20201062 Ver 1_More Information Received_20201105

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
r Yes r No
ID#* Version* 1
20201062
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Stephanie Goss: eads\szgoss
Select Reviewing Office:* Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * r
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r
New Project
r
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
r
More Information Response
r
Other Agency Comments
r
Pre -Application Submittal
r
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
r
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
r Yes r No
Project Contact Information
Name: Martin Richmond
Who is subrritting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20201062 1
20170001(no dashes) 1
Project Name: Umstead S/D
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Johnston
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Additional Information Packet 110520_Final.pdf 5.89MB
Only pdf or Im7 files are accepted.
Describe the attachments
or comments:
Additional Info being supplied:
Approved JD Exhibit for Isolated Wetland
USACE Datasheet w/Photosheet
Revised Impact Map
Sign and Submit

W By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
■ I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
■ I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
■ I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
■ I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
■ I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
■ I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in autocratically.

Cox Woods/Umstead Subdivision
Clayton, Johnston County NC
AID# SAW-2015-01990 DWR #20-1062
November 5, 2020
PCN Additional Information

Info Being Supplied:
 Approved JD Exhibit depicting Isolated Wetland C as shown on the Wetlands Location Survey for
Cox Living Trust, Feb 3, 2016, and the Review Boundary for Approved Jurisdictional
Determination (AJD). This exhibit does not change jurisdictional status of wetland areas not
included within the Approved JD Review Boundary. Wetland areas excluded from the Approved
JD Review Boundary have been determined to be jurisdictional 9/30/2015 and confirmed
6/11/20 (AID# SAW-2015-01990).

 USACE Datasheet 10/27/20, taken within an ephemeral ditch located approximately where the
‘Tie Line’ is depicted on the Wetlands Location Survey for Cox Living Trust, Feb 3, 2016. This
data collection point location was determined in the field using a Garmin GPS Unit with a
digitized .kmz map of the Wetlands Location Survey. The point is located downgradient from the
Isolated Wetland C and upgradient from the jurisdictional Wetland A, and is shown on the
attached Exhibit A. Photos of the data collection point within the ephemeral ditch are included
in the attached Photo Sheet.

 Revised Impact Map with revised acreages for impacts. The acreage for the Isolated Wetland C
(Wetland Impact #1) has been removed from the Impact Table and relabeled as ‘Isolated’. In
addition, the acreage for Wetland Impact #2 has been revised from 0.105 acres to 0.0105 acres
(one decimal place), resulting in a change of 0.0945 acres. This change is the result of
typographic error shown on the previously submitted impact map and is not a change in the
impact area.
This revision results in the following impacts:
Wetland Impacts (Permanent)
Impact Area Area (Acres)
#1 Isolated
#2 0.0150
#3 0.1060
Total 0.1165
Bold Italics = Revised 10/29/20
Temporary stream impacts total 16 lf (no change).

Amelia Church Road
Clayton, Johnston County, NC
Cox Woods/Umstead SubdivisionExhibit
A Isolated Wetland C, as shown on Wetlands Location Survey
for Cox Living Trust, Feb 3, 2016.
Approved JD Exhibit 10/28/20
MRR
Project Boundary
Approved JD Review Area
LEGEND
Project Boundary
Approved JD Review Area
LEGEND
Review Boundary
Isolated Wetland C
Wetland A
Wetland C
Project/Site: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
x
Are Vegetation x , Soil , or Hydrology Yes x
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
x No
No X X
X No
x
x
Yes x
Yes x
Yes x X
Soils within the assesment area were saturated approximately 3" below land surface.
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
3
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Surface Water Present?
Field Observations:
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:

Is the Sampled AreaYes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
City/County:Umstead Subdivision Johnston County
T01
10/27/20
Jay S. Johnson, JSJ Builders, Inc. Fayetteville, NC NC
No
Section, Township, Range: Clayton, NCM. Richmond
<2 %LinearDitch
Datum: NAD83-78.49663135.641538LRR P, MLRA 136
Upland DitchNWI classification:Bb: Bibb sandy loam, frequently flooded
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
This data collection point is located within an upland ditch near Stream 1. This ditch is located within a sewer maintenance corridor and woody
vegetation has been removed.
HYDROLOGY
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R
OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
(Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
NoYes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. (A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 2 =
1. x 3 =
2. x 4 =
3. x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes x
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
T01
1
2
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
240
0
100
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
50.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
None
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
None
2 ft x 40 ft LF )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
Yes20Eupatorium capillifolium
Carex, spp 80
2 ft x 40 ft LF
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
2 ft x 40 ft LF )
None
100
2050
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
0
20
(A)
(B)
(A)
0
0
80
Multiply by:
160
2.40Prevalence Index = B/A =
80
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was present at this data collection point based on the Prevalence Index.
)2 ft x 40 ft LF
=Total Cover
FACW
FACU
Yes
=Total Cover
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches): X
Dark Surface (S7) unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
%
Loamy clay, dry
Texture
Sandy loam, saturated
T01SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist) Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/2
10YR 4/3
3- 16
0-3
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Photo Log – Oct 2020
Umstead Subdivision, Clayton, Johnston County NC
Page 1
Photo 1: Ephemeral ditch towards Stream 1. E/T01

Photo 2: Ephemeral ditch towards Isolated Wetland C. W/T01

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT
ZONE 1
ZONE 2
760 SF.
409 SF.
I STREAM BED IMPACT (TEMPORARY)
TOTAL STREAM BED IMPACT (TEMPORARY) 16 L.F.
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #
AREA (SQ.FT. / ACRE)
1
ISOLATED
2
459 SF / 0.0105 AC.
3
4,619 SF / 0.1060 AC.
TOTAL
5,078 SF / 0.1165 AC.
I /
i' ��------E-------- I---- i .320
c�—-."..........
✓ \ 1 1 ZONE 2 IMPACT /`• • • • ,�. • • • • �/
O O\ / O / l'.'1........ ...'. \'.'{ .. f 1 \ \ \ \ \ / / 7
O \ \ WETLAND IMPACT #1 o I
I 1 I / / %..'.'.'.'.'.'. I .'.'.'.. '.'.' .....A/ I I \ - r6 1 / / / / / I ' � \.
/ / I / /� ✓ \ \ \ 35 - - O I / I _ L20'PUBLIC\ - - _ - - f �- --> ... \ (ISOLATED IMPACT r, I / / / / \ �\ \\ \ '
_ ZONE 2 IMPACT / / �
\Y \ \ \ _1 (_l I_.....'`'M 6�//
----------
\�\\\\\\\ \ \\\ \ No 4-1 T ijTILIli TYI EASEMENT ---
/ I I ail.......' •/-- 1 \ \ t2
\� \ I / / \ \ 3�S ._. •/ / / / �ry. A11111
Os. O ZONE 1 IMPACT
I \\ \ \ \ \ , I I / I I I `I \ \ _ _ 36 I / t 1 0.'./f
I 1\ � 1 1 \ 1 I / 1 \ - t I I I I \ .� / /'.).'.' .'• / 1.. '.' .. Y / / o � \ _ - - 1 / \ /
�2
\ ( I I I I / \ I as / / ,.. ..'!'.•.'.•. f';/`.'.'.', ' I l / / / / / / / , s I \ � - � o r l l
O / I
/ \ \ I I / /... / / 1 1 1 M I / /Ln
Y \ � I I /\ / \ - �i / .) ✓] I , 1 I 1 I I I 1 / / ' \ \\ \ '"
o
11`
I \ \ ( \ y I t
1 ' I l � \ \ \ I 1 ( \ X � \ � .� / �/ •,� / � :.:,f` ,/.' ,l'.'!"• � I I I I � I 1 1 I I I \ � \ \ \ 1 17
\ \ \\ 1 I\1 \ \� �� \ \ 0 1 �\ / ✓ j,... ,f 1 i..' �/ Sb' R �ARIAS1JR� I I I \ \
�- \^� 1 > / � 1 1 / 38 315� � i�.•.••_.:�j•:•'•: / / OTF�. 50ME'ASUR D I
ROM TOP I ON BANK
�'� =-_ _ � / ( \\ f I \ 11\ 1\I\ \\\�,\\ - � 11 ( 1 \ \\ � / ,--'',.•--��.'..,...'.' • �'.i�:�;'., ''¢'.•. '.'.j�.'.'.'.'\ \ \ � \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ �.., _ �`' •� — �`" \ 1 / / / I ) 34 4 � j / ��` \ \ / �'
IMPACT #2 \ \\
-\�'' ;�—'J � / / / / �/ /// / , //// / / / / \ \ \ \ \t1•.\��\�__/ _. ...-�T .;...•...:.:..`..:.[_.`: 5..T.' ✓•.....�...�.. .
33
LIll\ ?,PUBLIC
�,
�.,..... y..... %.:.:.:. /....// �.� (. / ` `•'�'\ \ \ \\\\ �. .� /-. , / i ,ill
49
�. .
......Y ..
...,....1... '/- 3z / II I l / / / / uZ y
,��'.....'............ :».:., ..... ...'.j.'.'.'.' 1.... O
'.'.'...... �... :... �........).....'
-G L-1 j I 11 I I l \\ it l igF�v
/ /i/ \\\..... ..'..'.•.• .•, ....' .....'r. .'.'l� 1 / I l mil' \ � / ---- _ � / / 1 \ \� � /
:F ' • • ' ' ' 'I:":'.':':'.'.':''
/..... WE
IMPACT 3 / \I\1 �� / / \- /// // ✓✓\` %� / / �/
\
t-
Jl \ \ \ it \ (.✓',/ / / I / I I
/\
SCALE: 1 " = 60'
■
30 60 1 0
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF
THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY OWNER NOT LESS
THAN TWO (2) BUT NO MORE THAN TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION
North Carolina One -Call
Center, Inc.
www.neocc.org
1-800-632-4949
BUFFER, STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT MAP
FOR
UMSTEAD SUBDIVISION
TOWN OF CLAYTON - JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC