090049_Inspection_20200715

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 7 - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: empliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:( 7—/5 jArrival Time:1 9-;/S Departure Time: /9;_30 County: aehPti- Region: D
Farm Name: 5-L 1),,U (3/env, v. I.(J j,�rr F„r-, Owner Email:
Owner Name: w'r b�-.r f /ryl5 27:::nG. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: j.,ti71�r/2 D (�Cc z qF u 7-7 Title: �/� /yj `lJ •r Phone:
Onsite Representative: S ci Integrator:
Certified Operator: 5c--ec Certification Number: /2,s3')7,5
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _ Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder /7 D U Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish "ODD 30'e) Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Z Z00 7X)c_..) Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca aci Po . _Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIESE -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars II Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
EMMEN
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: c" - q g' 'Date of Inspection: 7/f�a
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structu_r/e�2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: /����� dj Ut-4rr_
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): /7 /9
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ElZ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir mental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El' o El NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 121110 El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? /
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes ❑'1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Windowin ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): / J`/r��/27, / ✓ ..
13. Soil Type(s): / Coe-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes or No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E2T No D NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes N El NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes El
El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes IZ(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes El<lo El NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: - y`f' Date of Inspection: 7 /j= p
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [.]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [/]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
zion-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: M-Jj v-
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA 0 NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 121/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes U 1V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
F 5 Yf y3adr ArYaS
Reviewer/Inspector Name: J/;G`e_ u� Phone: ��-303—NC
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: '!tr Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015