780020_Inspection_20200625

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 7 8' - U 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservationtok S X6 tea,aa°
0 Other AgencyCZ
Type of Visit: Co liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: o�s�„,.,te�A rival Time: f 61,0/ Departure Time:I f!3c?4- County: 1�// rrC y
l`b t�SD�9. Regio�,�-/
Farm Name: r-o dt c,� ill '{� ref "Vii Owner Email:
Owner Name: g h 7 4 j. U-- Kt et Z.�c4 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4-►t �y De v/�(jp Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I ( Integrator: 14 9 s /145-`116`e_(iti
Certified Operator: q Certification Number: U'l I ¶7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 7/01-f (Sif ct Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca I aci Po i. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
I.
Other II Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E i ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No EWA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No QUA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: r) g - Date of Inspection:AS SAC nY Ze ZO'
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1:1.Pd ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes laNe— ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 Yes © 0 NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 3 Ni ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeses ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes if o 0 NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U 1 o 0 NA 0 NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C Q fly S
/J( G'6
13. Soil Type(s): p (A)Ol,
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes EKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 12 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes !AK ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes l .4 o ❑ NA El NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes allo El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -ic o ❑ NA 0 NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 1: 0 0 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: '7 - 2-0 Date of Inspection: Z.5 1.4"ty, 20 /0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 13210 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes L!K° ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA D NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes IA 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. D Yes 13o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [v]rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 1:3<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C dzt-kio( . Fn I(
sc.( ey _1/41 -2.0 _ , 3 (Fs' p— 6?
ettt cuo -3 0 se- &B 5
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a U vt{6 f Phone:910` 3 3,33 3 if
oy
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 3-iih Q Z UZp
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015