780089_Inspection_20200618

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 7 - g Cj 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Com lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: f g'T„ ,lC Arrival Time: ! O& I Departure Time:VD;be) County: go be fob Region:
Farm Name: f i t 1 /y G Y c'.-1, 0"``7e FacvtA Owner Email:
0 ,
Owner Name: st(Ay /z, 0)ee'.C4 it'd Phone:
Mailing Address: 1 ` li'cl 'Pn C L 1--240
Physical Address: f e-wv J`t` %a iv__ '? 2i
Facility Contact: (ar r�J 0 k e t CeiklAC Title: Phone:
l
Onsite Representative: 1/ Integrator: !y 4
Certified Operator: '( Certification Number: /V 4'
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Yoe at - Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean _ Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder /5,0 30 Dr Poult Ca'aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish IIIIMIII=-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars II Pullets Beef Brood Cow
MIEMEI
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other _-
Dischar¢es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes DI-1Qo 1111A
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No [ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No LJ li •t' ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No El/NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

!Facility Number: g - 8 C/ Date of Inspection: /D j.ter2,0
Waste Collection&Treatment l
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11119-A ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ -N ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No U 'IA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0:11qA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No E NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No l4lA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I -1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Approved Area
qq
12.Crop Type(s): nt 16(eft £2
13. Soil Type(s): L 01
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes I NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ErrA Ei NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No aIQA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 1:FIC ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No EKA.
❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Check'ists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below Q'1es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
R infall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? E Y s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No IA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

!Facility Number: '7 e g l Date of Inspection: ie •3.�r�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑.Pt2V ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No [l N ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No EKA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1:1'1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑.Ivo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 11-1Cric- El NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ivv rl,t4, ke Kce rw �.� ( od9S
y
s G.ct Sys (14 St I J�Q-��( Air S
Flo
Reviewer/Inspector Name: SL, I i) U�t� Phone:�(�-4 3 -33 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: S3) 13 & Date: I V Tl/t e. fkU
rko
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015