780052_Inspection_20200625

vision of Water Resources t k S ),( Tat 3-02-0 r
Facility Number 7 S - s z 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: G'Com liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
'^ 9,a�o ,
Date of Visit:Imo( J ,ti.e, Arrival Time:rieinf;i Departure Time:r7l County: r,n LCSO-1 Region: r
Farm Name: "Z.-41k k4 Le-4-Pt FC/K Owner Email:
✓ I^
Owner Name: ,J 0 11 A Ff III
c- !,ea c Phone:
Mailing Address: I 2. ti 0 �'I�' �Ov•1`n� �O'�� 4 ,9, fit Z-& 3`tf
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: J ° I L1-1- Title: Phone:
I
Onsite Representative: ( ( Integrator: ►r I FJ `Svh(Pi-elk j c
Certified Operator: (( Certification Number: I 0 3 1 `f
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 14 Y k a.is 5 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca i aci Po.. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
111811
Other II Turke Poults
Other IN Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E'g-; ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No Eq-NA El NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0-1CiA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DKA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes lallo El NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes U'ISlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: 7 - `-j Z Date of Inspection:Yu>1r, 2-07-0
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes A ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [n NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z I
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes SIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [Rico ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0< ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes I= ' ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 111'15C; ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C- (4 C $ -S 6 0
13. Soil Type(s): Al° ` g-ct
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes dal% ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes <0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 1io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUP El Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: is' - C Z 'Date of Inspection: .2 S .Kr 70 40
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? El Yes EkTO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes jo ❑ NA El NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑i'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes l d ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes lariNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
slE-te Scot y — rntcy r
7-6
-rA cl cO-3o — 6 e s 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ( V.0 it,l¢,m Phone: [(0-"(3 13 3 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: cdp /,VA,/ Date: pas.J0,t.i.e Zn
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015