NCC205182_Site Plan or Location Map_20201113

� � ONv7N70n � 3r 3
w
O W
po ax3arax3 � � w
1''bJ !lY03] u
V
M
xoo EGA�YOR M � Ic Y �
a5o 1
v c 15 N05NNOf � �
W Fof�k Beep K,Iver
1S 907]N34SV9
J
a --
_ 86SN1'03A733 v
NQ
s
rr _wti
z o9v3e� _ 'i GLf8R00x RD
CD jj U r7�Fi�:1LSH©dam T —
W —j I 0
Y LI--I Y Rp Nfl�53Nfd N1ML `}
cr- 0 -
N U _
z 0 f/' �I �bN3��H3Mo as -
Z It
G�
LU
S �P PP�� 00AP�lJFF RO

8
M „SS ,O .08
006666E
z
v
�o
OOL666E 009666E 00E666E 006666E 0060E6E
00L666E 009666E 00E666E 006666E 006066E
Z
v
�o
O (h
N w
M „T4,6S o61
O O
LO N
N O)
(6
d
T
N
8
i)
� U
= m
'o �
() Q
o
Lf)
N
U
>
�
n
C
O
y,�
16
Z
W
A
j�f
In
W
L>)
>
X
Q
O
O
�
V
co
g
� o
L fn
Lf)
O.
C
N •0
2
N +�
>
p
p
L
L
7 N
zQ
C
ZU
8
M „SS,O.08
Q�I
OOL066E
z
N
�o

0
Z
/W
V
W
J
a
O O
U)
O
m
U
N
0)
Uy y
0) m N
N
(n
0)
N O
C
Q
U
o U O
y�
(U
LO
O
0 C
m
E
U)
E
'O U) - -p
"'
U)
C O E
-
- N
Y
.y E
O
O N
0) `) N a
0) O
c
O
E
N
m
m
0)
O
N
0) CJ
O U Q N
Z
V O
UU))
LI E U) -6
m
d
0) (au)
Q
N
O
N
� O2 `) 0)
CO W
au))
m (U O
U)
U
O
Z
N
�
N O O
U
� Qs
N
CL
0)
Q
m
y
p w Q
N
O
i U
N O (6 O
m U o
0)
T N
O
Q
O
O
N
(U -0 E
C
U 0)
0)
N C U U
O
7
O�
U
Q
E �' m(n
NU)
'0 0) m
7 u) U O U)
O
w '6
U
O
Q
a) m E 0)
m m
U
N 0)O
Q
'6 O
O�
0)
N
N
m 0
O O C
y
.�-i
m�
oa)Q.E0
(n U)
Q C
�:N
Utl)
'3�
>
Q
U)
t C O
N
a)
Z E
Q 2 U
a) Q O
0)
aaci a)
m
a)
0)
rn
0 p�
� -0 --
E
� L N O) (U
O) M
-O
N 0
m�
E
O _O (D 7
C y
Q 0) U)
0) (6 (6 7
,U)
C
N Q
U) (60
.2-0 m Q
-0O
m
>'
g� U
:5 3� m�
U .o
Q
0
s C� E
E
cn -
O
E m 3 U
0 o 0) 0) O
7 to
_0
O O
a)
Ncr
Q
7
O_ O
N
m 00
0 O
o '6 O
fOA N
p C
U (n -6
(n U C
>
O- 0)
(n N
(U O
E O
y 0
N
N
0 -TEL 0) C
m m
0) 0)
j O
p 0) p
Q .� 0) U
m O n �_
y
L
-
O 7
- O
O N
m
0) E m55
FL E
U U
p
2 Q=o Q m
H o
U U
U—
H U .- w
y
�
y
Q
4
(i
O
U
R
L
L
O_
Q
>.
O
a)
R
2
y
O
a
-yo
O
L
d
Q
°
Z U)
°
J
m
E
N
m
y
o
O
M
°
O
m
R
a
m
o O
U) (n
N
>
L_
O
U)
aR
y
(n
�
O
N
U
S
a Q
*
R
N
R
�
C
�
R 4
R5
F
R
m
y
C
O
y
o
.�
O
Q
U)
a°
a°
N
cL
N
Q
a
U
0
a
C C
> >
_
C
>
G)
y
C)
Q
3
Q
o
a
w
Q
U)
3 y
`
O O
FL
R
O
o
>
>
O`
w
O
o
�
o
�
°
LU
o
Q
_ 0
O-
co
—oo
3
O
w>>
aRaoc
oo
YN_
o ao
y
Q
0
n n
0
n
o
m
O
'
N
a
O
m
m
U)
R
U)
o
U)
in U) U)
w
a
R
yp�pyp��
`¢
`
11F
U)
Q
y
m
Z

Soil Map -Guilford County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaC
Casville sandy loam, 6 to 10
5.4
1.7%
percent slopes
CaD
Casville sandy loam, 10 to 15
3.5
1.1 %
percent slopes
ChA
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
10.6
3.3%
slopes, frequently flooded
CkB
Clifford sandy loam, 2 to 6
132.6
41.4%
percent slopes
CkC
Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10
26.0
8.1 %
percent slopes
CkD
Clifford sandy loam, 10 to 15
48.8
15.2%
percent slopes
CI132
Clifford sandy clay loam, 2 to 6
27.1
8.4%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CIC2
Clifford sandy clay loam, 6 to
12.7
4.0%
10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CnA
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent
1.2
0.4%
slopes, frequently flooded
EnB
Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6
1.8
0.6%
percent slopes
EnD
Enon fine sandy loam, 10 to 15
2.8
0.9%
percent slopes
NaB
Nathalie sandy loam, 2 to 6
37.2
11.6%
percent slopes
NaC
Nathalie sandy loam, 6 to 10
0.3
0.1 %
percent slopes
PoD
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10
7.7
2.4%
to 15 percent slopes
PoE
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 15
0.8
0.3%
to 35 percent slopes
W
Water
1.3
0.4%
WwC
Wynott-Wilkes-Poindexter
0.6
0.2%
complex, 2 to 10 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
320.6
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/6/2020
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Z
v
�o
006666E
M „T4,6S o6L 1
4
g
8
M „SS ,O o08
006666E
z
v
�o
00L666E 009666E
00E666E 006666E 0060E6E
00L666E 009666E 00E666E 006666E 006066E
Z
v
�o
O LO
N w
M„14,6S o61
O O
LO N
N O)
(6
d
T
g
U)
.o
-�
U)Q
0 �
Lf)
N
U
>
�
n
C
O
Z
A
j�f
In
W
L>)
>
X
Q
O
O
�
V
co
g
N >
L y
a
{off
dS
Lf)
lo
O.
C
N •0
N +�
>
No 2
L
L
7 N
zQ
C
Z 0
8
OOL066E
z
N
�o

N � N
m
y
m
_
U
U
N
y '
m p
m
C V O
O
N U O
N
U
O
a) O ,C
m 2 m 0
E
N
U) E
.�
U)a)N
E
O-
U 7 E
m
O
U
C
CLCL
I�
N
— U N
Z
E
O
CL
O N
O N a
N O
(n
O
E
m
N-0 O
tl)
a)Fu
U
CL m
m C E
O N N
m
+E" N
N
y
m
m 0
a)
y
N CJ
N
O U)
Z
U O
tl)
�
U E y -6
Q
y
w
O O O
O_
y U
Nc U) m
L N
2i
'6
p N>
U)
E
U L1J
N O O N
Q-C
(n
O
Z
N
Q
y m N
c
O
U m CL C
L
U)
C U) m
CL
N
m
y
p Q
LL
O
O
m
y E tll
(6
O
U (p
m 'O C O
N
O
(n
(6
C
O
(u tlj O
LL
>
a)O
>
p O N
U
> C U
30
0
E> N N
Z
N
�
O L
N
O
N
N
'� N m
7 u) U O jn
O-
w '6
U O
O_
N m E N
O m
_
O
N
m
CL
0
m
O
Q
U
U
Q
3 J>
N O_'E O
N—
a�
3 i
m
E
o m
m�
Q 0
n
m
a�
O N p
tl)
O
E
0) N
>'
p 'O
C tl)
O_ N >+
N U (6 (6 7
,tl) -O
N Q
y
._
T
O '6 (0 0_
O
C m E o
a) N E rn
0 0
) (n
U °?
"" 2� C m (6
7
U .O
Q m
'C
o
N
L O N E
Q m
(n
O
C
E N .�
N '6 y
N E
0— m
O C
E m p
O a
O p U p ""
'6
O>
CL 0
O O
a�
(6
O 'O
O O
y
E
m
2) C (6
Q
N 7
U) (n
O
2 U 'O
y U C
u) a)
3 >,
a�
E O
O
O)
o 'Q N C
L ON.
F
C 'N C O U
N a)
p N p
m O (n �_ U
-0
L
0 7
O N
m O
t p m
H �
S
W E— U y
a E
u)
2 CL Q m
H o
U) U)
U)
U. U)
y
N
L
T
L
CL
�
°'
y y
y 0 R
o
r
o
m
o
o � �
a
C R
O
R
N
U R J
0
Q
0
0
C
7
W
R
R
O
F
m
W
CL
R
R
R
0) (n
o
0) In o
0)
In o
R
N
.-. d) (O
o O O
y O
N o
Cl) 0
O -,
O .-.
o
`0 O
0) (0 N
O O M
O
o O
0
`p
.-.
o
O
m
O
(0 N
O M
O
o O
0
`p
U
a
C
.-.
O
O O M
rn
a
a O
o y
(0 M
.0 a
a o
O
y
(0
ro
(M
a o
y
Q
0 .�
a a a
=
a
m w .�
c
a
a a a
= m
0 a
a
a a
H
a > > >
> o
o >
> > >
o o
a >
>
> >
o o y
Q
y
p) 2 2 2
c
2 Z
Z p) 2
c
2 2 2
Z Z
p) 2
c
2
2 2
Z Z
(n
C
R 1
y
O ❑ ❑ ❑
❑
❑ O
i i
i
=
0 0
R
0 G/
Q
y
m
Z

Hydric Rating by Map Unit -Guilford County, North Carolina
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaC
Casville sandy loam, 6
0
5.4
1.7%
to 10 percent slopes
CaD
Casville sandy loam, 10
0
3.5
1.1 %
to 15 percent slopes
ChA
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2
5
10.6
3.3%
percent slopes,
frequently flooded
CkB
Clifford sandy loam, 2 to
0
132.6
41.4%
6 percent slopes
CkC
Clifford sandy loam, 6 to
0
26.0
8.1 %
10 percent slopes
CkD
Clifford sandy loam, 10
0
48.8
15.2%
to 15 percent slopes
CI132
Clifford sandy clay loam,
0
27.1
8.4%
2 to 6 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
CIC2
Clifford sandy clay loam,
0
12.7
4.0%
6 to 10 percent
slopes, moderately
eroded
CnA
Codorus loam, 0 to 2
5
1.2
0.4%
percent slopes,
frequently flooded
EnB
Enon fine sandy loam, 2
1
1.8
0.6%
to 6 percent slopes
EnD
Enon fine sandy loam,
0
2.8
0.9%
10 to 15 percent
slopes
NaB
Nathalie sandy loam, 2
0
37.2
11.6%
to 6 percent slopes
NaC
Nathalie sandy loam, 6
0
0.3
0.1 %
to 10 percent slopes
PoD
Poplar Forest sandy
0
7.7
2.4%
loam, 10 to 15 percent
slopes
PoE
Poplar Forest sandy
0
0.8
0.3%
loam, 15 to 35 percent
slopes
W
Water
0
1.3
0.4%
WwC
Wynott-Wilkes-
0
0.6
0.2%
Poindexter complex, 2
to 10 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
320.6
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/6/2020
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Guilford County, North Carolina
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/6/2020
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Guilford County, North Carolina
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/6/2020
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

C/)
0
C:
co
(D
i
►
�
W
i�:
�
�
0
�
z
`
m$
}\E
\\
)/
\\\G
SO
<
-
e
]®Co
_]!2a
CL \2
)/0 CL
�\
E au)
«e®;=
co
rA2/
0 F—I El
7
g
2 \
g =
\ �
9
\ k
/ \ \
L E 0-
co \ \
/ / /
E E E
1:1 7 7

❑
Q
Q (iN = N
O 1
N
C
O
m S
6
(i
N
>
_
N
C
N
N
L
U
z
Q
O
Q
Q
(o =
E
(6
E a�
tl
J
r�i i L
(6
O
CL =
OiO
iU=
=
oLL
mC
°
3
m
CL
E~a�'
o
o
NE
-cc
°
_=
E
EO
-0o
w0¢
w�o—(6
O O
'6
'6n
N
-
'O
C=(6o
O.i
❑Zua❑
'O
N N
U=O =
eW
(
N
O
0 CLL0
O (_o
(0
3
N
(w6
E
wO
TW OU
LL
(dT6
yN
o
0
((O=
=
_w dU
LL
E
o
>
i
>
d
d=E
=E
oNO
aE
Eo=a
m¢>i
Ui
a0
C N Z
°
w3j>
a
w'
o
6 O
Oy
W
(0 >N
U
EC
m(oo
T
LL,
N❑
O x N
LL
C
C.)
N ON
C�
CL
_
LLo
>N d
aE
N_3
LLm¢wdOC
N
¢�
U .
d
N
0
o
c
m (0
d nn
m
N.0
6
N
oc
wtlNll
Q(o=
(0
�a
�
(a
=
w °
U
¢>w
c
Eo
O �c
COC (o
LL U
d
¢ W
d
¢
>
o
_(o
Z
J
._
O
W Q�N(0
d
o
oll
N(N3o
y
w
II
®
°
C
=O
O
U
w
'f
O\E
m
UE
O
OO
O QEE;�
EO6=C`o
v�0❑�ni
I^fff
N C O
_
=QoA
•O
ZO-
O
E'Q
..��W��..1��
ONw❑oFa
O
W
W W
LLI
EQ=
U'p 6
Z
N=
QO
'O (o
W
Z
ELfM
Q O N
mo
'oyOL0
Q N
yiW
Q NO
(o Cw
LL
W¢
Z
��
¢
w
LL
(0 w E
nQ
E—i
nan
=
N
W Q
H
(oW
F N li 3
J
N
O
vai=
�LL
79°59'58.96"W
CD
CD
�CD
N
0
0
0
O
Lo
N