I-A. . }` , - 1s,1 'i S+ .ljt r}`{i . to.: .0t r.• , 1 .r 4 .. Y.• �....ti' :o., e‘` ye, k* ;:- f t ;r 1.\ j•• {{ l $,i' .r
Y t �. -' '''';-.4-
, S: • :,- 1S 1,'N+� ( `JI• .II• J !A 5 , -..0,„•A@:.0 u�. 7� .] .' ',l •:r J r�4 f , .., '4.1, 4 1+ '�' L A 'L_ ! y1' 7 `. '." {L
` •'�, • 1" • 41 e '^� � i rrr ;w1• �f•i I.� 1 +, {•' `r r'77 �}s_} } -' • ¢1 .41.,}w ,'}} 1 ../p." : I, ,ti�- u'• ` Y r�:S(•`}y I'i" - F�, 'L}V;i '.l ,.
x„ *f}• ' ] •S .i Ir't�rrC- ii' 'x' k '1 �'-; l '� 5 1 !,y:. ` ��,1 1 1 ,i.• 4I. i3/1 Lid > , 4;�. } 01 t; t r• -,x . rt,`• e• 4: .l I .I r r , 1
Ir. - - Y 54)1
.t*' } t tl , �� �, .l `i tt �,' MCI' t -t':- .i: t ' - ,,1,
l 1' }{6�, � t ' .n. ji •� y1 �' a' j.�- :� I_ '�� �- ,_,,le.':,.L - 1:�. ��.. l
ooti' ,. i ,. f 1� .[ *,I .1 ' vA' el. .R''.- ' a id 1. S.-i+ , , l-. .1 ,� ;0!-.tl4 ,G * •Y �. ti ii,/,,. b 'r 1 ._
.�. r r' { 1 , �'. 1.1. •�^ .� M. I , r . ° •4 � S�} - 'S. �{"`/ yid' � ` ".'.+, •�1•_�-, �`+' '� �� �{'� {19r'�� �-'. ��, ,�1 r.' 1.� _ _
` ' •1 .i 1,1i 1 I 1y ', . I i ,Sh 1 .r. .,'. .%. ' 'S:- I r 1',' ` if ,1. ' i4 '.L' _{ 1: �'
- 1. _ Y .` 'Y T- �' f �'•1'`i -''f ./ . 4. ;5 :�� x s.: :j .`' �y t f{ '•• -
I. i 'M t :1 1 . ;V #"' % t - i€ e S w 1i. 1 ,1 n!{I ' r`. ]y
� i. 'i 1 '� •J - .1 `_'7' _� ••• •'r4 i H•.'�,,,,. + • i ,, .t ,{.• .l i i 1 S .
.. � , ' �r' �.i. �'!; .. . . . _ ,. , ,. Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
r, H
4 ' ',':ji , - .•;bv i�`' ' �,,_ 14 Digit Watershed ID:03030002050050
t..i•A 1 i . , 't...,. � Date: OCT 2017
. Legend = `. - t ,. 1 , , '' ti Potential Conversion of Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
- - ; Scale: 1:1200
L �Conservation Easement=5.16 ac z. - *Buffer Percentage of Mitigation
Credit Type Total Area Mitigation Ratio -. Project No.: 16-017
Width Full Credit Units
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft) �{ � 1
no 14,835.11 ft2 14,835.11 ft2
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft) lj r'••;lr:, ' TOB-100 ft Restoration 1:1 100%
(0.34 ac) (0.34 ac) _ h;
Restored Stream Channel=0.18 ac Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(15A 8,877.94 ft2 4,438.97 ft2
TOB-100 ft NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6) (0.20 ac) 2:1 1 oo�/o (0.10 ac) vt FIGURE
►_-.1 Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac
- - 50 ft from TOB Total Potential Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 19,274.08 ft2
--•-• 100 ft from TOB (0.44 ac) 5
- - 200 ft from TOB
*TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum
Loy. 50 100 200 300 - 400 500 of 100 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 100%credit.
Feet
us ur,•

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 5.Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Species Quantity
River birch(Betula nigra) 200
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis) 250
Eastern redbud(Cercis canadensis) 350
Silky dogwood(Cornus amomum) 575
Green ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 350
Tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 25
Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 550
Black gum(Nyssa sylvatica) 350
Water oak(Quercus nigra) 700
Willow oak(Quercus phellos) 650
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 250
TOTAL 4250
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 6. Planted Stems by Plot and Species
CVS Project Code 1500703. Project Name:Rocky Top
Current Plot Data(MY3 2020) Annual Means
1500703-01-0001 1500703-01-0002 1500703-01-0003 1500703-01-0004 MY3(2020) MY2(2019) MY1(2018) MY0(2017)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch _Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 6 6 6
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree _ _ 1 1_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1_ 1 4 4 4
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 _ 1
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 4 4 4 6 6 6
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 2 7 _ 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 7 7
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 _ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
Nyssa tupelo Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 9 9 9
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 5 5I 6 8 8 9 7 7 7
Quercus oak _Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4
Quercus alba white oak Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 13 13 13
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 14 14 14
Ulmus americana American elm _Tree 1 _ 1_
Ulmus rubra slippery elm Tree _ _ 3
Stem count 11 11 14 7 7 7 5 5 7 11 11 13 34 34 41 37 37 52 43 4+_ 51 76 76 76
size(ares) 1 1 _ 1 1 4 4 4 4
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Species count 5 5 8 5 5 5 4 4 4 6 6 6 13 13 15 14 14 17 12 12 13 12 12 12
Stems per ACRE 445.2 445.2 566.6 283.3 283.3 283.3 202.3 202.3 283.3 445.2 445.2 526.1 344 344 414.8 374.3 374.3 526.1 435 435 516 768.9 768.9 768.9
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% P-all=Planted including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Table 7. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data- September 2020 Data
Rocky Top Bank Site
Species Common Name Transect 1 (70°) Transect 2 (87°)
Betula nigra River Birch -- 2
Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud -- 1
Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon 2 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar -- 1
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 2 2
Quercus alba White Oak 1 1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 3 2
Ulmus americana American Elm 2 --
Stem Count 10 11
Size(Ares) 1 1
Size(Acres) 0.02 0.02
Species count 5 7
Stems per acre 405 445
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Rocky Top
MY-03 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken September 2020
lirril ---- -7
Plot 1 Plot 2 " +�
Plot3 Plot
' r•
d
I' )i 2 ` 1
� f$, ..am
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix D.
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Attachment B
Delivered credit yields for buffer acres in Jordan small watersheds.
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (Ibs/30yrs) (Ibs/30yrs)
03030002010010 Haw 25% 10% 562.34 14.38
03030002010020 Haw 37% 36% 832.26 51.77
03030002010030 Haw 44% 40% 989.72 57.52
03030002010040 Haw 49% 44% 1102.19 63.27
03030002010050 Haw 55% 48% 1237.15 69.03
03030002020010 Haw 15% 4% 337.40 5.75
03030002020020 Haw 22% 12% 494.86 17.26
03030002020030 Haw 48% 43% 1079.69 61.84
03030002020040 Haw 32% 33% 719.80 47.46
03030002020050 Haw 32% 32% 719.80 46.02
03030002020060 Haw 47% 42% 1057.20 60.40
03030002020070 Haw 54% 47% 1214.66 67.59
03030002030010 Haw 60% 56% 1349.62 80.53
03030002030020 Haw 44% 31% 989.72 44.58
03030002030030 Haw 25% 8% 562.34 11.50
03030002030040 Haw 42% 30% 944.73 43.14
03030002030050 Haw 64% 62% 1439.59 89.16
03030002030060 Haw 39% 19% 877.25 27.32
03030002030070 Haw 36% 18% 809.77 25.88
03030002030080 Haw 73% 64% 1642.04 92.04
03030002040010 Haw 30% 14% 674.81 20.13
03030002040020 Haw 28% 14% 629.82 20.13
03030002040030 Haw 71% 63% 1597.05 90.60
03030002040040 Haw 32% 15% 719.80 21.57
03030002040050 Haw 52% 50% 1169.67 71.90
03030002040060 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040070 Haw 67% 60% 1507.07 86.28
03030002040080 Haw 53% 51% 1192.16 73.34
03030002040090 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040100 Haw 75% 65% 1687.02 93.47
03030002040110 Haw 66% 60% 1484.58 86.28
03030002050010 Haw 74% 68% 1664.53 97.79
03030002050020 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002050030 Haw 42% 17% 944.73 24.45
03030002050040 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
Page 1of2

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (Ibs/30yrs) (Ibs/30yrs)
03030002050050 Haw 71% 67% 1597.05 96.35
03030002050060 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050070 Haw 78% 72% 1754.50 103.54
03030002050080 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
03030002050090 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050100 Haw 81% 75% 1821.98 107.85
03030002060010 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002060020 Haw 95% 97% 2136.90 139.49
03030002060030 Haw 88% 91% 1979.44 130.86
03030002060040 Haw 97% 98% 2181.88 140.93
03030002060050 Haw 92% 95% 2069.41 136.61
03030002060062 Haw 98% 99% 2204.38 142.37
03030002060070 UNH 40% 19% 867.70 27.32
03030002060080 UNH 59% 45% 1279.86 64.71
03030002060100 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060110 UNH 61% 58% 1323.25 83.41
03030002060120 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060140 UNH 85% 89% 1843.87 127.99
03030002060130 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060160 LNH 85% 90% 1932.07 131.76
03030002060090* UNH 92% 94% 1995.71 135.18
03030002060090* LNH 92% 94% 2091.18 137.62
03030002060060* UNH 94% 96% 2039.10 138.05
03030002060060* LNH 94% 96% 2136.64 140.54
03030002060150* UNH 88% 91% 1908.94 130.86
03030002060150* LNH 88% 91% 2000.26 133.22
*Watershed is located in both the Upper New Hope(UNH)and Lower New Hope (LNH)Subwatersheds.
Page 2 of 2

Appendix E.
Vegetation Monitoring Datasheets
Rocky Top Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

�v -LJZ ef�lr-'t v c i ow •
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500703-01-0001 P.m:,: Role: ,Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / / - / / ✓J tot f. New...planting date m/yy?
Taxonomic Standard: P 14d Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.886654 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) c.co
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.388678 UTM Zone: 0 . _
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 76
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- s
ID Species Name * * lcm* Vigor Damage Notes
P char O.lm O.lm lcm 1 cm 1 cm sprout
15507 Quercus nigra () R 3.7 2.6 34.0 ❑ -. n 7 Ge„e'
15508 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 4.8 2.2 55.0 ❑ i ri ❑
15509 Platanus occidentalis Q R 8.5 1.9 80.0 ❑ I t 0
15511 Quercus alba O R 7.8 5.8 71.0 ❑ -70 ❑
15512 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.8 5.4 38.0 ❑ ' 0 El _
15513 Platanus occidentalis O R 7.3 8.0 84.0 ❑ _id.:,..
15514 Platanus occidentalis O R 5.0 9.0 Missing ❑ ❑ ✓•;-,
a 15516 Platanus occidentalis () R 0.2 5.2 52.0 ❑ g'O
El
15518 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.6 8.9 35.0 ❑ ) ' 6 p El 7
15907 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 5.6 2.2 58.0 ❑ C. 7
15908 Quercus alba © R 9.2 6.0 48.0 ❑ S' U - -
15909 Quercus alba () R 3.4 8.4 44.0 ❑ L.Xv.�
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name SourCe* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1
0
1
1
•
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlar.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Rooms M=Mechanically,U=Unknown
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,UV'
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Pi-into
. r

Plot(continued): 1500703-01-0001 Last Year's Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species map source X Y ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam nlin2**:
height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- Sub =10
�7 c
./c.
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1 (`` —
r) , i, 1 _ .
_ _
_ _
..
, _
_ _
**Required if cit-off>10cm or subsample?100%. •1 1.2 • 3 1••4 "5 I t+ t•7 1,38 la i0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• •• •• • I
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,_L=Live stake,13=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublip&R=)are Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.2
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0
1.

Map of stems on plot 1500703-01-0001 x-axis: 76° N #stems: 12
map siz
e:
LARGE
LARGE
•
p
•
Y:5n
(i)
4 — ;
a:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown P.3
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500703-01-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / / - / / 10 i v(, New...planting date m/yy?
Taxonomic Standard: l°F-1 h liCheck box if plot was not
Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: .
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.886308 Datum: NAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) ,."
Longitude or UTM-E: -78.388702 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 111 -
Plot Dimensions:X: ' 10 Y: 1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data Z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vig
or** Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15519 Quercus pagoda ® R 2.0 0.7 38.0 ❑ l5t 0 a
15520 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 1.1 4.9 105.0 DBH?❑ aci i it i y
15521 Liriodendron tulipifera O, R 3.0 4.8 Missing ❑
15524 Betula nigra Q R 1.7 2.0 40.0 ❑ _ I=
15525 Cornusamomum ® R 5.5 4.2 tIrr:r+tg Q i,;l
❑15527 Quercus sp. ® R 5.8 0.3 20.0 ❑
15528 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.7 0.4 78.0 ❑ '/0 ❑ =J
15533 eelt*sescideutal'is C e C9` ® R 7.7 8.7 120.0 DBH?❑ © t( l� "-/
15535 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 2.8 8.5 72.0 ❑ /(0 / El
15536 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.7 7.5 35.0 ❑ i C?
15538 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.8 8.8 241.0 1.1❑ ',Go _3(Z 4/
15539 Comas amomum ® R 4.9 9.8 ❑ e Missing - -
15541 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.5 9.7 165.0 0.8❑ ;Cr r) irG r Cj
15542 Betula nigra O R 0.3 8.0 Missing ❑ W CI a -
15543 Quercus pagoda ® R 0.4 7.0 20.0 ❑ ❑ IT
15544 4e amemQm-MQ,v r 7 Oar R 1.5 8.1 61.0 ❑ , O 3
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form: •
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
•
i h -:
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling..R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p_4
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnny Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500703-01-0002 Last Year's Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &bnbsamNine**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub_ 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
- I -
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 .2 N* i.ia .4 •fir I , 1718
} + NI FotmWS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant_L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Pots Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanicall_, U=Unknown 1,,_5
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the C.VS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500703-01-0002 X-axis: 11 1° N #stems: 16
size:map
LARGE
•
d
1':Sm
4i1ti(1) X:5n1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically1 U=Unknown p.6
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Too!ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500703-01-0003 PE : Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / / / / - New lanting date m/yy?
Taxonomic Standard: 1 Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: / pp � /�
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.886427 Datum: NAD83/W , C r'I P
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 79.387487 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 80
1
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X •
Last Year's Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15548 Cercis canadensis ® R 3.6 0.2 23.0 ❑ l 3( ❑ 4 -
15550 Quercus phellos ® R 1.9 2.5 - :
❑
Missing P.,- � -
15553 Quercus phellos Q R 4.9 4.0 45.0 ❑ LIr
15555 Alyce..0 i V r ® R 8.1 0.8 50.0 ❑ &
15556 Nyssa sp. ® R 10.0 1.0 30.0 ❑ Cf o ❑ -
15558 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 6.0 6.7 Missing ❑ P"
15915 Nyssa sp. Q R 6.1 4.3 38.0 ❑ 5-0 .d i- j
15916 Nyssa sp. 0 R 2.0 1.0 35.0 ❑ r /
#stems: 8 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
EX planation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam pi ing**:
Fieleht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ Inc ❑ 50cm ❑ 1011cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- _
Species Name I c sub-
50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cit-off>10cm or subsample?100%. N1 1.2 • 3 1••4 •-•' 6 IM•7 1 �#u ` 9 10 Fonn W S2,ver 9.1
• •• •• •• ■
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap.P=Pott d Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanicall:. U=Unknown p.7
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500703-01-0003 X-axis: 80° N #stems: 8
map GE LARGE LAR
Y:5m
1)t. 0
•
(0.(I) X:510
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown P.8
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0—dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0
1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500703-01-0004 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / / - / / New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: = Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.887099 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.387010 UTM Zone: Mil
Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 92
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15572 Quercus phellos () R 5.2 1.9 51.0 ❑ c0 ❑ 1„p,4(._
15573 Quercus nigra ® R 7.5 0.0 71.0 ❑ i 0 3
15574 Quercus nigra ® R 5.4 0.3 Missing ❑ _
15575 Quercus nigra 0 R 7.2 1.9 Missing ❑ ❑ "tA
15576 Carpinus caroliniana ® R 9.5 2.0 62.0 ❑ 0 7 J
.j
15578 Quercus phellos ® R 6.7 4.2 69.0 ❑ 6 :�
15579 Quercus phellos Q R 8.8 7.6 Missing ❑ 57) ❑ 3
15580 Quercus phellos Q R 7.2 9.3 55.0 ❑ al 3 r
15582 PlZaflas-cccideulalisl D f1 t• © R 4.3 6.7 --zg ❑ ,-1 3
15585 Quercus nigra Q R 0.0 6.0 60.0 ❑ /eld 1=1 3
15784 Quercus phellos ® R 5.1 9.2 38.0 ❑ -' -
e � � yea..
15918 Quercus sp. ® R 1.7 6.4 36.0 ❑ 0 }
,,,,,..
15919 Cercis canadensis ® R 5.0 6.4 25.0 ❑ CIU El
3
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
l' ,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.9
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ,ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500703-01-0004 Last Year's Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ l0cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub_ ' =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
/ e
1 •
•
**Required if cut-off>10cmorslibsample?100%. °I •2 : 3 1*41
4 !Is 1r6 In7 IS38 10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.10
*VIGOR:4=exceUent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10:m if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500703-01-0004 X-axis: 92 o N #stems: 13
map size:
0 LARGE
' .}
:5n
of
•
[R
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _.p11_
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LNESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0