Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20141169 All Versions_Agenda 05252010_20100430a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Wkv>, BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONTI, JR GOVERNOR SECRETARY AGENDA 10:30 AM to 12:00 PM - Mark Pierce, Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT-Project Development TIP No. R-2514- US 17, Belgrade to New Bern Onslow and Jones Counties, Divisions 2 and 3 TEAM MEMBERS: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Eastern Concurrence Meeting Tuesday, May 25, 2010 Board Room Highway Building Raleigh, North Carolina ep% qr?, ? ?V ?D Tom Steffens, USACE Travis Wilson, WRC Mark Pierce, NCDOT Steve Sollod, DCM Chris Militscher, USEPA David Wainwright, DWQ Gary Jordan, USFWS Trish Murphey, DMF Karen Compton, USFS Renee Gledhill- Earley, SHPO Ron Sechler, NOAA - Fisheries Robert Will, Down East RPO (non-signatory) NCDOT TECHNICAL SUPPORT STAFF AND OTHER AGENCY STAFF: Neil Lassiter, Division 2 Ed Eatmon, Division 2 Jay Johnson, Division 2 Allen Pope, Division 3 Jackson Provost, Division 3 Mason Herndon, Division 3 John Lansford, Roadway Design Jim Speer, Roadway Design Dewayne Sykes, Roadway Design Jay Twisdale, Hydraulics K.J. Kim, Geotechnical Omar Azizi, Structures Fred Barkley, Right of Way Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental Virginia Mabry, TPM Stephen Lane, NCOENR-DCM Carlos Moya, TPB Thomas Stoddard, Program Development Matt Wilkerson, HEU Paul Mohler, HEU Ed Lewis, HEU Chris Rivenbark, NEU Lance Fontaine, NEU Elizabeth Lusk, NEU Colin Mellor, NEU Mary Pope Furr, HEU Steve Gurganus, HEU Herman Huang, HEU Rob Hanson, Project Development Brian Yamamoto, Project Development Missy Pair, PDEA Greg Thorpe, PDEA Wes Stafford, Wilbur Smith Associates Dave Wilver, Wilbur Smith Associates • The purpose of this meeting is to revisit CP3 for the Maysville Bypass based upon the observations by Fred Barkley (NCDOT R/W), Tom Steffens (USACE), and Mark Pierce (NCDOT Project Development) during a field meeting on February 10, 2010, and the updated Relocation Report dated March 30, 2010. MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH W ILMNGTON STREET 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 ?o US 17 `%o 0 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ONSLOW & JONES COUNTIES NORTH CAROLINA FROM SR 13301SR 1439 SOUTH OF BELGRADE TO THE JONES - CRAVEN COUNTY LINE STIP NUMBER R-2514 B, C & D May 25, 2010 SECTION 404/NEPA MERGER PROCESS CONCURRENCE POINT 3 REVISITED MEETING CORRIDOR SELECTION FOR THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROJECT FROM BELGRADE TO CHADWICK Prepared for: THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Prepared by: WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES 421 Fayetteville Street Mall Suite 1303 Raleigh, NC 27601 R-2514 B, C, & D US 17 Improvements Concurrence Point 3R Meeting Agenda Corridor Selection The Southern Portion (Maysville Bypass) of the Project From Belgrade to Chadwick 1) Purpose of this Meeting: The purpose is to present information to the Merger Process Team for Alternatives 2C and 2A and review concurrence on Point 3; 2) TIP Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to improve a 16 mile portion of US 17 between SR 1330 (Deppe Loop Road)/SR 1439 (Spring Hill Road) south of Belgrade and the New Bern Bypass near the Jones/Craven County line, south of New Bern to multi-lanes with Bypasses of Belgrade, Maysville and Pollocksville on new location. 3) Purpose & Need: Improve the capability of US 17 to meet its mandated objectives as part of the Interstate System, Strategic Highway Corridor Network, and North Carolina Strategic Corridor System. The existing roadway geometry, projected traffic, and projected land use conditions diminish US 17's ability to function efficiently. 4) Merger Process History and Current Project Status: A. August 24, 2006 Merger Team Informational Meeting - • The purpose was to present information to the Merger Process Team regarding the current status of R-2514 and design changes due to the Strategic Corridor Initiative. • Team agreed to divide the project into two halves to facilitate discussions on corridor selection. • It was determined that the merger process needed to look at CP2A and that bridging alternatives would be reviewed in the field. B. November 1, 2006 Field Meeting: • Held to review bridging alternatives southern section. • The meeting was successful and bridging lengths were modified to the Field Recommended lengths. C. Revised Preliminary Plans: • The revised plans incorporated SHC revisions (Interchanges, grade separations, superstreet design) and bridging design and recommendations from the November 15` CP2A field meeting. D. February 22, 2007 CP2A & 3 Meetings: • Held to review bridging options and corridor selection for southern section of the project. • Team verbally concurred to eliminate Alts 2 & 2B, but could not reach concurrence on Alt 2A vs. Alt 2C; the Elevation Process was initiated. E. March 6, 2007 Field Meeting: 0 Reviewed bridging alternatives for northern section. • New bridge lengths were recommended in the field and plans were modified after the meeting. F. March 7, 2007: • USACE requested updated Jurisdictional Determination prior to Corridor Selection G. April 12, 2007 CP2 Revisited Concurrence Meeting: • Chadwick to New Bern (verbal concurrence) team verbally concurred to eliminate all of the alternatives except for Alts 4D and 4E. H. February 11, 2008: • Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination issued by the USACE. • Final Jurisdictional Determination to be prepared after the least- environmentally-damaging-practical alternative is selected and the "Rapanos" forms are prepared. (compliance) May 22, 2008: • A Merger Process Team Concurrence Meeting was conducted to revisit CP2 (written concurrence for reduction of alternates for both bypasses) and CP2A (Chadwick to New Bern). • Two alternatives were carried forward for each section, 2A and 2C in the southern selection and 4D and 4E in the northern section. J. December 12, 2008: • A Merger Process Team Field Meeting was conducted to observe and document potential impacts from the two Maysville Bypass alternatives to Belgrade by Alternate 2C and to the high-quality wetlands associated with the White Oak River by Alternate 2A. K. December 16, 2008: • A Merger Process Team Concurrence Meeting was conducted to continue discussions on corridor selection for the Maysville Bypass based on the December 12, 2008 field observations. A majority of the team reiterated its support for Alternative 2C rather than direct impacts to the high-quality wetlands on Alternate 2A. The team was unable to concur on the Maysville Bypass L. April 16,2009: • A Merger Process Team Concurrence Meeting was conducted to continue discussions on corridor selection for the Maysville Bypass. NCDOT presented the preliminary design for the revised Alternate 2C with limited control of access during the meeting. Although the stream impacts increased, the team concurred on the revised Alternate 2C with limited control of access for the Maysville Bypass. M. December 1, 2009: • A Public Meeting was conducted in Maysville to allow local comment on corridor selection for the Maysville Bypass. NCDOT presented the preliminary design for the revised Alternate 2C with limited control of access during the meeting. Citizens were allowed to express their opinions on the Alternatives. 5) Current Status: • A Merger Process Team Concurrence Meeting is being held today (May 25, 2010) to revisit CP3 for Alternatives 2C and 2A (Belgrade to Maysville) 6) Action Items from Previous Meetings and Agency Request (Southern) Byrd Landfill Disposal Site Violation: • USACE has concluded that this property could be considered in its pre- violation condition for the purposes of impact assessment and corridor selection. • The Byrd Property is located in the southwest quadrant of Maysville and adjacent to Bypass Alternate 2C. Wildlife Underpass: • The Nature Conservancy, USFWS, USFS, NCDENR, and NCWRC requested that NCDOT construct a wildlife underpass between Maysville and the community of Chadwick. • NCDOT has conditionally agreed to construct a wildlife underpass as part of the R-2514 highway improvements project. • NCDOT is waiting for responses from stakeholders regarding design criteria and provisions Relocation Determination by NCDOT RM Unit: Values are calculated and illustrated in this packet comparing alternatives carried forward 7) Southern Section Alternatives Attachments: • Jurisdictional Areas (Wetlands) and Jurisdictional Areas (Streams) Comparison Table Alternative 2A • Jurisdictional Areas (Wetlands) and Jurisdictional Areas (Streams) Comparison Table Alternative 2C • Relocations and RAN Cost Estimate Worksheet C Matrix of Impacts for Alternatives 2A and 2C. Alternative 2A Graphic Alternative 2C Graphic Summary of Comments in Opposition to Alternate 2C ' Tally of Respondents' Support or Opposition to Maysville Bypass ' Municipal Resolutions in Support of Alternate 2A ai rr5p Ta.ua 3/3A?zvics REQUEST FOR R/W COST ESTIMATE DATE RECEIVED: Fem. 7b) 0 DISTRIBUTED: REVISION: P?56 ?A)o I.D.NO./ BREAK DESCRIPTION I'Z-2.514-6 f'2o 1'd5?? US-P) ?Yf ASS R/W FY_ A LTQriNhTd3 Silo M Sdun? ovF CONST FY_ 6L,E_an'.+pG Td Ajafx4 ur)cI AV9VIL(jMW FY_ CONST FY_ R/W FY CONST FY_ ACCESS: FULL C/A ® PARTIAL C/A ®NO CONTROL SCHEDULE UNFUND ? POST YRS ? UNFUND ? POST YRS . ? UNFUND ? POSTYRS ? WBS ELEMENT NUMBER: 3 (i4iF2_? 1.2. COUNTY: 01JSLC W 4?C,VC 3 ENGINEER: M?JCP)?-?12ce)P,e.? ?,DC31 .TIM ?Pae)z Pil .? 1QdADNUSyI(A/ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 3T)MATis' AL7WAJJA-rTS I, 2-/1 lI TYPE OF PLANS FURNISHED FOR ESTIMATE: P -5-W SCALe AL tjAlLd. PABLJM/NAN.I DATE DUE: Plnytcµ 7-010 PRIOR ESTIMATES OF LAND AND DAMAGES (WITH DATES): IF INCREASES OR DECREASES ARE SIGNIFICANT, PLEASE EXPLAIN: BASED ON PAST PROJECT HISTORICAL DATA, THE LAND AND DAMAGE FIGURES.HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED BY A FACTOR OF SO % TO INCLUDE CONDEMNATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE INCREASES THAT OCCUR DURING SETTLEMENT OF ALL PARCELS: THESE FIGURES PROJECT THE MOST ACCURATE ACQUISITION ESTIMATES FOR_ YEARS FROM THE. DATE OF THIS ESTIMATE. ESTIMATED BY: F715 COMPLETED DATE: MfiL201 O ALTERNATES ESTIMATED NO. OF PARCELS: 35 %3 40: q 0 To 1001 RESIDENTIAL RELOCATIONS: q __. 18 000 21. ?F20 d0 BUSINESS RELOCATIONS: -O- dar 8 ?., 15d !'ues58F9nAVg. LAND AND DAMAGE: 3 !n '- 9 1 000_ AC UISTION: -3$O Ooo-s 1 140 00d- TOTAL E S T I M A T E D R / f 3 C O S T . %345,0 i 1 126 000 29omot "CAVGATS"Ay%m Assumprlcws FON_ SLi cw-r AL1 %A/J46 r 6+AAAGG A•No Co(vrrwL o(¢ Accw6s Issues WILI- i6m RDmwAno® L47Wn.. THERE ARE NO FIGURES FOR UTILITY INVOLVEMENT ON THIS ESTIMATE AND NO PUE's. 0 C N ? O c cc 0 Z` C G1 C. = a 7 C cw vO ?c m O r'c rn c N O to 0 Y U ?( 0 m? ua ? c 0w Y C N C a i ai V?? d m ?a ?! ? Y LO G IA C O A CL E N C T CDa N 10 m N C N N 'O Y Y O Q O Q C. U) U) d ? ? N 04 C. N C. N Q 7 N O m m O N N w Q O Q 10 y . y C O O tCC 0. N a C. O U) °O o c ".aoF°-? U) m m y N - = t t?>"o O C y C. p) T N 3 7 to l? O Y ? (ns > r Y L Y 'D d N O V C ? t6 N d d Q N C N m C O r :; C.C rnC d (7 w 14 m N R C N R S 0- L U m O o.D O as O 4) CL CL a) C.> C .t, N O N d O d ? 07 C L L N N E M N N E C O O c N u) 0 C co t C m Y Y C N C N C (6 -p O U E m (0 ' Y _ E N C co N m t c c O O C N Q Q Q Q Q a Q Q Q Q Q Q ? ? m m m -O m Q N L "O C O c co ca E m 0 C c c N r- -0 N ( p L L . Q m CO C c 7 L E L 7 X 2 m N U p° m r- ? p m g . . o N - a .? cv ma) m J L) m ? Y p J " m U CL E C .C Y ( a0+ M c ' = a m Z 0 CL co U) m Y 2 _-° E ? y Co p V 0 Fa O U 'c 4 ? N J " 0 O 0 O p - ? ,C U C pp N c m CO C: N :3 C Y N m m O m N J m E a? ? c L O m p > . U t N - O N N N o c 0 O a C m N m (? m J N _j _ p 7 t of U c 3 N w N N N C O O U y U .C X N CO (= O " 0 Q -) co U O m m J 3 U r N CO V l CO I-d aO ? O r N M 7 LO CO r? ao m r r r r r r r r r r N N - rn a oQ- N U) U) 4) t d O m Q. > Q Qo O in Q U N N Q O Q U) .O ? ao U) r- 0 0 a O in M. c C4 0 a o. QaNN O L tp N O. O) T._ CL O m O L > a CL v) -4) N d N r d ? r O co is Q c 4) c 7 ? w m N U) m c m m O C m O (a O CL d G) O) CL > C w O 0) C m C O Y o 0 3 c 3 c c c ? ? E ? c co c E a) > C: ? Y o 3 o 3 o m a> > M m m m m m o m 'c m m m 0 ai o m m m m m m c O m C> co co "co c o c U m r U U o U N C 0 zz 'c to 0 ? ? m - ? m m ' 0 C - Z 0 O 0 0 0 O c U y (6 C L 0 fp D c co p i- C O 2 = U (n C O o a) O '- m C cr, cr, O U c m E cn -c- o - < 0 0 0 U Q C) = m m co m LL ? o m ? - -o 0 o 0 = U -? ? c7 Q g Y ? O e- N M V LL? co - i c 0 0 O , N M T LO ED Il- M 0 O r N M ? U) t0 1.- M N N N N N N N ,J c , 4 N co co M M M M M M M M V V V V V V V It 't N N Q O Q N \ 1 al O (ca Q > CL 0. O m' Q U N N Y _Y Q o Q U) U) a)a•C * OQ m G C O O co w L O 0 10- Q a d N a>'-=L 0. LIM T !? m em= L > Y L Y a o V O?a)ar CL N N N C df y 4) IV O R CL aI c a -m to ?a N R C ms o CL vi CO o CL d rn CL '> c w Owa)O 81 c m N N U c m E U) C = U C C O .•• C X a _ Z m (n _ o C o - ! n ' CL E m m p C m Y U N O - N a C 0 U N ? C C N O U - o E = o O U L m C U 0 C m O m > m p j m U Y U m a) Y U fn " m L co = m 'D ? a) - -o N - -o a) C m 3 = W _ ` N Y W U -o U o U cu m p p p m p -- O p m p Nd o p .` p p p 7 p p o W C w W p O U m ` C C .0 U 7 C L m N _C L a` ) m Q a) p cu > 0 O N C N (D L 0 N M m a) C ? c p co -0 o C Q L) m 3 c E '- :3 cu E Cl n ? . m m V p m ? p a ? L U Co C U Q m ? > ( g D m ? cn ` Q Y Y J n a 0 U 0 0 .-- N M "h LO (0 r` CO M 0 •- N M CO O O r N CO 'IT LO CO h ? ? to N LO M l0 (n m U) (O 0 CO 0 CO (O CO 0 CO (O (O I` r I? 1? r- I` j h N N Q O Q r Ip N N O m C d . > Q CO O U) Q U N N .+ w Q O Q d'O Lr Q W O. C C O cn w c O 04 " d o 0 Q 10 N 4) N '- = L O t to d C >. N C M m (n O rL !_ L Y L W C N N N d V) U) a r- d •a 4) O M a R CC t3) _ 3 ., N m lNC C ? L O CL >, CL t0 m ? l) O C= 4) C ) _ w O ? U) 4) Of C 10 c O Y _ E O C O ` C O N N N C O L _ Q U -O i C N (0 co C 0 ca (0 O " '6 2 ` N (?0 Y (6 E N f .1 N (0 LL O LL L .... LL m N •- U' O -O N Q 03 m 2 OJ "1 0) L - = = O 7 .0 LIJ LL C M LL LL O O - C C (D 0 =3 = O 2 = 0) (U) L N C = O 2 = (`0 7 C: O O "O 0) fn -_ N N L C7 N L O c0 O m M C c4 C : 'p Q Q O H Y CO N J W = 0? > > = C o M 7 U ? U Q Y U l C m ~ w N ai Q ? cn J E C f6 O OW rW NW MO ?0 tcoo t (cDo tl- 00 GO 00 ) 00 C) 0) 0 04 0 M 0 7 0 Lf) 0 (D 0 1,- 0 00 0 (3) 0 O 0 - r 0 CA 0 0 V 0 t0o 0 f0 e r r r N N Q O Q 0 N N U) d O m Q 0 Q M O ) O U Q U N N Y W Q OR U) N i a) Y co C m O O. a a O N .. c O " -00 « 0 Q 'O a) N a1 '? = L CL p) T !? CL m ' rn O?= s > .. d O U -a U) 2 L N d C d a) day's! c. c rn c c.._ m U) m U) U) U) m c m = O CL d) CL m - N O O d m O) a=tea/ c a> w OU) 0c i c m E E E E E E C > Y C C C C C c -0 m E 0 N C: O cn 0 a) N a) N 7 0 0 1 M L N U) 3 C U) m N a) N N N N C C L N C C O C a) C C Y - (D C C N C O a) ..• C -O O -O o E a .n Z a O L -mi O L ? ? O > O 7 w Y C .0 -E Y _? J ca ca C J O j J m m m m m m a c m e m ' Y Y m c Y Y L a) N -1 m 3 c -0 cr m L a? L a? L a? L a? L ) L L a? L O N U j a) Z (D .0 c C c m ' C o E c c -r- CD 2 m L co a) '? 'U ' '0 CU a C L . C u! L N O -? O a) E m L d a) N N m 0 a) a) . Q L 0 (D 1 0 Q c Q :3 In m CD = ? c Q O V a a V ? - Q a) a1 C C C C C C J Y n co rn O r N CO V Lo CO h CO 0) 0 ? N Cl) V u) CD r-- co 0) 0 ? N Cl) V t0 C 0 0 r' ?- N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M r r !. ?." T r r r r r r r r r r r r \..' r r {." r r r r r r T r N N _ Y L y Q OQ? N I N N CD -0 t " U) c O m O d 0. 0 Q CL O U) Q U N N Q O Q d'O co Q A Q Q Q J O w C O 3 -d6 wH Q :54) -omm a7 O. > N CL ?m? m oMY r ? .. m a' _ o u c?Hd N d N O ? (a m d C CD C C 2! " 3 .. U R (A m R C t o CL LA) u?,m_° o CL Ou) 4c O C U C o C m 3 3 3 N 3 N m -0 ? L ? U? (n a) O O L N L L O O O " _ m i m O m O o a m O cv m Y o O o O o L r ° O (0 Y 0 0 O d 3 L m so 0 (D m a) m o a) L ° ? o o ? a ? O 0 o 0 a o 0 ? r a n 0 m ? 2 - CL 'O C E >1 'O ? ca "O a N a d m d C 06 N Q) N C (U "°O C N t6 L co N IL N -O Q N O O (6 to aJ - ° L U 3 E N C f6 3 - ?/ 7 Cn _ T 2 7 ] Q C ° N Y (Ca 3 Co L 3 pZf L = U C N C a) O Y Co E cc ' L w -° a) cn L ? D U ? U) LL w ` co O d cD f? oC) O) O ? N M ? (O CO ? aC) O O r' N M V ?O (0 1,- M rn O W N M 7 M M M M C 7 V V 7 V V V V V CO (O (O (O CO (I7 U') Lo ) Lo 0 0 0 CD (D N N Q O Q V7 N N at O m C 0 Q a ,- O (J Q U N N w .. Q O Q N U) ^ c. `c° a a a O ti .? c 0 3 _Y N e0 O Q 'O al Q) Vl '- = L O t N N CL >.._ CL 3 m? U) °n> t m .. v _o 5 o i (a d CL w C d (D ) rn a . e c m ) 7 V7 m a ?= o a 4) >? 0 CL 010- O O y 2 " a= L d M.5 c = C O 0) O '? -O L N a) -O C O U) C ) a) (1) O 3 N N C le N L L ?- N N Z C U V N - N Q' 7 O "O 0 O E O o tin = 7 0 E . ' .L. • _ L„ .? C C = C ( 6 N 0 0 O - O of m ? 0 L 0 0 0 u) E U) L E E U) U) ) u) « U ) - a ) m o CO ? U U C co ) U u u) c :° (D N a) ) O e c a) L rn C U (u co t D w r o N O J p L a - .V .C ? ? m N Q cu Y J ? L a) L i LL O U j O O U -5 76 z U) U ? U (n tn ' ? lO VJ N M a 1 0 T N M 7 10 (O I? a0 0) O T N M V In CO I- c0 0 0 T N M 0 0 0 0 0 ? n N ? h n r ti r ? M W ap M aD W W 00 00 00 0 Q) 0) m T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T N N Q o Q r ol U) V) r- N Q O m > Q CL O (/ Q U N N Y 4n Q o Q d a t (n r- 0 a m CL CL a O U) 0 c 0 4-0 °- Q a d d 0 -=t d 0 U) CL T .- CL (C ? U) O L d Y a d _ O IL) 0" 'ra C ` y d fA C h a 0 ?9 w Q- Cp>C C L w N N N M C , (6 t O CL m - N O CL R ? rn C.-5 c w O to drn C ?o ?. c `o (/7 (6 C U) ' o o m m m a C :3 L C °n C u°, a? o N ai Q1 L N y N C? C N m °? C co aEi C O aEi >1 C3 0 E L O H L C p O O (n O Y C3 Y m N ? 30: I N L > > = - co C C .2 C 0 O ~ L N d 0 C: a U1 :3 C C U N L N C B C7 - N C N > C N N L U d m Co N N O M .n C o C M O C C U L d O 0 - C) .Y.. C (6 d C C d 0 U 'C d s N N (D (0 N N w d ? ? 0 ? H ? C M U Co C (1) co d m L O C a> m L U w i m Q m a 0 ? U 0 ? O) (A O CO W 1? m 00 0) 0) 0 0 0 N 0 M 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 O 0 O ?- N M ?7 ? , (O e I? e OO ? O ? O N e- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (n A W N O 07 3 S 3 0- 7 S _D S' 0 z3-0'< (,D -0 ai m Q -• °? (7 3 (0 n - 3 +n (n (n c o a <.co ? a 3 °L CD N co : 7 - -. S 3< -0(0 O 0 CL p O CD (D N O o' 0 a N m 0- cr -O ,.,. - SI< 3 C 0 (n n CD 0 w CD S -U U-) CD - -? N w CD v .? .? 0 r » l N MR O 3 7? O O N Cn :E CD Cr 3 <• 3 0 a S w 3 CD 3 O N 7 < 0 C C CL 3 CD O C1 0. - 3 0 < m a C1 (D c (D CD W (D O C1.0 0 CD (p CD C N C1 .y. S X? O-(D p L1? N ..- MN O I 1 o .3 CD CD o c ? 3 Q a o ?ch 3 ? 0 f 33(n ?.C (D 3 CD -0 (D -w W O O O S 3 I CD Q CD 0 (n a 3 0 " 3. ° 0 d 0 0 CD CD >< W o 030 3--o»o3 (Q CL CL CD CL Om I< -oo d:N=N=O .'.. 7 N CD CD 3 0 j C1 I< CD p- S w 3 3 _-0 O O N O o O CD CD 07 Dc? ?ma3D3 CD o (n N CD O CD <, N 3 3 O- 3 O C 3• = C1 (n (D 0 0 0 7 7 Q 3 p1 (n U) O j 0 O a) a 3 CD S C ,.. O G S 3 , O (D 0 0 N CD -4. CD O O S np 0(D CL CCD =r D(now0 3 3 W N 3 3 p 3 0 0 j'o o (0n v ?. 0 =r =) m m v 3 S 0 0- (D 3 n j d .3.. (o N O C1 CL 3 C .+ CO S 3 .+ CD d y 3 (n G S W (D S ,.. S -* O- f/i CD `G CS (D S CD S O CD p 3 (D (n S y 0 (n 3 o 3 30 3 3 (Q DS o :E (D a -'O-0-CCD CD N CD 3 (D O < S DCD 3 0 1^O.0 3 0) ? a 7 -- (SD a d 03 Q 0-0 =' r 0 to O N N S O CL D (A c ?. 3 W 0- C, iv : ns o (n CD CD 3 0 CD CL w I< 0 0) C: T 0 M CD :D 30a 3c =r 0. 0 cn 0) < Cl- (D C1 - 7 Cr O (D CD CD O CD p: v ^. 0 N p< ,. 6 -0 CL CD =r O 2 0) 7 0 ? ((D 0 CD -0 CD = 10 N cn :T o (n 3 (Sp (n 3 CD 0 3 H (p E o CD (D (D 2 C0 3 CD CD v (D 0 Z 0 CD (n 90 n 0) O 0) O N f0 Cl O m y S = <. y (D O W O O S paj 7 N y (n d Ul 1 C m 0. (D (n ?a m w O - 10. CL < 5 " (n d d o -0 IR to -0 n O N f SD CD G. y ( 0 0 m D ? 0. N O C a a a O 3 (On OD y a N D 0 D n D (n O c a a o 0'a a) < O 3 0 G H fA N ADD D ?M D n N (D W V CA F Z S O N a N ? CD CD 7 7 R • C fU S 0 (n(? S = ?: CD O T ? ? 3 'O d 3 p 1 N N 3• D (0 7 < y- CU b N 3 f/? O N (a 3o C N . :• 0 O 7• CD l< CD Q CD 0 ? O N S N ' -l ? N d 0 N a) ,.;' c .. O 'z CD N C1 3 O 3 O C a CD CD W CD C O C. cn 2 -? _0 d =r 0 0 o 0. O C1 c cr CD ? O c 0) ? =3 •. O CD - C _ (Q CD 7 CD O D (D O Z CD N - N N Cn O N . CL '-' O . • X CD O 0 O O 0 O C j- N I c _0 w O O (n _« 7 (D ., 0 CD 0 ? D n ? ? co CD - 0 -« cD D 3=r m co D o w (Z 0 CD CL 33 F ;z CD 0 0 3 CD 3 3 S> CD CD 3 0 -4 3 (D D o O' l N c N D ° CD W Cp C D - CD " N N 3 0 (p ' ? O En 3 0 f D p? 'O CD N o n . Om 3 0 < g N 7 N CD ' . - CD O (D ... S CD o _0 D CD s en =3 0 _ CD y 00 O -n ( N < (n o c CL CD D - =r a O < N < 0 7c CD 0. n fD ?-0 CD m Z7 3 o CD O 0 D ( N D) 3 N .3. C D < CD CD fD m D 3 C D x m o (D ° CD 5 7 3 3 CD O Q O c w CD ° CD O = CD C CD Dy 7 a - ?m CD a o - Q o 0 CD CL S C1 Cu m 3 w CL '0 c CD - - CD v, (D 0 r. C2 (D CD CD CL 3 a CD 0 3 o S - CD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JOSEPH F. WIU2INS. Chairman 541 Rlchlardc Rd. Trenon, NO 2^8595 SONDRA IPOCK RIGGS. Vice Chairman 88211i98ACwo Pd. PoIbC4iver, NO 28573 CHARLES BATTLE. JR. PO. Baz 158 Caminn. NO 2K522 MIKE HADDOCK 2314 Wyse Pork Rc. Trenton. NO 28585 JESSIE RAY EUS ANKS P.O. Bo. 25 POIIocksvllle, NO 28573 County of Jones POST OFFICE BOX 340 TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28585 (252) 448-7571 FAX (252) 448-1072 COUNTY ATTORNEY JIMMIE S. HICKS PO.Orawer Beg Nttx Bern. NO 28553 CLERK TO THE BOARD JENNIFER GRAY P.O. Bev; 5 rr.Wn. NO 285,15 WEBSNE: .On95. 11.10. "oI M;onosmun y0co.pnes.n2o5 Resolution of Support for Alternative 2A of the Proposed Route of the Maysville-Belgrade By-Pass that is a part of the R-2514 B Project WHEREAS, Highway 17 through North Carolina is a critical freeway for the movement of people, goods, and services; and WHEREAS, the State Transportation Improvement Program lists numerous projects to improve the safety and increase mobility throughout the Highway 17 corridor; and WHEREAS, the project R-2514 B is one such project that is designed to move traffic safely and efficiently through the Maysville and Belgrade areas of Jones and Onslow counties; and WHEREAS, the current preferred design alternative, referred to as "2C", severely impacts the community of Belgrade by requiring 36 relocations of residences or businesses, would impact 2 cemeteries, and would place an interchange in the center of the community; and WHEREAS, the design alternative referred to as "2A", greatly reduces the impact to the community by requiring far fewer relocations, and would create a true 'by-pass' of both the Maysville and Belgrade communities; and WHEREAS, design alternative "2A" will allow for better control of access and therefore better meet the goals of the Strategic Highway Corridor initiative, of which Highway 17 is a part. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Jones County Board of Commissioners supports the design alternative "2A" over alternative " 2C" and encourages all federal and state agencies involved to consider "2A" as the preferred alternative. ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Jones County Board of Commissioners on February 15, A.21 \`S `lr: Date up-, Clerk to the Bo[<lr =':-=a_=',;i _CAKI ( b Date i)SU27-1aQ 12a0 COUNTY MANAGER FRANKY J. HOWAHO /'t-Zaj J4- P.O. Box NO Tmnlon. NC 20583 Resolution No. 2010-003 A Resolution by the Town of Maysville Board of Commissioners in Support of Alternative 2A of the Proposed Route of the Maysville-Belgrade By-Pass that is a part of the R-2514 B Project WHEREAS, Highway 17 through North Carolina is a critical freeway for the movement of people, goods, and services; and WHEREAS, the State Transportation hnprovenrent Program lists numerous projects to improve the safety and increase mobility throughout the Highway 17 corridor; and WHEREAS, the project R-2514 B is one such project that is designed to move traffic safely and efficiently through the Maysville and Belgrade areas of Jones mid Onslow counties; and WHEREAS, the current preferred design alternative, referred to as "20", severely impacts the community of Belgrade by requiring 36 relocations of residences or businesses, would impact 2 cemeteries, and would place an interchange in the center of the community; and WHEREAS, the design alternative referred to as "2A", greatly reduces the impact to the community by requiring far fewer relocations, and would create a true `by-pass' of both the Maysville and Belgrade communities; and WHEREAS, design alternative "2A" will allow for better control of access and therefore better meet the goals of the Strategic Highway Corridor initiative, of which Highway 17 is a part. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Town of Maysville Board of Cor unissioners supports the design alternative "2A" over alternative "20" and encourages all federal and state agencies involved to consider "2A" as the preferred alternative. ADOPTED at the special meeting of the Town of Maysville Board of Commissioners on February 18, 20]0, Jar es D.?Ianper Date Mayor Attest: OJJ?_ /tneC--k_04- a 1?) t o Dale Gurganus-McC Ilough Date Town Clerk DOWN EAST RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Resolution of Support for Alternative 2A of the Proposed Route of the Maysville-Belgrade By-Pass that is a part of the R-2514 B Project WHEREAS, Highway 17 through North Carolina is a critical freeway for the movement of people, goods, and services; and WHEREAS, the State Transportation Improvement Program lists numerous projects to improve the safety and increase mobility throughout the Highway 17 corridor; and WHEREAS, the project R-2514 B is one such project that is designed to move traffic safely and efficiently through the Maysville and Belgrade areas of Jones and Onslow counties; and WHEREAS, the current preferred design alternative, referred to as "2C", severely impacts the community of Belgrade by requiring 36 relocations of residences or businesses, would impact 2 cemeteries, and would place an interchange in the center of the community; and WHEREAS, the design alternative referred to as "2A", greatly reduces the impact to the community by requiring far fewer relocations, and would create a true `by-pass' of both the Maysville and Belgrade communities; and WHEREAS, design alternative "2A" will allow for better control of access and therefore better meet the goals of the Strategic Highway Corridor initiative, of which Highway 17 is a part. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Down East Rural Planning Organization's Transportation Advisory Committee supports the design alternative "2A" over alternative " 2C" and encourages all federal and state agencies involved to consider "2A" as the preferred alternative. ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Transportation Advisory Committee on January 26, 2010. oj)_,Sax,Ellis Banks Chair / Down East RPOOTAC /?o?A Robert Will Down East RPO Coordinator ,,? -;3 -1d Date Z-Z3-l0 Date SERVING CARTERET * CRAVEN * JONES * ONSLOW * PAMLICO COUNTIES r? '' a a -2S ?4 ® N EAST RURAL TRANSPORTATION BANNING ORGANIZATION EASTERN CAROLINA COUNCIL • PO BOX 1717 • NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA 28563 (P) 252/638-3185 X3002 0 (F) 252/638-3187 February 23, 2010 To Whom It May Concern: At the regular meeting of the Down East Rural Planning Organization (DERPO) on January 26, 2010 the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) passed a resolution supporting the design alternative `2A' of the proposed route of the Maysville-Belgrade by-pass that is a pert of the transportation project R-25-14B. Enclosed is a copy of the resolution. The DERPO endorses alternative 2A because it will provide for a true `by-pass' of Maysville and Belgrade, thus requiring far fewer relocations of residents and businesses. Additionally, the proposed route would provide for better control of access which creates a safer roadway and is consistent with the goals of NCDOT's Strategic Highway Corridor initiative. The RPO strongly encourages your jurisdiction to support alternative 2A by passing a similar resolution and sending copies to: and Mr. Mark Pierce, P.E., Project Planning Engineer NCDOT.Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 Mr. Thomas Steffens ACOE Washington Regulatory Field Office Post Office Box 1000 Washington NC, 27889-1000. If you have any questions please email me: rNvill@eccog.org or call at the number above. Sincerely? /y/?? f?r Robert Will `U DERPO Coordinator Cc: Jones County Onslow County Mark Pierce, NCDOT Thomas Steffens, ACOE Marc Finlayson, Hwy. 17 Assn. Rep. George Cleveland The Town of Polloeksville The Town of Maysville Congressman Walter Jones Senator Harry Brown Rep. Pat McEtdraft Rep. Robert Grady SERVING CARTERET 4 CRAVEN * [ONES 4 ONSLOW # PAMLICO COUNTIES f Q z Q N m H za W ? J a Q ? N 5 W 3 ? n Z i m P P P P Y P n N m Q Q N N Q m m P N N t W N N N N O b N Ol ? O b (p lp ?m OI P ? (O V ? ? ? ? b O A m O f0 0 O Q 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O ^ O O O O O !4 N O O O m 0 ? ? O 0 m 0 0 0 0 ? Q ? I N N n ? r ? e- N 10 n ? n ? 0 ? m n p 0 (O Q U A b ` (O N N O A O ? m n ? N ? A N N ? m m m ?p b J ? P N VJ ? N b ? N N P b M f0 m W " O m t0 ? H O f t7 N Q F C w L ? I O N m m ° M v m Ni ? OI y n t7 n m N O ? t+i P 0 P y nj m (7 m N O Oi N m A '- N Q b O+ m [V N A yrj W N fV b ?] b N b 0 (0 0? fD m N N b m W p N b p m n P N N l I C 2 O N 1 b b . N O N v fp A ? N m m m P Q Q b fD N N N 9 r a a e n. t? V. y 1 1 a" r t tl V V V\ >4y Y N S 7 N W N 0 O) ? o m m U O N N Q N z Z p d a 5 z O a N C a C a U v N C v $ n? s 'o w n N U W D] 0 v c ?? -n ? r n n 0 0 M m 0 0 NN ww ma W K 7 U K N rc O Q w z J Q Y m Q y N U wd a? a? m 0 z 0 z 5 tll W O Q ?- t0 t0 ^ m O) OI O N N 1? I Cl O N I E I I ?- W N F] m N N U O O O O n'i N n] N ? O O O N O Q N N O 0] O 0 O 0 0 1? ? 0 O (O M N 0 0 O 0 W 0 0 O 0 N Q i I i K I W F m 1? N 0 m t0 fp r E O? N N O N Q Q N N m N m 1? M ??(] h m ? ? 0 ? 1? Oi N C O O O U W Ql m N N N I? O S O N 0 t0 N O O O] O r ? m ? Q Q 1A 1` ? m m m N f0 O t+l r I? Q J N d' ? N N N 0 N OJ ? l7 0 V l7 0 ? Q ? 1? OI ? N ? 01 N Rl f C] N O N N 1` t7 ? N Q F a o I I I l J t n K ? /1 P EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO THE 25 MAY 2010 MERGER MEETING Wetland impacts remain the same: Alt 2C = 16.74 acres vs Alt 2A = 26.39 acres Difference is Alt 2A will impact 9.65 acres of medium to low graded wetlands. Of the 9.65 acres, 8.71 acres are located in managed Lpine plantation. P1 // ,,? Stream impacts have changed: Alt 2A = 1564.69 linear feet vs Alt C = 2206.31 linear feet. Difference is Alt 2C now impacts 641.67 linear feet more than Alt 2 A, a reduction from the 966.5 foot difference we've been looking at. A detailed investigation found an error in DOTs calculations that's been carried through since CP3. Grave impacts have changed: Alt 2A = 4 graves (Collins-Conway) vs Alt 2C = 41 graves. Alt 2C impacts 37 graves (Parker-Mills) plus the 4 graves (Collins-Conway); total 41 graves. DOT has been using old data from the DEIS. I found the new numbers, they, comefrom the archaeological investigation data provided in the Sec 106 review. The Belgrade Volunteer Firehouse in Alt 2C is not counted as a relocation. Due to its status as a "non-profit", DOT/ROW does not consider this a reportable relocation because a firehouse-is not a business or a residence. However, the estimated cost of obtaining the real estate is included in the ROW cost projections. The cost and extensive logistics of moving afirehouse are not included, they are negotiated later in the acquisition process. All other impacts and numbers in the impact summary table appear to be valid. 5. Select Alt 2A Instead: (We received numerous responses similar to the following in which they requested Alternate 2A without a specific reason.) "Please take another look and use Alternate Route 2A, as I think this would be a much better route." "Please do not go with the alt 2c route - instead please go with the original all 2a as promised to bypass Maysville." 6. Belgrade Community Cohesion: "...will destroy the Community of Belgrade and divide Maysville and Belgrade." 'What good is a road if it's not designed around the people?" "Please leave our town in one piece." "The new route destroys our cemetery, the fire department, the campgrounds, several dozen homes and numerous properties... If the originally proposed route had been utilized, none of this would have to happen... The new route ruins Maysville and essentially wipes out Belgrade." "...takes out twenty businesses and residences along the existing road..." "...be a ghost town." "I'm in favor of 2A in order to keep myjob." "...14 businesses, 32 residences, 3 mobile home parks, fishing ponds, campground will be effected..." "To demolish the number of homes and businesses that 2C proposes is unconscionable!" "I planned to retire and live in peace in Belgrade, but it looks like I might have to look elsewhere to buy another house." ' "...alt 2c it will ruin many businesses and homes. l know that bigger cities do not think about the rural towns but we do count. Please do not ruin the town of Maysville, campground, cemetery etc. Please hear the voices of the little people!!!!" ....over 125 new families in five years and more houses being built every day, we now have the potential to grow." 'We love our quiet community and will do everything possible to keep it that way. You need to go elsewhere." "...don't want to look at a highway separating our community." "...in favor of preserving Belgrade..." R-2514: Maysville Bypass Public Hearing Summary of Comments in Opposition to Alternate 2C Based upon comments received through January 7, 2010 by Mark Pierce, P.E., Project Planning Engineer 1. Petition including 739 individuals against Alternate 2C (collected and submitted by Mr. Gregg Carpitano, property owner in Belgrade): "Maysville and Belgrade residents against the destruction of our homes and businesses due to the route of the road expansion. We do not want all 2C as proposed which will destroy our town, homes, cemetery, and campgrounds. We have been told since 2003 that route 2A was going to be the route taken. Now as told to me by Raleigh due to a change in project managers the route is going to be changed, which is unacceptable to all the signed residents, property owners, and business owners. Why were we not involved in this change? No one has approached us except to get ready to move by 2012. The all route 2A would not disturb any homes or businesses. What is going on??? We want answers, and changes to this horrible plan now!" 2. Petition including 43 individuals against Alternate 2C (collected and submitted by Mr. John Byrd, property owner in Maysville): "We, the citizens of Maysville and Belgrade, are concerned about the Hwy 17 Bypass proposal that will be coming through our communities. We feel the roadway plan that would be more beneficial for us would be the Alternate 2A plan." 3. Public not involved in Corridor Selection: "...knew nothing of the route of the road... very surprised to see what is going on." 'We are all opposed at the apparent disregard that we are receiving as far as input on where or how this highway project should be routed." "I cannot believe that you the State of NC is trying to pull a fast one, again." 4. Service Life: "A highway that will be obsolete and useless within 2Y to 5 years. Why not do it right the first time and use 2A as planned in the beginning." "...not a good plan... what about a deeper bypass?" 7. Construction Nuisance & Safety of the Community . "...with the widening of an existing major roadway through the heart of the neighborhood that has many points of ingress and egress and many businesses in use, the introduction of heavy construction equipment, trucks and workers will provide for a much less safe environment for both workers and residents than would be the case for construction that would occur in the wooded and agricultural areas of Alternate 2A." "Construction activity such as this will result in noise, mud and dust pollution for a lengthy duration. This will cause further disruption to the daily lives of the people who live, work and do business in this community. Please visualize the impact." 8. Business Impacts "The construction and permanent routing will have a severe negative financial impact on the livelihood of the businesses currently operating along the corridor. Customers will go to great lengths to avoid construction congestion and severely restricted access and the loss of business for those which may survive the construction could be crippling." 9. Wetland Impacts vs. Human Impacts "To have a little more "impact" on wetlands and/or have that be more costly(?) is a proper and compassionate expense to bear as responsible citizens of N. C." "I'm all for being part of the green movement, but it seems a little far-fetched that so many peoples' lives have to be uprooted in order to save wetlands, (or so I'm told)." "...urge you to use the alternate route and bypass Belgrade. Please do not disturb our little community. Surely people and property are more important than a few miles of wet-lands." "It is widely known that it is not possible to reasonably compare the human personal, physical, mental and financial impacts or value of the wetlands that may be impacted. While the wetlands certainly are important to be protected they are not human. If it is deemed more important to protect the wetlands then I encourage the final decision making authority to consider the other' alternative that is always available for consideration - do nothing." "It seems less harmful and more logical to replace 11 acres of wetlands along the affected Trent River than to disrupt the lives of families that must relocate their homes and/or businesses to accommodate regional and national needs." (The Banks Family, who owns, operates, and maintains the campground and ponds adjacent to the White Oak River and US 17, provided the following comment and are promoting the environmental quality of the features on their property that would be impacted by Alternate 2C.) "...campground and our ponds are like a wildlife sanctuary for fish, turtles, squirrels, rabbits, deer, birds, and even two bald eagles that feed in our lakes every day." 10. Mills-Parker Cemetery & another cemetery: "I have a husband, parents, grandparents, and great grandparents buried there." "My dad and grandparents are buried in the cemetery and my mom has a lot there also. "...takes out... two family cemeteries..." "I think it will be a disgrace if the cemetery is disturbed in any way!" 11. Maysville/Belgrade Flea Market: "Alt 2C will put me and others out of business... nice community is getting ready to be destroyed." 12. New Subdivision in Corridor: (Developer/builder has constructed and sold three or four new homes in the path of the common corridor for Alternates 2A and 2C on the west side of Maysville. Homebuyers were not aware of the proposed highway prior to our corridor selection announcement.) "Not only does it destroy my home that is less than a year old, but it will destroy multiple homes, businesses, a camp site, and the town's cemetery. This highway will nearly wipe out the town of Belgrade and part of Maysville. Yet, there is another proposed route that swings further around our city that will only disturb two homes. The thing that bothers us most of all is that we were allowed to buy this land and get a building permit and no one ever mentioned a thing to us about the highway." 13. Belgrade United Methodist Church: (Although we conducted the Maysville Bypass Public Hearing on 12/1/2009 and responded to numerous requests for project information, some citizens are still basing their comments on conjecture that the Belgrade United Methodist Church will be impacted. The church will not impacted by the current preliminary design for Alternate 2C.) "...takes out... a church." "I am a life time member." 14. Closure of Existing US 17 Bridge over White Oak River: .don't want to have to get onto the bypass and then exit to go into Maysville." "...who wants to go halfway to Jacksonville to pick up a service road to go back threw Belgrade to get to Maysville. (Where l work.) A quick drive to the post office, will be no more. " 'If the existing bridge on 17 has to be removed at some point in time, then Alternate 2A will create even more of negative impact on businesses in both Belgrade and Maysville. I think as the decision process is being reviewed you must consider the immediate cost of the project, but you have to look at the future economic impact on businesses. There are more businesses in Maysville than in Belgrade and the farther away the access to the businesses the less people will patronize. No one welcomes change when it has an effect on them personally. Individuals and businesses that are in the direct path will receive compensation. There is not any compensation for business that slowly loose money and eventually close their doors due to the impact of the bypass." 15. Emergency Response Times between Belgrade and Maysville: "The rescue Squad in Maysville responds to calls in Belgrade and the Fire Depts help each other. (This happened on Dec. 29). Alternative 2C would make the response time increase for emergency vehicles." I ? v N I I N Ol v a a a E a LL a . W Vf to N Vf H ? Y OJ H N N c-I N ? m d N N N N N ? fN U U S? C n O t y O d Y Y C U NI O O N r-I N O ? ? NI tD l0 ? Ol ? l0 O 3 O m O m d N 7 i N O Y O Y 0 O y N M O O d f0 .--I N N c-I 00 N 'O U N rl N 'p U 's -4 N N rw r" N O N O C y O y m AD 0 AD 00 O ?n `^ m oo n m OI U 30- I? ' ' r ' O OI H tJ N V V r u 1 u 1 u 1 1 1 3 0l N N N 0 l V1 V1 m -? K V V OC U . t C O O V Y m CA ? u Y m m m m I L O Ol r-1 N N N I O m l0 N N U C ^ U m m O O V V N Y lp u 111 f\ to V V H C E Y N u l0 1? ri c-1 j-i a 4 lv m .-I n io m ?n m .-? o m m 0 00 .? 0) ?n ?n v 00 m O In In In J. E N a m rl rl ~. N N N N N N N N O N O YI C IN !? ?I N m V m N m I m C c !? 4 N N rz rz h it 6 L M ?' O m E 00 N wm N N lD N tD N A Y N j E N rl 4 V .-1 A q e-1 us e q M U6 I 3 I Ol ? d J •a+ C Q Q Q Q Q Q l+ C U U U U U U E N N N N N N N N N N N N Q j I Q u N 0CA j Oq C 00 C U1N 0A C V N OD C 00 C Oq C N N bO C i I O? ? v v I v ? v O? v v I v ? f v i 0 0 of 0 ° o 000 I 0 p y Vt l O NO pN O O N ° ON D ° O O Y p CA N N Y O N \ N N N O '. N N W W ti u\i m° N N 00 n ti N ' ? ? N \ I \ \ \ N \ N i CA N 1 CA ti r-I if1 N ti. 01 I `-I V1 .' ?r W Q z rc w J Q U m N r U = a w ? rQ J W Q N O a W 3 Y 2 F m N N n m Q ? N N b m n M M n N b M Q Q Q Q O Q n N M d d N N d m M Q N N 3 v is al is N W ' C ? N b n m b 0 Q 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N O 0 N 0 N m O? O O b m f0 O f0 m m 0) O? d n W Q ? ? ? O O O O O O O ? O O O N ? O O f0 ? ? 0 0 0 ? 0 ? t.; a w N ? b n N O M ? m b m n O O m r Q n ? N b ? n n n N n O N E O b O U m b N N n N O O M n Ol M IA O N N N n m m N ? Nm t"! M M m m M Q J W H ? ? b m N N ? ? d N m ? D) ? ? ? N ? ? N F a o L' ? ? d m ? " b b "' m ry b m m m o m m d d ro N m b m! m ° ?,j d M m rn °' n n `? n c ? m ? ? N d Q d Q m m o N n m Q m ? uNi N a m Q m Q N 10 N b O m m? y f0 m N N m M W Q N N Q m N ?. si f O z 0 N Q N (p n m Oi ? ? n N 0) N M N M N M O Q m Q Of Q m b m (O O N N N N l>? U N W N m rn ? o m m U O N N Q z 'O O p a a a z O a J d E a N h Y V O a m m V N Cm m V a ? H m e .m 0 wm O N r m m C m m Or n n 00 mm NN W W sa jvol.A No l7d/)Q h F v h n? w }? ah W 0 ? O ? W N ? v N V ? k, Z n o m (D C N . a 3 w a C C CD 0 N O O O O v w w c o 0 ? 3 n I° q kA N T ' n ? { z J C c C W 0 N W v m ? a a N N ti ? 0 13 .Nw CD m N A A 3 m G , N co Er o 0 0 o N O CL o w W o O. rn u D x r o?m t° ? o N m 3 0 rn rn ^. ?a O A (wp tll. I}?i CL tug' ? _ 3 ? m .Y' N d S A v 0 3 N T W a T p O 0 O p (D r O O N O a o j N O . x?? a `D x c CL rn w ..N. N w N rn 7 ? O N y, A N (') w N w v » v -? p 0 A 1 N m m M m m m o N N O) N N N c0 ?, 3 vzTm o a 3 °o o m 00 a 3 ? z - aY < _4' D N 0 ? h w qw, C b H , s. _ Q is f Z0 CD N fD a N CD a CD CL c ? O s CD n N O O ° o J d 7 d O p Cl) (a D c D c A (D N N N w W Q m D < v .?+ N A A 3 N "'? w CD N f0 y V S v 'o 00 0 o CL -I °ow W 0- a rn 2 to II n r O > C (D O > N O co O S 3 ? > rn N rn m 1 ?v O A w N C1 7 0 N a N 3 O rn x d m 61 A V N 3 n a A ID r N.aa 3 0 0 3 o g ' ?' x a D #c a a 3 mo W W o ?0 69 > A N 0 w CD O U to o .? Cil 00 CAV a) r m N C w 0 d 0 10 K ca C N N rn O m N N <o w 3 9z? o N d c 3 0 o o P..m Ow y ? m a a C 0. o m ci W ._ K - 7 a 9 Q Z y ? E _ U 9 Q s s j a LU 7 V L - ? x ; 2 ? U 7 ? r w O ? U m U W p? U O E v o D - _ uj 9 D N V`J r H ? ? E ? v > c ° _ Q a U - s 1 E 5 a N 'D yr °c z o m ' ?m ? Sv N N 1 d c m N O I.i. N N N N Q d y r :o c ` N d m m c c ? y ? W m d Q Q ? O m Y Q Q O O U `O E E J E E J J d p m ? a a a o Iw o O D O m O z Q z T O o ? n O 4 y in a O Z ? a ? ? P r ? ? ? m m o m c ,^ v E D c E C U CL M W d m ? J I I I 1 1110 ' I • I 4- .?.- 1, C ` y Jl(/ - 1 V 1 .1 1 r' I ,\ rr ? I II 1 I II I I I vry I ? ? 41 y 'I yn TniY ?Va - Ijll Q ?? ??% I ? a ) b ! J N ? • I t L:i ?u l ssva AB 31-1IASAVW OZ 3AIIVNN3ilV re-•.? t ? ?"; 'yam{, . ?4 ?+fc'',.y?' ? 4y,„T! .trz`? ?? ? vv?r 11%. "IN J i .a y:,. rK?jy?„ .,?}7k?; re's •?`.i`r; At ti r? 'f'ir A? `7 1*6 r % e t e??SZ-b LI.sn SSac9d:!R- •^,}?rW VZ3AIIVNN31-1V (!) Q W v b' n sue. ,, ??''?? ?! E a 03 Q: C) -J J*Wl t??17 F,1 _ 3'?C?'iit F..Fd r rr r J u° ` 6 G u co p w 00 N> L g 3 a` +E. h ?.' n V F ? . l? vi. ?:1 •a r r-m.- V t1J Z Q -i?1 ? ,? .J'r"t` 5 "?+?.'3X` '? ??? '1,??? ???t `y' 1 ?°"l'R1I•'"'... w ? T p Z N ?!??X r S N n j r ? o rc .9 .o??. - ]?y^'yM !•..~i'r'.1. j: /^ Z W 'Z W R-' fh IL (1 r1.Y ^1 r1 1 U) LL Z 'Wilt K ?wr,?* C?'N? tif? Tfr ty?'4, J. . - ' JR Vi r , l?r+. .1 f / J" ?ih ub? , f r ?Iy ili'i3cJ ? 9 t? IT .? 1' ?+r'K: ??. a Amman IfS?r r''fi''???'