090117_Inspection_20200306

O Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - `/7 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: /9:w Departure Time:l /.30 County: 7/aeo/ _Region:
Farm Name: 4;4ee" //i /g',k Owner Email:
Owner Name: j 7ed/i �`j'tet' Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:Facility Contact: ;j> ,% . / y i1y�LLJ Title: g(e�`JYr Phone:
Onsite Representative: , 1GGr1'— Integrator: ,✓e—11
Certified Operator: 51eoe �� Certification Number: 98W9"40
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish /a7 ? Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca aci Po . Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish 11122 -- Beef Stocker
Gilts I.Non-La ers —_ Beef Feeder _
Boars El Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other II Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? es IXO ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9' - J/7 Date of Inspection: 6— ?I
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Ells< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /9
Observed Freeboard(in): Ao --
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ,6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No D NA El NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 12Ks ❑ No 0 NA 0 NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Ym'# /Dg,�r z j
13. Soil Type(s): eG
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ales ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑//No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Er:To ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [/'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA El NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [!yo ❑ NA 0 NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: O ' - //7 Date of Inspection: 3-1, -e_ w)
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Er•rlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [�]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ErNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
GOPFC �r ! r�'� a( CArck list I Gc-J a_ iO vvg,t ✓ '"'�
gl'i-sogrAettoil;7 cr-t /...?per.-._IA/1/4_
A ,_, ,� �---.mac
, -1 '3417lei
L, fi( ACV•ee'e s.
f�2t r�rY) f t`. rak
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � Phone: 9,7/2 303-- '/c"(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,#-: 126- Date: J20, -8
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015