20201435 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20201112

-a
November 11, 2020
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attention: Mr. Gary Beecher
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Mr. Paul Wojoski
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD — Rockfish Creek
Hoke County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
Dear Mr. Beecher and Mr. Wojoski:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this notification to inform
you of work they plan to conduct in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) 12 and the corresponding
North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 4133. The project entails emergency repair and
relocation activities associated with a segment of natural gas pipeline in Hoke County, North Carolina, and
will involve no loss of waters of the U.S.
The application and accompanying support information is being submitted through the NCDWR E-PCN
website (https:Hedocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Pre-Construction_ Notification_Form\). The supporting
information submitted online consists of the following:
Figures: Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map Exhibit (Figure 2), Hoke County Soil
Survey Exhibit (Figure 3) and Impact Exhibit (Figure 4)
Jurisdictional Delineation Information
Site Photographs
Agent Authorization Form
Easement Exhibit (RLS Surveying & Consulting)
HDD Plan and Profile Drawings (Stimmel Associates)
NCNHP and FWS IPaC Reports
Mitigation Credit Availability Letter
General Restoration Plan
Inadvertent Return Contingency Plan
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

= a Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
III Hoke County, North Carolina
EEL-
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
A copy of this PCN is being provided to the N.C. Division of Water Resources as a courtesy. The project as
proposed should comply with the relevant conditions of General Water Quality Certification No. 4133, and
as such, does not require pre -construction written approval.
The activities described in this submittal will not result in permanent placement of dredged or fill material
or loss of waters of the U.S. However, approximately 0.22 acre of forested wetlands will be converted to
herbaceous wetlands to accommodate a new portion of permanently maintained easement (Figure 4). In
addition, approximately 0.20 acre of herbaceous wetlands located within the existing easement may be
temporarily impacted for placement of timber equipment mats such that logging equipment can access
the proposed new easement and remove the timber.
General Project Information
PNG is planning to relocate a damaged segment of the Line 5 natural gas transmission pipeline. The
segment of gas line that will be replaced is located north of Arabia Road and south of Pittman Grove
Church Road in Hoke County, North Carolina (34.950169°N /-79.063565°W). The location of the project
area is depicted on the attached figures.
The damaged segment of pipe will be abandoned in place, and a new pipe will be installed next to the old
one by horizontal directional drill (HDD). Use of HDD will allow for avoidance of direct impacts to Rockfish
Creek and the adjacent wetlands.
Existing Environment
The project area consists of PNG's existing 50-foot wide permanently maintained easement and adjacent
forested wetland area. The wetlands consist of periodically inundated riverine swamp forest that abuts the
run of Rockfish Creek. Additional temporary workspace to accommodate the drilling equipment will be
located in higher ground areas on both sides of the wetlands.
Topography in the area generally slopes gently towards the creek and its floodplain, but more steeply on
the south side of the creek than the north. Within and near wetter portions of the site, overstory
vegetation included swamp blackgum (Nysso sylvatica v. biflora), red maple (Ater rubrum) and occasional
bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). Species observed in portions of the proposed easement where
standing water was not present included red maple, tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) and sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua). Mid -story vegetation included Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), sweetgum and
sweet bay (Magnolia virginica). Understory vegetation included giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), soft
rush (Juncus effusus), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum), and shallow sedge (Carex lurida).
Vines included laurel -leaved catbriar (Smilax laurifolia) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).
Adjacent upland vegetation included loblolly pine (Pinus toedo), American holly (Ilex opaca), Chinese
privet and sweetgum. Vines included muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), catbriar (S. rotundifolia) and
yellowjasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens).

Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
Hoke County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
According to the Hoke County Soil Survey (Figure 3), soils mapped in the project area primarily include
Blaney loamy sand, Gilead loamy sand, Johnston loam, Lakeland sand and Pactolus loamy sand. Johnston
loam is classified hydric.
Rockfish Creek flows through the southern portion of the project area. Rockfish Creek is a perennial
tributary and, at this location, consists of a typical meandering, sand bed coastal plain swamp stream with
a braided pattern and an indefinitely defined bed and bank.
On October 1, 2020, S&ME personnel visited the proposed project site to delineate jurisdictional surface
waters located therein. We followed the procedures set forth in the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation
Manual. The project is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province. Conditions were documented
using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, as appropriate. One wetland area (WA) that
abuts both sides of Rockfish Creek was delineated (Figure 4).
A majority of WA was characterized as a Coastal Plain riverine swamp forest. The wetland exhibited both
areas of apparent semi -permanent inundation and drier areas where standing water was not present and
facultative vegetation was dominant. Soils within the wetland areas were hydric and exhibited the
presence of muck and a depleted matrix. Additional wetland hydrologic indicators observed included
water -stained leaves, water marks and crayfish burrows. Information relative to the delineation and
photographs of typical conditions observed within the project area are included in the information
submitted online.
Description of the Proposed Work and Impacts
To install the new pipe, the HDD rig will be staged on the south side of the swamp. Temporary workspace
will be established in higher ground to accommodate the rig and stage the pipe. Ground disturbance
from minor grading, leveling of workspace and establishment of staging and stockpile areas should be
limited to higher ground areas in this area.
The HDD rig will begin drilling a pilot hole north to the new easement area established adjacent to the
existing easement. Different drill heads will then be used to widen the pilot hole to a diameter sufficient to
accommodate the new pipe. Specialized fluid will be pumped into and circulated through the hole in
order to prevent its collapse prior to pipe insertion. The pipe that will be used for the new line will be
staged and strung in the existing easement in the northern portion of the project area. The pipe segments
will be welded together and inspected for structural integrity, and then will be pulled through the hole
drilled by the HDD rig. Once the pipe is pulled through, both ends will be welded to the existing pipe, and
the old segment of pipe will be retired. An Inadvertent Return (IR) contingency Plan is included with the
information submitted online.
Vegetation removal within the new easement will require that mechanized timbering equipment work in
the wetland area. Equipment will work on 16-foot wide equipment mats staged along the eastern edge of
the existing easement, and timber will be hauled from the wetland and properly disposed of at a
permitted landfill. Areas within the proposed permanently maintained corridor that will be cleared of
aboveground woody vegetation will be maintained in an herbaceous state. Additional temporary
workspaces to be cleared will be seeded and allowed to naturally re -vegetate. Appropriate erosion and
3

=0
Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
Hoke County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
sediment control practices outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual" and approved by the local governing authority will be
installed to help prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features as a result of the work. Placement of
some sediment and erosion control measures may be required in the wetland area during logging
operations, but will not exceed the footprint of the permitted disturbance limits.
Project -wide, approximately 0.22 acre of forested wetlands will be permanently converted to herbaceous
wetlands, and an additional 0.20 acre will be temporarily impacted for equipment access. The wetland
impacts associated with the proposed project will result first from clearing and temporary placement of
timber equipment mats and targeted stump removal, if necessary, to provide a level work surface and
prevent extensive rutting. Following clearing, the new easement will be permanently maintained. Impacts
to Rockfish Creek are not anticipated, as logging equipment will either avoid the stream by working within
the adjacent area from the north and south or construct of a temporary equipment bridge that will span
the active channel.
Following construction, temporarily disturbed wetlands within the easement will be restored to their
original grades and contours and seeded with a native wetland seed mix. There should be no loss of
waters, as only conversion and temporary ground disturbance from equipment access and logging
operations will be required.
Protected Species
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543),
S&ME conducted a search of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database to identify
element occurrences (EOs) of such species listed as potentially occurring near the project corridor. An
October 5, 2020 report generated from the findings of the NCNHP database review indicated that there
are no documented occurrences of federally -protected species within one mile of the project area. S&ME
also consulted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
website to obtain a list of federally protected species that may be present within the county. Review of the
IPaC report identified the following documented occurrences of federally protected species in Hoke
County as summarized in Table 1:
Table 1: Federally -Protected Species Summary
Common Name
Red -cockaded woodpecker
Scientific Name
Picoides borealis
Federal Status
E
County Status
Current
American alligator
Alligator mississippiensis
T(S/A)
Current
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly
Neonympho mitchellii francisci
E
Current
American chaffseed
Schwalbea americana
E
Current
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Current
Rough -leaved loosestrife
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
E
Current
E= Endangered ; T = Threatened ; T(S/A) = Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance
4

= a Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
III Hoke County, North Carolina
r` S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
Copies of the NCNHP and IPaC database reports are included in the information submitted online.
Following project scoping and literature review, S&ME conducted a field assessment for the presence of
federally protected terrestrial species listed in Table 1. Descriptions of the species obtained from the
available online USFWS species descriptions, or as noted otherwise, are provided below.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Biological Determination: No Effect
Red -cockaded woodpecker measure approximately seven inches long and have black and white
horizontal stripes on its back. The cheeks and underparts are white, and the sides are streaked in black.
The cap and stripe on the throat and neck of the bird are black. Male individuals of the species have a
small red spot on each side of the black cap and display a red crown patch after the first post -fledgling
molt. The woodpecker's diet consists primarily of insects.
Red -cockaded woodpecker's range is closely linked to the distribution of mature stands of southern pines.
Longleaf and loblolly pines that are 60 years old or greater are most commonly selected for nesting and
roosting trees. The woodpecker excavates nest and roost cavities in trees that are stressed, and often are
infected with red -heart rot fungus. Preferred nesting sites generally include relatively open, park -like,
mature pine stands with a suppressed mid -story layer. Suppression of the mid -story by fire or mechanical
means in mature pine stands promotes colonization by the red -cockaded woodpecker. Foraging habitat is
frequently limited to pine or pine -hardwood stands that are 30 years old or greater with a preference for
pine trees with a diameter of 10 inches or larger. Dense hardwood mid -story hampers foraging by red -
cockaded wood -pecker and increases the occurrence of cavity competitors. The USFWS indicates that the
maxi -mum foraging radius from a colony site for red -cockaded woodpecker's is typically one-half mile or
less.
The project area was visually assessed for the presence of potential red -cockaded woodpecker foraging
and nesting habitat during the October 1, 2020 field review. The project area is located within and
adjacent to forested land that consists largely of hardwood species. No large stands of pine that were
mature enough to contain suitable nesting habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker were observed.
Given the lack of suitable habitat within the project area and the limited work that will occur there, the
red -cockaded woodpecker should not be affected as a result of this project.
American Alligator
Biological Determination: N/A
The American alligator is listed as Threatened by the federal government because of its similarity in
appearance to the American crocodile (Crocody(us ocutus), which is currently limited to between 500 and
1,200 individuals in the United States, limited in range to the southern tip of Florida. Because American
alligator is listed under similarity of appearance, it is not biologically endangered and not subject to
section 7 consultation.
5

-a
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly
Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
Hoke County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Saint Francis' satyr is a small, dark brown butterfly. The wingspan for the species ranges from 34 to 44
millimeters. Saint Francis' satyr has conspicuous "eye spots" on the lower surfaces of the wings. These eye
spots have a dark maroon -brown center, and within the eye spots are lighter opalescent patches that
reflect a silver cast. The border of these dark eye spots is straw -yellow in color, with an outermost border
of dark brown. The eye spots are usually round to slightly oval and are well -developed on the fore wing as
well as on the hind wing. The spots are accented by two bright orange bands along the posterior wing
edges and two somewhat darker orange -brown bands across the central portion of each wing.
Habitat for this species consists primarily of wide, wet meadows dominated by a high diversity of sedges
along small stream corridors. These meadows are often remnants of beaver activity and/or periodic
wildfires. Additionally, subpopulations of the satyr occur in artillery ranges on Ft. Bragg where the lack of
roads, frequent fires, and beavers have allowed butterfly habitats to persist.
The project area does not consist of suitable habitat for this species. Accordingly, the project is not
expected to impact Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly.
Michaux's Sumac
Biological Determination: No Effect
Michaux's sumac is a non-poisonous, low -growing, deciduous, densely hairy shrub. The erect stems grow
from an underground rhizome to a height of one to three feet. The compound leaves are alternate and
divided into long rows of 9 to13 stalkless leaflets. The leaflets are 1.6 to 3.5 inches long, oblong, winged at
the base, dull on the top, hairy on the bottoms, with toothed edges. The terminal leaflet has a two inch
long winged petiole. Flowers grow at the top of the plant in a dense, erect cluster, colored greenish -
yellow to white, and are four -to five -parted. Fruit are hairy reddish drupes, each containing one seed.
Leaves emerge in April to May, flowering occurs April to June, and fruiting occurs August to October with
fruits persisting for several months. These plants are generally dioecious. Michaux sumac has been known
to produce male flowers one year and female flowers the next. Other individuals are monoecious with
both male and female flowers at one time.
Usually less than half of the stems in a subpopulation do not flower in a given season. Even though fruit
may be plentiful, seed viability is low. This may be a result of self -incompatibility or hybridization with
other Rhus. This species usually produces asexually from thick, shallow horizontal rhizomes.
Michaux sumac prefers sandy, loamy swales and depressions, acidic and circumneutral uplands, and rocky
open woods. It grows best where disturbance has maintained an open area. Michaux sumac has been
found along roadsides, in powerline clearings, and areas where forest canopies have been opened up by
blowdowns and/or hurricane damage. Episodic fires accentuate habitat for this species and reduce
hardwood encroachment, recycle nutrients, and aid regeneration of longleaf pine/wiregrass communities.
N.

Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
III Hoke County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
Pedestrian field review for Michaux's sumac was conducted within the project corridor on October 1,
2020, when this species is fully -leafed out and identifiable by vegetative characteristics. No individuals or
populations of this species were observed.
American Chaff seed
Biological Determination: No Effect
American chaffseed is an erect, densely hairy, unbranched perennial, one -to -two feet tall. Leaves are
alternate, 0.8-1.6 inches tall and 0.2-0.4 inch wide, and attach directly to the stalk without a leaf stem. Each
leaf has three noticeable veins. Its flowers are grouped in a long terminal cluster. Numerous seeds are
enclosed in a loose -fitting, sac -like structure that provides the basis for the common name, chaffseed.
Showy, insect -pollinated flowers occur in May -June, with fruits maturing in August. The fruit is a brown,
dry dehiscent capsule, narrowly oval -shaped, about 0.4 inches long. The seeds are numerous, flat, and
winged. Fire appears to be a requirement for long-term viability, strongly affecting the reproductive
success by controlling conditions necessary for successful seed germination. American chaffseed occurs in
fire -maintained longleaf pine flatwoods and savannas.
The project area does not consist of a fire -maintained longleaf pine flatwoods or savannah, and no
individuals resembling this species were observed on -site. Based on these results, it is not anticipated that
this project will affect populations of American chaffseed.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
Biological Determination: No Effect
Rough -leaved loosestrife is a perennial, colonial herb growing from a rhizome to heights of one to two
feet. Rough -leaved loosestrife flowers from May through June, with yellow flowers. The primary habitat for
rough -leaved loosestrife is the transition zone between longleaf pine stands and pond pine pocosins.
These areas are dominated by grass and shrubs. This species depends on frequent fire or other
disturbance (such as mowing) to decrease competition with more aggressive species. Preferred habitat
includes wet areas with peat or organic soils that are poorly drained. The species is crowded out by the
absence of fire or other disturbance.
The project area does not contain pond pine pocosins or longleaf pine stands, no individuals of this
species were observed during the site survey. Accordingly, it is not anticipated that this project will affect
populations of rough -leaved loosestrife.
Historic Resources
To assist you with determination of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) of 1966, S&ME conducted a review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation office GIS
database for structures that are eligible for listing within a one -mile radius of the project site. Review of
this database indicated that there are no sites eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places
within 0.5-mile of the site. We understand that you will handle completion of the Section 106 process.
7

-a
Avoidance and Minimization
Pre -Construction Notification
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD— Rockfish Creek
Hoke County, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7335-20-104
Impacts will be minimized by PNG's use of HDD to install the new pipe. Impacts will be further minimized
by use of appropriate sediment and erosion control measures during construction, and restoration of
temporarily -affected areas following completion of the work. Additionally, construction equipment
operating within wetlands will be limited to that necessary for clearing and restoration activities.
Mitigation
The project will not result in a loss of waters of the U.S., but will result in conversion of 0.22 acre of
forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands. We anticipate that mitigation for the conversion impacts will
be required at a 1:1 ratio. Accordingly, PNG proposes to satisfy that requirement through purchase of 0.22
acre of credit in the appropriate HUC (Cape Fear 04) from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (see
mitigation availability letter is included in the information submitted online.
The project will comply with applicable conditions of NWP No.12 and WQC No. 4133, and will not result in
changes in pre -construction elevation contours or affect dimension, pattern or profile of the wetland area
or associated creek. Affected portions of the wetland area will be restored in accordance with the attached
Restoration Plan following completion of the work.
Closing
Thank you for your review of this PCN. If you have questions or need additional information, please feel
free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Project Manager
Senior Review by Jason S. Reeves, P.E., Principal Engineer
M.

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes IT No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201435
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Coburn:eads\cccoburn
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Line 5 Section 1 Emergency HDD — Rockfish Creek
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Joey Lawler, PWS
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11/12/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Rockfish Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
B
Version#*
1
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
34.9502160-79.0635480
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID# Version
20201435 1
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
10/8/2020
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf 50.98KB
A. Processing Information C^U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Hoke

Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
V 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
PNG Line 5 HDD — Rockfish Creek DMS Acceptance Letter.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
1 - Edith Jackson Fitzgerald Trust ; 2 - Robert M Sineath
2b. Deed book and page no.:
1 - 299/790 ; 2 - 453/540
2c. Responsible party:
Piedmont Natural Gas
2d.Address
362.81 KB
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address tine 2
aty
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28210
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Elizabeth Lemons, PE
3b. Business Name:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3c.Address
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address tine 2
aty
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28210
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Joey Lawler, PWS
4b. Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
2016 Ayrsley Town Blvd., Suite 2-A
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Cde
28210
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Agent Authorization Form Line 5 HDD.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
it apprcpr ate)
N/A
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Raeford
2. Project Identification
State / Ravine / Rion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Slate/Fr vine/I'llegion
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Rmince / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
190.26KB

2a. Property Identification Number:
1 - 494830101008 : 2 - 794830101037
2c. Project Address
Street Address
S of Pittman Grove Church Rd and N of Arabia Rd
Address tine 2
CKY
Raeford
Postal / Zip Cade
28376
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Rockfish Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040607
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
- 4.6 acres
State / Province / I?gion
NC
(buntry
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
PNG is planning to relocate a damaged segment of the Line 5 natural gas transmission pipeline. The segment of gas line that will be replaced is located north of Arabia Road and south
of Pittman Grove Church Road in Hoke County, North Carolina. The project area consists of PNG's eAsting 50-foot wide permanently maintained easement and an adjacent forested
wetland area. The wetlands consist of periodically inundated riverine swamp forest that abuts the run of Rockfish Creek.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
2- Topo.pdf
987.57KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
3- Soils.pdf 802.89KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
- 0.5 acre
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
- 100
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to replace a damaged segment of the Line 5 natural gas transmission pipeline.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
To install the new pipe, an HDD rig will be staged on the south side of the swamp. Temporary workspace will be established in higher ground to accommodate the rig and stage the pipe.
Ground disturbance from minor grading, leveling of workspace and establishment of staging and stockpile areas should be limited to higher ground areas in this area.
The HDD rig will begin drilling a pilot hole north to the new easement area established adjacent to the eAsting easement. Different drill heads will then be used to widen the pilot hole to
a diameter sufficient to accommodate the new pipe. Specialized fluid will be pumped into and circulated through the hole in order to prevent its collapse prior to pipe insertion. The pipe
that will be used for the new line will be staged and strung in the existing easement in the northern portion of the project area. The pipe segments will be welded together and inspected
for structural integrity, and then will be pulled through the hole drilled by the HDD rig. Once the pipe is pulled through, both ends will be welded to the existing pipe, and the old segment
of pipe will be retired. An Inadvertent Return (IR) contingency Plan is included with the information submitted online.
Vegetation removal within the new easement Will require that mechanized timbering equipment work in the wetland area. Equipment wall work on 16-foot wide equipment mats staged
along the eastern edge of the existing easement, and timber wall be hauled from the wetland and properly disposed of at a permitted landfill. Areas within the proposed permanently
maintained corridor that will be cleared of aboveground woody vegetation will be maintained in an herbaceous state. Additional temporary workspaces to be cleared will be seeded and
allowed to naturally re -vegetate. Appropriate erosion and sediment control practices outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning
and Design Manual" and approved by the local governing authority will be installed to help prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features as a result of the work. Placement of some
sediment and erosion control measures may be required in the wetland area during logging operations, but wall not exceed the footprint of the permitted disturbance limits.
Project -vide, approximately 0.22 acre of forested wetlands will be permanently converted to herbaceous wetlands, and an additional 0.20 acre will be temporarily impacted for
equipment access. The wetland impacts associated with the proposed project will result first from clearing and temporary placement of timber equipment mats and targeted stump
removal, if necessary, to provide a level work surface and prevent extensive rutting. Following clearing, the new easement will be permanently maintained. Impacts to Rockfish Creek are
not anticipated, as logging equipment will either avoid the stream by working within the adjacent area from the north and south or construct of a temporary equipment bridge that will
span the active channel.
Following construction, temporarily disturbed wetlands within the easement will be restored to their original grades and contours and seeded with a native wetland seed mix. There
should be no loss of waters, as only conversion and temporary ground disturbance from equipment access and logging operations will be required.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.

Easement E)diibit.pdf 856.23KB
HDD Plan and Profile Drawings.pdf 7.41 MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Joey Lawler, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Data Forms.pdf 237.39KB
Precip Data.pdf 95.05KB
6. Future Project Plans
r Unknown
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used,
to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
N/A
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
u
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands F Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters F Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (') 2c. Type of W.* 2d. W. name * 2e. Forested* �21`.Typeof 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
1
Permanent Easement
P
Riverine Swamp Forest
WA
Yes
Both
0.220
(acres)
Temp Workspace JT
ff-Riverine Swamp Forest
�WA
Both
0.200
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.200
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.420
2h. Comments:
See cover letter for additional details
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.220
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts will be minimized by PNG's use of HDD to install the new pipe, with exit and entry points sited in high ground.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:

Impacts will be further minimized by use of appropriate sediment and erosion control measures during construction, and restoration of temporarily -
affected areas following completion of the work. Additionally, construction equipment operating within wetlands will be limited to that necessary for
clearing and restoration activities.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR 9 Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linearfeet)
0
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
0
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.22
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
4h. Comments
Mitigation for conversion impacts generally required at 1:1 ratio.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Project is not located in a watershed subject to riparian buffer rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r- Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
NVA
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
U
u
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No

3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is designed only to replace a damaged segment of eating pipe.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
C Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
See attached cover letter
Consultation Documentation Upload
iPac.pdf 212.68KB
NCNHP.pdf 1.221VIB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes f• No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
hftps://www. fish eries. noaa. gov/resou rce/ma p/esse ntia I -fish -habitat -ma ppe r
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation office GIS database indicated that there are no sites eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places within 0.5-mile of the site.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project will comply with applicable local floodplain regulations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/
Miscellaneous

Comments
See cover letter for additional information.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
1- Vicinity.pdf 588.42KB
4 - Aerial.pdf 1.41 MB
Cover Lefter.pdf 190.76KB
r—
Signature U
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
.bey Lawler
Signature
.7-00YL A-LE{L
Date
11/12/2020

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Elizabeth Lemons
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
"N QUAM`1111�/
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 22, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/22/2021
Project: PNG Line 5 HDD — Rockfish Creek County: Hoke
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.22
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Joey Lawler, agent
Sincerely,
Aa�dA�1�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CARo ND_EQ��
oeparlment of Environmental Duali
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date: 9/4/2020
Pro ect information
S&ME Project Name: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 5 Repairs
Type of Project: Priority Repair Activities
Location: Multiple Eastern NC Locations
Property Uwner/Kep intormation
Owner Name: Piedmont Natural Gas
Mailing Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive
City, State, Zip Code: Charlotte, NC 28210
Telephone No. 704.731.4479
Contact: Elizabeth Lemons P.E. - Project Manager II
Aaent Intormation
Business Name: S&ME, Inc.
Street Address: 9751 Southern Pine Blvd
City, State, Zip: Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone No. 704.523.4726
Contact: Joey Lawler, PWS / Walter Cole, LSS / Ashley Bentz, PWS
Authorization: I, Elizabeth Lemons , hereby authorize S&ME, Inc. to
submit information to and coordinate with the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and/or the NC Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) and other
relevant Federal/State/Local agencies pursuant to obtaining necessary
environmental permits for the project referenced above. If applicable, this also
authorizes the USACE/NCDEQ to access the proposed easement for the
purposes of conducting site assessment/confirming the accuracy of delineated
boundaries, provided that prior notification is given.
Signature: u4izaWh Lpewoht
S&ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / p 704.523.4726 f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

0
N
N
Pa
N
N
O
N
N -
Y
o -
�'LSIIL 1 i*i1 4
LL I
� BROOKERUN ��� f �R
W Legend
EASEMENT -PERMANENT
L — - -� EASEMENT -TEMPORARY
STREETS
0 500 1,000 C BaB : Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
s
N (FEET) C GdB : Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
REFERENCE:
a GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ERSI AND COUNTY SOURCES. THIS MAP IS FOR C JT : Johnston loam
z INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE
APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED LaB : Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes
OTHERWISE. WETLANDS AREAS WERE PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED AND LOCATION
APPROXIMATED. Pa Pactolus loamy sand
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
HOKE COUNTY SOILS EXHIBIT 1 " = 500 '
DATE:
I I LINE 5 SECTION 1 EMERGENCY HDD 7-21-2020
ROCKFISH CREEK PROJECT NUMBER
HOKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 7335-20-104

.*
ilk
lip
or,
Ok
Al
0.20 ACRE ► '
TEMPORARY IMPACT
r (MAT PLACEMENT)
0.22 ACRE
' PERMANANT �'•
CONVERSION
" IMPACT
• ram'/ �t ��• 4'I r -�•`.
O `
LZ
v 4 _
,- ARABIA RD
N 1
l I
EXISTING EASEMENT
o---� EASEMENT -TEMPORARY
t — — • NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT
0 300 600 ® TIMBER MATS
s
N (FEET) STREAM
BROOKE RUN
v REFERENCE:
a GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ERSI AND COUNTY SOURCES. THIS MAP IS FOR WETLAND CONVERSION
z INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE
APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED WETLAND
OTHERWISE. WETLANDS AREAS WERE PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED AND LOCATION
APPROXIMATED. — — STREETS
0
SCALE: FIGURE NO.
IMPACT EXHIBIT 1 " = 300 '
DATE:
III S LINE 5 SECTION 1 EMERGENCY HDD 7-21-2020 4
ROCKFISH CREEK PROJECT NUMBER
HOKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 7335-20-104

AREA TABLE
EXHIBIT A
THIS MAP MAY NOT BE A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT
BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS AND HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH RECORDING REQUIREMENTS FOR PLATS.
EASEMENT TYPE
ACRES
SQ. FT.
PERMANENT
0.274
11,926
TCE:::::
N/A
N/A
USSE
N/A
N/A
PERM ACCESS
N/A
N/A
SCALE1200'
: " =
++++++TEMP ACCESS++++
N/A
N/A
iiiii
200 100 0 200
SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE (SURVEYED)
ADJOINER BOUNDARY LINE (NOT SURVEYED)
— — RIGHT-OF-WAY
— — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENT
. TREE LINE
❑ ❑ FENCE (TYPE AS NOTED)
DB
PB
PG
RAN
•
O
0
DEED BOOK
PLAT BOOK
PAGE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
COMPUTED POINT
IRON PIPE SET
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
WETLANDS
PERMANENT
EASEMENT
PIN 794830101037 /
ROBERT M. SINEATH
PATRICIA SINEATH
DB 453 PG 540 /
PIN 494830101004
JANE H. SANDROCK
DB 192 PG 385
-iST/N
NqT� S� A
Al q��ONT
NOTES
1. SUBJECT PROPERTY SURVEYED AND MAPPED FOR: DUKE
ENERGY/PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS.
2. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION METHOD.
3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND IN U.S. SURVEY FEET
4. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO ANY VALID & ENFORCEABLE
EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, & RIGHTS OF WAY.
5. SURVEY IS BASED ON PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND EXISTING
MONUMENTATION FOUND DURING THIS SURVEY.
6. NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON
GPS OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING NCGS' NETWORK RTK SYSTEM
AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAD 83(NSRS 2011) DATUM.
COMBINED FACTOR 0.999885615. IF SHOWN, VERTICAL POSITIONS
ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 (GEOID 12A).
RLS
SURVEYING & CONSULTING
REGIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM LICENSE NO. C-1362
JOB NUMBER 1901 52
PIN 794830101038
BRANDON K. WALKER
CARISSA M. WALKER
DB 956 PG 703
CERTIFICATION
0
p" =
AN GR co
CHUB HRD OvE LL
0
SITE _� of
o \
o
U
2
U
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)
MN
`561363\\
46o
005-HOKE-010 000
PIN 494830101008
EDITH JACKSON FITZGERALD
DB 299 PG 790
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
N66°53'20"E
8.23'
L2
N19°02'20"E
112.56'
L3
N22°39'25"E
55.65'
L4
N25°53'39"E
46.92'
L5
N30o23'52"E
110.42'
L6
N32°42'03"E
337.74'
L7
S31°57'14"W
56.62'
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
CONVEYANCE OR SALES
I, JEFFERY S. SMITH, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK 299, PAGE 790); THAT THE
BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN BOOK 299,
PAGE 790; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1: 24,325; AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA 12 N.C.A.C. 56.1600; PURSUANT TO
G.S. 47-30 (F)(11)(C)(4) THIS SURVEY IS OF A PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR A PUBLIC UTILITY AS DEFINED IN G.S.
2L AND MEETS THE ATTACHMENT RULES OF G.S. 47-30 (M)(1); THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IS FOR RIGHT
OF WAY OR EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE
PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON.
JEFFERY S. SMITH, PLS L-4464
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC
EASEMENT EXHIBIT
EASEMENT ACROSS THE LAND OF
EDITH JACKSON FITZGERALD
7336 PITTMAN GROVE CHURCH ROAD
REVISION DATES MCLAUCHLIN TOWNSHIP, HOKE COUNTY, NC
DATE: 10/21/2020 SITE #:
DRAWN BY: JSS DEED: 299-790
PROJ. # : 0232679 TRACT # : 005-HOKE-010 000 LSC MAP #
DUKE
E N E RGY.
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
SUBSIDIARY OF DUKE ENERGY
550S.TRYON STREET CHARLOTTE,
N.C. 28202 TELEPHONE NO.
[phone] 1 OF 1

kv
1 �4 01
a cnir­ , - \4.
..ram '� !�• * ^ J
HDD POINT t; - =�.� -7. "J
saral, r.
STA: 4+16.22 % . rp, ,.{. ' `_,:a+► �M 'o
o``'-". �o RIG SIDE i,r:, °
° ENTRY ANGLE 14.0'
N: 436,409.4092 *�
a¢�r oe.3o o E: 1,980,774.7970
+00
-1+-- 2+ 3 ------------------ --
HDD POINT
S ,I STA: 13+44.28
I 1 •� •, , , , , , , , , , , , , , PIPE SIDE
_---- --moo- - ~ EXIT ANGLE 8.0'
N:437,227.0351
E: 1,981,213.8678
T
p �
FP�pO FP1 0 a
A$m 'Q
Q
tr
LJ
r I A
1. ALL REFERENCES HEREIN TO "OWNER" SHALL REFER TO PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY.
2. ALL CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE
CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS OF PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NCDOT), AND NORTH CAROLINA
RAILROAD, AS APPLICABLE.
3. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA TITLE 29 OF THE CODE OF
FEDERAL REGULATIONS. CHAPTER 1 (29 CFR 1926), "OCCUPATION".
4. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY
FOR JOBSITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS
PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THIS
REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL
WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD
HARMLESS THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL
OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS
PROJECT, EXCEPT FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE
OWNER OR THE ENGINEER.
5. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES INDICATED HEREON ARE BASED UPON
FIELD SURVEYS AND AVAILABLE INFORMATION OF RECORD AND MAY NOT BE
ALL-INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE PRECAUTIONARY
MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN HEREON AND ANY OTHER
EXISTING LINES NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE
RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING UTILITIES IF NECESSARY AND AGREES TO
BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM HIS
FAILURE TO LOCATE AND PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. BEFORE
STARTING WORK CONTACT NC ONE CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 OR CALL 811
TO ARRANGE FOR UTILITIES LOCATION.
6. LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO BE MET OR
CROSSED BY THE WORK SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY FIELD MEASUREMENT
SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF CONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT REVISIONS TO THE
DRAWINGS IF REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES AND/OR PENALTIES
RESULTING FROM ALL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
PERMITS AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS.
8. ALL DRAINAGE PIPES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AND
ERODED MATERIALS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION. THESE PIPES AND
STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED CLEAN DURING THE PERIOD OF
CONSTRUCTION.
9. ALL DISTURBED SLOPES SHALL BE RESTORED TO EXISTING GRADES AND
STABILIZED WITH SEED AND TACK IF APPROPRIATE WITH IN 90 DAYS.
GEOTECHNICAL DATA
I
INSTALLATION
VARIATIONS IN PLAN OR PROFILE
14+
X,.O
A* S
•O1 OQ
D\ \
4.
r
DRILLING FLUIDS
i No
1�
A/T TM'�N
cR
SITE O F
V
N 34' 57' 01 " ctiRa
W 79' 03' 49"
ARABIA RD
0
w
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
16.
THE CONTRACTOR, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE DRAWINGS, WILL
24.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT USE ANY DRILLING FLUID THAT DOES NOT
1.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT WITHIN +/- 2 FEET OF
DETERMINE THE EXACT METHOD AND TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLETING THE HDD
COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL
THE ALIGNMENT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE VERTICAL SHALL BE WITHIN +/- 2 FEET
CROSSINGS. EXCAVATED MUD PITS CONSTRUCTED IN THE ENTRY AND EXIT AREAS
REGULATIONS.
ABOVE AND +/- 10 FEET BELOW.
WILL BE LIMITED TO THE TEMPORARY WORK AREAS ONLY.
25.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING, TRANSPORTING,
2.
CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE THE MINIMUM COVER AND SHALL NOT BE
17.
AFTER COMPLETION OF THE DIRECTIONAL DRILLING WORK, THE ENTRY AND EXIT
AND STORING ANY WATER REQUIRED FOR DRILLING FLUIDS.
REDUCED. THE CONTRACTOR MAY DRILL DEEPER WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER
PIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS.
AND THE ENGINEER.
26.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAXIMIZE RECIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID
SURFACE RETURNS.
3.
THE GAS MAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) FEET OF
REAMING REQUIREMENTS
CLEARANCE TO ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES UNLESS SHOWN
27.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOLIDS CONTROL AND FLUID CLEANING
OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. WHERE THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE APPROPRIATE PROTECTION
18.
AFTER THE PILOT HOLE IS ACCEPTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM A
EQUIPMENT OF A CONFIGURATION AND CAPACITY THAT CAN PROCESS
SHALL BE INSTALLED.
REAMING AND PRODUCT PIPE PULL.
SURFACE RETURNS AND PRODUCE DRILLING FLUID SUITABLE FOR
REUSE.
19.
THE MAXIMUM REAMING SHALL BE 1.5 TIMES THE PRODUCT PIPE O.D. UNLESS
PILOT HOLE REQUIREMENTS
STATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS, OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
28.
DISPOSAL OF EXCESS DRILLING FLUIDS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL
4.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INSTRUMENTATION
20.
BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, RIGHT OF WAY AND WORKSPACE
WHICH WILL ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PILOT HOLE, MEASURE DRILL STRING AXIAL AND
CONTRACTOR. ANY BUOYANCY MODIFICATION PROCEDURE PROPOSED FOR USE
AGREEMENTS, AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
TORSION LOADS, AND MEASURE DRILLING FLUID DISCHARGE RATE AND PRESSURE. PILOT
SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. THE PULLBACK
HOLE TRACKING SHALL BE DONE USING THE WIRE LINE METHOD.
CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON NON -BALLASTED INSTALLATION. THE CONTRACTOR
29.
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT DRILLING FLUID DISPOSAL PROCEDURES
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO THE PULL SECTION RESULTING FROM
TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.
5.
THE OWNER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE INSTRUMENTS AND THEIR READINGS AT ALL
BUOYANCY MODIFICATIONS.
TIMES.
30.
CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY BEST EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN FULL
ANNULAR CIRCULATION OF DRILLING FLUID.
6.
THE CONTRACTOR, WHEN REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, WILL PROVIDE INSPECTION
PULLBACK
REQUIREMENTS
HOLES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO VISUALLY VERIFY THE LOCATION AND CONDITION OF
31.
DRILLING FLUID RETURNS AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THE ENTRY AND
THE DRILLED PIPELINE.
21.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PULL EXTRA LENGTH OF PRODUCT PIPE SUCH THAT ONE
EXIT PITS SHALL BE MINIMIZED.
7.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLOT THE ACTUAL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF
WELD JOINT CAN BE EXAMINED.
32.
IN THE EVENT THAT ANNULAR CIRCULATION IS LOST CONTRACTOR
THE PILOT BORE ON THE DRAWINGS AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 20 FEET. THIS
22.
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPORT THE PRODUCT PIPE PULL SECTION AS IT PROCEEDS
SHALL TAKE ACTION TO RESTORE CIRCULATION.
"AS -BUILT" PLAN AND PROFILE SHALL BE UPDATED AS THE PILOT BORE IS ADVANCED.
DURING PULLBACK SO THAT IT MOVES FREELY AND IS NOT OVER STRESSED.
33.
IF INADVERTENT SURFACE RETURNS OF DRILLING FLUIDS OCCUR,
8.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRANT THE OWNER ACCESS TO ALL DATA READOUT
23.
SEE HDD DESIGN INFORMATION CHART ON HDD SHEETS FOR DRILL SPECIFIC
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTAIN AND COLLECT.
PERTAINING TO THE POSITION AND INCLINATION OF THE BOREHEAD. WHEN REQUESTED,
INFORMATION.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS OF HIS POSITION MONITORING AND
34.
CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF DRILLING FLUIDS AND CUTTINGS AT AN
STEERING EQUIPMENT.
OFFSITE LOCATION. DISPOSAL SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE
9.
THE ACTUAL PILOT HOLE EXIT POINT SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN TWO (2) FEET LATERALLY
DISPOSAL SITE SHALL BE COVERED UNDER AN ACTIVE SEDIMENTATION
OF THE EXIT POINT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. LONGITUDINALLY THE ACTUAL EXIT
AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT ISSUED BY THE NCDENR - LAND
POINT SHALL BE NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) FEET SHORT OR FIVE (5) FEET PAST THE EXIT
QUALITY SECTION, OR BY A DELEGATED LOCAL EROSION CONTROL
POINT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
PROGRAM, IF THE DISPOSAL SITE IS NOT PERMITTED, THE CONTRACTOR
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING A SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL
��ON MUST C
TILITY PR O
UtFoR,y�
10.
THE OWNER SHALL APPROVE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE PILOT BORE BEFORE THE REAMING
PLAN PREPARED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL, AND FOR SECURING A
aSCOVNOFLv
T�o,�o�y
PHASE OR PIPE PULLING MAY COMMENCE.
PERMIT FROM THE NCDENR -LAND QUALITY SECTION.
vo��G�
11.
IF THE PILOT BORE FAILS TO CONFORM TO THE ABOVE TOLERANCES, OWNER MAY, AT HIS
PRODUCT PIPE MATERIALS
•
OPTION, REQUIRE A NEW PILOT BORE TO BE MADE.
35.
PRODUCT PIPE SHALL BE 12" NOMINAL (12.750" O.D. X 0.375" W.T.)
12.
IN ALL CASES, RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICTIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LISTED
CARBON STEEL, API 5L, ERW, GRADE X-52 WITH FBE AND POWERCRETE
,
TOLERANCES.
DD COATINGS.
n
N 1. GEOTECHNICAL DATA IS PROVIDED FOR CONTRACTOR REFERENCE AND WAS 13. NO PILOT HOLE WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT WILL RESULT IN ANY OF THE PIPELINE BEING HYDROSTATIC TESTING
TAKEN FROM A REPORT PREPARED BY S&ME. TITLED PNG LINE 5 - BIG MARSH INSTALLED IN VIOLATION OF RIGHT OF WAY RESTRICTIONS.
SWAMP HDD CROSSING, ROBESON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. S&ME PROJECT #
1558-20-049, DATED SEPTEMBER 18, 2020. 36. HYDROSTATIC TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
14. CONCERN FOR ADJACENT UTILITIES AND/OR STRUCTURES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPRESENTS SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT THE SOIL OVER THE LISTED TOLERANCES. LISTING OF TOLERANCES DOES NOT RELIEVE
BORING LOCATIONS. CONDITIONS MAY VARY BETWEEN THE SOIL BORING CONTRACTOR FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFE OPERATIONS OR DAMAGE TO ADJACENT
LOCATIONS. UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES.
CS
3. INTERPRETATION OF THE EFFECTS THAT SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS MAY HAVE ON 15. ALL BEND RADII SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THOSE LISTED IN THE
DRILLING IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. DRAWINGS.
0
o NCBEES CERT. NO.: C-1347 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
w
RO,,,,PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
z•
�;'-'!�'•,� NO. DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION BY CHK APPD DESCRIPTION APPROVALS
IN = A 10/13/2020 ISSUED FOR 30% REVIEW DKJ JNT JNT AREA CODE 1843 DATE SIGNATURE INITIALS REGIONAL LINE 5 -SECTION 1 - H DD'S
N019MR B 11 /05/2020 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW DKJ JNT JNT ACCOUNT NUMBER 10700 ENGINEER
i DATE SIGNATURE INITIALS ��DUKE Piedmont HDD 3 OVERALL PLAN
( �`�` PROJECT NUMBER 0232679 MGR TECH
j'�.,'�Fq� o`, DRAWING BY DKJ REC & STD ENERGY:: Natural Gas
LUMBER BRIDGE, NC
,#if I st",,, STATION ID DATE SIGNATURE INITIALS PRINCIPAL
z PROFESSIONAL ENG/ARCHSTAMP HECKER INITIALS JNT 10/12/2020 JNT/ ENGINEER COPYRIGHT 2018 Fayetteville Resource Center, Fayetteville North Carolina
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 811 N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
STIMMEL ASSOCLATES P.A.
601 N. TRADE STREET. SUITE 200
WINSTON-SALEM, NC. 27101 338.723.1087
STIMMEL PROJECT # 20-222
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 11 OF 20 DWG SCALE 1" = 100'
DWG DATE 09/01/2020 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-023-0001504 B
DISCIPLINE / RESOURCE CENTER / LINE NUMBER

NCBEES CERT. NO.: C-1347
RINGS
NO19PtIR
wo
111111,
1111111
PROFESSIONAL ENG/ARCHSTAMP
b
150
140
130
120
110
100
70
60
—0+50
u
cn
0
o� L
PIN 792
ROBERT
PATRIC
D B 4'.
CD
�C14
—O
Cco
_ t—
aw
CO
= Lu
LU
'- Cf)
I
PROFILE SCALE:
HORIZ: 1 "=40'
VERT: 1 "=10'
0
O
O
}
0
0
m
m
+
EXISTING GRADE
0
c
G
G
EXISTING 12" GAS NAIN
G
FROM AS -BUILT S
RVEY
0+00 0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50
150
140
130
120
110
100
0
70
60
4+00
LEGEND SHEET:
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001508 FOR LEGENDS.
GENERAL NOTES:
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001509 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
WETLANDS / STREAM / CAMA / BUFFER NOTES
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001509 FOR GENERAL NOTES.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001509 FOR EROSION CONTROL
NOTES.
GRADING NOTES:
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001509 FOR GRADING NOTES.
MAINTENANCE PLAN:
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001510 FOR EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
NOTES.
SEEDING SCHEDULE:
SEE SHEET PNG-C-023-0001510 FOR SEEDING SCHEDULE.
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
1. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING ONSITE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR,
CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, MAT OVER GAS MAIN AND FORCEMAIN, SILT
FENCE, FIBER FILTRATION TUBE, AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DEVICES.
PROVIDE A SELF -INSPECTION AT THIS POINT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN -
INSPECTED BY:
3. CLEAR AND GRUB AS NEEDED AND GRADE SITE HAND CUT ONLY WITH -IN WETLANDS.
4. INSTALL PIPING PER NORTHSTAR ENERGY PLANS.
5. FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT IN CULTIVATED FIELDS.
6. FERTILIZE, SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN THE SPRAY FIELDS.
7. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONLY AFTER APPROVAL IS OBTAINED
FROM THE PING INSPECTOR.
S. REMOVE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
FLOODPLAIN NOTE:
SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA ROBESON COUNTY COMMUNITY NUMBER 370397,
PANEL NUMBER 9460. MAP NUMBER 3710946000K MAPS REVISED 10/17/06.
DISTURBED AREAS:
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 8.90 ACRES
NOTE:
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL 40 0 40
DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 90 CALENDAR DAYS.
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
NO. DATE REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
A 10/13/20201 ISSUED FOR 30% REVIEW
B 11/05/2020 1 ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW
BY CHK JAPPID DESCRIPTION
DKJ JNT JNT AREA CODE 1843
DKJ JNT JNT ACCOUNT NUMBER 10700
PROJECT NUMBER 0232679
DRAWING BY DKJ
STATION ID
CHECKER INITIALS JNT
APPROVALS
DATE SIGNATURE / INITIALS
REGIONAL
ENGINEER
DATE SIGNATURE / INITIALS MGR TECH
REC & STD
DATE SIGNATURE / INITIALS
10/12/2020 JNT / PRINCIPAL
ENGINEER
DUKE I Piedmont
ENERGY Natural Gas
r61
COPYRIGHT 2018
LINE 5 - SECTION 1 - HDD'S
H D D 3- PLAN AND PROFILE 0-50 - 4+00
LUMBER BRIDGE, NC
Fayetteville Resource Centery, Fayetteville, North Carolina
EC REFERENCE NOTES:
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (2' OFFSET TO THE OUTSIDE
FOR CLARITY)
LIMITS OF CLEARING (3' OFFSET TO THE INSIDE FOR
CLARITY)
STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL 1
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (2' OFFSET TO THE INSIDE
FOR CLARITY) SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET SEE DETAIL 4
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET WITH J-HOOK SEE
DETAIL 5 SHEET C-023-0001511
FIBER FILTRATION TUBE CHECK DAM SEE DETAIL 6
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT FENCE SEE DETAIL 7
SHEET C-023-0001511
FIBER FILTRATION TUBE (2' OFFSET INSIDE FOR
CLARITY) SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET C-023-0001512
10 COMMERCIALLY MADE COMPOSITE MATS SEE DETAIL
3 SHEET C-023-0001512
11 SC-150BN MATTING SEE DETAILS 2, 3, AND 5 SHEET
C-023-0001513
SURVEY REFERENCE NOTES:
1O EXISTING TREELINE
2O EXISTING GAS MAIN
3O EXISTING WETLANDS LINE
4O EXISTING UTILITY POLE
5O EXISTING FENCE
6O TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
7O EXISTING MOUNTAIRE FORCEMAIN
$O EXISTING MONITORING WELL
SOIL BORING LEGEND
TOPSOIL
SP. POORLY -GRADED SAND
SW, WELL -GRADED SAND
SC, CLAYEY SAND
SP/SM, POORLY GRADED SAND
WITH SILT
CL, LOW PLASTICITY CLAY
SP/SC, POORLY -GRADED SAND
WITH CLAY
ML, LOW PLASTICITY SILT
SM, SILTY SAND
CL, HIGH PLASTICITY CLAY
SW/SC, WELL -GRADED SAND
WITH CLAY
Water @ 24 HOURS
J�[N N = Standard Penetration Test
Resistance Value (Blows Per Foot)
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES P.A.
601 N. TRADE STREET, SUITE 200
WINSTON—SALEM, NC, 27101 338.723.1067
STIMMEL PROJECT # 20-222
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 12 OF 20 DWG SCALE N/A
DWG DATE 09/01/2020 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-023-0001505 B
DISCIPLINE / RESOURCE CENTER / LINE NUMBER

0
pROPERTY I-IN
f
f
PIN 794830101037
ROBERT M. SINEATH
PATRICIA SINEATH
DB 453 PG 540
0
LL
CV
0=
CV 4
17—-
LU
U) t
w-
w
cn .
150
140
130
120
110
100
.s
-1
70
60
4+00
NCBEES CERT. NO.: C-1347
:VRINh. 1 7
N019rtR
-o w
PROFESSIONAL ENG/ARCHSTAMP
r
w
HDD
POINT
PROFILE HORIZ: V=40'E
STA:
+ 16.22
p
VERT: 1 "=10'
RIG S
DE
J
ENTRY
ANGLE: 14'
W
O
o
J
O
o
O
}
W
W
o
LO
Mo
z
m
o
LO
/
o
Q
Z
6
W
:5
�
Co
N
+
00
ZO
Z
O+
n
00
O
O
Z
+
o
N
L`
bi
5
N
O
STA: 13+4
G
p
M
0)
O
O
+
PIPE SIDE
+
\m
Cn
±
N
EXIT ANGLE
28
+
EXISTING GRADEcq
•
c
69
—
-
C'
G 11111110•
G
4
,l-
2
G
G
G
G
G
G
HORIZ. LENGTH:
6.78'
EXISTING 12"
GAS MAIN FROM AS-B
IL
SURVEY
:;:;ti;
�
H
RIZ. LENGTH: 151.
2'
SLOPE LENGTH:
9.13'
S
OPE LENGTH: 155.
3'
21
11
M
O M
m M
61
PVC STA: 4+93.00
ELEV: 111.66
,4
0
SAG BEN
14'
/
PVT ST
:.
+92.15
50/4"
\
ELEV: 1
9
23
21
16
21
RADIUS OF CURVA
URE: 1,200.00'
ARC LENGTH:
0.31'
RA
IUS OF CURVATUR
: 1,200.00'
19
ARG
LENGTH:249.93'
12
PVT STA: 7
83.30
19
HORIZ. LENGTH:
159.13'
ELEV: 76.01
SAG BEND: 12'
20
TOTAL
HDD 934 LF
31
51
4+50 5+00
5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 1 1 +00 1 1 +50 12+00 +50
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
ICD
CV
� O
I—
W
w
�C/)
Lu
Lu
150
140
130
�.28
12'
120
110
100
.o
-1
70
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
60 40 0 40
13+00 13+50 14+00
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
NO.
DATE
REVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
BY
I CHK
APPD
I DESCRIPTION
APPROVALS
DUKE Piedmont
ENERGY. Natural Gas
COPYRIGHT 2018
LINE 5 - SECTION 1 - H DD'S
HDD 3 -PLAN AND PROFILE 4+00 - 14+00
LUMBER BRIDGE, NC
Fayetteville Resource Centery, Fayetteville, North Carolina
A
10/13/2020
ISSUED FOR 30% REVIEW
DKJ
JNT
JNT
AREA CODE
1843
DATE
SIGNATURE INITIALS
REGIONAL
ENGINEER
B
11 /05/2020
ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW
DKJ
JNT
JNT
ACCOUNT NUMBER
10700
PROJECT NUMBER
0232679
DATE
SIGNATURE INITIALS
MGR TECH
REC & STD
DRAWING BY
DKJ
STATION ID
DATE
10/12/2020
SIGNATURE / INITIALS
JNT /
PRINCIPAL
ENGINEER
CHECKER INITIALS
JNT
EC REFERENCE NOTES:
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (2' OFFSET TO THE OUTSIDE
FOR CLARITY)
LIMITS OF CLEARING (3' OFFSET TO THE INSIDE FOR
CLARITY)
STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL 1
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (2' OFFSET TO THE INSIDE
FOR CLARITY) SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET SEE DETAIL 4
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET WITH J-HOOK SEE
DETAIL 5 SHEET C-023-0001511
FIBER FILTRATION TUBE CHECK DAM SEE DETAIL 6
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT FENCE SEE DETAIL 7
SHEET C-023-0001511
FIBER FILTRATION TUBE (2' OFFSET INSIDE FOR
CLARITY) SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET C-023-0001512
10 COMMERCIALLY MADE COMPOSITE MATS SEE DETAIL
3 SHEET C-023-0001512
11 SC-150BN MATTING SEE DETAILS 2, 3, AND 5 SHEET
C-023-0001513
SURVEY REFERENCE NOTES:
1O EXISTING TREELINE
2O EXISTING GAS MAIN
3O EXISTING WETLANDS LINE
4O EXISTING UTILITY POLE
5O EXISTING FENCE
6O TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
7O EXISTING MOUNTAIRE FORCEMAIN
$O EXISTING MONITORING WELL
SOIL
BORING LEGEND
TOPSOIL
SP, POORLY -GRADED SAND
SW, WELL -GRADED SAND
SC, CLAYEY SAND
SP/SM, POORLY GRADED SAND
WITH SILT
CL, LOW PLASTICITY CLAY
SP/SC, POORLY -GRADED SAND
WITH CLAY
ML, LOW PLASTICITY SILT
SM, SILTY SAND
CL, HIGH PLASTICITY CLAY
SW/SC, WELL -GRADED SAND
WITH CLAY
Water @ 24 HOURS
J�[N
N = Standard Penetration Test
Resistance Value (Blows Per Foot)
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES P.A.
601 N. TRADE STREET, SUITE 200
WINSTON—SALEM, NC, 27101 338.723.1067
STIMMEL PROJECT # 20-222
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 13 OF 20 1 DWG SCALE N/A
DWG DATE 09/01/2020 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-023-0001506 B
DISCIPLINE / RESOURCE CENTER / LINE NUMBER

NCBEES CERT. NO.: C-1347
:VRINh. 1 7
N01'rtR
wo
PROFESSIONAL ENG/ARCHSTAMP
c
C"
IL
C
F-
w
w
U)
w
w
U)
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
O
80
14+00
PROFILE SCALE:
HORIZ: 1 "=40'
VERT: 1 "=10'
PIPE
STRINGING
EXISTING GRADE
/
G
G
G
G
EXISTING 12" GAE
MAIN FROM AS -BUILT
c
SURVE
14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
0
80
20+00
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
40 0 40
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING * USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095) * DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE * TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSER ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
NO. DATE IREVISION(S) DESCRIPTION
A 10/13/20201 ISSUED FOR 30% REVIEW
B 111/05/20201ISSUED FOR 90% REVIEW
BY CHK JAPPID DESCRIPTION
DKJ JNT JNT AREA CODE 1843
DKJ JNT JNT ACCOUNT NUMBER 10700
PROJECT NUMBER 0232679
DRAWING BY DKJ
STATION ID
CHECKER INITIALS I JNT
APPROVALS
TURE / INITIALS
10/12/2020 1 JNT /
REGIONAL
ENGINEER
MGR TECH !� DUKEr6111
Piedmont
REC & STD ENERGY Natural Gas
PRINCIPAL I -
ENGINEER COPYRIGHT 2018
LINE 5 - SECTION 1 - HDD'S
H D D 3 - PLAN AND PROFILE 14+00 - 20+00
LUMBER BRIDGE, NC
Fayetteville Resource Centery, Fayetteville, North Carolina
EC REFERENCE NOTES:
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (2' OFFSET TO THE OUTSIDE
FOR CLARITY)
LIMITS OF CLEARING (3' OFFSET TO THE INSIDE FOR
CLARITY)
STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL 1
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE (2' OFFSET TO THE INSIDE
FOR CLARITY) SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET SEE DETAIL 4
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE OUTLET WITH J-HOOK SEE
DETAIL 5 SHEET C-023-0001511
FIBER FILTRATION TUBE CHECK DAM SEE DETAIL 6
SHEET C-023-0001511
TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT FENCE SEE DETAIL 7
SHEET C-023-0001511
FIBER FILTRATION TUBE (2' OFFSET INSIDE FOR
CLARITY) SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET C-023-0001512
10 COMMERCIALLY MADE COMPOSITE MATS SEE DETAIL
3 SHEET C-023-0001512
11 SC-150BN MATTING SEE DETAILS 2, 3, AND 5 SHEET
C-023-0001513
SURVEY REFERENCE NOTES:
1O EXISTING TREELINE
2O EXISTING GAS MAIN
3O EXISTING WETLANDS LINE
4O EXISTING UTILITY POLE
5O EXISTING FENCE
6O TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
7O EXISTING MOUNTAIRE FORCEMAIN
$O EXISTING MONITORING WELL
SOIL BORING LEGEND
TOPSOIL
SP. POORLY -GRADED SAND
SW, WELL -GRADED SAND
SC, CLAYEY SAND
SP/SM, POORLY GRADED SAND
WITH SILT
CL, LOW PLASTICITY CLAY
SP/SC, POORLY -GRADED SAND
WITH CLAY
ML, LOW PLASTICITY SILT
SM, SILTY SAND
CL, HIGH PLASTICITY CLAY
SW/SC, WELL -GRADED SAND
WITH CLAY
Z Water @ 24 HOURS
J�[N N = Standard Penetration Test
Resistance Value (Blows Per Foot)
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES P.A.
601 N. TRADE STREET, SUITE 200
WINSTON—SALEM, NC, 27101 338.723.1067
STIMMEL PROJECT # 20-222
REF. DWG(S)
SHEET(S) 14 OF 20 1 DWG SCALE N/A
DWG DATE 09/01/2020 SUPERSEDED
DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
PNG-C-023-0001506 B
DISCIPLINE / RESOURCE CENTER / LINE NUMBER

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Line 5 Section 1 HDD - Rockfish Creek City/County: Hoke Sampling Date: 01-Oct-20
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): J. Lawler, PWS Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 1.0 % / 0.6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat.: 34.9510510 Long.:-79.0630090 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: 3onston Mucky Loam - Cumulic Humaquepts NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No O
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O' No O
Yes * No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No O
within a Wetland?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
• Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
0 Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑d Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑d FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
W Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No O
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes No O
Depth (inches): 6
Yes O No O
Saturation Present?
Yes 0 No O
Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology
Present?
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Based on Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range, prior period is nromal.
Remarks:
Taken near edge of maintained ROW and adjacent forested area.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
c., A.. 7
Sampling Point: WA
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
. Acer rubrum
25❑
50.00ro
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7 (A)
2. Nyssa biflora
20
d❑ 40.00ro
OBL
3. Pinus taeda
5
❑ 10.00ro
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
8 (B)
4.
0
❑ 0.0°ro
5.
0
❑ 0.00%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
87.5% (A/B)
6
0
0.0%
7.
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
o
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of Total Cover: 25 20% of Total Cover: 10
50
= Total Cover
091L species 66 x 1 = 66
Sapling or Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 72 x 2 = 144
1.
0
❑
o.0%
FAC species 57 x 3 = 171
2.
0
❑
0.o%
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3.
0
❑
0.0°%
IDPL species 0 x 5= 0
4.
0
❑
0.0°ro
Column Totals: 195 (A) 381 (B)
5.
5.
o
El
0.0%
o.o
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.954
o
El
0.0
7.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
0 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
d❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
1. Acer rubrum
10
❑
28.6%
-FAC _
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2 Nyssa sylvatica
10
0
28.60ro
FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
❑
14.30ro
FAC
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
0
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
10
z8.6°ro
5.
0
❑
o.o°ro
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.00ro
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of Total Cover: 17.5 20%ofTotal Cover: 7
35
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
Arundinaria gigantea
50
❑
42.4%
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2. saururus cernuus
20
d❑
16.9%
OBL
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3. Carex squarrosa
20
d❑
16.9%
FACW
4. Isolepis cernua
10
❑
8.5%
OBL
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
5. Murdannia keisak
10
❑
8.5%
OBL
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
6. Woodwardia areolata
4
❑
3.4%
OBL
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7. Osmunda cinnamomea
2
❑
1.7%
FACW
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8. Xyris jupicai
2
❑
1.7%
OBL
9.
0
❑
0.0%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10.
0
0.0%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
o.o%
3 ft (1 m) in height.
12.
0
❑
o.o°ro
50% of Total Cover: 59 20% of Total Cover: 23.6
118
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
. Toxicodendron radicans 2 ❑ 100.0% FAC
2.
0
❑
0.0%
3.
0
❑
0.0%
4.
0
❑
0.0%
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
50% of Total Cover: 1 20% of Total Cover: 0.4
2
= Total Cover
Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is dominant.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) 0/0Color (moist) 0/0TVDe 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 5/6 02 C PL Loam
6-12 10YR 2/1 100 Sandy Loam
1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑d Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (Flo) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑d Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Soil appears hydric.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No O
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Line 5 Section 1 HDD - Rockfish Creek City/County: Hoke Sampling Date: 01-Oct-20
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: WA -UP
Investigator(s): J. Lawler, PWS Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Shoulder-NRCS Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 0.0 % / 0.0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat.: 34.9510510 Long.:-79.0630090 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Blaney Sand - Arenic Hapludults NWI classification:
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes O No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ❑'
Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
within a Wetland?
Remarks:
Taken in easement at high ground area north of WA
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches): 0
Yes ❑ No O
Saturation Present?
Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present?
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Based on Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range, prior period is nromal.
Remarks:
Evidence of hydrology not observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five/Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
c., A.. 7
Sampling Point: WA -UP
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
. Pinus taeda
25
d❑
62.5%
FAC
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 (A)
2. Quercus alba
10
d❑
25.0%
FACU
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
[:112.5%
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
6 (B)
4.
0
❑
0.0%
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
50.0% (A/B)
6
0
0.0%
7.
i's
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
0
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply
by:
50% of Total Cover:
20 20% of Total Cover: 8
40
= Total Cover
091L species 0 x 1 =
0
Sapling or Sapling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species 25 x 2 =
50
1.
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 49 x 3 =
147
2.
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 60 x 4 =
240
3.
0
❑
0.0%
UPL species 25 x 5 =
125
4.
0
❑
0.0%
Column Totals: 159 (A)
562 (e)
5.
5.
o
El
0.0%
o.o
0
El
0.0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.535
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. 0 ❑ 0.0%
8.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover:
0 20% of Total Cover: 0
0
= Total Cover
❑ 2 - D Tes t - 50o/
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
Pinus taeda
2 Baccharis angustifolia
3. Diospyros virginiana
4. Rubus allegheniensis
5.
6.
50% of Total Cover: 15 20% of Total Cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1 . Eupatorium capillifolium
2. Heterotheca subaxillaris
3. Agalinis heterophylla
4. Bidens bidentoides
5. Solidago canadensis
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of Total Cover: 42.5 20% of Total Cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
. Gelsemium sempervirens
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
50% of Total Cover: 2 20% of Total Cover: 0.8
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is not dominant.
10
10
5
5
0
0
30
25
20
15
15
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
85
o
�/❑ 29.4% FACU
�/❑ 23.5% UPL
❑ 17.6% FACU
❑ 17.6% FACW
❑ 11.8% FACU
❑ 0.0%
❑ 0.0%
❑ 0.0%
❑ 0.0%
❑ 0.0%
❑ 0.0%
❑ 0.0%
= Total Cover
2 ❑
50.0% FAC
2 ❑
50.00% FAC
0 ❑
0.0%
0 ❑
_
0.0% _
0 ❑
0.0%
4 = Total Cover
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ No
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA _ UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) 0/0Color (moist) 0/0TVDe 1 Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/2 100 Fine Sand
6-12 10YR 5/4 100 Sand
1Type: C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (Flo) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR O, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Soil is not hydric.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No OO
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
10
8
N
6
4
2
0
2020-08-02
T$
M"p
/ 2020-09-01
i
2020-10-01
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30-Year Normal Range
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
Coordinates
34.95005,-79.06348
Observation Date
2020-10-01
Elevation (ft)
124.52
Drought Index (PDSI)
Moderate wetness (2020-09)
WebWIMP HZO Balance
Wet Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
•
Writ -Len by Jason deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301h °/pile (in)
7011 %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2020-10-01
2.556299
6.823622
5.720473
Normal
2
3
6
2020-09-01
3.780315
6.434252
6.748032
Wet
3
2
6
2020-08-02
3.597244
6.404331
4.838583
Normal
2
1
2
Result
Normal Conditions - 14
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days (Normal)
Days (Antecedent)
FAYETTEVILLE (PWC)
35.0583,-78.8583
96.129
13.812
28.391
6.608
11157
83
RAEFORD 9.6 E
34.9592,-79.0558
207.021
0.767
82.501
0.409
55
7
LUMBER BRIDGE 4.0 N
34.9466,-79.0807
192.913
1.004
68.393
0.52
1
0
PARKTON 3.6 N
34.9541,-79.0199
125.0
2.484
0.48
1.119
1
0
FAYETTEVILLE 9.9 SW
34.9729,-79.0308
193.898
2.432
69.378
1.263
7
0
RAEFORD
34.9869,-79.2189
250.0
9.161
125.48
5.272
131
0
RED SPRINGS 1 SE
34.8122,-79.1622
180.118
11.047
55.598
5.585
1
0

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0023
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034
Project Name: 7335-20-104
October 05, 2020
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

10/05/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratory birds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

10/05/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

10/05/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

10/05/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0023
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034
Project Name: 7335-20-104
Project Type: TRANSMISSION LINE
Project Description: Rockfish Creek
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/34.9505830128135N79.06318009278004W
.4rat�,, Rj
Counties: Hoke, NC

10/05/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
Insects
NAME STATUS
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly Neonympha mitchellii francisci Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5419

10/05/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-00034 4
Flowering Plants
NAM L_ STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECTAREA UNDER THIS OFF ICE'S
JURISDICTION.

■ ■■■ Roy Cooper. Governor
00 0 NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■L■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
IN won Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-13001
October 5. 2020
Joey Lawler
S&ME
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 29273
RE. 7335-20-104, Dig 6 - Rockfish Creek
Dear Joey Lawler.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
& OFC g19.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
7335-20-104
Project No. Dig 6 - Rockfish Creek
October 5, 2020
NCNHDE-13001
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Element Accuracy
Federal State
Global
State
Group
I
rObserv7ation
Occurrence
Status Status
Rank
Rank
M
Rank i
i
Butterfly 34472
Neonympha areolatus
Georgia Satyr
1980-Pre
H 5-Very
--- Significantly
G3G4
S2
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or 33769
Somatochlora
Coppery Emerald
2004-Pre
H? 5-Very
--- Significantly
G3G4
S2?
Damselfly
georgiana
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or 33789
Triacanthagyna trifida
Phantom Darner
2004-Pre
H? 5-Very
--- Significantly
G5
S1?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Natural 28033
Nonriverine Swamp
---
2010
B 2-High
--- ---
G2?
S2
Community
Forest (Sweetgum
Subtype)
Natural 28030
Wet Pine Flatwoods
---
2010
C 2-High
--- ---
G2?
S1
Community
(Sand Myrtle Subtype)
Natural Areas Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Representational Rating
collective Rating
Rockfish Creek Ravines
R3 (High)
C5 (General)
Camp Rockfish Natural Area
R2 (Very High)
C3 (High)
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on October 5, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

St",
I he ku
d
eR
21! fi
N 1,
W+E
S
October 5, 2020
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
E] NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
NCNHDE-13001: 7335-20-104
Buar H01 Rd
c
ID ter Creek
f5
Ovurttin R:y
209 R.
F rheFe ra Or
S } p
4
� x
(;amde11RA
r+, nr.,nch
Hill�re�f. i
Greek FWId Ur
tune W°If Rd / Grannys to
=Wr
,B/rdsong or U
D.W. ere
SdutMork Rd
slp,.awa n
1:24,026
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 3 of 3

Contact Name*
Joey Lawler
Contact Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Owner*
Piedmont Natural Gas
Project Name*
Line 5 Section 1 HDD - Rock Fish Creek
Project County*
Hoke
Owner Address:*
Street Address
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Region
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
28273
USA
Is this a transportation project?*
C Yes c: No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F- 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F Individual Permit F Modification
F- Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes (: No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Chad Turlington
Please give a brief project description below.*
Piedmont Natural Gas needs to replace a damaged segment of 12-inch
diameter Line 5 natural gas pipeline with a new segment that will be
installed by horizontal directional drill (HDD), partially within a new 30-foot
wide easement adjacent to their e)asting 50-foot wide easement.
This site is located north of Arabia Road and south of Pittman Grove
Church Road in Hoke County. Appro)amately 730 linear feet of the e)asting
pipe is proposed for replacement by HDD. This segment of Line 5 is
located beneath Rock Fish Creek and its adjacent riparian wetlands.
Mechanized land clearing of forested wetlands will likely be required.
The project may require pre -construction written approval under
Nationwide Permit No. 12 and General Water Quality Certfication No. 4133.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.

10/30/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Line 5 Section 1 HDD - Rockfish Creek.pdf 288.57KB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
, Y LA4"I�
Submittal Date 10/8/2020