090041_Inspection_20200828

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number FT'I - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: a ifoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
4
0
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:I ? 'y41 Departure Time:�/.�ZV County: ,254.4.-1.- Region: r‘ .
Farm Name: / I d Z—e .. "" Owner Email:
Owner Name: 7Q/)C a,,-7 - 'j _Z 7L. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ` yL 3,, r/' Title: 7(,c9/7 y f Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,Saz_e_. Integrator: < �7/�t7`-7 .41(i'
Certified Operator: ,547-4.42. Certification Number: /'/ //y
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
to Feeder ?pet ' Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ D Pouf Ca t aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ M . —_ Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers —_ Beef Feeder _
Boars El Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
11111
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: ? L// I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes lIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): fit.
Observed Freeboard(in): a2
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [i]No El NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [j No ❑ NA El NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require El Yes Er< El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window /❑' Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
/
12.Crop Type(s): (y ., GUY /� /X � Dr/
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Effes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [l'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes Er<r ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [/]rZIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er< El NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall El Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑No El NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9 - g,� (Date of Inspection: �-�g��A1P"
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IZ[11-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check El Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes e/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [r/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [/]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilityc to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). /�
z" rl d( ( ? i S til 494- TT , 4al� T 3 T)e..o
t`-s Pin/J . Aimed br gip u'` Y°1/Jo,--€ ,1,t err"
o
S, / i prlol JGIs TO 5�fY� d-') 6v-. ,z
eut fl4if- ' - a /�1�
yet To CZ ��z-r-d
iJO'1 e (. .5tlicb (Al i fl b - "-Hai/ il Jam' DOrL/ !� "%r*ri C---Id, c 47
/00,.rs1.1rz- yo0 t, havT a_ tt/as)-r 1�" L - f/`7 SLu �,i1c.ex, e
/57"--7124L er/ of- ry.e g7-c , n yD v 1-- „FDD 1` ..
4/3 0 ,S,r7 Otr- --1-117-2- 6-raf3 1//1_ -5-2--1%-ktvvi en- r-I 214.
/fin 4)7'L L`o/07,,,ia Gz-c / ) i `ta0,-;� ?a;- ✓ru Li ep r
note' c wf// ei-,-,.-47/r ,f-//7: -rs. A/w :7 w 7 7/J�<< .a---
Reviewer/Inspector Name: c-: �jz_ Phone: 9i i 5P. ''o(57
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i' Date: �w-,94�
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015