780017_Inspection_20200903

1 V L1 ) Et; r 7c -)-'c:
490 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number I - 7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: •Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0Rooutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access [I
Date of Visit:2 /i'TL)` Arrival Time: p'1 l0 f' Departure Time: /a 10$r County: �tacuj Region: F4
Farm Name: fH 0/ r-tell 4 i suyia,'` /li t 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: g 1 'o kt .1M,1'k a4"Viet f I",to Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: (�
Facility Contact: l\l(�1 u` `«Y -eS Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: l Integrator: Y`� 5` -``e 1i�
Certified Operator: t I Certification Number: Z. 0 3 I
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish -p2° bs E Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dr Poult Ca 1 ad Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish MIEZZMIll-- Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IIIBEE
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 13,1<—❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ 'NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 13" --NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 1:12/1GA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: ) Q - 17 ' 'Date of Inspection:3 S / 24
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No IteCIA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I} 1Co ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes alit— ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable Crop Window^ El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
b 12.Crop Type(s): C [ (7 o /lay
13. Soil Type(s): Al Q /¢ kce,' ��/ tbk,i44.4.4,)
14. Do the receiving crops differ fro rh those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [.-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes la o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes U N7o 0 NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
DWUP ❑Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

!Facility Number: -g - ,? 'Date of Inspection: 3 5 '% '6J 1_O
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [J.Pdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 111.-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
0 Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes F 1V O ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 122-1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lalcrcr❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Elfic ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ YesEr5: ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes LJ o ❑ NA El NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El Yes [7'NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cct.ltbeetf lull '5�Iti cum, -/� I 6 - S 1 u,5
l `
0:54 e \\V G INC
,ti q(0--30 - 6 5
Reviewer/Inspector Name: i 6 E) 0 4 6p Phone:Va tt3 3 '
761
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: S ( Z.Z C
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015