780076_Inspection_20200903

1 '•' t/ ti 15U
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number Tf - 7 6 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: •Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
r
Date of Visit: L Arrival Time:I(Of O SIT Departure Time: Et cc) J" I County: Rol7t, c1.4 Region: E/ l
't �L t
Farm Name: 1�t 0 k. C.;44 'tom- j S4 vlut1 e Pc+c.(d/ Owner Email:
Owner Name: R 1 nk 014 s L p Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (Zl L AGc'-d 14&e5 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t Integrator: NI 6 5►'kt
`/ 3gI
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish `7q'u� 7803 Dairy Heifer _
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca'aci Pol. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIEE -- Beef Stocker
Gilts U Non-La ers -_ Beef Feeder
Boars El Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
11110
Other •Turke Poults
Other El Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Et'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No f 1IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No IA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q A ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ''18 - (, Date of Inspectionr3$'id20Zs) I
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): '4, f
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (3 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [moo Ej NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ailo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes io El NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
El PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applicationli Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C S&-o gay
Oybe�til.S L41&rl
13. Soil Type(s): tth,)cv
14.Do the receiving crops differ from thoseTT
designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 111 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑C•Ido ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes EKTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis El Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Iff)o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes DI No ❑ NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 6 - 7 'Date of Inspection: 3 Se rf Z.o14
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑. 1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [15,_Noo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes QAO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes J4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1J,'V ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes `-k ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1:;1/4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ii6. 01N_vo 31(.411 (5,rul , 4 - 3. p_ 3 ,
R L 5 'wetp�-(o� 5.`� `s
12
cam.( foo ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: i l 0 Phone: g`o- l 33"'3;J c(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ( Date: cer— ZO
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015