090048_Inspection_20200707

Division of Water Resources T 5' IStriti Z00 AO
Facility Number 9 - 9 g 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 6
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: -compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (IA-Putine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 •241 )Arrival Time:I cfl 00 /T-- Departure Time:I County: ')(t'e\ Region: '4 y
Farm Name: L.I s 60,t Sok) Fa'm .t / Owner Email:
Owner Name: L .'s-6,1 ( Gtdv-t S Z 4( Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4 3 L r&4-b'l Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: A - L‘o"i Integrator: K4 6— c
Certified Operator: 6- - . L040, Certification Number: ( U C z.S
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow _
Wean to Feeder 4(O 6 Ei Non-Layer Dairy Calf
7 1Feeder to Finish 1 6 v> al Dairy Heifer -
Farrow to Wean ,'S:,v 31 141 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca I aci Pot. Non-Dairy
_ _
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars II Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other II Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes likki ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Et- IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No L_I ':f' El NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes l o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: c( - tA Date of Inspection: 73W1 2D ID
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 111,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No QIcA— ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 21
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 17;10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,--,�
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes 0. 1V O ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
O PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C-sg 4! z t( SG-') ,/J /'
13. Soil Type(s): LY(9y14 a�1 &,, *t /fah (9 Novi•PO l �/
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes ©?1�6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ J2 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes To El NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El
�To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP 0 Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 11/4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections r. 0 Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes U 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 'j - 443 (Date of Inspection: 1 sir ao
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 111,1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [l' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes U 1 to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 121<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ]I: No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 'EN() ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ico ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ctit%(9I�� �, '/1-19
S u`1\'`11 . 0c - 1-- lc/ 32'7E,
\(,-.4.14P f,(4-'24;
ae S
6)1,1
C' Al cclo -30(6 -6 8.S(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1v 1 V At (✓ Phone: qlt 43 3✓3 3 5
jar 7.0 7-0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015