090045_Inspection_20200929

/O- 1 7- ?
ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:ve7,'/z- ( County: .•-` Region:
Farm Name: BA- /5,721�1- G lam' �i rYl. Owner Email:
Owner Name: 3 1„.2_ / a%- z L GC; Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Zrrer71_ /n-edu'I _ Title: ,��`� Phone:
Onsite Representative: 5 r Integrator: 5/1/V/7:
—fo
Certified Operator: Certification Number: //ic)z/3 Lz
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Z_j‘. ; (pi/To Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poul Ca aci Po . Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish • -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes LJ 1V o n NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No n NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No n N A ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9frtorrDate of Inspection: �419- 'J
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): !? /9-
Observed Freeboard(in): .3 9- 3 if
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA n N• E
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes I -lio n NA n N• E
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ©'No ❑ NA n NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Et-No n NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [e]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 21No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Zermatt" fo 25eYJf /60.-ks i I.uhr
13.Soil Type(s): 14 /rn, /47 /z D
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes lJ< n NA n NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? tares ❑ No ❑ NA n N• E
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Yes L_f'c'o n N• A ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n Yes Er‹. El NA n N• E
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ©'IQo n N• A n NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes I No n NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ®No n NA n NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps n Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes 1=1‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ErNo n N• A n N• E
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA n NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 1.4"-- I Date of Inspection: y ti
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Qj o n NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Et<es n No ❑ NA n NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
n Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑won-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 17n...,/,
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 12-1CTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes t 1Fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes I -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dIs-ilo n NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes Ql(o 0 NA n NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [r]"No ❑ NA n NE
34:Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA n NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
��v/�i61 2t4..5 Pam;If 7 p(OA- Y e 1 p WW.'3 ,yS�J,J rrJ , /LAY
04- 1t.3 -"r-r j w ; II bz-� ;tit;/ -mil 10 r-)C1-u1 `r-1
1:=9 -iT7C)/ D 7`T �✓r��z5 i r rrrn Je / l/r�s
tor,A: Arort- "
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: ZID J ew57
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: < '� `� Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015