20100491 Ver 1_Application_20100628

??N vU??
4/0 D
A?
All Planning documents have been completed including the Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Form
NWP 3
Bridge: B-5214 Pitt #37
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal: Section 404(F)(I)(b) Exempt Activities-Maintenance of Transportation Structures.
Action ID Number SAW-2005-10677
State: Activities Deemed to Comply with Water Quality Standards.
Local: None
Or 10 04 Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3 - Maintenance
91
Action ID Number SAW-2005-10677
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687
Local: None
Project Description
Replace existing 52'-5" long by 28' (clear roadway) wide concrete deck bridge with timber piles with a
proposed 122.53' long by 33' (clear roadway) wide reinforced concrete bridge on steel piles. Age of the
bridge and safety inspection reports dictate the need for replacement of this bridge. There will be no
impacts to jurisdictional waters during bridge construction and guardrail installation. The longer bridge will
result in approximately 3,201 square feet of excavated roadway fill beneath the new structure. This project
does not involve Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act) navigable waters. This project does not require the
completion of a formal PCN but notification to the Corps is being provided to be included in their database.
This conveyance is shown on the Gardnerville USGS Quad Map and Sheet Number 69-A of the Soil
Survey of Pitt County. Fork Swamp is classified as C;Sw;NSW and is in the Middle Neuse 03020202
RUC. The channel is 40 feet wide from bank top to bank top and drains a woodland/agricultural area. No
federally protected species or historic resources are found immediately adjacent to this location.
In order to ensure compliance with best management practices, all attached General and Regional
Conditions associated with Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality Certification #3687 must be followed.
Keep demolition and construction debris out of the stream. Riprap will not be placed below the
plane of ordinary high water for stabilization. Excavation should be confined to the right of way,
and limited to the minimum amount required to excavate in high ground for the construction of the
new bridge. All excavated material should be removed from the site, placed on existing spoil piles, or
disposed of in farm fields. Any waste material disposed of off-site shall have a reclamation plan.
All Erosion and Sedimentation measures and Maintenance Best Management Practices should be
implemented. I am forwarding a copy to Mr. Andy Blankenship in Roadside Environmental for his perusal
in E&S inspections. The project supervisor should always have this permit package, including the attached
General and Regional Conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 3 and Water Quality Certification
#3687 on site during the bridge replacement. The project supervisor should notify me immediately if any
questions or concerns should arise before and during construction.
Jay B. Johnson
Division 2 Environmental Officer
[phone]
?2 9?G
r-i-i
olii? ?
4T 'N<??7
n. _
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification C Form
A. A ticant Information
1. Processing
Ia . Type(s) of approval sough from the
Corps:
® ;action 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b . Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 3 or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d . Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express N Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes N No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes Z No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes N No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes N No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes S No
2. Project Information

2a.
Name of project: B-5214, Pitt 37 Bridge To Bridge Replacement SR 1724, Emma
Fork Swamp
WBS Element Number 42811. 1.1 Cannon Road Over
2b. County: Pitt
2c. Nearest municipality /town: Ayden
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. DCN only, nly, T.I.P. or state
project no: 37019 B-5214
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.: %
252-830-3341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page. 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): B-5214 Pitt 37 SR 1724, Emma Cannon Road Over Fork
Swamp

1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: N 35.440222 Longitude: - W
77.355077
(DD.DDDODD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: NIA acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Fork Swamp, a Tributary of Swift Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C;Sw;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1724, Emma Cannon Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate the
landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the
ro
ert
:
p
p
y
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Bridge Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 69'-5" Long Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 122-6" Cored Slab Bridge. Excavators,Dump
Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Bridge Replacement.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
? Preliminary ®Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: USACOE
Name (if known): Thomas Steffens and Jay B. Johnson Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
June 10,2010
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
hi
®Yes ? No ? Unkn
t
s project (including all prior phases) in the past? own
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Welland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. Ft.
2h. Comments: No 404 Wetland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary M (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 LF
3i. Comments: 0 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (d applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.

Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland

number (acres)
of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
511 Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitt abon, then you MUST fill out Section D of this forth.
6a.
® Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ®P ? T Fill Fork Swamp ® Nees 1084 Sq. Ft. 484 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Fork Swamp ® Nos 2060 Sq. Ft. 1311 Sq. Ft.
B3 ®P ? T Fill Fork Swamp ® El Yes
No
1191 Sq. Ft.
1715 Sq. Ft.
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary M
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4111 Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a ,protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this forth.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other: None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ®P ? T B4 Fill Fork Swamp ® Nos 1050 Sq. Ft. 323 Sq. Ft.
82 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts 5385 Sq. Ft. 3833 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments:
Page vbt 10
PCN Forth Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
u. Impact Jusvncation and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are No Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetland Impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent
feasible, with no impacts occurring on the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
projects ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres"
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ®No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact tiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) ;
;
; (square feet)
Zone 1 for
3
(2 Catawba)
Zone 2 15
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in4ieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Forth -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ®Yes ? No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and special Sediment control
Fence will be used to treat Stormwater Runoff from the road. Roadside ditches will
not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated ® Yes ? No
uplands before entering into the
buffers. There are no weep holes in the proposed bridge,thus eliminating
stormwater run-off from the proposed bridge deck.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b. Does this project require a Stonnwater Management Plan? M
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief,
descnptbonof
Sheet flow through Vegetated Uplands and spe
cial Sediment control Fence will be used to treat Stonmwater Runoff from
the road. Roadside ditches will not enter into the buffers; the roadside ditches will sheet flow through vegetated uplands
before entering into the buffers.There are no weep holes in the proposed bridge,thus eliminating stor mwater run-off from
the proposed bridge deck.

2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? Certified Local Government
? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
apply (check all that apply): ? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
El Other. N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply E] HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): E] Session Law 2006-246
® Other. NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ®No
6. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/stateAocal) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b . If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Welland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ®No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered Tres' to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no,' provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
h El Yes ®No
abitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
i
?
? Yes ® No
mpacts
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Determination was made by Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC, July 14, 2009
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ®Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Bridge designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson June 11, 2010
Applicant/Agents Printed Name Ap n g is Signature Date
(Agents signature is v I' on an oration letter from the applicant

Page 11 of 11
PCN Forth -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
i
i
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
REFERENCE NO. NAMES
1
2
ELIZABETH STOCKS NEWLIN, ET AL
FRANK M. KILPATRICK, JR.
ADDRESSES
1911 SPEIGHT FORREST DRIVE
TARBORO, NC 27886
US BAY VIEW BLVD
ATLANTIC BEACH, NC 28512
Pitt county Moving Ahmd Projmts
Subject: Pitt County Moving Ahead Projects
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:03:25 -0500
From: "Vanessa E. Patrick" <[e-mail]>
Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation
To: John Rouse <[e-mail]> ,
Michael Summers <[e-mail]>,
Jay Johnson <[e-mail]>
CC: Shane Petersen <[e-mail]> ,
"Jesse D. Zinn" <[e-mail]>
Hello All: Three Moving Ahead projects in Pitt County require federal permits and therefore
architectural survey. Last Wednesday (February 23) 1 investigated the three project areas
and determined that no properties listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places are impacted at any of the permit sites. The projects are therefore in compliance with
North Carolina General Statute 121-12(a) and Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act for historic architecture. They are:
MA02017R (SR 1203, Allen Road);
MA02008B (Bridge No. 37); and
MA02014B (Bridge No. 23).
By my reckoning one project in Greene County, MA02005R (NC 91), still needs investigation
in the field. Four others may also require architectural survey - can you confirm the permit
status for each of the following four projects?
MA02024R (NC 58, Carteret);
MA02021R (US 258, Jones);
MA02020R (US 258, Lenoir); and
MA02015R (NC 306, Pamlico).
Please let me know of any changes, additions, or deletions. Thanks! Vanessa
RE B-5214 Pitt 37.txt
From: Wilson, Travis w.
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 9:59 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Caldwell, Betty A; Rouse, John W; Hughes, John R
subject: RE: B-5214 Pitt 37
Let me know if you need any further information.
Travis
-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 10:39 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Caldwell, Betty A
subject: RE: Pitt 37 B-5214
I encountered problems with my email therefore i am resending this response:
WRC does not request a moratorium or have any specific concerns for the replacement
of Bridge number 37 in Pitt county.
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC Wildlife
Resources Commission
1142 1-85 Service Rd.
creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: [phone] ext. 6
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
-----original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:19 PM
To: Wilson, Travis w.
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Caldwell, Betty A
Subject: Pitt 37 B-5214
Hey Travis.... sorry about the typo on the first e-mail ...it should be Pitt 37, not
Pitt 35...thanks...mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records
Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:28 AM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
cc: Johnson, Jay B; Caldwell, Betty A; Rouse, John W; Hughes, John R
subject: B-5214 Pitt 37
Good Morning Mr. Travis..... Hope all is well with you and family.... Division 2 plans;.
to replace B-5214 Pitt 37, SR 1724,Emma cannon Road Over Fork swamp. we would like
to know if this is an anadromous fish location,and if so, the dates for the
moratorium.
Attached are maps for your use. Many Thanks ...mike
Page 1
B-5214
BRIDGE TO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OFPITT 37
SR 1724, EMMA CANNON ROAD OVER FORK SWAMP
GARDNERVILLE USGS QUAD MAP
SHEET NUMBER 69-A OF THE SOIL SURVEYOFPITT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4681 J WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 4281LLI
MAPNUMBER 3720468100 J
JANUARYI4, 2010
P17737
Y= 6192047311
X= 2489921.2305
N M'^-W-25"
W77 A -2148"
N 35.440222 DEGREES
W 77.355077DEGREES
0 6501,300 2,600 3,900 5,200
Feet
e I ? , 27
u- -4 -i1-t77IJ
B-5214
BRIDGE TO BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF PITT 37
SR 1724, EMMA CANNONROAD OVER FORBSWAMP y i I '" 4
GARDNERVILLE USGS QUAD MAP
SHEET NUMBER 69-A OF THE SOIL SURVEYOFPITT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4681 J WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 42811.
MAPNUMBER 3720468100 J JANUARYI4, 2010 -"
r r ?" i? - S
10
rn f /

1

,
\\` X03
c
i ?
('Ilr f ?.?
PITT37
Y= 6192ft 7311
X= 2489921.2305
N35^-26'--25"
W 77^-21'-18"
N 35.440222 DEGREES
W 77.355077 DEGREES

F--

\I rl9mj 1

X!20

v,.•--- x gas ??. _. , i'? 0 6501,300 2,600 3,900 5,200
k Feet
r Vii)
I
,!o
1
1-
170
1
' l ' w I,AS 11M I "
Ifl. 14
f2A11^H _? -- lyyy J)? t u O°
ll. . , .GSe4., ti B \
p I,M' I
0.
E 37-
Va6
17
jt4
1100 IW2 - ?Y,• / ^?' ,; / 1ySa ??\_ .°d !IN ,rq
1Y1 - I'
U
uai ?I(/ 1 _
T .' 1 ??.+. - • ,1?/ - \ \ ? = 400 1
Ilex IS u . 4/
1 - . la - 13 t _ sae's., n, ' '- • 1 1 / Im 1w
lla r w , - - `T111 Q7
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
'
VICINITY PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: B-541
MAPS REPLACE BRIDGE "37
ON SR 1744 OVER
(NOT TO SCALE) FORK SWAMP
SHEET OF 05/14/10
NORTH CAROLINA

? I
0
J ?
p? 1
I '

TOPO MAP
SCALE: 1" = 2000'
1 /
\N
I
I
C
1
1$ -
;loads
AC ?
21
i
NCDOT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PITT COUNTY
PROJECT: B-5214
REPLACE BRIDGE 037
ON SR 1721 OVER
FORK SWAMP
OF 0,
N
H
U
Q
n
H
W
LL
LL
m
Q
(-D w n
Z,c
co IU) =
OIW W
cr jz J
J
C7 J >
CD
Z W Q?
::) W
Q J Z
UmCD
Z Q ¢
<Y O
Q cn
W _
U a
Q z 0-
3: 0 c
ocnz?
= Y 3 0
cn?0- oQ
WWO==
H ZLL(n0
O
Z N
N N W
~ ~ N
d d n
F F ?
ri
'J N
w II
z w
O Z Z
N O O
w w ¢
W >
w w ¢
w w U
7 w
d] W
m

N (I1

H LL

U LL

N W
LL
cn LL
N
W
U
LL LU
LL Z Q

V

`"

Ln

Cl)

N")
-D Od co N n N Go
mNz d C
LY - cn LL
U) LL
cn LL LL
(f) LL
co
H
W
LL W U
L
Z Q
03
m
o
M
0'
@
LP
m
L
m 03
m C
m - CD
l9
- N --I Lfl
N m V J
W W W W
~ Q
0
c U) 0')
o cn
Z ?- LL
J U cn
Q
~ d 0
W
N
H
Z
W
m
QI
04
wa
N
H
H
Z
O N
? 2 IJi
"? o a
w x ?-
x w .
N Z pN
a
J WLL
9}I WO >O
a
O(C p ? N
ri w u o
o ¢w H px
Z ZZN
H O? 2 LL
a ra 3 wo
UO Wm O p ti
ZK N w
w zo o ww
? oLL a z w
x 3
W IJ-la i ? ??
¢ ¢m ~ 3 FN
o mo u tt w
m ¢x J i oa
x ¢z ti >?
U pa M O Jp
W U
J a N }
O rp O W W3
U 0p Z Mo
CC ¢ ? W¢
in Na > >o
w w? u a¢
z o w z
z zw r o mw
w ww o ow
p pN Z J LLN
Z,??j ?
00
N
Q
LL
N

7 O

__ a
F.
r
JIM
m
ti
° F
N

T N
LL
J
IN oN _
=az
o
NZ
?j .YW
Km
HJ
+a Nam a
F
z F
w
aim
ao
N3 c? oHti ?
y?JW
am LL
ti
2
W m
I m Q
U N
Z
HW J2
ZW IV
HV G
.oa ro
zaLL mm
I- a
rLL
3KJ +a
3 LL ZI
GU
m

z,
= J
O I
U
N
o H
F-
Z d
F-
u
W
0
U
Z
O
H
H
Q
In

M

10
NNC
Z3`W?

lO
W
N
XZ
J
12 a
u
I
I
r J

I.1
a,
1 .
a
3
I x
I I ? I
pp.
I N

I? x
I W I

I 1
I= J
Q o
I
W U

i Z0
d
1 I ;
l; Ze

c
I
I e

Y
u w
ol.
0 w U
~ 1
y

Q 1
LL 1 ?
A
a N
a ; LL VI
JN ^ ? ? I ? f]
X? I W N
N o
U
I I
> I I
I I
# I I I
I 1
I
1
/ I I 11
I I
I I 11
1 1
I I
I 1
_ 1 1
I I
1 1
1 N I
>1 W ? I
OI O O I
?1 lV ;
L I
=I N ? 1 1
m
? ml -j y?j Nl <
I eul
?NI
I Z I m
VVI
1
I I . W
K
LL
S
N
f
X
m
J
N
W
[C

Q
0
W?
9p?
4
//
0
?- Y II
I
1
I YI

N

O U I
to
M O

N
2

~
U O
H
K ~

CL v)
Z
W
z a w
W O Z
lL
J
W
3Nl
^Z
W4A
WZ
_ I-O
VV
J
~ ~Y~{L
Vo OCIL.
~0
_1
W< c
QO
31
? D
? 6 \
LL F
N \

Wf ??
' \
C<W

><O O
OJ U

mS LL
Pow
-?

I x¢ l
Wm drMS
?j

?
L ? p

I X<
H I
O I III
F
.
I 1 . T .
1
1 1

I 1
W 1
O
N I O

I I
t11
H
p I W
I F

f[
Z
I
1 I
L
f
O
Z f
J 1
N ? I
Z e ? i
Q ^ <
? f
J ? s
CL a i
N M 1
W l
w t
o <
a
QZLL
SFr
N
NmH
a?
2311. 3
W
6
F
Z?
O F
%r T
#
N Ifl
M Q
l
O f
3

2N
W
m
1
W
Q#
W

? m
N
N
I
1 M
1

i O
i 3
S
N

f I?il

n
Tl

I i
Z
1 G N
J
.
f i 1'1 N
J # F ? IL
?
I J
H r
?
y1 i r
YW W f
m [lO
OZ W
Z NJW
Am
?s
o
S 1
? 4?
\
I oz
I Z6 o
?
r
m