780094_Inspection_20200625

ivision of Water Resources Qj f U Y 20210
Facility Number 7 g - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: GrCom ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �LLK� Arrival Time:M i) 4— Departure Time:I /tI1 DP I County: f-"i rsv1 Region:r
Farm Name: / ) N.
l�'C�-y.L � h�a� (/1(� N lc� �`�O//
Ct) Owner Email:
Owner Name: S II Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: L�
Facility Contact: �'46.7 / ea-'l /W`L "hT?tle: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I( Integrator: kg 't & tz
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 2q(.7 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 35 S Z —{?-- Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca'aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish -- Beef Stocker
Gilts MI Non-La ers _— Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MECE3=1111
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other --
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 144o D NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No —A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [6NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes []'iCTO—❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7r- - qL( 'Date of Inspection: . $fu 2Jo 34
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ID NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes ElNo la NA.— ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): I 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes l}-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ID.Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ElAcii ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 10 D NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
(/ U 12.Crop Type(s): — 44 S(90
13. Soil Type(s): L, y W o�
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes alCro ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 12-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑J o ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes JA o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 g - Date of Inspection:.24.y71"'e._ 7-07041
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes " o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [IKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes I/Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes :Pro ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 610 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'io ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [[].Iio ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes n-IQo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'co ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
aa-(1 :"I'�l o Fc q -2(tu3
56-te7{s.tuivei 37 - 0 C2-- 27b ( - 3 , & 3
exAt at°AJ3oF-- 6gsf
Reviewer/Inspector Name: N j,q u Phone: 1(J C(13`33 3
,c- c �/1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j 2.40
Date: � J'E "� U�/
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015