NCG030711_TA Inspection_20201007

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG030711 Effective: 02/11/20 Expiration: 05/31/21 Owner : Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation - Lincolnton Div
County: Lincoln 1980 Indian Creek Rd
Region: Mooresville
Lincolnton NC 28092
Contact Person: Nicole McQueen Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 10/07/2020 Entry Time 01:OOPM
Primary Inspector: James D Moore
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 02:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Technical Assistance
Permit Inspection Type: Metal Fabrication Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG030711 Owner - Facility: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Inspection Date: 10/07/2020 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Based on the inspection the site would be a candidate for representative outfall status. Also, before monitoring relief can be
granted additional monitoring is required. During the next rain event please sample outfalls 2, 2A (new location) and 3. Email
the results to [e-mail] when received. Monitoring at outfalls 1 and 4 is not required during this
investigation period.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG030711 Owner - Facility: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
Inspection Date: 10/07/2020 Inspection Type : Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The plan was updated March 2020
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Benchmarks have been exceeded, and on September 22, 2020 the MRO received a request for
monitoring relief.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Based on the inspection the site would be a candidate for representative outfall status. Outfalls 2
and 3 would be representative of the site's industrial activity.
Page 3 of 3