090023_Inspection_20200805

ivision of Water Resources ( 1 t'Y , TV tO
Facility Number ( - 2_3 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: m Lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: S J 4.'(o 9-U�Arrival Time:I O(2 2 4 1 Departure Time:17 47`, I" County: 13( ocAl evt Region: th-y
Farm Name: 17 - 14 c!S9G6p f A Cl'i */ Owner Email:
Owner Name: g- 4 .S r 55 k Ip _St,v t µ-C- �c/A(_ ;4(. Phone:
Mailing Address: U ( 0 mac t4 ]fit I 1 (0
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Guw4-1'S [61- CG/C Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 4_ Integrator: Pr^'G5-{-49 C-
Certified Operator: Sa-wk. l-j tr-ct q q Certification Number: e. 1 15 t{Z
Back-up Operator: 1U fLcJ U 111$ C 11 Certification Number: Z(E 0
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
_Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow _
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
_
•Feeder to Finish S(LI 5lyO Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
_Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Cat aci Po•. — Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish IIIIEMIIII-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder_
Boars II Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other II Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts /
I I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes DSO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No aICIA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No al< ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 5IP& Z DZO
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? D Yes 3.Fr❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2-3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes latNir ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 1:3,N6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ia 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. D Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): L s 0 e
13. Soil Type(s): -NO
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Id-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Evio ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents �
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Iio ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I:6o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: / - 7_,'T (Date of Inspection:S' {,, ZO
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 172' -To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes IE No El NA El NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
O Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes lay ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes LE'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ['To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes Ij3<slo 0 NA ❑ NE
O Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑' lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes IIPICio 0 NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
c c.,U b ,60-t I— g--ici sew uoe y I2 — /- I Ct St i F, q , 3 (fez
�J
mu,,,i iC tedetk kalq I tcE( C 0 c.P
0
cst,(( v ct[o --306-- (8 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Q L'I C) vvtt9 16 Phone: elf('— 4 33,-,33 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ ^ L') Ctivlfill9 Date: S 4,4 Reap
Page 3 of 3 2/4/Z01 S