Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310797_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201105Facility Number 0 - W'Division of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency type of Visit: i�(,:�o/mpliance Inspection U Operation Review U Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance &y 1 Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: i t`i Arrival Time: 7J7, Departure Time: b �r County: Farm Name: l �lt,_tn ' ' - �jr (fi(j- Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: �(�( �(/ 3 mL- ' � Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Wean to I Wean to I Feederto Farrow to Farrow to Farrow to Boars Other Phone: Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: i Region:1 Certification Number: 6r„ 22 Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. La er -I INon-Layer Design Current Dry Poultry Canacitv Pun. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Pouets Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes % No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facilit Number: ( - Date of inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes {.� No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes '' No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes I �y No EX ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? T Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): '✓t (/w �� 4 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E� No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes (j No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reauired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? �j—j( Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check rr❑�Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes © No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes V�L No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ZI No the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA P NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [D No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). SIL,� y, ��� 4L�x k'�) ,&N -9 L-) n V Q C Ov n 42 n vQ�,Q utiz- %rk cl.(M GA �ovnS OU� �� Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: 10/ d` Date: I M06 511212020