780022_Inspection_20200625

Division of Water Resources ( , s 1-`Te,2 zO
Facility Number 1 77 - ak 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency 50
Type of Visit: O Cli liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: U Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
gor'Date of Visit: aS &-t Arrival Time:] ..` Departure3` ° PCounty: rokrdelRegion: J`'
� Time: �/
Farm Name: inot-.-1 Fet,•t vki Owner Email:
Owner Name: FC..10q14
T U yl rp 0 4 .-\ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: f` 11.,D%At �'0'1 Title: Phone:
1
Onsite Representative: I( Integrator: 5-14.,t(64--e. -109
Certified Operator: t( Certification Number: 17( S 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 70'0 S 0..c_ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca 1 aci Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish IIIIMM=-- Beef Stocker
Gilts I Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars El Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MINCEEME
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J3-Ne—El NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ -NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ['tA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No I NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes p-1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes__QIlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 6_ ZZ Date of Inspection: t, a0
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes alYp_E1 NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No U 1`^ In NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): a G
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �]�N ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 3_oi❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes laNe ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C(A) — S 6'0
13. Soil Type(s): 600E
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ELM ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [c]1do ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes M-Ns ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes Q.DIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [ -tir6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes l?rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Ig - Z7Z/ (Date of Inspection: As 5,-4--14a_X.q2'0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes fl-N S ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes '6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes j1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ 1--1bFC ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 111_Nt< ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes a Np- ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C ( l19l 4 � C21/1/7— — i�
5(bartCc&r(9-°-(-1 avx,c1-4-.9-0c - eft /
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 'Ibb 1 I I �V H Phone:'T� `t 3 33� r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: MA A cljAnDate: g.SJtcnP Rao
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015