090103_Inspection_20200805

Division of Water Resources 1;J� ry �i.�
Facility Number 1 - / d 3 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency (?;
Type of Visit: m lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:k5 A 2-cag Arrival Time: 5)I0 A— Departure Time:1 if; l 5 /County: Q Ice£t.4 Region: F,4-/
Farm Name: C'1 049 Hod( Pet--ri4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: M 0 3 v 4- five C.,, O(t`,te, cLi—C.- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (it c µ` - f 5 '?43/1.4.a. /C Title: Phone:
n i
Onsite Representative: (,t Integrator: C'w- S I tef e
t
Certified Operator: SQ,l IJ Certification Number: Q I/C S c(Z
Back-up Operator:r ILO) Vi✓t 5 csl Certification Number: `z- (0 6 8 I1
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:_
f`g (Jj`k� Mc--c.,---- �f 1( 4.c, f_-CS Elk - 1 `C*&
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
•
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean (5(,`f l 5 0`i Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca•aci Po•. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish 11111MEM-- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars I Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MIZEIIMI
Other In Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1--s.1NA ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [c—Nis.—/❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) El Yes ID No [1'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ID NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes 0 El NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 10 El NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - [i93 'Date of Inspection:G , t , 2.1)ZO
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [t-l'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 10 D NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C l] C B -14 .r(7.0
13. Soil Type(s): &, 14 p` Ex Go
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 112K ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 13' .o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? D Yes 10-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes I__I cio ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP 0 Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ID ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 1E4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: cit. /0 3 Date of Inspection: 5 A-b(,'z o 219
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes EeKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ago o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yesio ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1;1410 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [ ‘o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C4,[A) PC+10' 7 M-2 sitar_ Jv 7 - e1_ 1 - 5 (?c, 5 �{b
pa,to s ,x (6ed
C d 11nP
+i VA p0 (A/CI (3
1.5 ik,t,k ITe_ot t(A) p,f6) 6 if-c I)(
c-ril ell ° -30R -49
Reviewer/Inspector Name: E u 4,a f Phone: [phone]y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 6.4 V(9 Zd z-D
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015