090056_Inspection_20200805

vision of Water Resources %VIII-5 I/t WG�z ,;�
Facility Number 1 - 5 t 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation l�
0 Other Agency 0
Type of Visit: . tom . nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: $/1.-b6, Arrival Time: p. 10 pi Departure Time:l/f 45 County: 14 4S �cco (Region. 11'y
,___ Owner Email:
Farm Name: —10 �,,t �,9��.� ��v 1`-1
Owner Name: Zp 6l (` 1- t,10.0 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:Facility Contact: CkK,sij S 'cz i(. (2 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: i i Integrator: E'i==-,Sf _
L�
Certified Operator: a . Certification Number: l tIV" E
Back-up Operator: v h yl l2- PO p G� Certification Number: 2i3.5 i g
�.�
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 2,0,0 _9.-I or Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean _ _ Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ Dr Poult Ca 1 aci Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ • -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
1.11
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ©� ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q-14— ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes j-N ❑ NA D NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑'.Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - S'Fj Date of Inspection:e'6A-V6zv20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ do ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA' ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z�
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes 111.146 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ Dio ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 01 ❑ NA El NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes © ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need 0 Yes 1/11:46 El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA 0 NE
0 Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C R -- 5'(T ()13. Soil Type(s): tY0�, lT n 4r' k- Ho
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes thNo ❑ NA 0 NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes la<o El NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA 0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes I6.d"O D NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes algo ❑ NA 0 NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes Ergo ❑ NA 0 NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ef2t<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 -sb Date of Inspection: 5ii-C9 6 2 7:D
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q'&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [Eto ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes `t`o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Q,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes la-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes LZKO ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1=1'1go ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [.INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
grip CO-ct
7, c �� '�''� '" i CO t.v`t't viA-LC- l/
15, to$e ►��c1, ( r, Yvu 1vt, (, , 14 '
(C. I 5 ot-, 1 fvbv- 40 sitc 0,10e4-162,i 3e-R-141 p v -. ,1--.C----tg------.
f,YC0-`144-- 441
c a 11t7 -3o6— 66s' r
Reviewer/Inspector Name: - • Q l [1 0 U n l a p Phone: C(0`93 3.33 3 tf
�G Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,74# Date: 8140 6 o zo
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015