20070612 Ver 1_Application_20070409

• 0 7 0 6 1 2
~ North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton_ Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Cyndii Karoly, NCDWQ
FROM: Mark Fowlkes, NCWRC
DATE: April 3, 2007
~~ ~~G~~
SUBJECT: Permit application for: Sunshine Freedom Association Project, Stream and
Wetland Enhancement Plan, Christian Creek, Surry County, North Carolina.
I am pleased to submit the attached plan for 4501inear feet of stream enhancement (Nationwide
Permit Number 27) on Christian Creek, Surry County for your review. The plan includes
wetland enhancements that will take place outside of the wetland and therefore should not need
permitting. Also enclosed are the agent authorization letter, Intra-Service Section 7 Biological
Evaluation form, cultural resource compliance information, and a copy of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Services Wildlife Cooperative Extension Agreement (number 144-40181-02-G-208)
with the landowner. Based on North Carolina's Division of Water Quality -Wetlands/401
Certification Unit (NCDWQ) conditions for certification stream enhancement, we have enclosed
three copies of the above referenced plan and 401 permit application for your information and
files. It is our understanding that if no notification is received from NCDWQ within 30 days of
receipt of this application and plan, the project may proceed provided that the project complies
with all other conditions of the General Certification.
Please forward any comments or concerns to me at P. O. Box 387, Elkin, NC 28676 or by email
to markfowlkes cr,earthlink.net. Thank you for reviewing this plan in a timely manner.
Q~~~o~~~
APR 9 2007
pEid~ - WA16R QUAU i Y
'NETLA~iD3 AND STORA~AA'ATER BRANCH
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Office Use Only: Form Version Mazch OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. X 7 0 6 1 2
(1t any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing ~ ~' ~ ~T E `~~
~~
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
II.
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 27
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check D r~ ~ ~~ n
U D
Applicant Information 2007

APR 9
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Sunshine Freedom Association Inc uENlt -WATER QUALITY
Mailing Address: 255 Big Hickory Lane w€nnNOSayo sr(1RL444ATER 6RANGH
Dobson NC 27017
k.e ,1~=n rc~~ I ~:± c~
Telephone Number: 336-366-2963 Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. AgentlConsultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mark Fowlkes
Company Affiliation: NC. Wildlife Resources Commission
Mailing Address: PO Box 387
Elkin. NC 28621
Telephone Number: 336-527-1547 Fax Number: 336-527-1548
E-mail Address:_ markfowlkes(a,earthlink.net
Page 5 of 13

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Sunshine Freedom Association Project: Stream and Wetland
Enhancement Plan, Christian Creek, Surry County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 4948-00-98-8551
4. Location
County: Surry Nearest Town: Dobson
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Highway 21 north of
Elkin, right on Mountain Park Road
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum.): 36.4498 °N 80.8713 °W
6. Property size (acres): 154.97
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Christian Creek is a tributary to the North
Fork of the Mitchell River
8. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.usladmin/ma~s/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The stream enhancement site is located along the edge
Page 6 of 13

of a pasture and through a power line right-of--way. There are 4501inear feet of stream
with eroding stream banks, log iam and center bar. The 0.7 acre existing forested
wetland seep on the property has been ditched and ahead-cut is draining the wetland.
All enhancement activities (excluding removal of vegetation by hand) will occur outside
of the wetland and will not impact the wetland. SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR
DETAILS.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project will stabilize a total of 450 if of stream. No change in pattern is planned.
Methods include bank re-shaping to reestablish proper channel dimension and profile,
install rock weir, log vanes, and root-wads where appropriate, re-vegetate banks and
plant riparian zone with native trees and shrubs. The project will enhance the
hydrology of the wetland. Low berm /ditch-plug will be installed in the uplands and the
head-cut will be filled to the existing soil grade to stop further degradation of the
wetland. Surface water of the existing wetland will not be increased. Earth moving
work will be conducted using a trackhoe. SEE ATTACHED PLAN FOR DETAILS.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The bank stabilization and natural stream
enhancement work needs to be conducted within this section of Christian Creek to
prevent continued stream bank erosion, down-cutting of the stream channel, loss of
land for agriculture, and loss of valuable aquatic habitat. Habitat will be restored for
numerous federal trust resources and habitats for the federally threatened by similarity
of appearance Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenber~ii (Status: State threatened), neotropical
migratory birds, native freshwater mussels, and brown trout Salmo trutta. SEE
ATTACHED PLAN FOR DETAILS.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No _previous permits were requested
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated
Page 7 of 13

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: SEE ATTACHED PLAN -
Stabilize stream banks and enhance 450 linear feet of Christian Creek, temporary off-
site sedimentation during construction will be kept to a minimum, disturbed areas will
be stabilized at the end of each day.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
Wetland seep Fig 1 none Forested bog No 100 If 0

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/stralghtening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multi ly len h X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before act (linear feet) (acres)
Figure 1 in plan Christian Creek Enhancement Perennial 20 ft 450 0.21
Page 8 of 13

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) I 450 I 0.21
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dyed 'n , floodin , draina e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): p,21
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.21
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 450
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation - N/A
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface azea:
Page 9 of 13

VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Bank stabilization will reduce in-stream sediment impacts, improve aquatic and terrestrial
habitats and restore trout stream buffer zones along 4501E of eroding streambanks. A
trackhoe will be used to reshape eroding banks and install rock weirs, log vanes and root
wads. Re-shaped banks will be seeded with a temporary annual crop and permanent
native herbaceous miz. All disturbed areas will be stabilized using 700 weight coir matting
and mulch by the end of each day. Native trees and shrubs will be planted in the dormant
season. Construction access corridor and stockpiled materials will be surrounded by silt
fencing as needed. We will only disturb area that can be stabilized by the end of the day.
SEE ATTACH PLAN FOR DETAILS.
VIII. Mitigation -NOT REQUIRED
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating; restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide. html.
Page 10 of 13

1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.uslwrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
Page 11 of 13

and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
2.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buff ul ' I' E ' ff eam.
er m h iers. ~st><n bu ers wil l be im roved alon the trout str
ZOne* (s care feet) Multiplier Mitqu t Uii
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
N/A
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Page 12 of 13

Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Work will begin in May which after the end trout spawning. Disturbance of soils will be
limited to only what work can be accomplished and stabilized on a daily basis.
~- y -~~~
A~icant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
0
Page 13 of 13

o ~ ~ ~ s l 2
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Richard B. Hamilton, Executive Director
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
This agreement made and entered into by and between the NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE
RESOURCES COMMISSION ("Commission") and the SUNSHINE FREEDOM
ASSOCIATION ("Owner"). The Owner hereby grants the Commission permission to act as the
Owners' agent to obtain all needed permits from all units of government including, but not
limited to, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the State of North Carolina to
accomplish a streambank stabilization project on the Owner's property.
The Commission agrees to obtain and pay any permit processing fees required for the
Commission's and Sunshine Freedom Association's Contract for Watershed Enhancement
Services to stabilize eroding streambanks along the Christian Creek in Surry County, North
Carolina.
Signed: ~~~'_~~~~
{Property Owner's Signature or designate)
255 Bid Hickory Lane
(Address)
Dobson, NC 27017
(Town, state, zip code)
336-366-2963
(Phone number)
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Representative
By/ti
Date: ~ ~ ~ '"~ /
Mark Fowlkes /Stream Restoration Coordinator /March 14 2007
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

January, 1999 In~ttKUCttont !ac antra-Service Section 7 Forox - ~eglon 4
REGION 4
INTRA-SERVICE SECTION 7 BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION FORM
Originating Person: Laura M. Fogo
Telephone Number: _91.0-695-3323 ext. 4_ E-Mail: [e-mail]
Date; ~Marcbt 23, 2007
PROJECT NAME (Grant Title/Number): Su~asltine Freedom Association
Service Program: Self explanatory
Ecological Services
_ Federal Aid
_ Clean Vessel Act
Coastal Wetlamds
_~ Endangered Species Section 6
_X Partners for FYs6 and Wildlife
_ Sport Fish Restoration
_ wildlife Restoration
Fisheries
Refuges/Wildlife
II. StatelAgency: NC-USFWS
III. Station Name: Raleigh Field Office
IV. Description of Proposed ,fiction (attach additions! pages as needed):
What is the purpose of this proposed action and how do you plan m accomplish it?
Through a USFW$ Wildlife Cooperative Extension Agreement and NCWRC agreement,
Sunshine Freedom Association voluntarily wants to restore approximately 3301inear feet
of stream on Christian Creek, and enhance and restore an approximate .70 acre rrxountai><x
bog on their property located north of Dobson, in Surry County, NC. Natural channel
design will be i~acozporated utilizing z>,atural features. 'three level one assessments have
been conducted to determine design to return this section of impacted stream to its
approximate dimension, pattern and profile reflected in the stream enhancer>raezrt plan by
the NCWItC. Ban~lcs will be re-sloped azrd planted witb ap aruxual nurse crop and NC
ecotypes of native trees, shrubs, grasses, and fortis. The floodplain will also been planted
iz~ attempt to restore the riparian buffer to protect the stream, provide shade, protect water
quality wkrile ezrhancizag it for wildlife.
The mountain bog has had previous impacts from agriculture. One man-made ditch is
currently drairaixag the wetlands and ahead-cut has formed. Two ditch plugs have been
designed to plug these two problem azeas located in uplands. Lazge woody debzi,s will
also be incorporated where needed to step down the elevation to the intermittent stream in

03/25/2007 18:14
Ja~nary,1999
9106953322
USFWS NC SANDHILLS
Instractlaas for Iota-Service Sectloa 7 Form - neaten 4
PAGE 02
uploads. Some large trees and slalall trees wi11 be hand cut by brush saw and chain saw at
the base. This will allow stuiligXit to reach the bog to erthance it far potential bog turtles
as well as help 1'estore the hydrology. The existing wetland will be restored clad
enhanced. Notification will be sent to file regulatory and state agencies raider Nationwide
Permit 27.
w. pertlueant Specie` and Habitat:
A. Include specles/Labitat occurrence map: Attach a snap that identities species locations
with the project ans.
B. Com lete the follow' table:
SP1EClES/CRITICAL $ABIT,AT STATUS'
STATUS: E~endangered, T-threatened, PE--proposod ondangercd, PT~tropoaed threatened, Cli~crirical habitat,
r~tt-propoaecl critical habitat, C~csrtdidate species
Identify listed, proposed and candidate species as well as designated and proposed critical habitat within the
action area and their status. The action area includes the immediate area where the proposed actioa will
occur, as well as a,ay other areas where director indirect itnpaets of the action may be expected. Fo:
example, elects of an action in the headwaters of a steam Wray affect endangered fish that occur 20 miles
downstream. A compilation of species or critical habitats that possibly occur is the action area may be
generated by the Project Leader, or it may be requested from the appropriate Ecological Services t~frree.
Note: All experimental populations of listed species are treated ae threatened species. ~lowever, fox the
proposes of intro-Service section 7 consultation, they are treated as species proposed for listing if they
occur ol'Natiotta] Wildlife IteTuge vx National Park System lands and they are classed as "non-essential"
experimental populations.
.List all listed, proposed or candidate species and designated or proposed critical habitat that may occuu
within the action area. This informs the reviewer what species have been considered.
VI. Location (attach map):
A. Ecoregion Number and Name: SSPD
B. County and State: Sorry County, NC
C. Section, township, and ranEe (or latitude and longitude):
Bryan Township
LatlLong: 3tS deg 26' S9" N
$0 deg 52' 17"W
A. Distance (miles) and direction to nearest town: Located appzo~ciraately 10 Wailes
North of Dobson, NC. See attached maps.
2

03/25/2007 18:14 9106953322 USFWS NC SANDHILLS PAGE 03
J.nu^ry, 1999 ~aitractloae for Intra-Service Secdoa 7 dorm - ReLion 4
E. Species/habitat occurrence: No federally listed species have been found on Sunshine
Freedom Association property. Plant surveys were conducted by K.e~a Bridle, Consultanting
botanist, while conducting the Sorry County Natural Heritage Inventory in the 90's. Laura l; ogo,
project leader of PFW project has also inventoried the project area for rare plants. Christian
Creels, headwaters of the North Fork Mitchell River Mows through the property. Na federally
listed freshwater mussels or fish or invertebrates were found in Christian Creek. There is a small
wetland seep or mountain bog we are planning to restore the hydrology to enhance habitat for the
bog turtle (Glyptemys muhCenbergii), Threatened S/A Previous surveys have been. conducted by
Dr. A~ Sommers, Biology professor, UNCG, and none were found. Another survey will be
conducted on Apri13, 2007. Bog turtles were known to occur approximately 2 zz~iles down
stream at the Rocky Ford Hog in 1999. 'rapping efforts were conducted at Rocky Ford Bog
under Ih. Somers permit in 2005 anal gone were found unfortunately. ~ the 2006 annual status
suzvey, Herman quotes, "The bog turtle is state listed as "threatened" in North Carolina and
federally Listed as "threatened due to similarity of appearance" under the U.S. Erxdaugered
Species Act. This federal protection. will supposedly strengthen the protection of the bog turtle
£rom over collecting range wide, but will not protect bog turtle habitat iua the southern range."
This voluntary effort is in attempt to restore and protect bog turtle habitat with the Services'
Partners for Fish and Wildlife lPrograu}..
The bog turtle's range according to the river basins in North Carolina (STATUS AND
DISTRIBUTION OF THE BOG TURTLE, G/ypfemys muhlenbengii, 1N NORTH
CAROLINA, 2006 by Dennis W. Herman, and N.C. Department of Transportation
PDEA, NEU Biological Survey Group).
VII. Determination of Effects:
,A,. Eacplanation oi' eD'ects of the action on specter and critical habitats in item V.
B (attach additional pages as needed):

03/25/2007 18:14
Lnuary, 1999
9106953322
U5FW5 NC SANDHILLS
fnatavctlons for infra-Servlet Setdon 7 Form - Revlon 4
PAGE 04
Disease either the effects of the action on each listed, proposed, or candidate species and critical habitat in
the action area, or why thou species or critical habitat$ will not be affected. Poe species or critical habitats
affected by the proposed action, provide the fallowing information:
Impacts of the proposed action on species and/or critical habitat, including direct, iadirect, interdependent,
interrelated, sad etlmtilative impacts. (Quantification of effects -acres of habitat, miles of habitat, number
of individuals, etc.
SPECIESI I IlVIPAC'TS TO SPECS/CRITICAL HABITAT
CRITICAL HABITAT
N/A, NONE
B. Explanation of actions to be implemepted to reduce adverse effects:
Project modification ideas nlay be found is recovery plans. Although section 7 of Act pzohtbits only those
actioos by Federal agencies which are likely to jeopardize listed species or adversely modify critical habitat,
the Service has a commitment Uo recovering listed species and tryiag to prevent the need to list additional
SPECIES/ I ACTIONS TO MITIGATT/MIlVA'II7.E IMPACTS
CRITICAL HABITAT
N/A, NONE
VfIX. Effect Xfetermination and Response Requested:
SPECIES/ AETERMINATIONt RESiPONSEt
CRITICAL HABITAT REQUESTED
Bog turtle (not federally listed as E,
T,orC. X
Brook Floater, FSC, not C
U6I hKM1NA'17UN/ KlstiPONSt: R,SQI1FSTl3D: '
NE = no effect. Thin determination is appropriate when dre proposed action will not directly, indirectly, or cumulatively impact, tither
positively or ntgadvcly, qtly listed, pratoaod, candidate species ar deaignahrd/propaaod critical habitat, Response Requested is optional
but a Concutrence@ is rccotntrtafded for a armplete Adrniniatrative Record.
NA -not liltely ro adversely atTect 1]-ia determination is appropriate when the proposed action is not likeay to advetsely impact any
listed, proposed, candidate species at deaignatnd/propeacd critical habitat w there may be lxneflcial effects ro these resources.
Response Requested is a@Concurrcnce@,
AA =likely tp adversely a11'oct '~'l}ia daterminat+on ip appropriate when the proposed action is lilorly to adversely impact sty listed,
proposed, candidate species or de~ippatedlproposed atdcal habitat. Reaponte Requested far listed species is APomwl Consuhation@.
Response requested for proposed and andidate species is )tGonfttrortce@.
Eater the Species, the I}eterminatlon, and the Response Requested.
No eRect/no adverse modlAeatton. For listed, proposed, or candidate species. Ibis conclusion is reached
if the proposed action, and its intezrelated aztd interdependent actions will not directly or indirectly affect

03/25/2007 18:14
January, 1999
9106953322
USFWS NC SANDHILLS
Instractlons for Iatra~ervlce Sectlon 7 Form - Rerion 4
PAGE 05
listed species or destroy/adversely modify designated critical habitat. Respoase Requested action would be
the optional writtem CO4currenCe is encouraged to facilitate t complete adnronistrative record.
Mav Affect. but Is not likely to adverse v affect sDeciea/adveraely modify ~rltlcal habitat. This
conclusion is appropriate when effects to the species or critical habitat are expected to be beneficial,
discountable, or insignificant. Beneficial effects are contemporancouspesitive effects without any adverse
effects to the species or habitat. Insignificant affects relate to the size ot'the impact (and should sever reach,
the scale wheze take occurs), while discountable effects are those that are extrmmly unlikely to occur.
Based on best judgment, a person would not: (1) be able to mesnit~gfillly measure, detect, or evaluate
insignificant effects; oz (2) expect discountable effects to occur. Tf the Ecological Services Office concurs
in writing with the Project Leader's determination of "is not lrtely to adversely affect" listed species or
critical habitat, the infra-Service section 7 consultation proe~as is eompkted.
1V,Tav atYect and is Ukety to adversely affect anecieBLsd~~v modify crttteal habitat. This conclusion
is reached if any adverse effect to listed species oz critical habitat may occur as a direct oz iniduect result of
the proposed Service action oz its inteaelated or interdependent actions, sad the e;~'ect is not discountable
oz iosigaificam (see defuution of "is not likely to adversely affect". Im the event tht overall effect of the
proposed action is beneficial to the listed species or critical habitat, but may also cause same adverse effect
oz- individuals o!'the listed species or segments of the critical habitat, them the determination should be "is
likely to adversely affect." Such a determination requires formal section 7 consultation.
Ts Lks v o eoDardt3e Dronosed soeciel/adversely modtfv DroDOSed-~rl is shiest. For proposed
species and proposed critical habitats, the Service is required to evaluate whether the proposed Service
action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the proposed species or adversely modify an arcs
proposed for designation as critical habitat. If this eonelusioa is reached, a section 7 conference is required.
If this eoaclusion ie reached, infra-Service conference is required.
is 1lkety to ieon~rdize candidate specie:. For candidate species, die Service is required to evaluate
whether the proposed Service action is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the candidate species.
if this conclusion is reached, i~a-Service section 7 conference is required.
3 3 ~7
Signature (originati station) date
~'isb. alud Wildlife Biologist
Title
fX. Reviewing Ecological Services office Evaluation:
A. Concurrence _X Nonconcurrence
B. Formal consultation required
C. Conference required
D. Informal conference required
E. Rezna~rks (attach additional pages as needed):
~~
ignatare dat

Title oiYiee

REQt?EST FOR CULTURAL "ESOURCE
COMFLIANCh
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 4
For Archaeoloeist's Use.
Date reed:
Initial Review:
Fieldwork
Report:
SHPO Letter:
SHPO Concurrence reed:
Compliance Completed:
Project Name: Sunshine Freedom Stream and Wetland Restoration Program: Partners for Fish and Wildlife
(Retuga,ES,FA,
Hatchery, ttc.)
State: NC FWS Unit: Pee Dee NWR
Project County Township Range Section FWS Contact: Laura Fogo
Location:

Surry Bryan Name: Laura Fogo
Telephone #.[phone]
• Address: Pee Dee NWR Rt. ]Box 92
Wadesboro, NC 28170
Email: lau [e-mail]
USGS Quad: Bottom Date of Request: 5/13/02
Estimated total .34 acre stream and upland riparian buffer Proposed Project
project (acres or restoration (350 linear feet); .23 acre Start Date: September, 2002
linear fUm) wetland enhancement and restoration.
Total .57 acre
MAPS Attached "X" box below
2 copies of portion of USGS Quad with X X Project (sketch) map showing Area of Potential Effect with
project area clearly marked (required) locations of specific ground altering activities (required)
Section of SCS/NRCS soil map with project X Any other project plans, photographs, or drawings that may help
area clearly marked (optional) Staff Arch..in making determination (if available)
Photocopy of aerial photo showing location X
(if available)
Description of Describe the proposed project and means to facilitate (e.g., provide funds to Revegetate 1 mile of riparian habitat, restore 250 acres of
Undertaking: seasonal wetlands, and construct a 5-acre permanent pond, erect pole shed, construct visitor center with associated infrastructure). How is
the project designed (e.g, install ditch plugs and create 25 acres of seasonal wetland)? Do you propose to demolish or to renovate a
structure? What kind of structure? Is the structure 50 years or older?
Stabilize approx.'350 linear feet of streambank and revegetate riparian buffer. Estimate: Instream 350 x 12 feet wide=.096 acre; 350 x 30
feet revegetating on stream bank= .24 acre. (Total estimate= .34 acre) We are using natural channel design (Rosgen) techniques
The area
.
was previously cleared by farming practices and power company right-of way. No structures are involved and no'land clearing activities.
A wetland seep (.23 AC) will be enhanced for bog turtle habitat by hand clearing some trees with a chain saw. A small section (10 x 10) of
.ditch spoil pile is planned to,be excavated and placed back into the'ditch creating a "ditch plug" to restore hydrologic functions.
Area of Describe where disturbance of the ground will occur (as they apply to your project). What aze the dimensions of the area to be disturbed?
Potential How deep will you excavate? What method are you using to plant vegetation? What methods are you using to eradicate exotic vegetation?
Effects (APE): Where will fill be obtained? Where will be soil be dumped? What tools or equipment will be used? Are you replacing or repairing a
structure? Differentiate between areas slated for earth movement vs. areas to be inundated only. Is the area to be inundated different from
the area inundated today, in the recent past, or under natural condition?
Ground disturbance will be conducted within the streambank (350 feet) and portions within the stream channel. This can be conducted
using a trackhoe excavator with hydraulic thumb. Approximately 5 rootwads are to be placed in the streambank for stabilization. The
rootwads will come from the trees that have fallen in the channel. Basically the overhanging, eroding streambank will be pulled back to a
more gradual slope and planted with hardwood vegetation. Estimated depth of bank restoration is approximately Z-3 feet. Bare root stock
trees and live stakes will be planted between 0-10 inches in the ground. All equipment and access will be confined to the project area in the
faint field adjacent to the stream. The "ditch plug" to restore hydrologic functions in the wetland is proposed to be conducted with a small
rubber-tire back hoe. An existing 4-wheeler trail will allow access. Excavation will be to pre-elevation contours and ditch will be filled to
pre-elevation contours (approx. 5 x 10 foot plug).
iy
M'
'~ ^i!!.

Environmental Briefly describe the environ-~ental setting of the APE. A) What was the natural habita+ -nor to modifications, reclamation, agriculture,
and Cultural settlement? B) What is tt d-use history? How deep has it been cultivated, grazed; iered, etc.? C) What is land use and habitat
Setti^g: today? D) Do you (or does anybody else) know of cultural resources in or near the project area?
A) The natural habitat prior to agriculture and power line R-O-W was up]and riparian hardwood buffer (floodplain) and perennial stream.
[n the .23 acre wetland seep, the area was wooded, wetter and not ditched. Evidence of prior conversion, hummocks, ditching, and spoil
piles line both sides of the abandoned field. Water continues to seep from the hill. B) Agriculture and power right-of--way within the
project area (see aerial); farming/garden/pasture for cows; Cultivation est. 8-12 inches The wetlands were farmed within the last 35 years.
C) Land use today is abandoned pasture-fescue that is mowed. This .23 acre wetland is now revegetated. Portions of the opposite side of
the stream is undisturbed and wooded. The owners want to restore the stream and riparian buffer and leave approximately 30-50 foot
vegetated buffers. There will be no disturbance where the streambank is intact. D) No. 1 called the local NRCS office and asked and they
were not aware of any cultural resources in or near the project area. I am not aware of any near the project area.
Return form, maps, and photos to: Brant Loftin -Staff Archaeologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1875 Century Blvd, STE 200 Atlanta, GA 30345
Questions: 404-679-7110, fax [phone], or Brant [e-mail]

TopoZone -The Web's Topographic Map Page 1 of 2
0 ~,
~.~~~ ~ _~
Target is 36° 26' S9"N, 80° 52' 17"W -BOTTOM quad Quad. Info.J
':topozone.com ~~'' ~~~j~~`~~~~ ~ ~--~ Sw~sh~n~ ~r~,tC- S~.~y_~, .•-I~,ve~
Copyri~h~ 2~ Ala~p~lacartie,inc~4 ~~ .~ ~ /iL ~ ~ l.~"'"` "" "' _ '1r~~t~T'~~1"" cr_ •'f`
~ ~~,,^.
~~ t ~ 1 T ~ " _ - " "~ I ~-A K .,.-fi'b'
~~ a Y~ i i\"" 1~D ,1 t...«."'a ~ 1 ~ ~ ~`",/ ~ 1 I`f ~ y / ~ ~c,' ~ ~ 7 ! ~..3! u..,
t v ~ ~ ~ ~~".,~.J ~ "';~ ~,rv~' ~~ X11 i ~ ~ ! "
~ ~ `M/ • 1~ Q
~''~ `tea/f -'ti. ~ ~ ~i`',`~. ~y ~ ^, ~" ~ l v L•' ' ~! 4 ~ ,;fi~~ t`~'a ~' ~ ~ ~{'
\~' L jj ~ iii `~ ,r~-~ ~~ ~ f~ ~ { ~~ ~ '1 1 N• ~~~~) ' r.~"- f/ \ /~,,~ ; ,~''
a~ r" ~ ~ k ~ `~ ~~~~ y~~~~ i-'..~f ~ ;J . l: ~-'-x*:s'~~,/^r3 f~~4 ~~'
a {rte ~ ~~ ~ /f~ *w.. i ~~,v~ °..7;;~/~7 ~~~~~ ~ ~~y,-~ ~ ~ s~.
_.~ ~ ~~
mac} j ~_" i `"."""`- "~. t ;` ~ "i) ~ `-~ ~~{ +-.. ~' ~!/'
~ e ~y ~ i !: {;fl
_~~-y'~~ ~' .. l'~~~ _A :. ~i„~;_~=` ~~ -.~,ti,.~~~ ~ t~i~j 3{~ ~=t ~ 1 i~j j ,f
~ \ 11
k:'r. , ~. ~,~~
0 500 1000 1b00 2000
meters i { , {
miles ~ his 1;0
http://topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=4033637&e=511536&s=25&u=2 5/15/2002

Brant Loflin To: Laura Fogo/R4/FWS/DOI@FWS
06/11/2002 03:13 PM cc:
Subject: Sunshine Freedom Project
As we discussed on 6/4/01, this project has a small prehistoric site adjacent to it. This project should have
little potential to adversely effect the site as the project is currently planned; however, if the project plan
changes notify the Staff Archaeologist to let them know that the project may have adverse effects to the
site based on the changes. f will write the NC SHPO #o inform them of the site and our plan to avoid
disturbing it. Just to reiterate our discussions with Dick, it is OK to drive equipment in the area since the
site is protected with a colluvial deposit capping it; however, any earth moving should be done in the
stream channel only. I know I said the site was not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and
would not have to be protected, but the SHPO can disagree with this finding and it may be some time
before I can get a response from them so it may be better to avoid the site to save time. I have sent an
approved form in the mail for your records. I have not seen the CGS packet so if CGS asks for the form
just• fax it to them. I. will send the artifact back to you to return to the landowner in the next day or two.
Thanks. Brant

Sunshine Freedom _ /, ~ (`'~~ ,~ l y~~ _y~~/~ J_~~ - /~~`~ ry
on June 6, 2002 we an-ived at the project area which was located in the Mitchell River
headwaters. Although all of the excavation was to take place in the stream channel itself the
machinery would have to be brought in on a road across a gently sloped terrace in a old
agricultural field. The first shovel test on the most elevated part of the ten-ace was positive
containing two quartz flakes and piece of quartz scatter. The stratigraphy of this shovel test was
recorded as: 0 - 30 centimeters brown sandy loam (7.SYR 4/4) and 30 - 100 centimeters strong
brown (7.SYR 5/6) sandy loam. The upper soils were a combination of plowzone and colluvium
from the slope above. The colluvial deposit over the site was thiiu7er in either direction away
from shovel test 2. From about 90 - 100 centimeters water-rolled cobbles began to show up
probably marking an older base of the creek' chai~lel as it meandered across the valley. The site
was shovel tested on an axis of 15 meter shovel tests parallel to the creek because there was little
gently sloped ten-ace due to the narrowness of the valley. Shovel test 2 included 2 quarts flakes
and a tail chert stemmed projectile point. The point is was based on a large punch struck blade
and was probably abandoned when part of the stem broke off while thinning the Uase of the
point. Shovel test 3 included a 20 cm X 20 cin X 10 cm quarried quartz flaking core, salt
glazed stoneware sherd and an alkaline glazed stoneware sherd. Few of the prehistoric artifacts
came from below the plowzone; therefore the site does not have research quality deposits and
should not be considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
The project will not involve excavation on the terrace where the site is located, but in the actual
stream channel. Heavy equipment may access the creek by driving across the site, but the cap of
colluvium will prevent disturbance to the deposits.
Ban-in~er
On June 6, 2002 I began surface collection on a moist soil unit being constructed in an
agricultural field above a wetland. Much of the dyke construction was complete when we
arrived because the landowner decided to initiate the project by himself with the understanding
that if archaeological sites were found in the project area it may eliminate the federal fiu7ding for
the project. The site was planted in young corn surface visibility was 80%. We began to collect
Late Eighteentli/Early Nineteen Century artifacts which seemed to become more dense as we
approached the highest point on the end of the landfornl. Artifacts recovered include: 2 kaolin
pipe stem fragments, 1 fragment of case bottle glass, l .sherd of shell edge whiteware, 2 pieces of
creamware, 1 sherd of pearlware, 2 sherd of flow-blue whiteware, 3 sherds of hand-painted
whiteware, amzular whiteware, 1 aqua glass sherd possibly used as a tool, 1 piece of embossed
aqua glass, several brick fiaginents and two chert flakes . The bricks had been plowed several
times so that the largest pieces remaining measured no more than Scm ~ Scm. Tlii-ee shovel test
were excavated on an east to west axis on a 30 meter interval to investigate the subsurface
deposits. The first shovel test was placed in the highest point of the landfonn

Brant Loflin To: Laura Fogo/R4/FWS/DOI@FWS
11/04/2002 03:12 PM cc:
Subject: Re: Sunshine Freedom[
The SHPO already concurred so there is nothing left to do. I have not yet filled out an official site form for
the state's records, but this has nothing to do with the project. Sometime this winter I plan to do the form
when things slow down. Right now I am on the road almost every week reviewing projects. If you want I
will send a copy of the form when I am done.
Partner's projects in WY and MT are identical to the restorations projects we looked at on the Mitchell
River. Some of these are quite large (up to 2.5 miles) and involve several agencies. If you ever come to
this part of the world let me know and I can put you in touch with folks in this region who do projects very
similar to yours. Brant

r
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
1875 Century Boulevard
Atlanta, Georgia 30345 O ? ~ 6
2
August 30, 2002
Ms Cecelia Eanes
Sunshine Freedom Association
255 Big Hickory Lane
Dobson, NC 27017
Dear Ms. Eanes:
Enclosed please find an executed copy modification no. 1 to Wildlife Cooperative Extension
Agreement No.1448-40181-02-G-208.
If you have any questions concerning this action, please contact Raymond Neiner, RS Staffing
Contract Specialist, at the above address, Suite 310, or telephone number 404-679-4063.
Sincerely,
,~ n
''/~ /'~ i~ i~.9
// //// -~r~--~~~.
~~/~~a Isaac
~"~`" Chief Division of Contractin
g
and General Services
Enclosure

AGREEMENT NO: 1448-40 i 81-02-G-208
CHARGE CODE: 42550-1121-04HR (FY02)
AMOUNT: $6,000.00
TIN: 561-39-0372
DUNS: 11-421-2959
FAADS: 37-17340-dobson-171-surry-27017-09-09/03/02-09/03/12-habitat restoration-12
MODIFICATION NO. 1
To
WILDLIFE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION AGREEMENT
Between
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
And
SUNSHINE FREEDOM ASSOCIATION
The purpose of this modification is to augment funding for this agreement with an additional
$6,000.00 and e:ctend the period of performance.
1. Amount obligated is revised to read: $21,000.00
2. Paragraph 3 is revised to read:
To allow the habitat developments as described in the Project Plan to
remain in place without interference for a period of 10 years from
September 3, 2002 to September 3, 2012.
All other terms and conditions of this agreement remain the same.
U.S. DEPAi~~ ~ NT OF TERIOR
FISH AND~~ E
TITLE: Donald H. Calder
ac ec
DATE: 0~~3 ~% Z

EXHIBIT A
Project Plan

1. Planned Work: Briefly describe what you expect the project to accomplish.. Explain why this work needs to be done and why it is worth
the Federa/contributions. Include a map and general description of the project property if possible, especially if the final agreement will be filed
with the county property records.
Together with Sunshine Freedom Association, NRCS, the Service, and consulting contractor, we
propose to accomplish restoring approximately 3301inear feet (instream) or approximately 660
linear feet of riparian aquatic habitat on Christian Creek (N. Fork Mitchell River). In addition,
we plan to restore the hydrology on an approximate 1 acre wetland seep located within the same
floodplain. A natural stream design (Rosgen method) utilizing natural features will be
incorporated in the project. A level one assessment will be completed to determine the stream's
dimension, pattern and profile and restoration needs and will be reflected in the stream
restoration plan. Bank stabilization is needed on both sides of Christian Creek. These banks will
be re-sloped and planted with only self-sustaining native trees, shrubs, grasses and annuals.
The bank stabilization and natural stream restoration work needs to be conducted within this
section of Christian Creek to prevent continued stream bank erosion, down-cutting of the stream,
loss of land and loss of extremely valuable aquatic habitat. These waters are rated Outstanding
Resource Waters by the NC Division of Water Quality. Habitat will be restored for numerous
federal trust resource habitat for species such as the federally threatened Bog turtle (S/A),
neotropical migratory birds, native freshwater mussels and brook trout. Together with the
cooperators and other partners in the watershed, this is a top priority to preserve, protect, restore
and enhance the Mitchell River Watershed for water quality, imperiled aquatic resources and
riparian wildlife habitat. See attached maps.
2. Contributions of the Parties: (Specify in detail what each party is contributing toward the total project. i.e. materials,
equipment. persona! or contracted labor, technical assistance, etc. The estimated costs of these contributions and [he schedule for delivering or
completing them may be incorporated here also or in separate sections as shown below. If Service funding is uncertain at this time, use phrases
such as '7G'edera! funding to be determined or approximately $ subject to the availability of funds ".
Cooperat Labor Equipment Materials Funds Tota]
or
Sunshine $6,000 $1,000 $7,000
Fr.
Inkind
NRCS $2,000 $2,000
(tech.
assist.
Surry Soil $2,000 survey equip., $2,000
& Water (tech. computer program
assist.
Master $1,000 hand tools $1,000
Garden
Club
~,: ; ~„ .

• •
USFWS $2,000 Federal Partners for $23,000
(tech Fish & Wildlife
assist.) Program $21,000-
contractorlabor &
materials
Total $13 000 $1 000 $21,000 $35 000
3. Estimated Costs: (Provide a breakout of materials. equipment, technical assistance, work to be contracted or contributed by the Service
and the Cooperator(s). This establishes a basis for the Service's funding decision. Total estimated cost =Service shore + Cooperator(s)'share.
The Service's share should equal that shown in the termination clause of the agreement.
Materials will include river stone, erosion control jute matting, trees, shrubs, live stakes, native
warm season grasses, perennials and annuals. The project area for the stream bank restoration is
approximately 330 feet long x 40 feet wide (20-25 foot minimum vegetated buffer on each side)
which equals 13,200 square feet or .30 acre. Total estimated costs for materials are pending at
this time until a design is complete. The design will be provided by technical assistance from the
Service, NRCS and Surry Soil and Water Conservation District.
Labor will be conducted by a contractor Sunshine Freedom chooses. The district has a
recommended list of contractors who conduct stream restoration. Estimated cost for actual
construction of the project is between $50-80 per foot. Additional funds may have to be
acquired to complete the project. Once the design is complete, final estimates can be obtained.
Total Costs: Inkind labor and equipment from Sunshine Freedom and Garden Club: vegetative
plantings,_$8,000._
_. _
USFWS funding for labor and vegetation materials = $21,000.
Inkind technical assistance = $6,000
Total project cost is approximately $35,000.
If funding permits within this grant, the wetland seep restoration. will be conducted by filling in a
man-made ditch, otherwise it will be covered in another Partners for Fish and Wildlife grant for
the Mitchell River.
4. Work Schedule: (Specify what has to be done and by whers in order for the Service to accept the project and pay any progress
invoices and the final invoice.)
The schedule for completing this project is 5 years from Summer 2002 (June 2007). The design
phase will take approximately 6 months to 1 year to complete. Once a restoration plan is
complete and all necessary Federa1404 wetland and State 401 water quality certification is
obtained, work may proceed. The permit process for a Nationwide Permit No. 27 for stream
restoration from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers will take approximately 6-9 months. The
actual stream restoration work should take approximately 7 or less days. The restoration work
should take place in the fall-winter of 2003-2004 so the trees and shrubs will have better survival
rates.
Once work is contracted, before the actual work takes place, please contact project manager
Laura Fogo to schedule restoration work so other partners may assist. Funding may be made in
advance or in partial payments when necessary when work needs to be done or is completed.

• •
Please submit invoices for payment to the project manager.

;., ^~...r~f s. ~~wa tZ~"~`.^~;"~""`.`~.:: -f~+,~..w ~~ .,3~:..~_. .. - -'3'mti_ .... s._.:..:~ l r•~
n sxk sa.~.i• ~ I [ ~ ` ~ ~~' ~ ~ .C
.._ e Yf/ k" _-_-
s PY_ aare~ ... ,. .~
UNITED STATES DEPAsZTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
-___,~,ati,;c: • ~`~; ::-- "~.i' ail;: ~:ater C~.lse-~ratirl C c
L___- ,.~... _. __. ...----. ~ ---- --_._.__.- .___ _ _____ _ _ ._,. , .
..
~~.>, rr-s-~ t- t i..- irr
Y~ ~ '
~' .. _
~. " ` ..' t
...
,. 1. Cx ~. ,....
.., ... _._._ ~.~ v __. ____. t ~
K _ .'.' Tom: «~..a- 1~ ,:;<.i~~=>r~v.5k',~S~K?~.~u~. .... ;aaRa ~ ,n, ;,.:-..~.
~ ~+ a. s~ ~ syt~'` ^•
t~ ,'.~ k~....t%_ !T± t .'~r~~ 1;,a '~ - n^ ~„` .. .Yr~ ~ ~ `t. ,+. tt ha^,
s ,~~~`Ls i cc: ~^
S .- a ' '~' '~"
+t' ~ U 1.3, e1 7 ~, .sK : ~ f 4 f Z ~ ~ - !~ .1 ~""a
~S-I _.a~"~~„ eta' ~t~~ : ~ ~ ~ ~.z - ~ '.. ~
~` a -•.?`~'~ _ - vH Ir -. ~,'i i,'~ :-~ ~~,1~ yea ~ .. ~''~ ~
_ i ~• ;' "' -y- F'ry` 3' y Yr' .H r qG /t ~ ~• ."P 'j + . `k~+~, ~ `ti '
i h&
_ •±
q 1 ~~ t .'~' ~. ~. ~ _ ~ trj ~.-k ..r~~ ~ ~~ :~
~t.J•' ;;-~''c` ~ ~ t~ z~ ::~.~'i- a~ z;~~ ~,ew''- ...r-,yr ~W~~~~ s~ ~ ~, '•'~ •'r~"~~M..
!'
.~ +3
Y _ _ Y~~ rip -m' ~rM `'_~' '.. ¢ ) ... xt~ ,k ~.
~. „_ ~
t r ,,per. ~FY
y~.~ Y
~ *X it
_ w Y .. -ors fix ~ `^ - ;~.
~~ ~ ~'~ +~ .Trr. ~..-
- •-,-~ -c 3 rr _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_.
. YF ~ i~ ~ ~:.4 ~ ZA -. ~j -~t,'"C~.{... _:i i.a~. rr ~ i r ~ es.,,,er ,.,~-ts.Y
~ ~~~'~ ~~ a 4.5 4 _'~ ~ ~~ ~ ~''~,"~r ~~
~_.
~ ~ s. .*~' +'~'-
k .~~"AA`~~---YAP r ~i`~" ,~ ~ ,~~~ ~~ r.~~-r ,~^ s~,r~i`.
.3 .Vr< .c, ~~ .. -~. , - ~-
r _ ...
~.
i, 'c Y ~~'.~ may.,",. , : , `_~ • ~ ~ y. ,#, !.ar',~' ~'` ~ ~. r , ~ ~~ 3~ ~'_ .
~ v 1~ N ~ +~ ~3~ ~ Y !k'. .? ~ ~ ~ .qj5 -:~ a•.., y,. ?A 4 ~.y, - , ° M ...
r
~~ s.., ~ . ' ~ w¢x Yi.~'+ " r 'v"'~"' ±~
. A~ .•y... .y Lax,..., ' ~ ,` t ,~ "~`~ ~ t zj ~~ ~ ~ ~A,+" -f.
t
may. >/ _ L. ...,y(~K ~~ -zY
^~ ~ ~.~ ~ 1'~ S...k T,Y'~" ~'~ t ~'^tsnYY.-a ±~.n i i ~ ~ .~ ~-3 . ` ~.. i'+~;..
k
r

~ f
'037
4036
'035
27'30"
eo34
o << ` ~ ~~
o ~ ~
// O
~~~ ~
_ o
~: ~ ,~ C
3o L
=o~
~~ ;~~ ~
~o ~
~ :~ ,
,_~ ~; ,~
f ',`-a
rn
N ~
o e `• `~
/~
1233 ~ °~
o
~1
~~
' ~', ° ~
\ ~
,~
~ ~_
,~
.~J~ ~~
'`, i%~,
%~~\\~
~J
~\\\
0

~ J ~, .
~~'<~' '
~~ j~ ~~~((i~`~f
'~~~~(r~=~~;~
~~~, ~ ~~
o ~o.~ ~~ . \ ~~ ~,~ ~~
~=, ) ~~ - ;~ : i ill
~~~ n°' ,~. ~ ~, ~~~
~~ ~J ~~
„~
~~ \\ o
o;t ~,~~,
4 ~ ~~ ~) 111 ~ ~ f "~~. ,
/ ,
~~~~~ ~ Rti 135 ~~ ~Il
~ ,, ~ ~~
.~-~
_ j3o ~G/
~(~. l X11 ~~ ~\ M~
~~=
~~i~ ~ ° i
q ~ o ~,
~~ ~
r S ~ p` ;
// ~\
\ ~ /200--~~~
~ ~~
~~~
y ~~ ~ c
s ,~
p ~ ~, `.~
~ ~\C.~ ~~
q~ ~ - ~ ~, (~
\ ~ O
~~// ~ ` ~
c
,;~~ ...-
o ~~ ,
s ~~
e ~ i / ~ , ~~
,; ~ , ,
~ ~~ ~-~-
~~ ~ ,
p~~
~,,,, '~ ~
~, ~--
~,
~~ ~ ~ ~:
~~~
\ ,300 ~~~~;- ~~ ~,
~ ~~ ~ ~;
\~ /~ l344' ~~ i ~~..
°, _ __
~~ '~ `~
~~ mil : ~ ~~
(((l '! ~I ~~:
~„~~ :~

Y...
S ._ _ t:~Cy'*' j~ ' 4s~R~ti1~'. ~'` . -•"c ~ 2. ~~ ~++w. `~~~ i ~ ._. ~L.:. _. ~.. 1~`~'•r'! ^ •
..
j _
s• ~.
..
., :,
r , ,
~.rr.,... r r ~ ,t' ~ ~ ~ 1.. J .. l l O ~ rc t .~ c. t 3 {
U!.~'Tc_G 5TAT~5 DEP~.!=<TM~NT Or AGRICULTURc 50i~ CO~IS~RVATION ScRV1CE
....-
.. -
^ •~~. ~
~~ -
r ~ .~I. nn
,- ~ - • - -
_
.... - .~4 ..a .. ~' ~4~ip • inn C'
' . i.r ~:...... t ~...r_..
_ '~'.; -yir,-.C~.~i-• ~S'Jb~iv~ fh._:.., ti. ,. .;~ P~ro..Z mss` y0: }1 '.. n
s .
,["
i _ .'
-S; £~"' _Y.r7i" ` ~ ., 7~ ~~ ~ ~M .1~JSa` ri,. ~. ~i , ~'at 3*i y Y -.,
.. ,. f y '`.~~,,,,- ~- Tr t "~ .t1'a~:"etc' a~ - ~ ~ ~.~ i~ e P .'~'~y y,,,,,r a ~.~"
~. ~ +q,d a..,ay ,~ u. ,~^~' 3 ,~'
~' ~ ~ wt «.< s ~ ~ ~ ~n i.Y-- t r H~z ~ ~~ ~~-3'-Ct `~..v~~F~!Y~~'r's_ 't h S` ` ~ "~,~.'6M;~' f 4,~~ ~ ~~ - r'
~ A.'-~'~r ;.. .,r.. .vQ ~ s ~'c i "r' ~'~ F, 3`" a ' "sP 'a 's-1 r"` ~Y
~,~. ~,.4 M~ kw ,igr~~b~ ,, 'f .~ .., ~ "~., m ~
.f ^~F: " "7t i vp°~ 7~ ter, a "~ . 'u~~ ~ .~kard'..4s~'~..
~ w s ~ ~
_ ~``__
., y ~ _
` ~ K _,.
ar. ,ey -
~* ~ ~ ^ _
y3 Y _
{> F. s~ Y _ ~' ~ Ste' f• . ) ~:L'L ~` ~ K
t ~hF ' ~-a. .1f. ~ y G W I1 - M III' ~ Z ~3 - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ iM
-
~.
_~
:..
„ _
lid ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ .ti ~~ f ~ ` s~~~+''°'
s .~ -> _ - ..,~. Z ,
a _ ~, ~ a.~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- #..~
..... e
v `= ~ .
~ l
_ ? v c
_ g 1 -r 4 i'rY .~p _ i
;~:- .' t ~ '~'
9 - ~ 7
jjg,,~.., r4T r ~ ~. ', r3._S 12".' ~' ~ ,. 7~ ~~~~"~c ~ r. ~~
. _
x .,
,. ,- - r'
r~. ~, ~ ~ r~'?~,.k-~ ~.• Z~ f E:~ y1 :fit? b; i .
.F ~~~
~ av Y" 1- J
~ i~_~.a v.:3` .~ ,~ _•~ ". ~ ~.tu ~~ ~.~+. ~.. '~_+F-y stir ~ ..
F ~y~., " t~ _
.,
.. a
' ~ _
.- ,;
- ~ ~ ~* ~ ~
,~ ,'
~~ ~ rr ~~~ ~3~ ,~~ SFr .:.t~+t1'~ .~ _. ~ ~ .~a~-~. ~ F
-,. her i ~ 5 ~ k ~ ~k ~s~*k~ KSr; -mob. a4 r~ x~l r
' :~1~~ ; ~,~ ~ ~~ _ tom' S'~+~. ~ ~ _ s" t.; S ~ ~ .. ~.
m i. 4 ° ~,.~.. w a f, ata' a ~ ~ " .rr.~°,S
w
~ '~` ,~ ~,`te ~f-~'"'~ ~ ..~.- ''~ < ',-s ~~ 4s ~ ..yam ~ ~ J?
L4' t '~
x. X ~ •~ tF'~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..., x
~ r i4 ~
c
"~" .+:
~saT..~> ~a~ar ~.

om ~ „_.` ...,fit ~: -
~ ~ s' `s ~ ~ ~

+ y~
".'4~i
Y
. - ~ ~ ~ r'. ~ x ~
' ~ '-
- ~ ~,~rt"' ~ -y.
^ Cio ,
~4 ~}-'"s

` - F
- ~
z .
_,
.
t. _ -`a

'Y
~ SQIL MAP .-~;
~Y.
~,
__. _. w ~
N
USDA. 501E CONSERVATION SERVICE COOPERATING WIT;i THE STATE AGRICULTUR?,L EXPERIMENT
~ ~~Y _. SOIL & v~ATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
5 T A T I O N AND THE _ ------. _ ..- -- -- _ - ~ -..... _.... _..-----=--_ ..
w'
~ 1P" }a;~s,~zr~ ;±rnor?Cii~l S.S,;lc-_ --- `JNt'r~3tC!' -- -_...._. _ _ . -- ---- ___._ ~ l~r __ ~..
~' ~ CODE' I'fy, w... ~ 1r~
S!I~'_' .

CONSERVA t 1UN NLan mHr ~.
~-
Approx. Scale i 6b0" ~ ~ z~
,~
~ Iv ` ----- io _r
Preparc'~ By ,__ ._ ._. ..
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SO{L CONSERVATION SERVECE
Cooperating ~,vit-t u1=~Z'I __ _._ ___ Scii and'~1Jater Conservation, District
~.inshine Freedoz ~3sn. ^_Operator Date _.
Owner - -------
Acres County ~=~'~' State N• v• Sheet & Code .do. _ ra.r_ t~r,_~~~_2~

Page 1 of 1
Thanks Ron,
We plan on starting the project in May, which is after trout spawning season. We will be using stringent erosion
control measures. The project is located on a flat terrace. Stockpiled materials and other disturbed land will be
surrounded by sift fence. Phasing the project will not be an issue since the disturbance of soils will be limited to
only what work can be accomplished and stabilized on a daily basis.
Mark Fowlkes
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
P. O. Box 387
Elkin, NC 28621
336/527-1547
336/527-1548 FAX
ma rkfow I ke~e a rth I i n k. n et
www.ncwildlife.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Linville [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:53 AM
To: 'Mark Fowlkes'
Subject: RE: Sunshine Freedom Association Enhancement Plan
Hey Mark, since there appear to be some wild Brown trout in the area, not doing the project during the
trout spawning season would be better if possible. You should also stay on lookout for listed species.
The project should help trout and other aquatics anyway. Since the area due its classification does
require stringent erosion controls, it'd be better to do this in phases -work and stabilize a short work
section, then move on to the next section. Do you think you could do this in 4 sections, 1 at a time? Let
me know what you think and I'll send a memo to the COE and DWQ for you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Fowlkes [maiRo:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:11 AM
To: Linville, 3.Ron WRC-HC
Subject: FW: Sunshine Freedom Association Enhancement Plan
Ron,
Attached find the Sunshine Freedom Association Stream and Wetland Enhancement Plan. It
would be great to get an email supporting this project.
We won't start work until the middle of May.
Mark Fowlkes
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
P. O. Box 387
Elkin, NC 28621
3361527-1547
336/527-1548 FAX
markfowlkes@earthlink. net
www.ncwildlife.org
4/3/2007