090035_Inspection_20200707

C Division of Water Resources QQ 54113 147 W
Facility Number 1 - 3 7 0 Division of Soil and Water Con',ervabon
0 Other Agency SD
Type of Visit: i Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: diRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: riRtm Arrival Time:(e,Q S 4 I Departure Time:15 30 TT County: t'1 JW Region: FA-1
Farm Name: _ci vt,'G 42Li Sew /''^'t Owner Email:
l7 D
Owner Name: / e°'1 F-0,"t-f 1 NC, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: A j LW Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 4i7..`-kFav1 Integrator: Pi '- s
Certified Operator: 4 -S (,1k 4- ,tik.
P frvIvk Al Certification Number: 2 6 D Z-p
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 0 D 3 S/ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish L000 9 q T Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 5 bi) 67.33 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca.aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIEZI-- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars is Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IMINEMEI
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®'l I7o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes E No ©'1GA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 13 A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YesIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: °l- 3 7 'Date of Inspection: zO'rV
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes IIFIC ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No EINA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): r 1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E'No D NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA D NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 21No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. 0 Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable.CCrop `Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
G13
12. Crop Type(s): -IYuy S'G /
13. Soil Type(s): CG�'1*, &yivt tfkyr- L2 Of.4
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 11:1440 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �"'" ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 121.1(6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 111,1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 24 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP 0 Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LJ [lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: / - (Date of Inspection: srsi '20-
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes El ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes IlKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes I:610 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
i .-014-1o,/t •— - I`l_ I
5 I a, 11T7611
D o„,(-4
lot.06c
o ( .1- 5t,d yc,
cal coo- Sot - 65 .51
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Zia Pi,kLC'p Phone:lit) -"l 3 3 33 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: lq) C. Date: 7 z-i{,l. 2.o - 7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015