090041_Inspection_20191230

/NJ u 1: --r c —` i j'} —[i ( �L )'-3 0 J c .'+l 1;,-..A— _i/��`/f-f
ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number �� I - l�/ 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 C mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: `�3Q-/9 Arrival Time: /0'V2 Departure Time: /�?;DO County: Region: D
Farm Name: 'O//C -ralT/?e✓s -Lift. Owner Email:
Owner Name: ) "A r&t7 'r-✓3 �`r a Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'f pm-- 7 r/" Title: BGe./ tom Phone:
Onsite Representative: `‹wLv j/Integrator: /of
Certified Operator: .5��,e_ Certification Number: /5}/9
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 7/fir/ $3'4 ) Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish _ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ Dr Poult Ca•aci Po I. Non-Dairy
_
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts _ •Non-La ers -- _ _Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IIIMMINE
Other •Turke Poults
Other El Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N�o ❑ NA El NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes lag-CC- ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g - // Date of Inspection: /9-30 a''6'?
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Er<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): //
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? D Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes la o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes la1\Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12K ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): rrule� (�Ia2-t� Fr-4�_'a?- / / +' ter 61./rryr A
13. Soil Type(s): C /77
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? E'�es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 13<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes I 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 1io ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. DoesDo record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
ste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard la<te Analysis lagel Analysis ❑Waste Transfers Iather Code
0 Rainfall ❑Stocking []Gop Yield 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 12-1c16 ❑ NA 0 NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 1 - 4/ 'Date of Inspection: /,13a-�/1---
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Ergo o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes lag; ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes lago ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Er-go ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ca-<) ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes L_I<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings-of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
/J . Ct7+�J O I ii.141 I -FYS CAir re1.5 ;/•r
X,CDt Pre1 l . "-,3iN ri, t v r.vi,4,D/ '-....7 v�1 ; IZ,rt CA"'/ � t=3l d' "`Z 1 j
rpu ee d i n!.-J D/ d-- / 8v-p/s -J i7'y'
g fatfl Aca k/astrfrhaK o re-b. glam? clC wr'Qtz))gs
NO 12,621:), Loast Arn gis •r•o -• /Yf 0-. FpT3x4 2.-F i'z
No sti l 47145> 1 n yocS'- r- o p,S < 7: 4 ✓teai).S /r--i
/cesr-p eapp
i<,- tved y a,' d- Po/77�,1.t "r yec '-:.3 `J
irn ?lI ,�Jpcv, 7� f(�-1 _I KK ( C'r,ot15 BA Y �,,r^---
34+ a,�GuvS l`e-01Bv�ol i r� go/ 7 is S 7;/( ems-.,r/Ti farms 7113 l�1 rrs b�
4-r/t eZ5 `T /ram i✓Yi i el- -3i
v 5)
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 3vT-cam C4�„r,,,7sz..� Phone: 5/U;j� S/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7tig Date: ,' j P--�/?1"
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015