780036_Inspection_20200702

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - - 3 L 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
/ 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®C'om iance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: PMj C Arrival Time:11<to J Departure Time:l/OJ S i4 County:I`b1-Sovi Region: ry
Farm Name: Sc (IL4,i L-vcit fcce' vtl Owner Email:
Owner Name: 114 v v. L_OCkt et `'.- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: L
Facility Contact: G uL-e�6/b C(€/G4' Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: (( Integrator: 14(S `- ?, 4 L1 c W
Certified Operator: `( Certification Number: le-3I ✓�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish ,1.S ZO 20 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current .Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca tad Po i. Non-Dairy
•
Farrow to Finish MIMI=-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -_ Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MIECIE
Other •Turke Poults
Other I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NIA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No I21 A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No �lA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 1;1fiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: T V - 3h 'Date of Inspection: Z,: te4 ;ZOz:2i
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes I-14o-0 NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 111-11-
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes a..Ner El NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes I —No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑'No 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [—No ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes ®1 ❑ NA 0 NE
El Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop [Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C 3 M P SG-19
13. Soil Type(s): G 0 1144, 46G,(9 PoesJI[.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes -N'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes la1vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ©No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [alt.lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check El Yes EI-NVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
El WUP ❑Checklists El Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 171<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 78 3 (0 Date of Inspection: z.ale4 Zj
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 13—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ['o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lalCio ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [f'�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C vt2t1 ° sLru,k clart Sttstvei )-7 -2,-0 - r 0
elosoc,, , sit/di 4-0 ket-r10-eic,
C,.?At a to- 0 e v�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: b L (Wv`G p Phone l/O" f3 3`O 3 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: zr . -v zv
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015