090035_Inspection_20200805

icision of Water Resources VI it ` G -z-Onp
Facility Number 1 - .3 5 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: et-eGm lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: b b Arrival Time:mi� Departure Time:MEr County: 'v"e` l Region:Pia ti
Farm Name: gLI C.4 ly 1-i.����-�fr Sys ��G -- �e �O7S, I LC Owner Email:
Owner Name: [( CEO Phone:
�
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ,( 2'_
Facility Contact: CliK,( FS $ 4't`(/1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: l l Integrator: P rZ S► "y c
Certified Operator: 6 y'rc,1 Gee rO NOV65. Certification Number: f oc f 38/
Back-up Operator: Safi 5-e 15 0nt 5 Certification Number: /CU 7 2(-
PI
Location of Farm: Latitude: -_ Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish tiL (o 1 j/E9 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean _ Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca,aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish - MIEEMI -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IIIMMINII
Other El Turke Poults
(Other El Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [S].4- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑'1`1A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No ❑ I'h�A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Et NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes Q'l�io ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [�]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: et - 3-5 Date of Inspection: 5 4-u 6&20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El-N6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 37
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ < ❑ NA El NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ICTO ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1114Po ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): l i a - (r 0
i1
13. Soil Type(s): 'KcA-115 vt 1.(t°
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®-o ❑ NA El NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q Igo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes EP< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12r< ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Of - (3S 'Date of Inspection: . C -zs2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [/<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes I1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 1 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ®'I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1:2'�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®W ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yesd'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [I�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cot,tilo,ettork // 91“+c_ 5tot./tati I
Now L-5 4)-L,'7
1:1-7 ,a C-e 5 po 4-'1 1 ttA. a2 VsCA
to 0--1 �(-t'k'C 7 66 c. i-c,c, 1 ,
pto,„•--kk, tiA-- pt-e_ bi-'4-61A-7
E2t, e_ klcul 4L04-- keE5 (.1 4-0/9-
c-4 tl (11 30S
Reviewer/Inspector Name: lj ositt- -p Phone: I!O--43 3-,3m
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Lli ptilAILfDate: c 4 V G 2a0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015