780096_Inspection_20200903

1 S (-1 5 E t' I 4-0 '-v 15 Li
t Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 7 t: - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: •Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:L c rzi &> Arrival Time:1 /i Q[;j .f Departure Time:PIRA' County:RptcS(-1\ Region: F4 y
Farm Name: IZ 03 -e✓ r`' �%�C .fil n� Owner Email:
Owner Name: pq t"✓t )3, O 'tot Phone:
Mailing Address: J
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: F1 G UGC ktar5 Title: Phone:
QQ
Onsite Representative: Integrator: YY\ U " lit�ii•h '
Certified Operator: - 11 Certification Number: l e27 q
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 7/2.0 7 017-0 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca I aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish • I. -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ['()Its- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ®-1(rA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No <A. ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ N [�NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? El
❑ NA El NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes L._J '�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 7 7b 'Date of Inspection: 3 54-2020
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No RNA—
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ['1' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes El ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): l- f SUo gity G�
13. Soil Type(s): F (I)L i '`L1.1 L y y1GI N0
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes airNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [JV1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes EaAte ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes 04.0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes (2'l�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Ito ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Elio ❑ NA El NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 7 - IDate of Inspection:3Ji - 2072 /
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El Yes El<oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes Et'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes L1"'( ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [J-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1=1 N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 13 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cat -itivt, 101 tfr cc- gc(,4t C-1 — q•
f �
cietekce, toG, 61--) edi vi .egfyi
_r►�11i-°st--e-cA<<�P
C�t� c b5.1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � . (M,j PhoneF CI 31, 33y
ifoReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date`(1\DO-2-02 10
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015