20141149 Ver 9_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2020 (Draft)__20201119

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20141149 Version*9
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/19/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/19/2020
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands rJ Buffer 17. Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz [e-mail]
Project Information
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20141149 Version:*9
Existing ID## Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS C•' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Benton Branch
County: Caswell
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Plans
File Upload: 2014-1149-V9 Draft Benton Branch
24.94MB
Buffer_2020MY3_.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*
r

YEAR 3 (2020)
MONITORING REPORT
Benton Branch Bank Parcel
DWR#20141149 version 9
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems'Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits
� �� 2G ` /3�0
•
!' i , '-may._.
PREPARED BY:
RESTORATION SYSTEMS,LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET,SUITE 211
RESTORATION RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27604
SYSTEMS I LLC
AND
AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27603
Axiom Environmental,Inc.
November 2020

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) established the Benton Branch Bank Parcel (Parcel), as part of the RS'
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument(Banking Instrument) signed October 25th, 2017
between RS, and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR). Per the Jordan Lake Water
supply Nutrient Strategy, Consolidated Mitigation Rule, and Nutrient Offset Payments (15A NCAC 02B
.0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, 15A NCAC 02B .0295, & 15A NCAC 02B .0240),this Parcel is designed
to provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development
within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake in the Cape Fear River Basin. Supporting figures are
included in Appendix B.
The Parcel was evaluated on January 16th,2015,by Sue Homewood of DWR.Ms.Homewood's evaluation
was part of an inter-agency review, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, to determine if stream
features located within the Site are applicable to provide compensatory stream mitigation under Restoration
Systems'Cape Fear 02 Phase One Umbrella Banking Instrument(Benton Branch USACE Action ID SAW-
2015-01701). Riparian areas adjacent to Parcel features providing compensatory mitigation for stream and
wetland impacts were restored and provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit.
The Parcel was planned and designed according to the Banking Instrument with DWR, 15A NCAC 02B
.0240,and the Consolidated Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295,which became effective on November
1st,2015.The Parcel was designed in concurrence with the Benton Branch Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank (SAW# 2015-01701). The mitigation plan for the Benton Branch Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank, along with the Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument,was approved by the
Interagency Review Team on July 6th,2017.The Section 404 permit(Clean Water Act,33 USC 1344)was
granted by the US Army Corps of Engineers on June 30th, 2017. The corresponding Section 401 Water
Quality Certification was granted on June 28th,2017,and the land quality letter of approval was granted on
June 20th,2017.
Project construction and planting were completed between February 14th and March 14th, 2018. Baseline
monitoring data was collected between mid-and late March 2018. Activities involved restoring and
enhancing riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams to reduce non-point source
contaminant discharges to downstream waters in the Haw River sub-watershed of Jordan Lake.All riparian
areas were assessed by DWR during an onsite visit to determine viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset. Approximately 33.14 acres are protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of those 33.14
acres, 10.45 acres were restored,9.40 acres were enhanced by removing cattle from the streams and riparian
areas, and 5.005 acres were preserved. An additional 0.08 acres were restored and generate nutrient offset
credit.
In general,riparian restoration/enhancement area widths on streams extend out to a maximum of 100 feet
from the top of stream banks with a minimum width of 20 from the top of the stream banks.Riparian buffer
enhancement and preservation credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC
02B .0295 (o). Neither the riparian buffer enhancement nor preservation credits can be used to generate
nutrient offset credits. Additionally, no riparian restoration areas that are less than 50 feet wide from the
top of stream banks can be used to generate nutrient offset credit.No riparian restoration areas that are less
than 20 feet wide from the top of any stream bank can be used to generate riparian buffer credit.Therefore,
the maximum acreage of riparian restoration on Site that can be converted into nutrient offset credits is
10.44 acres.Figure 3 (Appendix B)shows the Credit Determination Map,and Section 2.0 details the Bank
Parcel's mitigation determination.
Year 3 (2020)vegetation sampling occurred on September 30th,2020. Stem density across the Parcel was
above the required average density, with 372 planted tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving
in year 3 (2020). Each individual plot exceeded success criteria except for Plot 3 and 12-15. Plot 13
contained no live woody stems due to poor soil conditions and an extremely dense herbaceous layer. The
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

herbaceous layer consists of abnormally dense knotweed (Polygonum sp.), Japanese stiltgrass
(Microstegium vimineum),and ragweed(Ambrosia sp.).
RS conducted a Site review of the Benton Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration project on 10/27/20
with USACE representative Sam Dailey, DWR representative Erin Davis, and Wildlife Resource
Commission(WRC)representative Travis Wilson.Regarding vegetation,DWR recommended supplement
planting with container material in low-density areas with thick fescue coverage(along UT 1 and easement
edge of UT-6). Planting in monitoring plots was determined to be okay if noted in the 2021 monitoring
report.
2019 Maintenance Summary;
Lack of surviving planted stems in and around the upper portions of UT-3 (Plot 13), UT-2 and UT-1
were observed during the as-built walkthrough with DWR in July of 2018. The herbaceous layer
consists of abnormally dense knotweed(Polygonum sp.),Japanese stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum),
and ragweed(Ambrosia sp.). These areas were specifically treated in July of 2019 as part of the annual
maintenance program(Table 7,Appendix C).
Based on field observations and Yr. 1 (2018) monitoring data, RS implemented replanting of target
areas(UT-3 around Plot 13,UT-2,and UT-1)at an approximate density of 400 stems per acre. Species
planted and their quantity are detailed in Table 5 of Appendix C. RS Staff performed the replant in
March of 2019.
2020 Maintenance Summary;
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
May 18&26,2020 and June 24,2020
Multiflora Rose,Privet,Sweetgum,Tree-of- Two easement fence repairs due to falling
Heaven,Cattail,Japanese Stiltgrass,and trees/limbs
Fescue
After observing the Site during the monitoring year and re-visiting the areas that did not meet Yr. 3
(2020) success criteria, RS believes vegetation at the Site performs significantly better than what is
shown from the permanent vegetation monitoring plots. This was observed by IRT members during
their site visit for the 404/401 mitigation. All parties agreed during that site visit that containerized
trees should and would be planted in low-density areas with thick fescue coverage (along UT 1 and
easement edge of UT-6). Planting in monitoring plots was determined to be okay if noted in the 2021
monitoring report.
RS is working on a planting plan, including species type, quantity, and location. Before any replant
activity occurs,RS will work with DWR staff on approving the additional planting.
General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 3
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity(i.e.,beaver,heavy deer browsing,etc.)was observed.
• 09-2020 drone video: https://youtu.be/Ls466n9eJLk
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page ii
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i
1.0 PROJECT GOALS,BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES 1
1.1 Location and Setting 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL 1
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 3
3.1 Monitoring Protocol 3
3.2 Parcel Maintenance 4
4.0 REFERENCES 5
APPENDICES
Appendix A.Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Appendix B.Figures
Figure 1. Site Location& Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figures 3 and 3A-3f. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Figures 5A and 5B.Credit Determination(Changes from BPDP to As-built)
Figure 6. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Appendix C.Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7.Herbicide Application Logs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix D. Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Appendix E.Vegetation Monitoring Datasheets
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Table of Contents page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

1.0 PROJECT GOALS,BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems,LLC has established the Benton Branch Bank Parcel(Parcel),proposed as part of the
Restoration Systems'Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument(Banking Instrument)signed
October 25th, 2017 between Restoration Systems, and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
The Site encompasses 33 acres of land located on both sides of Milesville Road at the intersection of Massey
Road.Before construction,the Site was characterized by agricultural land utilized for beef cattle production
and municipal effluent disposal,with scattered disturbed forest.Located in the South Atlantic/Gulf Region
approximately 12 miles north of Burlington,NC in southwest Caswell County(Figure 1,Appendix B),the
Parcel is hydrologically situated within the USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002030030 of the Cape Fear River
Basin and Jordan Lake's Haw Sub-Watershed(North Carolina Division of Water Quality Subbasin Number
03-06-02). The main hydrologic features include Benton Branch, six unnamed tributaries (UT)to Benton
Branch,and adjacent floodplains.
Directions to the Parcel(from Burlington):
• Take Holt St./NC-62 toward N.Fishe St.—0.1 mile
• Continue on Rauhut St./NC-62—3.2 miles
• Turn left on Union Ridge Rd.—6.0 miles
• Turn left on Stoney Mountain Rd.—2.3 miles
• Stoney Mountain Rd becomes Stoney Creek Mountain Rd.—0.9 mile
• Stoney Creek Mountain Rd.becomes Milesville Rd.— 1.4 miles
• Turn left on Massey Rd.
Parcel Coordinates: 36.278744,-79.419371
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
According to the Final Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities(NCEEP 2009),this watershed should
be targeted for restoration to protect the nutrient-sensitive waters that ultimately drain into the nutrient-
sensitive water supply of Jordan Lake.Overall,the purpose of the Benton Branch Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Bank is to restore, enhance, and preserve riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated
streams onsite.The riparian restoration and enhancement work will improve water quality within the Parcel
and the downstream watershed. The Parcel is located in a region of the state dominated by agriculture and
livestock;restoration of the riparian buffer is expected to result in immediate water quality benefits within
the vicinity of the Parcel through the removal of livestock access to Parcel streams.
Primary goals focus on 1) improving water quality, 2) enhancing flood attenuation and hydrology, 3)
improving aquatic resources, and 4) restoring riparian habitat. Mitigation activities on Site provide
floodplain connectivity, floodplain resistance, stream stability, sediment transport, surface and subsurface
storage/retention, in-stream habitat, riparian habitat and structure, thermal regulation, floodplain
biogeochemical processing,and pollutant filtration,as well as remove sources of pollutants.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The Benton Branch Bank Parcel provides Jordan buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits for
development impacts within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake(Figures 5-6,Appendix B).The
width of the credit generation areas begins at the most landward limit of the top of stream banks or rooted
herbaceous vegetation and extends landward a maximum distance of 200 feet.No buffer mitigation credit
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Page 1
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

is generated in areas with less than 20 feet in width, and no nutrient offset credit is generated in areas that
are less than 50 feet from TOB.Buffer Mitigation credits generated from riparian restoration in non-forested
pasture areas,with a minimum width of 50 feet from TOB,can be converted and transferred from Riparian
Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset Credits and from Nutrient Offset Credit to Riparian Buffer Credits upon
written approval from DWR.A maximum of 10.44 acres of riparian restoration on this Site can be converted
and transferred from Riparian Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset Credits and from Nutrient Offset Credit
back to Riparian Buffer Credits upon approval. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive
written approval from DWR before any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient credit
ledgers.All delivery factors shall be applied to nutrient offset credits before requesting a conversion.
According to the nutrient reduction goals for the Haw River arm of Jordan Lake, the generated nitrogen
credits per acre in the Haw Sub-watershed for riparian restoration on agricultural land is 2249.36 pounds,
and the generated phosphorus credit per acre is 143.81 pounds. The delivery factors applied to this Parcel
are 25 percent for nitrogen and 8 percent for phosphorus(Appendix D). Delivered credits are calculated by
applying the delivery factors and the acreage of riparian restoration to the generated credits per acre stated
above. Based on the asbuilt report, Jordan riparian buffer and nutrient offset (Nitrogen and Phosphorus)
credits for the Benton Bank Parcel are summarized in Table 1 and Figures 5-6(Appendix B).
Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table
14 Digit Watershed ID:03030002030030
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
*Buffer Mitigation Percentage of Mitigation
Width Credit Type Total Area Ratio Full Credit Units
Restoration(located on the right 261.40 ft2 196.05 ft2
TOB-29 ft bank of the upper reach of Benton 1:1 75%
(0.006 ac) (0.004 ac)
Branch[Figure 5A,Appendix B])
TOB-100 ft Restoration 454,860.87 ft2 1:1 100% 454,860.87 ft2
(10.44 ac) (10.44 ac)
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 406,754.51 ft2 203,377.25 ft2
TOB-100 ft (15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6) (9.33 ac) 2:1 100% (4.66 ac)
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 3,385.53 ft2 558.61 ft2
101-200 ft (15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6) (0.07 ac) 2:1 33% (0.01 ac)
TOB-100 ft Preservation 218,084.72 ft2 10:1 100% 21,808.47 ft2
(Rural Subject Streams) (5.00 ac) (0.50 ac)
TOB-29 ft Preservation 254.87 ft2 10:1 75% 19.11 ft2
(Rural Subject Streams) (0.005 ac) (0.0004 ac)
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 680,820.36 ft2
(15.62 ac)
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Page 2
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table (continued)
Nutrient Offset Credits
Generated
**Buffer Mitigation Total Generated Delivery Delivered
Width Credit Type Type Acreage Credits per Credits Factor Credits
Acre
101-200 ft Nitrogen Restoration 0.08 2249.36 179.95 25% 44.99
101-200 ft Phosphorus Restoration 0.08 143.81 11.50 8% 0.92
* TOB-20 ft=Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for no credit.
TOB-29 ft=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 75%credit.
TOB-100 ft=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 100%credit.
101-200' =Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 33%credit.
**Buffer mitigation credits are sought from TOB to 100 feet.Beyond buffer credit generating areas,RS is proposing
nutrient offset credits out to a maximum of 200 feet for a contiguous riparian restoration from TOB to 200 feet where
possible.
The Sponsor will maintain 4 credit ledgers for the Parcel under the Banking Instrument and BPDP: (1)for
buffer restoration mitigation credits in both square feet and acres, (1) for buffer enhancement mitigation
credits in square feet and acres, (1) accounting for nitrogen offset credits in pounds and acres, and (1)
accounting for phosphorus offset credits in pounds and acres.
The Sponsor may elect to use riparian areas for either buffer mitigation credit or wetland mitigation credit,
but not both. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR before
any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer credit ledger. As part of that request, the Sponsor must
provide DWR with a written acceptance letter from the USACE, accompanied by supporting documents,
for any wetlands that they want to be removed from the wetland mitigation bank. Only riparian areas that
fail to qualify to generate wetland credit may be viable for generating riparian buffer credit. Figure 3
(Appendix B)depicts riparian areas that could potentially generate riparian buffer credit if they don't qualify
to generate wetland mitigation credits,and Figure 5(Appendix B)depicts the potential conversion of failed
wetland mitigation credits to riparian buffer credits. Any areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must
meet the performance standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
3.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and annual
plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be performed
as outlined in CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2(Lee et al. 2008). Photos will
be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All planted stems
in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.Detailed qualitative and quantitative monitoring
is proposed for vegetated riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will be visually inspected periodically and
reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report as required. Reporting will include a photographic
record of the Parcel's assets.
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Page 3
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Each monitoring year, RS shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR no later than December 31st.
Quantitative monitoring includes measurements of 20-10x10 meter, permanent vegetation plots (2.0% of
riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the
planted riparian areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be
performed in October of each year;monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.
During the first year, planted vegetation received a cursory visual evaluation to ascertain the degree of
overtopping of planted trees by nuisance species. Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient
offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre
after five years of monitoring.A minimum of four native hardwood tree and shrub species must be present,
with no one species representing greater than 50%of the stems.In addition,appropriate volunteer stems of
native hardwood tree and shrub species may be included to meet the final performance standard of 260
stems per acre upon DWR approval.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion and preservation areas within the conservation easement will
also be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the Site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting,clearing,filling,grading,or similar activities that would negatively
affect the function of the restored buffer.
3.2 Parcel Maintenance
2019 Maintenance Summary;
Lack of surviving planted stems in and around the upper portions of UT-3 (Plot 13), UT-2 and UT-1
were observed during the as-built walkthrough with DWR in July of 2018. The herbaceous layer
consists of abnormally dense knotweed(Polygonum sp.),Japanese stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum),
and ragweed(Ambrosia sp.).These areas were specifically treated in July of 2019 as part of the annual
maintenance program(Table 7,Appendix C).
Based on field observations and Yr. 1 (2018) monitoring data, RS implemented replanting of target
areas(UT-3 around Plot 13,UT-2,and UT-1)at an approximate density of 400 stems per acre. Species
planted and their quantity are detailed in Table 5 of Appendix C. RS Staff performed the replant in
March of 2019.
2020 Maintenance Summary;
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
May 18&26,2020 and June 24,2020
Multiflora Rose,Privet,Sweetgum,Tree-of- Two easement fence repairs due to falling
Heaven,Cattail,Japanese Stiltgrass,and trees/limbs
Fescue
After observing the Site during the monitoring year and re-visiting the areas that did not meet Yr. 3
(2020) success criteria, RS believes vegetation at the Site performs significantly better than what is
shown from the permanent vegetation monitoring plots. This was observed by IRT members during
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Page 4
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

their site visit for the 404/401 mitigation. All parties agreed during that site visit that containerized
trees should and would be planted in low-density areas with thick fescue coverage (along UT 1 and
easement edge of UT-6). Planting in monitoring plots was determined to be okay if noted in the 2021
monitoring report.
RS is working on a planting plan, including species type, quantity, and location. Before any replant
activity occurs,RS will work with DWR staff on approving the additional planting.
4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., JM Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson,
J.B. Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US
Geological Survey,Reston,Virginia.
Jordan Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, and
15A NCAC 02B .0295
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Level 1-2 Plot Version 4.2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality
Plan. Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=2eddbd59-b382-4b58-
97ed-c4049bf4e8e4&groupld=38364. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources,Raleigh,North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP 2009). Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online).Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=
864e 82e 8-725c-415e-8ed9-c72dfcb55012&groupld=60329
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:
Third Approximation.North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,Division of Parks and Recreation,
NC Department of Environment,Health,and Natural Resources.Raleigh,North Carolina.
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Page 5
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix A.
Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.Project Contacts Table
Table 4.Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity/Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA January 22nd,2018
Parcel Protection via conservation easement NA December 8th,2015
Easement Assignment to Land Trust NA August 17th,2017
Cattle exclusion/fence construction NA March 2018
Planting NA March 14th,2018
As-Built Data Collection NA March 5th—23rd,2018
As-Built Report Submittal NA December 2018
Year 1 (2018)Monitoring October 2018 December 2018
Year 2(2019)Monitoring October 2019 December 2019
Year 3(2020)Monitoring October 2020 November 2020
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Firm POC &Address
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Bank Sponsor Restoration Systems,LLC Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer: Axiom Environmental,Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC 27603
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Construction Contractor: Strader Fencing Inc 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring,NC 27592-7756
Mary-Margaret McKinney;252.482.8491
Planting Contractor: Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton,NC 27932
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Seeding Contractor: Land Mechanics,Inc. 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring,NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection& Axiom Environmental,Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
Annual Monitoring 218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC 27603
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 4: Project Baseline Information &Attributes Table
Project Information
Project Name Benton Branch
County Caswell
Project Area(acres) 33.14
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) Latitude: 36°16'33.3"N,Longitude: 79°25'26.3"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030002 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030002030030
DWQ Sub-basin 03-06-02
Project Drainage Area,Total Outfall(miles) 9.06 mi2
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <5%
CGIA Land Use Classification Pasture and Forest Land
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix B.
Figures
Figure 1. Site Location& Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figures 3 and 3A-3f. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Figures 5A and 5B.Credit Determination(Changes from BPDP to As-built)
Figure 6. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

�Yali[ �•:Illc�
A, L. -��-- J •_" 9 '� CRa' 1. .. i_eas6urg • .57 cm oro��
,,C
I� �` �'' � Bank Parcel Location ��
T A �r. ._•,5 vrt'` '` - USGS 14-digit HUC
aigolik
,� 1.
03030002030030
Noun m pp
/- •t EC ■. I� 1587 Massey Road
we •
. _ yfl1�. Elon, NC 27244
•
;on Cc �TInfO•flak•
Jkx am Env ronmenia�,inc.
�� * 136.278744°N, 79.419371°W
}F 1
.1 �.I --_ '_ �ih 't Siony ^F- y
Belews Creek Clerk Pounta inrospect Hilt •• a% '' Prepared for:
ILO[ •
- -�Y Stoke le •\ rr' F;IL +, _-_
Sedlrn:.1 Pc ....././ci
I > (t. F6 1 r • �F •• t 'yip; S
% i
":a ..�- _ - •Ira�»an:
ee. w•rl a egwn i' u, ,,. , r III tiA") r ., - N i `-!
k Ridge -.F,yM1 .. 1i • � .. k urnar' RESTORATION
if i 1 • ; / r7,4:4•14„.
SYSTEMS LLC
...:. A.•
re Ns.
` r r " 1. _ t i :: ,_:
"rgwn ,. �. �:, Project:
171
• sville tiihso„v:.:e ' 5):
earl n9r.,n a' '..'� 5 BENTON BRANCH
_ Efland •
- "',S-�'�+-.. .�'; BANK PARCEL
.. - � _• Greerr•.r. o - -) ''�` Hilistiorough C
_ Sedalia l•�fliils�n _Graham ❑cc�ric`ec'-�•e
r 1.1ocr,-�•, n� NIS
Le:e R�»qe Aex Psi
� flak' ship, • ;' Caswell County, NC
i
Ipilloill-.E.— -,71
1''P
a.= -r..»La.,.., ><„lip 5 :n,�, r.� Title:
. ' i Sit, 744?. Jameet. S • .
.�-- Durham . SITE LOCATION
s•:- �4 i : 8Fa ir \r' = ° r, L•" "� AND
i :41h
'Ir.•naant,arcen = unlni �r :�1 SERVICE AREA
- rr.• a�+r - e-, e Cane freel14
_
1if .....'
7,4,� I:n: f
�'- Nppi� -__•_ �It Notes:
cnape,H,u
''Z'arce ' -.F. -w'• 41110 1 j • ., »I'a" carr:oro - 1.Background Imagery Source:
lie
zee E C` `► ` DeLorme World Basemap
Fj (2014)
if
•
_._,. ../ • .--- ' ) .
) ( ..-__• .
.. sue- ii-F �•$1111111k.4
- !�y�fr-Yrill•,�
,c3 RandMfrran •
r , • ry vt t ..; .7 } tit' .- ..
f \ i___
S t I i ,v sra '.• ,P Gary,
w0;
9 'fy.Threelriat �eph .Cf;i.,.' r d•NounlAb ;;,,,,,,cii ��144
` -` c fall, '•'': '�°.1=':• -- il Drawn by: KRJ
=- ekCreek� I� Fnnkrimille e� s ��� Date: AUG 2016
_. - _ Hamseur - =Hickory-- -_.� •t
_ _ Sher CHy Mountain —� S
� -\ a - I�Ills[71�rn �.i1' .
• Asheboro : •
Scale: 1:3500
yll r5ily Ci •dpsl
i11 4Z1 _ _ '" f Project No.: 16-017
Legend Y d
PAat \ I, u J r }
Jordan Lake 14-digit USGS HUCs 359 �M¢anteln 1 t
I �_ • I 1 Yell,Springs FIGURE
�I Parcel Service Area- Haw River Subwatershedfi. h°'�
7•
Haw River Subwatershed ,� �� Saar c Ned;IL''' M• r-
n �� dG r .3:2 c!:
New Hope Creek Subwatershed y� ' ' R��no�
Ixe
n.'1 �Y R.•ions} Fuqua'i i'
0 5 10 20 30 40 i►- I — _
Miles °rr .. Ce eeek Copyright:©2014 DeLorme
- l / , t -

iF
N
i'. A
_.
u
,.-- w 4._.,. ', i _,... _ .. _ �._._ ._ Aram Env ronmenia� Inc.
'•'-go .
. -
yl___
,,, --
_ ¢ '� _.__ —
Prepared for:
•
Rs
f; ''-' '..,7- • , A � •
< 018 ' '� a
C s': � • w
,�r� w y', sr-+'. RESTORATION
,. sr:.. A `• �C �< „ < ` SYSTEMS LLC
s� >r104( �F�'r '•
iiir
` ,a ► Project:
` ' . ': ,,. BENTON BRANCH
•. - • •f y y' 6 3 , ' BANK
.: ram;x ' + : �' �''; ,r �.. t. ;' ' :x ; PARCEL
-,,,,, 074fardittirisit, . .,._ 4 F.1
IF 1410
4,, i..,, .,, „,= 4 . \ .4 ' 8
N; , �, �: •. j7--,- .,. Caswell County, NC
A x '.. r'-;C '• - .r
'f
" o° I,` �. f x. Title:
-,,.4.,....3„.(e ; . ..„
41„ _
..i.„.„.:„ (
,...,
,.e...* ,e0,
*''' . . - -' - 23—ei .— ' ._ ::-. :::-,,,:.,_•]...'„,1
; ; �< a n; r �� I ,e' CURRENT
f 4,- CONDITIONS
tig3
ray PLAN VIEW
10,-iiiii*i—) ''...4.,,,•oti25.--.
; .•r..•,. s'A.',.
4.
f F.;-4 s- „'4. . �.4.f' �. w%rAtiv t, dd `
Ailir
a y• i.: =: s •' 4: , . ¢'. — .. �._ . t ' . Drawn by:
-r ,.., • • e. 4 +; r;4 'r ,`' '20•. -- ,+ g ., .' , .r Date:
i .C,`''•_ hen N,w y' _
•}; ?'
u ,': �. "' 3: ;+ y Scale:
,Ra 1 ,1� ..J • R ,
6
/� +iil ' 4W-;.,. '•: ,+ '''' Project No.:
J s,: •7
16-017
1 fill . ::. =`�"}' ' Legend
114
• - ; •,{ _ Benton Branch Easement=33.12 ac FIGURE
cr.,.
it egs `:i .: ttf:,4., `: Stream Channel
f� •:,..- w ?. ,,.:
.r. - f•.• ,I, _.F.Rw• -• ;° CVS Plots2
,,
4,
r� `•'= r; *� .' ,:.;. ' ;c. Temporary Vegetation Transects
41
I. 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet

NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is r - �. _- - "r. r _ :_`,' --' FI • • r
given in areas with buffer width of less ..a!? ... f !n �. • - _ _ . _ I`_ • _ t..t .
than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient - ,� i ? , :, 2 ° •
offset credit is given in areas with : �' .•� - ::. ': •
.• ..:..
buffer width less than 50 ft. . -_ ,' . , :"-`'1 *-- "
NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS: ___ _ ___ Figure 3A A iom Enwrorumema�,inc.
TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and r"�l •
-
therefore qualifies for no credit. R� __ .1 -
TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a • Masse ' ` Prepared for.
minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit. . . �.' ; ,r
I Figure 3D ' :-:-:-.... - I �" ��.
TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a :::,b '4 # I '.� ;' #` -' ,
minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft '7-7I _ '•: •.
from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit. --_ __ -
•
1. 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a • RESTORATION
minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft y . MILwilille SYSTEMS I LLC
. from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. • c`. 1 i " Benton Branch
. `,. 4ir. - . r f,'fi
' ` f' : z <'n�.. y�} L" , • •
Project:
l}
: _ • r - - lil .- fir- _ -. +
: � .
-ti� , i ,.�. BENTON BRANCH
▪.; 5:� ., . ' _ BANK PARCEL
•
,SPr.-'▪ :'•• me . • •
µ
I- &I • • .. All
11111
Caswell County, NC
•
{fY. (b, : . '-' ' fir ..m .. © r — -
41: �- . .4L a' A: Title:
"• (..;*Figl_Pl _ • .,4, , •a., ler! \ . .. . . .
i;. :t;i:r,.-4CI 1 ' 0) -. * eiCREDIT
\ DETERMINATION
•
,. • x UT-4
. irc ` ,."' - ryr '- Figure 3B Notes:
A-
LA. .4 *, ' k-', : . 01 1.Background Imagery Source:
. ,•,K, .+ 2014 aerial photography
i { UT-4A . provided by the NC OneMap
Figure 3E • UT-4B program (online, provided by
G,. •- ._ the NC Geographic Information
• ,I. I.. - Coordination Council)
Figure 3F :r' i' Figure 3C
ft— 4.- '
;+ „1 rr • i
• O Legend , •
,, ':
' Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
• .P • I Conservation Easement=33.14 ac ' #} ,f.,
• • • t.i
•
FU _ Stream Channel=3.41 ac . ,# #•r r ~# ;`'. Date: NOV 2018
F •
,- , • _ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft) ' �=x2} ice;":., , ?, :'r1
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) ' . ',•' ' '..•' ,ti . ;}; % ,' ,,ail k: Scale: 1:5000
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) c ,y i;+• } -,. . Project No.: 16-017
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.07 ac(3,385.53 sq ft) r .'
0 Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft)=0.005 ac(254.87 sq ft) ' ..
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) • - FIGURE
uk} •
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) ... e'. , - v' . '..+31 #i.
®Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.56 ac -':}.
Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac J ,_
CVS Plots :3: 3
I—I Previously Fenced Area(fencing removed)
NCDOT Roads "r+ 0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet

•
NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is :, , a ,y � -if. s0.'r X *` -a++r�. _ rr' . .+' '� • f fir' '..:' / • •
y,. ,`'' '; }.
than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient ; �.'. • • �� • ;t.
offset credit is given in areas with fi ' • • • "� .
buffer width less than 50 ft. '. r_�r �• ` •..a •\ " w 4,, , fir.
NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS: ` T i� ." .A.
- \ \ • - \ , Aram Environmenlai,Inc.
TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and ' x yr/
therefore qualifies for no credit. ? ` .� ` \ • \
TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a r \• --- �\ ; ', Prepared for:
minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit. • \ �\
TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a \ \ \ ?�• , / ,1 Rs
minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft • \` • �; Benton Branch
from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit. a `
101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a \ No credit generated by `
minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft buffer less than 20 ft. 1• I /• .4 •" RESTORATION
� v: SYSTEMS I LLC
from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. \\ _ __ • ..
,`
� \ ..� I I Project:
•
/ 'F I I BENTON BRANCH
• \ / ; s," I BANK PARCEL
/ / / /
�4.•_ •.o . / Caswell County, NC
/' ;, A•" / / Title:
/ ; 4. ./ , •., ,...,,,,:-:.::;'.'•.,---
/ CREDIT
Mas / / , _ DETERMINATION
•
sey,Rd / ''' /
.�
/ •
/ ►A-rl.`'-, 1 -/ .... 1,,�_ ' Notes:
••• / / +i- •"++"��� 1.Background Imagery Source:
W / / ; y�' -F'• N aG¢ ` • 2014 aerial photography
r - t .; !�*`• . provided by the NC OneMap
•
/ ' / •,a'„ s N program (online, provided by
i
/ / / / •`.( S the NC Geographic Information
• • / / '• • Coordination Council)
/ ' +'; am/ ')r �.• ,
1 . • I / ✓ ` / . :r f
Leg en d / r' / // / I' :' /. . •
F-1 Conservation Easement=33.14 ac / / / r
/ friffor r �._ Stream Channel=3.41 ac / / t.
/ / • • / aw
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft) / / /
? / )11111 Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) / j .
•
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) I 19 i ./ • / .� I r Date: NOV 2018
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.07 ac(3,385.53 sq ft) ••
I t• /
II
r �?'•= / • Scale: 1:1200
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) I i i /
Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft)=0.005 ac(254.87 sq ft) I 1 Project No.: 16-017
• I_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) r I
I77A Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.56 ac I ! !I ? I )
--•— 50feetfromTOB I I f` FIGURE
• r r
• -••- 100 feet from TOB / / ' I
AP
200 feet from TOB I I
® Constructed BM P Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac ' / I 4 t f 3A
: 1i CVS Plots aµn�< .ram. �!��� ! y`
I , .
QPreviously Fenced Area(fencing removed) I I s
r NCDOT Roads - . 0 100 200 400
a.+� I L.
` \ • Feet

fr
NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is I rr, , N
given in areas with buffer width of less '•.,,. • I ! I '
than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient +�. ' i � I
offset credit is given in areas with '�I i i I "�
/
il buffer width less than 50 ft. ' ii.%
L
NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS: i I \
Jus�am Env�ronmenial,inc.
TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB andI
i !,__ ♦ ���`
therefore qualifies for no credit. 1
TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a • I� •�r �♦ �� :/ Prepared for:
•
A minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft \ \ `
II from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit. �� -�'`� �\��---
E; TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a \ \ •;•�� N ��\ Rs
minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft �.: iA 1
se from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit. \ .� ��` i P' a
101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is aN
4 1..
g ` RESTORATION
minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft \ '�,. .. \ ..'•::r', r:t,f_ SYSTEMS I LLC
from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. !t ��-• �' �� .�/r ',.
II • `___ __- rA ' , Project:
i
\. I \♦ `� r BENTON BRANCH
•
'i ` ♦\ `�� ~ •\ BANK PARCEL
i •
ilk
r i� `�\ �` \ Caswell County, NC
20 \ --- --- �...i
- _♦� �♦ Title:
r , �� f ; -.:° '' `�, _�- --'`� � CREDIT
i v ., --� Benton Branch /
/ ! . DETERMINATION
Notes:
. " .. a.... �{ / / \ 4 `� 1.Background Imagery Source:
/ �!►- `1 2014 aerial photography
/ / / T�• !' t , provided by the NC OneMap
_ _—_._ � �/ f r • '�,- program (online, provided by
y / the NC Geographic Information
g / , Coordination Council)
No credit generated by �' .'i I . .. .._,
Jr •,rw
buffer less than 20 ft. / J•' q / -- . Legend r i
/ tf V .• `
�/ - / r-1 Conservation Easement=33.14 ac ^
� .. I rm Stream Channel=3.41 ac \
�� / _ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft) •\•
i• '' ' Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) ) Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) I Date: NOV 2018
' r • ,i% / ' Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.07 ac(3,385.53 sq ft) I
/ _ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) ` Scale: 1:1 2OO
�` / Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft)=0.005 ac(254.87 sq ft) A - \ \♦ Project No.: 16-017
' ;;,'1' - •
//' _ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) 11111:1<_
/ ��/A Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.56 ac ,
-- - I
/ 50 feet from TOB
FIGURE
��� —••— 100 feet from TOB 1 1. ♦•
' �1 /�� —— 200 feet from TOB \ rl
"' 3 B
:• j� ...... / ������ Constructed BM P Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac \ •
,. . —��� CVS Plots ` v\
•
Q Previously Fenced Area(fencing removed) • ♦\
0 100 200 400 NCDOT Roads \
Feet i. J \ •
NCICGIA

•
•
♦ ' .c�, ;, ,, This area was previously fenced and l��s,.
• livestock had no access;therefore,no _ a •�i` F �4
I
'� \� --- --- — �� ' �%�•i+ ♦� credit is generated 101-200 ft from TOB. ; ,g_ �. '
•
•
'�.,.• 4'• t . `\� -• '�Y .Aro ado �� �', �L / • �.. • • re
•
;" .•\ ` „I. , ♦\ :., Axiom Environmenlai,inc.
♦ t .
Prepared for:
- -\ Y % 1.i • _ ..- r-.s •--_•--' 21 ♦ - '�►
\\ �, r,� r .i' ` , \ ���. ♦ ��` ``_. ri ' ..
RESTORATION
�' I # '\ • •1 ",* : •• r SYSTEMS I LLC
t ...641, r' \:• _ •_ � •
•\
1.
49 la. :�'f . . Project:
Legend 1 '' `♦ �\ \ " • BENTON BRANCH
—�Conservation Easement=33.14 ac I 1 `� y BANK PARCEL
_ Stream Channel=3.41 ac I I 1 1 I �_-- �I\ •:51t5 Rom " r.•\
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft) F .` i• •••4- . '. ?Ix;.'
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) I \ I I Caswell County, NC
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) \ 1 i '/! /' f \ NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is Title:
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft) 0.07 ac(3,385.53 sqft 1 1 ,'�r 23 / given in areas with buffer width of less
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) • 1 ` 7.' ' ` \ \ than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient
Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft)=0.005 ac(254.87 sq ft) \ `\ / ♦'♦',N.
offset credit is given in areas with CREDIT
• buffer width less than 50 ft.
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) ` ♦•♦ \ DETERMINATION
�� Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.56 ac I•/ ,
1
--•—• 50 feet from TOB \ • �♦\ NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS:
— - 100 feet from TOB • �. I 1 TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and
` r Notes:
-- 200 feet from TOB \ '' i I \ therefore qualifies for no credit.' 1.Background Imagery Source:
CVS Plots •i /� , ( \ TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a • 2014 aerial photography
Q Previously Fenced Area(fencing removed) / �' ; \ minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft provided by the NC OneMap
1 I program (online, provided
r . \ from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit. the by
I ♦ \ the NC Geographic Information
/) 24 I ' 7" \♦ TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a • Coordination Council)
il. X minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft
//� \ \♦ 1 from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit.
r•k 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
� ' •� minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
/ /. ,,' from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit.
A
i •/ --. �• ,I r F \``� • •.•
�-R Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
/' I' v® f' \ • • '•
Date: NOV2018
' ` 25 ` ,.:. '. j •is Scale: 1:1200
1 ',: ?" , ':� r Project No.: 16-017
fif,Fer4-i".,"---`7-i': . i••-r ..1.,..1.; : -.
FIGURE
. '... -.,'...P.- g-L:.:.-J, .. y,. ;:..-, ,, . .i.'_.. -,-,'. .." ''''''7, ..,.. '..g.:.,-,'..,'./.._;.I. T7,f:;:, '..;.:"..: --.:''...':.1"../ .9.- ,...4.-1';':. ';" i. ''''-':":,-!:":/:--...r.i..-1.'-41.'t.14:.4. -::-_:....4'. •
litna,
= ... -1'
AK. r '• • E . . 7 " .. ' ' :;. ..: . 3C
. ._ . ,.., • . ... .... •• .
lit::
:,:.1
z / r I r
. ° r .• ` ( .r
•
.. -- -. - .• . y, A.:: : f ', .r• . '# ".... 0 100 200 400

Legend `f- i b. s. N
F—I Conservation Easement=33.14 ac -" ;e,/"" • `
{
_ Stream Channel=3.41 ac ! <-f"�.ti f' f' • �••, i
•
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft) ' 44. •r
•
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) !. /-:• • •
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) f • \ • '
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.07 ac(3,385.53 sq ft) • r /
��•r _ \ / \ Axiom Environ,oenial,Inc.
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) ,. \ `
�/f `
Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft)=0.005 ac(254.87 sq ft) \ / \
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) \• �// \\ Prepared for:
® Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.56 ac 9. ,
f
. .
--•—• 50 feet from TOB ,'�
••— 100 feet from TOB e / ` �" \ ,) Rs
.,
•
-- 200 feet from TOB 1 •-• _ _ /� \
_ Constructed BM P Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac r • , /".
` \ \
` RESTORATION
CVS Plots •
Cb SYSTEMS I LLC
•Q Previously Fenced Area(fencing removed) -
1 J I • ‘ .+�"j,.' T I
.
' t )1 \ • / / ,•ice.
1 �� • �r' •- •S `\ .` �► q �' i.� r I• Project:
•
f "4:r 1 �\ • , ' BENTON BRANCH
\ ` \ r ���,, P. BANK PARCEL
- ',♦.'pia�``. ; \ 1 1 v` x 1 •: I ` ,.
/ • /' ����� \ \ 1 \ ' / ; Caswell County, NC
♦ / ,
\ \ / .. ' i22'.. .%444 Title:
s 7,
. i
L. / \ I / / . <� I. �/ :f• CREDIT
�\ \ \ /lI 1. i I , ; • / / DETERMINATION
i / t .-r+
� ,- fr ,_4" P.''.. :, •• : . . ...
,N ''� \ 1 �� ' i' � /' '/ / / x'•• ` • . f Notes:
•
1 I i i :/ii,
• t \1 / ; / i 1.Background Imagery Source:
` 1 '_J ; / / 2014 aerial photography
i / i ' /� provided by the NC OneMap
\, / / i , :�' program (online, provided by
1 I � /,' / / - the NC Geographic Information
,•'; / / Coordination Council)
•
I ' • / ' . • / NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is �~r
1
I < �• , / i f ! ,/� given in areas with buffer width of less
1 + • — ) ! // than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient
1 r /' J 6 / offset credit is given in areas with
/
f•
! �• � • �� / ' • F• / / buffer width less than 50 ft.
112L.......1.........._ •
r '�, / �' r Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
` �\ ! �/ / NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS:
t \� ice'• . .. `''--.. • ,- ...I.:
/ TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and Date: NOV 2018
1 \ \ • / therefore qualifies for no credit. Scale: 1:1200
`.• ." __ �' / TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
1 p `" `\ \� s�,' ; minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft Project No.: 16-017
\ ` ; / from the TOB,and ualifies for 75% credit.
\ \ I / q
Y \\ �.• .: ) from the ft=TOB,and width is contiguous from TOB, is a
minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft FIGURE
\ \ `\ \v ��R •'1 .:tl, - • i / o
\�
/ ` from the and qualifies for 100/° credit.
1 �\ t` , �\ `: .r'. \ 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
",' ,' / ,.\ minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft •
m .�, ^ from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. 3 D
\ . ..,
S.
.,- ,... -,. ... . •..,- •
`\ X III `\` • \_.4 . \ 0 100 200 400• eet
wrrs

•
Wrr.i. /::.%•••.-..;:,....V. . ..... • .:•..- .:•• •
\ fry ► • ` ,
0 \ IMS2 • UT-1
.. „... ,. ..._ .• .•. ••• • • r.,.,:, ../. ••,•//://e.1. I
''-' -- "(00 1 ..i, .
.,
\ •\ \ 7 •• .. .i.:-.. • • : -f.1::•'.. • ' ..:".:". // '/ . �\ r•a ' Axiom
a m Env ronmen I Inc.
4
•
/7/2(..// / . . ..... .• ".r *•er-;A• .
, \ ,// Prepared for:•'A;'.•: . - .
\ \,\40..
• ...L. • _ ••,..,. • . .,..., .. I.. .
\ . ,..._...„..\ •Rs
li 3 \ .. ..: ...• f
..
•
\ \
\ ♦ \ , ,or . ' \I •+. , • ..,_ ..,. f --, •. : .
•
\ RESTORATION
•
• `•
\ • \ \\ 1 I :• V. SYSTEMS I LLC
• \\ l` \ `i / I i- I I • f. Project:
• I i 01 / / I 1
\ \ r
XIII
. . 4. BENTON BRANCH
1 Ii i I l "* r : �• ,, :1 bi
�, BANKPARCEL
/ \ f,
/'• / / i.: �`' `I c:. b �• Caswell County, NC
10 �• •Y ,� •,-?,.. � Title:
. :,. •f ;�
•
l \ \ ,.,!wt..',..•t !
. / ,..'',4.; 4' ;,' �.•-► CREDIT
\ �. • „� f: ;�,.. `C.. :`t �J DETERMINATION
s.
O.
. \ • ♦ / • §y.,. ; ' ; ''�. Notes:
\ N• \ �' / y ' .; /.0 "': 7 -~ i-' 1.Background Imagery Source:
♦ /• •• • % • 2014 aerial hoto ra h
\ • •
\• 1 i / •
r.'. • R- ,� • provided by the NC OneMap
• • program online, provided b
�: �.
\ \•
• �fy �.••f } �=+ the NC Geographic Information
\ \ ♦.` — ��I I .;.` ; .¢-:.• ' • 4 ". is,. .1101V : Coordination Council)
-_ _ • \ \ I I NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is
• I I •�f : :."; *. _ : .;-' •
:.., given in areas with buffer width of less 1
\ •• I \ ,• ; .? ?:`9,' ': , than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient
\ I •\ • t , I offset credit is given in areas with
Legend \ / / f ' .. • ti - ' buffer width less than 50 ft.
;� :' "_ -- Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
Conservation Easement=33.14 ac ; � '' ��r� �Y
r� 1 .° / NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS:
Stream Channel=3.41 ac I j ' f .+ / �.� ~+,� �y=a Date: NOV 2018
<*� ••. TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and
- Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft) I I t\
\ therefore qualifies for no credit. Scale: 1:1200
- Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) f ,•, TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) \ \ f\ minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft Project No.: 16-017
- Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.07 ac(3,385.53 sq ft) \ `' f • from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit.
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) \ •
i'• ° \\ l:,' TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream TOB-29 ft 0.005 ac 254.87 sqft) ' ���, >w. ♦' 4.- ' ." •; " '• - '',--.•� minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft FIGURE
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) \\ - • •-at.I k.•'} - '' v LLet from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit.
jr Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.56 ac • , • I. ; '. 101 200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
--•-• 50 feet from TOB ' P.:• • $ . ,.,, : f.,Y'Y' 11r`' minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
, ,—' :.`; ESQ; yr from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. 3E
100 feet from TOB r r •
200 feet from TOB 'i•'.. py •�'� ��. :,•" .i:" 4 . � .„ :_ .. •.• f � �;�� ,. �.' •�i��.::!. :!„`.•�•�f'�"'
CVS Plots � . y/ cr, F+ 0 100 200 400
;i r 4 +� " .•` ,`. Feet

a to , ,. • ,\
- r ' l.; it \
i 1•1 • \ ..': '-: A
• F+'4', j? . • ', ,-,- .i . ,;, r \I — J ' \ �' Amm Envirommenial,inc.•
,...-7 . • ..., ,,.• .........,. _ . •,Is .
••• .. ..„.... .,.
•
■ .r•} ti rr ��� • Prepared for:
4.*
: .L., •
i!
,..
:::,.,... Te...„.,
..7 .
.- ••_.
17
.•- • • • _ , • \ \\
"1#1. S
' . • ..y• ,• ' .,... • -• ,i.., f .. .' 1,4 ,. -. - .0. .it.,, .,.. . ,,,. ,,, ..
4
. „/i:...:., ,'.,..., :,.
°. x ,.:k,..!,../ -4- -: : .,. ,- r \ RESTORATION
K , II'
,t,i.;.,.l
....'.-i..„.1t....4:.7
`F _.Y' ,�` d t. i `; " ; `.. \ SYSTEMS LLC
N.
,; • ' ' .•:,.
•
•
•
! ' [ Project:f
• • �"� `' f. I /. 1• sy`' F,* 1 �. '' \ BENTON BRANCH
y -
4;iif* rs '., '' � • ti •. ' j ; �. I r t ,, �.. . `�' BANK PARCEL
7. r
' �' /
' . '� r • 4*, t'..y .,,< a •rit4I` *. e ;4 J •,ri- <�- .., • , • t I Caswell County, NC
.J . . : I.•• • _• I '1!k 4r • /; 'xy . / J Title:
', .+I'. ,I•• •r. •7 • 4--4,-• P••• • • •J' - Al -:\-
•y, •'•,r ,•' �lr • •..� •; � {' 4", i i ! J F ': �' �! ' / .� :I. CREDIT
:k i., -� j` .. ., . . ;24 . •. i
,/ k. / DETERMINATION
c.
:i 'i i+• '.� At .. ¢ •I • :• T .%� it r' r .•l; I. es' / s•'• / f t e
'�, r. `je 4, I ,. r< Y . .: I •J 4.. Notes:
r • • s,r �� 1
r - k.3r j,r A' .- \'�.frr•40.-• i, / -,,.,y� •Jr •I� 7 / - / -- z
••. r ,r' �' '_ �-:��~•• 1.Background Imagery Source:
ti _��# {. x J / !r ; .1. 2014 aerial photography
•�Y.y k �- t. '?' ( °ti• / �° ~ provided b the NC OneMa
Tf. J ^y F a. .� _ e • } p +r ,.4Ft.. 1 , t •
)1., J ti.• P Y P
• yk,.'7 .' J rYr �� ':y•,:.., 3 j t program (online, provided by
• _ of
r I • • • rp /• �. ,�, - - the NC Geographic Information
4. d .of - -'J`^ •1 k �' •,S ,•f • �/ ,•r'• r: I T;`� k Coordination Council)
•
•
_•, • .•'fit y - :1 •,• ' .•w NOTE: No riparian buffer credit is
f, • , • { I /Ili
a •
/
.. `f• �;'� "�' \. rI
;%,.x '.. _ '1... Ti.:. '• r ;;y F.f c• I I �' I given in areas with buffer width of less
,,. /'; x •s'y '`,r., .'.�� ". . ;a ,I I than 20 ft. Additionally, no nutrient
. 1,'' , ,.:r .'�' . 4., :'• • fe • I offset credit is given in areas with
�� I buffer width less than 50 ft.
'v.v./ .e. ! I
Legend , . '• �.,�•- • l
—�Conservation Easement=33.14 ac ' &.9 •y.;;' • • • j I I —��" Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
./ VN / I NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS: Date: NOV 2018
Stream Channel=3.41 ac - • ' • u TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft)=10.44 ac(454,860.87 sq ft)
14 ,/ / therefore qualifies for no credit. Scale: 1:1200
_ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft)=0.006 ac(261.40 sq ft) _ / TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)=9.33 ac(406,754.51 sq ft) / Project N o.: 16-017
1.
�' minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft
_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft)=0.07 ac(3,385.53 sq ft) y4 fr / from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit.
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft)=5.00 ac(218,084.72 sq ft) �! � - / TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
� '' ;` ,- / minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft FIGURE
Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft)=0.005 ac(254.87 sq ft) �sr
'r"�4 • ''N' • r' / from the TOB,andqualifies for 100% credit.
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.08 ac(3,600.73 sq ft) °`'' " 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a
® Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=4.34 ac +'• 4`' I• :_*
� � A.,, 3 F
-- - 50 feetfromTOB �,� minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
• '- ` +: / from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit.
—••- 100 feet from TOB .�•.. ' /
200 feet from TOB k • ''•:�'/J ^S //JQ"yM�.10::.' ?.•.0�
t:7A:
0 100 200 400
CVS Plots � �� ' x :. Feet
-.,r-r,-a�-•---,...,s•,vrw. .•rr sasr. ._... ter. r.7. "i.•' .r -'..G� .':.....

14 Digit Watershed ID:03030002030030
NC Potential Conversion of Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
•
r Buffer Percentage of Mitigation
I Width Credit Type Total Area Mitigation Ratio Full Credit Units
TOB-100 ft Restoration 93,993.42 ftZ 1:1 100% 93,993.42 ft2
(2.16 ac) (2.16 ac) • �. '.
I.] 101-200 ft Restoration 28,354.37 ft2 1:1 33% 9451.46 ft2
(0.65 ac) (0.22 ac) - _
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(15A 44,955.54 ftZ 22,477.77 ftZ �� % t..
TOB-100 ft 2:1 100% .. -.
NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6) (1.03 ac) (0.52 ac) Y
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(15A 5999.15 ft 999.86 ftZ is '.� Axiom Env tOn rllai,inc.
101-200 ft NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6) (0.14 ac) 2:1 33% (0.02 ac) ill X � °.' \\
Preservation 15,837.59 ft2 1583.76 ftZ x ' 1—
TOB-1oo ft 10:1 100%
(Rural subject Streams) (0.36 ac) (0.04 ac) //���.,,,� \ •1 '.\ 1 -':.•.�'- - Prepared for:
.:.
I, Total Potential Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 128,506.27 ft2 LAX!/> - _ _-. .- • \� •.• 1 -
F 2.96ac -- \ '`f.,i I
�•
� ' / Rs
/•/ ''
_ �' /' RESTORATION
k ' IMIlNi. ad / Benton Branch 'w • SYSTEMS LLC
Il •.' �: i. `, `'. • ;. , Project:
•
I.
as �_
z rye" �l. , 1 ,. '. V; * .ate �-- ,. n ,` . BENTON BRANCH
1 ff<„ /�• r / s i*yt
' �• �— y- , ':'. '.. .. BANK PARCEL
701.'1.. '.'/4•••" -t' ...- •
'Pr
\ ` ; @ ..: ? r..' 1 1' �4s ; �-' ' Caswell County, NC
\ A s i yr. :,> ,. Y \ :— '. ),- k Y
• ,. �`}.. + '\� '! �( �'� .y xY.: .�.,"� , .F r;,��;; 'a '��►'_ _'• 3' ,r, Title:
1 �� �. Z. re ) '� 'x ° k ;• POTENTIAL
• A ..� 1 • __ i,. I' ! 4. 4, 'J 1. ''i —� �� T.`J` . s d*44�1 •.:-;'r ' CONVERSION
r •'N .. :.:4. ,• .`ff > 1 , I i .; �' x t' ��` / ~' ': ': OF WETLAND
'j ; l • ../ i. • .. , •_ :: .. _J �, .�` <: ,:s� CREDIT TO
�� ,r ': ` lam i. •; ` � +�. _ _ ��• �r t _ -�� � ' RIPARIAN BUFFER
• \ \1. a .� a ; ' b CREDIT
iii .. \ •.....•"...1 ,--i i /,-1: • E.:- "',, , • ' , %, .' i i .-.-__-----.---*..... , \ .• \... .‘ )'�d
\ • / t • �; , p; ,y. ,'. -�; . i �� l Notes:
�a r '. \ v
` (c": r 1.Background Imagery Source:
rl 1 \ A 1-�ii . 4: •y r' / , �• 1;`, \ 2014 g aerial photography
y... \ ,liY r c s M .' , \ \ provided by the NC OneMap
i.'•'g, '�' x. .071„ •' '�'^ program (online, provided by
-.t.'.� r.�.:.407# ;'.°.,A:.,',`,"•yy ,.',� ,. y the NC Geographic Information
yr� _ "•, • ,� • yF - Coordination Council)
" /' IV;i'^,` e ,... _.,,. ...E-5.$.g'!f
4.
.��`f�,,� ',' yypp ', LS i85"a
�� \ NOTE: Riparian areas that fail to qualify ;-
to generate wetland mitigation credit may be ,
'-'1 :.; e.. - - Legend
`:' viable for generating riparian buffer crdit. Any o
.�
areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must g1.•. .w • Conservation Easement=33.12 ac
' meet standards detailed in 15A NCAC 0213.0295. .. Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
/ I P; 's1►�. y+.ak. Restored Stream Channel=3.53 ac
y/ . 1
/ ` / r•..:':..;,.;;ti 'a .,,,, _ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft) Date: APR 2018
f : 1 ( `�/ NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS: a: Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)
Il' _ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft) Scale: 1:5000
• i f -, TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and Project No.: 16-017
l therefore qualifies for no credit. = Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Streams(TOB-100 ft) 1
---'/ I ., TOB-29 ft Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a `'J _ Nutrient Offset CreditArea(101-200ft)
// t. ' :k'r:. minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac
''` L' from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit. -' `"! '. NCDOT Roads g FIGURE
el
'+ TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB is a "3' `'4i.1 • --•- 50 feet from TOB
minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft �'- • . ' —
;'...'e':- s yr 7 - 100 feet from TOB
,. from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit. ;. 443-4
, - °--'` -- 200 feet from TOB 4
"' 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a - '
:t
Nminimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
F from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. $. 0 500 1,000 2,000
4. . A. Y ,0-4 R.. Feet
fir, OA.i ,try
,�":'�: �'• �-� -;x��.��y:�� " jam. �� - .. �

1.
�As-Builtw - I - -# N
d BPDP •
y��� i ,,, , X II
{e• - •-L-
. CDtp...‘ Ar‘ i!Pi 41114
.`-4, �, _ Aram Environmental,inc.
' ��
' 1 •J Prepared for:
",.#1. S
/ ® N - / /�
/ •' / Riparian buffer and nutrient offset credit amounts • ' / N //
/ -3( changed slightly due to a shift in the easement and the ..-,+i.• \
/ >//t/" . _ addition of wetland mitigation within the old pond beds. \ / RESTORATION
• 'S // SYSTEMS LLC
/ The easement shift was a result of the final, post- - - \
/ construction surveyed easement and did not result in "- •, \N./
any changes to the stream and wetland credits as Project:
- --••—••_ proposed in the mitigation plan and constructed. —••
+•' - / �.• Additionally, there was an oversight in the BPDP where /
"' / \ all riparian buffer restoration and enhancement was BENTON BRANCH
r /'' '(� given full credit(rather than 50%). During as built, it was /..
BANK PARCEL
•
decided to pursue nutrient offset credit in the areas 101 /
__ 200 ft where buffer vegetation was restored.
,�� ��. •
. . . . .
. .
/' Caswell County, NC
i .. .
•
.. .\ / \ \- -
/' Title:
�t r l . i / ,r i •, .` /•• CREDIT
T �` ��' \\ 1 /' . R �y I \` DETERMINATION
y , Y fisr �C)' / (CHANGES FROM
`.` 1\ 1 • r / .� I \ I\ •
i f +� /• BPDP TO AS-BUILT)
•
' 1 .' / '~ • I / /r"'�. .• \ % / • r '. , /' Notes:
`I ir r tf "t •• , `1 _ l r1._ /Ar,. / y T �ff 1.Background Imagery Source:
• \� UT 2 ; _ I/ U 1-2 / 2014 aerial photography
1 1 .` I • f• `� .. I 4/ w I provided by the NC OneMap
i \ • :�•:I ' .4W,. 1 I /� / \ I I program (online, provided by
P' • • 1 \ 1 ♦• �_ { 1 I the NC Geographic Information
, I I 1 ` r 4 `• I 1 \ I Coordination Council)
."tve, .4 - ..\• / </F...:.0 \ .‘ \ I -lb : 1
aoligic . .., \i \
f -
• i //i; / I •'i
fir/ f '' • /. I / / . . F. 'i ,' •i / it
/
•
v 7 •' ' 1, f Ai
v`. l / F�' ��` • f , Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
ti'r a - y. C /7 Date: OCT 2018
//7 , Legend •t*c w .,•
+1- �� y"t`. r 1 = Q Conservation Easement , --• r' ( // Scale: 1:760
1
' - / I I Restored Stream Channel + - - /
'. „' . i ! I / / Project No.: 16-017
` . •3 -4,.'";� :/i _ , Riparian Buffer Restoration(TO B-100 ft) 1
• if. .• • • , •`' +�, r• I .� ' , Riparian Buffer Restoration(TO B-29 ft) I 1
v r, _ - s+ ,• I Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TO B-100 ft) 1 r
4. I • I r. Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft) r _ •- i 1 ,•
"gr FIGURE
•
r•'. �y ! / _ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft) .7 ) %
'� `{ /. _ . • 1 , Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft) �• / y
.+ � I ` ' �i s f - /' 1 / •A _ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft) - i
ti.
• ,_
•
. •
r
+ / / / I I wetland Mitigation Credit Area •" '��� ,/• 5A
/- E• • ' Y / 1 •/ --•- 50 feet from TOB �'✓ / /
•' _ Tr - � ' ,' / —••• 100 feet from TOB / '
..!! 'ti; : 1 .' / / _ / / 0 50 100 200
/ 200 feet from TOB
:�.'', '/ :� j a • �' 7.• Feet

AS-Built •Ir (, -mr N `
BPDP Y
q All w•
•
•
•
' .. .i:, A
4 !J1 l\1
� ..:
.•
AXIOM Env ronmenial,inc.
�^ P .
)y . _` ,� : •. s Prepared for:
.• .
Rs. ,,,,.:. : .
��� �,�` Riparian buffer and nutrient offset credit amounts -----__ y r:
changed slightly due to a shift in the easement and the ��--.,, r, RESTORATION
/ •, addition of wetland mitigation within the old pond beds. ' .- SYSTEMS I LLC
/ ' •,/�s The easement shift was a result of the final, post- '+' �\ r 4,�t:
/ \ / construction surveyed easement and did not result in • • \
// \\ �� any changes to the stream and wetland credits as s \ ,, Project:
\ / stwo \ proposed in the mitigation plan and constructed. •,, �\
✓ \ ,f/ Additionally, there was an oversight in the BPDP where :•'1.„ '•
•
\ BENTON BRANCH
• ' ' all riparian buffer restoration and enhancement was ` - \ BANK PARCEL
r given full credit(rather than 50%). During as-built, it was i: \
.-/./7//
— r decided to pursue nutrient offset credit in the areas 101-
'. ? 200 ft where buffer vegetation was restored. \ f ' _
/ \ • f:.' \ Caswell County, NC
. /7. .1;,,,•-:" \ \ • • \ Title:
• / r // �,... \ x, • 4 \ \ ` CREDIT
/• ,/ � ``'� • . '� '� i` \ .a DETERMINATION
/ \ {.\. 1 (CHANGES FROM
/ y .,' fir' 1 BPDP TO AS-BUILT)
�/ f I •
I f /'' i / I Notes:
/ - • 1
• /' I / / € I 1.Background Imagery Source:
• i �'<'r;;• ate.
• �/ ! / / / / i 2014 aerial photography
/ / / -• •• / e• I provided by the NC OneMap
// i �/ •r { program (online, provided by
i 1 ; ', : I qr /• / ir
/ the NC Geographic Information
/ . Coordination Council)
I •
r I I I /� -
t 1 c ri ti �/�' `' A
\ / % y \ t\ % UT-1 /_ ' -
1i / I - !
i
l / i f •? '` :011brt
' •_ ;. Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
•
•
i i// ••� - . - • Legend /� /i % ,� - Date: OCT 2018
r 'r 0 1
• Q Conservation Easement / // 141 +k ,-" / - ;� Scale: 1:760
/ / / .'i r
' -- "' r- r Restored Stream Channel
/ 1 / f / /j� �� Pro ect No.. 16-017
//' _ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft) /, '/ ;;!. /, _
/ � • I' Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-29 ft) / / / /
i' • .• • . Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft) /" / / •
•�/ / / I_ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft) t / / c/ /• ? +~F -_f_r_ _ FIGURE
_ Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-100 ft) / / • l. -' FIGURE
fZC
/.
•! Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Stream(TOB-29 ft) / f I te - .K+-` '
• - _ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft) F / • :f-his/. �'. !
__ �� 5B
/ f//J Wetland Mitigation Crecit Area / _ (y
.' *4.
/J - — 50 feet from TOB /' .1 ` 7� '• •fir
—••• 100 feet from TOB F " .
/' —AI ,__200feetfr0mTOB
% . /' 0 50 Y 100 200
/ . • _-- /i
____•� / _��_ Feet

14 Digit Watershed ID:03030002030030
NC Potential Conversion of Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
•
r Buffer Percentage of Mitigation
I Width Credit Type Total Area Mitigation Ratio Full Credit Units
TOB-100 ft Restoration 93,993.42 ftZ 1:1 100% 93,993.42 ft2
(2.16 ac) (2.16 ac) • �. '.
I.] 101-200 ft Restoration 28,354.37 ft2 1:1 33% 9451.46 ft2
(0.65 ac) (0.22 ac) - _
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(15A 44,955.54 ftZ 22,477.77 ftZ �� % t..
TOB-100 ft 2:1 100% .. -.
NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6) (1.03 ac) (0.52 ac) Y
Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(15A 5999.15 ft 999.86 ftZ is '.� Axiom Env tOn rllai,inc.
101-200 ft NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6) (0.14 ac) 2:1 33% (0.02 ac) ill X � °.' \\
Preservation 15,837.59 ft2 1583.76 ftZ x ' 1—
TOB-1oo ft 10:1 100%
(Rural subject Streams) (0.36 ac) (0.04 ac) //���.,,,� \ •1 '.\ 1 -':.•.�'- - Prepared for:
.:.
I, Total Potential Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 128,506.27 ft2 LAX!/> - _ _-. .- • \� •.• 1 -
F 2.96ac -- \ '`f.,i I
�•
� ' / Rs
/•/ ''
_ �' /' RESTORATION
k ' IMIlNi. ad / Benton Branch 'w • SYSTEMS LLC
Il •.' �: i. `, `'. • ;. , Project:
•
I.
as �_
z rye" �l. , 1 ,. '. V; * .ate �-- ,. n ,` . BENTON BRANCH
1 ff<„ /�• r / s i*yt
' �• �— y- , ':'. '.. .. BANK PARCEL
701.'1.. '.'/4•••" -t' ...- •
'Pr
\ ` ; @ ..: ? r..' 1 1' �4s ; �-' ' Caswell County, NC
\ A s i yr. :,> ,. Y \ :— '. ),- k Y
• ,. �`}.. + '\� '! �( �'� .y xY.: .�.,"� , .F r;,��;; 'a '��►'_ _'• 3' ,r, Title:
1 �� �. Z. re ) '� 'x ° k ;• POTENTIAL
• A ..� 1 • __ i,. I' ! 4. 4, 'J 1. ''i —� �� T.`J` . s d*44�1 •.:-;'r ' CONVERSION
r •'N .. :.:4. ,• .`ff > 1 , I i .; �' x t' ��` / ~' ': ': OF WETLAND
'j ; l • ../ i. • .. , •_ :: .. _J �, .�` <: ,:s� CREDIT TO
�� ,r ': ` lam i. •; ` � +�. _ _ ��• �r t _ -�� � ' RIPARIAN BUFFER
• \ \1. a .� a ; ' b CREDIT
iii .. \ •.....•"...1 ,--i i /,-1: • E.:- "',, , • ' , %, .' i i .-.-__-----.---*..... , \ .• \... .‘ )'�d
\ • / t • �; , p; ,y. ,'. -�; . i �� l Notes:
�a r '. \ v
` (c": r 1.Background Imagery Source:
rl 1 \ A 1-�ii . 4: •y r' / , �• 1;`, \ 2014 g aerial photography
y... \ ,liY r c s M .' , \ \ provided by the NC OneMap
i.'•'g, '�' x. .071„ •' '�'^ program (online, provided by
-.t.'.� r.�.:.407# ;'.°.,A:.,',`,"•yy ,.',� ,. y the NC Geographic Information
yr� _ "•, • ,� • yF - Coordination Council)
" /' IV;i'^,` e ,... _.,,. ...E-5.$.g'!f
4.
.��`f�,,� ',' yypp ', LS i85"a
�� \ NOTE: Riparian areas that fail to qualify ;-
to generate wetland mitigation credit may be ,
'-'1 :.; e.. - - Legend
`:' viable for generating riparian buffer crdit. Any o
.�
areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must g1.•. .w • Conservation Easement=33.12 ac
' meet standards detailed in 15A NCAC 0213.0295. .. Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
/ I P; 's1►�. y+.ak. Restored Stream Channel=3.53 ac
y/ . 1
/ ` / r•..:':..;,.;;ti 'a .,,,, _ Riparian Buffer Restoration(TOB-100 ft) Date: APR 2018
f : 1 ( `�/ NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS: a: Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)
Il' _ Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(101-200 ft) Scale: 1:5000
• i f -, TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and Project No.: 16-017
l therefore qualifies for no credit. = Riparian Buffer Preservation on Rural Subject Streams(TOB-100 ft) 1
---'/ I ., TOB-29 ft Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a `'J _ Nutrient Offset CreditArea(101-200ft)
// t. ' :k'r:. minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac
''` L' from the TOB,and qualifies for 75% credit. -' `"! '. NCDOT Roads g FIGURE
el
'+ TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB is a "3' `'4i.1 • --•- 50 feet from TOB
minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft �'- • . ' —
;'...'e':- s yr 7 - 100 feet from TOB
,. from the TOB,and qualifies for 100% credit. ;. 443-4
, - °--'` -- 200 feet from TOB 6
"' 101-200'= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a - '
:t
Nminimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
F from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% credit. $. 0 500 1,000 2,000
4. . A. Y ,0-4 R.. Feet
fir, OA.i ,try
,�":'�: �'• �-� -;x��.��y:�� " jam. �� - .. �

Appendix C.
Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Woody Vegetation
Table 6. Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7A-B. Temporary Vegetation Transect Data
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Species Quantity 2019 Replant
River birch(Betula nigra) 2550 500
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis) 250 --
Eastern redbud(Cercis canadensis) 1100 --
Silky dogwood(Cornus amomum) 2325 --
Green ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 3900 500
Tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 600 --
Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 3800 --
Black gum(Nyssa sylvatica var.sylvatica) 2000 --
Water oak(Quercus nigra) 2800 --
Willow oak(Quercus phellos) 3000 --
Black willow(Salix nigra) 1225 --
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 550 --
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) -- 250
Black cherry(Prunus serotine) -- 400
White oak(Quercus alba) -- 500
American elm(Ulmus americana) -- 500
TOTAL 24,100 2,650
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 6. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 1500702. Project Name:Benton Branch
Current Plot Data(MY3 2020)
1500702-01-0001 1500702-01-0002 1500702-01-0003 1500702-01-0006 1500702-01-0010 1500702-01-0011 1500702-01-0012 1500702-01-0013 1500702-01-0014 1500702-01-0015 1500702-01-0016 1500702-01-0017
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 7 7 7 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 8 8 8 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 4 4
Carya hickory Tree
Carya glabra pignut hickory Tree 1
Catalpa speciosa northern catalpa Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 3 3 6 1 1 2 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 5
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 2
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 11 11 11 5 5 5 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 16 32 3
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus alba white oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree
Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub
Robinia locust 1
Salix nigra black willow Tree
Ulmus alata winged elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Stem count 14 14 14 10 10 14 6 6 7 14 14 15 10 10 16 14 14 15 7 7 25 0 0 0 3 3 6 4 4 5 9 9 41 12 12 20
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Spec
ies
3 3 3 3 4
4 4
4 5
3 5 3 3 4
2 4
0 0 2 2 4 2 2 3
2 3 6 6 8
Stems per ACRE 566 6 566 6 404.7 404.7 566.6� 242.8 283.3� 566 6 607�404.7 647.5 566.6 566.6 607� 283.3 1012� 0 0 121.4 121.4 242.8 161.9 161.9202.3� 364.2 1659 485.6 485.6 809.4
Color for Density PnoLs=Planted excluded livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planted included live stakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruites
Fails to meet requirements by more thah 10%

Table 6. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 1500702. Project Name:Benton Branch
Current Plot Data(MY3 2020) Annual Means
1500702-01-0018 1500702-01-0019 1500702-01-0020 1500702-01-0021 1500702-01-0022 1500702-01-0023 1500702-01-0024 1500702-01-0025 MY3(2020) MY2(2019) MY1(2018) MYO(2018)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 37 37 38 45 45 45 62 62 62 84 84 84
Carya hickory Tree 4
Carya glabra pignut hickory Tree 1 6
Catalpa speciosa northern catalpa Tree 10 10
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 10 10 10 16 16 16 19 19 19 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 6 6 6 9 9 9 11 11 11 16 16 16
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 4 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 6 4 4 6 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 3 49 3 3 3 29 29 97 33 33 38 33 33 36 41 41 41
Juglans nigra black walnut Tree 5 7 6
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 8 1 1 9 2 2 2 4 4 4 6 6 6
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 23 23 23 30 30 30 33 33 33 37 37 37
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 7 1 15 3 3 3 25 25 98 25 25 25 22 22 134 24 24 24
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 10 10 10 26 26 26
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 7 7 7 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 22 22 22 28 28 28 36 36 36 43 43 43
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 25 25 25 29 29 29 27 27 30 26 26 26
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub 5 5
Robinia locust 1
Salix nigra black willow Tree 13
Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 4
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 3
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1 20 20 20
Stem count 9 9 17 10 10 26 12 12 14 10 10 10 12 12 26 8 8 9 11 11 77 14 14 14 189 189 371 221 221 228 260 260 412 324 324 324
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 20 20 20
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49
Species
5 6 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 9
5 6
3 5 5 5 5 16 16 23 13 13 13 13 13 19 11 11 11
Stems per ACRE 364.2 688 404.7 404.7 1052 485.6 485.6 566.6 404.7 404.7 404.7 485.6 485.6 1052� 323.7 364.2�445.2 3116 566.6 566.6 566.6 382.4 382.4 750.7 447.2 447.2 461.3 526.1 526.1 833.7 655.6 655.6 656
Color for Density PnoLs=Planted excluded livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planted included live stakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruites
Fails to meet requirements by more thah 10%

Table 7A. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data-February 2020 Data
Benton Branch Restoration Site
S ecies Common Name T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 T-8 T-9 T-10 T-11
p (221°) (182°) (251°) (295°) (44°) (145°) (343°) (160°) (131°) (282°) (205°)
Betula nigra River Birch 4 1 2 2 4 1 7 5 6 1 1
Cercis Canadensis Eastern Redbud 1 1 1
Cornus ammomum Silky Dogwood 1 1
Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon 1 3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 1 2 3 7 1 6
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 1 3 7 4 4 7
Nyssa spp. Swamp Tupelo/Black Gum 1 1
Quercus spp. Oak 1 3
Ulmus spp. Elm 1
Stem Count 8 9 6 16 15 7 23 6 6 1 1
Size(Ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Size(Acres) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 4 5 4 7 3 4 4 2 1 1 1
Stems per acre 324 364 243 647 607 283 931 243 243 40 40
Table 7B. Temporary Vegetation Plot Data- September 2020 Data
Benton Branch Restoration Site
Species Common Name T-1 T-2 T-3 T-4 T-5 T-6 T-7 T-8 T-9 T-10 T-11
(221°) (182°) (251°) (295°) (44°) (145°) (343°) (160°) (131°) (282°) (205°)
Betula nigra River Birch 3 1 4 1 2 2 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 1
Cornus ammomum Silky Dogwood 1 1
Diospyros virgininana Common Persimmon 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2 4 5 9 12 7 19 10 9 1
Liridendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 1 2
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 5 4 4 1 3 6 7 2 1 1
Prunus serotina Black Cherry 1 1
Nyssa spp. Swamp Tupelo/Black Gum 1 1
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 2 1
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak 2 1
Ulmus spp. Elm 1 1
Stem Count 10 11 9 16 20 11 31 23 18 2 3
Size(Ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Size(Acres) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 3 5 4 5 6 3 5 6 8 2 3
Stems per acre 405 445 364 647 809 445 1255 931 728 81 121
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

.,- '!�` r s .7'"�• 1 ''a`i it ti f i `-- .�}' .-- #i �r •,mot i
EF
._i , .,._
401*:
Z gyp + V r y y Jk
ANIL
-
•
T 2 f i i� +Y 5
- , ...., , ' _ . - t ' A ,
_ .., 6
r
8 Y ;z 7 a � � :
„ti ,slk . x� • = p / JusamEnwranmenlai Inc.
4�1 " ... t 4;' • p • • • L
*' __ _
r , k <. L a , s�e1LfP+t�+a µ
! ®IIR-� ., ,`• -' I .r'F a �..�r'"[.,, - .'�=+.�' p'` —..: '` r•d '�tS'. 4 :. �i.f�.3F •y,,. ",~ - �'� ,� i
/r, t tu;? ' •* ('..' -f,:> _ y ,. ' ` Prepared for:
k/ µ"h (y� f ✓'s" .CStA �, ...fir ✓ 'fir : tJ-', ` 0, v
7r...ice .ri • 1F _ .r ., - t �r►
. '7Y a
f '
}� rn' _.- �_ ASS _ /' .;� `� RESTORATION
k CO
� y,, ,"Z^e 5 � y+ � SYSTEMS I LLC
. -{ - `' :"
'
- Project:
6
4
. .
„....co
`_p` `.
," 9 '�
BENTON BRANCH
+� k�2 k� o� �i '? MITIGATION
3 +5 i\ BANK
, 7t. / I
f Xs 2 ��
• 4, i I .-� ..N" �s, ,,� ,� - h
•
JJ 9 � a �5 "irk '�/
,, ry° Is22 / ass +5� X
y 49� N +s2 Ks_-7 \� �� IT' ,�/ �I Caswell County, NC
f o a
5 N ._ kS,
X
�w 4 t.
� Title:
d XS-2 1 ,
y
` +s ..0xs2
; CURRENT
xs-4 CONDITIONS
I. 427
PLAN VIEW
.
J
- am 10 + N . -0 •r :.. W -c5 Y s :Q �• p' y ir i
•.....:... _ _-
-,. - - . _ _ � ' �,•' � x j �,� Legend
or „Iie' ,° M Benton Branch Easement=33.2 ac pa; Drawn by:
_ _ P A'. F
y ' , . F - x
- Stream Restoration=4602 ft KRJ
- Stream Enhancement(Level I)=480 ft Date:
IA Stream Enhancement(Level II @ 2.5:1)= 1084 ft 0. OCT 2019
Stream Enhancement(Level II @ 5:1)=3517 ft Scale:
11113
1:1600
Transects 200228
`r Wetland Restoration=2.7 ac r Project No.:
15-007.02
Al
r� �r R Wetland Enhancement=2.3 ac
f o - r; CVS Plots
' .'t Cross Sections FIGURE
e "' • Groundwater Gauges
3 r ream Gauges/Cameras
T 13 � ;. � 1 St
,.
{ Rain Gauge 2 B
a_
0 150 300 00
Feet

•
. • •
I' -I . ... r. j` f }� .t,:� G•w, w r.• •` 'n �-..+•!7✓ :r,• '� T ' �,`j'.- =e '7tI�'
•
�'' ! .� i ., ti 4• ,Q.• "r4�' •� ^y :it'';''- ,. '( 4, �'f •s;. �:l"` ..-r- ,p,.�,� s .,cr_. .
•
-, • r i''�� ( Ate !'•• • :5= ' wu
' s k} l..•i•tt �. - - i .• >' .{+'/i 9 w• ,`+ `X .. r t..+3y r"�' e�-v. A ; •
�..
• J0l .1_./. - { i,.,r aft:•
'''\ —- - •'-'•--..!--!" —.,t..,-•zs•4 .. .A, :..
v. _ , . 1 1 + N �s .H + y T.
< ' j < A icim Enw ranmenlai inc.
y
< r., } •5 .r ��, 4 ' y ��.rr r` i. . T+�„ Prepared for:
� ;'T .•c• '.. r,�U�,;.►C! _ :4iN k•r \ „tQ .4„t.." • k " 3.4 n�,.�' h• R , - t }i, n'; •'G
• t e g 1 {[ r ifs t ti�
Rs
. . . . ,
_ . .
, . .. __:.
j. a t�° i ,'-� '"CS' ♦ 4 Nj..f�^ I4
•� • ,1�, l �1. y yr.k��. .Yf • y1}-▪ `-S — 4.��`r' ,-2� • •t l r�rr�•lf, .� , t
• ,. ., ,,.. . .._
A + a• r �16 ` RESTORATION
*., tt3'r wr `, ' f — il' SYSTEMS I LLC
„ ,� • '' r f V�'S Project:
.— . v,...
.. ..,.... . . •
. .
,,,..- ., - ,..„
. .� 17 �--- I �� fi :y BENTON BRANCH
dir ;i s :: �Y' r �5r{� 15 , , •
MITIGATION
a:,» • +s> �-� ,". �* f �`•, - ,. BANK
fit; %. '' •' r ', _; t y • -,-• 1 •~� '�' r._.k.•- � ,wf R. .-. Al 4F, - ,� j OW.
'y* ►
•
; 1 r • "" � F r4 - J / -.-11,: - .'`
•
44t. J� � _ �c�► �F.� � _�. �.�,` d;• � Caswell County, NC
--, . •: " ' '.;� ' "? s ; y, =.� : "3F'r_ Title:
_ _ �:• _:/ ' ,.:+fir :jam. .h •,k , v , J3
n f�.•
�,' - ,. •• 6y �. •N: . t �• ate- _ �.• ._}. ;•.� , ♦ - - ., y .rii.rT
time. �w r, := -' , . "' � ! '��. f `� CURRENT
' . .;- • • ,t• --.- - , • ° ."�. • ~` '- ��` ~�`,F�. � 1 � -• =` =y' CONDITIONS
.. 'R•• l' Y .* ._4r- :. • .-`�^ - - , -, - - -'` . �_- ,,,.oi-i • .� ,.. -• -�' ,r PLAN VIEW
« s'E .silk 14 , ' 3v� � '=s t_
{, ..,.11(4. a te, . ^. t' -.44i10004 _e;.J 'w Vi ?#
.
1 D T " ''
•
.• , •A - . r , r . �Z.; •, t, r - _ _ :4,x .. ./ `.;' �i �-' *" Drawn by.
KRJ
- ,_M c' -,. v • - • z � _'�`• r -;� - - Legend Date:
1 +� , : ',"�p•,.�:,_ . - ' ' + ..,.f .-,� 1,ft` .� a' �". '. '4 p� - OCT 2019
x. �* ;3. •I:r �1 ` -;, ;� .z• _ Benton Branch Easement=33.2 ac
•ar ,.;,:� ,:``;�'j # _1, t�t ' y��_// y �,. J + a��!�- _ _ «,�� t y Scale:
.iw;F,-' -- .. ',Ilk-.t••.^••b ,•`-f- '1, ; '�G-, - ".J r - Transects 200228
z " tt. '. G 'c .t� ._— --,� �` +l T _ �'- " • .r di, " Stream Restoration=4602 ft
• - - d Project No.:
` f .� '`` _ -' -' Stream Enhancement(Level I)=480 ft
t .- . r .- )... -:� - ►. K -- c tr 15-007.02
• i - ` -r.-. �- yusi yf t �r —. .x.+„ Stream Enhancement(Level II @ 2.5:1)= 1084 ft
► < • , "`r ' • �„t<. IL..., . - `` `� ,� Stream Enhancement(Level ll @ 5:1)=3517 ft
i lam. �,T] ��--T • _ Wetland Restoration=2.7 ac FIGURE
�1 , •_ t i•• -�..,•",.- +i ce. ,. ` '. ,.... : . _ . r 1 4.' --F Wetland Enhancement=2.3 ac
•
r.
.„7,
�. . ,
.- Al c ti � �{�b .. • .,r a t •`«ii....:.„ i 7 aft _t " t , �- r- :::tions
2C
{ti4. y-..• . , -"_ ram ? ., :r
Sier: .t t o ,:V• t .. p� { 1 ,.r J "Q"":r�r , %` -'-.+w`- i .a. i - •.-wb� -
-,, 0 100 200 400
. .�; _ _ r Jam.:, �►._ �__ �= . ,4y' Feet

Benton Branch
MY-03 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken August/September 2020
Plot 1 t. ? ! Plot 2 ',,
'`,
,
i , ,-
Plot 3 Plot 6 ,
- 4.
v
.. , i r, , -;.':'II---Y 1, ----/'i _
C- 2020/08/24
. Plot 10 , ,, s Plot 11 ,,,-,,,ila
,
E
y4
1111
`,,. / y, ..
tiff"-/
4,
„. ,� .
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Benton Branch
MY-03 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (continued)
Taken August/September 2020
Plot 12 N� PIo 3 `' ,
0. �am.
tom` s "
lie; ' -• ,,
v 1 •'' .' � yi ,-{`"mil r
•
f,
Plot 14 Y 1 4.Y y• Plot 15'e
l' VfN ''••4; ".', r �'
Y.S Ms'�`' '4 v ' ?
�F +
z s w
' wS •� Z e • M Y, � r t -e
r -roll
,� �.. S �b:Ar �, � � -. ,� e • sr ,��Pks Sin � fir.:
it
�r� r •1 ~���� �:, v + � 1t ., .°'.' ^_ 1 1 -,�- t +�.�'�r' ,,•� s� y ,X'.�b.'���f + ryS WV' ''1' '' & • i a i JV 'T q'z r' - ° 'Y F` ,q2*. , z"
'44
a4k � ? ➢ e1 " " `
i
t E) f w y_: -,-,F � 4s.i Y + � ; Ex -. . ,,,' ;,4 om t N { ' , a 4. _ v � ,4 3
'ar. ,P,F , ; X � ‘ .� r `� li 1 a �� H. i �\4 4 \. : ° �:; -si-R .. '�.u��I',lit!, . • 47W\ I' /iL 1 i •,4._. R\
Plot 16 Plot 17
ie
,
Q-1 ' -,_ "t,,'' titiO;`, ',.7.gt,s,,1:2_;;;,,,R,,,..y, .
p � ,
s � r 464 F , f - ��.,, -i-5 i,� 0 �' .,�- ,4-‘ Y � .yy fd\ � � t ,4 C i �
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Benton Branch
MY-03 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (continued)
Taken August/September 2020
Plot 18 '.. 1,: Plot19 •.,2
,4
1 F "V �. t 1.fie
: % .
Plot 20 Plot 21
:M';t.• '
A�
2020/09/30 _ -- , - 2020/09/30 ',
Plot 22 , k.... �, ,' Lt Plot 23
i .spr �, , c ' � '=+ y'_.t t 'd am "�
t '
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Benton Branch
MY-03 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs (continued)
Taken August/September 2020
f6Z-maw v.: S .
. z '+ r•..," `
A Plot 24 ,ac.< -'0'
Plot 25 •
411*
,,
`#,._„ ``hs
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix D.
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Attachment B
Delivered credit yields for buffer acres in Jordan small watersheds.
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (lbs/30yrs) (lbs/30yrs)
03030002010010 Haw 25% 10% 562.34 14.38
03030002010020 Haw 37% 36% 832.26 51.77
03030002010030 Haw 44% 40% 989.72 57.52
03030002010040 Haw 49% 44% 1102.19 63.27
03030002010050 Haw 55% 48% 1237.15 69.03
03030002020010 Haw 15% 4% 337.40 5.75
03030002020020 Haw 22% 12% 494.86 17.26
03030002020030 Haw 48% 43% 1079.69 61.84
03030002020040 Haw 32% 33% 719.80 47.46
03030002020050 Haw 32% 32% 719.80 46.02
03030002020060 Haw 47% 42% 1057.20 60.40
03030002020070 Haw 54% 47% 1214.66 67.59
03030002030010 Haw 60% 56% 1349.62 80.53
03030002030020 Haw 44% 31% 989.72 44.58
03030002030030 Haw 25% 8% 562.34 11.50
03030002030040 Haw 42% 30% 944.73 43.14
03030002030050 Haw 64% 62% 1439.59 89.16
03030002030060 Haw 39% 19% 877.25 27.32
03030002030070 Haw 36% 18% 809.77 25.88
03030002030080 Haw 73% 64% 1642.04 92.04
03030002040010 Haw 30% 14% 674.81 20.13
03030002040020 Haw 28% 14% 629.82 20.13
03030002040030 Haw 71% 63% 1597.05 90.60
03030002040040 Haw 32% 15% 719.80 21.57
03030002040050 Haw 52% 50% 1169.67 71.90
03030002040060 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040070 Haw 67% 60% 1507.07 86.28
03030002040080 Haw 53% 51% 1192.16 73.34
03030002040090 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040100 Haw 75% 65% 1687.02 93.47
03030002040110 Haw 66% 60% 1484.58 86.28
03030002050010 Haw 74% 68% 1664.53 97.79
03030002050020 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002050030 Haw 42% 17% 944.73 24.45
03030002050040 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
Page 1 of 2

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (lbs/30yrs) (lbs/30yrs)
03030002050050 Haw 71% 67% 1597.05 96.35
03030002050060 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050070 Haw 78% 72% 1754.50 103.54
03030002050080 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
03030002050090 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050100 Haw 81% 75% 1821.98 107.85
03030002060010 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002060020 Haw 95% 97% 2136.90 139.49
03030002060030 Haw 88% 91% 1979.44 130.86
03030002060040 Haw 97% 98% 2181.88 140.93
03030002060050 Haw 92% 95% 2069.41 136.61
03030002060062 Haw 98% 99% 2204.38 142.37
03030002060070 UNH 40% 19% 867.70 27.32
03030002060080 UNH 59% 45% 1279.86 64.71
03030002060100 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060110 UNH 61% 58% 1323.25 83.41
03030002060120 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060140 UNH 85% 89% 1843.87 127.99
03030002060130 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060160 LNH 85% 90% 1932.07 131.76
03030002060090* UNH 92% 94% 1995.71 135.18
03030002060090* LNH 92% 94% 2091.18 137.62
03030002060060* UNH 94% 96% 2039.10 138.05
03030002060060* LNH 94% 96% 2136.64 140.54
03030002060150* UNH 88% 91% 1908.94 130.86
03030002060150* 1 LNH 1 88% 91% 1 2000.26 1 133.22
*Watershed is located in both the Upper New Hope(UNH)and Lower New Hope (LNH)Subwatersheds.
Page 2 of 2

Appendix E.
Vegetation Monitoring Datasheets
Benton Branch Bank Parcel Year 3(2020)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0001 Oct 2019 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
, Plot 1500702-01-0001 Parts: Role: Date last planted:
� P.P. ew planting date m/yy?,-
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: `S / \- / � / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: A.1t d IV' I� Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: --D jf
Latitude or UTM-N: '36.275203 Datum: INAD83/W .
(dec.deg.or m) -cisn
Longitude or UTM-E: 79.424005 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 157
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ,' Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15801 Betula nigra () R 1.5 1.8 85.0 ❑ L1 ICJ r 1
15802 Betula nigra ® R 1.6 3.6 :S2.0 ❑ ❑
15803 Betula nigra ® R 2.0 . 5.6 Missing ❑ f r . -
15804 Betula nigra ( R 1.9 6.9 90.0 ❑ III
15805 Betula nigra 0 R 2.9 8.0 72.0 ❑ ❑ a W
15806 Betula nigra ® R 4.3 6.3 120.0 DBH?❑ ❑ 0
15807 Betula nigra 0 R 4.2 4.8 Missing ❑
15808 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 3.3 1.0 135.0 DBH?❑ Lir'
15809 Betula nigra ® R 3.6 2.1 Missing ❑ ❑ 'a-,
15810 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.6 3.8 150.0 0.5❑
15811 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.5 0.4 180.0 0.9❑ a 1 V I ❑
15812 Betula nigra (- R 5.0 2.2 87.0 ❑
15813 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.3 3.7 160.0 0.9❑ 1,1 n 1
15814 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 5.6 5.2 160.0 `0.6❑ -7a ❑
15815 Betula nigra ® R 5.6 6.7 80.0 ❑ 7
C4
' 15816 BetnIa.nigra. Joi f l 'L (� R 5.8 8.2 98.0 El.,15817 Platanus-occidentalis hp "r (' R 6.0 9.6 190.0 1.0 El
15819 Betula nigra 0 R 8.7 5.5 96.0 ❑ 30
15820 Betula nigra O R 8.2 3.3 94.0 ❑ ❑ "'
15822 Betula nigra Q R 9.3 0.2 12.0 ❑ ❑
16462 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.8 8.0 130.0 0.5❑ l 1 Li
J
#stems: 21 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin_g,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p: I
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0001 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DA I A
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
•
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems — tallied by species &5ubsampline**:
}Iei;;ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm 0 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Er Sub 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 I•2 i#•3 IS:4 M5 I�6 1=7 1=8 1�7�'l 10 Fonts W S2,ver 9.1
•*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown Q 2
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0001 X-axis: 157° #stems: 21
N LARGEe.
LARGE
•
Lc.)
O
7 A5
1':5n. —
1 �t
0
4 o
tom N:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.3
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnt,y Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0002 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: /-36 / / / New...planting date m/yy? l
VI r i Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 4-- T I 1 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: �d d
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.275860 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ^79 423365 1 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 4
Plot Dimensions:X: ' 10i Y: 1 10 1
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH In Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15824 Betula nigra ® R 3.9 2.3 Missing III1- 1
15825 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 0.6 4.1 180.0 1.2
15826 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.7 7.2 175.0 1.0❑ ❑
15827 Platanus occidentalis O R 4.6 9.7 180.0 1.2❑ ass ' ,_ ❑
15828 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 4.7 7.4 31.0 ❑ ❑ v'-
15829 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 6.0 1.7 85.0 ❑ "4.O, , 7 ,
15831 Platanus occidentalis ® R 6.7 5.5 175.0 1.0 El --) S ' ,1 W
15832 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.0 7.4 93.0 ❑ 19` . y
15833 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 7.7 5.7 75.0 ❑ 1 15 ❑
15834 Platanus occidentalis Q R 8.9 5.6 59.0 ❑ hf r(P
, ic et. _.
15835 Betula nigra O R 9r9-,-'6-3 .)A a_ 82.0 El ,
16463 Platanus occidentalis () 12.4 4.4 135.0 DBH?❑ 1.1,D i i ❑ L/ -
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p:4
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

•
Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0002 Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S I)A I A
map source X Y ddh Height DBH N ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Notes
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species �&Explanation of cut-off
snbsampling**:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
ll-1
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p sub_ 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sib- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
}
As01'I Iirt!n —
ip 0 -
**Requiredifctt.off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 I•2 • 3 1••4 "5 1 [' 1n7 Ins 'a 10 FomiWS2,ver9.1
I. •• •• •• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Tran plat L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=TublinE..R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.5
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

•
Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0002 X-axis: 4° #stems: 12
E -N Re.
LA
LARGE
10
1•:5n
c
• •
(Om a:5iu
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _p_6
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0003 Party: Role: Date last planted:
I
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: i' / -3 0 / - / / � Newplanting date m/yy? f
WL l-f Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Ly fw(-tp I 1 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 'lord i
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.276271 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) „--cin
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.423282 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 38
I
'
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15837 Quercus nigra ® R 1.2 1.1 50.0 ❑ `j r- -0 J
15838 Quercus sp. Q R 1.2 3.4 Missing ❑ w
15839 Quercus sp. 0 K. 0.9 6.0 Missing ❑ El
15841 Fraxinus pennsylvanica () R 3.7 7.3 97.0 ❑ /e/$ t 7 ® .,
15842 Quercus phellos O R 4.0 2.2 25.0 Ell
15845 Betula nigra Q R 6.5 1.6 78.0 El C 7 de(
15848 Betula nigra O R 9.7 9.1 84.0 ❑
15849 Platanus occidentalis O R 9.7 6.6 93.0 ❑ !-�f r
15851 Platanus occidentalis ® R 9.7 1.7 160.0 0.8❑ -3 ❑ 4
#stems: 9 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A&subsampling *:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 13 7cm
T SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
o Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
Pre
P -
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •1 I. r 3 t Si 14-i5 Is116 I in, n] 1310 FonnWS2,ver 9.1
I. •
•• • •• • f {{ ,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplan,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ P.7
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0003 x-axis: 38° N map ize
G LARGE
®;
0
1:5n
yes
i !
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant-L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling-R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ 8
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0006 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / / / New lanting date m/yy?
1' r(• Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: . ,.p f) • Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.276455 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) • r'..'
Longitude or UTM-E: 79.423750 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): r 50
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15882 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.3 2.1 145.0 0.5❑ (} _) ) LI
15883 Betula nigra ® R 3.9 2.3 52.0 ❑ 5",,} El ! `El _ ] Ql
15884 Cephalanthus occidentalis () R 1.7 6.4 70.0 ❑ n 7,
15885 Quercus phellos ® R 0.0 8.0 35.0 ❑ 6 .-+
15886 Quercus phellos ® R 1.5 7.8 80.0 ❑ 1
15887 Quercus phellos ® R 0.4 9.8 25.0 ❑ •
7'
15888 Betula nigra O R 2.7 7.5 Missing ❑ • •1 T
15889 Betula nigra ® R 3.3 6.4 91.0 ❑ 1.0 ❑ G
15890 Platanus occidentalis Q R 4.6 0.0 118.0 DBH?❑ / t� n 't
15891 Betula nigra ® R 5.8 7.9 103.0 DBH?❑ 1 03 L❑J
15892 Betula nigra QI R 5.0 5.9 41.0 ❑ -� .. ❑
15893 Quercus phellos Q R 4.9 8.9 45.0 ❑ 79 . El
15894 Betula nigra O R 4.4 7.5 58.0 ❑ ❑ Cs?
15896 Betula nigra 0 R 6.2 3.2 75.0 ❑
15897 Platanus occidentalis ( R 8.2 2.3 111.0 DBH?❑ i�r- -- + ; ❑ Z
15899 Quercus phellos Q R 9.8 8.5 Missing El �p j W❑
15900 Betula nigra O k 8.4 8.5 60.0 ❑ 41_ W+
E _
15901 Betula nigra ® R 7.1 8.2 70.0 ❑
15902 Quercus phellos O R 6.4 9.3 +,i.0 ❑ ❑
#stems: 19 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name SOurCe* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
. C I Cfl ' 2 G,3 °m c{ut_ , h
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stak,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.14
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0006 Oct 2019 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &planation cut-off:
Oleillht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap' 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I r -
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 E•2 • 3 I••4 "5 6 I : Ins`•�1 �10 FomiWS2,ver9.1
• •• •• •• ■ i
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlpp,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p, 15
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0006 X-axis: 50° N #stems: 19
map size:
LARGE
r 1
I h
1
0
Y:5m
4 o
(0.0 X:5 n1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ba11 and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tub1i R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p. 16
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0010 Part : Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): ' 3 Date: /Wb / - /5 0 / _ New...planting date m/yy? /
I Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: } I_ -elk `-c a -- Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: • 0 _ _
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.275605 Datum: NAD83/W _
(dec.deg.or m) f'1'0
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.424279 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 26
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
s
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15936 Betula nigra ® R 2.0 2.9 Missing ❑ ❑ LL
15938 Betula nigra Q R 1.2 6.8 65.0 ❑ 90
15940 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 1.3 8.2 42.0 ❑ 66
15941 Betula nigra ® R 1.2 9.7 28.0 ❑ -
15942 Betula nigra ® R 2.9 8.7 70.0 ❑ 'fa ❑ `�
3 j ,
15944 Betula nigra 0 R 5.3 6.0 110.0 DBH?❑ '- �"
15945 Betula nigra () R 6.4 3.7 110.0 DBH?❑ ( tt
15946 Betula nigra Q R 7.9 1.8 55.0 ❑ j 1 0
15947 Betula nigra O R 8.6 4.6 90.0 ❑ ❑
15948 Betula nigra ® R 5.8 9.9 80.0 ❑ NO O -` El 4-I
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
(Lk v&, nr 13 Li 7? `I
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation of cutoff
/&subsamMine**:
eightCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ l00cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name a sub_ 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- � =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
•
P( d c 0
1 **Re qui red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 1.2 S 3 I i4 N5 I -il6 7 118 I 4 a0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
I� rf i
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.25
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0010 X-axis: 26° #stems: 10
N map size:
1 �) LARGE
}
Y:5n
w
• •
(0.0) X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.26
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CIS-EEPEnt,y Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
'Plot 1500702-01-0011 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: ' /a.0 / - \ /17 h / fi //f1 LI New lanting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 14414 k f..d`l Notes: sampled,specify reason below
W Taxonomic Standard DATE: (
W () .
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.276309 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) r'0'ym
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.424594 UTM Zone: ' I .
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 358
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* I cm sprout g g
15951 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.0 1.5 54.0 ❑ 6 '
15952 Ce is canadensis @ R 1.2 4.1 50.0 ❑ f' i n
i,
15953 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 0.6 6.0 61.0 ❑ �� -- 3
15954 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.4 9.3 80.0 ❑ _ W�
15955 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.9 9.5 70.0 El fr, ❑ 3
15956 Nyssa sylvatica 0 R 4.7 8.3 52.0 ❑ ❑
15957 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.6 7.1 60.0 ❑ El C
15959 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 4.0 2.5 68.0 ❑ v C
15960 Nyssa sylvatica O R 6.3 0.8 58.0 ❑ 5 3 0 3 ,
15962 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 6.4 6.8 55.0 ❑ n
15963 Nyssa sylvatica 0 R 6.9 9.1 52.0 ❑ P Q7 ._r n
15964 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.2 10.0 40.0 ❑ q;� 3 le-4
15965 Nyssa sylvatica R 9.9 7.9 49.0 t .Z
15966 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 7.6 4.6 59.0 ❑ h c ---
15967 Nyssa sylvatica @ R 8.5 1.9 51.0 ❑
15968 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 8.0 6.8 51.0 ❑ 5-3 r
16467 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 0.8 0.1 56.0 ❑ (p a CI C eK
#stems: 17 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.27
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Too!ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0011 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DMA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH I* ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
AExplanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam dine**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm L 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSFS SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name CJ1 sub 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm- sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
7ef
**Requi red ifcitoff>l0cmorsubsample?100%. St •2 •M A*4 H5 !}i[ 1:18r 10 FoimWS2,ver 9.1
• `+•
y1t
*SOURCE_Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically U=Unknown p.28
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Ent y Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0011 X-axis: 358° #stems: 17
A size:
G LARGE
LARR GE
1'))
0
1:Sn
ft
qI
I
(0.11) X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p,29
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0012 Par.).: Role: Date last planted:
New_planting date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: . /as_1 1 �G� / �j�l -( I Check box if plot was not
W
Taxonomic Standard: ebt ." Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ";L. 6l .
Latitude or UTM-N: '36.276457 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg,or m) •4 v
Longitude or UTM-E: 79.425015 UTM Zone: ' I _
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 26 -
L Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 [I]Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH m Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout g g
15972 Cercis canadensis ® K 1.5 9.0 55.0 ❑ / ) El
15973 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 3.3 8.1 55.0 0 6 e{
15974 Nyssa sylvatica O R 3.4 3.7 40.0 ❑ 1 7 E❑ "5
•
15975 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 4.0 1.2 55.0 ❑ S "
15976 Cercis canadensis Q R 5.7 2.5 41.0 ❑ y ( ❑ 3
15977 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 8.0 4.2 30.0 ❑ L. „
15978 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 5.4 6.7 34.0 LIL! C n —3
#stems: 7 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Source*
X Y Height DBH
Species Name (m) (m) 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes 1 cm g
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /&subsampling**:
• Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH ~
Species Name r sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH) t
1:7 el
C4 ( Ak,
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 102 • 3 • !a 1145 1 6 %k7 �8 :19 10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
• •• ■ • .•• • ��#• l�1ii i
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake_,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin.,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.30
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0012 X-axis: 26° #stems: 7
N map size:
G LARGE
•
,.:5n — —
111.01 X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burl.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p,31
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. - Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0014 P. . Role: Date last planted:
MirVMD Year.(1-5): 3 Date: ti 1` 1.1 / - I Cf /' ( / New lanting date m/yy?
` Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: \1 Uv Y"k{i Ell
sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: "—le to
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.271527 Datum: NAD$3/W4(dec.deg.or m) °
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.429882 UTM Zone: MI
Accuracy(m): I X-Axis bearing(deg): 76
I
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
.
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm , * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15992 Quercus nigra O R 1.5 2.5 70.0 ❑ 9 c—
El 15993 Betula nigra ® R 3.8 1.4 Missing ❑ III
-
15995 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 3.2 6.2 Missing ❑
15997 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 6.6 7.4 45.0 ❑ _ ❑
16000 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 8.8 7.0 50.0 ❑ 6 ! 0
16001 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 8.2 4.1 115.0 DBH?❑ III
16002 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 6.8 4.1 60.0 ❑ r ❑
#stems: 7 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
. I i
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su team piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑T 7cm
TSEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 I Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm-
Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH) '
( /
YIP — —
_ — I
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. •I `2 0•
•*4 G S t I 7 `:8 I ) ��10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.32
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0014 x-axis: 76° N #stems: 7
rl` map size:
U LARGE
Y:5n
•
• T •
(0,0) X:5iii
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.33
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0015 P, 1\: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: CO/a I / / I' New lanting date'm/yy?
IA. ty Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: I r e: 11/4Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 136.271883 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) I .-'co.
Longitude or UTM-E: 179.429571 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 16 W
Plot Dimensions:X: I 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes 1
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout g g
16004 Betula nigra Q R 3.6 5.9 110.0 DBH?[] 1t& .. .. ❑ f
16005 Betula nigra 0 R 2.2 8.3 105.0 DBH?[] /II, /3
16006 Betula nigra () R 4.3 8.7 r,0.0 El _l L V ,. 0 J
16009 Betula nigra ® R 6.8 9.4 Missing ❑ l6S-- 1 ❑
16011 .Br u4s-s a• Cc a( O R 8.0 7.1 Missing ❑ l o�-r? z-.
16012 Fraxti ns-penmsylv`C ica ® R 3.1 0.6 100.0 ❑ /4 El ,'
#stems: 6 -New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(P1'anted Woody Stems)Form:
Source*
X Y Height DBH
Species Name (m) (m) 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes 1 cm g g
k- .
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampline**:
I Ieiiht Cut-Off(All stems shorterthan this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10..cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
( — 4
—
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. 01 IO2 • 3 1004 �5 + r+ I=7 138 13i 1N10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake�B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p_34
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0015 X-axis: 16° #stems: 6
map size:
N LARGE
•
k
Y:Sn
(0,0) S:5nm
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.35
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
'Plot 1500702-01-0016 Party: /� Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: �/� / / 0 / I' p New lanting date m/yy? j
[
r Check box if plot was not
y
Taxonomic Standard: ev'Nl -I Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: - d 1()
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.272880 Datum: NAD83/W _
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.429170 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 346 i
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
16014 Betula nigra ® R 0.9 1.2 95.0 ❑ l({ ❑
16016 Quercus nigra ® R 0.8 3.4 Missing ❑ -❑
16017 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 2.8 6.5 95.0 ❑ i L{ •-1 ❑ 4
16018 Quercus phellos O R 0.5 6.7 Missing ❑ ❑
16019 Betula nigra ® R 1.4 9.6 70.0 ❑ '7, El
16021 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 3.1 3.5 93.0 ❑ /,G ! l Li
16022 Betula nigra ® d: 4.9 0.7 Missing ❑ ❑
16023 Betula nigra Q R 6.9 1.0 85.0 ❑ ($S- ,L ❑
16025 Betula nigra Ql R 9.1 2.0 68.0 ❑ ' I 1 ❑
16026 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 7.1 4.5 60.0 ❑ /y ❑
16028 Betula nigra ® R 4.6 9.3 -5.0 ❑ f0 El ?
16474 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.2 6.8 70.0 ❑ i a C- ❑
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE_Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,_P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.36
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0016 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S i)A-1 A
map source X Y ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) 1(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
l cplanaIion of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamjAing**:
.1 lei ght Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
•
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
+ )L r — -
- .j-
`
**Required if cutoff>10cmor subsample?100%. .1 I*2 • 3 �64 N5 I0 Ile r6 1n7
I118a r 10 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.37.
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0016 X-axis: 346° #stems: 12
map size:
GN LARGE
r ----,
®
((' 0
1:5n
Tr-
()()
• •
(0,0) x:5m„ +
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.38
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0017 Party: rr Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: `6/a ti'1 / - c /3 0 / _ IJ �� New lanting date m/yy?
�� Check box if plot was not 1
Taxonomic Standard: V0I V Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.273295 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) f LC.12
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.429498 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 308
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
r
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
16030 Betula nigra ® R 1.2 4.2 92.0 ❑ /c.i 0 Li 3
16031 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 0.7 8.0 80.0 ❑ 13 0 r El
16032 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 2.9 7.3 -2.0 ❑ /10 •:i
16033 Betula nigra ® R 3.5 3.7 85.0 ❑
16034 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.8 2.7 Missing ❑ 0 Ail16035 Quercus lyrata O R 6.2 2.3 Missing ❑ ❑
r
16036 Betula nigra O R l "89 105.0 DBH?❑ /I0
16037 Quercus nigra ® R 5.7 7.0 70.0 ❑ 1 S ❑
16038 Nyssa sylvatica O R 5.8 9.1 5.0 ❑ '4 ❑ 3
16041 Betula nigra O R 7.2 9.6 95.0 ❑ or El
•16042 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 7.7 8.3 -.0.0 III (i� ❑
16043 Betula nigra ® R 8.8 9.8 70.0 ❑ El�) -
16044 Betula nigra ® R 10.0 8.2 •0.0 ❑ d1.
16045 Quercus sp. ® R 10.0 9.6 Missing ❑ ❑ 3
16047 Quercus sp. () ti 8.0 4.3 50.0 ❑ 0
16049 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 8.5 0.2 150.0 0.5❑ (0�_ ❑ 3 •
16050 Quercus phellos ® R 9.9 0.4 120.0 DBH?❑ i6o , ❑ /
#stems: 17 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
r . ,1,k Svc[
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burl,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,_M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p,39
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0017 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) I (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout 1
(
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species �&,ubsamolina**:
l lei ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10an,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
•
Species Name 0 Sub 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
i s /
P�1 1 o 1
+J !V f I /
I
1,- P t
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■l 1•2 ■ 3 10 Om N5 ip-![} I= 1=8 13+ 10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
I. ■• •• •• 0•
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicall}.U=Unknown_ p.40
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
' M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnt,y Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0017 x-axis: 308° #stems: I7
map size.
LARGE
_ _ _ _ _ _
.
11111
(0.0) x:s,»
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.41
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, , ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Yt7 Qt., t1
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0018 Party: Role: Date last planted:
Wi : + New...planting date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: q/3 U /)-0)p - / / - Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 0 P-I P. Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.278533 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ...
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.417650 UTM Zone: ,
Coordinate Accuracy(m): =I X-Axis bearing(deg): r 124
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEARS DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15648 Cercis canadensis Q R 0.0 0.6 28.0 ❑ 6- ❑ ,i
15649 Cercis canadensis ® R 2.8 41:7.. I G 35.0 ❑ ❑
15651 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.7 2.6 36.0 ❑ ❑ j
15652 Quercus rubra ® R 0.5 2.6 25.0 ❑ ❑
15653 Quercus phellos ® R 0.6 4.6 50.0 ❑ 5 ❑ 'c(
15654 Quercus phellos O R 2.7 4.6 55.0 ❑ 7 ? ❑ I
15655 Cercis canadensis 0 R 5.7 0.9 30.0 ❑ � ❑ (r
15656 Cercis canadensis 0 R 8.2 1.3 Missing ❑ ❑ , f'!
15659 Quercus phellos ® R 6.9 4.8 61.0 ❑ (o,/ ❑
15661 Quercus nigra Q R 5.9 7.7 15.0 ❑ 111 ,.-'
15663 Quercus nigra ® R t(.416• !' ,© 78.0 ❑ 1�` r -) +�Q
15664 Quercus phellos O R 1 5.1 4.5 3 45.0 ❑ - `'3'
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) I1 cm*t 1 DBcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap;P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.42
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0
1

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0018 Uct 2019 Data z 0 THIS YEAR'S f]A'IA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Exntanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sukampline**:
I-
IeightCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name El Sub 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
CG1c1 21
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. .1 1.2 • 3 1!`4 �5 1:46 1:7 1138
0 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B_Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 43
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0018 x-axis: _124° N #stems: 12
\^ map size:
U LARGE
411
•
1:5n
o
• i
0.0) - X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin ,_R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.44
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0019 Party: Role: Date last planted:
/
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: Ci /30 / - / / New lanring date m/yy?
LICheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: t Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: r ,'
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.275203 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) •'rfl
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.418009 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 124
- -Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH fi. Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
15667 Quercus nigra O R 1.1 0.6 45.0 ❑ (o " ` 1
15668 Quercus nigra ( R 3.7 0.4 Missing ❑ 1 Ti
15669 Quercus nigra © R 2.7 3.0 75.0 ❑ g a l n
15670 Quercus nigra ® R 5.6 3.0 49.0 Illl J
15671 Quercus nigra O R 6.3 0.2 44.0 ❑
15672 Quercus nigra ® R 8.9 0.6 54.0 ❑ ❑ 3
15675 Quercus nigra ® R 5.9 5.0 30.0 ❑ -(0 El
15676 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 6.6 8.0 45.0 ❑ Li
15677 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 8.8 8.1 38.0 ❑ t.j ❑ Lf
15678 Quercus alba= ® R 1.1 J.2- 25.0 ❑ ❑
15679 Quercus nigra ® R 3.1 5.0 35.0 ❑ n
15681 Quercus phellos O R 4.2 8.0 'l.0 ❑
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
h 7
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.45
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0019 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) I (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-offNatural Woody Stems - tallied by species &Album Nina":
1 lei l;ht Cut-Off(AB stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q Sub 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
Q .-'
l^ 4 —
• `
**Requiredifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■1 1:2 • 3 *4 =5 =6 1
=7 I=8 la) +:10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin R=bare Root,M=Mechanical U=Unknown _ _ _ p.46
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, 1 ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0019 X-axis: 124°, N #stems: 12
0 map size:
LARGE
• •
CD' �T
Y:Sn 9 V
ti) ,
t Y
i r •
(0.0) \:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,El—Ball and burl P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanicallv.U=Unknown p.47
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0020 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: ct, /a; / - t/ ry U / .. New lanting date m/yy? 1 /
V� Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: ( Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
0 F -
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.2764 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or in) '-79 4175 UTM Zone 0
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): X-Axis bearing(deg): r 141 _
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 E Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH F, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* I cm I * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
--
15683 Quercus nigra O R 0.2 0.6 52.0 ❑ -p 3 -0fy_
15684 Quercus nigra O R 2.0 1.3 49.0 ❑ ".
15685 Quercus nigra ® R 4.1 1.9 45.0 ❑ L! V
15686 Quercus nigra ® R 1.6 4.8 -0.0 ❑
15687 Quercus nigra O R 6.0 2.8 25.0 ❑ ,Z
15688 Quercus pltelles, Ai 1(6 O R 5.3 0.2 '0.0 ❑ 'd1 0
15690 Cercis canadensis 0 R 8.1 3.1 60.0 ❑ n a
15693 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 7.8 6.0 •10.0 ❑ C
15694 Quercus nigra. 09 0)u Q R 5.9 5.2 24.0 ❑ 5- ❑
15695 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 6.5 7.2 -15.0 ❑
15696 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 8.5 7.5 50.0 ❑ YJ 6
15697 Quercus nigra ® R 8.7 9.9 '.8.0 ❑ -7<- 0
15698 Quercus nigra O R 6.3 9.9 Missing El ] U
15699 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 4.3 6.3 '0.0 ❑ $0
15701 Quercus nigra O R 3.9 5.1 30.0 ❑ - 0 y
15702 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 2.2 6.3 10.0 ❑ / ❑
15703 Quercus phellos Q R 2.2 8.4 30.0 ❑ 6
f
#stems: 17 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) , 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant;L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.48
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0020 Oct 2019 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
ismc
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species subsamohne*:
11eght Cut-Off(All stems shorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Su>r =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
+ 10 f /
**Re qui red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 •2 • + 1
••4 •'•5 I:M6 I 8` 11310 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
• •■ •■ ■• I • N
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.49
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0020 X-axis: 140° #Stems: 17
N map size:
0 LARGE
O )
/
�:Sin
•
M •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.50
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

F
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0021 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: /]�1 / - f,�/ / New lanting date m/yy? /
J Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: i"(j 0 P, Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ;c)(,) 14 64 ,
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.2759 Datum: NAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) I-79.4144 UTM Zone:
I Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): n X-Axis bearing(deg): 180
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
- -s
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ', Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15704 Quereus ,w St Q R 0.1 2.6 55.0 0 fa:
15705 Cercis canadensis © R 3.4 2.5 38.0 ❑
W
15708 Nyssa sylvatica CI) R 4.2 4.6 35.0 ❑ ❑
15709 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.4 4.0 62.0 PI'L
15711 Nyssa sylvatica Ql R 5.6 7.4 32.0 ❑ . E1
15712 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 5.0 6.0 41.0 ❑ r 'l;��,. n V
15713 Cercis canadensis 0 R 8.5 8.4 35.0 E n! 3
15714 Cercis canadensis () R 7.1 9.5 65.0 ❑ 1 C7 El 2
15715 Quercus phellos ® R 2.2 10.0 t33.0 ❑ El
15716 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.6 8.4 90.0 ❑ I 0 El ]
15719 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.8 5.4 35.0 ❑ 19u 3
15720 Cornus amomum O R 3.5 7.0 25.0 E '. :I f
• 15722 Quercus phellos Q R 2.2 3.3 .'.0 3
15724 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.7 0.8 30.0
r
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(P anted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) 11 cm' 1 cm DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.51
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0021 Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species �A.subsampling**:
1Fiei;htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): "IOcm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Er Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
L'
H—
**Reqii.difcff>10cmorsubmpIe?l00% .1 I. ■ 3 1!4 •-.5 It-'6 I=' I 8`�1 1210 FormWS2,ver9.1
■ ■i ii ■i ■ ,
r
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.52
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0021 X-axis: 180° #stems: 14
0 map size:
N LARGE
r •
"(-)
Y:5nl
(1.1
• i
(0,0) X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.53
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0022 P' : Role: Date last planted: l
Q, / � / ,- / / -New planting date m/yy?
3 Date:
VMD Year(1-5): v a � cl 33 d Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: V,,C cA.AN`s l - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -)-9' -,(( Y
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.2757 Datum: 1NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) `wo -
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.4153 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): _ X-Axis bearing(deg): 88 Plot Dimensions:X: 1 10 Y: ' 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
s
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH , Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char Olin 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
15726 Cercis canadensis 0 R 1.8 2.9 36.0 ❑ 1 15727 Cercis canadensis ® R 0.5 0.0 45.0 ❑ 0
15728 Cercis canadensis ® R 2.7 0.5 Missing ❑ ❑15729 Cercis canadensis 0 R 4.5 0.6 60.0 ❑ ❑ MI
15730 Cercis canadensis 0 R 4.1 3.3 35.0 ❑ TV,- ❑ -_
15731 Quercus phellos ® R 6.5 1.2 80.0 ❑ NMI-MUM 15732 Quercus nigra () R 8.7 1.4 „s.0 ❑t. w �, ❑ L'._
15736 Conius amomum Oj R 5.4 9.6 85.0 ❑ f jlairinlii
15738 Quercus phellos 0 R 9.2 7.3 5.0 ❑ Ho - ❑ r i
15739 Quercus phellos ® R 2.6 5.3 70.0 ❑ IrTilffil ❑ Li,w
15740 Cornus amomum tt 3� 0 R 3.4 9.0 70.0 El �,-mre'
15741 �inuc a�unenun:r - CI -M
15742 Platanus occidentaalis () R 0.2 9.8 170.0 1.O❑ 1113 15, 11•1113
15743 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.5 6.5 37.0 ❑ b r i- ❑ I N
15744 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.5 5.0 120.0 DBH?❑ IS■11/F15 110,6`.•
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(P11. ted Woody Stems)Form:
Y Species Name Source* (m) (m)
1 cm* 1D cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
•
) ,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,-U=Unknown p 54
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0
l

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0022 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA I
map source X Y ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
1 •
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm D 137cm
' SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH 1
Species Name 0 Sub 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
1 c seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
p
P. i •
rl 1 irqb
- . • -
I/I 4114N _
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. •1 1•2 • 3 �•4 r-.5 1�t, 7 I:8 ai x10 Fonn WS2,ver9.1
• ■• •• •• •
, *SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.55
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool vet.2.3.0
ti

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0022 X-axis: 88° N #stems: 15
map size:
0 LARGE
•
\:5n •
I
(,)
• (4 •
41►,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.56
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.1.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0023 Pa : Role: Date last planted:
Mrar Check box if plot was not
-
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: / -i / '1/ 3 f�/ lanting date m/yy? f 1
New...planting
Taxonomic Standard: U/•� �.c�L•� _�'� Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: tjkQ f D
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.2753 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ioQ
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.4149 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): X-Axis bearing(deg): I 140
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH I* Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm ! lcm* 1 cm sprout
15747 Comus amomum Q R 0.3 1.0 52.0
0 i _,
15749 Comus amomum ® R 1.1 2.7 68.0 _`11P;r
15750 Cornus amomum Q R 3.6 3.3 52.0
riD , f
15751 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 5.7 2.9 41.0
d .if
15752 Cercis canadensis Ita Q R 5.7 2.9 61.0
15754 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.7 2.3 28.0 0 El
15756 Quercus nigra 0 R 9.8 7.4 50.0 E
15758 Cercis canadensis COR 6.0 7.6 35.0 E _
11!
15759 Cercis canadensis ® R 4.5 9.6 62.0 El Q
15760 Cornus amomum 0 R 3.1 9.0 45.0 ❑ 111
15761 Cornus amomum ® R 3.7 5.4 44.0 ❑ / 0 y
15762 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.4 6.3 40.0 ■ I
15763 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 1.0 9.4 33.0 j F,
#stems: i3 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If it c ce neede use blank" ‘ -(Planted body Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 I
'
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlapx P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ P.57
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0023 Oct 2019 Data c THIS YEAR'S DAIA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Nplanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamNine**:
(eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sorb- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
Pi�Jt — •
—
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •1 !•2 • 3 i1114 !•5 I♦-•6 I I 8`r�j 9 In10 FotmWS2,ver
9.1
■ •• •• •• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U Unknown p.58
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Mapof stems onplot 1500702-01-0023 X-axis: _ 140° #stems: 13
N 0 map size:
LARGE
There are multiple stems represented by
some letters,shown in bold on the map.
i
I
�:5„
•
(0.0,l
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.59
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, 1 ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0024 • Part..: Role: _ Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: /?.Li / - q. / �7 / New_planting date m/yy?
/V Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: I,t/ It( 'I i Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: " {) CoPi 4
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.2748 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg.or in) i,•S'Illo
Longitude or UTM-E: 79.4151 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): X-Axis bearing(deg): r 1901 -
Plot Dimensions:X: I 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15766 Quercus phellos O k 1.1 3.4 40.0 D 79 0 LI
15767 Quercus phellos 0 R 2.9 4.6 65.0 ❑ f 0 1 _ 1
15768 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 9.2 0.3 40.0 ❑ i` -n
15771 Quercus nigra () R 7.5 9.0 50.0 ❑ 71 i 1
15772 Quercus nigra Q it 6.0 8.0 •.0 ❑
15773 Quercus phellos ® R 4.9 5.4 59.0 ❑
416) 1 '
15774 Quercus phellos ® R 4.0 7.2 40.0 El ❑ 1 V
15775 Quercus phellos ® R 2.4 6.3 42.041r* El y
15776 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 3.9 9.6 42.0 0 / 0 111 I 4,
15777 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 0.7 8.0 60.0 0 10. ❑
15778 Quercus nigra ® r 0.6 5.6 47.0 0 $51)
El
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* ' (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
i
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stakes B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p,60
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Plo (continued): 1500702-01-0024 TOct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y I ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sulisampling**: .
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name Q Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cl It
Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap' 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
d� - 'ir a _ •
/ 0CIO • •
• • ~ •
-
Ce 0 t —
**Required if ell-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. *I 102 * 3 Illi•4 *-05 1z-*G V7 I1 18 i �10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
0 •• •• •• •• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin R=bare Root,M Mechanically.U=Unknown .61 '
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.0
1

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0024 X-axis: 190° #stems: 11
map size:
N LARGE
r •
f
b �
Y:5 l n
CA%
•
t \
• 4
�0.0> x:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,_L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.62
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 1500702-01-0025 Pert.: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 3 Date: /a-' / • k /`�0 / New lanting date m/yy?
V
A" ,�
Check box if plot was not
specify Taxonomic Standard: 9 • �/ pc. Notes: sampled, reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: . .
Latitude or UTM-N: 36.2743 Datum: NAD831W .
(dec.deg.or m) L°
Longitude or UTM-E: -79.4143 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): X-Axis bearing(deg): I 160
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: f 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Oct 2019 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 1 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
15781 Quercus phellos ® R 0.8 0.7 83.0 ❑ V (.1
15782 Quercus phellos ® R 2.8 0.7 60.0 0 C ❑
15783 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 1.6 2.7 35.0 E I ❑ L
15785 Quercus nigra 0 R 9.8 1.2 40.0 0 LJ
15787 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 5.2 1.5 80.0 ❑ Yv a) El i
15788 Quercus nigra © R 6.1 3.9 58.0 ❑
15789 Betula nigra () R 8.7 7.0 142.0 0.4❑
15790 Betula nigra O R 7.1 7.6 85.0 ❑ III
~
15792 Quercus phellos (aR 7.6 9.6 75.0 0
15794 Platanus occidentalis Q R 4.4 9.4 75.0 o n
15795 Fraxinus pennsylvanica O R 1.4 7.7 78.0 ❑ 'a,1i t L! E c
15796 Quercus phellos ® R 0.9 9.8 20.0 0 El '
15797 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.1 5.6 95.0 ❑ t ?1° El L '
15798 Quercus nigra 0 R 2.2 5.3 :,i I.0 ❑ •-,
15799 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.3 5.0 130.0 DBH?0 S 1 Cr
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
r
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin�,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.63
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0
i

Plot(continued): 1500702-01-0025 Oct 2019 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamplinE**:
Hei' ht Cut-O if(All stems shoiter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
s Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm-
Specie Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. 01 102 • 3 10 04 41.5 111-i6 1=7 1 t8--73, 10 Fonn WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE TrTransplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubli�R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.64
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0

Map of stems on plot 1500702-01-0025 X-axis: 160 0 #stems: 15
map size:
N_EDLARGE
CO
A
® a)
•
Y:5n
a)
p
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.65
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.0