20201239 Ver 1_401 Application_20201117

VXR,
d bloe of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
September 1, 2020 Ver 3.2
1a. Name of project:
Pierce Landing
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?
Deborah Shirlely
1b. Primary Contact Email: 1c. Primary Contact Phone:
[e-mail] [phone]
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.604711-78.589182
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Nearest Body of Water
Is this a NCDMS Project*
o Yes r- No
Is this project a public transportation project?
o Yes o No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
P1 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified bythe Corps?
O Yes o No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
12 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
9 Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record onlyfor DWR401 Certification:
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
o Yes c No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
a Yes a No
o Yes a No

C Yes o No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes o No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
a Yes o No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
❑ Owner © Applicant (other than
owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Brack Penny Road Limited Partnership
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 01962 Page: 0881
2c. Responsible party:
Steven Carroll, Partner
2d.Address
Street Address
7036 Brack Penny Road
Address Line 2
Qty
Raleigh
Postal / Zp Code
27603-0000
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
steve.ca rro [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Cameron ,ones
3b. Business Name:
Dr. Horton-Terramor LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
7208 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 201
Address Line 2
Qty
Raleigh
Fbstal / Zp Code
27615
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:
Cameron.Jc)nes@terrarnorhon)es.com
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil R Environmental Consultants, PA
State / Aovince / P gicn
NC
Country
United States
2f. Fax Number:
State / Aovince / P gicn
NC
Country
United States
3e. Fax Number:

4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
Oty
Raleigh
Postal / Zp Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
SREC Agent authorization form Applicant executed 9-14-20.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Garner
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
162700-25-1293
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Pierce Road
Address Line 2
Oty
Garner
Fbstal / Zp Code
27529
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest bodyof water to proposed project:
Buffalo Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C;NSW
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010903
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
4. Project Description and History
State / Aovince / Regim
NC
Country
United States
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
2b. Property size:
+/- 88.38
State / Aovince / Regim
NC
Country
United States
110.44KB
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions onsite consist primarily of forested land. There are two (2) perennial stream features (SA R SB), one (1) intermittent stream feature (SB), five (5) wetland features
(W1-W5), and one (1) pond feature (Pond 1) on the property. Perennial stream'A' bounds the property on the west along with adjacent wetland "W1' and'W2'. Perennial stream'B'
runs through the southern part of the property with the stream initially starting out intermittent before becoming perennial and connecting with SA. SB also features adjacent wetlands
'W4' R'W5'. Pond 1 is located in the Northeast part of the property with adjacent wetland'W3'. The general land use in the vicinity of the project consists mainly of forested and
agricultural land with some rural development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
a Yes o No a Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS.pdf 7.01 MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
SS.pdf 1.83MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

Approximately 3.90 ac
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 3,450 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of this project is to construct a residential development and necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The overall project consists of the construction of a residential development, including but not limited to roads, stormwater devices, and residential structures. Specifically, there is one
(1) road crossing that impacts streams and riparian buffers. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will
be utilized for this project.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
IT Yes o No a Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
0 Preliminary a Approved a Not Verified a Unknown a N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-00810
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil R Environmental Consultants, PA
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made bythe Corps or DWR
USACE: Site visit and field determination made by Chris Hopper on 8/10/2020.
Johnston County Buffer Determination made by Charles Fender on 7/1/2020 (NBR# NB 20-018).
**PLEASE NOTE THAT PJD/AJD HAS NOT BEEN ISSUED TO DATE. SECTION C.5B CHECKED TO OPEN THIS DATA BOX AJD NEEDED FOR NON -JD POND ON PROPERTY.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Letter and soils map --JOCO buffer letter.pdf 2.47MB
RE_ SAW-2020-00810--Pierce Road Tract _ Garner NC _ Johnston County.pdf 100.01 KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
a Yes o No
7b. If yes, explain.
For construction purposes, the project will be broken out into 2 phases.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands © Streams -tributaries 9 Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
S1
3a. Reason for impact*(?)
Impact 1-Road Crossin
p 9
(Culvert R Headwalls)
3b.lmpact type *
Permanent
3c. Type of impact*
Culvert
3d. S. name*
Stream B
3e. Stream Type *
(?)
Perennial
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
Both
3g. S. width *
6
Average (feet)
3h. Impact
length*
129
(linear feet)
gp
Impact 1-Road Crossing
(construction
access/dewatering )
Temporary
Other
Stream B
Perennial
Both
6
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)

S3 Impact 1-RipRap Dissipator Permanent Other Stream B Perennial Both 6 68
Pad (Permanent -No Avaage (feet) (linear feet)
Permanent Loss)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
197
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
207
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
10
3j. Comments:
Total permanent loss stream = 129 LF; Total permanent -no permanent loss stream = 68 LF; Total temporary stream = 10 LF; Temporary stream
impacts will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream banks will be stabilized.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
m Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
❑ Goose Creek ❑ Jordan Lake
❑ Other
ib. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
mpact 1-Road Crossing P Stream B No 8,445 2,195
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 8,445.00
2,195.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: ;8,445.00
2,195.00
6i. Comments:
Supporting Documentation
20201111 Pierce Landing Impact Exhibits.pdf 2.36MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
SREC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify natural resources so that impacts
could be avoided R minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact 1 is a proposed road crossing requesting riparian buffer and stream impacts.
This road crossing is necessary to provide access to the property from Pierce Road. Headwalls have been utilized to minimize stream and riparian
buffer impact. A rip -rap dissipator pad has been proposed to minimize flows from the culvert outlet and to assist with stream erosion. A temporary
pump around with upstream and downstream dikes will be used to construct the stream crossing under dry conditions. Additionally, per the project
engineer: The proposed road culvert was placed in a location that conforms to the epsting topography on site and meets NCDOT Standards and
Specifications for both horizontal and vertical alignment geometry. Due to the constraining parcel boundary south of the proposed crossing and
epsting topography in the region of the crossing, the road culvert could not be positioned farther east to minimize the stream impacts without creating
excess fill discharge within the stream and riparian buffer.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing and silt fence outlets, as well as plunge pools at erosion phase for diffuse flow. Check dams to reduce velocities. A temporary pump
around for the stream crossing will be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
C Yes o No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:

Permanent loss stream impacts are less than 150 Linear Feet. Impacts have been avoided to the mapmum extent practicable. Therefore compensatory mitigation in the form of
mitigation payment has not been proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes o No
What type of SCM are you providing?
m Level Spreader
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
P_190126_POSTDRAINAGE-X300.pdf 1.59MB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
0 Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
o Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes a No
o N/A- project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
12 Local Government ❑ State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
m Phase II m NSW ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply
Please identifywhich local government stormwater program you are using.
Johnston County
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
O Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
a Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
o Yes (D No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural
and silvicultural operations. The Pierce Landing project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Garner ETJ,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Neuse
River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area, in addition Best
Management Practices may be required that control nitrogen if diffuse flowcannot be achieved; 2) the Phase II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program,
this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater
management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Issewage disposal required by DWR forth is project?*
a Yes C No C N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater will be generated and treated by private septic systems.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
o Yes C No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
a Yes C No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
C Yes C No Q Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C Yes c No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
a Yes C No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
C Yes G, No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
a Yes o No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
C Yes a No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?*
SREC completed a Threatened R Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish R Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on
September 23, 2020. The USFWS has 30 days to respond from the date of the sent request. SREC received no response from USFWS within the 30
days meaning that they concurred with the determinations made by SREC that the proposed actions is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed
endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species
Act (ESA). Please see attached SREC Threatened R Endangered Species report.
Consultation Documentation Upload
SREC Pierce Road Tract THE Report Signed.pdf 11.74MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
C Yes o No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
C Yes a No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on September 2, 2020, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
0 Yes o No

8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
. I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
. I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Deborah E. Shirley
Signature
tea%
Date
1 1 /17/2020

Deborah Shirley
From: Steven Ball
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 11:19 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA)
Cc: Josh Harvey
Subject: RE: SAW-2020-00810--Pierce Road Tract / Garner NC / Johnston County
Attachments: Post USACE site map.pdf
Chris,
Attached is the updated sketch map per or site visit yesterday. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Steven Ball, RF, PWS
NC Registered Forester #1723
Professional Wetland Scientist #2732
Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Mobile-919-691-2114
Off ice-919-846-5900
Visit us at Sandec.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 7:18 AM
To: Steven Ball <[e-mail]>
Cc: Josh Harvey <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2020-00810--Pierce Road Tract / Garner NC / Johnston County
Thanks, Steven:
This one actually looks good to me. It doesn't appear you'd be excluding (f.k.a. isolating) anything. If you'd like to discuss
something specific I'm glad to meet you there, but I'm comfortable desktopping it too. Let me know what works best for
you.
Christopher D. Hopper
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 35
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can
be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete
the survey.
-----Original Message-----

From: Steven Ball <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 2:03 PM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Josh Harvey <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: SAW-2020-00810--Pierce Road Tract / Garner NC / Johnston County
Importance: High
Hey Chris, also wanted to check on this one down in Johnston Co. Its been out there for a bit. Just wanted to make sure
you got this.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks!
Steven Ball, RF, PWS
NC Registered Forester #1723
Professional Wetland Scientist #2732
Soil and Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
Mobile-919-691-2114
Off ice-919-846-5900
Visit us at Sandec.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Thames, Joyce A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:19 AM
To: Josh Harvey <[e-mail]>
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: SAW-2020-00810--Pierce Road Tract / Garner NC / Johnston County
Importance: High
Mr. Harvey,
I mistakenly overlooked your email address, please see message below for the Pierce Road Tract Project.
Thanks
-----Original Message -----
From: Thames, Joyce A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2020 9:17 AM
To: Steven Ball <[e-mail]>
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: SAW-2020-00810--Pierce Road Tract / Garner NC / Johnston County
Importance: High
We received your Jurisdictional Determination (JD) request. We have assigned the request this file number SAW-2020-
00810 and forwarded the project to (Christopher Hopper) for further processing, please refer to this file number on all
correspondence.
(Submittal Website) [e-mail] <mailto:Raleigh [e-mail]>
Also, please feel free to contact assigned Project Manager above via email if you have any questions or concerns.
2

Sincerely,
Joyce A. Thames

;oil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls ofNeuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 276IS • Phone: ()19) 840-1900 • Fav [phone]
sandccxom
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Pierce Road Tract S&EC Project # 13941
Date: � lq 10
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Chris Hopper Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 162700-25-1293
Site Address: North of Pierce Road
City, County, State: Garner, Johnston County, NC, 27529
Name: �-LZ , dba (e P P-A k8 (- M,0
Mailing Address: J:�JlS .�- K)(,0SC i _ 2,0I
Telephone Number: I — 0E'S -- tn;-14 5 �'
Email: _ C PtM-er , '1 t-,0 (P _1-12<rrAntor ko vlAp,S, (f,>Yo
Applicant (please printA Date
Applicant Signature
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge,

FGFND-
i ./N
EXISTING STREAM
EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER
z
7
(In- / I I / �p
z
In�111/<< \\
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
I \
' EXISTING 8" PVC WATER MAIN \ \ \ — — — — — _ — — ` / / ( ( / / ` J / / / I ( / - - - - - - /- - - -
It
cc
DO co DO co 00
o/ / /
/i i -/� N l - �_ „N, o _ J/ /�� �\ I /- \ \ \ \ I / /i/ _/
/ / / / / / / /� /o J \ — / / \ \ \ I r. \ — EXISTING WETLAND "W3" . — / ^ I l I
/ / o \ \ I/ �/. j _
EXISTING JOHNSTON COUNTY ESA LINE `
o/ \ I IFS
1 / l III q //// // l // / / / / t \ ctioti`q \ \ \\ I Il .
\ I I \ \\ \----, \ FS ♦ I- -I- ----�:-
---- �---
/ �� / I I I // / / / /// / / / / l I I / / / / / / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \. ` . �. f PROJECT PARCEL BOUNDARY
PROJECT PARCEL BOUNDARY N.
1IIII11 //�
I/ I( \ I ///// \ \ \ \ \ \___-_ \ _ -�
\\ � \ \ � � - /I I / III/ \ I IN
I � I �I III Ilfl(l lI l/I11/IIII 1 \IIII l l I \ I \ (/ / ��-\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � � \ � \ \ � ��, � l l/ l/ I I / l/ I-L���-... I I ICI I I I I
!
APPX. 50
' JURISDICTIONAL BUFFER;jN /
< \ \ \ \ \\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ ) I / � / �/
\
30' RIPARIAN ZONE 1 TYP.) �—
I�IIIII111 / I/ ( /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I o \ \ I I \ ♦ ! I / 20' RIPARIAN ZONE 2 (TYP.) I�
I�
`� 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 \ \ / \ \\ \ l( / I I I 4-1
\ I II I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I L \ \ l L — / \ \ \ l EXISTING POND "2" \
\ \ I 1 I l l I ( 1 \\\ \\\\ \� I I I I I I l/// \ \ \ I I I I I III I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 { \ \ \ \ \ \ - - ♦ / \ \ \ 1 l ( TOP OF BANK LINE
\ \ \IIIIII \\ \\ \\\\\\>>I 11 ///// /(\ 1 I I I I I I I I III I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 \ \� \- - \ ♦ \ \ \ \ \ III J
•APPX.TREE LINE \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ � �` � \ � \ \ \ \ \ I (III r I � �,
30' RIPARIAN ZONE 1 (TYP.) o \
�
12O' RIPARIAN ZONE 2 (TYP.)\\
\ , \ ; \ \ 111 I/ IIIIIIIII I III I 1 I I \ � -- J � / / l l /l l l l Ill\\_\ \
> l / lllllll� \\\\III 11111 JJ)1111I111 I I I I I I I \ \ I �, \� \\ `\-- _/ / I I — \ \ \\_U
/l III/1ll IIII I I I I I I / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \
`0.
If
EXISTING WETLAND "W4"
\\\ \\ill I (IIIIII I l
\ l
\\\1
\
EXISTING STREAM „A.
------ -----
/
50' JURISDICTIONAL BUFFER \
II ��NI
TO
II EXISTING WETLANDS
II 11�,11 P OF BANK (TYP.) EXISTI
III IIII II W2 1111 I 1 EXISTING WETLANDS "" \\ \ \\� 30' RIPARIAN ZONE 1 TYP. —
1 \20'RIPARIAN ZONE 2 (TYP—)
I I/lj I (IIII 1111\ \ \ �— == ✓ .I // /Q
'50JURISDICTIONAL `�
o
I
I II I II 111 II_-�50-' JU\-\RI\S_D„\IC�TIONAL BUFFER
_ oSTREAM CENTERLINE (TYP.o
EXISTING WETLANDS "W1
i
2 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 2ND SUBMITTAL 09/09/2020
1 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 1ST SUBMITTAL 04/24/2020
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISIONS
EXISTING STREAM , % �� %i �/� /// / /\� \� \ �\ — — o
o
o
P \ \ \ No
CT
1�1\ �\ PAOND ToI BE DRAINED \ \\\\ \\I
I J/ AND FILLED \ \\ \ \
\\\\\
/ / — o
0
�� co
o
0 0
0
150 0 150 300
1 "=150'
A
=
cn
Q)
rn
co
VO
O
I,-
U
rl-
'
(.%)
E
— N
W
0
Z
X U
x
LL_ Z
Q)
CL
O
N
>
Q
o
I-- J
LO w
rn U
M Z
Ln
f6
Q)
�
E
N
LO
t ^
N
w
m
V
z_
0
z
Q
J
W
U
V )
z
w
2
D
U
0
0
z
0
U
D
C)
z
0
U
V
z
vJ
(Dz
X0
w �
J 0
J z
Qp
0�U
W
0
� }
Q N D
pU0
�zU
vzz0
wJ()
aw=
J 0
U
Project Engineer:
SSL
Designed By:
TEP
Drawn By:
TEP
Checked By:
SSL
Scale:
1" = 150'
Date:
09/09/2020
Project Number: P190126
SHEET
SHEET 1

1 r/"rklrl_
1\\\\111
�N ••C A•R 0��
i 1,�.
N EXISTING STREAM
EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER
PROPOSED OPEN SPACE
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
PROPOSED STOP/STREET SIGN
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED EASEMENT
303 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOT
— — — — — — — PROPOSED SETBACK
2 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 2ND SUBMITTAL 09/09/2020
1 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS 1ST SUBMITTAL 04/24/2020
REV DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISIONS
A
�
cn
L
rn
M
N
O
V
�
.o
o
U
rl-
(%)
0i M
N
0
Z
X U
X
x
LL Z
Q)
(3)o�
N
>
Q
o
a
o w
V
z
r�-�
N
f6
�
LO
N
LO
�,.� ^
N
w
C)
z
W
Z
0
U
O
�}
Z
z
0
Q N 0
Q
Z
OUO
�zU
J
O
w0Z
0
W
~
wJ
a>=
U
U
w0
C)
z
�
O
U
150 0 150 300
1 "=150'
z
Q
J
n
W
C)
J
J
Q
ry
W
O
Project Engineer:
SSL
Designed By:
TEP
Drawn By:
TEP
Checked By:
SSL
Scale:
1" = 150'
Date: 09/09/2020
Project Number: P190126
SHEET
SHEET 2

SITE VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1 "=1,000'
REGIONAL TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE: 1 "=200'
ADDITIONAL CONTRACTOR WORKING AREA Y
NCDOT APPROVED PREFAB ALUMINUM HEADWALL
— — — — SEDIMENT DIKE
2.25 FT THICK CLASS 1 DISSIPATER PAD
(TOP BURIED TO EXISTING STREAM BED ELEVATION)
' 52 FT.\ 1
_285
egg_ _ = 30' RIPARIAN ZONE 1 (TYP.)'
- —_20' RIPARIAN ZONE 22 (TYP.)' 1 \ \
A--285--
x-
STREAM CENTERLINE (TYP.)
43 FT. _ / STREAM TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
10
1 09/
34 FT.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
/
STREAM „B"
/ TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
UNTIL STABILIZED
/i -z—
CLEAN WATER DIKE
NCDOT APPROVED PREFAB ALUMINUM HEADWALL .
TO BE BURIED 9.6" (20%)
71
zs'
STREAM IMPACT MAP
SCALE: 1 "=50'
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
ZONE 1 TOTAL IMPACTS:
8,445 SF
0.194 AC.
PERMANENT:
8,445 SF
0.194 AC.
ZONE 2 TOTAL IMPACTS:
2,195 SF
0.050 AC.
PERMANENT:
2,195 SF
0.050 AC.
STREAM TOTAL IMPACTS:
207 LF
1,162 SF
PERMANENT:
129 LF
730 SF
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ PERMANENT - NO PERMANENT LOSS:
68 LF
376 SF
TEMPORARY:
10 LF
56 SF
a
C v
O
U � o
• U m
d r
N L s�LL
U z
E
t N
m
� w
00
k.:jm
QX ON
Z W ❑N,
Q ,Zo
J 190
W
wz w
c- a w =
v�
W U
aQ
0
c\j CD
Lu O N
w
v
o
O o rn
z o, E:
Qo
U
w
�
J
W
O
Q
C
w
C/)
�
H
co
n
�
m
�
00
m
w
00
mw
z
z
�
�
U
co
Lu
ui
w
_

IVIED SEDIMENT FILTERING DEVICE
IEKT FILTER BAG). PROVIDE
VE DRAINAGE FROM SEDIMENT
BAG TO STREAM.
DISCHAR!FRAP
NTO
STABLE
PAO TOVENT
SCOUR
IN
FTAW - SEDIMEN'
DICE—
STATION
PIERCE LANDING DRIVE- PROFILE
HOR. SCALE: 1 "=100' VER. SCALE: 1 "=10'
STA: 6+50 - 13+75
UTGE HOSES
P
DEWATERIVNG PUMP INTAKE HOSE
INTAKE CLEAN WATER
HOSE DIKE SUMP -HOLE FOR POOL
(12 TO 1S- DEEP, 2-FT DIAMETER)
7EIpfMIARY PUMP AR[WINQ SEQUENCE
1. SET UP PUNP WTH SUCTION AND DISCHARGE HOSE.
2 INSTALL UP -STREAM SANDBAG CAW.
I INSTALL DOWN-SIREAM SANDBAG DAM.
4. THE PUMP MUST RUN CONTINUOUSLY WHILE WORKING IN THE STREAM.
A STREAMBANKS MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH DAY.
ES
ANDBAG DIKES SHALL BE SITUATED AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE WORK AREA, AND STREAM FLOW
SHALL BE PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREAL THE PUMP SHOULD DISCHARGE ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY DISSIPATER
CONSTRUCTED OF RIPRAP OR SANDBAGS
VATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE SUCH AS A SEDIMENT BAD OR OTHEI
APPROVED DEVICE. THE MEASURE SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THE WATER DRAINS BACK INTO THE CHANNEL BELOW THI
DOWNSTREAM SANDBAG DIKE WTHOUT CAUSING FURTHER EROSION BETWEEN THE SEDIMENT FILTER BAG AND THE STREAMBA
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND
m
D
O
z
PREFAB ALUMINUM HEADWI
48" PREFAB
0+
)4000.H
WIiiM N A N
EXISTING STREAM BED
PROPOSED DISSIPATER PAD
TO BE BURIED TO EXISTING
STREAM BED
DISSIPATER PAD DETAIL
m
75
m
r
m
G
70
U)
W
J_
u-
0
a_
Z
o
cl
r
` 7 NI-
Z
Q N 7
U) �ZO
J
J do
Lu
Q H
ww
U
F- aZ
W Lu
N
LL
0 U
w
a
�
U
Q
a_
2
0 o
LLJ O CV
65 c\j co
o N
Z o m
Q CD
•E
55
STATION
STREAM CROSS SECTION - PROFILE
HOR. SCALE: 1 "=100' VER. SCALE: 1 "=10'
STA: 0+00 - 2+29
U
Ijj LLI
O
U Q
c
J � � J
co � co
m m
o o
w m w
z z
O � U
c q LLI
w LLI =

6; (do " W", f 14
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
POST OFFICE BOX 2263
SMITHFIELD, N.C. 27577
[phone]
July 1, 2020
Steven Ball
Soil and Environmental Consultants (S&EC)
8412 Falls of Neuse Rd
Raleigh, NC 27615
Subject: Neuse River Buffer Call
NBR# NB 20-018
Project Name: Pierce Rd Tract (NC Pin# 162700-25-1293)
Location / Directions: 475 Pierce Rd
Subject Stream: F-A UT to Buffalo Branch (C; NSW)
F-B UT to Buffalo Branch (C; NSW)
F-C UT to Buffalo Branch (C; NSW)
F-D UT to Buffalo Branch (C; NSW)
Pond-1 UT to Buffalo Branch (C; NSW)
Pond-2 UT to Buffalo Branch (C; NSW)
Determination Date: July 1, 2020 Staff. Charles Pender
USGS
Latitude
Longitude
Feature
Not
Subject
Subject
Start cr
Stop @
Soil
Survey
(Dec.
(Dec.
Topo
Degrees)
Degrees)
F-A
®
Throughout
n/a
®
®
35°36.363'
078-35.570'
Subject at
orange
F-B
®
flagging
n/a
®
®
35-36.234'
078-35.215'
F-C
®
Not subject
n/a
®
®
35-36.104'
078-35.506'
Printed on recycled paper ow
V.0

F-D
®
Not subject
n/a
®
35-25.995'
078-25.847'
Pond-
Subject.
®
Conceded
n/a
1
by applicant
Not subject.
Pond-
®
❑
Not
connected to
n/a
®
35-36.094'
078-35.506'
2
a subject
feature.
*E/I/P = Ephemeral /b7terinittent/Per•ennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above that are checked "Subject" to the Johnston County Neuse Riparian
Buffer Ordinance (Section 14-393 Johnston County Code of Ordinances) has or have been approximately shown
on either the Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina (1994) or the most recent version of the 1:24,000
(7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic maps prepared by the United States Geologic Survey (USGS), and have
been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. There may be other
streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but still may be considered
jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by Johnston County may request a determination by the
Director of the Division of Water Resources c/o the 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, or its successor. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of the date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a
determination by the Director must be submitted in writing with a copy of this letter to:
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, a request for an appeal has been made in
writing within sixty (60) days.
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
(stated above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries
should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office at [phone]
and the Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit at [phone].

If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Charles Pender at (919) 209-
8333 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
G
Charles Pender, Jr.
Engineering and Environmental Technician

W
c�
Q
z
ry
co
O
d
I
N
al
w
N
N
U
0
U
C
a)
C
0)
LLI
0
O
ry
(1)
D
o_
N
0
U
a�
2
rn
0
N
1 REV
DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
IIII\ W
��-
7
--------------
00
oCD LLJ
Q J , Q ( /
- _ - 2.19 ELEVATION: 332'
CD
----------------
'ELEVATION: 327' ' �� ' �` . ��========n...�==_'_'�_==_'__`__====== ==_ =- � - /
a 600 SF 4,600 SF ,600 SF `I� ____ _ = =___LLI/
- \ / //� / I I � - •asoosF \.,* =--------------------
4,600 SF
/ G / Q� 10- DR W E AREA _
CO OJ CO _ CO / TOTAL, �2.7 AC. • . • -}-}- _}-_�_
O - / O O T AVG.
MIN
,� + 4,600 SF •` \I ________ __= WOODED _ _ _ ___ ___ ___ _ _ _ ___ _
I C C .55 I -__
CO O 4,600 / I (25 YR) = 7.76 INIHR .rr _ _- =r _-_ _- _ =x _ __ I O /
\ I / / / O
\ l I SITE DRAINAGE AREA 2 / / / O / O
III QC' / � � / � � � � a,soo sF . a,soo sF a,soo sF . �� � - W • � • W - � • '-_ _F_= = ow /
ITOTAL AREA- 63.40 AC. / I / / / O / / / / / / / O / O / / O W 1\\ W .� _ _ -_ - ____-_____ _-_ _____-___ �O r= _= r =_ ==_L- I
2.14 AC. ROAD / I / / / / 4,600 SF W - ___ _ _}_}__ _____ --- - - _ - _-_ / O I 7.92 AC. HOUSE / 1 (/
I I I I 23.61 AC. GRASS 4,600 SF rf
I 29.73 AC. WOODS SWAL INA E ARE
J CN (GROUP B SOILS) / I I I I I I _ . . . .
= 98 ROAD, HOUSE ///yr I I AREA-1.4y AC // / I SWALE
61 (GRASSED ) / / / / / DRAINAGE
AREA (TYP.)
55 (WOODS) 1 I �
18.53 MIN (KIRPICH) I I I I , y^,REAW .37 piE\ I' �. . �. . 1 • . _ - __-}?- _}_ - -_ =v _ - _}____= WI I I
P (1 YR) = 3.20 IN I / I 1
Q 1 YR = 31.66 CFS / 1 I W L INA EAR SWALED F3AINAGE
( ) ROAD SIDE DITCH 1 ' I • / • . /. P�REA-.71'2
09-P DRAINAGE AREA
/ / I DRAINAGE AREAI. I - W d +• _-- -
/ TO POND - I / U TOTAL AREA = 5.44 AC. 5WA E DRAINCyE AREA
/ I A - 1.31 W SITE DRAINAGE AREA 3 __ --- COI
4,600 SF 4,600 SF 4,600 SF ' 4,600 SF ' 4,600 SF 4,600 SF
TOTAL AREA = 17.45 AC. I / / / / / • 4,600 SF = \ - AR 54'A,p . \ ' . \� • +'' •` __ _ =r= __ __ r == I \ 0.97 AC. ROAD � � r TC = 5 MIN TOTAL AREA = 18.52 AC. _ _ _ N
I( / ,\ 4,600 SF 1 (25 YR) 8.45 IN/HR IIIN�� I 4,600 SF 0.41 AC. ROAD
3.90 AC. HOUSE 1 I 4,600 SF \. .\. . �.�_ II _
12.58 AC. GRASS ((// �� \� \ Q (25 YR) = 16.32 CFS
- I 1 I I ���_ � 7 9.01 / ( � CN (GROUP BSOILS) - � � I p p � I � � '\ � � � I /
1 98 (ROAD, HOUSE) ^ ��' 4 600 SF W 4,600 SF 9.01 AC. WOODS
08-P DRAINAGE AREA
61 (GRASSED) t l ` I 4,600 SF sJ '
TOTAL AREA = 7.41 AC. `- 4,600 SF 4,600 SF 1. 4,600 SF 98 (ROAD, HOUSE)
TC = 5.85 MIN (KIRPICH) f •' { _ 4,600 SF I�
11 P (1 YR) - 3.20 IN `• �-= C AVG. _ .37
\ \ 1 \ \ \ l Q (1 YR) = 23.72 CFS (HELD IN POND) '� ( \ \ \ �� TC = 8.04 MIN
\ \• 25 YR-7.651N/HR I `1 ` ` I \ \ \• � � / \ ( ) -
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ l POST -POND TOTAL = 7.94 CFS .� • � 4 -�� ' q,600 26.28
W j� Q (1 YR) = 26.28 CFS � _�
\ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ •\+ \ .4,600 SF , ✓4,600 SF 4,600 SF , 4,600.SF 4,600 SF 4,600 SF _ _ -
\ � TO POND
1 I I O •� r l f I J �� 07-P DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL AREA = 4.39 AC. _�-- _ __- = Q I
1 I 1 -
1 I A SW E D INAGE ARC•
mac• __ >
I 1 I I I I I I` �. I I \. 1 •I . I I IAR=65A • TOTAL AREA=2.21 AC. L _ _ _ _ _ 041 AC ROAD
• L87
I I I � •`� •�• � C AVG. =.41 '' `• � •�W ELEVATION: 305'� o O
I \ 4 600 SF
TC = 5.00 MIN 'W �, 2S) AC. GRASS
\. W 4,600 SF 4,600 SF - - -
I I (25 YR) = 8.45 IN/HR 4,600 SF \ W W . CN (GROUP C SOILS)
II l \J I 222 __ W
\ I\ 1 \ l \ \ I •) / •, •)• ) I . • \ � Q (25 YR) - 7.67 CFS 4,600 SF ' 1. �• � � . `1 ' . _r- -}-} 98 (ROAD, HOUSE) __ =_rr rrrrrrrr CO \ /
r . � . . ♦ . �� . � � � � TC - 5.20 MIN (KIRPICH)
\ \ --P DRAINAGE AREA 1 \ . ` �\ ' �_ _} -- _=}_}- -} P (1 YR) = 3.20 IN
AL AR
8.53 AC. I I \ \ W W •` Q (1 YR)- 10.85 CFS (HELD IN POND)
_ l
Vc. _ .3s I ELEVATION: 330'-====_ _= ===== ==- ==== ==
5.00 MIN
\ \ \ \ IIIIIIIII I I SWALE DRAINAGE AREA RSF
I 1 II LS YR) = 8.45 IN/HR I,AREA J = 4 C 11I-
\ 1 1 I I -Q(25 YR)=26.06 CFS �. _ _____ \
----- -- -------- -=====- === = == _ ====_ ==-=======_ __
\ \ \ 1 I I I � /' /' � �. ' . ♦. \ == === === ===��='=======- ===========_ __ ____=_--- -- ELEVATION: 304' {
ELEVATION: 264' �, •% - -% • . • swF�LE L�F2AIIJAGEREAW �/ W . asoosF / ' /
/ AR A=1' 27
I II / / / II / � •.,•.i. •./.•.•.,. .•.•. U. / \ \� � -_= I o /� � J � ANALYSISPOINT3 � \ �� f \
4,600 SF 4,600 SF q 600 SF 4,600 SF 4,600
✓ J ' IIJ I III ' I I I I I I / // ., . � �. 4,600 SF 4,600 SF / � \ \ \ \O O � �
4,600 SF � �\ _ _ /- •-- , ______= 1 \ O 1 � � � / / \
- III ` o l � i• �., \ . l - \ � -_�___ '7"`� I I \
4,600 SF I II
�!: I . I / I \ \ ♦ ====== I \ I i�i� - ] 1
i \ \ �' 4,6 10 SF 4,600 SF 4,600 SF 4,600 SF 4,600 SF 4,600 SF • �--
•as\sF. .,J' \ ♦ ter- I 1 /ice _- \ \ / / i
/ / / // / , \ \ \ \ \ I I I /. I I \ �l \� . \` •\.� - GRASSED
� I �/// it i \\ �, \• '�' .- .-• � •.•.• •�� �' � --- \ �== I � �_-�yV/�j .� \ / I
ROAD SIDE DITCI � � � ROAD SIDE DITCH 3'-
DRAINAGE AREA \\/� \�
I / DRAINAGE AREA-
/ A = .27 AC. \\\ A = .25 AC.
4,600 SF ��� A�i j � WOODED � \\ � � ���
\\��� ��;- = ��\��-=___--__-_ �;
II1�I( \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4,600SF�� �\� --- `L=3,665' �- `� N
.'i IIIoil/,,/
CAR "l
;�` �o •,••'F ES Sao'••,?9'�%
s : 027388
'n %�9/04/20�Q-
,,
�
N
co
r-
N
_
O
V
.o
o
rl-
>
U
00
�
M
0
rn U
X
Z
x
LL Z
fl
o
>
Q
o
�rLL
>
LO w
.�
,
Q
CF) U
V°'
0-)Z
N
LO
N
Ln
�,.� ^
N
�V
w
V /
Z
U w
Q
D
0 �z
p foolo�::)
QO
z
z � _U
0 0 woz
N - wJ0
LL a ; _
W U wo
U D
W F-oo
z
0
U
lx� �-`� =' % %��- _� %%' _-- -
/ / I 1 \ �_ - - ��\V 05-P DRAINAGE AREA
y I i ROAD SIDE DITCH 5 TOTAL AREA 31.71 AC.
DRAINAGE AREA / TC - 10.74 MIN
\ / A - .22 AC. -�� \ 1 / I (25 YR) = 7.05 INIHR
ROAD SIDES ADRI�Ii� � � �/ . �' - �Q(25YR) = 69.54CF� � V - - �� / V
i - y�cLU
11 Al
ELEVATION: 24\l8r
/�� '4,600sF I coo
/ ANALYSIS POINT 2
/� / �/ / ' / / / / / / / • / / 03 P DRAINAGE AREA -
//TOTAL AREA= 1.25 AC. \ CO 1
IT
= 5.00 MIN \ /
4,600 SF___ \ (25 YR) = 8.45 IN/HR
\ Q (25 YR) = 3.43 CFS-
/\\ _ ` • ' ` X'== -= LEGEND:
Q
. DRAINAGE AREA
PIPE/DITCH
TOTAL AREA =4.78 AC.
\CA GV DRAINAGE
TC = 5.00 MIN AREA (TYP.) - - -/
---------- ___ __- I �h` \1 (25 YR) = 8.45 IN/HR
/ / // / I �---____- •��00 SF�• -_ \ Q(25YR) 16.01CFS % EXISTING STREAM LU
ELEVATION: 272' - \ \ � � � � _ � / .�
__- I a"o EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER O
'y'====__ - „GRASSED \. \. �- - - _ _ \
-- 4,600 SF \ \ \ / � Z
ANALYSIS POINT 1 _- _ =_=_ ____ `{ ' '\' \ \ \ \ 01-P DRAINAGE AREA AC. - �- ' / - - _ - - \ Project Engineer: SSL
// // / /�� - _ - _ ______ % •, �, \.\. 1�C AVG.
- _ _ - _ _ _ - PROPOSED OPEN SPACE
TC = 5.00 MIN
WOODED125 YR-8.451N/HR - - - - -
Q(25YR)=6.08CFS - - c9 Designed By: TEP
.asoosF v PROPOSED PAVEMENT
z Drawn By: TEP
SITE DRAINAGE AREA 1 / / W ��.�., W . T W •` +I I I / / ' - J / i �- // /\ O
TOTAL AREA= 6.43AC.�` }�.I� / \ -� /� /\ Checked By: SSL
0.43 AC. ROAD -/ . � I ' � ' ` / /
0.52 AC. HOUSE �= i / �_
1 3.25AC.GRASS 4,so0SF' PROPOSED STOP/STREET SIGN
3.25 AC. WOODS . - . - . - ... ,
I /
`'= •.� W / / / - _ / Scale: 1" = 150'
CN (A SOILS) ' -DRAINAGE AREA _ L� / / / U
98 ROAD, HOUSE J TOTALAREA=2.92AC. y
39 (GRASSED) ) - / ✓ / - / PD
C AVG.=.427 \ /
TC = 5.00 MIN -
TC=53MIN(OODSCH) -\6/PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
YR) = 3.20 IN ILL
( (2 YR)) 810. 3 CF . . . . Q (1 YR) = 0.05 CFS Q (25 YR) = 10.53 CFS
I / o o J '- / G ELEVATION: 310' / / / / / ( I I / - Date: 09/04/2020
/ / \ \ Ir
Z PROPOSED EASEMENT
Project Number: P190126
o , // / / ,- I I �� �\ \ \ \ I (( 303 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOT SHEET
/
/ \ / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�• l 150 0 150 300
1 =150 - - PROPOSED SETBACK
DATE I \, \ \ � \.-„ � �. _� ,/ � .
X300
0_

To:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • lax: [919) 846-9467
sandec.com
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
September 14, 2020
S&EC Project No: 13941.W9
Re: Online Project Review Request, Pierce Road Tract, Garner - Johnston, North Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We completed
our review September 14, 2020 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with the
instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of. A planned residential development that is proposing impacts to a stream.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Pierce Road Tract (35.600753,-78.590561). The site is located at 475 Pierce Road, Garner, Johnston
County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 18, 2022.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Digitally signed by Mason Montgomery
Mason Montgomery
Date: 2020.09.14 14:39:08-04'00'
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Specialist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package 6. FWS Official Species List
2. S&EC T&E Species Report 7. N11P Report
3. Vicinity Maps 8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
4. S&EC Photo Report 9. FWS Self -Certification Letter
5. Overall Site Plan

Environmental Consultants,
8412 falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone
sandcc. com
September 14, 2020
S&EC ProjectNo.: 1394LW9
To: D.R Horton Company- Terramor Homes LLC
Attn: Cameron Jones
7208 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Pierce Road Tract (+/- 91 acres)
Pierce Road, Garner, Johnston County, NC, 27529
Dear Cameron Jones:
On August 19, 2020, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Pierce Road Tract
shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at 475 Pierce Road
in Johnston County, NC. Surface waters onsite flow into Buffalo Branch in the Neuse River Basin, which
has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and
Wetlands of North Carolina" as C; NSW.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types and looking for evidence of the listed species onsite. This survey did
not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Pierce Road Tract - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 6

September 14, 2020
S&EC Project #13941.W9
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Endangered
• Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Proposed Threatened
• Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Proposed Endangered
• Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Proposed Threatened
• Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon), Endangered
• Yellow Lance (Elliptio lanceolate), Threatened
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did not identify any Federally
threatened or endangered species within the project area or within 1 mile of the project area. Other
State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the attached NHP report. The NHP
report identified 2 managed areas within the project area or within 1 mile of the project area. These are
listed out in the attached NHP Report.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and
individual Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual
RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within 1 mile of the site. We found no ideal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine
forests) within the project area. The patches of Loblolly pine stands are too young (± 35 years old) to
be considered suitable habitat. There are also thinner young stands as well. Given the lack of species
present, and no presence of suitable habitat we concluded that the project would have "No effect" on
RCWs.
NEUSE RIVER WATERDOG (Necturus lewisa):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams onsite for potential suitable habitat for
the Neuse River Waterdog. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within 1 mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River basins.
The suitable habitat this species is found in is typically medium to large streams and rivers with a
Pierce Road Tract - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 6

September 14, 2020
S&EC Project #13941.W9
moderate gradient and large bed material. The Neuse River Waterdog also needs riffles, runs, and
pools. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any evidence of the
species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable habitat
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does exist onsite. The perennial stream
along the western property boundary was +/-8 feet wide with medium baseflow and had a sandy gravel
substrate. Additionally, the other perennial stream on site did not have suitable habitat. This stream is
+/- 4 feet wide with low baseflow and had a sandy gravel substrate. The proposed crossing will be
impacting the smaller perennial stream, which is believed to not be suitable habitat. Due to these
observations we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Neuse River Waterdog
CAROLINA MADTOM (Noturus furiosus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams onsite for potential suitable habitat for
the Carolina Madtom. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project
area or within 1 mile of the site. This species is found in the Neuse River and Tar River basins. The
suitable habitat this species is found in is also medium to large streams and rivers with a moderate
gradient and large bed material. The Carolina Madtom also needs continuous year-round flow, and
cover for nesting habitat. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any
evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable
habitat
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does exist onsite. The perennial stream
along the western property boundary was +/-8 feet wide with medium baseflow and had a sandy gravel
substrate. Additionally, the other perennial stream on site did not have suitable habitat. This stream is
+/- 4 feet wide with low baseflow and had a sandy gravel substrate. The proposed crossing will be
impacting the smaller perennial stream, which is believed to not be suitable habitat. Due to these
observations we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Carolina Madtom.
ATLANTIC PIGTOE (Fusconaia masona):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams onsite for potential suitable habitat for the
Atlantic Pigtoe (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of mussels).
Pierce Road Tract - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 6

September 14, 2020
S&EC Project #13941.W9
The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or within 1 mile of
the site. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized creeks to large rivers with
excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams with coarse sand and gravel with moderate
to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we also did not find any
evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams for potential suitable
habitat
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does exist onsite. The perennial stream
along the western property boundary was +/-8 feet wide with medium baseflow and had a sandy gravel
substrate. Additionally, the other perennial stream on site did not have suitable habitat. This stream is
+/- 4 feet wide with low baseflow and had a sandy gravel substrate. The proposed crossing will be
impacting the smaller perennial stream, which is believed to not be suitable habitat. Due to these
observations we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Atlantic Pigtoe.
DWARF WEDGEMUSSEL (Alasmidonta heterodon):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams onsite for potential suitable habitat for the
Dwarf Wedgemussel (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within 1 mile of the site. The Dwarf Wedgemussel has little to no preference for stream size, flow
condition or bed material. Due to this all the streams onsite could be considered suitable habitat, although
no mussels were observed during the preliminary suitable habitat survey.
Due to the potential suitable habitat onsite, we concluded that the project would "May affect, not likely to
adversely affect" the Dwarf Wedgemussel
YELLOW LANCE (ElHO& lanceolata):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the streams on site for potential suitable habitat for
the Yellow Lance (Note: This did not include a detailed aquatic mussel survey for the presence of
mussels). The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within 1 mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species consists of medium sized rivers and small
creeks with excellent water quality. This species typically lives in streams clean, coarse sand, and some
Pierce Road Tract - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 6

September 14, 2020
S&EC Project #13941.W9
gravel with moderate to high flowing water. While we did not specifically sample for the species, we
also did not find any evidence of the species while conducting our preliminary surveys of the streams
for potential suitable habitat
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat does exist onsite. The perennial stream
along the western property boundary was +/-8 feet wide with medium baseflow and had a sandy gravel
substrate. Additionally, the other perennial stream on site did not have suitable habitat. This stream is
+/- 4 feet wide with low baseflow and had a sandy gravel substrate. The proposed crossing will be
impacting the smaller perennial stream, which is believed to not be suitable habitat. Due to these
observations we have concluded that the project would have "No effect" on the Yellow Lance.
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests onsite or within 1 mile
of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is "Unlikely to disturb
nesting bald eagles ". We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Myotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no induvial species. Due to
the nature of the project being residential development, we concluded that the project would "May
affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter". Using language typically used by the
FWS in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Pierce Road Tract - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 6

Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason
Montgomery
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Specialist, Wetlands Department
September 14, 2020
S&EC Project #13941.W9
Digitally signed by Mason
Montgomery
Date: 2020.09.14 14:45:44
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. August 17, 2020.
6. NHP report re: August 17, 2020.
7. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. September 14, 2020.
8. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. September 14, 2020.
References:
-North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
-US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for the Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni). Version
1.2. March 2017. Atlanta, GA.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993. Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 30pp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2019. Carolina Madtom. Species Profile.
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/fishes/carolina-madtom/.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/ Southeast Region. 2019. Neuse River Waterdog. Species Profile.
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/amphibians/neuse-river-waterdog/
Pierce Road Tract - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 6 of 6

6
0
Fate:
ti—N�Ce6ter for'Gbographic Information & Analysi,ber: Map Title: N
13941.W9 0 1,000 2,000
ager:USGS MapI DS Pierce Road Tract Feet
Johnston County, NC
= 1000'Soil & Environmental, Consultants, P
Source: 2019 NC/31 /2020 Edmondson Quad Bill Felh TXeur•RoW. Ruec I4l, Rak gh.NC 7� l5. Ph— (919)gWy9 p.Fnx C 141AW-9
�em

- 0 0
COG
_ Ra �.
} NoB l
Wa IV oA -�
PaD IRa
_ _. - N oB
Bb
N kB
f .. cB
f 1V
CeC '
Ra
CeC r
Ce
wt - PaD
CeB r <9 Bb
. CeC,<z Pa
cec CeC f
Pa E
Pa
P E `t
o r Cep -
r ,f
PaD 'NC Center for Ge graphic Information & Anall
Project Number: SOII SurveyeSurveyMap Title: N
13941.W9 0 750 1,500
Project Manager: I I I I I I I I I
DS Pierce Road Tract Feet
Scale: 1750' Johnston County, NC
" =
Source: Johnston County Soil Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 Falls ofN.— Road, 6ui. 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Ph...: [phone] • Pas: [phone]
08/31/2020 Survey Sheet 5 neck —

' I 11IRi DR
Yy wA" 1 � •
'-F
1 0 -=
Photo 4
5 Photo
F VOILlow
�-
r 1 F dF-IJ I •' _ - O
�L f ' * •
• s � 'Fti• �' ' � .� .� Photo 3
Ik
i'
- a¢
Project No.
13941. W9
Project Mgr.:
IDS
Scale:
1" = 300'
08/31 /2020
0 300
N
W E
S
600
Feet
c
Ir
AWL
;I I
1,200
� Source:
Lhoto 7
Phot,
/ CD�00C-1 =��-
�t y Ila
ti.
J-%
Ed r_
rx *:
moo + Photo 8
Jnoto 9
' . ,'* '
r�
•i �l.� i i � i � �5 • � J` - -
eW A
Photo 11
f
I+ a -
Aerial Photo Map
Pierce Road Tract
Johnston County, NC
Aerials from NC One Map
it
Legend
Property Boundary
�co Potentially Jurisdictional Perennial Stream
moo Potentially Jurisdictional Intermittent Stream
Potentially Jurisdictional Pond
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
50' Neuse River Buffer
allll CX J"IIVITVIIIilCIlLal 17-M
H413 I all+ of 1Vcu.c Road, tiuitc I114, li:dcikii, N(: �7G l i + I Ixme: {J 19) f146-i9U0 • Fm O)119 94G--94G7
auider-enn

a
wr
77-.-
S5
cl
14
;A4
IL
lkz 4x.
Wlk
OIL k
4-1

•.
, 'ALL-
`1
a
�' :,tip"-� A �' ,r �.� � l..Y _ -�•'. r}��
1 r,
r st '1#�q• y r.. h ... ■, IPA
- - e #rig �i/./y `• '" "'*
4 � ny' 4•«4 ♦I� FC�,r}"�,ri �li'yyI/,1�.1 i !" L4f .0 is•Ja � i .
t r..
w �
II![[
10
Miu
tiff' ,
may.. Y•F.. �. .. ; '� .s' �� �• '� � f" - /t � r .� /
R.. ;` fir• � ( - ..� - ` _
[ ,00,
r

TM
r art
Y
Wk
•���..1\ � .-y. � F� .. %� J�+' •�� .. � � � i•. 1 � r `�f •e tee. � 1
�f�'• ia4'' . _ r �• ip .3� e 1 � ,1 � � R ' vk % >,_ .. J � i1i .
+1 ,t I � �- „ -s•F � }�� a % ice. x N � ��,� "' >ti � *.';
e
i A k may,}
I.'. e i- '•� .� ram' � ��

07-
..... .....
M-
io 11
AM%
rr
-zg

i i �Y jai e�'r' � �A �, � � r•� `� '� FYI � ��-. t� ! "�'' e,
el
4 � 9
-61
� 3

1 REV
f Cr'CAfn.
EXISTING STREAM
z
O
/ EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER
x
CD
PROPOSED OPEN SPACE cig
o
m
a
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY " I�-
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPOSED SETBACK
— — —�� - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
— —2�— — EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
245 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
244 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
z
n
v
Co
C4
SITE VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1 "=500'
U. "I l I I 0.46 AC - ' " �4o r i 20,496 -
3 26, 34 SF I (1 97 SF (9 960 SF) 19 947 SF) ( 9�4-S) (19,9 s� ( —
1 1 IIII I � / fc]
/ I I -
SF
z0 / 45 / / (b2//3$S)
II I I I I I IIIII III Ilf (�// �/ y / //
\\ \\ \ I `I I I I`
1 \ \\ \ \\\ \ \\\\\ I I \ 11 \ ,pc—
�\
-8.5fLAC :AC�T3�AC OF55 AC (24,
\ \\ \ 1\ I I \\\\ \�\\ \ \\ \ 87 \ \ \ \ \ 0.19 3 3 S ) \ (24,2234 SF 15 23 341 SF 2394FLSF)
11 \ \\ \\ \ \\\ \\\ N \ 4 �� \ _ �_ _ ,
(\Zb5\9a�s\F)\\\
-- —e__- --_ —__-
\ \ \\ \ 11 1 1 \ \ (�8,4.38S)----
Cb
\ 8-
\\ \\ \\ I 1 I 1\\\ \ \ \
1 \ 111 11 111 I l l l \ \ \ \ 0�z �\ \
\N,40SF)
IIIIIIII I Iljllllll\\1 z�n�
=- _
so
83
',•( I \ \\ \\ \\/" /, / /i/ / // / '` /ice /4
% / / // ///��/ // 85
// // /�/�� /i/
10
97 / / // yl/// //// / / // / / / /
28
s /!/
loll
,07
Q7 I I I I I I \ \ \ I
1(3341
\\\��_\_�______;
REGIONAL TOPOGRAPHY MAP
SCALE: 1 "=100'
DESCRIPTION j DATE 1 "=10' 10 0 10 20
REVISIONS
IMPACT SUMMARY TABLE
ZONE 1 FILL DISCHARGE:
5,312 SF
0.12 AC.
ZONE 2 FILL DISCHARGE:
2,229 SF
0.05 AC.
ZONE 1 DISSIPATER IMPACT:
852 SF
0.02 AC.
STREAM BED:
127 LF
/
— — -
/
/
/
— / / PLL
— — — — — — — — — — —
/
— — — — — — — — — — — — ------
— — 2 I -
— 20' RIPARIAN ZONE
_ — — 8" DIP WATER MAIN I(
30' RIPARIAN ZONE I — — . — J / — \ \ \ 61 • \`
PROPOSED DISSIPATER PAD _ — -
- — — — — BURIED FLUSH WITH STREAM BED
Jill(
V\
6 / 0 /
PLUNGE POOL
/I /
NCDOT PRECAST HEADWALL
\ _ SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
STREAM BOTTOM AND TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
/
3p \ / — / / /' / / / / PLUNGE POOL
/
STREAM IMPACT MAP
SCALE: 1 "=20'
PLACE GROOVE OR
BELL END OF PIPE
TO FACE OF WALL
I I I I
I I I I = o
ti
PLAN
FOOTING
G M G
I I
I I
L DOWEL
OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT
ELEVATION
(IF CONST. JOINT IS USED)
/ / g
PLUNGE POOL
0,73 AC
/�2013SF)
/
eK
SLOPE AS INDICATED ON PLANS
i S
T
CONC.
\ PIPE � #4-BARS
BT
END ELEVATION
DOWELS IN ENDWALL WITH REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PIPE
SINGLE PIPE
DOUBLE PIPE
LOC.
DIA.
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
15"
18"
24"
30"
36"
42"
48"
BARS
"X"
"X"
"X"
"X"
"X"
"X"
Y*
"X"
Y*
"X"
"X"
"X„
"X"
"X"
"X„
Y*
"X"
Y*
G
QTY.
2
2
3
3
4
4
2
5
2
2
2
3
3
4
4
2
5
2
M
QTY.
-
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
G
QTY.
1 2
1 2
1 3
3
4
4
5
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
TOTAL LBS.
9
9
14
14
19
55
65
1 12
1 12
1 19
19
23
77
92
DIMENSIONS AND CONCRETE QUANTITIES
USING CONCRETE PIPE
COMMON DIMENSIONS
SINGLE PIPE
DOUBLE PIPE
D
H
B
G
T
S
L
YD3
M
L
YD3
15"
3'-3"
1'-8"
2'-9"
21/4"
91/2"
5'-6"
0.7
2'-2"
7'-8"
1.0
18"
3'-7"
1'-10"
3'-2"
2%2"
10"
6'-4"
1.0
2'-7"
8'-11"
1.3
24"
4'-2"
2'-1"
4'-0"
3"
10"
8'-0"
1.5
3'-5"
11'-5"
2.0
30"
5'-0"
2'-6"
4'-7"
41/4"
111/2"
9'-2"
2.3
4'-3"
13'-5"
3.1
36"
5'-8"
2'-8"
5'-6"
43/4"
11%2"
11'-0"
3.4
5'-0"
16'-0"
4.5
42"
6'-2"
3'-1"
6'-4"
51/4"
11%2"
12'-8"
4.5
5'-10"
18'-6"
6.0
48"
6'-9"
1 3'-5"
1 7'-2"
1 53/4"
111/2"
14'-4"
6.0
6'-8"
21'-0"
8.0
*SEE SHEET 3
z
o C/)
aQ
H V
LLJ�I—Iz
Oo�=
cc Z
Q L) O H
F— M = LU
U)—LLOJ
cr 0 U)
z H �
C H
1UJ
W
J
0
Z LU
o U) LU CC u
0
< cc 0
LL +
o J a LU
cc
o3a�
z
W
�
W m d
LU
o W ~
v Z `n
O T
0
SHEET 1 OF 3
838.01
04tiy'"±}poplN ��f'r
`4
' 20234 -
�
N
L
O
(�
—
r`
N
°O
0
c`a
U
r--�
olo
0
C.,)
U
O
LL Z
Q-
Q
o
o
L
LL
>
w
•�
V
Q
��z
U
7a)-
o
E
N
't
�tw
N
w
m
vJ
Z
U w
Q
I..L
U LO
O Q N
0 pU0
Q z � z U
O O
Sao
w J (n
LUU aw=
UO
U �
W C/)
z
0
U
Project Engineer:
TSS
Designed By:
TEP
Drawn By:
TEP
Checked By:
TSS
Scale:
V. = 10'
Date: 03/25/2020
Project Number: P190126
SHEET
C550

M.
Fw�ra � tttuat��-�
United States Department of the Interior
J FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office '
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: August 17, 2020
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1677
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823
Project Name: Pierce Road Tract
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

08/17/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratory birds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

08/17/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

08/17/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/17/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1677
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823
Project Name: Pierce Road Tract
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: Project is located off of Pierce Road, Garner, Johnston County, NC
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/35.60379717694158N78.58960888617054W
Counties: Johnston, NC

08/17/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

08/17/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03823
4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12683
August 17, 2020
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE. Pierce Road Tract, 13941.W9
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Pierce Road Tract
Project No. 13941.W9
August 17, 2020
NCNHDE-12683
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
Element Accuracy Federal
State
Global
State
Group WOb7servation
Occurrence Status
Status
Rank
Rank
M
Rank
i
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre
H? 5-Very ---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or 33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre
H? 5-Very ---
Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Damselfly georgiana
Low
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam wner
Owner Type
Johnston County Open Space Johnston County. multiple local
Local Government
government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site NC Department of Transportation
State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on August 17, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-12683: Pierce Road Tract
,ac
.ab� ccen rob Q:` �
4 % O
2 � f
-� E' 1iWtlenJ
327tl
/e e S
E Son.n��
^� t rtl3ay Pa. . n 'h-
sc
Gl = 9:
1•Q°� K i - )Cr N`Yn Ct C h�
Mc Dani,I Rd -
J R Dr - utton D,
r= B
• m E o
4C Ct, v C o
a Ev: Ong Ur z _ io m` o L"6Mna F k^ka �'
- Fooa a'v
w��xp Toe
cF a
-s � � c,ossire D
Rd
v epY
ez ,,00
w Arack PI - i 2
o.Y
p Thar whl'
16
M bo"(n
B,dgel Dr, "
(l2) NC a2 �i
Poaas ��
any 0,,
N �,
ft
WE
Sk` a '
August 17, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Q Managed Area (MAREA)
1:25,033
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Pierce Road
Tract Date: 09/14/2020
/ Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
-Species
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Picoides borealis
staff on August 19, 2020.
Neuse River Waterdog
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Necturus lewisi
Species not present
staff on August 19, 2020.
Carolina Madtom
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Noturus furiosus
species not present
staff on August 19, 2020.
Atlantic Pigtoe
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Fusconaia masoni
species not present
staff on August 19, 2020.
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Suitable habitat present,
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Alasmidonta heterodon
species not present
staff on August 19, 2020.
Yellow Lance
Suitable habitat present,
No effect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Elliptio lanceolata
species not present
staff on August 19, 2020.
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No Eagle Act Permit required
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
bald eagles
staff on August 19, 2020.
Northern Long-eared Bat
Suitable habitat present,
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary survey conducted by S&EC
Myotis septentrionalis
species not present
staff on August 19, 2020.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Specialist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA 09/14/2020
Signature /Title Date

ENT OF Tjr�2
N a
a.
�gpCH 3 A
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 09/1 4/2020
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Pierce Road Tract
Dear Applicant:
U."
FISII &WILDLIFE
SEUV ICE:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
✓ proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑✓ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for I year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at Raleigh(a,fws.gov or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

0
,> R
..
oB
N oA
aB b
I PaD Ra
Q
WaB
' N k 3
LLI
A Pond 1
t cB
w Cep B T
3a �� R ° G?t
cep r `,
Cep'
Q,.
CeB Bb
r { cep
CeC
ee,
r
PaD
PaD Centlt for Geographic Information & Analys s
Project Number: Map Title: N
13941.W1 0 750 1,500
Project Manager: Figure 2- Soil Survey/ I I I I I I I I I
SB Pierce Road Tract Feet
Scale: 1750' Johnston County, NC
" = •
Source: Johnston County Soil � Soil &Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 Fall, ofN— Road, Suite 104, Rnlaigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • F— [phone]
07/10/2019 Survey Sheet 5 .d- om

R `N�
D R`
r"-
/ A B
Op
Pond 2 ����,y
C J
a
R
�+ 42
f Oy
-- f NyC Cunte�r%`Geggraphic Information &Analysis
Project Number: Map Title: N
13941.W1 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 1- USGS Map I I I I I I
SB Pierce Road Tract Feet
Scale: 1 1000' Johnston County, NC
" = •
Source: 2019 NC � Soil &Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: 8412 F..., .I Nan- Rand. Suite 104,.A,i7 h. W 21615 • 11-- 1919) 8465900 • Pas: (919) 846-946
07/10/2019 Edmondson Quad