090097_Inspection_20200723

Mrs
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - 12i1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: iCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: i2E r Arrival Time: 9 ;V 0 Departure Time:le/Lc-- County: _Zia�vt.. Region:
Farm Name: L�j+�, /yl8-�/�r ' at-"IYV Owner Email:
Owner Name: /71;L'��.-.-- 0,1 f&-t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: L7i-•-_ 111,fr-rt'r Title: (9GC)j.' Phone:
Onsite Representative: S�-u�r Integrator: L ,7"l ' /60/
Certified Operator: � Certification Number: n77
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish f7LC 7DO Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca aci Po s. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
EIMME
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: y` - 9-7 Date of Inspection: 7707_3
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Er<r❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): ! 7
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10- ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): fattZ / cz
13. Soil Type(s): / LA
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Olio ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? es ❑ NoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes [31 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E 1 f(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lalcir ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes [`el] NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes laK0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 7 - 7 Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes EiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑i l o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q'No�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I3 Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1211 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Et No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? E l es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
i --/125 0"1''49ri—‘4 `lam
7-e-X- 7
7 vx :5 al--yorg__ #114(.0e-5 e),d7'.i
19- r;)2..... $(0 fce.f."- e3k
/r.ze...71-E0 ( .5...ff-Tyre 6,--vle 35 4---Poele-04.1 1 "1--.5/715-411,
62/ f/'.n i in;ss; Gt,pc/r 1`�Yete-1)Ca'S agar- TT)
tr._ 6-,.2,1 at,,,,Acer.,_, 0/--51,„ ,j_t----;--.19 /),(e.74------, f 0 70 0,1
/.1-1-1 -1r-i-2/14 d7r7 a
' ''G-0i--e4
rG G{/ ( ce7,4. ,,,,,, k, trr..1--,,,- 3-0 4.1.7} -Tel'-F,-c/ rc-ti Fee-o reli
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 5 6..e ,- Phone: 9fo -D(61
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .1t< "--. Date: Z 75-7—0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015