20141149 Ver 7_Year 3 Monitoring Report 2020 (Draft)_20201119

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20141149 Version* 7
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/19/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/19/2020
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands rJ Buffer 17. Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz [e-mail]
Project Information
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20141149 Version:*7
Existing ID## Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS C•' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Orphan Creek
County: Alamance
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: 2014-1149-V7 Draft Orphan Creek
7.91 MB
Buffer_2020MY3_.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*
r

YEAR 3 (2020)
MONITORING REPORT
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel
DWR#20141149 version 7
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems'Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits
,P Mi iii,
dFi. .. - ''
tf r � � I
yy4 k .y
5 �1d3�� �� • Vj i � i � i A 1 _.Sr � •
`
, \4 t^ n; fir+� c ''E'\
i
ir
l'I rri 4.--k r- - er ' 4v_ . . .... ,,..
4 . .r,
''dd •,, , ., 1 .., , ,„ .„ ... ,._:„
ai ,y 7..-� . L
PREPARED BY:
FisRESTORATION SYSTEMS,LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET,SUITE 211
RESTORATION RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27604
SYSTEMS I LLC
AND
1 AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
4‘;Lcii\ 218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27603
Ax€om Environmental, Inc.
November 2020

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems,LLC(RS)has established the Orphan Creek Bank Parcel(Parcel),proposed as part
of the Restoration Systems'Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument(Banking Instrument)
signed October 25th, 2017 between Restoration Systems and the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources(DWR).Per the Jordan Lake Water supply Nutrient Strategy,Consolidated Mitigation Rule,and
Nutrient Offset Payments (15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, 15A NCAC 02B .0295, & 15A
NCAC 02B .0240), this Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits
for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake in the
Cape Fear River Basin. Supporting figures are included in Appendix B.
The Parcel was evaluated on December 16th,2014,by Virginia Baker of DWR.Ms.Baker's evaluation was
part of an inter-agency review, including the US Army Corps of Engineers,to determine if stream features
located within the Site are applicable to provide compensatory stream mitigation under Restoration
Systems'Cape Fear 02 Phase One Umbrella Banking Instrument(Orphan Creek USACE Action ID SAW-
2015-01698). Riparian areas adjacent to features providing compensatory mitigation for stream impacts
were restored and provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit.
The Parcel was planned and designed according to the Banking Instrument with DWR, 15A NCAC 02B
.0240,and the Consolidated Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295,which became effective on November
1st,2015.The BPDP was designed in concurrence with the Orphan Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank (SAW# 2015-01698). The mitigation plan for the Orphan Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank, along with the Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, was approved by the
Interagency Review Team on July,6th 2017. The Section 404 permit(Clean Water Act,33 USC 1344)was
granted by the US Army Corps of Engineers on June 30th, 2017, the corresponding Section 401 Water
Quality Certification was granted on June 28th, 2017, and the land quality letter of approval was granted
June 20th,2017.
Project construction and planting were completed between October 30th,2017, and December 22nd,2017.
Baseline monitoring data was collected between mid-and late March 2018. Site-work involved restoring
and enhancing riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite to reduce non-
point source contaminant discharges to downstream waters in the Haw River sub-watershed of Jordan Lake.
All the riparian areas were assessed by DWR during an onsite visit to determine viability for buffer
mitigation and nutrient offset.During the site visit,all riparian areas were confirmed to have been in pasture
for cattle grazing.Approximately 7.01 acres will be protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of
those 7.01 acres, 4.52 acres were restored for Jordan riparian buffer credit, 0.22 acres were restored for
nutrient offset credit, and 1.74 acres were enhanced by removing cattle from the streams riparian areas for
Jordan riparian buffer credit.
In general, riparian restoration/enhancement area widths on streams extend out to a maximum of 100 feet
from the top of stream banks(TOB)with a minimum width of 30 feet.Riparian buffer enhancement credits
generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)but cannot be used to
generate nutrient offset credits. Additionally, no riparian restoration areas that are less than 50 feet wide
from TOB can be used to generate nutrient offset credit. Therefore, the maximum acreage of riparian
restoration on this Site that can be converted into nutrient offset credits, if needed by RS, is 4.52 acres.
Figure 3 (Appendix B) shows the Credit Determination Map, and Section 2.0 details the Bank Parcel's
mitigation determination.
Year 3 (2020)vegetation sampling occurred on September 16th, 2020. Stem density across the Parcel was
above the required average density, with 699 planted tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving
in year 3 (2020). In addition,all plots exceeded the success criteria.
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

After observing the Site for the Year 3 growing season, routine vegetation management activities will be
implemented following Section 4.2(Parcel Maintenance)of the Bank Parcel Development Plan to facilitate
continued success. These activities will include mechanical and chemical control of competing herbaceous
vegetation in targeted areas beginning early in the 4th year (2021). In intensive treatment areas, a short-
term nurse-crop seed mix may be planted to suppress weedy herbaceous competition. These management
activities will ensure the continued survival of the planted stems and the establishment of natural recruits.
The inter-agency review team members did not conduct a site visit as part of the annual monitoring effort
for the 404/401 mitigation activities located within the Parcel. Further,no comments were provided by the
IRT regarding site vegetation.
2019 Maintenance Summary:
A single herbicide application was performed during the 2019 growing season. The target species was
Japanese Stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum),and treatment occurred around UT-4 and UT-5.Further
detail about the herbicide application is summarized in Table 7 of Appendix C.
2020 Maintenance Summary:
Invasive Species Work Maintenance Work
May 12th,2020,September 10th,2020,and
September 17th,2020 February 20th,2020-large tree removal from
Japanese Stiltgrass,Cattail,Johnson Grass, easement fence and fence repair. No cattle
Sweetgum,Multiflora Rose,Privet,Russian encroachment.
Olive
General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 3
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity(i.e.,beaver,heavy deer browsing, etc.)was observed.
• 09-2020 drone video: https://youtu.be/lr Fr jua2M
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page ii
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 PROJECT GOALS,BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES 1
1.1 Location and Setting 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL 1
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 3
3.1 Monitoring Protocol 3
3.2 Parcel Maintenance 4
4.0 REFERENCES 5
APPENDICES
Appendix A.Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Appendix B. Figures
Figure 1. Site Location& Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Appendix C.Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix D. Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Appendix E. Vegetation Monitoring Datasheets
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Table of Contents page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

1.0 PROJECT GOALS,BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems,LLC(RS)established the Orphan Creek Bank Parcel(Parcel),as part of the RS'Phase
One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument(Banking Instrument)signed October 25th,2017 between
Restoration Systems, and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources(DWR).
The Parcel encompasses 7.01 acres of land located 2000 feet north of Payne Road and Salem Church Road.
Before construction, the Site was characterized by hay fields and livestock pasture; livestock had
unrestricted access to the Site's streams resulting in deeply incised streams and direct non-point source
inputs,including livestock waste.A narrow riparian fringe had developed on the stream margins composed
of opportunistic species and a few mature trees. Located in the South Atlantic/Gulf Region approximately
2 miles north of Saxapahaw,NC and 7 miles southeast of Graham,NC in eastern Alamance County(Figure
1, Appendix B), the Parcel is hydrologically situated within the USGS 14-digit HUC and Targeted Local
Watershed 03030002050010 of the Cape Fear River Basin and Jordan Lake's Haw Sub-Watershed(DWR
Subbasin Number 03-06-02). The main hydrologic features include four unnamed tributaries (UT) to
Meadow Creek and adjacent floodplains.
Directions to Parcel(from Saxapahaw):
• From Church Rd. and Jordan Dr. intersection, go north on Jordan Dr.—0.1 mile
• Jordan Dr.becomes Saxapahaw Bethlehem Church Rd.— 1.8 miles
• Turn right on Payne Rd.—0.7 mile
• The Site is on the left; access site using the driveway to barn and agriculture fields.
Site Coordinates: 35.978992, -79.315216
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
According to the Final Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities(NCEEP 2009),this watershed should
be targeted for restoration to protect the nutrient-sensitive waters that ultimately drain into the nutrient-
sensitive water supply of Jordan Lake.Overall,the purpose of the Orphan Creek Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Bank is to restore, enhance, and preserve riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated
streams onsite.The riparian restoration and enhancement work will improve water quality within the Parcel
and the downstream watershed. The Parcel is located in a region of the state dominated by agriculture and
livestock; restoration of the riparian buffer is expected to result in immediate water quality benefits within
the vicinity of the Parcel through the removal of livestock access to Parcel streams.
Primary goals focus on 1) improving water quality, 2) enhancing flood attenuation and hydrology, 3)
improving aquatic resources, and 4) restoring riparian habitat. Mitigation activities provide floodplain
connectivity/resistance,stream stability,sediment transport,surface/subsurface storage/retention,in-stream
habitat, riparian habitat/structure, thermal regulation, floodplain biogeochemical processing, pollutant
filtration, and pollutant source removal.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The Orphan Creek Bank Parcel provides Jordan buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits for
development impacts within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake. The width of the credit
generation area begins at the most landward limit of the TOB or the rooted herbaceous vegetation and
extends landward a maximum distance of 200 feet where applicable.A maximum of 4.52 acres of riparian
restoration on this Site can be converted and transferred from Riparian Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset
Credits and from Nutrient Offset Credit back to Riparian Buffer Credits upon approval and does not include
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 1
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

any of the acreage being mitigated to generate wetland mitigation credit.The Sponsor must submit a written
request and receive written approval from DWR before any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer
and nutrient credit ledgers. All delivery factors shall be applied to nutrient offset credits before requesting
a conversion.
According to the nutrient reduction goals for the Haw River arm of Jordan Lake, the generated nitrogen
credits per acre in the Haw Sub-watershed for riparian restoration on agricultural land is 2249.36 pounds,
and the generated phosphorus credit per acre is 143.81 pounds. The delivery factors applied to this Parcel
are 74 percent for nitrogen and 68 percent for phosphorus (Appendix D). Delivered credits are calculated
by applying the delivery factors and the acreage of riparian restoration to the generated credits per acre
stated above. Based on the asbuilt report, Jordan riparian buffer and nutrient offset (Nitrogen and
Phosphorus) credits for the Orphan Creek Bank Parcel are summarized in Table 1 and the corresponding
Figure 3 (Appendix B).
The Sponsor will maintain 4 credit ledgers for the Parcel under the Banking Instrument and BPDP: (1) for
buffer restoration mitigation credits in both square feet and acres, (1) for buffer enhancement mitigation
credits in square feet and acres, (1) accounting for nitrogen offset credits in pounds and acres, and (1)
accounting for phosphorus offset credits in pounds and acres.
The Sponsor may elect to use riparian areas for either buffer mitigation credit or wetland mitigation credit,
but not both. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR before
any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer credit ledger. As part of that request, the Sponsor must
provide DWR with a written acceptance letter from the USACE, accompanied by supporting documents,
for any wetlands that they want to be removed from the wetland mitigation bank. Only riparian areas that
fail to qualify to generate wetland credit may be viable for generating riparian buffer credit. Figure 3
(Appendix B)depicts riparian areas that could generate riparian buffer credit if they don't qualify to generate
wetland mitigation credits. Figure 4 (Appendix B) represents the potential conversion of failed wetland
mitigation credits to riparian buffer credits. Any areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must meet the
performance standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table
14 Digit Watershed ID: 03030002050010 -
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
*Buffer
Mitigation Percentage of
Width Credit Type* Total Area Ratio Full Credit Mitigation Units
from TOB
TOB-100 ft Restoration 196,725.78 ft2 1:1 100% 196,725.78 ft2
(4.52 ac) (4.52 ac)
TOB-100 ft Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 75,686.90 ft2 2:1 100% 37,843.45 ft2
(15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6) (1.74 ac) (0.87 ac)
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 234,660.23 ft2
(5.39 ac)
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 2
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table(continued)
Nutrient Offset Credits
**Buffer Generated
Credit Mitigation Total Generated Delivery
Width Delivered Credits
Type Type Acreage Credits per Credits Factor
from TOB Acre
101-200 ft Nitrogen Restoration 0.22 2,249.36 lbs/ac 494.86 74% 366.20
101-200 ft Phosphorus Restoration 0.22 143.81 lbs/ac 31.64 66% 20.88
*TOB-20 ft=Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for no credit.
TOB-29 ft=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 75%credit.
TOB-100 ft=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 100%credit.
101-200'=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 33%credit.
**Buffer mitigation credits are sought from TOB to 100'.Beyond buffer credit generating areas,RS is proposing
nutrient offset credits out to a maximum of 200'for a contiguous riparian restoration from TOB to 200'where
possible.
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
3.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual
plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed
as outlined in CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2(Lee et al. 2008). Photos will
be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All planted stems
in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.Detailed qualitative and quantitative monitoring
is proposed for vegetated riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected periodically and
reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report as required. Reporting will include a photographic
record of the Parcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Each monitoring year, RS shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR no later than December 31 st.
Quantitative monitoring includes measurements of 7-10x10 meter, permanent vegetation plots (3.2% of
restoration and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted riparian
areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be performed in the Fall
of each year; monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.
During the first year, planted vegetation received a cursory visual evaluation to ascertain the degree of
overtopping of planted trees by nuisance species. Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient
offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre
after five years of monitoring.A minimum of four native hardwood tree and shrub species must be present,
with no one species representing greater than 50%of the stems. In addition,appropriate volunteer stems of
native hardwood tree and shrub species may be included to meet the final performance standard of 260
stems per acre upon DWR approval.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion and preservation areas within the conservation easement will
also be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the Site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 3
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting,clearing,filling,grading,or similar activities that would negatively
affect the function of the restored buffer.
3.2 Parcel Maintenance
After observing the Site for the Year 3 growing season, routine vegetation management activities will be
implemented following Section 4.2(Parcel Maintenance)of the Bank Parcel Development Plan to facilitate
continued success. These activities will include mechanical and chemical control of competing herbaceous
vegetation in targeted areas beginning early in the 4th year (2021). In intensive treatment areas, a short-
term nurse-crop seed mix may be planted to suppress weedy herbaceous competition. These management
activities will ensure the continued survival of the planted stems and the establishment of natural recruits.
2019 Maintenance Summary:
A single herbicide application was performed during the 2019 growing season. The target species was
Japanese Stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum),and treatment occurred around UT-4 and UT-5.Further
detail about the herbicide application is summarized in Table 7 of Appendix C.
2020 Maintenance Summary:
Invasive Species Work Maintenance Work
May 12th,2020,September 10th,2020,and
September 17th,2020 February 20th,2020-large tree removal from
Japanese Stiltgrass,Cattail,Johnson Grass, easement fence and fence repair. No cattle
Sweetgum,Multiflora Rose,Privet,Russian encroachment.
Olive
General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 3
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity(i.e.,beaver,heavy deer browsing, etc.) was observed.
• 09-2020 drone video: https://youtu.be/lr Fr jua2M
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 4
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., JM Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson,
J.B. Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US
Geological Survey,Reston,Virginia.
Jordan Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, and
15A NCAC 02B .0295
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level 1-2 Plot Version 4.2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality
Plan. Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=2eddbd59-b382-4b58-
97ed-c4049bf4e8e4&groupld=38364. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources,Raleigh,North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP 2009). Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=
864e82e8-725c-415 e-8ed9-c72dfcb55012&groupId=60329
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation.North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,Division of Parks and Recreation,
NC Department of Environment,Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh,North Carolina.
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report page 5
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix A.
Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity/Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA January 22nd,2018
Parcel Protection via conservation easement NA October 18th,2016
Easement Assignment to Land Trust NA August 31st,2017
Cattle exclusion/fence construction NA March 2018
Planting NA March 14th,2018
As-Built Data Collection NA March 5th—23rd 2018
As-Built Report Submittal NA July 2018
Year 1 (2018)Monitoring October 2018 December 2018
Year 2(2019)Monitoring October 2019 December 2019
Year 3 (2020)Monitoring October 2020 November 2020
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Firm lir POC&Address
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Bank Sponsor Restoration Systems,LLC Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer: Axiom Environmental,Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC 27603
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Construction Contractor: Strader Fencing Inc 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring,NC 27592-7756
Mary-Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
Planting Contractor: Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton,NC 27932
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Seeding Contractor: Land Mechanics,Inc. 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring,NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection& Axiom Environmental,Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
Annual Monitoring 218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC 27603
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 4: Project Baseline Information&Attributes Table
Project Information
Project Name Orphan Creek
County Alamance
Project Area(acres) 7.01
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) Latitude: 35°58'45.7"N,Longitude: 79°19'00.1"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030002 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030002050010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-06-02
Project Drainage Area,Total Outfall(miles) 0.20 mi2
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area < 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification Pasture and Forest Land
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix B.
Figures
Figure 1. Site Location& Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

[} �YYentrrarth� �YanreXv�le' $�f '
" 1 •war,o,z — •
,,a,....._....-
,� - r...1.• r- ,ss� _ 4.?,ews ems: ;u,__IL, IV
,,..
1
,. / ... ,.., .,„....„, .
h10unYain - - - 7,,,„",..,... r
_ ! IN:. ..7 ' --' '-''
• :4ITI1il158 �'_2:93Ft Pine Hall y
AAw.inulc,.e1.
f f P,,,,,,Zouott....11,71.,...71ac.: AiUOm Envrronmenip:.Inr.,
��:r � _ •b. ii::��. - �i i r Hurdle Yills ., `
rm7!!e laird a n o
e Prepared for:
• C�eeF.
Berews CreakillOr'''.. • ld0�nte in Prospect Hil!
:bin ETII a Br ixgfo uurail i7.
•
riCli
.S' Sd mni L'en.•ns=ummt '• � �.Ragemor! .
meld
Bank Parcel Location ��
l �s 4 USGS 14-digit HUC 1}1 `�,�
walk",.! �' • 03030002050010 `+
!E8. • kRidge . z:7•Fu-k _ :#t7t .
r r �'.�g... .. ... - ...�Lu y Bahama �'L RESTORATION
I L eV1P° 'Ill 4823 Salem Church Road t ���� SYSTEMSIIEC
T - .t Haw River, NC 27258
s rrrs _ ti.r..n�wn Project:
" r\./:ne °IfaK v. __ _�;;,e 35.979398°N, 79.315874°W �:,
m. role� _,:, - nihs¢w. e ,-
k.- ¢Ilege Burl n,. rr,eca , :
Hi i•r 3 Lr •
' AieW
ORPHAN CREEK
'�r BANK PARCEL
Efland •"• •
- r:I.:5
..•••AT/ ,Green• n - wfl��I•-� Hillsborough
it
Sedalia Graham r ❑ccrr,ic`�c'-rc
�! dour,-. • Lh`'- . AoilipH. , Butner
/
±. _ ti Alamance County, NC
41
Iwala.g zar. v •- - �l Title:
�1 �� +� f --'-plurnam :': : ::
4 '
L.• • in
. — I Cey
•
Notes:
.. re L 1.Background Imagery Source:
+c,n-.f-L.er Lake rr ca,E sr��,w c.mn - DeLorme World Besem ap
l n.rpr.iile -$ _ _ 2206 G-" -Lti`r Iw•.Dkma (2014)
,/ / >J .53 ill , . _
• • Lilo r<I'
J
A,(...... . 3.-•••--._ •a•
j .. f}f
• 1}. 1 JJ_�• an
q So ph
NdfiYrill/
f �... J 0. ,, Randlanlan - ti ,�' '.` yl
.),,,,ir Ar
.,_,.• t
‘':* ,/ - IllirlirWil
MTh ree'It(at Shepr:erd � S _ h'- 4 ��
hlounlAb �` S �� �[` II '] '� •• C c res ) .� ,... ' f'\ :fi.r..r��•1�.. - • Drawn by: KRJ
.4...)0,./ .
• 1 ),,,
•
.f �-� r ackLreek II�Ly� Frankrim.4ne '--g� _ .. ---�0E Date: SEPT 2016
'Mauntein €� Ban..., �- _ _ ,=H ickocy-- -_ •
j` l`«s- � ` Sy_ 1, Sile+ClSy _ -- AMauniain Pills[mrn �*I - Scale: 1:3500
I, -x .Ashe•boro s ..� 5lv Ci i, opal
L �}
r �� 1 ==_- iihiC A r : � Project N o.: 16-017
Legend ° Y,% d )
Jordan Lake 14-digit USGS HUCs 3l F9 Mwtntumn r �F
r' />( i {' 4. Huffy Spr,ngs_. FIGURE
Parcel Service Area Haw River Subwatershed *if) i Tom-,SIIP ®�- ev Eft a•
l' Haw River Subwatershed rd•,r,• •R '4f! ' �u 0 a gyp:
d r •1 •• Agarorr Harris
New Hope Creek Subwatershed " .. a.��nor y
-110 .. .w, it.,... ,tee F�
�^�1 C • •
R i • , Furwwar--5,1,77al i
0 5 10 20 30 40 ! � ��, +-� r. ii, 11111 2,
Miles gaff ] i _ I
• ~' a.m¢¢k' i // Copyright:©2014 DeLlorme

al► , #i'. y r 1
.A
. . .
. . , _., r#
4 a ` A iom ffnvKONryenlal,Eric.
o r f'Yr. �. T Prepared for:
0 4. '6,•• 0. # :
Rs
. .
..
2 1
l •
'L
r' r is , 1.
"• , ,,,' ,y +# RESTORATION� y
' : f &"' i ! SYSTEMS LLC
r
y o ,
'F r RL , {}I ,4 Project:f o y
i".
i ;• F• ti,! - `j -_.�..- f ; / ._ -.$r. ORPHAN CREEK
- f - �` .4 ~k : , ', � BANK
y ,T �►. PARCEL
f' i. e ...
r �� •
5 Alamance County, NC
t • . , f ' 1 : .` Title:
irf • ,.:4444, ., e *. ' 7•
r, .. I. ..
�,. 3 CURRENT
CONDITIONS
r 6 PLAN VIEW
_ It
• gam .
F It 4 �► : 1J I r }+s a
p
+f s+ Drawn by:
^�•
., 4 KRJ/CLF
r' I ::::e
:
4; O OCT 2020
''':.:410. .e.':.. '''. ,..4
, ,..., , rR fN. :
^6 ' r: `: 1►' •,�. � 1:1400
• Y, ;' +
#�~ ' e 1 Project No.:
F�
i a 'V i- ,+ •'{i 1 . •
I.' 1. ?C • tom': f, ter �� •
• Legend r : ' fit • .., •
s ',' �.r j FIGURE
_ Orphan Creek Easement=7.0 ac "5: ,,. '•r'= ., I" I *r� ti — _
jx` $; t11
Stream Channel(Design) 4 . ' „ ' ,• , %`
CVS Plots 2
y am-,
I
0 75 150 300 450
Feet
NCCGIA

� N
. -..
uw 4!nwrona!nc.
• F .�. ` 4 Prepared for:
4
" ._pep
. "- ' .„ f-
tic\' ... 17': r.,,, . -
.,- i,;..:..,, i'.'.:, # A ,L.
- ' -''''-:, Si- . , .-Iff .,..-:-..:.....-47„.„: . .„
Rs
. .. ..
:.. . „,„,, . ._ ..„....„_,-... ; q
• sa
• RESTORATION
' •. ` SYSTEMS I LLC
i &
/' /".. "T '�, Project:
k •y /'• , �Y
p
•�n
( f { r r..
• I 13
.• + �" t 3:'_ 3_ - r • ^SRC -y
r i L ti.° sY, ,.; ,-ti -Er.
a •* ( r / ,/ `" ', - '�,, • .. , ::i Alamance County, NC
, ,.a r` , 4� % J I _ 'i' �. I Title:
,4•`., / / 4 r / ,
' N lillit.
4114 ,. \ \,,
.�.. ' ..�•.� `.. lai \ �--� _ ^�4•\ _-- , _ _ \ Notes:
� •., •• y ' 1.Background Imagery Source:
#F"� k ia. j; _/ -_^ "` \_ 2014 aerial photography
— •\ x ' provided by the NC OneMap
'P '',• I. ` .._ Information
• �\ \ program (online, provided by
_ _ - the NC Geographic
` �" �' I ) Coordination Council)
L '{
Conservation Easement=7.01 ac +: —'____ \\ •�•-•' r
Restored Stream Channel=0.43 ac .• Eti �s. \ t ;
// Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.22 ac(9769.53 sq ft) \\
w. Date: MAR 2018
Riparian Buffer Restoration Area(TOB-100 ft)=4.52 ac(196,725.78 sq ft) \ • DWR Stream Flags - For purposes of calculating
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)= 1.74 ac(75,686.90 sq ft) Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits, these Scale: 1:2000
Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=0.09 ac
,♦♦, flags represent stream termini. Project No.: 16-017
��� Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac _
CVS Plots
"!! —••— 50 ft from TOB ,- -. _. }'- . FIGURE
--• 100 ftfromTOB
200 ft from TOB
DWR Flags 3
Yam.
0 250 500 1,000 -—oh -
F-- I• -Ih,
r;• NCCGIA

^_
^_
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ/CLF
OCT 2017
1:2000
16-017
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
Alamance County, NC
ORPHAN CREEKBANK PARCEL
POTENTIAL CONVERSION OF WETLAND CREDIT TO RIPARIAN BUFFER CREDIT
4
Notes:
0 500 1,000250Feet
Legend
Conservation Easement = 7.01 ac
Riparian Buffer Restoration (TOB-100 ft)
Riparian Buffer Restoration (101-200 ft)
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion (TOB-100 ft)
^_DWR Flags
Restored Stream Channel = 0.43 ac
Constructed BMP Footprint (no credit) = 0.02 ac
50 ft from TOB
100 ft from TOB
200 ft from TOB
³
1. Background Imagery Source:2014 aerial photographyprovided by the NC OneMapprogram (online, provided bythe NC Geographic InformationCoordination Council)
UT-1
UT-2
UT-3
UT-1A
UT-1B
DWR Stream Flags - For purposes of calculating Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits, these flags represent stream termini.
NOTE: Riparian areas that fail to qualifyto generate wetland mitigation credit may beviable for generating riparian buffer credit. Anyareas proposed for buffer mitigation credit mustmeet standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
UT-3
NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS:TOB-20 ft = Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for no credit.TOB-29 ft = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 20 ft from the TOBand a maximum of 29 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 75% credit.TOB-100 ft = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOBand a maximum of 100 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 100% credit.101-200’ = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft from the TOBand a maximum of 200 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 33% credit.
14 Digit Watershed ID: 03030002050010
Potential Conversion of Wetland Credits to Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
*BufferWidth Credit Type Total Area Mitigation Ratio Percentage of Full Credit Mitigation Units
TOB-100 ft Restoration 0.07 ac (2949.49 sq ft) 1:1 100% 0.07 ac (2949.49 sq ft)
101-200 ft Restoration 0.001 ac (51.49 sq ft) 1:1 33% 0.0003 ac (16.99 sq ft)
TOB-100 ft Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) 0.02 ac (962.29 sq ft) 2:1 100% 0.01 ac (481.15 sq ft) Total Potential Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 0.08 ac (3447.63 sq ft)

Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3 (2020) Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems, LLC

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data

Table 5. Planted Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Table 5.Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Species Quantity
River birch(Betula nigra) 650
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis) 250
Eastern redbud(Cercis canadensis) 350
Silky dogwood(Cornus amomum) 750
Green ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 1550
Tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 225
Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 1500
Black gum(Nyssa sylvatica var.sylvatica) 250
Water oak(Quercus nigra) 700
Willow oak(Quercus phellos) 1000
Black willow(Salix nigra) 500
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 300
TOTAL 8025
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 6. Planted Stems by Plot and Species Project
Code 1500704. Project Name:Orphan Creek
Current Plot Data(MY3 2020) Annual Means
1500704-01-0001 1500704-01-0002 1500704-01-0003 1500704-01-0004 1500704-01-0005 1500704-01-0006 1500704-01-0007 MY3(2020) MY2(2019) MY1(2018) MYO(2018)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS IP-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 10 10 10
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 7 7 7 13 13 13
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 3 3 3 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 5 3 3 3
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 8 8 8 4 4 4 11 11 11 2 2 2 26 26 26 28 28 28 29 29 29 28 28 28
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 6 6 15 5 5 5 3 3 6 2 2 3 2 2 5 1 1 1 19 19 35 18 18 19 22 22 36 27 27 27
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 3 17 4 24 1
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 9 3 3 5 5 5 5
Nyssa tupelo Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 3 1 1 1 7 7 7
Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Tree 2 2
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 3 3 3 1 2 2 6 2 2 2 12 12 12 2 2 2 9 9 10 30 30 36 30 30 34 29 29 29 20 20 20
Platanus occidentalis var.oc Sycamore,Plane-tree Tree 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 7 7 7 12 12 12
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 51
5 5 9 9 9 10 10 10
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 13 13 13 11 11 11 16 16 16 15 15 15
Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Salix caprea goat willow Exotic 1 1
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6
Ulmus elm Tree 1
Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 11 11 8
Unknown Shrub or Tree 2 2 2
Stem count 16 16 28 20 20 43 16 16 27 19 19 19 24 24 27 11 11 25 15 15 16 121 121 185 121 121 136 149 149 179 169 169 169
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 7
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
Species count 6 6 7 4 4 8 7 7 8 5 5 5 7 7 8 6 6 7 5 5 5 13 13 17 13 13 14 16 16 20 18 18 18
Stems per ACRE 647.5 647.5 1133 809.4 809.4 1740 647.5 647.5 1093 768.9 768.9 768.9 971.2 971.2 1093 445.2 445.2 1012 607 607 647.5 699.5 699.5 1070 699.5 699.5 786.2 861.4 861.4 1035 977 977 977
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% P-all=Planted including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% T includes natural recruits

Orphan Creek
MY-03 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken September 2020
Plot 1 . II, ".r.' s!.K;. Plot 2 T`, a d 44 : j .
2020/09/16
Plot 3 t f • � Plot 4 e ,•;
ems ��
fir, • "
• • 9 i
v. sr c ?•<.r e !- !)VIA. �, 'fi r
.Y t. l h '\_ f4. lr F`,, 2 f i t -
4•1
•
`' '.i
Plot 5 Plot 6 i
ate+ r "r� �Y, �>
'• e'er ..'.
.
:',.-
Fes •
.
. '') I.,
c .
- 2020/09/16 2020/09/16
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Orphan Creek
MY-03 (2020) Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (continued)
Taken September 2020
Plot 7 ~ -a1 ��`'r
$ 's
p. ; 1;Y,
r
yet:elk
"i_ , L_-'. v-
2020/c9/16
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix D.
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Attachment B
Delivered credit yields for buffer acres in Jordan small watersheds.
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (Ibs/30yrs) (Ibs/30yrs)
03030002010010 Haw 25% 10% 562.34 14.38
03030002010020 Haw 37% 36% 832.26 51.77
03030002010030 Haw 44% 40% 989.72 57.52
03030002010040 Haw 49% 44% 1102.19 63.27
03030002010050 Haw 55% 48% 1237.15 69.03
03030002020010 Haw 15% 4% 337.40 5.75
03030002020020 Haw 22% 12% 494.86 17.26
03030002020030 Haw 48% 43% 1079.69 61.84
03030002020040 Haw 32% 33% 719.80 47.46
03030002020050 Haw 32% 32% 719.80 46.02
03030002020060 Haw 47% 42% 1057.20 60.40
03030002020070 Haw 54% 47% 1214.66 67.59
03030002030010 Haw 60% 56% 1349.62 80.53
03030002030020 Haw 44% 31% 989.72 44.58
03030002030030 Haw 25% 8% 562.34 11.50
03030002030040 Haw 42% 30% 944.73 43.14
03030002030050 Haw 64% 62% 1439.59 89.16
03030002030060 Haw 39% 19% 877.25 27.32
03030002030070 Haw 36% 18% 809.77 25.88
03030002030080 Haw 73% 64% 1642.04 92.04
03030002040010 Haw 30% 14% 674.81 20.13
03030002040020 Haw 28% 14% 629.82 20.13
03030002040030 Haw 71% 63% 1597.05 90.60
03030002040040 Haw 32% 15% 719.80 21.57
03030002040050 Haw 52% 50% 1169.67 71.90
03030002040060 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040070 Haw 67% 60% 1507.07 86.28
03030002040080 Haw 53% 51% 1192.16 73.34
03030002040090 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040100 Haw 75% 65% 1687.02 93.47
03030002040110 Haw 66% 60% 1484.58 86.28
03030002050010 Haw 74% 68% 1664.53 97.79
03030002050020 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002050030 Haw 42% 17% 944.73 24.45
03030002050040 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
Page 1of2

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (Ibs/30yrs) (Ibs/30yrs)
03030002050050 Haw 71% 67% 1597.05 96.35
03030002050060 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050070 Haw 78% 72% 1754.50 103.54
03030002050080 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
03030002050090 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050100 Haw 81% 75% 1821.98 107.85
03030002060010 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002060020 Haw 95% 97% 2136.90 139.49
03030002060030 Haw 88% 91% 1979.44 130.86
03030002060040 Haw 97% 98% 2181.88 140.93
03030002060050 Haw 92% 95% 2069.41 136.61
03030002060062 Haw 98% 99% 2204.38 142.37
03030002060070 UNH 40% 19% 867.70 27.32
03030002060080 UNH 59% 45% 1279.86 64.71
03030002060100 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060110 UNH 61% 58% 1323.25 83.41
03030002060120 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060140 UNH 85% 89% 1843.87 127.99
03030002060130 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060160 LNH 85% 90% 1932.07 131.76
03030002060090* UNH 92% 94% 1995.71 135.18
03030002060090* LNH 92% 94% 2091.18 137.62
03030002060060* UNH 94% 96% 2039.10 138.05
03030002060060* LNH 94% 96% 2136.64 140.54
03030002060150* UNH 88% 91% 1908.94 130.86
03030002060150* LNH 88% 91% 2000.26 133.22
*Watershed is located in both the Upper New Hope(UNH)and Lower New Hope (LNH)Subwatersheds.
Page 2 of 2

Appendix E.
Vegetation Monitoring Datasheets
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Or ulaq [re{kc - h,-" 'cq,,f, . 1,c1-1
Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0001 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (in) (mm) (cm) (cm) I (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0001 Party: Role: Date last planted:
w lanting date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / [(Q / I- Ne
/ / _ llCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: ( ,f-r L€j t"" ` r Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.979502 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) oo
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.318247 UTM Zone: _
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 99
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis.(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data 'Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vi or Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1516 Quercus nigra ® R 3.9 0.8 84.0 ❑ l4C ❑
1517 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 4.1 3.1 104.0 DBH?El ❑
1521 Fraxinus pennsylvanica a I: 6.0 2.7 r:i.0 ❑ ❑
1522 Comus amomum ® R 6.3 4.0 68.0 ❑ ❑
1523 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 8.0 2.5 120.0 DBH?
1524 Quercus nigra ® R 7.7 0.5 41.0 ❑ 0
1527 Quercus sp. ® R 8.4 4.2 49.0 ❑ Id
1530 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q` R 9.1 5.5 115.0 DBH?❑ f0 ID L/
1531 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 9.4 7.3 $3.0 ❑ ❑
1532 Platanus occidentalis O R 6.2 7.4 87.0 ❑ 1 5 ( [
1533 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.8 10.0 80.0 0 ❑
1534 Platanus occidentalis ® R 6.7 8.1 87.0 5'a - ❑
1535 Platanus occidentalis ® It 8.2 7.0 130.0 DBH?0
1536 Quercus phellos O- R 7.0 9.9 61.0 ( ()c4 ❑
1538 Quercus phellos Q R 0.7 5.2 20.0 E �•
1539 Quercus sp. ® R �, 2.4 9.9 41.0 ❑ it,
I_�! '
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obvily planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) I cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
ir
' '
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=TuI?ling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. I
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MQWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE 1
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1
i.•

Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0001 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DAiA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
t-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &u Imam piine*u*:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1 , ` R
•
L; 4)� _ ' "
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. Si 1.2
I:: ••4 "5 Irt+ 1=7 1 8 I Y �10 Fomi WS2,ver 9.1
••*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.2
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0001 - X-axis: 99° N #stems: 16
(ID LARGE
- 1
45
1
` b
1L l
®r
I
f
Y:.5n r —
I
4 1 /(‘'
tpi k
) V
a
(0.0) X:5 ri
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplants L=Live stakes B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown P.3
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in Me CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: /! 6, / - / / New...planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: f yPi,ktL,r Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ---)-.d(e'
Latitude or UTM-N: Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: r UTM Zone: M
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 150
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout g g
1540 Collins amomum a R 0.1 2.1 6 l.0
1543 Cornus amomum O R 2.2 2.7 44.0 ❑ (i t> El 3 _
1544 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.0 1.7 Missing ❑ ❑
1546 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 4.9 1.8 70.0 ❑ / ' ❑
1547 Quercus phellos ® R 2.3 4.3 01.0 ❑ ' ❑
1548 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.3 4.2 Missing ❑ l 90 ❑
1549 Comus amomum 0 R 7.0 3.5 r,LO ❑ ❑
1550 Comus amomum ® R 6.7 1.0 57.0 ❑ -1 U t
1551 Sambucus canadensis O R 8.7 3.8 4-5.0 ❑ ,r, ❑
1552 Comus amomum O R 6.9 5.5 74.0 El 03 n
1553 Comus amomum ® It 6.2 7.8 7'5.0 ❑ ❑
1554 Sambucus canadensis 0 R 8.7 6.3 150.0 0.7❑ iCi r~ r) ❑
1555 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O Ft 8.4 8.3 A0 ❑ icto ❑
1556 Comus amomum 0 R 5.8 9.7 80.0 ❑ t( ❑
1557 (Ri R 5.1 6.3 '�5.0 ❑ I , a ❑ ,
1558 Comus amomum 0,..j
O R 4.9 8.7 61.0 ❑ q (.- ❑ . ? t
1559 Cephalanthus occidentalis O R 4.0 6.8 Nr).0 ❑
1560 Quercus phellos ( R 7 2.7 6:-1 15.0 ❑ - ,J El
1561 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.2 9.0 N0.0 ❑ g.- ❑ I GJ
1562 Quercus phellos 0 R 1.7 7.3 45.0 El -4 ti
1563 Quercus phellos 0, R 0.2 7.8 n L0 ❑ 2 0 yr
1564 Sambucus canadensis 0 R 1.6 6.0 23.0 ❑ ❑
#stems: 22 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
[Jfr, n Icf 1 ko ,
, F____
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin'.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.4
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3-good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1
1

Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0002 Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S UA iA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH *
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampllne*:
Ileight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
C` i 1
LI:- t
q Cti _ — — !
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. .1 i+2 a r Ir i4 `"^ I�i l+ j 7 1=8�} '� 0 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.5
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0002 X-axis: 150° #stems: 22
N map size:
0 LARGE
•
d A
Y:5„
•
is
Qi
/
i
co,0) x:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tub1ing,R=bare Root,M=Mechanics y,U=Unknown P.6
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnfry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0003 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / : 1 - / / New...planting date m/yy?
{orCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: L-104. 4 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.979291 Datum: NAD83/W -
(dec.deg.or m) -79.317569I'V
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone:
L
Coordinate Accuracy(m): I-
X-Axis bearing(deg): 109, ,
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 5 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm . *. lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1566 Quercus pagoda () k 1.0 0.6 15.0 II Ill )
1567 Quercus pagoda © R 2.1 2.7 Missing ❑
•
1568 Comus amomum 0 R 2.5 4.6 106.0 DBH?❑
1569 Quercus pagoda 0, R 4.8 2.9 30.0 ❑ d.,)- .
1570 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.8 0.6 206.0 DBH!!❑ t a .
1571 Quercus nigra O R 5.3 0.5 99.0 . ❑ E!
1572 Quercus nigra Q R 6.5 2.8 66.0 ❑ 1
1573 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.3 0.3 270.0 2.2❑ ? L i, 7 G/
1574 Quercus pagoda () R 9.7 0.4 40.0 0 I-
1576 Comus amomum 0 _ R 9.8 4.8 38.0 LI1 1 T 1._ 3 , 40
1577 Comus amomum ® I r 6.9 5.0 65.0 El 0 L I
1578 Betula nigra ® R 9.4 7.2 71.0 ❑ i3 u
1579 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O d: 9.6 9.5 92.0 ❑ -
1582 Cornus amomum Q R 5.0 5.0 105.0 DBH?❑ + n it
1584 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O I R 3.1 9.2 124.0 DBH?❑ {u� . x,
q i
1585 Quercus phellos ® R 0.7 6.9 59.0 ❑
1586 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.0 9.0 120.0 DBH?❑ .
1587 Comus amomum 0 R 0.2 4.8 87.0 ❑ -PK) i 2 `/
1588 Betula nigra O R 7.7 9.4 61.0 ❑ ❑
#stems: 19 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burla;'.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanicalb._U=Unknown p 7
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Oth?r/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane;DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0003 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- * *
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Vigor Damage Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A,ubsampiing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): 0 10cm ❑ 50cm 0 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
/f f /
e
•
**Re quiredifcit-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. rl .2 • 3 1.4 N5 I 6 1
=7 I=8 I In10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted-Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically=U=Unknown P.8
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnrry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0003
X-axis: 109° N #stems: 19
U
,\-� map size:
LARGE
R
_
O
d
t
/41
14
Y:5n b
o i -
0
79{
\ ?II •
f;) Of
-*
(0,9) X:51n
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanicallv,U=Unknown r 9
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0004 Party: Role: Date last planted:
w l
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: Ci I TG / _ 1- / / r NeLjanting date m/yy?Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: I. kki9(.V'e-4 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: j((, .
Latitude or UTM-N: '35.979209 'Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ''`'°
Longitude or UTM-E: 79.317032 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 126
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1590 Cercis canadensis ® R 1.3 1.1 130.0 DBH?❑ •0 . 4 C Li
1591 Cornus amomum Q 1. 0.5 2.7 165.0 0.5❑ U
1592 Cornus amomum © R 2.7 3.2 190.0 1.0❑ 1 i)
1593 Cornus amomum CD It 4.5 3.3 195.0 1.0❑ --"
1594 Cercis canadensis Q R 4.3 1.1 80.0 ❑ J Or El 3
1595 Cercis canadensis () R 9.4 1.5 150.0 0.7
1596 Cornus amomum O R 6.8 3.4 145.0 0.5❑ ❑
1597 Comus amomum 0 It 9.1 4.0 105.0 DBH?❑ C
1598 Cornus amomum ® R 5.4 5.5 115.0 DBH?❑ 0 l(�
1599 Platanus occidentalis ® R 6.8 5.8 190.0 1.0❑ 111 r
1601 Cornus amomum O R 8.3 8.9 70.0 ❑
1602 Cornus amomum ® R 9.8 7.3 '78.0 ❑ n
1604 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 7.7 9.5 Missing ❑ �__i w
1605 Betula nigra ® 1? 7.7 8.9 Missing ❑
1606 Betula nigra `a.. R 5.5 8.9 60.0 ❑
1608 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.6 -7-2-CC, 92.0 ❑ n
1609 Benda nigra 6�� //'Q\R 3.2 9.4 54.0 Elz
/
1610 Comus amomum ® It 3.3 9.7 120.0 DBH?❑
1611 Quercus nigra ® R 1.2 9.7 "50.0 ❑ ❑ q.
1612 Comus amomum ® R 0.8 7.1 Ktl 0 ❑ -
1613 Cornus amomum ® R 3.5 7.0 70.0 ❑ 1 U
1615 Cornus amomum O R 6.7 9.4 74.0 ❑ ❑ F
#stems: 22 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously'planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.10
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool vet.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0004 Oct 2019 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
o
map source X Y ddh Height DBH 1, ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling*•:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shmter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES_ SAPLINGS —DBH ' TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cd-off>10cm or subsample?100%. 1I I•2 • 3 r:4 b I ( in' 1 g I} i 10 FonnWS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown • p.11
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in Me CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 126° #stems: 22
Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0004 ]v
map size:
LARGE
•
oi
(•
\o
:5m
cf(
LJ
1 O
0
tO
•
i
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Tran lant,L Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown p.12
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0—dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0005 P° Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: L //i / - / / New planting date m/yy?
`{ ❑Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: \)- 1,, t\� ‘Q.( _ MI
- Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: v.-3(,0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.979614 1 Datum: 'NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) {s°
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.315981 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 140
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH t Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1618 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.5 0.2 60.0 0 0 Li , _
1620 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 2.1 3.5 '98.0 0 ❑
i ).
1621 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.2 2.8 70.0 ❑ ,d 0 n .!
1622 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 3.0 3.1 73.0 ❑ '4^�0 {J £-/
1623 Nyssa sp. © R 4.4 2.1 59.0 ❑ i ( ❑
1625 Quercus pagoda O It 6.7 3.3 45.0 LI (A 0
1626 Cercis canadensis Q, R 6.3 43:8. 73.0 IIII Lf
1627 Cercis canadensis 0 H 8.8 0.6 70.0 Elt j
1628 Cercis canadensis () R 9.2 3.0 55.0 ID7 4 V .
1629 Quercus nigra O It 6.6 6.0 50.0 ❑ 1 6 L___1
1630 Cercis canadensis 0 R 9.4 8.3 55.0 Ei c ❑ 7 I
1632 Querens-phellos - ® R 5.7 8.3 55.0
1633 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 . R 5.7 6.0 80.0 ❑ ICI - t
III
1634 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 2.6 6.0 71.0 0 7 r I__1
1636 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.9 7.3 95.0 17 0
1637 Platanus occidentalis Q R 2.7 8.0 70.0 0 i ''
1638 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 3.6 9.0 94.0 0t -3
1639 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.6 10.0 73.0 ❑ i n
1640 Platanus occidentalis () R 0.7 9.5 62.0 ❑ _ 11 `7 -) '
El ❑
1641 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.4 7.3 50.0 r
1642 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.3 9.0 32.0 ❑ 3 6 ❑ `.
-
1644 Platanus occidentalis ® I7 0.6 5.4 70.0 0
1870 Cercis canadensis () R 9.1 5.9 42.0 ❑ G fi
#stems: 23 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=B 11 and burlap.P=Potted-Tu=Tubling R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.13
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0005 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
•
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
J 4 l
•
1 - _
**Required if cutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •I 02 •s3• �N4 N5 1-66 I '7 I 8` 9 10 Form W S2,ver 9.1
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. 14
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 140° #stems: 23
Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0005 N map size:
LARGE
" — 4
•
jO
I
Y:5n
•
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Rooti M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. 15
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

I
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0006 Party: Role: Date last planted:
L New...planting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / / - / / -
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: kit'c, k 4 4 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ---)-6/(d
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.979272 Datum: NAD83/W 1
(dec.deg.or m) ,"ra
Longitude or UTM-E: _79.315838 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 131
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vi or Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1647 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 0.9 3.4 Missing ❑ ❑ k,f
1648 Cephalanthus occidentalis ® R 1.0 1.8 70.0 ❑ l£
• 1 . E
1649 Cephalanthus occidentalis () R 2.9 1.2 125.0 DBH?ElE.
1651 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 4.6 0.1 119.0 DBH?❑ Car) El
1652 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.7 0.3 190.0 1.1❑ 1 ❑ v'f
1653 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.6 0.3 155.0 0.9❑ a), I. 4
1655 Quercus pagoda El ❑
O R 5.4 3.7 Missing
1657 Quercus phellos Q R 9.1 3.2 52.0 ❑ -
1659 Quercus sp. ® R 9.0 6.0 Missing ❑
1660 Quercus pagoda Q R 8.2 8.9 110.0 DBH?❑ 13 r6 t h El
1661 Quercus pagoda ❑ n©, R 6.6 7.6 Missing ` iti
1663 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 5.1 5.9 Missing ❑ El 4
1665 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.8 8.4 25.0 ❑
1666 Platanus occidentalis Q R 2.2 9.3 Missing E
1667 Quercus phellos R 3`O 5 "-SA-,,1 16.0 ❑
a
1871 Quercus phellos 0, R 7.4 5.8 62.0 ❑ D r
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Pl:3nted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. 16
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
• *HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0006 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanatiogof cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &cuNamollns**:
Hei2ht Cut-O if(All stems shoiter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
(f 4 1 fir/ i
**Required if cutoff>10cmor subsample?100%. .1 1.2 r 3 Ir•4 +-.5 I6 I 8 1110 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
I. ■• I.■ i• +di H fi
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=PottTu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.17
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CiS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0006 >X-axis: 131° N #stems: 16
^ map size:
U LARGE
f;
1'
r
1 c,________
yh
k
-b
I
I'
a
Y:5n1
6-.) )
(f,'
?lir
d
•• f
p
k
i a
(0,0) X:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant:L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 18
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500704-01-0007 Part : Role: Date last planted: 1
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: G` / , / - W / /
= New lanting date m/yy?
bCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: IP C(ft,h(Q 4 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (d
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.978788 Datum: VAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) +-79.314356 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg):
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH P, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.Im 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1670 Platanus occidentalis ® k 1.0 2.2 140.0 0.6❑ n
1671 Platanus occidentalis Q R 2.1 2.5 35.0 ❑ - S❑! `
1672 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.5 4.0 K8.0 ❑
1673 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.5 4.2 110.0 DBH?❑ " 14 t L
1674 Platanus occidentalis © R 3.1 2.9 133.0 DBH?❑ -T
1675 Platanus occidentalis © R 4.7 2.3 120.0 DBH?❑ 'D AO_1r. ❑ '
1676 Cornus amomum () R 6.2 3.0 70.0 ❑ l l
1677 Comus amomum () R 9.9 2.8 85.0 ❑ b I 13 ❑
s
1679 Platanus occidentalis Q R 6.8 5.0 "4.0 ❑
1680 Liriodendron tulipifera 61.... R 6.1 7.0 42.0 ❑ 75---- ❑
1681 Platanus occidentalis ® R 8.5 7.1 102.0 DBH?Q ❑
1683 Platanus occidentalis Q R 9.3 9.8 68.0 ❑ I k)
1685 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 3.7 6.1 f,0.0 ❑ . 1-
1686 Quercus phellos ® -R 0.7 9.0 45.0 ❑ 65- ❑ ,� r .
1858 Platanus occidentalis Q R 5.0 3.6 115.0 DBH?❑
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(P'anted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M Mechanicall;.U=Unknown p. 19
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DI ER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site T. .DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

•
Plot(continued): 1500704-01-0007 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
ESicnlanatiou of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species subsamping**:
Height Cut-Off(A11 stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES _ SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
/r c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. 01 •2 • 3 ••4 .65 ip-•6 13 •
8 }1) �l0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
■ •• ,.• ■• ■ N
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.20
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1
4

Map of stems on plot 1500704-01-0007 Please measure bearing #stems: 15
of X-axis and record at map size:
top of plot. LARGE
C O
a
15
I 43)
,f
Y:5n
( t
.,./
/ f of
ID f f
•
(0,0) X:5in
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burls P=Pottedju=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown p.21_
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1
L