HomeMy WebLinkAbout090032_Inspection_20200206 rD vision of Water Resources
Facility Number 3=2- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: JarrOmplia ce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:J[Q Arrival Time: //a2 Y Departure Time: 4q,'30 County: a ' Region: /�V
Farm Name: /t«t 7J D f tF 3 �Gt//7k-' Owner Email:
Owner Name: -� `�t//`� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: } •2 A^0// t Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L5 -cc_ Integrator: ii Tlt-/�
Certified Operator: C56 e Certification Number: /65423
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
‘-'-Feeder to Finish OW 3eDo _Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca aci Po'. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish • _— Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars II Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other NI Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No D NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑rN ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
'Facility Number: 9- - .s..--- 'Date of Inspection: 49`- , Y
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): / }
Observed Freeboard(in): p?7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a El Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ®es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [frNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require L Yes No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ZI' es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): BjeyKule 4c/c.d.-ye-ea
13. Soil Type(s): t7 1-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes IE o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Er<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Do record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ZINCWaste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
Facility Number: �' -�v�— 'Date of Inspection: 0.1—(0-z
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
O Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Eri":10 0 NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes lE 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [i]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(g.), 77/307_ (--,---.,t117/ a-6-11 "1'6 /7r-44'4"----cinr--5-
/4473 91)..4e**e' 2 r 749 I 74 aif 7 7"11".4 1,""1-"4"
' 77,7 Nam- Vr'17a`i-if bc'
01, )te17/1—
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Sr — Phone: 9 7 3 '0(5
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: c '` Date: "---lo,di10
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015