20201260 Ver 1_UPDATED 2019-02-11 JD_Package__20201112

April 4, 2019
David Bailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers- Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
919-554-4884, ext. 30
Re: Jurisdictional Waters of
the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNC McLeansville Readiness Center
(Approx. 111.9 acres)
Guilford County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Bailey,
Please find the enclosed Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package for the
NCNG McLeansville Readiness Center site. On behalf of the North Carolina National Guard,
Timmons Group is submitting this package to you in order to obtain a preliminary jurisdictional
determination confirmation of the delineation performed within the project study area.
Please review this enclosure and contact Chris Inscore at [phone] or
christopher.inscore(a�-timmons.com so that we may schedule a site visit to review the delineation
and confirm the jurisdictional boundary.
Sincerely,
Timmons Group
C-�
Chris Inscore
Environmental Scientist
Enclosure
CC Frank Slinsky

• � i
TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
Prepared For:
North Carolina National Guard
1636 Gold Star Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27607
NCNG McLeansville
Waters of the US Delineation Package
April 2019
Prepared By:
TIMMONS GROUP .rr"■�
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS. • ID ■
5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
www.timmons.com
Timmons Group Project No. 42866

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of the North Carolina National Guard, Timmons Group environmental scientist
Chris Inscore, AWB and environmental technician Morgan Gilbert conducted a field delineation
from January 15 through January 18 and on March 28, 2019 to identify potential jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands within the project study limits of the NCNG
McLeansville project (Site).
The Site encompasses approximately 111.9 acres and is in McLeansville, North Carolina,
within Guilford County. The Site is bound by Camp Burton Road to the north. To the west, the
Site is bound by Greensboro Urban Loop. To the east, the Site is bound by a forested upland area
and a cow pasture. To the south, the Site is bound by residential development and a forested area.
The western portion of the Site contains two stream features. The northeastern edge of the Site
contains a stream feature. Within the southern portion of the Site is a maintained transmission
line right-of-way. Approximately 90% of the Site is comprised of forested areas, while 10%
contains early successional growth contained within the maintained transmission line right-of-
way.
The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 030300020105) within the
North Buffalo Creek sub -watershed. The Site drains south to North Buffalo Creek via two
unidentified tributaries (UT) located within the Site limits. The Site does not contain a floodway
or 100-year floodplain according to NC FIRM Map 371078600J (map effective June 18, 2007).
The Site was delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual; the Regional Supplement to the
USACE Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0)
and subsequently issued USACE regulatory guidance regarding the identification of
jurisdictional stream channels through the recognition of field indicators of an ordinary high-
water mark within drainage features (Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE 2012; USACE
2005). In addition, streams were delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11). Using these methodologies, preliminary
delineation mapping was produced and is included along with the attached Site description and
discussion for your review. Flagging or marking of the WOTUS and wetlands boundaries was
conducted in the field during this effort. During our delineation, two (2) perennial stream that are
approximately 1,972 linear feet, five (5) intermittent streams that are approximately 628 linear
feet, twenty-one (21) Palustrine Forested Wetlands (PFO) that total approximately 3.8 acres, and
two (2) Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEM) that total approximately 0.4 acres were identified
within the Site.
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page i

WATERS OF THE U.S. DELINEATION PACKAGE
NCNG JFHQ Helipad
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................................... i
1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET............................................................................. 1
2.0
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 2
3.1 Site Location........................................................................................................... 2
3.2 Site Description....................................................................................................... 2
4.0
METHODS OF DELINEATION.................................................................................... 2
4.1 Preliminary Offsite Investigation/Data Review ...................................................... 2
4.2 Field Investigation.................................................................................................. 3
5.0
DELINEATION FINDINGS........................................................................................... 3
5.1 Preliminary Offsite Investigation/Data Review Findings ....................................... 3
5.2 Ofsite Determination/Findings............................................................................... 4
5.2.1 Jurisdictional Area Summary ......................................................................4
5.2.1.1 Jurisdictional Area Vegetation....................................................... 5
5.2.1.2 Jurisdictional Area Hydrology....................................................... 5
5.2.1.3 Jurisdictional Area Soils................................................................ 5
5.3.1 Upland Area Summary................................................................................5
6.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................7
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page ii

Appendices
APPENDIX A
USACE JD Request Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Request Form
Agent Authorization and Property Owner Form
APPENDIX B
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Hydrologic Unit Code Map
Figure 3
Environmental Inventory Map
Figure 4
Parcel Map
Figure 5
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 6
Preliminary Jurisdictional Water of the U.S. Delineation Map
APPENDIX C
Wetland Delineation Data Form (8 upland, 11 wetland)
NC DWR Stream Identification Form v. 4.11 (3 stream forms)
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page iii

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET
General
Project Name:
NCNG McLeansville
State:
North Carolina
County:
Guilford County
Latitude:
36.110004' North
Longitude:
-79.696942' West
Subject Property Size
HUC Code:
Nearest Named Stream
Corresponding Information
USGS Quad and NWI
USDA Soils Map:
Owner/Applicant
Name:
+/- 111.9 acres
030300020105 (Cape Fear River Basin)
North Buffalo Creek
McLeansville
NRCS Guilford County Soil Survey 1977
Guilford County, North Carolina
Rodney D. Newton, LTC
CFMO North Carolina National Guard
Address: North Carolina National Guard
Joint Forces Headquarters
1636 Gold Star Drive, Suite 2600 (CFMO)
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact: Rodney D. Newton, LTC
Consultant
Name: Timmons Group
Address: 5410 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Contacts: Chris Inscore
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the North Carolina National Guard, Timmons Group environmental scientist
Chris Inscore, AWB and environmental technician Morgan Gilbert conducted a field delineation
from January 15 through January 18 and March 28, 2019 to identify potential jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands within the project study limits of the NCNG
McLeansville (Site).
3.0 SITE INFORMATION
3.1 Site Location
The Site encompasses approximately 111.9 acres of land. The Site is located at 4250
Camp Burton Rd in McLeansville, North Carolina, within Guilford County (see Figure 1.
Vicinity Map). The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin (HUC 030300020105)
within the North Buffalo Creek sub -watershed. The Site does not contain a floodway or 100-year
floodplain according to NC FIRM Map 371078600J and 3710789500J (map effective June 18,
2007). The Site is in the Piedmont Physiographic Province.
3.2 Site Description
The Site contains mostly forested areas with a few sections of early successional growth.
There are two perennial and four intermittent stream features within the Site. Multiple headwater
wetland features were also found within the site. In addition, there is a maintained transmission
right-of-way within the southern section of the Site. Approximately 90% of the Site is comprised
of forested areas, while 10% contains early successional growth within the maintained
transmission right-of-way (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map). The Site is bound by Camp Burton Road
to the north. To the south, the Site is bound by residential development and a forested area. To
the east, the Site is bound by cow pasture and a forested area. To the west, the Site is bound by
Greensboro Urban Loop.
4.0 METHODS OF DELINEATION
4.1 Preliminary Offsite Investigation/Data Review
A review of publicly available resources was performed prior to the onsite field
investigation to determine if there is the potential for jurisdictional areas, and if present, the
extent of these areas located within the Site. These mapping resources generally include but are
not limited to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) maps, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soils database, and the U.S. Fish &
Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database.
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 2

4.2 Field Investigation
The Site was delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual; the Regional Supplement to the
USACE Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0);
and subsequently issued USACE regulatory guidance regarding the identification of
jurisdictional stream channels through the recognition of field indicators of an ordinary high-
water mark within drainage features (Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE 2012; USACE
2005). In addition, streams were delineated based upon the methodology outlined in the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11).
From January 15 through January 18 and March 28, 2019, jurisdictional feature
boundaries were flagged with consecutively numbered pink and black ribbon at approximately
50-foot intervals. An NC DWQ Stream Identification Form (version 4.11) was completed
adjacent to several stream features (ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial), providing
geomorphology, hydrology, and biology data for stream determination. Features identified in the
field were flagged and GPS located for the site.
5.0 DELINEATION FINDINGS
5.1 Preliminary Offsite Investigation/Data Review Findings
Based on a review of the USGS topographic map, elevations at the Site range from 692 to
772 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Two stream features are shown on the USGS topographic
map and the NRCS soil survey map as occurring within the Site (see Figure 1. Vicinity Map and
Figure 5. NRCS Soil Survey Map).
The NRCS soil survey identifies seven soil mapping units within the study area (Table 1).
All of the soil mapping units are listed as Non-hydric: Drainage classes within the study area are
well drained (ApB, ApC, CfB, EnB, EnC, and EnD) and moderately well drained (IrB).
Table 1. Soils in the studv area
Soil Series
Mapping
Drainage Class
Hydric
Unit
Status
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
ApB
Well drained
Non-hydric
Appling sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
ApC
Well drained
Non-hydric
Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent
CfB
Well drained
Non-hydric
slopes
Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
EnB
Well drained
Non-hydric
Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
EnC
Well drained
Non-hydric
Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent
EnD
Well drained
Non-hydric
slopes
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 3

Soil Series
Mapping
Drainage Class
Hydric
Unit
Status
Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Irg
Moderately well
drained
Non-hydric
5.2 Onsite Determination/Findings
5.2.1 Jurisdictional Area Summary
Twenty-three (23) jurisdictional wetlands and seven (7) jurisdictional streams were
identified within the Site. A summary of the jurisdictional areas identified onsite is provided
below in Table 2. Jurisdictional Areas Summary. The location and size of jurisdictional areas
delineated onsite are shown on Figure 6: Preliminary Jurisdictional Water of the U.S.
Delineation Map.
Table 2: Jurisdictional Area Summary
ResourceArea
Size
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 4

X
1,633
Y
4,053
Z
193
AA
8,475
AB
23,281
AC
6,817
AD
3,390
Notes: 1) PFO = palustrine forested wetlands, PSS = palustrine scrub -shrub wetlands,
PEM = palustrine emergent wetlands, R3 = upper perennial streams, R4 = intermittent streams, R6 =
ephemeral streams, and L.F. = linear feet.
2) Jurisdictional area acreages are preliminary based on field delineation and have not been confirmed
or surveyed.
5.2.1.1 Jurisdictional Area Vegetation
Forested wetland communities within the site can be characterized as Piedmont levee
forest that is dominated by Liriodendron tulipifera (tulip poplar), Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green
ash), Plantanus occidentalis (sycamore), Liquidambar styraciva (sweetgum), Carpinus
caroliniana (musclewood), and Acer rubrum (red maple) species within the tree and sapling
stratum. In the shrub stratum there is Ligustrum sinense (Chinese privet), Rubus argutus
(blackberry), and Pinus taeda (loblolly pine). In the herb stratum there is Polystichum
acrostichoides (Christmas fern), Juncus effusus (common rush), Carex stricta (uptight sedge),
Allium vineale (crow garlic), and Festuca rubra (fescue). In the vine stratum there is Lonicera
japonica (Japanese honeysuckle), Vitis rotundifolia (muscadine), and Smilax rotundifolia
(greenbrier).
5.2.1.2 Jurisdictional Area Hydrology
Primary wetland hydrology indicators observed within the Site included surface water
(Al), high water table (A2), saturation (A3), water -stained leaves (139), hydrogen sulfide odor
(C1), and oxidized rhizospheres on living roots (0). Secondary indicators include drainage
patterns (B10), crayfish borrows (C8), and geomorphic position (D2).
At the time of on -site field investigation, water tables were observed anywhere from at
the soil surface to down to 6 inches of the surface and soil saturation was observed anywhere
from at the soil surface to down to 4 inches of the surface.
5.2.1.3 Jurisdictional Area Soils
Hydric soil was identified within IrB, EnB, EnC, and EnD soil series.
5.3.1 Upland Area Summary
Most of the upland areas located within the Site are characterized as managed Pinus
taeda (loblolly pine) plantation (see Figure 3. Environmental Inventory Map). The majority of
the areas that contained wetlands were characterized as bottomland hardwood forest that
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 5

transitioned to pine plantation and mixed hardwood upslopes. Upland soils were typically dark
brown (2.5Y 3/3) and dark yellowish brown (IOYR 4/4) at 100% with within the first 4 inches of
the soil surface. The soils transitioned to a medium -dark brown (2.5Y 4/3) and light olive brown
(2.5Y 5/4) at 3-16 inches with a few traces of redoxomorphic features at strong brown (7.5YR
5/8). Soil textures were identified as clay loam, sandy loam, and loam. The mapped soils present
within the Site are depicted on Figure 3: Environmental Inventory Map. No indicators of wetland
hydrology were observed within the upland areas. The location and size of upland areas
delineated onsite are shown on Figure 6: Preliminary Jurisdictional Water of the U.S.
Delineation Map.
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 6

6.0 REFERENCES
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0).
ERDC/EL TR-10-09. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development
Center.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and
deepwater habitats ofthe United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and
Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
National List of Hydric Soils 2010, United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource
Conservation Service, hqp://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service
hLtp://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/Vp/
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory
hlt2://www.fws.gov/nwi/
Wetland Training Institute. 1995. Field Guide for Wetland Delineation: 1987 Corps of Engineers
Manual, Wetland Training Institute, Glenwood, NM, USA.
Waters of the U.S. Delineation Package
NCNG McLeansville
Timmons Group
January 2019
Page 7

APPENDIX A

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re alatoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
B.
C.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Southeast corner of 840 and Camp Burton Rd
City, State:
McLeansville, North Carolina
County: Guilford
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 7896305965
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Chris Inscore
Mailing Address: 4510 Trinity Road, Suite 102
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVrax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Chris Inscore
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
03/01 /2019
Date ^'
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 11 1.9 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
36.110004
Longitude:-79.696942
17 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I IxI7 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
F] Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hW2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro Qxam/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
�J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4M.mit/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hW2://www.saw.usace.4M.mit/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District'swebsite
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 04/4/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Chris Inscore, Timmons Group, 5410 Trinity Road, Raleigh, NC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Guilford City: McLeansville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.110004 Long.:-79.696942
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: North Buffalo Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): 01/15/19 - 01/18/19, 03/28/19
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See table 1: Table of Aquatic Resources

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

Table 1. Table of Aquatic Resources
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated Amount of aquatic
resource in review area
(square/linear feet)
Type of aquatic
resources (wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters
Geographic Authority to which the
aquatic resource "may be" Subject
(i.e section 404 or Section 10/404)
A
36.116703
-79.699403
1,729
Non -wetland water;
R3
404
B
36.114173
-79.699555
449
Non -wetland water;
R4 & R6
404
D
36.116696
-79.695008
243
Non -wetland water;
R3
404
E
36.116502
-79.694896
71
Non -wetland water;
R4
404
F
36.112850
-79.699985
58
Non -wetland water;
R3
404
H
36.110679
-79.695789
63
Non -wetland water;
404
1
36.117352
-79.698129
10,071
Wetland;
404
J
36.115896
-79.699560
453
Wetland; PFO
404
K
36.116408
-79.694750
1,977
Wetland; PFO
404
L
36.114080
-79.700180
1,426
Wetland; PFO
404
M
36.114035
-79.700541
721
Wetland; PFO
404
N
36.113758
-79.700529
1,460
Wetland; PFO
404
0
36.113963
-79.699285
540
Wetland; PFO
404
P
36.113848
-79.698255
1,715
Wetland; PFO
404
Q
36.113011
-79.700652
7,049
Wetland; PFO
404
R
36.112863
-79.699919
1,228
Wetland; PFO
404
S
36.112426
-79.695404
12,852
Wetland; PFO
404

T
36.111852
-79.696573
6,849
Wetland; PFO
404
U
36.111231
-79.695450
9,488, 448
Wetland; PFO &
PEM
404
V
36.109639
-79.695345
54,305
Wetland; PFO
404
W
36.110636
-79.698107
9,680, 15,433
Wetland; PFO &
PEM
404
X
36.112961
-79.696209
1,633
Wetland; PFO
404
Y
36.113882
-79.698748
4,053
Wetland; PFO
404
Z
36.115941
-79.699807
193
Non -wetland
waters; R4
404
AA
36.115602
-79.699968
8,475
Wetland; PFO
404
AB
36.116801
-79.698074
23,281
Wetland; PFO
404
AC
36.110032
-79.697742
6,817
Wetland; PFO
404
AD
36.109384
-79.697369
3,390
Wetland; PFO
404

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: 030300020105
■❑
❑ USGS NHD data.
■❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: McLeansville
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRcs Guilford county soil survey 1977
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI North Carolina 2018
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: 3710789600J and 3710789500J (eff. 6/18/2007)
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC one Map orthoimagery 2017
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

TIMMONS GROUP
YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION and
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
All Blanks to be Filled in by Current Landowner
The Department of the Army NCDENR — Division of Water Resources
US Army Corps of Engineers 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Wilmington District 1650 Mail Service Center
PO Box 1890 Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, current property owner designate and authorize representatives of Timmons Group,
Inc., to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc., from this day forward.
This the 14"' day of January, 2019.
(number) (Month) (Year)
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction tinder Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Project Name: NCNG McLeansville Reeional Readiness Center
Location: Camp Burton Road, McLeansville, NC
Property Owner's Name (Print): Rodney D. Newton, LTC
CFMO North Carolina National Guard
Property Owner's Signature: Z . ";)• )`
Property Owner's Mailing Address:
North Carolina National Guard
Joint Forces Headquarters
1636 Gold Star Drive, Suite 2600 (CFMO)
Raleigh, NC 27607
Property Owner's Telephone: [phone] Fax No. None
Property Owner's Email Address: Roduey.d.newton.mil(&mail.mil
a
a
0
u,

APPENDIX B

Path: Y:\805\42999-NCNG McLeansville Readiness Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42999-VIC.mxd
ti
� BURIpN RU.�"�
Site limits are approximate.
Topographic imagery from USGS. L__-
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Feet
NCNG MCLEANSVILLE RRC ADVANCE PLANNING SITE TIMMONS GROUP + • �'
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:42999 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S):MCLEANSVILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS: 111.9 ACRES DATE(S):2016
LATITUDE:36.110004 WATERSHED(S):HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.696942 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030002
These clans and associated documents are the exclusive crocertv of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in part and shall not be used for anv curcose whatsoever. inclusive. but not
imi[ed to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

X
7AlN
n a r A
"ea` f
ar YY�
Funr� ..
ktamar Lal " - - y:.
Li!p6k`
'
"
Pi—
PinesJ/
t
I
-
9i
r
I
Wnrk II
t`E
a
$°
ti G°nCwo
.•m
Lsr. Gi
1
tN'.Yi,s
n4
C tpK
�istlilina
a ¢ ,b�uw
�.
OF
C
g�
Creep
k`,.: If
03010102
Sweg.
Country
r
_-
1"anc-r'vlla
c
Gae
m4
`
,4 Club$;
��
m
n
Fr
J
�I �. ..
taYd
exbnro
L-P
r I ec
Leas4urg _.I
- -
r
a
�i= ^ C`ark:
5
Heed Greek
ck Fv
-
I ----- _ ._-_ -----
", r;.r�
M. °C
I
UI�
g3
LlSdu .o
atf er Bs Pn.h
d
re
creek
.. ikrrR�C
.:I,.I•.. II ,...--
4
I;
4ir°Creak
C
.
.I
R'4
'—
a
y,
Crrp°
r
7q var
03010104
h
r
s et
x F°,w Tor RrVe.
n o
G
"
I
I F x
� -• . !I orlon G
Fine Hail
�q-.
�
ob Greek
¢"'°
I __ __ _,. __..
Cre
P-
a
too
I
F1,7[
I
I
I
RideS..
G110
�aa~
.II. n s..;e
"`o^°k
-
-
:.' -.
03020101
03010103
.[ns
a,bla
I
,.. �
1 seurnrlarR
;
�fpyh,e�.
c
1y° ,
B
I
one c
l
r
I
I
- I yG Um - EfaW rE iYcr
- - - --- - - - - - - - --- - _ CASAFLl a
.v Relews Crack - - Stokz dak ., IJILFOFiD r6,v - _ _ _ _ _- _ _ (- _-
Puver AlI nMAi qF
I
i
i I' {tYver
u'° 1, 't{-9W. BUPternr!
. - Brorl r,s $Ulfl It 9 L!'e
9�S Meese F°rk
I _
'Svnn wrfield -
�� tx Bin
Park n Reoq,/ Fat"l.
u.r.Mr7 L
Park
E
Lei C'.r'°� _. leckle C"",° Gr r�"
, 4 f y i C
erne r-ilk -
11 - -,If.,: n!ed—tr
[hrl M1�Aryr A� - 03030002.1i ejDid Ce.I-
drug
03040101 Airp rl
- 42.! 7 - aa� kic Leahs,�[lle r,lhsrdr o illei
aP ` � � 9 Elon
Fialem . yc4 \ 08 -
take F'sd n Easi Forty p! n Y tk n Burlington
FMB 'ilry p Frie
swner s � �
�y r Greensboro Creek a^.mtsen
- .. iJ sham
C
_ Gulf Club C
i
.f
t..g5-�R e6 Ck F}acs Gre CUM reek
_ Ave
.s
Il
e, ostt•'RU%r e, Al, ma lr_.:
~7sA VICsr,%y _. __ '\ $ I S:;epsc•rr; it
E'edgefelq
.. + ell,..Club
lnat,r, lr
_ and rsrRa�rl L`°°
Co9f!71uh Sao v,
Forest Gals Cedarock
m-I .,n `r - _ °d. - ��'; park
I 47 4 t Po4
7,,rde.n YIXo b Qt etp'I
r Hi h Point f n tY yo� nitn e04 Hagen- ui` ci
'j Pa.,° CTeeh _ �l slnneY.nmP t'� y l
1\ B a as Q 'I"' 979
¢
P. If CANE CREEK MOUNrAiNs
I J'" dCra� �
C*
%hunts Forty ,%�',� As'clrlale �dr Creek
. irllYly - - Caer' C, eel,Stgw c,mp
Tikomasville I .. S C _
e. a l
Y�6 B.�/y��yfoY ak I •co n[y 'Py of sea. LteP -,
8°" ^S
i V
Noz 1 'lit
v
I �
- Lih, ty �
M ' ALAMAN't
y I Lta
�
%F e e
his -
r;.r,dlemon Rucgy
m.I r 7i°aunt Lf aav
° Matiet Sts b y
Ci
03040103 Gt 4� Creek �h
y cwsrcti.b
I � µ
J4 03030003
I .
ee
S FraDklincslt
G,, �. -_ _ _-:'..4:.,. Sher city.;
.i• ja.kson Cue f�
:AIL
Ache bnro .PTaL 81oaa RUn ..
MIN Gt:aek � 9' � lk.
slCity Meeda
a' -R Ff Country
4Cree
I Le° to Lr ' $
,r.cF Giae°rr I r,
I � J
O S
I c� taYlots r,1 �' [
0), Lr $ark Lraek c°
Tol Hill
ril:.R epY Fa Gall .9f r.
.. Glut.
!b rM c a raa.w •a
f] Iuabq- Park
I
I E.rk haa+l luh pa .. Bear Creek
wash Fofksecmd Creek Mountains
f' "In ,
GaeoC—* D.-1 03040104 Nat Creak
F Park,/ U W H A R R J E M D it N T 1 N S a
ti ra l
err ere aEr L r
l Ire Gr k Be nne It deck �Cr
I as
to
C Y
eaa U , G`
3� l� i lRCr2M1 G'f l'M
C!
a
6 I Hurdle Y:1i15
e
I p Libey. G
R-1ky C eek i G
I 4r
Gie° gpr+rs C"'h `lacks.,
iorgyo Cl
r it RA NGF _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _� _ __ _79t1n _ _. _ - _ _ - _ '+' eN
as J e
%
Gr.�ns f-reek I yortl+Folk ylrrle ':r•: E•
firer Ro upe Mont a -
don h
I it ¢'cry
a 8r Ste nl
L Occa neech .# o S$ Pytu°k G"`,.
n snw� salt_, ,y 's ` 80 h, m., C±
F �!
C I n �Fd
Cedar resa RrW r k+lhk "I °
'
I I �
I f I
Fnrres�Gr f _ ..
f - 6vrtivr
rAill ser + IJ
4" if L
Go 41 Treyturn
cou°4r
C Iffi
rt.� _ 03020201 r
�F
I
r.t b.l
¢dre o
rti urI E- Rrer ~
_ �RI' hlll5 tr•f9 Uln `+9kr FSrk F,IIg-
� r
i lcn c1Ai
"AN�[1f sdx+"Gte�
�ryP
,S
04
l `L5°ek, Gaie gtaRy, 7U .,,F _ _ - G.ra°y: !Fakls L.K.'&¢rla
A f Cr°ae lk >�.• 0--Ion Area
T f- GClud "Pa us Lake"
k I ti I ri:re Gf ae 8s 1
°n Groe - Umyerdq ... o !
s - Durham / Ito:
L
t o a Golf
Xew Cre'I' _ Falh. visage l
c,dca.,.
' `'• - ----- ---
Creel,
-- 1
7P'rf
g Clacks
Z!, I
' Sven e�
! ^ 1100ei o
r
I
North,
Loa'cr .'alto II
Chapel Hill r a , -
Vtor' Carrboro /' !'liner Creek C°
caunlry o "
Y- . - r co 1 ..,. y:; _. _ I i,S 4 •: _. club
_ v I
rWann.
Ridge,,
coan[nclut
Intl Airy-
. � _ ------�_ -_ - ---- �£°�' !' - - ---------"-Np -T- I ------ ,
WA.. B willian, B
.s Yak Greek "� Umao!r. i Umcrad
,k r{.. 4' _ %Yale ParA Sra to 4-
Palk
d Cork Governors old
Go li c lu b Nort h
r.Y. rlr.alk
,etrells G`°'n Lfek-
e; Indio"
ary Creek ,tl;,lkips�
lj Co.irtry' redsh
Goa Flub d[ _ .7 Cary
C ham l RcIge
and rl
q tA h,te Lypk C"! Park
r. 5 Gfp
9rooK e!4 ¢ -- swl.
ti Urn -rut,
Latle
Jchn r,
Pa*
Fr - _ -_� Country y
Ape
i[�ba ro '-��� $oaVe+ Creek rates khll
t andNm C,p,aPl R a`ena Jordan - Fb rid
-
a� yo
s� R F,•aretr laroreason 1
J as bx Creek,
1 Lits7o Be. -. ,
°ew
• Hdl n ,
ENle
O -
° Club ar f+.I*0 Got[
°'qJe Club
71 Oaks
f
Shad aa* G �efi I ly SY trg'.. Race'+ -
�aQ'FY &e �•.. I
flea! Creek. �
r
� :a.ea roar
> Howie
Coon[,.
Park
Legend
,.
03030004
Goldsto ll W.mhier+ Lr ..
B�.kn�°F Site Marker
fir, I 3`- - ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■
'eeorge& Cr � �" L ■
■ Haw (Cape Fear River Basin)
1
Ceder Cree,} - - ♦ 1 1 i ■ Y f t HUghes Gee,F , ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
ql . Hydrologic Unit Code
{� 41r �r ! Qcreek
IL
U7
cc
0
0=
L7 0
M
0 y
.) fnNc-4
=O E
~ M 014
4 V
LU > o 0
> R N E
Z
a o C'E
r
r�''
V = W
4
•
00X~
Z m
vo
(A�
PROJECT NAME & LOCATION
UN
W
�
�
Q
W
Z
Z
J
_
Z
J
>Z
U)
z00
U
Z
Q
Q
W
a
O
JW
0ILL
_
�
Z
J
O
Q
V
%
CD
Z
U0
Z
Q
DATE
02/ 18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
42999
PROJECT NAME
NCNG READINESS CENTER
DESIGNED BY/ DRAWN BY
L. WHEELER
NOTES:
Site marker is approximate.
HUC from USGS.
Topographic basemap from
Esri Online.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent ofTIMMONS GROUP.
REVISIONS
# I MM/DD/YY DESCRIPTION
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 2-
HYDROLOGIC
UNIT CODE MAP
Miles
O 6
PLANS PRINTED AS 1 1X17 ARE HALF SCALE
rLE SHEET NUMBER
H:
It = 3 Miles 1 1
1'AE:Zi1.yCy���E►[N►[!i �i[i7R Ti1[�RII[7:Z T.IR M- TOR04 • u u • 1
Shared Exhibits\42999-HUC.mxd

SOL"
- r4
Ae,
-
if
At7---
4hj
$0 SSW sft##4ft
•
4g�
lit
gift
I -MR
lee
t
" A-i
• DRO•
41.
7z
', f mll
04
..........
wo
Q e
a
ho
a d
LJ

Path: Y:\805\42999-NCNG McLeansville Readiness Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42999-Parcel.mxd
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Path: Y:\805\42999-NCNG McLeansville Readiness Center\GIS\Common Shared Exhibits\42999-NRCS�mxrcCo y
v
,n �•• ud�
4z s
En ApE
Wk E r"t
14
f
y i Site Limits
l �
EnF3 A,
' EnD
4
i
r I
tra
.' Iri
End
F
n
F ' '
•i
t
•.
Site limits are approximate.
Soils from NRCS web soil survey.
0 750 1,500 2,250 3,10
Feet
NCNG MCLEANSVILLE RRC ADVANCE PLANNING SITE TIMMONS GROUP
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 5: NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP YOUR VISION ACHIEVED THROUGH OURS.
TIMMONS GROUP JOB NUMBER:42999 U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE(S): MCLEANS VILLE
PROJECT STUDY LIMITS:111.9 ACRES DATE(S):2016
LATITUDE:36.110004 WATERSHED(S):HAW (CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN)
LONGITUDE:-79.696942 HYDROLOGIC UNIT CODE(S):03030002
These plans and associated documents are the exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and may not be reproduced in whole or in partand shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever, inclusive, but not
limited to construction, bidding, and/or construction staking without the express written consent of TIMMONS GROUP.

Zad+e D r
ft' 04",
�yfirl - as -
cc
f
� I
I I l
♦
n-:L-hy - _0 Keeley Park r A I
♦
001
e
N y�ri�
Resource
Confirmation
Resource
Identification
PFO
(sq ft)
PSS
(sq ft)
PEM
(sq ft)
POW
(sq ft)
R3
(If)
R4
(If)
R6
(If)
Ditch
(If)
Description
Notes'
A
B
1,729
243
206
NT/ NV
NT/ NV
C
D
E
243
71
29
NT/ NV
NT/ NV
NT/ NV
F
58
NT/ NV
G
240
NT/ NV
H
63
NT/ NV
I
10,071
NT/ V
J
453
NT / V
K
1,977
NT/ V
L
1,426
NT/ V
M
721
NT/ V
N
1,460
NT/ V
O
540
NT / V
P
1,715
NT/ V
Q
R
7,049
1,228
NT/ V
NT/ V
S
12,852
NT/ V
T
6,849
NT/ V
U
9,488
448
NT/ V
V
54,305
NT / V
W
9,680
15,433
NT/ V
X
Y
1,633
4,053
NT/ V
NT/ V
Z
193
NT/ NV
AA
8,475
NT/ V
AB
23,281
NT/ V
AC
6,817
NT/ V
AD
3,390
NT/ V
Total
167,463
0
15,881
0
1,972
628
475
0
Total Wetland Area =
183,344 sq ft
4.21 ac
Total Stream Length =
3,075 If
" T=Tidal; NT=Non-tidal; V=Vegetated; NV=Non-Vegetated; PFO=Palustrine Forested Wetland; PSS=Palustrine
Scrub -Shrub Wetland; PEM=Palustrine Emergent Wetland; POW= Palustrine Open Water; EIW= Estuarine
Intertidal Wetlands; R3= Upper Perennial Streams; R4=Intermittent Streams; R6 = Ephemeral Streams
Legend
Project Limits - 111.9 Acres
©
Stream Identifier
©
Wetland Identifier
p
Wetland Flag
$
Field Data Station
Perennial Stream (R3)
Intermittent Stream (R4)
Ephemeral Stream (R6)
Palustrine Emergent (PEM) Wetlands
-
Palustrine Forested (PFO) Wetlands
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub (PSS) Wetlands
-
Palustrine Open Water (POW)
.11 O..N n
. ,r .� r--c r•,, g 3
TOW
04
"IN
A*
iL
w r
J1 .JJI1
r
D7
IY
a
0
{J'
O
M
Q
y
=
fn N O
14
N0 V
0
10
LU
`F
i
�
W
co
R E
E
N p O
L 00
.
0
V
a
I.I..I
0X
m
!
0
O
in
O
F
O
UN
LrL
W
W
�
�
Z
Q
Z
J
_
>Z
Z
00
J
Z
Q
U
0
Q
W
JW
a
Ld_
0ILL
�
V
Z
Q
>
J
f0
V
Z
Uo
Z
Q
DATE
02/18/2019
PROJECT NUMBER
42999
PROJECT NAME
NCNG READINESS CENTER
DESIGNED BY / DRAWN BY
L. WHEELER
1. Waters of the U.S. within the
project study limits have been
located using submeter, Bluetooth
GPS antennas by Timmons
Group.
2.Waters of the U.S. have not
been confirmed by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers.
3. Project limits are approximate.
4. Topography based on USGS
Li DAR.
5. Cowardin Stream
Classifications are based solely
on field observations. No formal
Stream assessment methodology
was completed to determine these
Cowardin Classifications.
These plans and associated documents are the
exclusive property of TIMMONS GROUP and
may not be reproduced in whole or in part and
shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever,
inclusive, but not limited to construction, bidding,
and/or construction staking without the express
written consent ofTIMMONS GROUP.
REVISIONS
# MM/DD/YY DESCRIPTION
DRAWING DESCRIPTION
FIGURE 6:
WETLANDS AND
WATERS OF THE
U.S. DELINEATION
MAP
it f �6.
SCALE (FEET)
0 150 300
PLANS PRINTED AS 11X17 ARE HALF SCALE
4 Tv" SCALE SHEET NUMBER
..tea
fir
.1K 1 s� H:1 = 150
tA
42999-NCNG McLeansville Readiness Center\GIS\Wetland Delineation\42999-WTDM.nnxd

APPENDIX C

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32A5
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.109454 Long:-79.697483
Soil Map Unit Name: IrB - Iredell fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 1
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No
Remarks:
Upland point taken on forested slope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32A5-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4. Quercus alba
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7
.su r rHt,
25 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
1 n N FAr..1 I
5.
6.
95 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: 19
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 15 Y FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y FAC
3. Carpinus caroliniana 5 N FAC
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 15
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
iU = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
S V FAr
I u = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
F V FAr
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7
100
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2•5 20% of total cover: 1
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32AfM
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/4 100 SL
4-16 2.5Y 5/4 98 7.5YR 5/8 2 C M SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32A5
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.109310 Long:-79.697682
Soil Map Unit Name: IrB - lredell fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 2
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PFO wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
✓❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 6
4
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32A5-11\jj
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
60
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
(A)
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
10
N FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata:
5
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35
20% of
total cover: 14
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
15
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plat size: )
FACW species
x 2 =
1. Carpinus caroliniana
60
Y FAC
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
15
N FACU
FAC species
x 3 =
3. Quercus rubra
2
N FAC U
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
4.
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
5.
50% of total cover: 38.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Carpinus caroliniana
3.
4.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 15.4
nn V �Ar
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8 Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Carex stricta 5 Y FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2• Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 50 Y FAC
Lonicera iaponica 5 N FACU
3.
4.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
55
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 1 1 Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Ad
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/1 95 10YR 3/6 5 C M SL
6-16 10YR 4/1 70 10YR 5/8 30 C M SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32131
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.111857 Long:-79.696891 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _❑✓ No ❑. (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No _I v L
Upland FDS point taken in a forested hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32131-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Carya ovata
2.Ostrya virginiana
Z Acer rubrum
5.
6.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
60
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
10
N
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
10 N FAC
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
8
50% of total cover: 40
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Carya ovata 2
2. Acer rubrum 1
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 15
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Carpinus caroliniana 1
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 5
3. Elaeagnus angustifolia 5
4.
50% of total cover: 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20% of total cover: 16
OBL species x 1 =
0 Y FACU FACW species x 2 =
0 Y FAC FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
FACU species 100 x 4 = 400
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 135 (A) 505 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.74
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: 6 ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 Y FAC El - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Y FAC ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Y FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
cu = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 4
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
G V CA(-[ I
Z) = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
cu = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 4
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
G V CA(-[ I
Z) = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32BIb
to the depth needed to
or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 4/4 100 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
"Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32131
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.112408 Long:-79.695762 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _❑✓ No ❑. (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil = or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology,❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No _Q
Point taken within PFO wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
✓❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 3
1
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-321314ij
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Fraxinus Pennsylvanica
40
Y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Y
FACU
Acer rubrum
10
N
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
100
3.
Species Across All Strata:
5.
6.
7
50% of total cover: 35
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Fraxinus Pennsylvanica 1
2. Acer rubrum 1
a Platanus occidentalis 5
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 12.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60%
0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
20% of total cover: 14
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
0 Y FACW FACW species x 2 =
0 Y FAC FAC species x 3 =
Y FACW FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Zo = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 5
r, V �Ar
Z) = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2•5 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Allium vineale 2 Y FACU
2. Polystichum acrostichoides 2 Y FACU
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
4 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: 0.8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 Y FACU
2. Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
3.
4.
u = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32BIi
to the depth needed to
or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-16 2.5Y 3/2 95 5YR 3/4 5 C M SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
"Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
El
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32132
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.110636 Long:-79.697653
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 2
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑✓ Soil . ✓❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No
Remarks:
Upland point taken within transmission line right of way.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32B2-UP
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: NSA ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Rubus argutus
Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
50% of total cover: 27.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Festuca rubra
2.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 35
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
3.
4.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
An V FAf'.II
-I Y I-HtI
55 = Total Cover
20% of total cover• 11
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1
=
FACW species
x 2
=
FAC species 15
x 3
= 45
FACU species 110
x 4
= 440
UPL species
x 5
=
Column Totals: 125
(A)
485 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.88
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
- Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
70 Y FACU (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
70 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 14
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Bb
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/2 100 L
2-16 10YR 5/6 100 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32132
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.110542 Long:-79.698234
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 1
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑✓ Soil . ✓❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PSS located inside a managed transmission line right of way.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
✓❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑✓ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 /2
Water Table Present? Yes Q
❑
No = Depth (inches):
EL
Saturation Present? Yes
No = Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32B2-1Aij
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: NSA ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Rubus argutus 30 Y FACU
2. Pinus taeda 5 N FAC
3.
4.
155 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Festuca rubra 70 Y FACU
2, Juncus effusus 50 Y FACW
Z Carex stricta 15 N FACW
5.
6.
7.
10.
11. _
135 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 65.25 20% of total cover: 27
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
3.
4.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1
=
FACW species
65
x 2
= 130
FAC species
5
x 3
= 15
FACU species
100
x 4
= 400
UPL species
x 5
=
Column Totals:
170
(A)
545 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.21
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Bbi
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 2.5Y 3/2 100 SL
2-16 2.5Y 4/2 70 5YR 4/6 30 C PL SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
✓❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32C1
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.111184 Long:-79.695950 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnB - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _❑✓ No ❑. (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No _I v L
Remarks:
Upland point taken within upland forest. This FDS point is for FDS-32C1, D1, & E1 -UP
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32C1-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Quercus alba
3. Acer rubrum
A Carva ovata
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2
Zu r rHt,u
15 N FAC Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
in N FAf1.1 I
5.
6.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
2. Nyssa sylvatica 5 N FAC
3. Carpinus caroliniana 5 N FAC
4.
5.
iU = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Eleagnus augustifolia 5 Y FACU
3.
4.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 Y FACU
2. Smilax rotundifolia 2 Y FAC
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3%
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1
=
FACW species
x 2
=
FAC species 47
x 3
= 141
FACU species 80
x 4
= 320
UPL species
x 5
=
Column Totals: 127
(A)
461 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.63
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
7 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3•5 20% of total cover: 1.4
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Cd
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/2 100 L
2-16 10YR 5/6 100 SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32C1
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Backswamp Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.110060 Long:-79.695616
Soil Map Unit Name: IrB - lredell fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 0
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken in PFO wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3) ✓❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑✓ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches): 1
0
EL
Saturation Present? Yes= No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Trees are buttressed - morphological changes due to water.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32C1-11)jj
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Quercus laurifolia
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 52.5
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
60 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5
LU IV rAL,
20 N FAC
5 N FACW
105 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 21
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 20 Y
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Y
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 15
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
FAC
FAC
iU = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
i n v FAr.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Rosa multiflora 5
2.
5.
6.
7.
r,
50% of total cover: 2.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5
2. Lonicera japonica 5
3. Vitis rotundifolia 5
4.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7
71.4%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: 2
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Y FACU (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
Y FAC
Y FACU
Y FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
15
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7•5 20% of total cover: 3
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-32Cd
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/1
100
SiL
2-8
10YR 4/1
90
10YR 5/8 10 C PL SiCL
8-16
10YR 5/1
60
10YR 5/8 40 C PL C
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32C3
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.112907 Long:-79.700272
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 2
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PFO along drainageway.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑✓ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 1
0
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32C3-11)jj
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 4C' v PAr
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 2C
3. Liriodendron tulipifera 1C
4. Nyssa sylvatica 5
5.
6.
75
50% of total cover: 37.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Carpinus caroliniana 3C
2.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 15
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Carpinus caroliniana
3.
4.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6
r rrit�
N FACU Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8
ni �Ar
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 15
Y FAC
OU = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
�n V �Ar
u = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex stricta 5 Y FACW
2. Allium vineale 5 Y FACU
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
I G V CArl I
Zu = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32CIb
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 3/2 100 SL
8-16 2.5Y 5/2 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32C5
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.116495 Long:-79.697820
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 2
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PFO wetland along drainageway. Indicators questionable.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
✓❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 /2
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 0
0
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32C5-11�
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 50 Y FAC
2. Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
5.
6. _
7(
50% of total cover: 35
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 6C
2. Acer rubrum 1 C
a Prunus serotina 2
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 36
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 1
2. Pinus taeda 1
3. Acer rubrum 5
4.
50% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Pinus taeda
2.
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 14
Y FAC
N FAC
AI PA(`I I
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
7
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
85.7%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
= Total Cover
5
0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: 14.4
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Y FAC
0 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Y FAC
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
N FAC
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
ou = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
5 Y FAC
10.
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 50 Y FACU
3.
4.
Du = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Cf3
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 2.5Y 3/3 100 SCL
2-16 2.5Y 4/3 60 7.5YR 5/5 40 C PL SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32D5
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.115659 Long:-79.699790
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 0
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No
Remarks:
Upland point taken within floodplain of perennial stream feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32D5-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Fagus grandifolia
Z Prunus serotina
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 30
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
40
Y FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4
(A)
10
N FACU
Total Number of Dominant
10 N FACU
Species Across All Strata:
5
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
80%
(A/B)
60
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
20% of
total cover: 12
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 20% of total cover: ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
40 Y FAC 0 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
20 Y FAC ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
v
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
60 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
5
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Juncus effusus
10 Y FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Rubus argutus
10 Y FACU
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Carex blanda
5 N FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4. Rosa multiflora
2 N FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
27 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13.5
20% of total cover: 5.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
3.
4.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-32Df3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 SL
4-6 10YR 4/3 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C M SSi
6-16 10YR 4/4 100 S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32D5
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.115559 Long:-79.699846
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 0
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 1
0
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32D5-11)jj
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Platanus occidentalis
A Betula niara
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 37.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum
3.
4.
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex strlcta
2. Allium vineale
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 7.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
3.
4.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3
LU Y rAL,
10 N FACW
5 N FACW
75 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 15
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
in v FAr.
I u = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
10 Y FACW
5 Y FACU
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
60%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Df3
to the depth needed to
or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 3/1 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 C PL SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
"Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
El
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-321D-1
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.117360 Long:-79.698258
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): <1
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PFO depression.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 /4
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 0
0
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32D-WFd
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Y FAC
2. Pinus taeda 20 Y FAC
3. Platanus occidentalis 15 N FACW
4. Acer rubrum 10 N FAC
5.
6.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y
2. Acer rubrum 10 Y
a Cornus florida 2 N
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 16
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
50% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
FAC
FAC
FArI I
152 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6.4
­4n v PAr.11
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
30 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: 6
- Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
10 Y FACU (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
�n V PAf`II
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Dji
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 SiL
4-16 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 5/8 20 SiL Manganese
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
✓❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32F-1
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.113409 Long:-79.700298
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 5
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No
Remarks:
Upland point taken within hillslope near floodplain of perennial feature. This point is also for 32C3-UP.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32F-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Acer rubrum
3. Carya glabra
A Pinus virainiana
5.
6.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
60
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
10
N
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
10 N FACU
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5 N NI
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
8
50% of total cover: 42.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 1
2. Oxydendrum arboreum 1
3. Carya glabra 5
4. Quercus rubra 5
5.
50% of total cover: 17.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 1
2. Fagus grandifolia 5
3. Juniperus virginiana 2
4.
50% of total cover: 8.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5
= Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20% of total cover: 17
OBL species x 1 =
5 Y FAC FACW species x 2 =
0 Y UPL FAC species 95 x 3 = 285
N FACU FACU species 29 x 4 = 116
N FACU UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
Column Totals: 134 (A) 451 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.37
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: 7 ❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 Y FAC El - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Y FACU ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
N FACU data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
r = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3.4
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
7 V CA(-[ I
Z = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 0.4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
r = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3.4
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
7 V CA(-[ I
Z = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 0.4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32Fd
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/3 100 SL
4-16 10YR 5/6 100 L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32FA
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.113749 Long:-79.700568
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 0
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PFO located within floodplain of perennial stream feature.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 6
4
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32F-WEa
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5
2. Carpinus caroliniana
5
N
FAC
Fraxinus enns Ivanica
3. p y
5
N
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8
5.
6.
4
50% of total cover: 20
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Platanus occidentalis 5
2. Carpinus caroliniana 5
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Carpinus caroliniana
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 62.5
0 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20% of total cover: 8
OBL species x 1 =
Y FACW FACW species x 2 =
Y FAC FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
u = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
r, V �Ar
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex stricta 5 Y FACW
2. Allium vineale 2 Y FACU
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover: 1.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 10 Y FACU
Smilax rotundifolia 5 Y FAC
3.
4.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32FIM
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 4/3 100 SiL
6-16 2.5Y 4/2 90 7.5YR 5/8 10 C M SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32J-L
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.114123 Long:-79.699826
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 1
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32J-UP
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
40
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Quercus rubra
30
Y
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Li uidambast aciflua 20 N FAC
r r
3. q y
4. Acer rubrum 15 N FAC
5. Platanus occidentalis
5
N
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species o
44.4 /o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (q/g)
6.
110 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 10 Y FAC
2. Carpinus caroliniana 5 Y FAC
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Carpinus caroliniana 10 Y FAC
2. Fagus grandifolia 2 N FACU
3.
4.
c = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 6 20% of total cover: 2.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Y FACU
2. Allium vineale 2 Y FACU
Z Carex blanda 2 Y FAC
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
9 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4.5 20% of total cover: 1.8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica 5 Y FACU
3.
4.
Z) = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2•5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
FAC species 62 x 3 = 186
FACU species 84 x 4 = 336
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 151 (A) 532 (g)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
Present? Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32J-
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/3 100 SL
4-16 10YR 5/6 100 L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 3/28/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-32J-V
Investigator(s): C. Inscore/ Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.113898 Long:-79.698822
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam. NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 1
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No
Remarks:
Point taken within PFO wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 0
0
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-32J-WEd
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Platanus occidentalis
40
Y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5
2. Acer rubrum
40
Y
FAC
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
N
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7_
5.
6.
9(
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Acer rubrum 50
2.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 25
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum 2
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 5
3. Rubus argutus 5
4.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
Y FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
= Total Cover
0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: 10
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Y FAC
0 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
N FAC
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
N FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
ou = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides 5 Y FACU
2. Carex stricta 5 Y FACW
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
In V CArl I
ou = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: FDS-32J-fi
to the depth needed to
or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 Si
4-16 5Y 4/2 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M SL Manganese masses
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
✓❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 1/15/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33-Ui
Investigator(s): A. Reushe / Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.116504 Long:-79.694895
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: U
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ (If no explain in Remarks.)
_ Slope (%): 2
Datum: WGS84
land
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No=✓ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .= No
Remarks:
Upland data point for PFO wetland 33C.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches):
❑
=
Saturation Present? Yes No = Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33-UP
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera (Tuliptree)
20
YES
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet -gum)
30
YES
FAC
3. Fagus grandifolia (American beech)
15
YES
FACU
5.
6.
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet -gum) 20
2. Liriodendron tulpifera (Tuliptree) 15
3. Acer rubrum (Red maple) 10
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 22.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Ilex opaca (American holly)
2. Fagus grandifolia (American beech)
3.
4.
YES FAC
YES FACU
vFS PA(-.
45 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
61
1.1
1101
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides (Christmas fern) 5
2. Microstegium vimineum (Japanse stilt grass) 2E
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle)
3.
4.
YES FACU
YES FACII
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2
NO FACU
YES FAC
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
1n VFc PAf`II
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1
=
FACW species
x 2
=
FAC species 4
x 3
= 12
FACU species 6
x 4
= 24
UPL species
x 5
=
Column Totals: 10
(A)
36 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
10
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes ❑ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33-Lfi
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5Y 3/3 100 Clay loam
3-16 2.5Y 4/3 100 Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: NCNG McLeansville City/County: Guilford Sampling Date: 1/15/2019
Applicant/Owner: North Carolina National Guard State: NC Sampling Point: FDS-33-W
Investigator(s): A. Reusche / Timmons Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.116369 Long:-79.694699 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnC - Enon fine sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _❑✓ No ❑. (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ Soil = or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No ❑
Are Vegetation❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _❑ No= within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes .❑ No _Q
Remarks:
Wetland data point for PFO-33C. Small PFO wetland adjacent to intermittent stream INT-33B
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—I Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓❑ Saturation (A3)
✓❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes =
No Q Depth (inches): 4
2
EL
Saturation Present? Yes=
No ❑ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: FDS-33WET
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liriodendron tulipifera (Tuliptree)
20
YES FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5
(A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet -gum)
30
YES FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata:
10
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
50
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25
20% of
total cover: 10
Total % Cover of:
10
Multiply by:
10
15
OBL species
x 1
=
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species 0
x 2
= 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua (Sweet -gum)
40
YES FAC
130
390
2. Liriodendron tulpifera (Tuliptree)
25
YES FACU
FAC species
x 3
=
3. Acer rubrum (Red maple)
30
YES FAC
FACU species 80
x 4
= 320
UPL species 0
x 5
= 0
4.
Column Totals: 220
(A)
720
(B)
5.
50% of total cover: 47.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Ligustrum sinense (Chinese privet)
3.
4.
45 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 19
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Polystichum acrostichoides (Christmas fern) 10 YES FACU
2. Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stilt grass 30 YES FAC
3. Carex stricta (Uptight sedge) 10 YES OBL
5.
6.
7.
10.
11.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle) 20 YES FACU
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.27
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
0 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 10
Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes M No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: FDS-33V\fl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5YR 4/3 100 Loam
3-12 10YR 5/2 70 7.5YR 5/8 30 C PL Clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) "Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

EPH-G1- Stream EPH-B
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1/17/2019
ProjeCVSite: NCNG Mcleansville Read
Latitude: 36.11399
Evaluator: C. Inscore/Timmons
County: Guilford
Longitude:-79.698941
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 17.5
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: McLeansville
if � 19 or perennial if 2,30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
F_2__j
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
0
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2j
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
®
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
®
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 3.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
®
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.5 }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
0
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
L 3j
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
L-0-i
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
®
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
=1
1
1.5
25. Algae
®
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

INT-32D - Stream H
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1/17/2019
ProjeCVSite: NCNG Mcleansville Read
Latitude: 36.110679
Evaluator: C. Inscore/Timmons
County: Guilford
Longitude:-79.695789
Total Points:
Stream Determination circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 19.5
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: McLeansville
if �: 19 or perennial if z 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
F-71
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
0
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2j
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
®
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
0
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8 }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
0
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
L 3j
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
L-0-i
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

PER-33A1- Stream D
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 1/17/2019
ProjeCVSite: NCNG McLeansville
Latitude: 36.116696
Evaluator: M. Gilbert/Timmons
County: Guilford
Longitude:-79.695008
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 42.5
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: McLeansville
if �: 19 or perennial if z 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
F_2__j
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
1
2
0
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
0
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
0
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
0
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8 }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
0
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
L 3j
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
L-0-i
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
®
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: