NC0024538_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

Water. Resources
Environmental Quality
Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Dear Ms. Jackson:
ROY COOPER
F�LE
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
December 22, 2017
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the
City of Shelby's Industrial Pretreatment Program on December 15, 2017, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell
at [phone], or via email at wes.bellancdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
3 W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Vivien Zhong, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
-ii
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality) Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 16l0 East Center Avenue, Suite 3101 A400resville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
K" rPRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
Water Resource s
anva.m:rtet�� oun.rn
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Jordan Jackson
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 5/18/16 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ®NA
ICIS CODING
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
NCA02453R 12/15/17
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
5
8. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired lUP?
0
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
0
14. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
0
15. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
3
16. Number CIUs in SNC?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during N/A
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for Not Pu
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES ® NO
❑ YES ® NO
)lished: N/A
N/A
[-]YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Elemejin
their files, complete with supporting documents and co of PERCS A roval Letter, and dates consistent with Pro am Info:
Program Element Last Submittal Received Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file?
Date In file
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis A
12/2/16
® Yes ❑ No
2/24/17
® Yes ❑ No
6/1/20
Industrial Waste SurveyIWS
3/20/14
® Yes ❑ No
6/17/14
® Yes ❑ No
3/30/19
Sewer Use Ordinance SUO
9/7/11
® Yes ❑ No
9/23/11
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan RP
115111
® Yes ❑ No.
12/22/11
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LIMP)
9/15/10
® Yes ❑ No
11/29/10
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. IMC Metals America
2. Greenheck Fan
3. Clearwater Paper
30. lUP Number
1003
1006
1004
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/21
9/8/19
11/1/19
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
468
433
430.120
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
36: a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. NYes [-]No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
11
Organic Management Plan (TOI
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. NYes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes []No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-CustodyForms?
® Yes ❑
No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SILT Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SILT submit all reports
❑YesNNo❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required b 1UP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period; Did the POTW Identify
NYes❑No❑NA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of S1U limit
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. Duringthe Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes ® No
❑
Yes
® No
❑
Yes
®
No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
NYes❑No❑N/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
1[
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penal Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penal Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updtited December 2016 Page 2

P23ILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
. The POTW must ensure that the contracted lab uses the 0.002 mg/L LTMP detection level for copper during all future analyses.
28. SUO adopted on 10/3/11.
39. The POTW's on -site lab only performs analyses on conventional parameters during LTMP sampling events. The POTW contracts
Shealy Environmental Services to perform all analyses (including conventional parameters) during SIU sampling events.
41a. IMC Metals America and Greenheck Fan both contract Shealy Environmental Services to perform analyses. Clearwater Paper
contracts Prism Laboratories to perform all analyses.
42a. POTW had used CWF to determine compliance with Greenheck Fan's IUP limits; however, CWF is no longer used (as of
May 2017) following clarification from the Division's PERCS Unit.
43a. IMC Metals America was issued a NOV for a copper daily maximum limit violation in April 2017. Greenheck Fan was issued a
NOV for a pH minimum violation in June 2017.
43b. IMC Metals America was issued a NOV for the failure to submit the March 2017 sampling data within the required time period.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
The approved ammonia LTMP detection level (0.1 mg/L) is used during the LTMP sampling events. The ammonia detection level of
0.5 mg/L is used during all remaining effluent sampling events per NPDES Permit. The POTW can either request a modification of the
LTMP to increase the ammonia detection level to 0.5 mg/L with written justification, or only use the ammonia results (using 0.1 mg/L
detection level) from the LTMP sampling events during the development of future HWAs.
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and well maintained. The City's Industrial Pretreatment Program
appeared to be properly implemented.
NOD: ❑ YES ®NO
NOV: [—]YES ®NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Ratine:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsati actory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:DATE: December 21, 2017
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 3

C I _-= .
ROY COOPER
:.; .
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
Water Resources A S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Environmental Quality Director
April 26, 2017
Ms. Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby/First Broad WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2016. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Compreh6nsive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2018.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704)
235-2192 and/or Deborah Gore at [phone] or at [e-mail] and
[e-mail].
Sincerely, 1
f-v2 W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality) Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

r, PAT MCCRORY
gGovemor
ON%r'R_ DER VAART
&Cretary
Water Resources S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Director
June 6,2016
Ms. Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Audit Inspection
City of Shelby/First Broad WWTP
NPDES Permit No, NCO024538
Cleveland. County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
a
Enclosed is a. copy of the Pretreatment Audit Inspection Report for the inspection of the City of
Shelby approved Industrial Pretreatment Program onMay 18, 2016 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.' Bell
at (704) 23 5.72192, or via email at w s.bellgncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
W. Corey. Basinger,.Regi6nal Supervisor.
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality [Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North, Carolina 28115
704 663,1699

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Background Information:
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Jordan Jackson
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Address of POTW:
--------- -----Street/Post-Office-Box—Post Office -Box 207
City/State/Zip Code Shelby, NC 28151
Phone Number: [phone] Fax Number: 704-484-6872 E-Mail: [e-mail]
5. Audit Date: 05/18/2016
6. Last Inspection Date: 06/24/2015 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes
❑ No
If Yes, Explain. The WWTP reported an effluent pH minimum violation on 9/21/15 and a weekly average effluent
fecal coliform violation on 11/14/15.
9.. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB)Coding:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type
Inspector
Fac. Type
LNJ INICI0I0I2I4IsI3Ig I I65I18I16I IC'rI
LSJ
LLI
(DTIA) (TYPI)
(INSP)
(FACC)
.10..._Current.Number of Significant Industrial Users..(SIUS)�..:.......:........................:.....:.:..................................................:......................:.......
5
. SIDS.........
_11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users..(CI[TS)?
............................................................_....-.....
3
CICTS
_........................
-12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in Last Calendar Year? -
..........................................................................._..._................................... ....::.. .........
0
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
.....�......................................................................... ............................................:....
0
14. Enter Higher Number of 12 or 13
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.0
NOIN
15. Number of SIUs with No lUP, or with an Expired I:UP
_......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
0
NOCM
............ -.............
16. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
1
-PS.NC
_Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
.... ......................................._...._.........................................................................__......................................................._....................
...
17. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either. of Last. 2 Semi -Annual Periods,
0 .
MSNC
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi Annual Periods
..............................................................................................._................................
1
SNPS
........
19. Number of SIUs.in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
0
Semi -Annual Periods
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring. Requirements, that were Not Inspected or Sampled
r _
0
SN1N
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form . Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 1

21. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW
Program Element:
NCO024538
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
3/30/15
® Yes ❑ No
6/9/15
® Yes ❑ No
6/1/20
Industrial Waste Survey (1WS)
3/20/14
® Yes ❑ No
6/17/14
® Yes ❑ No
3/30/19
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
9/7/11
Z Yes ❑ No
9/23/11
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/5/11
® Yes ❑ No
12/22/11
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
9/15/10
® Yes ❑ No
11/29/10
® Yes ❑ No
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
22. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas. Kingstown, Fallston . I
I.
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current Intedurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ®'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
24. If yes to #22, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
If yes, Explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 10/3/11
26. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
29. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
None
Resources
30. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfactory
ki
v
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
®S ❑M ❑U .
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
®S ❑M ❑U
Emergencies
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
®S ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
®s ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
®s ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
®S ❑M ❑U
Computer.Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
®S ❑M ❑U
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July, 25, 2007 Page 2

F3231. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No.. Excel and HACH WIMS.
. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
All SIUs must pay a monthly administration fee.
Public Perception/ Participation:
33. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
34. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
_ffyes� Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? By appointment with either the Director of Water
Resources or Pretreatment Coordinator; files .would be reviewed at the WWTP.
35. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public., If no. how would the request be addressed? The request would be reviewed by the Director of Water Resources
and Pretreatment Coordinator;. any confidential files would be secured in a locked file cabinet.
36. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? . ® Yes- ❑ No
37. Is•the'public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
38. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ® Yes.❑ No ❑ NA
Permittint< (Industrial Waste Survev-IWS):
39a...How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users? Pretreatment staff can review all new permits in the
Ciq's on-line permit tracking system.
39b. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?) Review information on IWS forms; water use records, categorical activities, SIC Code.
40. Does the POTW.receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, How many are there?
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable.' Landfill Leachate; p'ermitte&through a maintenance and
sampling plan.
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) Septage haulers have designated point and have to sign in at the WWTP.
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries?Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
44. Review POTW's copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What parameters are over allocated?
45. If yes to #44, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety?, ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter? 10%
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern) NPDES POCs, categorical parameters.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 3

49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Flow rates, categorical requirements.
Permit Compliance:
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ®.No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Compliance judgement per Comprehensive Guidance, violations
(limits, monitoring, reporting, permit conditions) are addressed per ERP.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data?- ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all S1Us evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed? All Sl[Us are required to have slug/spill control plans.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate? Emergency contacts are kept
current, condition of secondary containment structures, chemical.storage practices, availability of spill response equipment.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point.for an SILT should be located? Pretreatment system effluent prior to
combining with domestic wastewater.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. POTW has SOP for sampling procedures, S1U
sampling procedures reviewed/evaluated during inspections.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for Metals - Shealy Environmental Services
Conventional Parameters - Shealy Environmental Services
Organics - Shealy Environmental Services
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
POTW uses internal COC (pH, temperature, flow) and the contracted lab's COC.. SIUs use the contracted lab's COC.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA):
60a. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
60b. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
60c. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? - Z-YES ❑ NO .
60.d. All LTMP/STMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, verify yourself!
60e. If NO to any above,, list violations
60f. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA?
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply) ❑Increased average flow ❑NPDES limits, change
❑More LTMP. data available ❑Resolve over allocation ❑5 year expiration []Other, explain.
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA?
®Inhibition ❑ Pass Through []Sludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain. Completion of WWTP upgrades in April 2016.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 4

65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment? No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW:
66. User Name
T Greenheck Fan
2. IMC Metals America
3. Clearwater Paper
67. IUP Number
1006
MA07
1004
68. Does File Contain Current Permit? I
N Yes . ❑ No IF
N Yes. ❑ No 11
N Yes ❑ No
69. Permit Expiration Date
9/8/19 =F
6/30/16 11
11/1/19
70. Categorical Standard Applied .E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
1 433
468
430.120
71. DoesFileContain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
N Yes ❑ No
N Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
11
72. Does File Contain Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
N Yes ❑ No 11
N Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
73. a. Does File Contain Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. [DYes EIND7
a. ®Yes []No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. []Yes []No
b. ❑Yes []No
b. []Yes ❑No
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑YespNo®N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
75. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from Division?
a. ®Yes []No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NooN/A
bnyes❑No®N/A
76. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Complete its
N Yes ❑ No
N Yes El No
Yes ❑ No
Sampling as Required b IUP, includingFlow?
IFN
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
N Yes ❑ . No 11
N Yes ❑ No 11
N Yes ❑ No
78. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
0Yes❑Not3N/A
Sampling as Required by lUP, including Flow?
79. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports on
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑ 71
time?
80a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
file include rocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
80b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
s❑NoNN/A
i7l
production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
1
81. _ During_ Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
82: - During Most`Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
[1Yes0NoNN/A
Repo igNon-Compliance from SIU Sampling?
83. a. Was POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
azYes❑NonN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c. If applicable, did POTW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
becomingaware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of SIU?
c.pYes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SILT in SNC?
❑ Yes N No
11 ❑ Yes. N No
❑ Yes ® No
85. J During -Most Recent Semi -Annual Period -Was -Enforcement Taken as
pYes❑NoNN/A .
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Specified in POTW s ERP OVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
87. Does File Contain Proof Of Penalty,Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
88. a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
amYes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
,b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑NomN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
89. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any Requested
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Information For You?
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
72. SIU inspections were performed on 12/1/15 (Greenheck Fan), 11/18/15 (IMC Metals America), and 11/23/15 (Clearwater Paper).
76. POTW contracts Shealy Environmental Services to perform analyses.
78. Greenheck Fan and IMC Metals America contract Shealy Environmental Services for sample analyses. Clearwater Paper contracts
Prism Labs for sample analyses.
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 5

85. The POTW issued a NOV to IMC Metals America for TSS and copper permit limit violations that occurred in September 2015.
The POTW also issued NOVs to Clearwater Paper for TSS and instantaneous flow permit limit violations that occurred in July
2015, August 2015, September 2015, and November 2015.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
Inspection type
Inspector
Facility Type
ON N C 0 'Q 2 4 105 1 18 16
0
20
(DTIA)
(TYPI)
(INSP)
(FACC)
.1. Industry Inspected: Clearwater Paper
2. Industry.Address: 671 Washburn Switch Road, Shelby, NC 28150
3. Type of Industry/Product: Napkins/Paper Towels/Bath Tissue
4. Industry Contact: George Beckey Jr. Title: EH&S, Manager Phone: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ®. Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview
B. Plant Tour
C. Pretreatment Tour
D. Sampling Review,
E. Exit Interview
® Yes
❑ No ,
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
Fax: [phone]
Industrial Inspection Comments:
The Company produces approximately 11 million cases of product per year and currently employs 261 personnel. The facility has
contracted Veolia for the disposal of spent glue (non -hazardous waste) and STAT for any cleanup activities (spills, etc.).
The pretreatment system includes: equalization tank, vertical DAF. Unit, belt press, in -line pH monitoring system, and continuous flow
measurement system. The Dewatered sludge is removed/disposed by a contracted company.
The SIU is equipped with an in-depth computer monitoring system to assist the wastewater staff in the operation of the pretreatment
units/processes. 81U staff should reduce the level of foam passing underneath, the ultrasonic' flow meter to ensure accurate flow
measurements are being recorded.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and wellmaintained. The City's Industrial Pretreatment Program is being
properly implemented.
The City staff must ensure that the pH meter calibrations are documented for the SIT sampling events.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ®No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® final ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
Audit COMPLETED BY:DATE: June 6, 2016
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWR Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 6

PAT MCCRORY
Water Resources:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Ms. Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
1.:y
Governor
hib—ONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
April 26, 2016
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby/First Broad WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland. County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2015. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .U908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2017.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Wes Bell at
[phone] and/or Ms. Sarah Bass at [phone] or at [e-mail] and
[e-mail]. [e-mail]
m
W. Corey Basinger, Regional. Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
W:
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

F�LE
NCDENR
_ -North Carolina Department of Environment and -Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
June 29, 2015
Ms. Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Shelby
NP.DES Permit No. NCO02453 8
Cleveland County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the City of
Shelby approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on June 24, 2015 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at [phone], or at [e-mail].
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
MSC 1617-Central Files/Basement
W.
Sincerely, .
r� Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, DENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaierquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 30% Recycled110% Post Consumer paper

ATNORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
f:+naa..t.M am Xuixri.. tic.sawcv...
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Ms. Jordan Jackson
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 8/6/13 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? 0. YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MMMD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO024538 06/24/15 P S 1
(DTTA) (TYPT) (TNSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
F 6
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
4
CIUS
9. Number of SILTS Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SILTS Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
pSNC
14. Number -of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW. INTERVIEW
17. - Since the Last PCI, has -the POTW had any NPDES-Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC foi
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC foi
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
- ❑ YES N NO
❑ YES ® NO
Limits: NA
Reporting: NA
blished: NA
NA
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? Z YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES- ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files, complete with supporting documents and co of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Pro am Info:
Program Element Last Submittal Received Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file? Date In file If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
- 3/30/15
® Yes ❑ No
6/9/15
® Yes ❑- No
6/1/20
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
3/30/14
® Yes ❑ No
6/17/14
® Yes ❑ No
3/30/19
Sewer Use Ordinance SUO
9/7/11
® Yes ❑ No
9/23/11
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan RP)
115111
® Yes ❑ No
12/22/11
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
6/21/10
® Yes ❑ No
11/29/10
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IIJP) FILE REVIEW 3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Greenheck Fan Corp. 2. Kendrion 3. Clearwater Paper
Corp.
30. IUP Number
1006 FA04
1004
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
9/8/19 6/30/16
11/1/19
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433 433
430.12
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
11
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain aSlug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. []Yes []No
37. For 40 CFR 41.3 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. NYes ❑No
a. ®Yes []No
a. ®Yes []No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
11
® Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-CustodyForms?
® Yes ❑
No
® Yes ❑
No
®Yes ❑
No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SITJ Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
11
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SILT submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
11
❑Yes❑NoON/A
production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNNA
❑Yes❑NoON/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sam ling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A '
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. Duringthe Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑Yes
® No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penal Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No0N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penal Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
28. The SUO was adopted on 10/3/11.
39. POTW contracts Shealy Environmental Services for sample analyses.
41a. Greenheck Fan Corp. and Kendrion both contract Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. for analyses. Clearwater contracts Prism
Labs for analyses.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
Kendrion closed the plating line and permanently disconnected the pretreatment system in June 2015.
The records reviewed were organized and well maintained. The City's Pretreatment Program was being properly implemented.
Requirements:
POTW must ensure to measure the flow at Pipe 002 according to the ]UP for Clearwater.
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES ®NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
r lei./ . °l..-
PCI COMPLETED BY: �''l -v -DATE: June 29, 2015
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

k14JpL
�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources .
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 23, 2015
Ms. Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby/First Broad WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the reporting
period of January through December 2014. Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina
Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2016.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] and/or
Sarah Bass at [phone] or at -vves.bell a,ncdenr. og_v and [e-mail]_.
Sincerely,
Wes Bell
Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] l Customer Service:1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Fmial nnnnrh miiv 1 Mfiirmefive Ad'an Frnniover — 30% Rouded?10% Post consumer naoer

a�, �*
NCDENR FILE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
August 15, 2013
Ms. Jordan Jackson
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Shelby WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0024538
Cleveland County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the City of
Shelby approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on August 6, 2013 by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at [phone] or at wes.bell(a],ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
�7
V;LL;�:
_ Michael L. Parker
�Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www,ncwaterquality.org
One
NorthCarolina
Amiral`ly
An Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action Employer — 30% Recycledi10% Post Consumer paper

FCr; �
�*W NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
KGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI: Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
I. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Jordan Jackson
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 12/20/10 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI M Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous, Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? M YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES M NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO M NA
PCS CODING
Trans:Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO024538 08/6/13 P S 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
4
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUS With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUS in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUS in SNC) 11
2
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either ofthe Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
2
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC foi
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC foi
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES M NO
❑ YES M NO
Limits: See Comments
Reporting: N/A
dished: None
❑ YES M NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? M YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? M YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? M YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? M YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? M YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑' YES M NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Upiiated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
their files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS A roval Letter, and dates consistent with Pro am Info:
Program Element Last Submittal Received Last Approval Date Next Due,
�
DateIn file.
Date In file
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
4/15/10
®
Yes
❑ No
5/25/10
®
Yes
❑
No
6/1/15
Industrial Waste SurveyS)
3/13/09
®
Yes
El No
3/19/09
®
Yes
❑
No
3/30/14
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
9/7/11
®
Yes
❑ No
10/3/11
®
Yes
❑
No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP
10/5/11
®
Yes
❑ No
12/22/11
®
Yes
❑
No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
9/15/10
®
Yes
❑ No
11/29/10
®
Yes
❑
No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name IF
1. Dicey Fabrics 2. IMC Metals America
3. Clearwater Paper
30. IUP Number
DI01
MA07
CP12
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes El No
® Yes El No
® Yes
❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/16
6/30/16
6/30/14
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
468
430
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes El No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes El No
® Yes El No
❑
Yes ❑
No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑NoNN/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. MYes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes El
® Yes El
® Yes ElNo
its Sampling as Required b IUP, includingflow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-CustodyForms?
® Yes El No
® Yes
❑
No
® Yes El No
41 a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
NYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, includingflow?
11
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
IF!esE]NoMN/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNNA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes®No❑N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
45. Duringthe Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes ®
No
®Yes
El
No
®Yes El
No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑NoE]
NYes❑No❑N/A
NYes❑No❑/AN
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penal Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑MFIN/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
El ®No
❑ Yes ® No
ElYes ® No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form l ipdated 7/25/07 Page 2

rLE REVIEW COMMENTS:
19. Clearwater Paper — SNC for TSS (January — June 2013), IMC Metals America — SNC for oil & grease (July— December 2012 and
January — June 2013).
35. POTW Inspections: Dicey Fabrics—11/1/12, IMC Metals America—11/9/12, Clearwater— facility initiated discharge in December
2012 — no inspection to date.
39. Dicey Fabrics and IMC Metals America contract Shealy Environmental Services for sample collection and analyses. Clearwater
Paper contracts Prism Laboratories for sample collection and analyses.
41a. POTW contracts Shealy Environmental Services for sample collection and analyses at Dicey Fabrics and IMC-Metals America.
POTW collects samples at Clearwater Paper and contracts Shealy Environmental Services for analyses.
44. IMC Metals America did not notify POTW within 24 hrs. of first knowledge of limit violations.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
The records reviewed were organized and well maintained.
Requirements:
Pretreatment staff must ensure that SIUs adhere to the 24 hr. notification requirement for self -monitoring violations.
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: �� ,' ?=a— f_ �' i . �� DATE: August 15, 2013
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/2507 Page 3

7w" ,,
NCENR
LE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
July 30, 2013
Ms. Jordan Jackson
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 27699
Subject: PAR Review
Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County
Dear Ms. Jackson:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2012. Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for
North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2014.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Wes Bell at (704) 663-
1699 or by email at wes. bell a,ncdenr. gov.
Sinker' ly,
Donna Hood
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: hfp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
One
NorthCarolina
An Equal Opportunitv ` Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled(10% Post Consumer paper

As�
F`�
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Dee Freeman
Governor Director
Secretary
April 26, 2011
Mr. David Hux
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, NC 28151-0207
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Hux:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2010. Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for
North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
or by email [e-mail].
Sincerely,
ohn Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: hfp://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
One
NorthCarolina
NaturaQl
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled,110% Post Consumer paper

r
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
P"Al F--mILE
NCDENI�
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
Mr. David Hux
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject:
Dear Mr. Hux:
December 21, 2010
Pretreatment Audit Report
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the audit of the City of Shelby approved
Industrial Pretreatment Program conducted on December 20, 2010 by John Lesley of this Office. Please note
the required submittal dates for pretreatment program elements in the Pretreatment Program Elements Review
Section of the report.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
,,,,,
Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: hftp://pofal.ncdenr.or_/web/wg
NorthCarolina
NahI All
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

ARA-
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY of WA
NCDE . n PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Background Information:
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Annette McMurray
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Address of POTW:
Street/Post Office Box Post Office Box 207
City/State/Zip Code Shelby, NC 28151-0207
Phone Number 704-484-6857 Fax Number 707-484-6872 E-Mail annette.mcmurray(a)cityofshelby.com
5. Audit Date 12/20/10
6. Last Inspection Date: 05/11/10 Inspection Type: ®PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s) ? ®Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, Explain. Cyanide violation 3130110, related to lime slurry addition, has not recurred (NOV-2010-LV-0287).
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB)Codinc:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DDIYY
LLLI INIC10 IO I2 I4 Is 13 I8 I I12I20I10j
(DTIA)
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS)?
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial. Users (CIUS)?
12 Number of SIUs Not Inspected.by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
..............................................................................................................................................................
13. Number. of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
...........................................................................................................................
14. Enter Higher Number of 12 or 13
........................... ..
15. Number of SLUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP
16. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods ...
Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
17. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Saml
Inspec.Type Inspector
Type
Fac.''l
LSLJ
l
W
(TYPI) (INSP)
(FACC)
.........................
4
......... SIUs..........
.........................
2
....... CIUS.........
.........................
0
.................................
.........................
0
.................................
.........................
0
. NOIN.........
.........................
0
NOCM.......
0
PSNC
0 MSNC
0 SNPS
0
0 1 SNIN
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007
Page 1

21_ PRFTRF,ATMF.NT PROGRAM F,I.FMF.NTS RF,VIF,W
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Du
If Applicabl
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
4/15/10
® Yes ElNo
5/25/10
® YesEl. No
6/1/15
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
3/11/09
® Yes ❑ No
3/19/09
® Yes ❑ No
3/30/14
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/13/07
® Yes ❑ No
1/2/08
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
1011103
® Yes ❑ No
1011103
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
9/15/10
® Yes ❑ No
11/29/10
® Yes ❑ No
e,
e
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
22. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas. Falston, Kingstown
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ® Yes ElNo ❑ NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
24. If yes to #22, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
If yes, Explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council September/20/2004
26. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ElYes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
29. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
None
Resources
30. Please Rate the Followine: S=Satisfactory M=Mareinal U=Unsatisfactory
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
One full time and 2 part time staff
POTW's Pretreatment Program
®S ❑M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
®S ❑M ❑U
Emergencies
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
®S Elm ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
®S ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
®S Elm ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Consortum voluntary Pretreatment Grade 1 Certification
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
®S Elm❑U
regualtory update meetings in 2010. HWA Workshop in 2009.
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
®S Elm ❑U
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 2

1. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. Excel and HACH Water Information Management System (WIMS).
32. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
Each SIU must pay a $450 administration fee. ,
Public Perception/ Participation:
33. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
34. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed?
By appointment with Pretreatment Program Coordinator, cannot remove files from review area, staff available to make
copies.
35. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public. If no. how would the request be addressed?. File marked "Confidential" and maintained in a secure location .
36. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
37. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
38. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS):
39a... How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users? Utilities Dept. notifies Pretreatment Coordinator of
new industrial or commercial users, availability of Executive Information System data on-line providing water
and wastewater data on industrial and commercial users.
39b. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?)Regulatory requirements, site visits, IWS Forms, historical data, water use records, site specific sampling.
40. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
❑Yes ®No If Yes, How many are there?
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable.
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) Septage only, designated point, each driver has to fill out a manifest, and random samples are
collected.
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
44. Review POTW's copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What parameters are over allocated?
45. If yes to #43, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NA
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter %
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 3

48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants 11
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
IWS, categorical determination, NPDES parameters, sludge permit parameters.
49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Compliance history, now rates, NPDES compliance.
Permit Compliance:
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Calculates compliance judgement points to determine SNC status for
limits. Reporting SNC is based on ERP, reports 60 days past due is SNC.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed?
All SIUs must have a slug/spill plan.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
List of current contacts, comparison of chemicals present with those in IWS, containment structures, site visit information,
spill response procedures and clean up materials on hand.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Process wastewater segregated from the domestic line. Both process outfall and domestic outfalls are sampled.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. POTW staff have SOP, reviewed with SIU staff.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for Metals Shealy Labs
Conventional Parameters Shealy Labs
Organics Shealy Labs
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
The POTW uses the commercial chain of custody form.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA):
60a.
60b.
60c.
60d.
60e.
60f.
Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
All LTMP/STMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, verify yourself!
If NO to any above, list violations
Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone �) --
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 4

FDo62. you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If,
What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply) ❑Increased average flow
❑More LTMP data available ❑Resolve over allocation 05 year expiration
Explain.
❑NPDES limits change
[:]Other
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA? ❑Inhibition ❑ Pass Through ®Sludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ❑ Yes ® No
Explain.
Summarv:
65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
No significant changes are planned.
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW:
66. User Name
1. Curtis Wright
2. FAS Controls
3. Dicey Fabrics
67. IUP Number
CW08
FA04
DI01
68. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No 11
® Yes ❑
I ® Yes ❑ No
69. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/11
6/30/11
6/30/11
70. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
433
NA
71. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
72. Does File Contain Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
I ® Yes ❑
I ® Yes
❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
73. a. Does File Contain Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ON
a. NYes ONO
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes [:]No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
75. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from Division?
a. NYes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
a. NYes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
76. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Complete its
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ KI
® Yes ❑ No
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
I ® Yes ❑ Nol
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
78. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
79. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports on
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
time?
80a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NogN/A
file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
80b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
. production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
81. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
82. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
Re ortin Non-Com liance from SIU Sampling?
83. a. Was POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.sYes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW within 30 Days?
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N1A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c. If applicable, did POTW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
c. ❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
becomingaware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of SIU?
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SIU in SNC?
I
❑ Yes
® No 11
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Yes
®
No
85. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken as
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
Specified in POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
87. Does File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 5

88. a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
I
a.❑Yes❑No®N
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
89. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any Requested
❑Yes ® No
El ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Information For You?
11
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
71. IUP Application date: Curtis Wright, 3/13/06; FAS, 4/12/06; Dicey Fabrics 12/13/05
72. Inspection date: Curtis Wright, 12/20/10; FAS, 12/7/10; Dicey Fabrics, 12/8/10.
75. Permit review letter: all SIU permits were approved on 6/8/06.
78. All the SIUs and the POTW use Shealy Labs.
85. Curtis Wright was issued a NOV for a cadmium limit violation on 9/28/10. Silver was retested by Shealy and found to be compliant
(originally reported as noncompliant).
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspection type Inspector Facility Type
❑N N I C 10 10 12 14 15 13 18 12 120 110 1 0 :K ❑
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected: Curtis Wright Controls
2. Industry Address: 201 Old Boiling Springs Road, Shelby NC
3. Type of Industry/Product: Aircraft Parts
4. Industry Contact: Phillip Felkes Title: Facilities Manager Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No Most of the manufacturing involves machine shop and assembly work.
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No Metal platting process wastewater is conveyed to an evaporator.
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
The facility has provided an Engineers Certification for the Evaporator System that has been installed at the facility. The
pretreatment system consists of holding tanks, pH adjustment, flocculation, a final clarifier, and sludge processing (sludge
press). The filter press filtrate is pumped to the holding tanks for processing, the evaporator solids are mixed with the sludge
for processing and off site disposal by Heritage Environmental. Mop water (oily waste) is taken by FCC Environmental for off
site disposal. Air Quality are not required for the evaporator according to DAQ staff.
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 6

SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: There is continued improvement in the management of the POTW's Pretreatment Program. Files are well
organized and data is well man aged. All records were complete and up-to-date.
Requirements: See the Program Elements Review Section of this report for specific program due dates.
Recommendations: Curtis Wright has installed a complete stand-alone nondischarge evaporator system that has no physical
connection to the POTW. It is recommended that the POTW. If the POTW determines that the SIU could be dropped please
provide the supporting information (Engineer's Certification, Inspection Report, etc.) in making the request to the PERCS
Unit.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal Unsatisfactory ❑
Audit COMPLETED BY: cc `v DATE: December 21, 2010
J ri L sley, Mooresville Regi 4al ffice
NC DWQ Pretreatment Audit Form Revised: July 25, 2007 Page 7

NCDER
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
June 2, 2010
Mr. David Hux
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Toxicity Test Results
City of Shelby WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Hux:
Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject
facility on May 11 and 14, 2010 by John Lesley of this Office. Whole effluent samples were collected for
use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a
pass.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this
report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
obert B. Krebs
1 Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Susan Meadows, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 Fax [phone] East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115 Mooresville, North Carolina
No IgCarolina
Naturally
Internet: www.ncwatergualitv.ora Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Fnini nnnnrtiinity/Affirmafiva Actinn Emolover— 50%Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Page 2
Whole effluent samples were collected on May 11 and 14, 2010 by facility staff and John Lesley,
Division of Water Quality, for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Shelby WWTP
has an effluent discharge permitted at 6.0 MGD entering the First Broad River (7Q10 of 44.3 CFS). The
test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows:
Test Type
Test Concentration
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail
17% sample
PASS
100%
26.1 neonates
100%
25.3 neonates
7.11 SU
352 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/I
7.08 SU
414 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/I
Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water
quality impacts on the receiving stream.

Division of Water Quality
May 25, 2010
MEMORANDUM
To: Rob Krebs
Surface Water Protection, MRO
Through: Cindy A. Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
From: Carol Hollenkamp
Quality Assurance Officer Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Q Y � q
Subj ect: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Shelby WWTP
NPDES Permit # NCO024538/001
Cleveland County
The aquatic toxicity test using composite samples of effluent discharged from Shelby WWTP has been
completed. Shelby WWTP has an effluent discharge permitted that is 6.0 million gallons per day (MGD)
entering the First Broad River (7Q10 of 44.3 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on May 11 and
May 14 by John Lesley and D. Lane (facility representative) for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass -
fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows.
Test Type
Test Concentrations
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia chronic pass fail
17%
Pass
100%
26.1 neonates
100%
25.3 neonates
7.11 SU
352 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/L
7.08 SU
414 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/L
Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality
impacts on receiving water. The samples were split and sent to Pace Analytical. Pace Analytical conducted
a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass fail test and it also resulted in a pass at 17%. Please contact us if further
effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at [phone].
Basin: BRD04
cc: Central Files
John Lesley, MRO
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section

4
NCEN
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
May 12, 2010
Mr. David Hux
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Hux:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on May 11, 2010 by John Lesley of this Office. Please note the required submittal dates for
pretreatment program elements in the Pretreatment Program Elements Review Section of the report. The
Shelby Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
obert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
lntemet: hfto:Hportal.hcdenr.org/web/wq
One
NorthCarolina
Natlll'aAll
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— =0% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NC®ENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Annette McMurray
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 12/4/07 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
o�OF W ATF9PG
`? r
O Y
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES El NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO024538 05/11/10 P S 1
(I)TTA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
4
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules. or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES ® NO
[:]YES ® NO
Limits: None
Reporting: None
dished: NA
None
❑ YES ®NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ❑ YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

F
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
ir files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Pro ram Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
10/6/06
®
Yes
❑ No
10/31/06
®
Yes
❑ No
10/31/11
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
3/11/09
®
Yes
❑ No
3/19/09
®
Yes
❑ No
1 3/30/14
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/13/07
®
Yes
❑ No
1/2/08
®
Yes
❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
12/1/03
®
Yes
❑ No
12/1/03
®
Yes
❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
4/19/00
®
Yes
❑ No
7/21/00
®
Yes
❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name IF
1. Dicey Fabrics
2. Metals America
3. Curtis Wright
30. IUP Number
DI01
MA07
CW08
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/11
6/30/11
6/30/11
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
NA
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
I ® Yes ❑ Noll
®
Yes
❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ON
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ®Yes ❑No
I
a. ®Yes ON
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.NYes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
I
® Yes ❑ Nfol
®
Yes
❑ No
®
Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
NYes❑No❑N/A
11
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
NYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
OD time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
file includeprocess/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑No®NA
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
c.®Yes❑No❑N/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. Duringthe Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in'SNC?
❑Yes
®
No
TO
Yes
®No
El Yes
®No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
NYes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoNN/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
® No
Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
17!
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Permit Application: Dicey Fabrics, 12/13/05; Metals America, 12/28/05; Curtis Wright, 3/13/06
2. Inspection Date: Dicey Fabrics, 11/12/09, Metals America, 12/3/09; Curits Wright, 11/11/09
3. IUP Review Approval: Dicey Fabrics, 6/8/06; Metals America, 7/24/06; Curtis Wright, 6/8/06
4. (#39 and #41a) The POTW performs all the required sampling at Metals America.
5. (#39) The POTW contracts Sheally Labs to perform all sampling and IUP required analyses.
6.(#43, #44, #46) Curtis Wright had a single violation of the cadmium limit during the first six-month period of 2009. The SIU notified
the POTW by e-mail within 24 hours of first knowledge of the violation. The facility resampled within 30 days. The POTW sent Curtis
Wright a Notice of Violation for the noncompliance.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
1. The Shelby Industrial Pretreatment Program has been completely reorganized and implemented an electronic filing system in addition to
hard file reorganization. All files were readily available, complete and up-to-date.
2. The Sewer Use Ordinance was approved by the Division on 1/2/08 but has not been passed by City Council.
Requirements:
See the Pretreatment Program Elements Review section of this report for due dates.
Recommendations:
The City of Shelby Industrial Program is commendable.
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: DATE: May 12, 2010
John Lesley, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

A4
ALI
NGDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 31, 2010
Mr. David Hux
Assistant Utilities Director of Operations
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Hux:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2009. Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for
North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2011.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
or by email at john.lesley@ncdenr..gov .
Sincerely,
1
ohn Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: «nvw.ncwaterquality.org
NorthCarolina
,Natural4i'
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

A. X � �'Ar
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
June 5, 2009
Mr. David Hux
Assistant Utilities Director of Operations
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Hux:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2008. Based on the review, it appears that the POTW completed
the PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2010.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely
Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
Central Files
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.newaterquality.org
One
NortbCarolina
AWlllvlI iJ
An Egoal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer — 50° o Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

January 29, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: 7007 1490 0004 5537 8882
Mr. Brad R. Cornwell
Utilities Director
Town of Shelby
P.O. Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina. 28151
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Shelby WWTP
Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Cornwell:
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
T-11 31
F E 0 - G ?009
"%" it'
ti6r
This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self -monitoring report form for the month of November 2008
indicates a violation of the toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit.
You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity
violation(s). Your efforts may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE), a site -specific study
designed to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity, isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the
effectiveness of toxicity control options, and confirm reductions in effluent toxicity. Please be aware that North
Carolina General Statutes provide for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and
requirements.
The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent Toxicity Monitoring
and Reporting Requirements. Please note appropriate mailing addresses for submitting your Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic Toxicity (AT) Test Forms. We encourage you to review this information; if it would
be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent toxicity noncompliance, please contact
Mr. John Giorgino with this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
ci�sl
q4
Cindy Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
cc: R®b^4,tebs^Mooresville Regional Office
John Lesley- Mooresville Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
Environmental Sciences Section
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location OnrthCarolina
1621 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] Reedy Creek Rd �!Qtlf!'GIl`J�
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Raleigh, NC 27607
Internet: htta://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/esb/ Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY MONITORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION
The following items are provided in an effort to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity
testing and reporting information. Please take time to review this information. The items below do not address or include
all the toxicity testing and reporting requirements contained in your NPDES permit. If you should have any questions
about your toxicity testing requirement, please contact Mr. John Giorgino with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at (9I9) 743-
8401 or another Unit representative at the same number.
➢ The permittee is responsible for ensuring that toxicity testing is conducted according to the permit requirement and that
toxicity report forms are appropriately filed.
The reporting of whole effluent toxicity testing data is a dual requirement. All toxicity test results must be entered (with the
appropriate parameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
IN ADDITION
Toxicity test data (original "AT" form) must be submitted to the following address: .
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
➢ Toxicity test results shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the
reporting period (eg, January test result is due by the end of February).
Toxicity test condition language contained in your NPDES permit may require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing
upon failure of any single quarterly toxicity test. If the initial pass/fail test fails or if the chronic value is lower than the
permit limit, then at least two multiple concentration toxicity tests (one per month) will be conducted over the following two
months. As many analyses as can be completed will be accepted. If your NPDES permit does not require use of multiple
concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any single quarterly test, you may choose to conduct either single
concentration toxicity testing or multiple concentration toxicity testing per the Division's WET enforcement initiatives
effective July 1, 1999. Follow-up multiple concentration toxicity testing will influence the Division's enforcement response.
➢ Toxicity testing months are specified by the NPDES Permit, except for NPDES Permits which contain episodic toxicity
monitoring requirements (eg, if the testing months specified in your NPDES permit are March, June, September, and
December, then toxicity testing must be conducted during these months).
➢ If your NPDES Permit specifies episodic monitoring and your facility does not have a discharge from January 1-June 30,
then you must provide written notification to the Environmental Sciences Section by June 30 that a discharge did not occur
during the first six months of the calendar year.
➢ If you receive notification from your contract laboratory that a test was invalidated, you should immediately notify the
Environmental Sciences Section at [phone] and provide written documentation indicating why the test was
invalidated and the date when follow-up testing will occur.
➢ If your facility is required to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs, you should complete the
information block located at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county and
the month/year of the subject report. You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form, sign the form and submit following
normal procedures.
➢ The Aquatic Toxicity Test forms shall be signed by the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) except for facilities
which have not received a facility classification. In these cases, a duly authorized facility representative must sign the AT
form. The AT form must also be signed by the performing lab supervisor.
➢ To determine if your AT test forms were received on time by the Division of Water Quality, you consider submitting
your toxicity test results certified mail, return receipt requested to the Environmental Sciences Section.

o�0� W A
r
A --i
Mr. David Hux
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Dear Mr. Hux:
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
January 26, 2009
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO02453 8
Cleveland County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on January 22, 2009 by John Lesley of this Office. Please note
the required submittal dates for pretreatment program elements in the Pretreatment Program
Elements Review section of the report.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
( .' Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Cleveland County Health Department
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 Fax [phone] East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115 Mooresville, North Carolina
None Carolina
�tura!!y
Internet: www.ncwatergualitv.org Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Fnual OnoortunitvlAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

A7A_ - NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NC®ENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Annette McMurray
3. Title(s): Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 12/4/07 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
WAT F9QG
o -mac
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES [:1NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ®NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number IvIM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
N NCO024538 01/22/09 P S 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
4
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
2
CIUS
9. Number of SIUS Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0.
10. Number of SIUS Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUS With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
1
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
SNPS
46. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
L
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC foi
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC foi
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
® YES ElNO
Toxicity Failure 11/08
NH3 4/08
EYES ❑ NO
Toxicity Failure (source not
determined)
Limits: FAS Controls 11/08 silver
Reporting: NA
)lished: NA
None
❑ YES ® NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO (See Comments)
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

F
ETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
les, com lete with su ortin documents and co of PERCS A roval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
10/6/06
® Yes ❑ No
10/31/06
®
Yes ❑ No
10/31/11
Industrial Waste Survey IWS
3/11/04
® Yes ❑ No
7/6/04
®
Yes ❑ No
3/30/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/13/07
® Yes ❑ No
1/2/08
®
Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
1011103
® Yes ❑ No
10/1/03
®
Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
4/19/00
® Yes ❑ No
7/21/00
®
Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL IISER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR I FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Dicey Fabrics IF
2. Metals America
3. Curtis Wright
30. IUP Number
DI01
MA07
CW08
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
®
Yes ❑ No
® Yes
❑
No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/11
6/30/11
6/30/11
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
NA
NA
433.15
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
o
® Yes ❑ No]
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
I ® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No 11
®
Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes ONO I
a. ®Yes EIN07
No
a. ®7es
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
❑Yes❑NoEN/AIr
es❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. NYes [:]No
11
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑ No
I IF
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
®
Ye
I ®
Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A,_
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
file include rocess/dilution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
production rates and/or flows as Required b IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑No®NA
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/°
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
violations from the POTW sample event?
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes ® No
❑
Yes ® No
❑
Yes ® No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWO Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Question 34: Permit Application Dates, Dicey Fabrics 12/13/05; Metals America 12/28/05; Curtis Wright 3/16/06
Question 35: Inspection Dates, Dicey Fabrics 9/16/08; Metals America 1/29/08; Curtis Wright 12/16/08
Question 36: The Slug and Spill Control Plans are over five years old. New Slug and Spill Control Plans should be requested from the
SIUs.
Question 43: Metals America is not required to sample, the POTW does all sampling.
Question 46: Curtis Wright was sent a Notice of Violation for a cadmium limit violation.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
FAS Controls was in SNC during the six-month period 1/08-6/08 for silver limit noncompliance (one TRC violation found in three
sampling events).
The ERP was submitted and approved by E-mail correspondence.
SUO revisions have been made as required by the Division's letter dated 1/2/08. The SUO is currently awaiting approval by the City
Council.
Requirements:
LTMP detection limits should be lowered to ensure that at least 50% of the sample test results are above the test detection limit.
The IWS must be submitted to the PERCS Unit in the Central Office by no later than 3/30/2009.
A Toxicity test failure was reported in November 2008. No source of the toxicity was determined. All subsequent tests passed.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the files be reorganized by SIU name, with all pertinent information (IUP, IUP Application, sampling data,
correspondence, etc.) maintained in a binder (or separate file).
NOD: [:]YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Ratine:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisf o ry_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: �� DATE: January 23, 2009
esley, Mooresville Regio7ily ffice
Jol�/
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

t1.LA.—
North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Alria
NC®ENR
Department of Environment and
January 12, 2009
Mr. David Hux
Assistant Utilities Director -Operations
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Subject: Toxicity Test Results
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Hux:
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman, Secretary
Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility
on December 12, 2008 by John Lesley of this Office. Whole effluent samples were collected for use in a
chronic pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
t✓
L Robert B. Krebs`
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Susan Meadows, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Cleveland County Health Department
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] , Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer - 50 ` o Recycled \ 10 %, Pest consumer Paper

NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Page 2
Whole effluent samples were collected on December 9 and 12, 2008 by John Lesley for use in a chronic
Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Shelby WWTP has an effluent discharge permitted at 6.00 MGD
entering First Broad River (7Q10 of 44.3 CFS). The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test
information follows:
Test Type
Test Concentration
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail
17% sample
PASS
100%
29.4 neonates
100%
30.25 neonates
6.77 SU
376 micromhos/cm
<0.0052 mg/l
1.08 SU
313 micromhos/cm
<0.0052 mg/1
Test results for these samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality
impacts on the receiving stream.

Division of Water Quality
December 19, 2008
MEMORANDUM
To: Rob Krebs
Regional Supervisor, Surface Water Protection, MRO
Through: Cindy A. MooreC
Supervisor, Aquatics Toxicology Unit
From: Carol Hollenkamp c '(
Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Shelby WWTP
NPDES Permit # NCO024538/001
Cleveland County
J A N - 8 2009
M-Surface eater Protection
The aquatic toxicity test using 24-hour composite samples of effluent discharged from Shelby WWTP has
been completed. Shelby WWTP has an effluent discharge permitted that is 6.00 million gallons per day
(MGD) entering First Broad River (7Q10 of 44.3 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on
December 9 and December 12 by John Lesley for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity
test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows.
Test Type
Test Concentrations
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail
17% sample
Pass
100%
29.4 neonates
100%
30.25 neonates
6.77 SU
376 micromhos/cm
<0.0052 mg/L
7.08 SU
313 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/L (pocket colorimeter)
Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have water quality
impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be
reached at [phone].
Basin: BRD 04
cc: Central Files
John Lesley, MRO
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section

n �^ _
L,..s....s.> ...: R ,.�.*`.- .o-.._.i_ a^l 1i �r�w ....w �Sw`'-:..iyc''-

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 5, 2007
Mr. Steve Tolbert
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Audit Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on December 4; 2007 by John Lesley of this Office. Please note that Long Term
Monitoring Plan effluent data must be reported on the appropriate monthly monitoring reports. It is
required that the August 2007 monthly monitoring effluent data be amended to include any Long
Term Monitoring Plan data that was omitted from the monthly monitoring report.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please. do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley at [phone]. -
Sincerely,
obert B. Krebs
�egional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
Cleveland County Health Department
N. C_ Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

ARPIAr NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENK PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
I. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Steve Tolbert
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 1/30/07 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type
10
NCO024538
12/04/07 P
MTTAI (TYPT)
Inspector Fac. Type
S 1
(TNSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SILTS)?
5
SIDS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ?
4---J
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
0
Semi -Annual Periods Total Number of SIUs in SNC
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
SNPS
16. Number of SATs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
1
Semi-annual Periods
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC fm
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for SNC fm
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
® YES ❑ NO
Toxicity test failure May 2007
EYES ®NO
None
Limits: Copeland Corporation
Reporting: Copeland Corporation
blished: None
None
El YES ®NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ❑ YES ® NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations: Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Selinium, Silver, Mercury, and Molybdenum
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LIMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

FI
RETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW — Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy ofProgram Element in
files, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Readworks Analysis A
10/6/06
® Yes ❑ No
10/31/06
❑ Yes ❑ No
10/31/11
Industrial Waste Survey S
3/15/04
® Yes ❑ No
11/07/04
® Yes ❑ No
3130/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
8/31/07
® Yes ❑ No
11/07/04
® Yes ❑ No
Revision in
progress
Enforcement Response Plan RP
10/1/03
® Yes ❑ No
10/1/03
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
4119/00
® Yes ❑ No
1 7/21/00
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT aUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name IF
1. Copeland Corporation 2. CurtisWright
3. Dicey Fabrics
30. IUP Number
C004
CW08
DI01
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/11
6/30/11
6/30/11
33. Categorical Standard Applied .E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A
433
433
NA
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
a. ®Yes [:]No
a. ®Yes DNo
a. ®Yes []No
b. If No, is One Needed? See Inspection Form from POTW)
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
MYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ®Yes [IN o
a. ®Yes ONO
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
b.MYes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
®Yes ❑ No J1
®Yes ElNo
® Yes El No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A
MYes❑No❑N/A
MYes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
MYes❑No❑N/A
MYes❑No❑N/A
MYes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
MYes❑No❑N/A
E Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
roducfion rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑ Yes ❑ No
ElYes ❑ No
[-IYes ElNo
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
I ® NA
® NA
® NA
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
a ❑Yes❑NoMN/A
a.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
c.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
c.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
violations from the POTW le event?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® No
I
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
48. Does the File Contain Penal Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penal Collection?
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
Fb.c
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
b.❑Yes❑NoMN/A
Yes❑NoNN/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
❑ Yes ®No
❑Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Question 16: Copeland Corporation was in SNC during the last six-month period of 2006 for oil and grease and late reporting.
Question 25: Long Term Monitoring Plan effluent analytical results for arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, silver,
mercury, and molybdenum were not included on the August 2007 monthly monitoring report.
Question 34: Application dates: Copeland,10/19/05; Curtis Wright, 3/13/06; Dicey Fabrics,12/13/05
Question 35: Inspection dates: Copeland,11/15/07; Curtis Wright,11/13/06 (scheduled for 12/07); Dicey Fabrics,11/19/07.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
1. Copeland Corporation is to cease discharge in 2008.
Requirements:
1. Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2B .0506 (b)(3)(n states: "The results of all tests on the characteristics of the effluent,
including but not limited to NPDES Permit Monitoring Requirements, shall be reported on the monthly monitoring report forms". It is
required that the August 2007 Monthly Monitoring Report be amended to include any missing effluent data from the LTMP analytical
results.
2. See the Program Elements Review Section of this report.
Recommendations:
1. The Pretreatment Program Coordinator is to retire in December 2007. It is recommended that the replacement staff person be
appointed and trained as soon as possible.
NOD: ❑ YES ®NO
NOV: [:]YES ®NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:::: ._ ---\ DATE: December 5, 2007
, Mooresville Regfon,#1 Office
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

�OF W A TF9p Michael F. Easley, Governor
�0 G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 20, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7002 3150 0003 7052 3576
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
nosr'1.4fP k;9tJ7Y�46E�F�bLEV, '
,-,°e 27SOURCE�
Mr. Brad R. Cornwell
Utilities Director
0OORESVi LF- f , .= ,= OFFICE
Town of Shelby
`hli
P.O. Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina
28151
JUL 2 v 2007
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Shelby WWTP
Cleveland County
p�
EATER
Dear Mr. Cornwell:
This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self -monitoring report form for the month of May 2007
indicates a violation of the toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit.
You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity
violation(s). Your efforts may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction. Evaluation (TRE), a site -specific study designed
to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity, isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity
control options, and confirm reductions in effluent toxicity. Please be aware that North Carolina General Statutes provide
for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and requirements.
The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent Toxicity
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Please note appropriate mailing addresses for submitting your Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic Toxicity (AT) Test Forms. We encourage you to review this information; if it
would be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent toxicity noncompliance, please contact
Mr. John Giorgino with this office at [phone].
cerely,
Cindy A. Moore
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
cc: =gib I'"r-FlxR�Mooresville Regional Office
John Lesley- Mooresville Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
North Carolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.esb.enr.state.nc.us 4401 Reedy Creek Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY MONITORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION
➢ The following items are provided in an effort to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity testing and
reporting information. Please take time to review this information. The items below do not address or include all the toxicity testing
and reporting requirements contained in your NPDES permit. If you should have any questions about your toxicity testing
requirement, please contact Mr. Kevin Bowden with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] or another Unit representative at the
same number.
➢ The permittee is responsible for ensuring that toxicity testing is conducted according.to the permit requirement and that toxicity report
forms are appropriately filed.
➢ The reporting of whole effluent toxicity testing data is a dual requirement. All toxicity test results must be entered (with the appropriate
parameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
IN ADDITION
Toxicity test data (original ."AT" form) must be submitted to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
➢ Toxicity test results shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting
period (eg, January test result is due by the end of February).
➢ Toxicity test condition language contained in your NPDES permit may require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure
of any single quarterly toxicity test. If the initial pass/fail test fails or if the chronic value is lower than the permit limit, then at least two
multiple concentration toxicity tests (one per month) will be conducted over the following two months. As many analyses as can be
completed will be accepted. If your NPDES permit does not require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of.any
single quarterly test, you may choose to conduct either single concentration toxicity testing or multiple concentration toxicity testing per
the Division's WET enforcement initiatives effective July 1, 1999. Follow-up multiple concentration toxicity testing will influence the
Division's enforcement response.
➢ Toxicity testing months are specified by the NPDES Permit, except for NPDES Permits which contain episodic toxicity monitoring
requirements (eg, if the testing months specified in your NPDES permit are March, June, September, and December, then toxicity testing
must be conducted during these months).
➢ If your NPDES Permit specifies episodic monitoring and your facility does not have a discharge from January 1-June 30, then you must
provide written notification to the Environmental Sciences Section by June 30 that a discharge did not occur during the first six months
of the calendar year.
➢ If you receive notification from your contract laboratory that a test was invalidated, you should immediately notify the Environmental
Sciences Section at [phone] and provide written documentation indicating why the test was invalidated and the date when
follow-up testing will occur.
➢ If your facility is required to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs, you should complete the information
block located at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county and the month/year of the
subject report. You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form, sign the form and submit following normal. procedures.
➢ The Aquatic Toxicity Test forms shall be signed by the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) except for facilities which have
not received a facility classification. In these cases, a duly authorized facility representative must sign the AT form. The AT form must
also be signed by the performing lab supervisor.
➢ To determine if your AT test forms were received on time by the Division of Water Quality, you may consider submitting your toxicity
test results certified mail, return receipt requested to the Environmental Sciences Section.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 2, 2007
Mr. Steve Tolbert
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2006. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and
guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The
next PAR will be due March 1, 2008.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Lesley
Mooresville Regional Office Contact
Cc: Monti Hassan, PERCS Unit
Central Files
N"pne
E- hCarolina
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary ((JJ
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek,,P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 31, 2007
Mr. Steve Tolbert
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Audit Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on January 30, 2007 by John Lesley of this Office. Please note the required
submittal dates for pretreatment program elements in the Pretreatment Program Elements Review
section of the report. The City of Shelby Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitatd to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�—J-66 Lesley
Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Daryl Merritt, PERCS Unit
Cleveland County Health Department
JL
Nose hCarolina
Natutally
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

�—� NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
�'®E� PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT s
Background Information [Complete prior to audit; review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shebly
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Steve Tolbert and Donna Lane
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coo rdinator/Laboratory Supervisor and Lab Technician
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing PO Box 207
City Shelby, North Carolina Zip Code 28151
Phone Number 704-484-6850 Fax Number 704-484-6872 E-Mail steve.tolbert(a)cityofshelby.com
5. Audit Date 01/30/2007
6. Last Inspection Date: 09/01/2005 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ❑ Yes ® No
If Yes, Explain.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Achieve Compliance Date: SOC expiration date:
Parameters Covered Under Order °
PCS (WENDB)Codin
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type
�NIC10 10 12 14 15 13 18 1 101 130107 J
(DTIA) (TYPI)
1.0:... Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS).............................................................................................................................
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUS)?
......................................................................................................................................................................
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
...............................................................................................................................................
13. Number of SIUS Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
...............................................................................................................................................
14. Enter the Higher Number of 12 or 13
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Number of SIUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP
.................................................................
17. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
.................................................................................................................
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
............................................................
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods
............................. .............................................................. ................................................................................................................ -............................................. .............................. ...............
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled
Inspector
Fac. Type
(INSP)
(FACC)
6
SIUS
4
CIUS
.......................
0
.........................
0
.........................
0
NOIN
1
PSNC
0
.........................
0 MSNC
I
0
0 1 SNIN
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
pnv 1

F
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has submitted Program
me at with supporting documents and PERCS Approval Letter, and dates are consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
09/05/06
® Yes ❑ No
10/31/06
® Yes ❑ No
10/31/11
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
03/15/04
® Yes ❑ No
03/30/04
® Yes ❑ No
03/30/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
11/04/04
® Yes ❑ No
11/07/04
® Yes ❑ No
06/1/07
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/01/03
® Yes ❑ No
10/01/03
❑ Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
04/19/00
❑ Yes ❑ No
11/07/04
❑ Yes ❑ No
Legal Authoritv (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO
22. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas.
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
24. If yes to #22, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
If yes, Explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 11/07/2004
26. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
29. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
None
Resources
30. Please Rate the Followine: S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfactory
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
The Pretreatment staff is made up of the Pretreatment
POTW's Pretreatment Program
❑S ®M ❑U
Coordinator who is also the lab Supervisor and FOG Program
Manager.
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
®S ❑M ❑U
Emergencies
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
®S ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
®S ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
®S ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
®S ❑M ❑U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
®S ❑M ❑U
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
paoa 7

31. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No "Iq
Explain Yes or No. Computer programs are available, currently uses handwritten forms for LTMP data.
32. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
Service Fee for SIUs, and surcharge program.
Public Perception/ Participation
33. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. Copeland will be closing in the near future.
34. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? By appointment
35. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public. If no, how would the request be addressed?. Confidential material is placed in a separate sealed file.
36. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
37. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
38. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ® Yes ❑ No
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS)
39a... How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users? Customer Services contacts the Pretreatment
Coordinator regarding new users. The Pretreatment Coordinator may require the new user to fill out a survey
form prior to service being connected.
39b. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?) Comprehensive Guide definitions of SIU and potential to impact the WWTP.
40. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, How many are there? Landfill Leachate
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable. Local Permit
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) Septage, sludge from Boiling Springs WWTP.
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
44. Review copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What parameters are over allocated?
45. If yes to #44, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NA
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter %
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
NPDES Pollutants of concern, application listing of potential pollutants, categorical parameters.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Pave q

rHow does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Uniform frequency
Permit Compliance
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Limits: follows guidelines for TRC and Chronic noncompliance in
the Comprehensive Guide. Reporting: Late reports get a NOV, nonreporting is SNC with a fine. Permit Condition: A
NOV is issued, if not corrected then the SIU is placed in SNC.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug and spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug control plan is needed?
All SIUs must have a spill and slug control plan.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to review a submitted slug control plan?
SIU contact information must be current, all storage areas must be defined, chemicals listed, and containment with no floor
drains in chemical storage areas.
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Process water only segregated from the other waste streams.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, explain. Sampling procedures are reviewed with contract lab staff - all sampling is done by contract laborties.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for the following parameters:
Metals Shealy Labs
Conventional Parameters Shealy Labs
Organics Shealy Labs
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
All samples must be accompanied by the contract lab's chain of custody form.
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LIMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
60. Is LTMP maintained in a table? ® Yes ❑ No
Review Data and Explain. Data is complete and up-to-date contained in monthly folders, a hand written summary table is
used.
Verified that LTMP effluent data is reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report? ® Yes ❑ No
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone () --
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply)
❑Increased average flow
❑More LTMP data available
Explain.
❑NPDES limits change
❑Resolve over allocation
63. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA?
®Inhibition ❑ Pass Through
❑ Other
❑5 year expiration
❑Sludge Quality
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? N Yes U No '14
Explain. WWTP is underloaded.
Summary
65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS)
66. User Name
1. Honeywell
2. Curtis Wright
3. Dicey,Fabrics
67. IUP Number
FA04
CW08
DI01
68. Does File Contain Current Permit? ® Yes
❑
-N-o-I
® Yes ❑ :N:oA
® Yes ❑ No
69. Permit Expiration Date 6/30/11 11
6/30/11
6/30/11
70. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A 433 11
433
NA
71. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
® Yes ❑ No
11
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
72. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No 11
®
Yes [:],No
® Yes
❑ No
73. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Ins ection Form from POTW)
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. []Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
75. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑NosN/A
a. EYes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑NosN/A
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑NosN/A
76. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®yes ❑ No
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
78. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
EYes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
79. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
EYes❑No❑N/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
11 EYes❑No❑N/A
80. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non-Com liance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
81. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resam le Within 30 Days?
a.❑Yes❑NosN/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. EYes -[:]No
a.❑Yes❑NosN/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
82. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
83. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®
No
❑
Yes ® No
84. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYes❑No❑N/A
11
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
85. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑YesZNoON/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
86. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
87. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NosN/A
b.❑Yes❑NosN/A
a.❑Yes❑NosN/A
b.❑Yes❑NosN/A
a.❑Yes ❑NosN/A
b.❑Yes❑NosN/A
88. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
LZtJ I N I C 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 5 1 3 1 8 1 1 01 1 30 1 071 11I L-s J L2J
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected: Honeywell
2: Industry Address: 1100 Airport Road, Shelby NC 28150
3. Type of Industry/Product: Parts for auto industry - switches.
4. Industry Contact: Tommy Causby Title: Platting Supervisor Phone: [phone] Fax:
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Paa S

VD
oes the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? X Yes ❑ No
id the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
The SIU, Honeywell Controls, is a metal platter that utilizes a physical/chemical treatment system. Process wastewater is
conveyed to a 25,000 gallon holding tank and subsequently to a series of tanks for pH adjustment (Sulfuric Acid addition and
Caustic addition), flocculation with ferric chloride and sodium bisulfite additon, two clarifiers, two additonal holding tanks,
sand filters (out of service for repair/maintenance) and is discharged to the City of Shelby collection system. Samples are
collected of the treated process water. Sludge is conveyed from the clarifiers to a sludge holding tank. Plate Press dewatering
(filtrate is returned to the clarifier) is used along with sludge driers to condtion the sludge prior to shipment off site to RIECO
in Arkansas as a hazardous waste.
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: Copeland, Inc. is in SNC for oil and grease in the July -December 2006 period
Requirements: See the Pretreatment Prosram Elements Review Section of this report for program element submittal dates
Recommendations: It is recommended that a database such as Excel be used for LTMP data documentation or if handwritten
records are perferred it is recommended that the table in Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Guide be used to summarize data
NOD: ❑ Yes
® No
NOV. ❑ Yes
® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes
® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
Audit COMPLETED BY — -= rT 7 �;� ~'-N DATE: January 31, 2007
Jam:. i Lesley, Mooresville Rees'[ Office
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

PPP
o�OF W ATF9pG
C
t7 �
September 2, 2005
Mr. John Rhom, WWTP.Superintendent
City of Shelby
Post Office Box .207
-Shelby, North Carolina28151-0207
Subject:
Dear Mr. Rhom:
l
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment, and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek:, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Pretreatment -Compliance Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Enclosed is .a copy of .the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at -the subject facility on September 1, 2005 by John Lesley of this Office. The City's
Industrial.Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
.this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.
Surface Water Protection Regional.Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
-Deborah Gore, Pretreatment Group
Cleveland County Health Department
JL
✓ wArra!!y
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 (704) 6631699 Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NC®ER PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
D—
E-- --RCeOWCC9
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI: Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)l
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Steve Tolbert Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
4. Last Inspection Date: 10 /21 /2004 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number. Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector
I N I I N I C 1 0 I6 I7 14 I15 13 IR I Inglm 10,-;1 121 1-IR I
Fac. Type
LLJ
(FACC)
(LUTIA) ('1'YPl(INS
7. _Current Number,Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? 5
P)
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ?
4
CIUS
9. 'Number of SIUs Not Inspected B POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled B POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
-12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
-Semi-Annual Periods Total Number of SIUs in SNC IL
0
PSNC
14. Number of SILTS in SNC For Reporting DuringEither of the. Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations DuringEither of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16..Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods _E
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW-had any POTW Permit Limits Violations? ❑ Yes ® No
If Yes, What;are the Parameters -and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. `Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any'Problems Related to an Industrial El Yes ® No
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge. Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 .Semi- SNC for Limits: None
.Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last SNC for Reporting: None
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice? Not Published: NA
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? None
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which ❑ Yes ® No
Ones?
m Filenae: Shelby PCI 0506 Page I
Revised: 6/30/98

n,rr.wrm0 T17V[7rVVV_ Dle .,.Dr)TW f11Pc and rnrnnlPtP the fnllnuvinv'
r;RETREATh
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
3/18/02
.10/31/06
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
7/6/04
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
11/7/03
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/1/03
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
2/1/02
LIMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted.at.Appropriate Locations.and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Elirninated:from or Added to.the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: .Added:
:24. Are Correct Detection Levels 'being used for all LTMP Monitoring? �Z Yes _❑ No
'25. Is the LTMP.Data Maintainedin a Table or Equivalent? ..® Yes :❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ®Yes ❑ No
r.,,,....1...rr.r�. rarr,,c •n�c�rc\1��� rrTD T7rr F DT;xrMWQ /IR 1 •FTT rF RRVTRW ANT) 1 TCT iNSPECTIONi
.--Jl\L.V Ll11uPUJ'V 6iL'1�.1 avay.ua
26. User Name
---_ -
L Copeland Corporation 2.7Curtis 1�4'right
3. Dicey Fabrics
.'27. IUP Number
-0004
CW.08
DI01
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes No
®Yes No
Yes No
29. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/06
6130/06
6/30/06
30. Categorical Standard Applied I.E. 40 CFR, Etc. Or N/A
433
433
NA
31. Does File ContainPermit Application Completed Within One-YearPrior'
® Yes .❑ No
0Yes No
Yes ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
-
22. Does File Contain.an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
.0 Yes ❑ No
® Yes, No
® Yes ❑ No
33. a. Does the File Contain.a Slug Control Plan?
. ®Yes ONO
L-b.'[:]Yes
a. ®Yes ❑No
a. _®Yes []Nob.
If No, is One .Needed? See ection.Form from POTW
• ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
lb. ❑Yes ❑No
34. .For 40 CFR 413 and433 TTO Certifiers, Does File -Contain .a Toxic
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
•Or anic Management Plan TOMP ?
35. a. DoesFile-Contain Original.PermitReview Letter from the Division?
a.:®Yes';❑No
[b.oYesONoON/A
a.:®Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes'❑No
b. All Issues Resolved?
'b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
36. During -the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period,.Did-the POTW Complete
® Yes .0 .No
Yes ❑ No
L
® Yes El No
-its Sampling -as Required by IUP?
37. - Does File -Contain POTW:S lin Chain-Of-Custod Forms?
® Yes ;El No
®Yes ❑ NOD
®Yes [:1No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
®Yes❑No❑N/A .
-.®Yes❑No❑N/A :
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP?
39. .Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
40. Dur`ing.the Most Recent'Semi-Annual Period, Did-theePOTW Identify
❑ Yes
70Yes .:❑ No
❑ Yes io No
All Non -Co liance-fromBoth`POTW=and'SIU Sampling?
NA
®NA
®:NA
41..a. Was the POTWNotified.by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑YeMMON/A
Monitoring Violations?
rIa.[_3,YesE3No0N/A
b. Did Indus Res 1e Within'30 Da s?
.Yes []No
b.'❑Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes'❑No
42. Was the SILT Promptly Notified of Any violations (Per ERP)?
-❑Yes❑NOON/A
j .❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® 'No
❑ Yes ® No
11 ❑ Yes ® No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
OYes❑No®N/A
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑NO®N/A
47. .a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any. of This
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Requested.Information For You?
Filename: Shelby PCI 0506 Page 2
Revised: 6/30/98

INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING: NOT APPLICABLE
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
�NIrIn (I I I I I I I I I
(DTIA)
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
.3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact: Title:
Phone: Fax:
Inspec.Type Inspector FaqT��.yp
u u u
(TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW-Contact Conduct the Following,Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ;❑ Yes ;❑ No
:13. 'Plant Tour '❑Yes :;❑ No
C. Pretreatment'Tour `-o Yes '..❑ No
D.:Sampling - eview ❑Yes ❑ No E. ExifInterview,, °❑ Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
FILE REVIEW °COMMENTS:
All files were complete and up to date. No discrepancies were":found.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments: All SIU permits expire on June 30, 2006.
Requirements: See the Pretreatment Program Elements Review Section of this report.
Recommendations: The City's:Pretreatment Program is well managed. Keep -up the good work.
NOD: '❑ Yes .® No
NOV.: ❑ Yes -;® No
QNCR: �❑ Yes Z :No
POTW Rating•
:Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
YCLCOMPLETED BY: —DATE: September 2.,:2005
Lesley, Mooresville egional-Office
Filename: Shelby PCI 0506
evised: 6/30/98
Page 3

(],t-'
�QF W AT SRO Michael F. Easley, Govem4
\Q (� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
f� North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
QAlan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 18, 2006
Mr. Steve Tolbert
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North_Carolina 28152_ ___
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2005. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Cc: PERCS Unit — Jon Risgaard
Central Files
JL
MWA
NCDENR
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
NorthCawlina
Naturally
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwatergualitv.org 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

Kb::!mei F. EmIey. Geve-qr
y r
>_ Wier. G. Rca-s. Jr..Serle�mry
0 Maul Carolina Decart-mrd of Ewi onrn,-M and NaW al Resoca-, s
Alan W. tkra}, P.E-, Director
Division of Water Quaty
April 17. 200=
Mr. Steve Tolbert
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina
Subject: PAR Review
City- of Shelby
IN Peit No. NC0024538
Cleveland County. NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has re'Vzew ed YGur Pretreatment -\nnual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2002- Based on the review. it appears thai
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines -set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Pros=s.
If you have any questions concerning your P_XR- please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely.
�� D. Rex G1e..son- P-E_
W ati r Qua1i ResHonal Supervisor
Cc: Deborah Gore, Pretreatment Unit - Central Offie
Central Files
JL
Moorsviiie Regional Office, 919 Norte Mali- S"_t, tjooresvitt. NC � �':5
PHONE [phone]
==X 04) 663-6040
Ci mw Sen�ce

O�OF `fv'ArFRQG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G_ Ross Jr., Secretary
y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
CO
> -{ Alan W. Klimek, PE., Director
p Division of Water Quality
�
January 21, 2003
Mr. Coleman Keeter
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Keeter:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
of the City of Shelby's approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on January 16, 2003 by Mr.
John Lesley of this Office. The City's Pretreatment Program staff is to be commended for a job
well done.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
CIN J
!. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
enclosure"
cc: Central Files
Deborah Gore, Pretreatment Group
Cleveland County Health Department
JL
N. C. Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28115 Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
" .
CDE[

Fill
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
r+oimO Onoaa�. vwrw:,er., -
L+w�c+.on — IL__ ihsamcen
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby-
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Steve Tolbert Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
4. Last Inspection Date: 08 /01 /01 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)?_ ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING _
Trans.Code MaimProgram Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspee.Type Inspector
I N I INlCIn 10 12 I 4 IS 13 IR 1 I011161031 LPJ IS I
�11
Fac. Type
L� J
(FACC)
(ll11A) (TYPI)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
(INS
6
P)
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users CIUs ?
4
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected B POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SNs Not Sampled B POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of Ss With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SNs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SNs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SNs In SNC For Limits Violations DuringEither of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SNs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17.
19.
Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes What are the Parameters .and How are these Problems -Being Addre
(See CommentsectionJ _
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
LJ Yes Z No
:--_>❑T�es=-��-moo _ - ° . _ -.
Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi- SNC for Limits: None
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last SNC for Reporting: None
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice? Not Published: NA
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SNs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SNs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? NA
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which ❑ Yes ® No
Ones?
m Filenae: Shelby pci 0203 Page 1
Revised: 6/30/98

Kity
EVIEW COMMENTS:
e's Pretreatment Program staff is doing a commendable job. The files were well organized and up-to-date.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments: The Citv of Shelby received ISO 14001 certification in June 2002.
Requirements:
Recommendations: .It is recommended that.a computerized Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) data management system be used for
maintenance of LTMP data.
NOD: -❑ Yes -.® .No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating•
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: DATE: January 21, 2003
Jo sley, Mooresville Regk 6alMee
Filename: Shelby pci 0203 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

n
F W ATF
0 R Michael F. Easley
Governor
co Department
G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O < Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2002
Mr. Steve Tolbert
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2001. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Prog ams. .
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
`' r✓ Rex Gleason, P.E.
I
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Tom Poe, Pretreatment Unit - Central Office
Central Files
AWA
C Et+�t
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

Michael F. Easley, Governors
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 7, 2005
Mr. Steve Tolbert
Pretreatment Program Coordinator
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28152
Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2004. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth in Chapter 9 of the
Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
C
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Cc: PERCS Unit — Deborah Gore
Central Files
JL
One
No tliCaolina
Natwully
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

w a
Michael F. Easley, Avem&
William G. Ross Jr., ecretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 22, 2004
Mr. John Rhom, WWTP Superintendent
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject:
Dear Mr. Rhom:
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on October 21, 2004 by John Lesley of this Office. The City's Industrial Pretreatment
Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Enclosure
cc
JL
No 1iCarolina
,Vaiura!!J
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Central Files
Deborah Gore, Pretreatment Group
Cleveland County Health Department
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

�V®A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NC®ENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)]
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Steve Tolbert Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Laboratory Supervisor/Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
4. Last Inspection Date: 09 /23 /2003 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector
I N I INIC1010_121415131S 10121 1041
Fac.'Tylpe
lW
(FACC)
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)? 6
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
4
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? Fecal Coliform
Not related to pretreatment. wkly max 6/27-7/3/2004
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial El Yes ® No
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi- SNC for Limits: None
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last SNC for Reporting: None
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice? Not Published: NA
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? [None
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which El Yes ® No
Ones?
Filename: Shelby PCI 0405 Page I
Revised: 6/30/98

RETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
3/18/02
10/31/06
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
7/6/04
3/30/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
11/7/04
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
10/1/03
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
7/21/00
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 TTTP FTT.F. RF.VTFWS (-)R 1 FTT.F. RFVTFW ANn 1 1T1 TNTCPFc�TTnN)
26. User Name
1. Copeland Corporation
2. Curtis Wright Inc. IF
3. Kemet Electronics
27. IUP Number
C004 =1
CW08
UCO2
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ Nol
® Yes ❑
No
® Yes ❑ No
29. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/06
6/30/06
6/30/06
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
433.15
NA
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
®Yes
❑
No
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. MYes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ONO
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoON
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. MYes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. MYes ❑No 1Fbb
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
. MYes ❑No
.®Yes❑No❑N/A
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
®
Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑
No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SILT Sampling?
® Yes ❑ No
El NA
❑ Yes El
® NA
El Yes ❑ No
® NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resam le Within 30 Days?
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. MYes ❑No
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Yes
® No
❑
Yes ® No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
Yes❑No®N/A
F
❑Yes❑No®N/A
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
I ❑Yes❑NoMN/A
❑Yes❑NoMN/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoON/A 11
❑Yes❑No®N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
.❑Yes❑No®N/A
Fb.0Yes0No9N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑Yes ® No
Filename: Shelby PCI 0405 Page 2
Revised: 6/30/98

1'1LL' l�, ♦A •♦ 1 "IIXIIX 1\A0. 11
Files were well organized and all data was complete and up-to-date. The City's pretreatment program is commendable.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments: The LTMP data is currently being transferred to a new electronic database.
Requirements: Please see the required submittal dates for the MVA and IWS in the Pretreatment ProZram Elements Review Section
of this report.
Recommendations: Consider dropping the allocated flow for Kemet Electronics to 20,000 2pd. The facility is permitted at 100,000
gpd but has historically not used more that 20,000 gpd.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:I �;>- DATE: October 22, 2004
1
J n L sley, Mooresville R 'ional Office
Filename: Shelby PCI 0405 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

OF W ATF9 Michael F. Easlrmsp'
or
0 QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
—{ Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
O 'C Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
September 24, 2003
Mr. Coleman Keeter
City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0207
Subject: Pretreatment Audit Inspection
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Keeter:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on September 23, 2003 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office. The report contains the
following requirements:
1. Review and upgrade the City's Sewer Use Ordinance if necessary to be consistent -with current
Federal and State regulations.
2. Send copies of the Enforcement Response Plan to the Significant Industrial Users within 30 days.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
I Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Deborah Gore, Pretreatment Group
Cleveland County Health Department
JL
� A
NMEtvR
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]

�F��
�� is NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENR PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Background Information jComplete prior to audit; review Program Info Database Sheet(s))
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: City of Shelby
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Steve Tolbert
3. Title(s): Laboratory Supervisor/Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing PO Box 207
City Shelby, North Carolina Zip Code 28151
Phone Number 704-484-6850 Fax Number 704-484-6872 E-Mail steve.tolbertzcitvofshelbv.com
5. Audit Date 09/23/03
6. Last Inspection Date: 01/16/03 Inspection Type: ®PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed. All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s) ? ®Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, Explain.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB)Coding
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
LsIJ I N I C I 0 I 0 12 1 4 15 13 1 8 I 109 1 23 103 I
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
Inspector
Fac. Type
(TYPI)
(INSP)
(FACC)
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users SIUS ?
.._-.................................................. _............. .a ................... -................................... ............ �..............�.............................. _...... _......... -........ _.-..._....... ......... ....... ........... ............
6
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUS)? 4
.......-................................................ .........................................................................................................-....._-..................................................
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected. by POTW, in the Last Calendar Year? 0
.............................................................................................-_.................................................
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0
.................-............................ -................................................................. -..... -.................................
14. Enter the Higher Number of 12 or 13 0
...............................................................................................................................................................-. -.
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 0
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................._...........................................................
1.6:...Number of SIUs with. No IUP or with an Expired]UP ........................................................................................................................:....... 0
.... e
17. Number of SlUs in SNC for Reporting During. Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods 0
...................................................................................................................
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods 0
.-....................................................................._.........................._.......................................................�..................................-.......-.......-..-.......-...........-......-..........................................
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 0
Semi -Annual Periods
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self-Monitorijig Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled 0
NOIN
..............
PSNC
MSNC
Mfl�l
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
D....o t

ATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headwork— Analysis (HWA)
2/18/02
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
9/8/99
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
4/29/94
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
4/13/94
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
2/22/02
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
21. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas.
22. If yes to #21, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
23. If yes to #21, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
If yes, Explain.
24. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 01/01/95
25. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
26. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ❑ Yes ® No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
27. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc? ❑
Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
28. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
None
Resources
29. Please Rate the Followine: S=Satisfactory M=Martrinal U=Unsatisfactory
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
®S ❑M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
®S ❑M ❑U
Emergencies
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
®S ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
®S ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
®S ❑M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
®S ❑M ❑U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
®S ❑M ❑U
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

30. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. Computer with necessary software to adequately manage the program.
31. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
Fees for services (5350 monthly service fee) and.sewer surcharges
Public Perception/ Participation
32. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
33. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? By appointment
.34. Does the POTW have a procedure in place that addresses requests by an industry for certain information to remain confidential?
® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. Sealed folder in a separate file
35. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
36. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
37. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ® Yes ❑ No
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS)
38. How does the POTW determine which industries have the reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and
therefore require a permit? (Who is an SIU?) Comprehensive Guide and 15A NCAC 2H .0900 regulations
39. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, How many are there? Landfill leachate from one source
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable. local permit
40. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ® Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ❑ NA
41. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) designated point and sampling program
42. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
43. Review copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What parameters are over allocated? NA
44. If yes to #43, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term AIPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NA
45. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ❑ Yes ® No (The WWTP is currently very
underloaded.)
If yes, what percentage of each parameter %
46. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
47. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
NPDES pollutants of concern, catergorical parameters
48. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Uniform frequency
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
Dn..n 2

49. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication? NA
50. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Uses Compliance Judgement Worksheets, Comprehensive Guide
51. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
52. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug and spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
53. What criteria are used to determine if a slug control plan is needed?
All SIUs are required to provide a slug/spill control plan.
54. What criteria does the POTW use to review a submitted slug control plan?
Documentation of chemicals in use, site description of chemical storage areas, and on -site inspections
55. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Process wastewater segregated from other sources of wastewater
56. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: swirling the sample bucket uniformly) ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, Explain. Standard Procedures Guidance, review of sampling procedures with contract lab staff (all samples are
collected by a contract lab).
57. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for
Metals Shealv Labs
Conventional Parameters Shealv Labs
Organics Shealy Labs
58. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
All samples are required to follow C of C procedures *of POTW and Shealy Labs.
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
59. Is LTMP maintained in a table? ® Yes ❑ No
Review Data and Explain. Handwritten tables compiled in folders for each month.
60. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? Z Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone (_) --
61. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply)
❑Increased average flow
❑More LTMP data available
Explain.
❑NPDES limits change
❑Resolve over allocation
62. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA?
❑Inhibition ® Pass Through ❑Sludge Quality
❑Other
❑5 year expiration
63. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain. The facility is operating at much less than capacity.
Summary
64. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
No
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
D--- A

INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT QUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS)
65. User Name
1. Curtiss Wright
2. KEMET
3. Dicey Fabrics
66. IUP Number
CW08
UCO2
DI01
67. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ Noj
®Yes ❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
68. Permit Expiration Date
6/30/06
6/30/06
6/30/06
69. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
70. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
433
NA
NA
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes El No
IF
71. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
11 ® Yes ❑ No
72. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan? .
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
. ®Yes ❑No
Fb.❑Yes [:]No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
73. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
74. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes ❑No
baYes❑No❑N/A
75. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
®Yes ❑ No
76. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ TqD
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
77. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A 1�®Yes❑No❑
N/A7es[]No[]N/A
78. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
79. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ No
F77
®Yes ❑ No
80. a. Was the POTW Notified by SILT (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations? k
b. Did Industry Resam le Within 30 Days?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. ❑Yes [:]No
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
81. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
82. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes ®
No
❑ Yes
®
No
❑
Yes ® No
83. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
Yes❑No®N/A
P
84. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
85. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
I ❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
86. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SILT in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
87. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ®No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
The SIU Permit Applications were completed in August 2000, which made the application slightly more than one year prior to
permit issuance. The information was confirmed on the application by the City as current prior to issuing the permit.
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments: The POTW is doing a commendable lob of managing the Pretreatment Program
Requirements: Update the SUO to be in agreement with current regulatory chances and submit the ERP to the signifcant
industrial users. Be advised that anv updates of the SUO be submitted to the Division's Central Office so that the file mavbe
made current.
Recommendations: LTMP data would be more understandable/accessible using a computerized spread sheet rather than
handwritten records.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

STRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
PPT,pa.,.C,dc Main Program Permit Number
� T �NIC 10 10 12 14 15 13 I8
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
09 123 103
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected: Curtiss Wright
2. Industry Address: 201 Old Boiling Springs Road .
3. Type of Industry/Product: Aviation parts
4. Industry Contact: Phillip Felkel Title: Environmental Engineer Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour Z Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
There were no flow meter calibration records. The POTW informed the SIU that failure to maintain proper documentation of
flow meter calibration is a violation of the SIU's permit.
Action
.NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ®_ No
POTW Rating•
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
Audit COMPLETED BY: �- / DATE: September 24. 2003
41Uesley, Mooresville a -onal Office
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
14C DEPT. OF EEE4firROMPI!F,;F
ANO NATURAL RESCM .
VWRESV?ik
r.
F.
MAR 0 8 2001
IN RE: Case No.: YfAM Ir. $%' A r+
Shelby Dyeing & Finishing, Inc.
������
SSN/EIN: 57-0525373 Chapter: 11
Debtor(s).
ORDER CLOSING REOPENED CASE
The Court having reviewed the record in this matter and it appearing that the
above -named Chapter 11 case, having been reopened on May 5, 1998, is now ready to
be closed.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
aboved-named case be CLOSED.
Dated: February 28, 2001
Marvin R. Wooten
United States Bankruptcy Judge
MAR 6 2001;' ti
Electronically filed and signed (02128/01)
081488
sag - 292

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources /\
Division of Water Quality J
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 21, 2000
MR. STEVE TOLBERT
CITY OF SBELBY
811 PLEASANT DRIVE
SHELBY NC 28152
N I
1 •MMA
IT
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND UF�i RM0_P1f2C�S
tiab� ME; pT°HIL��
0 &vla7f'i PAL 2i C;URLE9
JUL .4 2000
' 8I0f4 OF 01PO FTIAL 4RAGMeT
Subject: Pretreatment Unit Review of Shelby's Long Term Monitoring an t QI Ir AI o�Fl�t
Program: City of Shelby, Cleveland County
NPDES Number NCO024538
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
The Pretreatment Unit of the Division of Water Quality has reviewed the Long Term Monitoring
Plan submitted by the City of Shelby and received by the Division on April 19, 2000 with additional
information received on July 5 and 21, 2000.
The review indicates that the LTMP is adequate and meets the requirements needed to establish
a site -specific Headworks analysis (HWA). Proper implementation of an LTMP is also required by
Part III (B), of your NPDES permit. Please refer to the Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina
Pretreatment Programs (Comprehensive Guide) for additional information and examples.
1. LTMP Data Summary: Comprehensive Guide, Appendix 4-B Sample collection and
laboratory analysis must be done as outlined in this LTMP. It is also very important to
organize and summarize your data. An example LTMP data summary form can be found
in the Comprehensive Guide.
2. Division Review of Data: As your LTMP data is accumulated, organized, and analyzed,
the Division may request to review tabulated data and to see chain of custody forms and
laboratory data sheets.
3. LTMP Modifications: Changes or upgrades to the WWTP may indicate a need to change
the LTMP. Contact the Pretreatment Unit should you have any questions related to this
matter.
Thank you for your continued cooperation with the Pretreatment Program. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact Steve Amigone ext. 592 ([e-mail]) or Tom S. Poe,
Supervisor of the Pretreatment Unit exi. 522 ([e-mail]).
Sincerely,
�eveAmigon
shelby.LTMP
cc: Central Files
Steve Amigone, Pretreatment Unit
;John Lesley,.MRO- -�
NC—DENR, DWQ, PRETREATMENT UNIT Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Website: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/PretreaVindex.htnd 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NoR-rH CAROLINA DEPARTMEKT-r OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF DATER QUALITY
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
JAMES:B.'HLINT JR.
GOVERNOR April 12, 2000
Mr. Steve Tolbert
-.BILL HOLMAN - Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator
SECRETARY City of Shelby
Post Office Box 207
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
aKERR'T. ST.EVENS -
-:DIRECTOR. Subject: PAR Review
City of Shelby
NPDES Permit No. NCO024538
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Tolbert:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report
(PAR) for the reporting period of January 1 through December 31, 1999. Based on the
review, it appears that the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set
forth in Chapter 9 of the Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment
Programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact
John Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
m AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50 io RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER