780095_Inspection_20200625

Division of Water Resources MIAs i j
Facility Number 7 e - 7 s 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: aC`om ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:J SS,.�V • Arrival Time:I /A L 36 Departure Time: MEM County: tb 7' Region: F'/
Farm Name: � « y� 4. (� AL))0t)(t caner Email: scc �-e
DIVA . a
Owner Name: 5 kb-Pt, L fit ,e.1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4,1 U,,,,t be (£t, l Fitle: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 ( Integrator: Uft3 5 v6'.444-0er-r( 2
Certified Operator: t( Certification Number: ..(-(/3 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder S S 5 2 TOO Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca I ad Po.. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MinIMMI-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow ,
MIEMIZII
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [_Ate❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1Z1A D NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E i A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ IA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 8 - cis Date of Inspection: ?S 3 "c 2sZ
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? 0 Yes ❑ No [-IAA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 33
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 11Pcio' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L.G 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C t etl SG
13. Soil Type(s): L11 ,' N G(
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E' To ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E(slo 0 NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑'moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists 0 Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 0 Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 16 - '75 'Date of Inspection: 0�-$'7. A.c.Zd7
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes I 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Erco ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ti No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes n<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Eio ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IEKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes EVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Celt 1),/.04 20 (y.
5((ay sum - 3.7_ 0_ 7. 7 6 -f--3, 7�
C, 90- 30 - 6 s (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: i3 1 k1, V Phone:�,t 0`�3 -3 3 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l,� Date: tS�UN0'10
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015