Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0004308_SOC Application Add Info_20200818Badin Business Park Outfall 005 Compliance Management Plan Update August 18, 2020 Meeting Overview 2 Introductions Objectives: Apprise NCDEQ of BBP’s progress towards Outfall 005 compliance Present proposed remedy & review path forward Agenda: Conceptual model for Outfall 005 drainage basin Overview of collected field data Pumping scenario analysis Proposed solution Path forward General Site Layout 3 Conceptual Site Model –005 Basin 4 General: −Drains approximately 46 acres (Shown in White) −Consists of stormwater runoff and infiltrated groundwater −Discharge of process water & ancillary wastewaters discontinued with Smelter closure in 2010 Structure: −Comprised of 3 main sewer branches −Combined discharge flows to Little Mountain Creek via a roadside ditch adjacent to Highway 740 Water Quality: −Surface runoff has limited fluoride concentrations −Bulk of fluoride mass entering as infiltrating shallow groundwater along the eastern branch −Infiltrating groundwater maintains a baseflow component which is diluted by storm flows. Outfall 005 Roadside Ditch Little Mountain Creek •West (red)•East (orange)•Central (yellow) Overview of 2019-2020 Field Data Collection 5 Objectives −Characterize water quality and flow from each area contributing to Outfall 005 −Evaluate variability of effluent concentrations under different hydrologic conditions −Quantify magnitudes and temporal variability of flows for Outfall 005 and Little Mountain Creek Locations and types of data collected −Continuous flow data in LMC at Hwy 740, Outfall 005, and each of the 3 major branches of the Outfall 005 sewer −Samples collected at each flow monitoring location for several storms and analyzed for fluoride and cyanide Findings from Field Data Collection –Outfall 005 Flow 6 Flows during December through May averaged 170 gpm with a median flow of 77 gpm Peak flows during intense storms exceeded 3,000 gpm several times (max = 6,400) Dry weather flows during summer are <10 gpm -Monitoring offline due to equipment failure -System modified to monitor higher flowrates Findings from Field Data Collection –Little Mountain Creek 7 Flows during December through May averaged 7,400 gpm with a median flow of 1,961 gpm Peak flows from intense storms exceeded 300K gpm several times (max = 325K) Dry weather flows during summer have stayed above 100 gpm -Monitoring offline due to equipment failure -Monitoring location modified Outfall 005 Fluoride & Cyanide Concentration 8 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Cyanide (mg/l)Fluoride (mg/l)Fluoride CN - EPA 335.4" CN - ASTM 7511 Initial Dilution Potential Flushing Small Storm Event (<0.5 in)Larger Storm Event (1.75 in) Findings from Field Data Collection –Fluoride 9 Range of fluoride values at Outfall 005 from storm sampling: 0.47 –2.5 Range of fluoride values at Outfall 005 from most recent two years of DMRs: 0.92 –3.3 Range of fluoride values in Little Mtn. Creek: 0.047 to 0.15 Within the 1st hour of event Findings from Field Data Collection –Cyanide 10 Samples were analyzed with EPA 335.4 method and ASTM D7511 method Results from ASTM method at Outfall 005 were all below chronic criterion Laboratory NC certification for ASTM method is complete −Utilized for DMR reporting beginning in July Outfall 005 Cyanide from ASTM Method Outfall 005 Cyanide from EPA Method # of samples 56 57 Minimum < 2 µg/L < 2.5 µg/L Median < 2 µg/L 5.2 µg/L Maximum 2.7 µg/L 26.0 µg/L Outfall 005 Cyanide from ASTM Method Outfall 005 Cyanide from EPA Method # of samples 6 14 Minimum < 6 µg/L < 5 µg/L Median 3.3 µg/L < 10 µg/L Maximum 14 µg/L 32.0 µg/L DMR Data (since beginning of 2020) Study Results Factors Leading to Evaluating Pumping Scenarios Outfall 005 Compliance Approach 11 The work to date has yielded improvements, but effluent concentrations exceed current permit limits at times. How can the 005 discharge be managed (i.e., when and where) to meet water quality standards in the receiving waters? Little Mountain Creek has considerable assimilative capacity during wet weather (LMC drainage area is approx. 78 times as large as 005 drainage area) Outfall 012 (Badin Lake) has unused assimilative capacity during dry weather (currently discharges only in response to storms) Three pumping scenarios were identified and evaluated; these scenarios consist of pumping different amounts of water from the Outfall 005 drainage area to Badin Lake. Review -Pumping Scenarios Presented in Nov. 2019 Meeting 12 Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Description Isolate water with elevated conc’s (must be less than 40 gpm) and pump to Badin Lake Pump up to 40 gpm to Badin Lake; modify 005 limits based on dilution in LMC Pump up to 180 gpm to new, larger diffuser in Badin Lake; modify 005 limits based on dilution in LMC Pumping rate Up to 40 gpm Up to 40 gpm Up to 180 gpm (approx.) Modify limits at 005 No Yes Yes New diffuser in Badin L.No No Yes Revise mixing zone and modify limits at 012 No No Yes The collected field data was utilized to evaluate each of these scenarios Technical Challenges for Pumping Scenarios 13 Flow rates of water with elevated fluoride concentrations (primarily the subsurface drain along the east side of the Outfall 005 drainage area) often exceeds 40 gpm Scenario A is eliminated Outfall 005 discharges do not meet the current permit limit for fluoride (1.8 mg/L) at low to moderate flow rates; however, observed concentrations in LMC have met chronic water quality criteria Scenario B & C are valid options Pumping more than 40 gpm to Badin Lake would require installing a larger pipe and diffuser, as well as a revised mixing zone analysis Uncertainty of jurisdictional status of the roadside ditch that conveys discharges from Outfall 005 to Little Mountain Creek. Preliminary assessment is the ditch would be an exempt feature Proposed Solution 14 The proposed solution is: Pump up to 40 gpm from Outfall 005 to Outfall 012 during dry periods (Typically June –October) Flow in excess of 40 gpm will continue to discharge through Outfall 005 Establish fluoride chronic limit at Outfall 005 to 3.0 mg/L −Based on critical dilution of 0.7 to 1 in LMC (achieved 99.86% of the time) Construct pipeline from near Outfall 005 into the Outfall 012 drainage area No physical changes or permitting changes to Outfall 012 Technical Analysis –Long Term Daily Water Balance 15 Long term daily calculations were used to characterize Outfall 005 & Little Mountain Creek due to limited data availability & no published set of critical conditions (e.g., 7Q10, 10-yr storm, etc.). −LMC daily flows estimated as USGS daily flows in Dutchmans Creek multiplied times ratio of drainage areas (5.62 / 3.44). Period of record was 19 years. −Outfall 005 daily flows at calculated using SCS Curve Number for surface runoff and “linear reservoir” for shallow subsurface water (similar to GWLF model). Coefficients in these calculations were refined based on observed field data. Dilution ratio in LMC were calculated as flow in LMC divided by discharge from Outfall 005 (flow at Outfall 005 minus water pumped to Badin Lake). Watershed Map 16 Long Term Daily Water Balance –Results 17 19 Year Period of Record Long Term Daily Water Balance –Results 18 Assumptions: Upstream fluoride concentration was assumed to be constant (0.09 mg/L) Effluent concentration was assumed to be constant for each trial Observations: Ratio of upstream LMC flow to Outfall 005 flow varies greatly on a daily basis With effluent concentration of 3.0 mg/L, the chronic criterion for fluoride (1.8 mg/L) will be maintained in LMC about 99.86% or 99.90% of the time with pumping up to 40 gpm or 180 gpm during June –October. The days when the chronic criterion was predicted to be exceeded in LMC represent scattered, short term (2 days or less) exposures to concentrations well below the acute fluoride criterion (24 mg/L). Long Term Daily Water Balance –Results 19 Path Forward –Schedule 20 Schedule Activity Oct 2019 Proposed Date Revised Date (July 2020 Draft SOC) Site Water Quality & Flow Data Collection May 29, 2020 NA Model Development & Technical Justification June 09, 2020 NA Initiate Plans & Specifications for diverting Outfall 005 to Outfall 012 June 17, 2020 June 30, 2020 NPDES Permit Modification Application and Technical Justification Submittal July 27, 2020 NA NPDES Permit Revision -NCDEQ & EPA Review, Public Comment Period, Revisions, Final Permit Issuance January 28, 2021 NA Complete Plans & Specifications NA June 30, 2021 Begin Construction NA October 31, 2021 End Construction, Procurement and Construction of Pumping System October 11, 2021 June 30, 2022 Attain Compliance with the Final Effluent Limitations in the Permit January 10,2022 July 31, 2022 *Current Permit Expires October 31, 2022 The Element of Possibility'