780019_Inspection_20200903

-514Akt •Eli 2-4) w
•Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ' - f cl 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: •Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: •Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergencyge 0 Other� 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:L3 6,4-3' Arrival Time:(R 1 I-C 4 Departure Time:I /O'-u SfT. County: 1\0 C'4 Region: FaY
"",� ei�//
Farm Name: ,�p k,� c 4t11l t_ = 3_ tie+Ce 3("3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: .JGd rc& r CW-4 % Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ( tic '�1 € 4 I-t&re S Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t ! Integrator: wig s1 .4'l` i.e(c/
Certified Operator: C Certification Number: 2,n 3 61
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 70, 89 OD Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca•aci Po•. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish �[ �--- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MEIME
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1E14 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® f(A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No pl< D NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No IA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [K ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Noo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: (R- /aj (Date of Inspection$ 5 ( )ze
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ErNA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z6)
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 11PPdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E ikil ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I4(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I J ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ‹: ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C s C-G llel
13. Soil Type(s): At 4A(600q)
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [C O ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes i N ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ID Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 21<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ID Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7 5 - [ '1 Date of Inspection: 3 $ 7.
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes f J.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 21' Il-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [_le. ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1111N6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ca k 4-1 5/cd y- Vts 6-- I LI R G -- 13- 3, 6
tsvtity, pvt evt fp -9'if i t s i-t,
c.e4 qio. rog4gst
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � (, l6 D u a I a l3 Phone: "1 ` 3 3-33 J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: t`� z Date: t 0 SC vv Zc2
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015