780018_Inspection_20200903

l dv > S
ID-Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 7 - le 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: •Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:bSi:p a I Arrival Time:min Departure Time: IPWA County: ROtir cove Region: Y
Farm Name: Fer...'M +Z 1 u t6 SL k.lL J7 Owner Email:
Owner Name: g uekk .Si'kt`it rYw4- L P Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:Facility Contact: iz,t(c(ncwJ /-47<-.5 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: tom` Integrator: ut a- S (1T�`'�
"Z0 3g1
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 712.0 'i&.3 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poultr Ca i aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish INEE -- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
MIEMZEMIll
Other •Turke Poults
Other I.Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes o— ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No f❑...NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E 1Vt' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes S-N El NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: 7 6- 1 if' _1 'Date of Inspection: 3ceP( '
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Dick.-c—❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes El No [t -N T[J NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z-1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yesal‘ ❑ NA El NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ No El NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EC4 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 111<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need El Yes T.)Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window l El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C 13 S(-0 t•i�l/
13. Soil Type(s): L)of ill n rl 1 ('j- j
14.Do the receiving crops differ from thole designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ io ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1214 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 114 ❑ NA El NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes al Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes LJ To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes El<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes El El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes go
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: 7 f - F (Date of Inspection: 31 W j 44
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑air ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E 1IIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1/1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [pit ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [j.N ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ear ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes f 4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes I J, '( ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C4,JJb nift tel- ‘v SC e, bu y 8 - iLk1 - 0-- r 1, 2
77a
• r'`�� 1. 5,4t ULSc
a,�,t,(, 8-- 6 5
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 1<2`( 04 D 4_, Phone:9k L 3 3"�7 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:.3nt-
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015