780084_Inspection_20200625

Gdff<-
'vision of Water Resources ill ►k S S(.:IN
Facility Number 7 8 - e4-1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency `h.C)
Type of Visit: aksm lance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ig
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:Its rt-cA,I'
7i Arrival Time:I 336 P Departure Time:I V�,I Dtj County: ..0irSo4 Region:ply
Farm Name: 6 4_U j0) 14tCLe M Fcci--1/\.. Owner Email:
Owner Name: /0 ttL'f yvt Gfect,, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: n of et ,t'L4t'1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I( Integrator: 143 ' 5114(TI'e `'x
Certified Operator: 1 Certification Number: 1 617 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 3z,0c7 . 'r l'(7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
-
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca i ad Po.. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIZEI -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
•
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MEMEI
Other •Turke Poults —_
Other II Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El Nn ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [-rt- ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 1311A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ 6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes EI-Ntc ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7(g - 8 [Date of Inspection;,` 7-a.1/4. 241)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes airy-❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 0-5
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes It-le--❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [i ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [ .-No-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes laTC2 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3'1Vo El NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CCU f C —Ito( SC, 0
A L
13. Soil Type(s): /t/U O
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? El Yes [E No El NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ['1I ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Er&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes lio ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes J3 No ❑ NA El NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP CI Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [!]No El NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections r ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ o El NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes diNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: {J - y Date of Inspection: Q3t5 ' C QA2a
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EFIcrci ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IE'1V4K ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q.Nr- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1V V ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 111-446-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes TkIcliT ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cot(t ort$ — g
Gt 7 C, Sc.(crArl g'-'2.49 —c°C „ow
"e4, c(o . 3 0 (9& 5 t-f33 333 y
Reviewer/Inspector Name: G t It 0 vA 1.q /n Phone: C/I 0 3138 b
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 (�(�/ -00U Dater�c 2-0(40
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015