20010382 Ver 1_Mitigation Report_20100616

HABITAT
ASSESSMENT
RESTORATION
PROGRAM, INC
AND
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: 704-841-2841
Fax: [phone]
email: [e-mail]
www.habitatassessment.com
Employee Owned
Mr. Eric Kulz
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650
June 12, 2010
Subject: UT to Reedy Fork Creek Stream Restoration - Greensboro, NC - 2010 Monitoring Report
(NC-DWQ # 010382)
Dear Mr. Kulz,
Enclosed you will find the 2010 monitoring report for the above referenced project. We are scheduled to perform the
2010 macroinvertebrate monitoring in late summer 2010. We are working with Starmount to address the
recommendations listed on page 17 of the report.
If you have any questions or require further information please do not hesitate to contact me at 336.362.6776 or Dr.
Randy Forsythe at 704.321.5678.
Respectfully submitted, r- @
.JUN 16 2010
DEYR - VOTER OUALITY
WEXM AND STM4WAMR BRANCH
Kam Cecil Blackmon
President
Stream and Wetland Delineation and Restoration • Habitat Analysis Invasive Species Management
Threatened and Endangered Species Studies • Mitigation Monitoring 404/401 Water Quality Permitting
Stream Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring Report
Stream Mitigation Site
UT to Reedy Fork
Greensboro, NC
(NC-DWQ #010382)
May 2010
Prepared by:
HARP, Inc.
301 McCullough Dr., 4th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28262
Contact:
Ms. Karri Blackmon
Karrin.habitatassessment.com
704-841-2841
Table of Contents
Section 1. Site Background Information
A. Site Location
B. Summary of Stream Restoration
a. Restoration Goals and Objectives
b. Restoration Schedule
c. Monitoring Program
Section 2. Preconstruction macroinvertibrate data
Section 3. As-built Information
A. Planform Map with Cross Section & Photostation Locations
B. Photostation Photos
C. Cross Sections
D. Cross Section Tables
E. Longitudinal Profile
F. Longitudinal Profile Tables
G. Copy of Conservation Easement
H. Table of As Built Fluvial Morphologic Parameters
Section 4. Annual Monitoring Reports
A. Year 1 (2006) Monitoring Report
a. Photostation Photos
b. Cross Sections
c. Cross Section Tables
d. Longitudinal Profile
e. Longitudinal Profile Table
f. Plant Monitoring Data Tables
g. Macroinvertibrate Data - no data this monitoring cycle
h. Other Observations - no other observations this cycle
i. Summary & Recommendations
B. Year 3 (2008) Monitoring Report
a. Photostation Photos
b. Cross Sections
c. Cross Section Tables
d. Longitudinal Profile
Page
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
9
App. 3A.
App. 3B.
App. 3C.
App. 3D.
App. 3E.
App. 3F.
App. 3G.
P. 10
P. 11
P. 11.
App. 4A-a
App. 4A-b
App. 4A-c
App. 4A-d
App. 4A-e
App. 4A-f
p. 12
p. 13
App. 4B-a
App. 4B-b
App. 4B-c
App. 4B-d
p. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

e. Longitudinal Profile Table
f. Plant Monitoring Data Tables
g. Macroinvertibrate Data - reported under separate cover
h. Other Observations - photos of beaver and rv incusions
i. Summary and Recommendations
C. Year 5 (2010) Monitoring Report
a. Photostation Photos
b. Cross Sections
c. Cross Section Tables
d. Longitudinal Profile
e. Longitudinal Profile Table
f. Plant Monitoring Data Tables and Map of Plots
g. Macroinvertibrate Data - to be collected late summer 2010
h. Other Miscellaneous Observation Data
i. Summary and Recommendations
App. 4B-e
App. 4B-f
App. 4B-a
p. 14
p. 15
App. 4C-a
App. 4C-b
App. 4C-c
App. 4C-d
App. 4C-e
App. 4C-f
App. 4C-g
p. 16
p. 2
E @fOwm
Section 1. Site Background Information ,; U N 1 6 201.0
A. Site Location DER-WATERQJAUTY
WETIIWUS AND STORW A'.'F.R FMCH
This project is for mitigation of stream impacts being incurred on a mixed-use
development site referred to as the "Villages at Reedy Fork", northeast of Greensboro,
N.C. just east of the Eckerson Road exit on US Hwy 29. At this site approximately 1430
feet of a channelized tributary (Rosgen G-type) to Reedy Fork Creek (within the Haw
River Basin, USGS unit #03030002) was restored with new planform, dimension, profile,
and conservation buffers. Reedy Fork Creek, USGS HUC# 03030002, drains
approximately the northern 1 /2 of Guilford County within the North Carolina Piedmont
Province. In this area, Reedy Fork and its tributaries have a west to east drainage, before
entering the Haw River and trending southeast towards the N.C. coast. This area of the
Haw River drainage has been ranked by the EPA as high quality waters but with high
vunerability. The greater majority of reporting water quality sampling sites in the basin
show that the creeks within basin are performing for their designated uses. The
restoration recovered approximately 1800 linear feet of an E/C Rosgen-type stream.
Figure 1. shows the location of the restored reach and its contributing watershed.
B. Summary of Stream Mitigation/Restoration Activities
a. Restoration Goals. The restoration plan submitted in 2001 clearly documented
that the impaired reach had previously been channelized, and with the exception of a
narrow fringe of trees and shrubs along the banks, lacked a hardwood bottomland riparian
habitat within the majority of its adjacent 100 year floodplain. The goals of this
restoration are to recapture natural channel, aquatic habitat and riparian characteristics
along a 1430' long reach (1820 ft restored) of the un-named tributary to Reedy Fork that
is identified in Figure 1. The restoration is to restore pattern, dimension and profile to
natural North Carolina regime and reference reach conditions. Many areas of the
channelized reach were noted as unstable and eroding when surveyed in the fall of 2000
and spring of 2001. The restoration aims to stabilize channel banks, and restore aquatic
and riparian habitat. It includes a permanent easement for a 50 ft conservation buffer to
both sides of the stream (measured from the bankfull edge).
b. Restoration Schedule: The initial restoration plan was submitted in the
summer of 2001, and amended to meet comments in the fall of 2001. Weather and DOT
disturbances related to bridge work and road widenings forced the postponement of
project implementation for a 2-3 year period. The restoration plan was finally
implemented from late October of 2004 to late January of 2005. Documentation of as-
built conditions started in November of 2004 and was completed in January of 2005.
p. 3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TOPO! reap printed on 01!14/04 front "North -arohra.tpc" and ntitled rpg"
79145.000' 6V 9144.000' W 79o43,000' W
.t _ y _. ..
-
E:
n
z
0
O
T
O
M
Z'
O
Ih 'i
- I
O '
O
G

Ks i ?? vy.T?'••J • !? y x+5''.3 ff ' .a ?f
-?.,? r r r 't :?5 G
37
79'45.000' W 79144.000'_W 79'43.)00' W WGS84 79-42,000
MNTN 0 _ _?I?.9EE W
1111
-
P,mted(mm TOPGI 020M Net... Geogmphv H.W, {wiaw.topo.com?
Villages at Reedy Fork USGS 7.5 min. Topographic Map
HARP - --
Stream Mitigation Studyw/proposed Mitigation Site along Un-named January
Tributary to Reedy Fork 2004
Figure 1. Location of stream restoration/mitigation site, NE of Greensboro, UT to Reedy
Fork, Haw River Basin. Take Summit Road Exit off of Hwy. 29N to Eckerson Road,
First culvert crossing is upstream termination of the 1820' restoration reach.
p. 4
'NGS84 79°42.000' W
E ? ? I
c. Monitoring Protocol: The monitoring of the site is composed of 3
components: 1) physical stream morphology, 2) aquatic macroinvertibrate populations,
and 3) plant communities (banks and over-bank conservation buffer areas). The
monitoring occurs at various stages in the planning, implementation, and post
implementation phases of the work. First, prior to any field mitigation, engineering plans
were reviewed for consistency with the mitigation objectives set forth in the restoration
plan. Secondly, during the mitigation work, a schedule was established for field
verification to assure that the work was proceeding as planned and in a manner which
provided minimal disturbance, and maximum conservation of existing stream bed habitat.
Third, a performance-based monitoring program was initiated after the project was
completed, and which continues for 5 years.
Performance-based monitoring of the physical morphology of the stream is
composed of two aspects. The first is a visual qualitative program designed to detect and
anticipate potential areas of stream bank or bed failure. These are walk-throughs to check
bed, bank, and buffer areas for physical and biological integrity, and allow problems to
be detected and fixed in a timely manner. The second component is a quantitative
program of stream morphology assessments that document that the restoration is
achieving it's stated goals. Stream pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile data are to
be collected and compared over time to demonstrate the success of the stream mitigation
work. The quantitative assessments shall occur during the 1st, 3`a, and 5th year of the 5
year period following completion of the work. [Due to the need for one complete
growing season to adequately provide a basis for biotic monitoring, the first cycle of
monitoring was moved to the spring of 2006; but the first of the three required
cycles of macroinvertibrate to summer of 2007.1. Reports shall be submitted at the end
of each of the years of quantitative monitoring. The physical monitoring shall also
include documentation of bed grain size data, using the appropriate methodologies for
mean bed particle sizes (e.g. Pebble counts for beds that are gravel/cobble based, and
sieve analysis for sand and finer reaches).
The quantitative monitoring of the plant communities shall be done during the same
annual cycle as the physical monitoring (Ist, 3`a, and 5th years [Note: 1St year monitoring
cycle was move to 2006 for reasons noted above]). For bank areas, three bank
monitoring plots of 50 foot lengths shall be used to determine overall survivorship. For
the over-bank conservation easement, three monitoring plots running for 100' section
along the restoration shall be used to determine survivorship of the on a species by
species basis. Where appropriate, 'volunteer' data shall be included to accurately
represent the evolution and establishment of the bottomland floodplain plant community.
Macro invertibrate sampling will follow the direction of the INTERIM,
INTERNAL TECHNICAL GUIDE SUMMARY BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE
MONITORING PROTOCOLS FOR COMPENSATORY STREAM RESTORATION
PROJECTS dated 10 May, 2000.
• The monitoring plan will include data collected from one station above
and one station within the restoration reach. Data will be collected
within the relocated or restored channel during all subsequent surveys
p. 5
' Data collected prior to construction was included in the initial Stream
Restoration Report. Benthic macro invertebrate surveys will be
conducted for three years after restoration excluding the year
immediately following restoration. Benthic macro invertebrate
samples will be collected during the summer months (June-
September).
• Sample collection will follow protocols established by the Biolo
ical
g
Assessment Unit of the Division of Water Quality as found in the
Standard Operating Procedures for the Unit. The Qual-4 collection
' method will be used to collect samples from this stream.
• NC certified biological laboratories pursuant to administrative code 15
NCAC 2H.1100 shall conduct the identification of all benthic
macroinvertebrate samples.
• Data analysis and choice of metrics will be consistent with
rotocols
p
developed by the Biological Assessment Unit of the Division of Water
' Quality. These protocols are described in the Standard Operating
Procedures manual for the Unit.
' • Reports summarizing survey results will be submitted to the Division
of Water Qualit
/W
tl
d
U
i
i
y
e
an
s
n
t w
thin 60 days following survey
completion.
• An assessment of channel materials using pebble count information
will be conducted at each of the biological monitoring locations and
included in the report.
' [Initially it was stated that the first of the three annual cycles of macroinvertibrate
monitoring should not commence until the summer of 2007, and thus the 2°d and 3rd
macroinvertibrate monitoring events could occur during successive summers of '08
& '09; however drought in 2007 delay the start of the three year monitoring to the
late summer or early fall of 2008.

u

1

? ob

0

1

1

t
1
1
Section 2. Preconstruction Macroinvertibrate Data (collected in June of 2001; as
excerpted from original 404/401 mitigation plan of 7/23/01)
As part of the biological review for the Reedy Fork Stream Restoration and
Mitigation Project, Macroinvertebrate samples were collected from a reference reach
as well as an impaired reach. The reference reach is the same stream that will be used
to provide reference geomorphology parameters for the stream restoration design.
The impaired reach is the same reach that has been identified for restoration during
the project. The streams were sampled on June 26, 2001 by Chris Matthews (HDR)
and Jim Matthews (HARP).
The DWQ protocols for processing benthic macroinvertebrate samples are
discussed in the STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES manual (NCEHNR 1997)
and in the INTERIM, INTERNAL TECHNICAL GUIDE BENTHIC
MACROINVERTEBRATE MONITORING PROTOCOLS FOR COMPENSATORY
STREAM RESTORATION PROJECTS prepared by the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality 401/Wetlands Unit (NCEHNR 2001). Since these tributaries to Reedy
Fork are 2nd order streams, an approved collection method for smaller streams, known as
the Qual-4, was used.
Qual-4 collection methods are recommended for small streams, which have catchments
of one square mile, or less (lstand 2nd order streams). All taxa are collected and
identified, rather than just Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) taxa, during
this type of survey. The primary output for this sampling method is a taxa list with an
indication of relative abundance (Rare, Common, Abundant) for each taxon. The
calculation of metrics from a Qual-4 method is similar to those conducted for a standard
qualitative collection method. These metrics include total and EPT taxa richness, EPT
abundance and biotic index values. Currently, DWQ does not have classification criteria
for small streams, therefore applicants are not required to calculate bioclassification
ratings of these stream systems (NCENHR, 2001).
Benthic macroinvertebrate samples are collected and preserved in the field. It is
not necessary to know the total number of organisms from a specific habitat type when
qualitative or semi-qualitative samples are collected. Specimens are "picked" from the
sample and preserved in 95% ethanol. The Qual-4 collection method takes approximately
one hour per site. Field processing samples in this fashion minimizes laboratory
processing.
The following table and graphs show the taxa collected, as well as, metrics for
total and EPT taxa richness, EPT abundance and biotic index values.
Order Family/Species Feeder Tolerance Reference Impaired
type value
p. 7

1

E hemeroptera
Caenis spp. 3 7.41 Abundant
Stenonema spp. 3 Common Common
Potomanthus dist' 3 1.53 Common
Odonata
Dromogomphus spp. 5 5.92 Common Rare
Aeshna spp. 5 6.00 Rare
Trichoptera
Hydropsyche b 2 7.78 Abundant Abundant
Neophylax oligius 4 2.23 Abundant
Coleo tera
Celina spp. 5 8.04 Rare
Ectopria nervosa 4 4.16 Rare
Elmidae 4 Abundant Common
Di tera
Tipulidae 1 7.33 Rare Common
Chironomidae 3 9.63 Rare Abundant
T
Other
Pelec oda Corbicula fluminea 2 6.12 Rare Common
Gastro oda Pulmonate snails Common Common
Hirudinea Leech 5 5.00 Rare
Deca oda Crayfish 6 Abundant Abundant
Feeder types: 0=herbivore, 1=shredder, 2=filter feeder, 3=collector, 4=scraper,
5=predator, 6=omnivore, 7=deposit feeder
' Metrics

Metric Reference Reach Impaired Reach

Total Richness 13 - Fair 12 - Fair
EPT Taxa Richness 4 - Poor 3 - Poor
EPT Abundance 46% 37%
Biotic Index Value 5.97 = Good/Fair 7.37 = Fair
p. 8

1
1

1
1
1
1
1
Section 3. As-built Information
The as built information consists of the following listed components which have
been appended and labeled by report section number and subsection letter (e.g. Sec. 3,
Part A. The Planform Map..., is Appendix 3.A.):
A. The Planform Map showing Locations of Cross Sections & Photostations
Appendix 3.A.
B. Photos from Photostations
Appendix 3.13.
B. Plot of Cross Sections
Appendix 3.C.
D. Cross Section Tables
Appendix 3.1).
E. Plot of Longitudinal Profile
Appendix 3.E.
F. Longitudinal Profile Tables
Appendix 3.F.
G. Copy of final conservation easement
Appendix 3.G.
H. Table of As Built Fluvial Geomorphic Parameters
Table 1 shown on following page (page 9)
P. 9

1

Table 1. Stream Mornholoaie Parameters
Parameter Reference Reach Corrected
Reference
Reach(I) Impaired Reach As-Built Restored
Reacrt
Sinuosity (a) 1.313 1.1 1.3
Pool/Riffle Ratio 1.51 1.3
Average Pool Spacing (ft) 23 ft 27 ft 28 ft
Meander Wavelength (ft, b) 89 ft 160 ft 60 125 -165 ft
Avg. Meander Belt Width 43.87 ft 70 <50 70 ft
Bankfull Height (ft) 1.6 ft 2.24 ft 2.5 ft 2.24 ft
Bankfull width (ft, c) 12 ft 16.75 ft 14 ft 19 ft
Bankfull Area (sq ft) 15.9 sq ft 31 sq ft 31 sq ft 31 sq ft
Average Bankfull Depth (ft, d) 1.325 ft 1.85 ft 2.2 ft 1.85 ft
Flood Prone Width (ft,e) 40.6 ft 56 ft 19.9 ft >= 56 ft
Entrenchment Ratio (f) 3,38 1.42 3.38
Width/Depth Ratio 9.05 6.36 9.05
Predominant Stream Type (g) C/E 4/5 E/G 4/5 C/E 4/5
POOLS D50/D84 (h) 2,2 mm/1 1.6 mm .85mm/1.5mm .85mm/1.5mm
RIFFLES D50/D84 (h) 6.8 mm/1 3.1 mm 6.5mm/17mm 6.8mm/13.1 mm
POINT BAR D50/D84(h) .76 mm/4 mm NA .76 mm/4 mm
RIFFLE ARMOUR D50/D84(cm) 2,72cm/6cm 7cm/1 2cm 1 0cm/1 Scm
Valley Grade 0.01 0.0099 0.0099
Stream Grade 0.0077 0.009 0.0076
Riffle Grade 0.016 NA 0.016
Pool Grade <0.003 NA <.003
(a) sinuosity is the ration of the channel length over the valley length
(b) meander wavelength is the average separation of the channel inflection points
(c) bankfull width is measured at the height of'bankfull' or channel forming stage level
(d) average channel depth below the bankfull stage
(e) width of the channel at a height of 2x bankfull stage height
(f) ratio of the floodprone width to channel width
(g) stream class using Rosgen, D.L. A Classification of Natural Rivers, Catena, Vol. 22, 169-199, Elsevier Sci.,
B.V. Amsterdam
(h) 50% Finer by weight grain size (mm)
(1) parameters adjusted for differences in the impaired watershed size using NC Piedmont regime data and
observed impaired reach bankfull area.
these grain sizes distributions will be under adjustment for the first }ear following construction
p. 10
1
1

1

1

1

Section 4. Annual Monitoring Reports
A. Year 1 (2006) Monitoring Report
The as-built report was submitted in 2005 concluding construction of the
restoration work in this calendar year. The 2006 calendar year was then determined to be
the first monitoring cycle, which allowed sufficient time for a number of near-bankfull
events to occur, and all planted materials to become established through one complete
growing season (2005). As indicated in the above described monitoring protocol,
macroinvertibrate sampling was not included in the first yearly monitoring cycle, given
the need for a settling or adaptive period in stream bed conditions. This period also
involved riffle and meander pool adjustments, so grain size monitoring will also
commence in the next cycle. The first monitoring cycle included: photo documentation
from all benchmarked photostations, cross section surveys, a surveyed longitudinal
profile (bed and water surface), and a quantitative assessment of stream bank and buffer
vegetation. The photographs, survey data tables and plots, and plant data are appended
for this monitoring cycle in Appendix 4A as indicated below.
a. Photostation Photos
App. 4A-a
b. Cross Sections
App. 4A-b
c. Cross Section Tables
App. 4A-c
d. Longitudinal Profile
App. 4A-d
e. Longitudinal Profile Table
App. 4A-e
f. Plant Monitoring Data Tables
App. 4A-f
g. Macroinvertibrate data
no data this monitoring cycle
h. Other observations
no other observations this cycle
i. Summary & recommendations
The 2006 photographs, morphologic surveys, and vegetative survivorship
indicate that the restoration is meeting its morphologic, hydrologic, and ecological goals
p. 11
1
1
' and success criteria. The longitudinal profile shows that meander bend areas have
established pooling water areas with continuing adjustments as bed loads shift from storm
to storm. Stream bank and buffer vegetation is now well rooted and gains in bank
' vegetation height should bring increasing shade into the stream in the coming 2007
growing season.
' The 2007 annual cycle represents the 3rd growing season since completion of
construction. Following leaf-out in the spring a complete suite of quantitative monitoring
data will be collected and submitted to meet the 3rd year's monitoring requirements.
This ws to initially include both macroinvertibrate and sediment size data. In 2008, the
2°d of 3 years of macroinvertibrate data was to be collected and archived for inclusion
into the next monitoring report, or reported under separate cover. In 2010 (the 5t" year) a
t complete and final set of quantitative monitoring data is to be collected and submitted to
demonstrate the success of the restoration to close out the mitigation project (due in
January of 2011). This schedule is dependent on meeting success criteria.

1

1

p. 12
1
B. Year 3 (2008) Monitoring Report
The as-built report was submitted in 2005 concluding construction of the
restoration work in this calendar year. The 2006 calendar year was then determined to be
the first monitoring cycle, which allowed sufficient time for a number of near-bankfull
events to occur, and all planted materials to become established through one complete
growing season (2005). As indicated in the above described monitoring protocol,
macroinvertibrate sampling was not included in the first yearly monitoring cycle, given
the need for a settling or adaptive period in stream bed conditions. The late summer
August to early September period of 2007 was selected for starting the macroinvertibrate
sampling and first macroinvertibrate monitoring cycle. However, the field crew
discovered the creek had dried up during the 2007 drought. Over the winter of 07-08
flow recovered, and macro invertibrate sampling was re-attempted in the late summer of
08. An addendum to this report was filed independently with water quality, pebble count,
and the laboratory macroinvertibrate results. The year 3 data provided here includes:
photo documentation from all benchmarked photostations, cross section surveys, a
surveyed longitudinal profile (bed and water surface), and a quantitative assessment of
stream bank and buffer vegetation. The photographs, survey data tables and plots, and
plant data are appended for this monitoring cycle in Appendix 4B as indicated below.
a. Photostation Photos
App. 4B-a
b. Cross Sections
App. 4B-b
c. Cross Section Tables
App. 4B-c
d. Longitudinal Profile
App. 4B-d
e. Longitudinal Profile Table
App. 4B-e
f. Plant Monitoring Data Tables
App. 4B-f
g. Macroinvertibrate data
no data this monitoring cycle
h. Other observations
Additional photos of beaver activity and some rv incursions
i. Summary & recommendations
The 2008 photographs, morphologic surveys, and vegetative survivorship
indicate that the restoration is meeting its morphologic, hydrologic, and ecological goals
p. 13

and success criteria. The longitudinal profile shows that meander bend areas have
established pooling water areas with continuing adjustments as bed loads shift from storm
to storm. Pools have continued to deepen and create under bank fish habitat on outer
' meander bends, and inner meander bends and some inflection areas have build lateral
berms at bankfull stage. Comparisons of the 2008 and 2006 longitudinal profiles indicate
that a stable riffle and pool structure is now established in the reach. Vegetation show the
' same original survivorships as indicated in the year 1 vegetative assessments (66%) but
with very high and increasing numbers of native woody volunteers. The live stakes on
' creek banks have had good survivorship. Woody vegetation planted and volunteered into
the buffer at this tract has had to compete with grasses during a period of prolonged
drought and has thus not seen the extent of growth noted on some of our other prior
' projects. While survivorship is good at this site, it may take a few more years for the
trees to become better established at the site.
' The lowermost 50 feet of the restored stream has had repeated attempts by
beaver to impound the creek by construction of a low head dam (see appended photos:
413-h). The dam was breached prior to the collection of this year's monitoring data and
' thus does not reflect any impacts from in the water or sediment profile. Continued beaver
activity in this area may result in the loss of the lower 50 feet of the stream from the
restored portions of the stream.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
During the collection of the year 3 monitoring data in May of 2008 tracks of at
least one all terrain vehicle (ATV) was noted in the conservation buffer, and one ATV
driven by two gentlemen from the City of Greensboro Water Resources was encountered.
Several damaged tree were noted along the ATV trail (see appended photos: 413-a). It
was recommended that signage be used to discourage ATV incursion into the
conservation easement as it is prohibited under the easement agreement.
Beginning the late summer of 2008 and continuing for 3 years, macroinvertibrate
data will need to be collected to meet the 3 consecutive years of macroinvertibrate
sampling requirement included in the monitoring plan. This work should also include
sediment grain size pebble counts in the sampling areas at each at each sampling cycle.
An addendum to this report should be filed once the first sampling has been completed,
and then subsequent 2009 and 2010 sampling data will be reported with the final 2010
monitoring report.
The last cycle of morphologic monitoring will occur in summer of 2010 and the
last macroinvertibrate monitoring will occur in August or September of 2010. A final
monitoring report will thus be submitted for the restoration project in the fall of 2010,
depending on when macroinvertibrate data is returned from the certified laboratory.
p. 14

' C. Year 5 (2010) Monitoring Report
The as-built report was submitted in 2005 concluding construction of the
' restoration work in this calendar year. The 2006 calendar year was then determined to be
the first monitoring cycle, which allowed sufficient time for a number of near-bankfull
events to occur, and all planted materials to become established through one complete
' growing season (2005). As indicated in the monitoring protocol described above,
macroinvertibrate sampling was not included in the first yearly monitoring cycle, given
the need for a settling or adaptive period in stream bed conditions. The late summer
period of 2007 was initially selected for starting the macroinvertibrate sampling.
However, the creek had dried up during the 2007 drought forcing the sampling to be
' delayed to 2008. In the late summer of 2008, and then again in the late summer of 2009,
macroinvertibrate sampling was completed and reported under separate cover. The last
of the required three successive years of macroinvertibrate sampling is scheduled to occur
this coming September of 2010. The data will be transmitted under separate cover once
' the results are returned from the subcontracted laboratory. This is expected to completed
by January of 2011. This year 5 monitoring report includes: photo documentation from
all benchmarked photostations, cross section surveys, a surveyed longitudinal profile (bed
and water surface), and a quantitative assessment of stream bank and buffer vegetation.
The photographs, survey data tables and plots, and plant data are appended for this
monitoring cycle in Appendix 4B as indicated below.
a. Photostation Photos
App. 5B-a
b. Cross Sections
' App. 5B-b
c. Cross Section Tables
' App. 5B-c
d. Longitudinal Profile
App. 5B-d
e. Longitudinal Profile Table
' App. 5B-e
f. Plant Monitoring Data Tables
App. 5B-f
g. Macroinvertibrate data
no data this monitoring cycle
h. Other observations
' Additional photos of beaver, insect, and flooding impacts
i. Summary & recommendations
p. 15
' The 2010 photographs, morphologic surveys, and vegetative survivorship
indicate that the restoration is meeting most, but not all of its morphologic, hydrologic,
and ecological goals and success criteria. Short comings that have arisen since the year 3
monitoring event are persistent back water impacts on lower end of the stream's water
profile from beaver activity, die back of riparian shrubs due to a combination of factors
discussed further below, and flood displacement of rock armor placed over the upstream
plug of the abandoned channel.
' The longitudinal profile shows that meander bend areas have established pooling
water areas with continuing minor adjustments as bed loads shift from storm to storm.
Pools have maintained their scoured depths and support under bank fish habitat on outer
t meander bends. Overall, the comparisons of the 2010, 2008 and 2006 longitudinal
profiles indicate that a stable riffle and pool structure has been established in the reach for
the upper two-thirds of the restored reach. In the lower most one-third of the reach,
f however, backwater conditions were observed in the longitudinal profile due to incipient
beaver dam construction (see miscellaneous photos, App. G.).
Comparisons of as built, year 1, 3, and 5 monitoring cross sections show very
stable bed conditions. The cross sections show a progressive aggradation of inner berm
features, which should reach equilibrium with sediment transport dynamics in the next
few years.
Five years after construction, the high number of tree volunteers has made
counting each live tree within the entire buffer area, as had been done for the prior
monitoring events, impractical. In lieu of a comprehensive stem count, representative
plots were selected to determine success of the riparian buffer as specified in the original
monitoring protocol. The most heavily vegetated areas were purposely not selected for
plots so as not to skew the results. Two areas on the north riparian buffer and two on the
south riparian buffers were selected. These four plots total to approximately 1.10 acres,
which is 22.63% of the estimated conservation easement of 4.86 acres. With a target of
320 trees per acre, 1555 trees are required for the entire site. Stem counts for the four
plots were 2041 which is equivalent to 1855 trees per acre, which would suggest that
9,000 trees (±) are currently on site. The conservation easement was originally planted
with 12 tree species. There are now 28 species of trees and four species of shrubs on the
site equaling 32. Sweet-gum, Sycamore, River birch, and Green ash are the most
abundance volunteers. These four species account for 1535 stems in the four plots
counted, and alone equal 1395 stems per acre. The data indicates that the conservation
buffer surpasses, by a large margin, the required success survivorship numbers.
The stream banks of the restoration have faired much worse than the riparian buffers.
This is believed largely due to impacts by Beavers (Castor canadensis). Much of the
Silky willow and Silky dogwood has been cut for food and dam building material.
However, flooding of the banks upstream of the beaver dams exacerbated the cutting
damage by drowning the herbaceous and the woody vegetation. Beaver dams were
p. 16
removed in the Fall of 2009 prior to the macroinvertibrate sampling. The herbaceous
vegetation is recovering fairly well, but many of the woody stems along the lowest points
of the banks, primarily the first live stake row are dead. In some cases all three rows in
installed shrubs on both banks are severely impacted, reducing root protection to less that
30%. Many of the willows that survived the drowning and put out new growth are now
further stressed and may die due to damage by the Cottonwood leaf beetle (Chrysomela
scripta). These beetle larvae attack Cottonwood (Popidus deltoides), other Poplar
species, and Willows (Salix sp.) The larvae skeletonize leaves, while adults attack only
midrib and large veins. There can be up to 5 broods a year (Bug Guide,
http://bLqg( /V
uide.net`node' iew/4050). See photos of the pupa in the Miscellaneous
Photolog of Appendix 4C. It will be sometime later in the growing season before a
determination of what has survived the beavers and the beetle infestation can be
ascertained. Overall it is estimated that approximately 40% off the approximately 6,000
riparian shrubs initially installed as live stakes are dead or at risk.
The following recommendations and contingency actions to deal with the
observed short comings of this restoration effort are:
1. Extend vegetative, photo, and longitudinal monitoring for an additional
two growing seasons, with ongoing reports to agencies in:
a) January of 2011 (3`d macroinvertibrate report with update
on repairs),
b) September of 2011 (for plant community monitoring,
photo-documentation, and longitudinal profile), and
c) a final report in September of 2012 (for plant community
monitoring, photo-documentation, and longitudinal profile).
2. Remove beaver dam from lowermost section of steam restoration; and
consider removal of the cast iron culverts set longitudinally into the
stream bed (these are just down stream from the end of the restoration)
as they continually have been one of the focal points of beaver dam
construction.
3. Establish a bi-weekly inspection log for beaver activity, and remove
dams as needed to maintain stream water profile. Document with time
stamped photographs each inspection. Note extend of beaver foraging.
4. Perform blind autonomous 3`d party audits 2-3 times per year to verify
stewardship protocol by owner regarding impacts.
5. Replant all dead and severely stressed bank shrubs with new live stakes or
rooted materials as per the original planting plan in the upcoming
fall/winter of 2010. Give preference to species less vunerable to site
stressors.
6. Should beaver continue to forage the site beyond management
controls document all efforts to date and confer with agencies over
appropriate continuing stewardship protocols.
7. Maintain appropriate signage to limit impacts by ATV traffic, as
there continues to be evidence of incursions.
p. 17
' Appendix 2
Preconstruct:on Macroinvertebrate Data
1

1

1

n

n

1

' Reedy Fork Macroinvertebrate Pre-construction Survey
June 2001
As part of the pre-construction monitoring and baseline data compilation for the Reedy
' Fork Stream Restoration and Mitigation Project, Macroinvertebrate samples were
collected from a reference reach as well as an impaired reach. The reference reach is the
same stream that will be used to provide reference geomorphology parameters for the
' stream restoration design. The impaired reach is the same reach that has been identified
for restoration during the project. The streams were sampled on June 26, 2001 by Chris
Matthews (HDR) and Jim Matthews (HARP).
The DWQ protocols for processing benthic macroinvertebrate samples are discussed in
the STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES manual (NCEHNR 1997) and in the
INTERIM, INTERNAL TECHNICAL GUIDE BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE
MONITORING PROTOCOLS FOR COMPENSATORY STREAM RESTORATION
PROJECTS prepared by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality 401/Wetlands
Unit (NCEHNR 2001). Since these tributaries to Reedy Fork are 2nd order streams, an
approved collection method for smaller streams, known as the Qual-4, was used.
Qual-4 collection methods are recommended for small streams, which have catchments
of one square mile, or less (1st and 2nd order streams). All taxa are collected and
identified, rather than just Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) taxa, during
' this type of survey. The primary output for this sampling method is a taxa list with an
indication of relative abundance (Rare, Common, Abundant) for each taxon. The
calculation of metrics from a Qual-4 method is similar to those conducted for a standard
' qualitative collection method. These metrics include total and EPT taxa richness, EPT
abundance and biotic index values. Currently, DWQ does not have classification criteria
for small streams, therefore applicants are not required to calculate bioclassification
' ratings of these stream systems (NCENHR, 2001).
Benthic macro invertebrate samples are collected and preserved in the field. It is not
' necessary to know the total number of organisms from a specific habitat type when
qualitative or semi-qualitative samples are collected. Specimens are "picked" from the
' sample and preserved in 95% ethanol. The Qual-4 collection method takes approximately
one hour per site. Field processing samples in this fashion minimizes laboratory
processing.
' The following table and graphs show the taxa collected, as well as, metrics for total and
EPT taxa richness, EPT abundance and biotic index values.

H

r

Order Family/Species Feeder
type Tolerance
value Reference Impaired
E hemero tera
Caenis spp. 3 7.41 Abundant
Stenonema spp. 3 Common Common
Polonranthus distinctus 3 1.53 Common
Odonata
Dronrogomphus spp. 5 5.92 Common Rare
Aeshna spp. 5 6.00 Rare
Tricho tera
Kydropsyche betteni 2 7.78 Abundant Abundant
Neophylax oligius 4 2.23 Abundant
Coleo tera
Celina spp. 5 8.04 Rare
Ectopria nervosa 4 4.16 Rare
Elmidae 4 Abundant Common
Di tera
Tipulidae 1 7.33 Rare Common
Chironomidae 3 9.63 Rare Abundant

Other
Pelee oda Corbicula fluminea 2 6.12 Rare Common
Gastro oda Pulmonate snails Coirunon Conunon
Hirudinea Leech 5 5.00 Rare
Deca oda Crayfish 6 Abundant Abundant
Feeder types: 0=herbivore, 1=shredder, 2=filter feeder, 3=collector, 4=scraper,
' 5=predator, 6=omnivore, 7=deposit feeder

1

1
1

1

1

J

1
r

Metrics
Metric Reference Reach Impaired Reach

Total Richness
13 - Fair
12 - Fair
EPT Taxa Richness 4 - Poor 3 - Poor
EPT Abundance 46% 37%
Biotic Index Value 5.97 = Good/Fair 7.37 = Fair

1

1
u

1

11
1
1

Appendix 3.A.
The Planform Map showing Locations of Cross Sections & Photostations
p. 1
1

r t -
r _
\
\
LM
O
\ of xc N
o N
a
\ f ?? m s i _ Jn,
V?-
rVv v t.J
\
a
C
Rf

N ?
? O
A
U
C

t

N.0 E
7 O
A >+ O
= ?
c
o?(n: -2
-Z8 -0 w
O r-
(D

c O) ca c
o
O 'D E
OY0
(U= O N

C ?n A
d .?i..r ?
O
0
CL

O
s
°

C?
U

w L

o

o o
O N
N
L O

.5 N

c
co
aN
E
v

t0 s ca
A
v O
Q M
M
C
O
U
N
N
N
I? r
F
SS?Ei-]IW ??-'
alt ?
3
a
U)
w
v
Q
J O
a
O
L
rr
Aff
N
>E
a
1 a ?
t o
a ,a.ong O
"f O
U
N
N
N
r N
U ?
J
41
/S O
!jam ?
N
N
O
E.?.n.,da U
Y ?
4
o th ? VI
g ? o
o a r?°"•
°
° I a
t
\
a - ?
0
a
0
0
cu
ti
U
a Cl)
U >%
,r Q
Q
O
? v
v ?\6 0
o ?
N
\ cn
N
O
° JS cPl'
SyVO S? :? n
[f
'A9b . q d rj
n a
R PARKW Ay
m m
List of Photos
Photo 1. Photo station # 1. Lower Tie-in, looking downstream, Azimuth = 18 degrees
Photo 2. Photo station 4 1. Looking upstream, Azimuth = 283 degrees ........................
Photo 3. Photo station # 2. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 31 degrees ............................................... .............
Photo 4. Photo station # 2.
......
Looking upstream, Azimuth = 287 degrees.. ................ ...................
............. 2
Photo 5. Photo station # 3. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 80 degrees ............................................... ............. 3
Photo 6. Photo station # 3. Looking upstream, Azimuth = 223 degrees .................................................. ............. 3
Photo 7. Photo station 4 4. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 34 degrees .............................................. .............. 4
Photo S. Photo station # 4. Looking upstream, Azimuth = 320 degrees ................................................. .............. 4
Photo 9. Photo station # 5. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 77 degrees .............................................. .............. 5
Photo 10 . Photo station # 5 . Upper Tie-in, looking upstream, Azimuth = 309 degrees ......................... .............. 5
Photo 11 . Photo station 4 6. Over-all view, looking downstream, from Reedy Fork Parkway .............. .............. 6
c

..`'.`
z
vv
. ,J may' 4

Photo 4. Photo station # 2. Looking upstream, Azimuth = 287 degrees.

Photo 1. Photo station # 1. Lower Tie-in, looking downstream, Azimuth = 18 degrees
Photo 2. Photo station # 1. Looking upstream, Azimuth= 283 degrees.

, 4"W4
J
t
Photo 3. Photo station # 2. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 31 degrees.

7
ri

'ET
' j y
i.-
4
al-
t• t4 ` Yom' ?,'E"a
:iV
f
§
%
photo 6. Photo station # 3. Looking upstream, Azimuth = 223 degrees.
I

t
1
Photo 7. Photo station # 4. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 34 degrees.
4

Photo 9. Photo station # 5. Looking downstream, Azimuth = 77 degrees
Photo 10. Photo station # 5. Upper Tie-in, looking upstream, Azimuth = 309 degrees.
5
x

.. , .:
t . "
:
Photo 11. Photo station # 6. Over-all view, looking downstream, from Reedy Fork Parkway,
Junction 29 road sign.
6
Appendix 3.C.
Plot of Cross Sections
p.
c
0
i
1
I
Ij
C4
C
U ®?
c Q?
0
0
(4) UolaeA913
0
0
a
C)
cD
C
65
C?
a
a
y
U
ti
:n
4T
ca
CQ
C
0
a>
U
i
7
c!3
C
J
0
0
co
C
d
Ln
Q
T
R
3
C
(6
?J
.o
v
Un
G ( ?J
i3 G
?, LU
ys ©%
C ?4?L
Q
o C?
cu
w Can,
? I
C)
? yr
i
L
C3
to O 1} O O LO O LO O
L
co CC) rl- fl- m m N- P,
CO CO CO c0 c0 co co cc
f_
j Y' r

T_

O
2
co
%
O
d'
O
N
-rte O
m O 1] O
O co
(4) uelleAal3
U
L
w7. ?
O ?

CQ
G
(O
J
O
O
co
N
C3
C
O
'IT
O
N
Cl
O to © LC! O
00 CD co fl,
O 9
(4) UOIWAS13
i
I
L
I
? 0
I
L
? I
Lo'9
C?
Q%
WD
G
N
•L ?
co
d c0'?
cn
I
C-1 L G
?e CCU
W
N Ci7
I'
I
I
yf
I 1
r ?,

1
1
1
1

Appendix 3.D.
Cross Section Tabtes
p. 4
REEDY FOITUK
S-Suiillt
Longitudinal Profile and Crass sections
goes Section Data m UT to R?srJ7 FoPX Rn- ttoralion Sits

John T Soule, Steve Harville
17-18 May 200A

1
1

1
1
1
1
STA
! BS(+) Bed/Ground
HI FS(-)? WATER Water
NoteJComments
(ft) i Elevation I DEPTH Elevation
ft ft it ft ft fti
TBM 116 E.2 684.57 ' 7.6 67,25.37
Crass-%actkNi # 1 ( iNFLECTICkI j
John T Soule, Ste•te Harville
iCNcc;•-04
STA I
(ft) BS(+)

ft HI

it FS(-)I

ft Bed/Ground (
Elevation
ft WATER
DEPTH
ft Water Notes/Comments
Elevation
fri
I
0+00 5.27 679.30 I
10 5.60 678.97
20 5.57 679.00
39 I 5.621 1 678:95
40 I 5.47 679.10
466 5.43 679-.14 ,Top of Bark
49 6.521 678.05
52 7.49 677.08
54 I 8•.27 676.30_ 0.001
- 676.30 Edae
57 ---- - 8.351 1 676.22 - 0.20) 15.42
6@ I 8.46 676.11 0.33 1 676.44
63 8.50 676.07 0.381 1 676.45
67 8.53 676.04 I 0.42 j 67646
6?r-, 5 8.18 676.39 1 0.001 1 676.39 Edge
72 I 7.45 677.12 I
75 I 5.e6 675.61
73 4.43 6c J. 14
81 2.72 681.85 V Top of Bank, END
TP # 17 1 4.21, 683.57 5.27 675.30
TP # 13 4.5 682.76 5-21 1 678.23 I
I ?
::-SEC # 1 at Longitudinal Sta.15+57
664.57
Longitudinal at x-sec sta. 61
0+00, to 0+81 Azimuth = 136 degrees
REEDY FOR3K
As-Built
Longitudinal Profile and Cross Sections
1
1
John T Soule. Steve Handle
Cross-Section .0 2 (MEANDER ), Gums 9 8
5-Ncv-04

1
1

1
1
1
1
! II I
O+CG 3.981 1 678.78 I ! Ground
1 C 5.05 677.71 1
2C 5.31 677.45 1
K 5.27 677.49
4G 5.29 67747 i
48? 5.28 677.48 Top of Bank
52 6.18 676.58
55 t- 7.16 675.60
?P 8.03 674.73
58 8.26 i 674.5E O.CO 674.50 Edge ofwatter
6.? 8.75 674.0^ 0.47 674.48
65 8.79 673.97 0.52 1 1 674.4_ '
61& 8.73 674.03 0.45 i 674.48 '
70.5 8.50 674.25 0.234 674.49
72 8.27 1 1 674.49 0.00 I 674.49 Ed a of water
74 7.36 i 1 675.40
77 6.09 676.67 1
8 1. 5.11 1 1 677.65 1 E14D
TP # 19 4.23 ' 681.90 5.09J 1 677.67
TP 1112 676.`0 5.40 1 1 676.50 OUT -0.02 Wood Stale
I i I
X-SEC # 2 at Longitudinal Sta. 11+05
Longitudinal at ;t-sec sta. 64.3
O+OG:?o 0+80 Azimuth = 123 degrees
John T Soule, Steve Harrilie
5-Nov-04
S7A
BS(+)

R?
HI FS(A
I
ft ft EedlGround '

Elevation
ftI WATER

DEPTH
ft slater
I
Elevation
tt
Notes/Ccmments

TP ;12 5.5r 682.03 676.52 I Wood Stake
O+C0 5.311 1 676.77 Ground
10 5.58 576.40
2G: 5.90 1 676.18
30 5.821 1 676.26
40: 5.791 1 676.29
4?i, 6.09 ' 675.99 To of Bank
52 1 7.181 1 674.90
55 8.171 1 673.91
5E, 9.41 1 1 672.67 0.00 1 672.67 Edge of water
61 ! 9.56 1 1 672.52 0.17 672.69
64. 9.85 672.23 0.47 672.70
67 9.71 672.37 0.33 1 672.70
70. 5 9.40 672.68 0-00 1 1 672.68 Edge of water
73 8.10 673.98
75 6.98 675.10
8101 5.56 i 1 676.52 I Top of Bank, END
TP 14:12 616.52 1 5.5 610.52 i (OUT 0.00

K-SEC # 3 at Longitudinal Sta. 3+73
Lonciltudinai at):-sec sta. 63.7
0+00 to 0+80 4zimuth = 123 degrees
2
Cross-Section 13 ( !NFLECT!ON )
REEDY FORK
As-Built

John T. Soule
Reedy Fork
As-built
Cross-Section # 4 ( INFLECTION )
13-Jan-05
STA
BS(+)
(ft) I
tt
HI Fa()

ft ft Bed/Ground
Elevation

ft WATER
DEPTH

ft Water
Elevation

ft
Notes/Comments
r= _
Sz.
To of Wood Stake
0 2.61 677.73 To of # 4 Rebar, Ground level
10 2.97 677.37
20 3.24 677.10
30 144 676.90
40 3.201 1 677.14
50 1 3.241 677.10
60 3.35 676.99
70 3.201 67714
74 144 676.90 Top of Bank
76 4.23 676.11
78 5.08 675.26
80 5.98 674.36
81.1 6.53 673.81 0.00 673 81 Edge
83 6.70 673.64 0.20 673 84
85 6.80 673.54 0.27 673.81
87 ! 6.841 673 50 0 30 673 80
89 6.81 673.53 0.28 67331
91 6.62 ! 673.72 0.07 67379
93 6.74 i 673.60 0.20 673 30
93.5 6.56 1 673.78 0.00 673 78 Edge
95 5.665 ! 674.69
97 4.67 675.67
99 3.80 676.54
101 ! 2.92 577.42
103 2.40 677.94 Top of Bank, END

Inflection Between Curves 10 & 11
0+00 to 1+03 Azimuth = 106 degrees

1

11
REEDY FORK
As-Built

L
1

1

1
r

Reedy Fork
As-built
Cross-Section # 5 ( MEANDER)
John T. Soule
13-Jan-05
STA BS I
(ft) (+)
i
ftl
HI
ft Bed/Ground
FSO Elevation
ft ft WATER
DEPTH
ft Water
Elevation
ft Notes/Comments
To of Wood Stake
0 4.221 675.22 To of # 4 Rebar, Ground level
10 4.351 675.09
20 4.22; 675.22
30 4.37 ' 675.07
38.3 4.52, 1 674.92 To of Bank
40 4.88 674.56
42 5.73 673.71
44 6.35 673.09
46 7.12 672.32
46.8 7.18 672.26 Back of coir fiber to
47.4 6.88 ! 672.56 Top centerline of coir fiber to
48 ! 8.001 671.44 7 6 Face of coir fiber log, Edge
50 7.94 671.50 N 672.12
52 7.941 1 671.50 672.13
54 7.981 1 671.46 672.15
56 8.02 ' 1 671.42 672.15
58 7.55 671.89 0.28 672.17
58.9 7.30 672.14 0.00 672.14 Edge
61 6.32 673.12
63 5.77 1 1 673.67
65 5.09 1 674.35
67 4.46 1 674.98
69 3.88 1 675.56
71 3.31 1 676.13
73 2.69 1 676.75 Top of Bank, END
I
Meander at mid-point of Curve 17
0+00 to 0+73 Azimuth = 143 degrees
1
L

Appendix 3.E.
Plot of Longitudinal Profile
1

1

1

1
p.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1
1
1
q)
+1/
Vl
c
0o-
s4
A
W C
b?
P
a
® W
W

`o
C
C
tl
R

C
C
._ C
e
Q

I

N
:A

L

t?
CG
n
U
C.
fit
0
s
U
O.
O
G
C?

N 0 n Q m a o m
n n n n n n ? n ?
of 8C.£},
4
al ?
u
co
67
I
? I
N
7
0
a
m
c
c
? I
-0. i
nNl
?o
I
a
twU N I
2 '
I
1
Appendix 3.F.
Logitudinal Profile Tables

1

1
1

i

p. 6

Reedy Fork
Ai-bulft
Longitudinal Profile Data

1

1
1

1

n
John T Soule, Steve Hanaille
6-Nov-08
STA
M. ; BS(+)
{ILI i
it
Hi

ft
FS(-)

ft 0ed/(Srcund
jWATER DEPTH I
Elevation
ft 'cater

Elc-' aeon
tt
(votes/Ccnments

Bbi # 1 0.29 683.69 683.40 F.? 'J' 'n t3tsof27'V.SI' rr p;Y
TP # 1 4.72 680.41 8.00 675.69 675.69
-18 10.43 669.98 0.81 670.79 BOR
0 9.47 670.94 0.41 671.35
20 j 9.03 671.33 0.40 671.78
44 8.78 671.63 0.47 672.10 TOR
64 9.19 671.22 0.20 672.12
84, 8.98 671.43 0.71r 672.14
104 9.07 671.34 0.81 672.15
110 9.02 671.39 0.76 672.15 BOR
130 8.66 671.75 0.45 672.20
150 8.821 671.59 0.66 672.25 TOR
170 8.84 671.57 0.69 672.26
191 8.89 671.52 075 672.27 BOR
211 8.58 671.83 0.48 6722.31
233 8.40 672.01 G.37 672.38 TOR
253 9.10 671.31 1.06 672.39
269 6.91 671.50 0;. 90 672.40 FOR
239. j 8 2.47
TP # 11 5.441 1 681.29 675.85
305 ( 9221 672.07 ( a 53 672.60 ITOR
325 9.40 1 1 671.89 U 672.02
3--46 9.30 671.99 0.63 672.62 BOR
j 3or 9.16 672.13 0.53 672.65
335 9.09 672.20 0.62 672.82 TOR
405 9.02 072.27 0.57
4
572.8
411
9.03
672.26
0.5e
672. a4
50x2
431 8.91 672.38 0.51 672.89
451 8.84 672.45 0.52 672.97
460 , 8.75 672.54 0.47 673.01 TOR
480, 9.14 672.15 0,87 673. M2
497 9.03 1 672.26 0.76 6731.02 BOR
511 8-60 1 1 67 2.60 0.36 673.05
541 8.366 ' 672.93 0.43 673.36 OR
561 9.00 672.29 1.07 673;3
! 581 9.02 672.27 1.09 673.36
500 8.77 672.52 0.84 673.36 BOR
TP # 12 4.5` 631.07 4.77 676.52
1 TP # 13 8.1 7 5 684.14 5.1 01 675.97 i ( V
EM # 1 0.7 7 683.37 OUT -0.0.3
)
n

1

1

1
1

D

C'
1

1
John T Soule Slave Harv;lle
17-18 IMaw 2004
STA I 1
BS(r?
ittl
Hi

it
FS(-)

it Bed/Ground ,

Elevation
it .. R I
vvA cry DEPTH {

fit Water

Eie ... fae .9on
fitl
?JatesiCornri rents

TEM # 12 5.33 681.85 676.52 I Wood Stake
620 9.05 672.79 C. cQ 673.39
640 8.84 673.01 0.47 673.4E
eeo 1 8.821 I 673.03 0.56 1 673.59 1
675 8.73 673.12 0.58 673.70 TOR
695 8.92 672.93 0.80 873.73
705 8.95 672.90 0.84 673.74
725 9.06 672.79 0.93 673.72
745 8.66 672.99 0.74 673.73
757 8.80 673.05 0.67 673.72 BOR
777 8.47 673.38 0.47 673.85
802 8,21 673.64 0.39 674.03 TOR
822 8.42 673.43 0.62 674.05
847 8:44 673.41 0.66 674.07 BOR
867 8.481 673.37 0.76 674.13
890 7.22+8 673.87 l 0.43 i 674.30 TOR
TEM # 14 ' 7.87 682.77 6.95 674.90
910 9.59 673.38 0.94 ; C-74.32
930 9.18 673.59 0.69 674.28
9553 9.12 673.55 0.67 674.32 BOR
973 8.86 673.91 0.46 674.37
994 8.70 674.07 0.44 674.51 TOR
1014 8.78 67199 0.51 674.50 BOR
1034 8.74 674.03 0.60 674.83
1049 8.58+ 674.19 0.55 674.74 TOR
1069 { 8.581 1 677 4.19 0.60 674.79
1077 J'.83 673.94 0.83 674.77 BOR
1097 e.38 674.39 0.47 6742E6
1117 8.03 574.74 0.31 575.05
1123 7.88 674.89 0.30 675.19 TOR
1143 8.46 674.31 0.95 675.26.
1163 8.27 674.50 0.75 f 675.26
1183 ( 8.39 674.38 1 0.87 675.25
1200 8.21 674.56 0.70 675.26
TBM # 15 8.09 684.06 6.80 675.97
1220 9.40 674.66 0.59 675.25
1230 9.29 ( 674.77 0.52 675.29 BOR
1250 9.32 674.74 0.59 675.33
1270 9.18 674.88 0.51 675.39
1288 9.20 674.86 0.63 7 675.49 TOR
1308 9.42 674.64 0.85 675.49
1328 9.09 674.97 0.54 675.51
1348 9.10 674.96 0.54 675.50
1374 I 9.27 674.79 0.71 675.50 BOR
1394 l 9.02 675.04 0.55 675.59
1417 a.-18 1 675.28 0.44 675.72 TOR
1

1

1

1

CIS

1
1443 S. 86 675.20 0.54 675.74 BOR
1463 I 8.70 675.36 0.51 675.87
1484 8.60 675.46 0.55 675.01 TOR
1504 9.01 675.05 0.951 1 676.00
1518 8.95 675.11 0.901 1 676.01 BOR
1538 8.26 675.80 O.381 1 676.18
1561 , 8.20 675.86 0.60 676.46 TOR
TBM 916 8.2 634.57 7.63 676.37
1581 8.96 675.61 0.901 1 676.51
1601 9. CY9 , 675.48 co,
1 676.51
1621 8.58 675.99 Li 676.50
1641 8.6E 675.89 0.65 676.54 BOR
1661 8.53 675.04 0.50 676.54
1681 3.41 576.16 0.42 676.58
1697 8.53 678.04 0.60 678.64 TOR
1717 8.79 675.78 0.88 676.66
1737 8.62 675.95 0.70 676.65
1757 10.00 674.57 2.06 676.65
1764 9.43 675.14 1.51 676.65 END

Appendix 3.G.
Copy of Conservation Easement

A
W
W
A
O
LM '
O
?- O W u
LL FT1 Z C!I Z • rr
H C.t/ ?- A ?' !J
W a W 1J ? U1
U W CL W 'r U": R
W W Ar- 1?M
C-11 W Z l? ,a i
M 0 L; t LL O W
JOO
Z [??
H H W c:
A n Ld m
X tt3 A H ?- i..: lZ1

U A W F F Li. ..

C) W
¢
? o 0 ca ' 27404
U ce- ¢ rr-
CJ
m
4m CL
H
U3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
GUILFORD COUNTY
Mail'to Preparer
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this/y ' day of .2002, by
and between REEDY FORK EAST LLC, Grantor, and the CITY OF GREENSBOR Grante , whose mailing
address is Post Office Box 3136, Greensboro. NC 27402. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein
shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular. plural, masculine,
feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions ofN.C. Gen. Stat. 3 143-214.8 - - the State of North Carolina
has established the Wetlands Restoration Program (as defined in N.C. Gen Stat. 143-214.8) within the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring,
enhancing, and creating wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of
water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, multi-use trails, recreational
opportunities: and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. 3143-214.8, two of the components of the
Wetlands Restoration Program are (1) restoration and perpetual maintenance of wetlands, riparian areas, and
surface waters and (2) land ownership and management; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Guilford
County, North Carolina (the Protected Property), and being more particularly described on Exhibit A hereto,
and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement on the Protected Property, thereby
' restricting and limiting the use of the Protected Property to the terms and conditions and for the purposes
hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such easement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions
hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its
successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to

' the extent hereinafter set forth, over a portion of the Protected Property, referred to hereafter as the Easement
Area, for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as described on Exhibit
A hereto.
' The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, and create wetland
and/or riparian. resources in the Easement Area that contributes to the protection and improvement of water
quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, recreational opportunities and multi-use
' trails; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and
to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To
achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:

' t. DURATION OF EASEINtENT
This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. It is an easement in gross. runs with the land, and is
enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, their personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, lessees,
agents, and licensees.

II. RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere
with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any
' activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this
Conservation Easement. Any tights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the
Grantee. The following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
' A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right: to undeveloped recreational uses.
including fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of
motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited except for maintenance purposes.
' B. Educational Uses. The Grantor and Grantee shall have the right to undeveloped educational
uses and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized
educational activities such as site visits, studies, and observations.
' C. Vegetative Cutting. Except for maintenance necessary for public safety, cutting, removal,
mowing, harming, or destruction of any vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited.
D. Industrial Use. Industrial activities in the Easement Area are prohibited.
E. Residential Use. Residential use of the Easement Area is prohibited.
' F. Commercial Use. Commercial activities in the Easement Area are prohibited.
G. Agricultural Use. Agricultural use of the Easement Area including use for cropland, waste
lagoons, or pastureland is prohibited.
H. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, or other structure
' constructed or placed in the Easement Area.
1. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing
restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs identifying the
owner of the Protected Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, and signs
giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area.
J. Dumping. Dumping of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliance or
machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation.
dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil. sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or
other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
' channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the
' diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any
means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands,
or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited.
M. Subdivision. Subdivision, partitioning, or dividing the Easement Area is prohibited.
' N. Development Rights. No development rights which have been encumbered or extinguished
by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development
rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise.
L
The Grantee, and authorized representatives
asement
Area and shall have the right of reasonable ingress and egress rto the Easement Area over the Protected
' Property, at all reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor
the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement Area. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and
herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as
' needed to direct in-stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. In addition, the Grantee, and
authorized representatives of the Grantee, shall have the right to enter the Easement Area and shall have the
right of reasonable ingress and egress to the Easement Area over the Protected. Property, at all reasonable
' times for the purpose of inspecting said property to determine if the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement. The easement rights granted herein do
not include public access rights.
' The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown,
provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor
shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the Wetlands
Restoration Program, whose mailing address is 1619 Mail Services Center, Raleigh. NC 27699.1619.
III. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
' A. In the event that the Grantee determines that the Grantor has violated or is threatening to
violate any of these terms, conditions, or restrictions, the Grantee may institute a suit to
enjoin such violation and if necessary, to require the restoration of the Easement Area to its
' prior condition at the expense of the Grantor.
B. No failure on the part of Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shall discharge
or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the
' right of Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This Conservation Easement shall be construed to promote the purposes of NC. Gen Stat. -
143-214.8 et -- the Wetlands Restoration Program.
' B. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation
Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements
relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder
' of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to
persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
' C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties
at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
' D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the
Protected Property or any part thereof is to he transferred at or prior to the time said transfer
is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument
' by which any interest in the Protected Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation
Easement herein created.
V. QUIET ENJOYMENT
t Grantor reserves all rights accruing from ownership of the Protected Property, including the
right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are
' expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the
purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor
u

n

expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the
Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the
aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor
will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal, the day and year first
above written,
or, ? ?v N T•C0,4,o
SEAL
ATTEST:
ASSISTANtC RET ARP
REEDY FORK EAST LLC
BY: STARMOUNT COMPANY
DE PMENT MANAG
BY: Al
VICE PRESIDENT
' (SEAL)
NORTH CAROLINA, GUILFORD COUNTY
' I, c,
a Notary Public in and for said County and State, certify
that -
6? - , personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he
is Assistant Secretary of Starmount Co pany, a corporation, and that, by authority duly given and as the
' act of the Corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Vice President, sealed with
its corporate seal, and attested by himself as it Assistant Secretary.
My commission expires: A?fA .2 3
Witness, my hand and official seal, this the day ofV 2002
00
' Notary Public

EXHIBIT A
A CONSERVATION EASEMENT BEING 59.5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERN 100 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ECKERSON
ROAD S.R. NO. 2790 WHERE SAID 100' RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERSECTS WITH AN EXISTING
CREEK, (SAID POINT BEING S 11 DEG 38 MIN 02 SEC W DISTANCE BEING 281.20 FEET FROM
AN EXISTING IRON PIPE ON SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ECKERSON ROAD) THENCE WITH
THE CENTERLINE OF A PROPOSED CREEK ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
CHORD BEARING OF S84 DEG 43 MIN 05 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE BEING 51.16 FEET WITH
A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
CHORD BEARING OF N 75 DEG 08 MIN 24 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE BEING 85.91 FEET WITH
A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
CHORD BEARING OF N 81 DEG 25 MIN 17 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE BEING 88.21 FEET WITH
A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
CHORD BEARING OF N 78 DEG 00 MIN 23 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE BEING 85.03 FEET WITH
A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
CHORD BEARING OF S80 DEG 29 MIN 08 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE BEING 99.39 FEET
HAVING A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT
HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 80 DEG 02 MIN 01 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE BEING 106.82
FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG THE CURVE TO THE
RIGHT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 30 DEG 42 MIN 32 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE
BEING 64.28 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE
TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 30 DEG 35 NUN 20 SEC E CHORD DISTANCE
BEING 64.46 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A CURVE
TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 46 DEG 44 MIN 13 SEC E CHORD
DISTANCE BEING 85.50 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG
A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 49 DEG 53 MIN 14 SEC E CHORD
DISTANCE BEING 81.44 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG
A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD, BEARING OF N 56 DEG 15 MIN 41 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 88.64 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
S 67 DEG 48 MIN 03 SEC E DISTANCE BEING 65.43 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG A
CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 62 DEG 02 MIN 58 SEC E CHORD
DISTANCE BEING 83.72 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG
A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 48 DEG 54 MIN 50 SEC E CHORD
DISTANCE BEING 74.36 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE ALONG
THE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 50 DEG 55 MIN 08 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 68.58 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 54 DEG 28 MIN 56 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 73.47 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 53 DEG 16 MIN 16 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 73.93 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 53 DEG 48 MIN 52 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 73.90 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 43 DEG 33 MIN 58 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 86.30 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE
ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF N 13 DEG 46 MIN 44 SEC E
CHORD DISTANCE BEING 37.22 FEET WITH A RADIUS OF 53.50 FEET TO THE END OF
EASEMENT, EASEMENT AREA CONTAINING 4.86 AC MORE OR LESS
Appendix 4.A.-a
Photostation Photos
P. 8
Tributary to Reedy Fork Creek
Haw River Watershed, Cape Fear Basin
Greensboro Area - Guilford Co. NC
First Monitoring Event Photo Log
Photographed
18 May 2006

yi
Looking downstream at Lower Tie-in
s
... y t ?..y aty ?,f e
L ? r, ? Yr
? 2 s
s z
er»
s
n '
_r t r
F
5
t # ;
Photo 2. Photo Station # 1. Looking upstream
Photo 1. Photo Station # 1.

n
w
Photo 9. Photo Station # 5.

y?

V 7,
d _06,510
?a
1 141, x= c .cs 'r'te
sy ,
; N
Photo 10. Photo Station 4 5. Looking upstream at Lipper Tie-in
Looking downstream
M6
__ - i
?a
,,,
?: .
,? „I
`" T , --x - , ax "' I
s ? ? .x ?.
?-- r ;,? `?' ;? ' -' ?????
u
_?
?.
._.?-•, ?
-? «r- ?
'ms
F
._
e ? ?.
. _.
_. ?,,
...?_ _. ,,. ...:, ? , _, _ _?„.„. "a=te ? . ?..`?
Appendix 4.A.-b
Cross Sections
p. 9

l?l
?S1J
Qq?p
1?1J
r-
I ? t

c

i
/J
1
?I.
I
f
r?

u
O
P
I
i

r?
i
i
1
O

U
d
7
r
D
N
- O
C) LO 0 LO 0
0) OD GO I- tl-
co 0 CD (0 co
(4) U0118Aal3

I
I i

I
I
1
9

i

01

Po
i
9

1
?S
1
i
3
l
1
1
l)
i
I
+
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
I
1
i
?
co OD I` I ,-
co co co co (14) UOIIBAOl3
m 3
N m i
Q ? I
Q' O
? N

i
i
I
i

N
of S

? it
CO! O
U

U
'
a)
i

N LV
m L, O

O
C

i O

ccz
? I
?
C I
cC
0 ?
I,

O
d 4 -+
C
4-
E Z75
? O
O O
cp
CM
® -d"'
E
cu
? +r

I
O
J
It , (?
?J
LO C) LO 0
00 00 1--
CD co CD
(>r}) u01}ena13
l?
°o
O
00
o
v
O
N
O
CD co co c
(4) UOIJenaj?g
I
e
r
I
1
i
r
a
? J

JP

m?
P
r

ly
N
I
A
1
f
tl
I

0
O

a?
U
zi
0
0
O
N
? O
z 0 O CEO
(4) UOI;eAaj?j

m
n
?
m

Q
> N
y >.
? A
m
0
N
>
J cn
9
> m
nJ
O N
p e CU
c Ln
ca
I
i
4--
W
4?
O ?
43 •?O
CC
s? • c
v ?
L° E
T ca
CL) Ln
I I
?I
I
? I
L'i
J I J -?
Appendix 4.A.-c
Cross Section Tables

1
1
I p. 10
1
1

t

1

c
c
'i
O

O

rl

0
d
}

c

ul
FA
0
L

lO
i.1
R

L
3

QV

lC

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. 0
. OO
. CO
. CO
. CO
. CO
. CO
. CO
. C0 C0 00 00 00 00 00 CO CO

4
4
4
V
?f
d
?i
d
V
d'
tt . .
d .
?t .
?t . .
d . . .
of
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
= to co to to t0 to ?o t0 O O ?O co to O to tp to to tp ?O to tO tO ?O

C cc
01 y ,,

o E ,.
°
a?
v

° Lu w w
I-
M V* M - M M N rn
_ ? 6 M c M Ct d' M
L. 0 t0 N LD co to to ?o t1O
0Z N ?O N N N N N N
4d to to tD tD z to tO z
3a
W
O Ln 00 M M N N
00
0 0 U
W
=
0
0
0
0
0

M 01 Ln N Lo Ln to to v v M Ln ri m M m .-r N N to N N ,-?
= C 01 01 01 O O ,1 LO M r-i N v N r i Ti O N r-1 O M N Ln d' N
=O N
O w oo
N op rn
N rn
n cO r?
n r,
n z 6
N z
N O ko
n Ln ?o
N N
w tD
N ?o
N N
N co
? ON
N 0
M r4
m
L
?o co ?O cO ?o ?o Bo a ?o ?o ?o ?o ?o z z z z to to z

a?
?W

N M N M N N %0 0 M O 01 N Ti r-1 M N ri Ln Ln to Ln Ln -4
Ln 00 00 r? tD N O z O M Ln r N O Ln M N 01 Ln N M li
^ Ln Ln Ln LA on o to N 00 0J w w o6 m 00 OD 00 N to Ln v m
t
U.
O O O O O cO CO O N V m N M r-f M Ln N O? M Ln N m -I
" N M v V V Ln Ln Ln L( Ln Ln to t D ko tO %O N N N N N W
Ln

?1
M
O
O
2
L
N
C
O
v
d
FA
H
UI
O
L
V
d.+
l0
O
L
M
O
l0
r1 r1 r1 rt r1 rf r1 rt r1 f-, r1 ri rl rt rl ri r1 r1 ri ri r1 rl rL

co
?o co
co o?
LD co
cc co co
?o co ao
?o oo
z co
to ao
tO ao
to m
?o an
tO co
z ao
0 ao
t.o ao
to w
to a?
z co
to co
ko ao
to
_

\ C LTA ?
.w+ E
O ? 4J ?
? N
?
W fL- w w
r1 M .-? r1 ri N
= M ? M M M M M
L O v N v v IT v q'
tO ko tO ?D tO to

3:.i
W
0 .1 tt m In W
LO N !11 Ln ? N
cc = 6 0 0 6 6 6
W F.

30
'a W N M N N Ln N M N N tO r-4 M N W tO M CO N N N W V
C = N O M d- V M M N 0 rL Z M Z Ln N N O 0 00
4 M
u? N
6 0
3O O r? n r NN N 6 6 Ln 111 m et M M M M M C
l0 ?p ?O ?O cp ?O tO tO tO tO O LD t0 t0 t0 t0 ?0 cO ?O t0 ' ?D t0 cO t0
?
_O
?W
m
M
to V
N 00
O 0)
O M
M Z
O 1*
V CO
r1 V
N V
N Lol
N 4
6 N
P? C
CO M
?q Ln
tO 00
Ln M
M rn
In
0 01
.1 M
M N
01
11 O N O lO r,: r< 00 06 6 rn rf O O O O O O O j'6 o6 r? O
? r! rl rl rl r-1 •-i
v
LL
I?
O O O O O ON r i M Ln N ON w N 0 Ln N M Ln N v 0 O O
r1 N M Ln Ln In Ln Ln 6 lO trl ? l0 t0 ? ? N ? ? 00
Ln lO I?

O?
C
.i
0
._
0
z
ri
L
R
M
C
0
v
0
(a
H
0
L
U
R
++
10
L
3
_O
ao oo co ao ao co ao co co co 0o co o? o? ao w co ao co co ao oo
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
oo co o0 0o oo o0 00 00 oa oo co oo o0 0? ao oo oo oo co co o0 00
?O LO ?o ?0 ?0 ?0 ?o ?o ?o ?0 ?o ?o ?o co ?o ?o ?0 ?o ?0 ?o ?o ?0
_

O c

w 0
a?+ w
O
a? v
v

° w w w
f-
v 00 ON n co 0)
? ?o co ?0 ?o w ?o
L O N N N N N N
N n n n N
.0 c0 tp t0 l0 t0 c0

0 N L1 Ln 0
f ? ,
.?
0 0 0

Q

N .1 Ln N O N v N N co v co C Z M O 01 T 00 00 00
_ C I? u'1 N M M O M ? M t0 t0 d' M N Ln Z Ln V. '1 0 Ln
OO ?0 t0 00 t0 Z Z Ln N N M N N N N N N N M V L1 L1 6
0•- I? N n N N N N Z 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N
6 R Z 0 Z z Z Z Z Z Z l0 z Z Z Z Z Z Z l0 0 Z
?>

?W
m
.i I? M ? O? ?D d' 00 0O tO N ef' ?t C N t11 0? 0 » I? O? M
r-1 M l0 11'1 C CO Ln r-I N u7 N u't t0 M .-i N '? I11 t1'1
M Ln ui ui Sri ui Z N n 0 m of of of of w N
i
v
U.
0 0 0 0 0 M1 4 M U'1 N M Ln N It Z M .i N qt Z OO 0
rq N M qr T U1 Ln V) V) V) 0 t0 Z ko Z 0 N N N N m
c0 I?

1

L
O
r.?

a-1
L

O

v
O

N
O
L

R

lC
C

O

L
3

W
O

1

?
. N
. ?
. N
. n
. N
. N
. n
. n
. N
. N
. 1?
. n
. N n N n N
. n n
. N
. N
. N N N
.
N N N N N N N N N N N N N .
N .
N .
N .
N N ..
N N N N .
N .
N N
m m m m m w m m m m w w w w w w m m m w w m m m m
= LD tD z LD z t0 ?D tD tD cD LD LD LD tO LD z LO t0 O z LD CD tD O tD

U.
C [D
? 47
£ w
0 ?
O °U
f v
_0
° w L w
1- !-
z Ln LM l0 N LO M
= CO CO CO 00 00 0? OD
L O M M M M M M M
4) -,Z
n
n
N
n
n
n
0
IQ
to
to
z
t0
to
z
z
y
g
?
W
M /rf? r
O
ri N M O
U O O O O O
J

a W
I
°p M M tO Ln M to M N Z N O O N t0 N Z N M V M tD N M N N
= C
3 I* M r! O ri I O ri O? V
* Ln M N M N Ln v v m m N N Ln Ln M
O r, r, N \ N N 6 Z Ln IT qT M M M M M rn m V Ln ?o N N
0. ; I?
? n ?
? n N N N ko N N N N N N rl% n n n N N N N N N N
? la ? t0 ?D ?D tO ?O tD ?O ?0 t0 tD ?D ?D ?0 ?0 ? t0 t0 t0 LD ?0 cO

yW
m
?-+ t0 00 10 01 .-i Ct Op N tO Ln N W N M N r4 O v-4 O N .-I N N
O M Ln N Ln 111 N Ln N N r4 O 111 O O 4 M M C6 O1 Ol q N N W
^
1 Ln Ln Ln vi Ln ui v; l Ln lD ? n O m m (3% 1 01 m N NN b un
ul
U.
O O O O O O O O M Ln N m T v ko 00 0 N r4 Ln IS O) .-? M
.-1 N M V 0 Z n N n n n O N M O O O 04 M O1 OM ON O O
m O> r-I r1

H
I
1

I cm

O
'
C
O
2
914
' L
R
O

C
O

v
C7

N
IA
O

U
R

A
O

L
7

1p
O
.Q
lC
H
1

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
OO OO CO OO OO OO CO CO OO OO CO CO CO CO OO OO OO CO OO OO OO C0 00 00
_ tD LO tD ?0 tD z LD z LD z z z to Q co z LD tD tD z tD ?D t0 t0
E
?

\ C rn
y O
0+ ?
O
aJ
0
a
O )
?
Z ° -
o -
o w
I- L
u L
u
00 00 N N 00 00 (Z
O r, r i r, ri ri 'i ,-a
L O. N N N N N N N

++ is
lp ? tD tD t0 tD t0 tD tD
3a
W
L
n Ln Ln N Ln r-i O
/?
.
W N N N d' ri
W 0 0 0 0 0 0

Q W

N N M M M N Ln Z N M M N d' M N 0) N .-1 c0 M Lr1 I? .-1
_ = N .1 +-4 0 M Ln M N t0 t11 tt d .-,4 r, r G7 Lq C1 to m O N
OO LA LA Lr Lr1 d' M M N rt l ri N r4 N N N M M 4 LA ur ?6 6
O ?;,, I? n ? n N n ? n n n n N c0 I? n n n N n n ? n n ?
? ? to c0 c0 LO LO LD t0 t0 L0 tD tD t0 t0 tD ?D LD LO ?D ?D c0 t0 L0 t0

C7

m
L[1 ,-i co 00 00 N N r-1 Z d' C' Ln N 't N M Ln Z +-i t0 'Rr N N tD
C ? 0 ri In Lr ll O r? n M M M Un O ?t I* M Ln 01 d- rr UL
^ Ln Lri n Ln t0 N M 00 00 00 M M N LD to V I- M
L

LL
0 0 0 0 00 O N d' t0 M O N ?t t0 O n O N tt Lp CO O N M
*-l N M M a" V V 'T Ln Ln Ln Ln M a6 z 0 'D l0 0 N N N
v Ln

I'-
I
LI
Appendix 4.A. -d
Longitudinal Profile
p. 11
M/
4- 0
,w
IMM
gg?g
?J
AA
KU
9
Q
T-
0
0
N
T-
0
c
(D
4-4
U)
0
Q/y?
00
Q
11
v
d
tX
'v
Al
d
a
4-
O
w
ILJ
.5 ¢+
co 5
f? QO
i
< Ll7
a) <
®! a)
t0 ?
W
C
c\j
N
cu 1
u
M
ml CU
a
m
Ca
U
GS
d
a
v
v
a
0
rn
s
's
s
a?

r- N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
X41 u01leA@13
0
0
0
N
T
m
I
fv
0
rz
0
J
'i
O
?C
O
Z
f4

C N
O
E
0- cif
O ?
N O
.4-
O ?
C6
N ?
d
L1
r n) ir: '?:
10 U 0.
ll ?_ If
it III II) (f
nl ICI G:

Appendix 4.A.-e
Logitudinal Profile Table
p. 12
Table 1. Longitudinal Profile Data; Year 1 Monitoring

STA Water-
Elev. Bed
Elev. Water
Depth
COM
FS
HI
0 671 670.36 0.64 13.29 683.65
20 671.74 671.3 0.44 12.35 683.65
44 672.07 671.63 0.44 TOR 12.02 683.65
59 672.13 671.19 0.94 12.46 683.65
94 672.1 671.48 0.62 12.17 683.65
100 672.11 671.43 0.68 BOR 12.22 683.65
115 672.16 671.63 0.53 12.02 683.65
131 672.24 671.72 0.52 TOR 11.93 683.65
156 672.31 671.3 1.01 12.35 683.65
181 672.29 671.41 0.88 12.24 683.65
195 672.29 671.44 0.85 BOR 12.21 683.65
220 672.36 671.88 0.48 11.77 683.65
236 672.36 671.94 0.42 TOR 11.71 683.65
261 672.44 671.69 0.75 11.01 682.70
273 672.43 671.71 0.72 BOR 10.99 682.70
298 672.55 672.15 0.4 10.55 682.70
310 672.6 672.05 0.55 TOR 10.65 682.70
335 672.62 671.66 0.96 11.04 682.70
356 672.63 671.94 0.69 BOR 10.76 682.70
381 672.73 672.18 0.55 10.52 682.70
394 672.81 672.22 0.59 TOR 10.48 682.70
415 672.83 671.94 0.891 1 10.76 682.70
428 672.81 671.95 0.86 BOR 10.75 682.70
450 672.93 672.4 0.53 10.30 682.70
467 672.97 672.45 0.52 TOR 10.25 682.70
492 673 672.15 0.85 10.55 682.70
507 672.98 671.9 1.08 BOR 10.80 682.70
530 673.11 672.75 0.36 9.95 682.70
550 673.34 672.89 0.45 TOR 9.81 682.70
575, 673.37 672.18 1.19 10.52 682.70
600 673.38 672.52 0.86 10.18 682.70
625 673.38 672.57 0.81 BOR 10.13 682.70
650 673.51 673.05 0.46 9.65 682.70
670 673.6 673.26 0.34 9.44 682.70
687 673.74 673.38 0.36 TOR 9.32 682.70
712 673.77 672.6 1.17 10.10 682.70
737 673.75 672.75 1 9.95 682.70
762 673.75 672.9 0.85 9.80 682.70
775 673.74 673.09 0.65 BOR 9.61 682.70
800 673.91 673.46 0.45 9.24 682.70
815 674.04 673.52 0.52 TOR 9.18 682.70
840 674.06 673.16 0.9 9.54 682.70
866 674.05 673.28 0.77 BOR 9.42 682.70
885 674.14 673.76 0.38 8.94 682.70
906 674.29 673.73 0.56 TOR 8.97 682.70
921 674.35 673.06 1.29 9.96 683.02
956 674.35 673.46 0.89 9.56 683.02
975 674.35 673.71 0.64 BOR 9.31 683.02
995 674.43 673.7 0.73 9.32 683.02
1010 674.49 674.16 0.33 TOR 8.86 683.02
1030 674.52 673.85 0.67 9.17 683.02
1044 674.53 673.9 0.63 BOR 9.12 683.02
1070 674.69 674.16 0.53 TOR 8.86 683.02
1090 674.74 673.91 0.83 9.11 683.02
1109 674.74 673.99 0.75 BOR 9.03 683.02
1125 674.94 674.43 0.51 8.59 683.02
1146 675.22 674.82 0.4 TOR 8.20 683.02
1171 675.24 674.19 1.05 8.83 683.02
1185 675.25 674.47 0.78 8.55 683.02
1200 675.25 674.2 1.05 8.82 683.02
1225 675.25 674.36 0.89 8.66 683.02
1250 675.26 674.73 0.53 8.29 683.02
1269 675.25 674.77 0.48 BOR 8.25 683.02
1290 675.45 675.1 0.35 7.92 683.02
1315 675.6 675.21 0.39 TOR 7.81 683.02
1340 675.66 674.55 1.11 9.67 684.22
1365 675.65 674.32 1.33 9.90 684.22
1390 675.66 674.37 1.29 9.85 684.22
1410 675.66 675.02 0.64 9.20 684.22
1431 675.68 675.08 0.6 BOR 9.14 684.22
1450 675.76 675.24 0.52 TOR 8.98 684.22
1470 675.79 674.73 1.06 9.49 684.22
1479 675.8 675 0.8 BOR 9.22 684.22
1500 67539 675.31 0.58 8.91 684.22
1517 676.02 675.57 0.45 TOR 8.65 684.22
1540 676.04 675.11 0.93 9.11 684.22
1552 676.04 675.25 0.79 BOR 8.97 684.22
1575 676.22 675.74 0.48 8.48 684.22
1594 676.52 675.77 0.75 TOR 8.45 684.22
1620 676.53 675.52 1.01 8.70 684.22
1645 676.53 675.7 0.83 8.52 684.22
1670 676.52 675.47 1.05 8.75 684.22
1680 676.54 675.95 0.59 BOR 8.27 684.22
1705 676.55 676.13 0.42 8.09 684.22
1730 676.64 676.31 0.33 TO 7.91 684.22
1755 676.66 675.44 1.22 8.78 684.22
1780 676.65 675.23 1.42 8.99 684.22
1800 676.65 674.86 1.79 9.36 684.22
Appendix 4.A.-f
2006 Plant Monitoring Data Tables
p. 13
Table 7. Vegetation Monitoring Survey Data, Year 1 Monitoring
Planted Species
No. Planted No. Survivors No. Volunteers
1 Black cherry 39 25
2 Black um 100 25
3 Green ash 205 205 123
4 Ironwood 39
5 Persimmon 206 45
6 River birch 222 222 63
7 Sycamore 90 90 241
8 Scarlet oak 25 14
9 Swam chestnut oak 45 18
10 Water oak 100 72
11 Willow oak 100 100 64
12 Yellow poplar 329 179
Volunteer Species
13 Black walnut 3
14 Black willow 1
15 Box elder maple 81
16 Elm 2
17 Red maple 5
18 Sweet um 39
Totals = 1500 995 622
Survivors plus Volunteers = 1617
The planted trees have a 66 percent survivorship, however, when the survivors are added to
the volunteer count the number of trees now present exceeds the number planted.
The buffer requirement is 320 trees per acre. With the buffer at 4.86 + acres,
the requirement is one thousand five hundred and fifty five trees, ±. The current count
exceeds the required number of trees.
The stream banks are well vegetated as are the coir fiber logs. The live stakes show good
survivorship but will need a year or so more to begin to do well.
Appendix 4.B.-a
2008 Photostation Photos

p. 14

f••iv
,140
e*+-std" "`
?t r dffn
I y,
y t 't €' ?5 t S. 4
'klMr rgi3 stk,?4S,p ?,al 4
}
Photo I. Photo Station L Looking do :tinstreani at lo-wer tie-iii.
+ 1 4 h7r, ?
, fK
*wl
r.n
r.M n ry ?' X.. 1
f
r + \ 1-:1
k $ R
r 1j?
LOA,
S r
? •'i t tea,
> ? -A x,14 ,g e F 1 l???4 ? ,?w e+
F .L fir, ..,? r
Photo 2. Photo Station 1. Looking upstream.

!A
A' +k ti «
dh' y
r (.f1 •
a
t
i

F
y

k m.:

{
s ? y
a 1
r
.. ' ,. l sY _ rr
Xe
=f
f° f
t ,
r fir,{l
} 8V
#1 '• r b
i
E £i
4
r
Photo 4. Photo Station 2. Looking upstream.
Photo 3. Photo Station 2. Looking downstream.

44,

14
.
i ?3 #p d
M

e

. s
e a.u
Photo 5. Photo Station 3. Looking downstream.

7 .µ 51 } Q
d .p? T• u .. $ S4
#iS s
R
i
A
41

,
' i
.
i

y.:. - : s T ,.F .$:.
'
t .
A, i,
Photo 6. Photo Station 3. Looking upstream.
41
k- -nA #1
r y t - ''
s x
i 4-1
r
„ g , ms?.lrr, ? ? _ ? ter.
ht
'a Kos^'r,° r a ` rt tw
Photo 7. Photo Station 4. Looking downstream.

II
I#-:4

di-

Photo 8. Photo Station 4. Looking upstream.

u
c
•? ?A) r '? ?`?i ? ?.jj?b .wit .
1 a s 4 4
00-
Z a t i r a, ?x;i si'! T J y? ,'4r d t ,r. r
•'y? YY? `.i r?4 ?..W rJ!. .Sv.PJafieslG• '-.+
Photo 9. Photo Station 5. Looking downstream.

=zx _
ar.,
a;
,V 4W,
31
a u ? ,
Y .dpi`
,,yyyb d 3.*s oS. '?
Y
?`F "??t k F t
V, ?x r 4 s`a
3 s
? d4???Y!!! a pt' r yIj TV V
n P °? liafi ?4 kt a Y?,'' t ryra• a t" ?.
Photo 10. Photo Station 5. Looking upstream at upper tie-in.

??, - wiii
14.
"
T
?i ?x r a 4 .Mm r ,fir . '• S v r}p,.•fi r `.lam" f ,y?,+Y ,?$*' _ & i "p, r
ak; Photo 11. Photo Station 5. Over-aft vier. Looking doivnstrea:::, #:or:: Reedy Fork
Parkway.
i
-3,11i.il ant
e ..?• 1 ? tide

1 E??df0.? ? .:Y
T'
Photo 12. Beaver dam at about longitudinal profile station 46+00. Removed.

't A

d?
tl # d
Y

i `

h
. ja
Photo 13. Lxarrlplc of impact to plantings by motor vehicle traffic within preserve
Photo 14. Example of damage to plantings by motor vehicle traffic within preserve.
N R t IF w +* w -? w
s
at \
?.
N -
!Wti
Photo 15. Kercnes scale insect infestation on Willow oak.
Appendix 4.B.-b
2008 Cross Sections
p. 1
c?
a?
U)
a?
1.
L)
O
O
O
00
O
CD
N
C
(6
O
v
O
N
r4
s?
a?
y
O
O
O
O
O
CO
N
U
cri
_N
cl
0
v
O
N

c?
as
pp??
i
I
I
m
o
1
1 ? ?

O G)
U
w U
-
O C? (n
i
C
J ca

7 cn

t?
Q
O -
O Q
C3
Cl) M

co ?- } C) LO.?
L
U

Q cu
1 to C'
=
cc

i U
u

=3 11 ? I
CD
CD V3 to
m
cc
J
O
U
cu
N
? -?
m
N cc
Yom- -
Q C./5
1,

CD 1
O c>
c>
W
1I1 ? ? j
LO E
T C°
Ls)
U
O U
N ca w
t ?5
U-1 N
a
c °o
J
00 m
Q AR (
g?
Z
L
W i-
'a
fy IF? ?? ? I
CF) In d 4f) O O LC) O LO 00 In O Ln O O
0
CD 00 CO I- ? 0*) OD OD F` r 00 Oo I` n
CD co CD co CD (D (D (D CO (D (D (D CD
(4) UOIJenal?] (4) u01jena13 (4) u01lena13
iJ
V
y
O
/L
V

6.3

til
A

Q
?
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
U
RS

0
°
v
O
N
O
co 0) 00 00 1-- P-
c0 co cD
(4) U01lena13
°
co
O
O
U
U
C
00
0
T
N U
U ?
Cn (n II
C, cc
J
3
O1 cn
O O
++ u C>
U
M M Cry
ca m cn
r r cn N
O
V
i-J
L
Q
O
M
L
a? v ca
U
cu L
N
L
ca c
J I
O1 CD
C C
O _0
O
M CL)

'ai ca_
N C
N
E

° O C
? O

c
cv
0
1

T CO
C) E
N
N
U N
U

_
N Cn
_C3 N ?
l
co cu
Op do
Q

I
f
O
00 00 r*-
CD (0 (D (o (D '.
r 1? L,
(4) U01}enal3 t ? x ? !

Appendix 4.B.-c
2008 Cross Section Tables
p. 16
REEDY FORK
Cross-Section # 1
(Inflection)
1

1
1
Fil

John Soule/Lisa Chisholm
April 15, 2008

STA

ft
BS(+)

It
HI

It
FS(-)

It Bed/Ground

Elevation
ft WATER

DEPTH
ft Water

Elevation
ft
Notes/Comments

TP # 9 5.81 687.06 4.26 681.25
0 7.63 679.43 To of Rebar, Ground level
5 7.84 679.22
10 8.00 679.06
15 8.04 679.02
20 8.02 679.04
25 8.06 679.00
30 8.04 679.02
35 8.09 678.97
40 7.90 679,16
45 7.85 679.21
46.4 7.87 679.19
48 8.42 678.64
50 9.00 678.06
52 9.08 677.98
54 9.34 677.72
56 10.05 677.01
58 10.51 676.55 0.00 676.55 Edge of water
60 10.70 676.36 0.10 676.46
62 10.89 676.17 0.28 676.45
63.8 10.79 676.27 0.20 676.47
65.8 11.04 676.02 0.42 676.44
67 10.78 676.28 0.18 676.46
68 11.06 676.00 0.46 676.46
69 10.57 676.49 0.00 676.49 Edge of water
71 10.02 677.04
73 9.36 677.70
75 8.48 678.58
77 7.38 679.68
79 6.54 680.52
81 5.28 681.78

1
REED' ERIC
Cross-Section # 2
(Meander)

1

John Soule/Lisa Chisholm
April 15, 2008
STA

ft BS(+)

ft HI

ft FS(-)

ft Bed/Ground
Elevation
ft WATER
DEPTH
ft Water
Elevation
ft Notes/Comments

TP # 7 4.09 684.72 3.18 680.63
0 5.24 679.48 To of Rebar, Ground level
5 6.22 678.50
10 6.90 677.82
15 7.24 677.48
20 7.22 677.50
25 7.08 677.64
30 714 677.58
35 7.18 677.54
40 7.1 677.58
45 7.12 677.60
49 7.20 677.52
51 7.62 677.10
53 8.24 676.48
55 8.64 676.08
57 8.90 675.82
58 9.06 675.66
59 9.46 675.26
60.5 10.10 674.62
61.9 10.28 674.44 0.00 674.44 Ede of water
63.2 10.90 673.82 0.62 674.44
63.8 10.94 673.78 0.67 674.45 Thalwe
66 10.80 673.92 0.52 674.44
68 10.64 674.08 0.38 674.46
70 10.46 674.26 0.20 674.46
70.4 10.48 674.24 0.20 674.44
70.8 9.40 675.32
72 8.86 675.86
73.2 9.12 675.60
74 8.80 675.92
76 8.18 676.54
78 7.58 677.14
80 7.08 677.64 Top of Bank, D

1
1

1

REEDY FORK
Cross-Section # 3
(Inflection)
John Soule/Lisa Chisholm
April 15, 2008

STA

(ft)
BS(+)

ft
HI

ft
FS(-)

ft Bed/Ground

Elevation
ft WATER

DEPTH
ft Water

Elevation
ft
Notes/Comments

TP # 2 4.75 682.25 5.11 677.50
0 5.50 676.75 To of Rebar, Ground level
5 5.69 676.56
10 5.76 676.49
15 5.93 676.32
20 6.03 676.22•
25 5.98 676.27
30 5.89 676.36
35 5.88 676.37
40 5.92 676.33
45 6.10 676.15
48.8 6.25 676.00
51 6.75 675.50
53 7.36 674.89
55 7.92 674.33
57 8.36 673.89
59 9.22 673.03
80 9.10 673.15
61 9.07 673.18
62 9.56 672.69 0.00 672.69 Ed a of water
63 9.63 672.62 0.22 672.84
64 9.88 672.37 0.48 672.85 Thalwe
66 10.11 672.14 0.16 672.30
68 9.79 672.46 0.00 672.46 Ed a of water
69.2 9.67 672.58
70 9.63 672.62
72 8.73 673.52
74 7.71 674.54
76 6.94 675.31
80 5.72 676.53 Top of Bank, END

REEDY FORK
Cross-Section # 4
(Inflection)

John Soule/Lisa Chisholm
April 15, 2008
STA

(ft) BS(+)

ft HI

It FS(-)

It Bed/Ground
Elevation
ft WATER
DEPTH
ft Water
Elevation
ft Notes/Comments

TMB #2 1.68 683.81 682.13
0 6.08 677.73 To of Reba r, Ground level
5 6.18 677.63
10 6.45 677.36
15 6.52 677.29
20 6.68 677.13
25 6.88 676.93
30 6.86 676.95
35 6.70 677.11
40 6.66 677.15
45 6.66 677.15
50 6.68 677.13
55 6.72 677.09
60 6.78 677.03
65 6.78 677.03
70 6.62 677.19
74 6.88 676.93 To of Bank
76 7.58 676.23
78 8.34 675.47
80 8.82 674.99
82 9.62 674.19
84 9.96 673.85 0.00 673.85 Edge of water
86 10.16 673.65 0.21 673.86
88.4 10.42 673.39 0.45 673.84 Thalwe
90 10.18 673.63 0.22 673.85
92.5 10.00 673.81 0.00 673.81 Ed a of water
94 9.54 674.27
96 8.50 675.31
98 7.66 676.15
100 6.86 676.95
102 6.04 677.77 To of Bank
103 5.96 677.85 END

REEDY FORK
Cross-Section # 5
(Meander)
John Soule/Lisa Chisholm
April 15, 2008
STA
(ft) BS(+)

ft HI

ft FS(-)

ft Bed/Ground
Elevation
It WATER
DEPTH
ft Water
Elevation
ft Notes/Comments
BM#1 0.65 684.05 683.4 steel in in tree
TP # 1 4.18 682.61 5.62 678.43
0 7.16 675.45 To of Rebar, Ground level
5 7.22 675.39
10 7.33 675.28
15 7.28 675.33
20 7.29 675.32
25 7.35 675.26
30 7.34 675.27
35 7.42 675.19
37 7.45 675.16
39 7.51 675.10
41 8.12 674.49
43 8.63 673.98
45 9.16 673.45
48 9.96 672.65 0.00 672.65 Edge of water
48.2 11.10 671.51 0.70 672.21
50 11.52 671.09 1.14 672.23 Thalw
52 11.38 671.23 1.00 672.23
54 10.95 671.66 0.56 672.22
55 10.72 671.89 0.32 672.21
56.5 10.39 672.22 0.00 672.22 Edge of water
57 10.09 672.52
59 9.85 672.76
60 9.1 673.42
62 8.85 673.76
67 7.56 675.05
70 6.71 675.90
73 5.73 676.88 Top of Bank, END

Meander at mid-point of Curve 17
' 0+00 to 0+73 Azimuth = 143 degrees

n

7

1
Appendix 4.8.-d
2008 Longitudinal Profile
p. 17

4mi
N
C
® .®
++
4
/e
00)
LL c
J
N??y

f /

i
I
I
i \
r
i
it

?

I1;
f
r
`?
e ,
I I
hh /

a, ?r C
V
f
+?

1 r11
\

II ? r

r l ???

t

f

i 1
1
I
i
--Now
V
a
o?
aC
v
o?
L

Q
N
cl
4-
O

O w

O
O
N
r
n
V
c
M
O
W
0
It
C, co
Q
>
J ?
L. ?
N ?
cu (1)
i
I
I
0 /n
O 0
N
> N
cA
G
a)
>
J ?
? J
QO
0
C) OD
0
N 0
0
>+ N
m
>
J ?
N
(0 7C)
s
V
d
til
N
L_
D
a.
W
O
61
As
31
m
}
0 --- - O
00
O
O
N
a
?o
N
_O
O_
CQ
C
C
O
J
O)
C
O
c
0
M
I .-
cu

c 4-
E
N
O c
O
D ?
O ?
E
T co
a>
r cn
rN,
C
.?1
r
ow
0
a ?
i
?n a? n
?' Ul U1 G'
P (0 tt M N r- O O
P P P P P P P P co
O O O O O 0 O O O
(4) U011MID

Appendix 4.B.-e
2008 Longitudinal Profile Table
p. 18

John T. Soule, Lisa Chisholm
n

1

n

Reedy Fork
Longitudinal Profile
4/25/08
STA

ft BS(+)

ft HI

ft FS(-)

ft Bed/ Ground
Elevation
ft Water
Depth
ft Water
Elevation
ft Notes/ Comments

BM # 1 0.79 684.19 683.40 PP spke in base of 24" W ltcw oak
0 13.91 670.28 0.98 671.26 BOR
20 12.81 671.38 0.34 671.72
46 12.65 671.54 0.60 672.14 TOR
73 13.29 670.90 1.26 672.16
91 13.02 671.17 1.00 672.17
117 12.72 671.47 0.70 672.17 BOR
149 12.49 671.70 0.56 672.26 TOR
156 13.20 670.99 1.26 672.25
175 13.32 670.87 1.36 672.23
198 12.58 671.61 0.60 672.21 BOR
241 12.42 671.77 0.66 672.43 TOR
262 12.66 671.53 0.90 672.43
282 12.21 671.98 0.40 672.38 BOR
316.5 12.39 671.80 0.76 672.56 TOR
TP#12 9.45 683.25 10.39 673.80
337 12.27 670.98 1.60 672.58
363 5.44 677.32 11.37 671.88 0.70 672.58 BOR
399 11.21 672.04 0.70 672.74 TOR
405.5 11.46 671.79 0.98 672.77
434 11.40 671.85 0.90 672.75 BOR
471 11.11 672.14 0.80 672.94 TOR
490 11.74 671.51 1.44 672.95
515 11.03 672.22 0.68 672.90 BOR
555 10.51 672.74 0.56 673.30 TOR
587 11.32 671.93 1.38 673.31
TP#13 4.25 683.62 3.88 679.37
TBM#2 1.51 682.11 Out 0.02)
TMB#2 1.53 683.66 682.13 * Ad' in office
632 10.93 672.73 0.66 673.39
642 10.84 672.82 0.58 673.40 BOR
693 10.26 673.40 0.38 673.78 TOR
703 11.25 672.41 1.40 673.81
729 11.52 672.14 1.68 673.82
788 10.46 673.20 0.60 673.80 BOR
825 673.53 10.13 673.53 0.46 673.99 TOR
TP # 14 7.20 5 683.00 7.86 675.80
842 10.18 672.82 1.18 674.00
878 9.52 673.48 0.58 674.06 BOR
915 9.20 673.80 0.50 674.30 TOR
933 10.08 672.92 1.40 674.32
948 9.79 673.21 1.10 674.31

John T. Soule, Lisa Chisholm
0
u

1
Reedy Fork
Longitudinal Profile
4/25/08
STA

ft BS(+)

ft HI

ft FS(-)

ft Bed/ Ground
Elevation
ft Water
Depth
ft Water
Elevation
ft Notes/ Comments
983 9.33 673.67 0.62 674.29 BOR
1021 8.99 674.01 0.46 674.47 TOR
1027 9.31 673.69 0.78 674.47
1039 9.11 673.89 0.56 674.45
1049 9.16 673.84 0.64 674.48 BOR
1077 8.94 674.06 0.60 674.66 TOR
1093 9.27 673.73 0.94 674.67
TP#15 8.72 685.04 6.68 676.32
1120 10.76 674.28 0.46 674.74 BOR
1154 10.19 674.85 0.40 675.25 TOR
1180 10.92 674.12 1.16
1200 10.74 674.30 0.96 675.26
1227 10.95 674.09 1.16 675.25
1276 i 10.26 674.78 0.48 675.26 BOR
1326 9.92 675.12 0.50 675.62 TOR
TP#16 7.16 684.12 8.08 676.96
1362 9.74 674.38 1.20 675.58
1418 9.36 674.76 0.84 675.60 BOR
1441 8.93 675.19 0.46 675.65
1461 8.81 675.31 0.46 675.77 TOR
1475 9.22 674.90 0.86 675.76
1491 8.75 675.37 0.40 675.77 BOR
1531 8.61 675.51 0.50 676.01 TOR
1544 9.15 674.97 1.06 676.03
1566 8.74 675.38 0.64 676.02 BOR
1604 8.14 675.98 0.50 676.48 TOR
TP#17 6.59 684.45 6.26 677.86
1642 9.04 675.41 1.10 676.51
1692 8.42 676.03 0.48 676.51 BOR
1746 8.20 676.25 0.40 676.65 TOR
1758 9.19 675.26 1.15 676.41
1795 9.64 674.81 1.86 676.67 END
TP#18 5.03 684.38 5.10 679.35
TP#17 7.04 684.89 6.53 677.85
TBM#2 2.76 682.13
1
1
1

1
r

1
1

Appendix 4.B.-f
2008 Plant Monitoring Data Tables
p. 19
The Villages at Reedy Fork
Stream Mitigation Site
Tree Survivorship Data.
2008
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Planted Species
No. Planted No. Survivors No. Volunteers
1 Black cherry 39 12
2 Black um 100 17
3 Green ash 205 261 68
4 Ironwood 39 24 52
5 Persimmon 206 23
6 River birch 222 229 80
7 Sycamore 90 91 995
8 Scarlet oak 25 11
9 Swam chestnut oak 45 19
10 Water oak 100 55
11 Willow oak 100 157 1
12 Yellow poplar 329 89 33
Volunteer Species
13 Baccarhus 3
14 Black willow 8
15 Box elder maple 76
16 Button bush 1
17 Elm 8
18 Flowering Dogwood 22
19 Hibiscus 55
20 M rica 11
21 Pine 12
22 P rus 2
23 Red maple 46
24 Silk willow 15
25 Sweet um 260
26 Tag alder 29
Totals = 1500 988 1777
Survivors plus Volunteers = 2765
The planted trees have a 66 percent survivorship, which is the same as the last monitoring.
However, when the survivors are added to the volunteers, the number of trees now present
exceeds the number originally planted.
The buffer requirement is 320 trees per acre. With the buffer at 4.86 + acres,
the requirement is one thousand five hundred and fifty five trees, +. The current count
exceeds the required number of trees.
The stream banks are well vegetated as are the coir fiber logs. The live stakes show good
survivorship but have been impacted by Beaver (Castor canadensis) in several areas.
Impacts are also ongoing due to unauthorized vehicle traffic.
Appendix 4.C.-a
2010 Photostation Photos

1

1

1
1
p. 20

;i
FA 1, -4:, 1
Photo Sta. 1, Photo 4 2. Looking upstream
Photo Sta. 1. Photo # 1. Looking downstream toward lower tie-in
h :.
F-I
3 photo Sta. 20 Photo 9 4. Looking upstream

Photo Sta. 2. Photo # 3. Looking downstream
.9

u
e a :.
,? ? ? - °'iY x .mss

T

gg?g! - ? `-x
x^A . .
Y t
f
x
3' $
f
of ,per L i't L
a' +
L
°
a
a
air
Photo Sta. 3. Photo # 5. Looking downstream 11

,2
y
DA.
'" ? f `` ?. a > may.
r
s:: dr x}p S,•
Photo Sta. 4. Photo TT 7 Looking downstream
L
rv
a

:, ft4
.

Photo Sta. 4. Photo 4 8. Looking upstream

Photo Sta. 5. Photo # 9. Looking downstream
]photo Sta. 5. Photo 4 10. Looking upstream toward upper tie-in
Appendix 4.C.-b
2010 Cross Sections
p. 21
?p ? 47 U
®
® ® 6 Y o
ca N

c c
® ® L-r) n ----------
cu
cc
I
a) ?
o r r
0 0
I
I I
I + !
O
4-J
N
U ? N
N
o
=5 14-
o
?

cc> - OG 0
cn C
a
a
f
J
•
C ??
O O
O p
M M In
L

ca C13 cu
N
? r
O

Cl) co `° co
5

U U

S.-

L.L ts
y
?,
v N {?
Cc
( 3 cn O p l
o o o V
a
C

4
?
Cf)
fi
i
f
I
I
N O U
i
l
i t
I
f?
I
j

? U ( i
U
U

,(
I
cn cn '? 1?1

i
--c3 w

O
CF

) 0

0 O
O
D r
? O
- I, o

-
O
a)

m
O t
00 t
o O
- rl
o O
- 0')
?
m
O
0
LO
0 1-
O
fl- N m
4
W c o c 0 c o ( C) ( C) W ( D ( 0 (0 ( D (0 W m m -?
(4) UO IJeAO S (4) Uo genal 3 (4) U0 1}en913 a Q
r ?
A

0
pp??
?? ??
Q

I
T
Q
? U
I CD Q
y-+

I

4

r

?
V

0

0
0
0
0
0
N
U
flS
Q
O
O
N
O LO 0- LO O o
0') 00 00 rl- I-
O O O O O
(4) U01lena13

v
U ?
I
t6
L ? O
7 ? r
v
a N

c _c ? I
o `o

Lr)
m C
0
o ,
? I

O I
4-J
C%5 I
I
v cvi to
o N
C) t
N
co -
o
cv w
J
.
o Cn
.o -o
I
O O ?
M: M: L.r)
M M L
L c

o
0

N -?
U I
C
C
4
U N E V)
w
Q
O
(n O
(n
W co
cu cu
: 1
C C L
L L >
?
I
W 4--
- Q) L/')
nt?

N
I
'( I
U
cts cu
w
?

L
cv ca
( y
o
co 00 rl I-
(0 co (D (D z
CP

(4) Uoilena13 < (n i_.
Q U)
C
"I
t
I d' U':
t
l
? ?!
yy
??
a
Appendix 4.C.-c
2010 Cross Section Tables
p. 22
REEDY FORK DEVELOPMENT
UT to Reedy Fork Stream Restoration
Cross Section # 1
ITC I c
6-Mav-10
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
De th Water
Elevation Elevation
I
0 5.75 94.25
10 5.94 94 06
20 6.03 93.97
30 6.13 93 87
40 6.00 94.00
46 5.87 94.13
50 6.61 93.39
55.2 6.53 93.47
60.2 8.83 0.00 91.17 91.17 Edge of Water
63 9.07 0.30 91.23 90.93
67.6 9.21 0.45 91.24 90.79
71 8.79 0.00 91.21 91.21 Edge of Water
75 6.89 93.11
79 4.95 95.05
81 3.71 96.29 END
REEDY FORK DEVELOPMENT
UT to Reedy Fork Stream Restoration
Cross Section # 2
a_nn?„_? n
Station BS H. 1, FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation

0 4.14 95.86
10 5.19 94.81
20 5.54 94.46
30 5.43 94.57
35 5.41 94.59
45 5.33 94.67
48 5.37 94.63
52 5.85 94.15
55 6.56 93.44
58 7.07 92.93
62.3 8.77 0.00 91.23 91.23 Edge of Water
65.5 9.11 0.40 91.29 90.89
68.5 9.15 0.45 91.30 90.85
70.8 8.75 0.00 91.25 91.25 Edge of Water
71.8 6.99 93.01
75 6.63 93.37
80 4.89 95.11 END
REEDY FORK DEVELOPMENT
UT to Reedy Fork Stream Restoration
Cross Section # 3
.ITS 1 r:
R-Mav-1 n
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
Frr,
0 5.58 94.42
10 5.82 94.18
20 6.06 93.94
30 5.96 94.04
40 5.96 94.04
49 6.32 93.68 To of Bank
51 6.91 93.09
56 8.01 91.99
60 8.22 91.78
61.1 9.50 0.00 90.50 90.50 Ed a of Water
65.8 10.14 0.70 90.56 89.86 Thalwe
70.7 9.49 0.00 90.51 90.51 Edge of Water
73 8.29 91.71
75 7.26 92.74
80 5.68 94.32 END
REEDY FORK DEVELOPMENT
UT to Reedy Fork Stream Restoration
Cross Section # 4
.ITS I c
F_Mn"_1 n
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation

Elevation
Xj
0 4.65 95.35
10 5.01 94.99
20 5.27 94,73
30 5.48 94.52
40 5.15 94.85
50 5.24 94,76
60 5.34 94.66
70 5.16 94.84
74 5.52 94.48 To of Bank
79 7.16 92.84
82 7.82 92.18
83.8 8.69 0.00 91.31 91,31 Edge of Water
87.6 8.92 0.25 91.33 91.08 Thalwe
91.8 8.86 0.00 91.14 91.14 Edge of Water
94 7.74 92.26
99.4 5.68 94.32
103 4.50 95.50 END
REEDY FORK DEVELOPMENT
UT to Reedy Fork Stream Restoration
Cross Section # 5
.Mq U.
C RA- In
Station BS H. 1, FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation

0 7.22 92.78
10 7,28 92.72
20 7.24 92.76
30 7.21 92.79
35 7.16 92.84
40 7.44 92.56 To of Bank
44 8.30 91.70
46 8.97 91.03
47.5 9.82 0.00 90.18 90.18 Edge of Water
48 10.50 0.60 90.10 89.50
48.5 11.34 1.60 90.26 88.66
50.5 11.60 1.85 90.25 88.40 Thalwe
52 11.35 1.60 90.25 88.65
54 10.94 1.20 90.26 89.06
56 10.75 1.00 90.25 89.25
58 10.11 0.35 90.24 89.89
59.2 9.81 0.00 90.19 90.19 Edge of Water
60.5 8.47 91.53
65.5 7.72 92.28
70 6.66 93.34
73 5.75 94.25 END
1
1

Appendix 4.C.-d
2010 Longitudinal Profile
p. 23
44
N
C 0
0=
ap`+
lei
A
YI
i
L
0
J
S
V
0
N
Ify
- d
L
C1
Q
d
DC
O
'O
s
w
0
0
N
r
U
c5
4-1
0
0
00
0
11
s
V
N
DC
d
L
.O
CL
d
DC
4-
O
s
s
0010-m
(0 0 (0 O
(4) UOIJBAGG

. y

i
l
i

F
4k w
i
P

i
I1

R?

•
\ Ilk

\

1
C
® A+
t

0

? Cam'
(D
1 r,
+r ?

cu
I et,
co

'
t

m ?
cp m
Q ?
N Q
> z
a) >
J N
L_ J
Q1 ?
m
i
i
O
O O
N 0
>+ N
co
cm
7 '
> 5
a) >
J a)
L J
a)
c6
co
co
O
® O
N O
(N
> 5
a) >
J N
J
cu
O
T o C)
TI-
C)
N N
A
>
J
i-
N J
}N
> co
I A
A
O
r
O
N
m
2
N
`+--
O
ri
CC
C
O
J
CM
C
L
O
O
c LO
L
/-
a?
QCn-
o ?
o
N ?
d ?
:cc
L G
O
E
T C13
N
N
-4.
:
Q !
J
RT. ,
n
R L? w I

Appendix 4.C.-e
2010 Longitudinal Profile Table
1
1

L
1
0

1
11
1
1

p. 24

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
STARMOUNT DEVELOPMENT
UT to Reedy Fork Stream Restoration
Longitudinal Profile
.ITS I_C
12-Mav-10
Station BS H. 1. FS Water
Depth Water
Elevation Elevation
=M `' ?6817l 6P,3,4. ` i Spka in H v w Oak
0 13.20 2.32 672.90 670.58
20 12.41 1.52 672.89 671.37
40 12.10 1.24 672.92 671.68
60 12.70 1.88 672.96 671.08
80 12.51 1.66 672.93 671.27
100 12.34 1.50 672.94 671.44
120 11.96 1.12 672.94 671.82
140 12.19 1.36 672.95 671.59
160 12.70 1.86 672.94 671.08
18
0 12.62 1.76 672.92 671.16
1
,i :#' 4 7,;z-,' J 7,j. f=.
193 9.48 1.24 672.89 671.65 Bottom of Riffle
213 9.28 1.04 672.89 671.85
233 9.35 1.14 672.92 671.78 To of Riffle
253 9.45 1.24 672.92 671.68
273 9.07 0.86 672.92 672.06 Bottom of Riffle Buried
293 9.18 0.88 672.83 671.95
307 9.54 1.30 672.89 671.59 To of Riffle
327 10.16 1.96 672.93 670.97
347 9.55 1.34 672.92 671.58
362 9.13 0.90 672.90 672.00 Bottom of Riffle
382 8.83 0.60 672.90 672.30
387 8.99 0.76 672.90 672.14 To of Riffle
'? #1 8" 37 3 73.23
398 9.90 0.96 672.93 671.97
420 9.55 0.58 672.90 672.32
424 9.62 0.66 672.91 672.25 Bottom of Riffle Sediment
444 9.38 0.42 672.91 672.49
459 9.48 0.52 672.91 672.39 To of Riffle
479 10.10 1.16 672.93 671.77
499 9.30 0.36 672.93 672.57
507 9.32 0.40 672.95 672.55 Bottom of Riffle Sediment
527 9.19 0.30 672.98 672.68
541 9.13 0.48 673.22 672.74 To of Riffle
561 9.52 0.90 673.25 672.35
581 9.53 0.90 673.24 672.34
601 9.15 0.52 673.24 672.72
:iG '..57 ;74. fit
620 9.25 0.42 673.26 672.84
640 9.21 0.40 673.28 672.88 Bottom of Riffle
660 8.88 0.32 673.53 673.21
666 9.57 1.10 673.62 672.52 At Beaver Dam Location
683 8.78 0.34 673.65 673.31 To of Riffle
703 9.19 0.76 673.66 672.90
723 8.90 0.50 673.69 673.19
743 8.84 0.42 673.67 673.25
763 9.11 0.70 673.68 672.98
783 8.88 0.50 673.71 673.21
i 4' 8.44 882 +36 ? 3i' 574.21
789 9.43 0.46 673.68 673.22 Bottom of Riffle
809 9.18 0.34 673.81 673.47
822 9.12 0.34 673.87 673.53 To of Riffle
842 9.65 0.94 673.94 673.00
862 9.45 0.74 673.94 673.20
878 9.26 0.58 673.97 673.39 Bottom of Riffle
900 8.86 0.30 674.09 673.79
917 8.90 0.40 674.15 673.75 To of Riffle
937 9.62 1.04 674.07 673.03

957 9.41 0.80 674.18 673.38
977 9.41 0.80 674.18 673.38
•
4
1
1
1
w

1

1

1
1

1
1
11
1

1

1
988 9.01 0.38 674.16 673.78 Bottom of Riffle
1008 9.00 0.48 674.27 673.79
1025 8.79 0.34 674.34 674.00 To of Riffle
1029 9.16 0.70 674.33 673.63
1049 9.01 0.56 674.34 673.78
1056 8.86 0.40 674.33 673.93 Bottom of Riffle
1072 8.58 0.34 674.55 674.21 To of Riffle
1084 8.83 0.58 674.54 673.96
1098 9.23 1.00 674.56 673.56
1120 8.91 0.66 674.54 673.88
1128 8.46 0.20 674.53 674.33 Bottom of Riffle
1162 8.08 0.42 675.13 674.71 To of Riffle
P #' 01 05 6135.44
1182 11.16 0.86 675.14 674.28
1202 10.96 0.58 675.06 674.48
1222 11.06 0.70 675.08 674.38
1242 11.28 0.96 675.12 674.16
1262 11.28 0.98 675.14 674.16
1282 10.83 0.52 675.13 674.61
1289 10.84 0.54 675.14 674.60 Bottom of Riffle
1309 10.53 0.36 675.27 674.91
1329 10.35 0.40 675.49 675.09
1333 10.17 0.20 675.47 675.27 To of Riffle
1349 11.07 1.20 675.57 674.37
T? # 20 3 38 679.64 9.88 5'5.7:;
1369 5.14 1.06 675.56 674.50
1389 5.63 1.56 675.57 674.01
1409 5.74 1.66 675.56 673.90
1429 5.17 1.08 675.55 674.47
TP # 2' 91.89 63 92 376 03
1436 7.07 0.70 675.55 674.85 Bottom of Riffle
1456 6.80 0.46 675.58 675.12
1477 6.43 0.24 675.73 675.49 To of Riffle
1485 7.23 1.10 675.79 674.69
1500 7.43 1.32 675.81 674.49
1512 6.71 0.60 675.81 675.21 Bottom of Riffle
1532 6.55 0.46 675.83 675.37
1549 6.21 0.24 675.95 675.71 To of Riffle
1569 7.17 1.26 676.01 674.75
T # 22 3.93 6 5.37 pH u76.4•.
1589 10.09 0.74 676.02 675.28 Bottom of Riffle
1609 9.47 0.24 676.14 675.90
1624 9.10 0.22 676.49 676.27 To of Riffle
1633 1020 1.36 676.53 675.17
1641 10.51 1.68 676.54 674.86
1661 9.90 1.06 676.53 675.47
1681 9.78 0.96 676.55 675.59
1700 9.65 0.80 676.52 675.72
1719 9.57 0.74 676.54 675.80 Bottom of Riffle
1737 9.38 0.54 676.53 675.99
1760 9.16 0.34 676.55 676.21
1782 8.87 0.18 676.68 676.50 To of Riffle
1800 9.37 0.78 676.78 676.00
'? # 23 53 584.84 g 1 , 670.2;
r # 24 3.93 683..583 24 579.6i

T? 9 23 '.4 ` 684.3 z 676.
3 -' # 27 2... J3 f8 6. AQ1 67
Sir' # ' 42 683.36 : G
i:i
1
1
1

1
I
C
i
0
1
n

1
1
Appendix 4.C.-f
2010 Plant Monitoring Data Tables
p. 25

Riparian Buffer Vegetation Monitoring

1
1

C'

1
Stem
Common Name Scientific Name Count
1 Black cherry Prunus serotina 2

2 Black gum Nyssa sylvatica 3

3 Black walnut Juglans nigra 15

4 Black willow Salix nigra 4

5 Box elder Acer negundo 52

6 Button bush Cephalanthus occidentalis 1

7 Flowering dogwood Corpus florida 4

8 Green ash Fraxinus ennsylvanica 220

9 Groundsel tree Baccharis halimifolia 1

10 Marsh mallow Hibiscus moscheutos 113

11 Honey locust Gleditsia triacanthos 1

12 Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana 8

13 Mimosa Albizia julibrissin 3

14 Pear Pyrus sp. 4

15 Persimmon Diospyros vir iniana 14

16 Pine Pinus virginiana 34

17 Privet Ligustrum sinense 1

18 Red cedar Juniperus virginiana 17

19 Red maple Acer rubrum 29

20 Redbud Cercis canadensis 1

21 River birch Betula nigra 368

22 Silk dogwood Corpus amomum 8

23 Silky willow Salix sericea 8

24 Sweet um Liquidambar styraciflua 483
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

25 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 464

26 Scarlet oak Quercus coccinea 14

27 Swamp white oak Quercus michauxii 2

28 Tag alder Alnus serrulata 6

29 Water oak Quercus nigra 27

30 Willow oak Quercus phellos 79

31 Winged elm Ulmus alata 14

32 Yellow poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 41
Total Stems 2041
Appendix 4.C.-g
2010 Miscellaneous Observation Data
p. 26
JO 1
L
wi
PAWWY
x
c
J
e®
V J
0
J
0
J

y
V
V 1

0

p

U

p
cl?
^
L o
U

y-
Q
L
=1 0
U

L

` 0
U

L

N c
0
U

0
2
0
C%:
Q

.?

¢
? nn

Q
o

Q
oLn
C

b?
0

i
0
x
G_
O
J
J
3
G
n
c
?a
C
i ?
O
J
0
J
0
0
c
0
9
O N
G
G
a
3
r
z?
U o
?o
aQ N
y
N
c-0
a
0
z?
n o v
c? J
I
0
0
ra
T
Lo
N
N
U
to
O
0
C
O
N
O)
N
O
co
CO
ca
?I I
I
c
d
Q CO
o c
ca
C
ti
I
I
?I
'I
L: ,
il] ?i fo?pp
_? 1,4x (1 tY,
I 'G C ? U I
'1

tb fit? *. h. ". p RAJ.
"?? £ S ¢ 1 ° .
f N
auI ;R}?
Iodise. Photo lF-1. Exposed geotextile fabric placed over soil plug in old abandoned
Channel at upper construction tie-in. Rock facade has been removed by flood waters.
8
Misc. Photo ddb-2 View of impacted riparian bank vegetation in zones backwatered by
previous beaver dams.

Misc. Photo RF-4. Beetle infestation and extensive die off of woody shrubs along stream
banks. Many shrubs were previously impacted by beaver-induced flooding and foraging.

x
Misc. Photo RF-5. Lowermost portion of restored reach with an incipient beaver dam under
construction at clogged pipe and rip rap stream ford. This is the dam responsible for existing -450 foot
long backwatered section seen in this year's longitudinal profile.