NC0025453_Permit Issuance_20000807

NPDE!i DOCUMENT SCANNINL COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0025453
Clayton WWTP
Permit Issuance
Document Typ
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Application
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
August 7, 2000
This dooumeat is priated oa reu6e paper -ignore M='Y
coazteat oa the resreree bide

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. R. Steven Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Clayton
P.O. Box 879
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Dear Mr. Biggs:
1 �•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
August 7, 2000
Subject: Final Permit
Clayton/ Little Creek WRF
NPDES Permit NCO025453
Johnston County
In accordance with the Town of Clayton's application for renewal of its municipal discharge
permit, the Division of Water Quality is forwarding herewith the Town's NPDES permit renewal. This
permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
dated May 9, 1994.
The Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility discharges in the Neuse River Basin (NRB). All
streams in the NRB have been designated as nutrient sensitive waters (NSW) as a result of algal bloom
problems in the estuary. The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission recently "
adopted rules establishing the Neuse River Basin Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy for
the reduction of phosphorus and nitrogen inputs. The point source rule (15A NCAC 2B.0234) is
intended to reduce total nitrogen UN) discharges by 30% by 2003. All facilities with permitted flow
greater than or equal to 0.5 MGD are receiving a TN limit in this permit cycle. This final permit
contains the previous total phosphorus limit, as well as a total nitrogen limit to comply with the point
source rule for the Neuse River Basin.
Based on further review of the existing data and Mr. James Warren's comments regarding the
Town's potential lead limit, the Division has agreed to phase the lead limit into the permit. The permit
requires the Town to conduct lead monitoring 2/month for the first year, then comply with the acute
limit of 33.8 pg/l as a daily maximum value. The Town may request that the lead data be reviewed
again prior to implementation of the limit, should lead values be consistently (at least one year)
reported below 33.8 ug/ 1.
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 - TELEPHONE [phone]/FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
VISIT US ON THE WEB AT http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

Mr. Steven Biggs
Town of Clayton
Page 2 of 2
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, Mail Service Center 6714, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such
a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division of
Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of
the permit.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required
by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or
any other federal or local governmental permit.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Susan Wilson at telephone
number [phone], ext. 510.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens
Enclosures: NPDES Permit No. NCO025453
cc: Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality
Point Source Compliance/ Enforcement Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Training and Technical Assistance Unit
Central Files
NPDES Files t

Permit No. NCO025453
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Water Quality Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Town of Clayton
Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility
On Durham Street Extension
Clayton
Johnston County
to receiving waters designated as the Neuse River in the Neuse River Basin
in accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective September 1, 2000.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on March 31, 2003.
Signed this day August 7, 2000.
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Clavton WXXITP
NPDES No. NCO025453

SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Town of Clayton
Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility
is hereby authorized to:
Permit No. NCO025453
1. Continue to operate an existing 1.9 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of
a mechanical bar screen, grit removal, parshall flume with flow measurement,
primary clarifier/digester, trickling filter, dual oxidation ditches, dual secondary
clarifiers, tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, chlorine contact chamber, sulfur
dioxide dechlorination, sludge thickener tank, aerobic sludge digester, and sludge
drying beds located at the Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility, Durham Street
Extension, Clayton, Johnston County, and
2. Discharge wastewater from said treatment works at the location specified on the
attached map into the Neuse River which is classified WS-1V NSW CA waters in Neuse
River Basin.
Town of Clayton
NPDES No. NCO025453

ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY LIGHT -DUTY ROAD, HARD OR
HARD SURFACE IMPROVED SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE E=:Nmm= UNIMPROVED ROAD
Latitude 35039'50" Longitude 78025'26'
Map #E25NW Sub -basin 3-04-02
Class WS-V NSW
(Discharge Class 01
Receiving Stream Neuse River
SCALE• 000
0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
QUAD LOCATI N Town of Clayton
■ NCO025453
Johnston County
W WTP

A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge 1.9 MGD of municipal wastewater from outfall 001. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
LUnits
Monitoring Requirements
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Location
Flow
1.9 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5 day (202C)2
[April 1- October 31 J
5.0 mg/I
7.5 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
BOD, 5 day (202C)2
[November 1- March 31 ]
10.0 mg/I
15.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
NH3 as N April 1- October 311
2.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1- March 31
4.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
3/Week
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
3/Week
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 µg/I
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
(NO2-N + NO3-N + TKN) 5
No
Effluent Limit (mg/l)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
No Effluent Limit (lb/month)
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
21,400 lb/year (Annual Mass Loading) 6
Annually
Calculated
Effluent
Total Phosphorus 7
2.0 mg/L (Quarterly Average)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
3/Week
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Conductivity
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
3/Week
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Chronic Toxicity8
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Lead [Through July 31, 2001 9
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Lead
[Beginning August 1, 200119
33.8 µg/I
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Copper
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Zinc
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Silver I
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
H10 16-9
Daily
Grab
Effluent
(Footnotes on next page)
Town of Clayton
NPDES No. NC0025453

A. R.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
(Continued)
Footnotes:
1. Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream at NCSR 1700, D - Downstream at
(1) NC Highway 42 and (2) NCSR 1908. Stream samples shall be grab samples and shall be
collected 3/Week during June - September and 1 /Week during the remaining months of the
year. Instream monitoring is provisionally waived in light of the permittee's
participation in the Lower Neuse Basin Association. Instream monitoring shall be
conducted as stated in this permit should the permittee end its participation in the
Associaiton.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not
exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l.
4. Total residual chlorine is required only if chlorine is used as a disinfectant (or elsewhere in the
process).
5. See Special Condition A. (2.), Total Nitrogen Monitoring.
6. The annual mass loading limit for total nitrogen shall become effective with the calendar year
beginning on January 1, 2003 unless it is provisionally waived per Special Condition A.(3.),
Annual Limits for Total Nitrogen.
7. The quarterly average for total phosphorus shall be the average of composite samples collected
weekly during the calendar quarter (January -March, April -June, July -September, October -
December).
8. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia dubico P/F at 1.6%: March, June, September, and December
[see Special Condition A.(4)]. Toxicity monitoring shall coincide with metals monitoring.
9. The lead limit of 33.8 Vg/1 will become effective August 1, 2001. A monitoring frequency of
2/month is required until that time. The Town may request that the Division re-evaluate the
lead monitoring data, should lead values be consistently (at least one year) reported below
33.8pg/1.
10. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall
be monitored daily at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts.
Town of Clayton
NPDES No. NCO025453

A. (2.) TOTAL NITROGEN MONITORING
The Permittee shall calculate the annual mass loading of total nitrogen as the sum of monthly
loadings, according to the following equations:
(1) Monthly Mass Loading (lb/mo) = TN x 3 x 8.34
where:
TN = the average total nitrogen concentration (mg/L) of the composite
samples collected during the month
Q = the total wastewater flow discharged during the month (MG/month)
8.34 = conversion factor, from (mg/L x MG) to pounds
(2) Annual Mass Loading (lb/yr) = E (Monthly Mass Loadings) for the calendar year
The Permittee shall report the total nitrogen concentration for each sample and the
monthly mass loading in the appropriate self -monitoring report and the annual mass
loading of total nitrogen in the December self -monitoring report for the year.
A. (3.) ANNUAL LIMITS FOR TOTAL NITROGEN
(a) The Neuse Nutrient Management Strategy rule for point sources (1) provides that
annual mass limits for total nitrogen shall be included in the permits for all
dischargers with permitted flows (as defined in the Strategy) greater than or equal to
0.5 MGD and that those nitrogen limits, including the limits in this permit, shall
become effective with the calendar year beginning on January 1, 2003.
(b) The Neuse rule also provides that members of a group compliance association shall
not be subject to individual annual mass limits for total nitrogen. At the time of permit
issuance, the Permittee had expressed interest in joining such an association.
Accordingly,
(1) the total nitrogen limit in Condition A(1) of this permit is deemed waived
provided that the following conditions are met:
(i) a formal agreement between the association and Environmental
Management Commission, as outlined in 15A NCAC 2B. 0234, is
established and is in effect; and
(ii) the Permittee is a party to said agreement; and
(iii) the association and the Permittee substantially conform with the
agreement.
(2) So long as the total nitrogen limit in Condition A. (1.) is waived, the group
nitrogen allocation established pursuant to the agreement referenced above and
any subsequent amendments is hereby incorporated as an enforceable part of
this permit.
(c) If the Division determines, at any time during the term of this permit, that these
conditions are not being met, it shall notify the Permittee in writing of this
determination and of its basis. The consequence of such a determination shall be that
the Permittee's annual mass limit for total nitrogen and its effective date shall be
reinstated immediately. The Division shall accept and consider written responses
received from the Permittee and/or the association within thirty (30) days of the
original notice before making a final decision and will provide that decision in writing.
Town of Clayton
NPDES No. NCO025453

A. (3.) ANNUAL LIMITS FOR TOTAL NITROGEN (cont'd.)
(d) The Permittee shall notify the Division in writing within five (5) working days if, at any
time during the term of this permit, the Permittee elects not to join the association, or
if it withdraws or otherwise loses its membership in the association. Notification shall
be sent to:
NC DENR / Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Footnote:
Neuse River Basin - Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy: Wastewater
Discharge Requirements (15A NCAC 2B. 0234).
A. (4.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphn.ia dubia at an effluent concentration of 1.6 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures
outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised
February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be
performed during the months of March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for
this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in
each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of
the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the
lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The
definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical
methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR 1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Town of Clayton
NPDES No. NCO025453

A. (4.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) (cont'd.)
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or
approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be
measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring
is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity
(AD test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the
month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The
report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up
testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
Town of Clayton
NPDES No. NCO025453

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
I'�'OfYI�CGh:-� ��•� ptvleloN OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION
%�-
MEMORANDUM
TO: David Goodrich
Discharge Permits Unit
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: Linda Sewall
Division Director
Division of Environmental Health
DATE: June 16, 2000
JL U 2 6 20. U
OENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
SUBJECT: Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit NCO025453
Town of Clayton/Little River Water Reclamation Facility
Johnston County
Reference is made to the above mentioned Draft National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit. We have reviewed this permit
application and determined that the proposed discharge will not be
sufficiently close to any existing or known proposed public water supply
intake so as to create an adverse effect on water quality.
We concur with the issuance of this permit provided the facility is
operated and maintained properly, the stated effluent limits are met prior to
discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated water
quality standards.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact us.
cc: J. Wayne Munden, Head, Technical Services Branch Y�•;1'' ° ;;,
'
1, J
LS/MLD/ncp i : 11
1994 MAIL VEROICE CII"'C" RGL EIGR, NORTH CAROLINA 2769a.l eaa
PHONF a 0-7"-R321
nTOTAL�P.01

•x'°" NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
July 19, 2000
Mr. Steve Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Clayton
P.O. Box 879
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Dear Mr. Biggs:
Over the past year, there has been much discussion between the Town
of Clayton and the Division of Water Quality regarding the wastewater flow
allocation to the Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility. This letter is in
response to concerns described in a letter from the Town dated March 13,
2000 and recent telephone conversations between the Town and the Division
staff.
15A NCAC 2H .0223, known as the `Eighty -Ninety" rule, examines a
facility's average flow data for a calendar year. When the annual average
flow exceeds the eighty or ninety percent thresholds, specific planning
requirements are needed before sewer line extensions will be issued. Sewer
line permits for a facility under such a moratorium may be issued on a case by
case basis if specific conditions are met.
}' M
The Town was not subject to the "Eighty -Ninety" rule based on its
1999 flow data. Each subsequent calendar year's flow data will be evaluated
to determine if the Town is subject to the rule.
During the first five months of 2000, the Town has operated at an
>:
,�,
average of 71.8 percent of hydraulic capacity. However, the approval of
recent sewer flow allocations, despite reconciliation of flow data on March 1,
I:.r .,..
2000, has increased the Town's "paper flow" to 103.3 percent of hydraulic
capacity. In a letter to the Town dated June 14, 1999, the Division explained
that "...once paper flow reaches 100 percent of the hydraulic capacity, the
sewer line permit requests will be denied because it is not known whether the
facility can adequately treat the excess amount of permitted flow". This
policy is based on G.S. 143-215.67(a), which states that "No person subject to
the provisions of G.S. 143-215.1, 143-215.108, or 143-215.109 shall willfully
cause or allow the discharge of any wastes ... to a waste -disposal system ... in
excess of the capacity of the disposal system ... or any wastes ... which the
disposal
system...cannot adequately treat
X WAZ�
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
websile: h2o.emstatemc.us PHONE [phone]e3 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

I agree that the Town is being proactive in securing additional treatment capacity. I
also recognize the excellent record of compliance with its NPDES permit. Yet, I cannot
allow the approval of future sewer line permits without treatment facilities designed to
adequately treat the anticipated flow.
There are three options that may help the Town resolve this current situation. The
Town may continue to seek expansion and re -rating of its wastewater treatment capacity
from 1.9 to 2.5 MGD. When an Authorization to Construct has been issued, the issuance of
new sewer line permits will be evaluated. The Town may also pursue additional hydraulic
capacity at the Central Johnston County wastewater treatment facility. Finally, the Town
may continue the reconciliation of flow data to obtain additional treatment capacity.
To further discuss this situation, a meeting between the staff of the Raleigh Regional
Office and Town officials can be arranged at your request. If you have any questions, please
contact Ken Schuster, Regional Water Quality Supervisor at [phone].
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Coleen Sullins, Water Quality Section Chief
Raleigh Regional Office
Non -discharge Permitting Unit
Non -discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
NPDES Permitting Unit
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

TOWN OF CLAYTON
"SERVICE" OPERATIONS CENTER
"ENVIRONMENT'
ELECTRIC SERVICE T., PUBLIC WORKS
[phone] r"` o� �
[phone]
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ;� WATER RECLAMATION
[phone] �'Aj. ova! [phone]
April 19, 2000
Susan A. Wilson
NC-DENR-DWQ-NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC
27699-1617
Re: Lead limit in pending NPDES Permit #NC0025453
Dear Ms. Wilson:
APR 20 200
DERR - W,qT R
QUALITY I
POIrl1- SOvi+r'F
I am writing this letter to request that the lead limit be changed to monitor only on the
Town's pending NPDES Permit, and also that the frequency of testing be returned to
twice a month. With the exception of one data point in August 1999 which registered 59
ug/l, the facility has not exceeded the 33.8 ug/1 acute toxicity standard in 1999 or 2000.
The facility's lead levels have been consistently 18 ug/l or less with the majority of the
readings < 10 ug/l from Jan. 1999 through March 2000.
The Town requests the Division of Water Quality's consideration in this matter, please
call me directly at 919-553-1536 if you have any questions.
ames Warren
ORC, Town of Clayton, NC
xc: Steve Biggs
Tim Simpson
-J� i%PK eD T41 S, 4/k9%o
653 Highway 42 West • P.O. Box 879 • Clayton, North Carolina 27520 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

ao
15-3
FAA 5-5,3 -M
&ILL SLILSMIT774q CoAkA)L6j4r5

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0025453, Clayton/ Little Creek WRF
Facility Information
Applicant/ FacilitName:
Town of Clayton/ Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 879, Clayton, NC 27520
Facility Address:
Durham Street Extension
Permitted Flow
1.9 MGD
e of Waste:
- 31% Ind., -69% Domestic
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Johnston
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Neuse River
Regional Office:
RRO
Stream Classification:
WS-IV NSW CA
SI: 27-41.3
Quad
E25NW
Clayton
303(d) Listed?:
Yes
Permit Writer:
S. Wilson
Subbasin:
030402
Date:
March 31, 000
Drainage Area (m12):
1150
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
186 (regulated)
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
i
IWC (%):
1.6
Primary SIC Code:
14952
SUMMARY
Clayton operates a 1.9 MGD wastewater treatment facility that discharges into the Neuse River.
This permit was noticed during 1998. The facility relocated from Little Creek to the Neuse River
(due to potential impacts on Little Creek due to downstream impoundments and depressed DOs).
The previous draft reduced the oxygen consuming waste limits from 10/4 to 5/2 (BOD5/NH3-N);
this permit reflects this change with no compliance schedule.
Metals requirements are slightly different than the previous draft due to the statistical analysis of
updated monitoring data.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirement: Chronic P/F @ 1.6% (also recommended with renewal)
Clayton has passed its whole effluent toxicity testing requirement since March 1996.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: BASED ON THE PREVIOUS 2 YEARS
Clayton has had no limit excursions during the past 2 years (this is based on computer
download only).
INSTREAM MONITORING:
Clayton is part of the Lower Neuse Basin Association (LNBA) and is not required to perform the
instream monitoring required in this permit.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
Clayton has proposed to become a member of the Neuse Nutrient Trading Association. Special
language has been inserted into the permit regarding the compliance stipulation for total
nitrogen. The total phosphorus limit of 2 mg/I was instituted in the previous permit.
Based on the reasonable potential to exceed the water quality standard analysis
(RPA), Chromium has been eliminated from the permit (nickel and cadmium had
been removed from the permit during a modification dated November 14, 1997.
Current available data reflects no potential to exceed the water quality standard).
Clayton
rnrs Rcnc,.,:d
Pa. e i

Lead will be limited. Copper, silver and zinc will continue to be monitored due to
the potential to exceed the action level standard at the acute level. Copper and Zinc
will be monitored at a lower frequency (1/month instead of 2/month) due to
Clayton's "pass" on toxicity testing since 1996. Silver will be monitored 2/month.
Reasonable
Potential?
Limit?
Current
Requirement
Limit?
Renewal
Daily
max.
Weekly Avg.
Acute
daily max
Chronic
Standard
wkly av
Cadmium
No
Requirement
No
Re ' mt
Drop
Drop
Limit
No re mt
MON.
Monitor
Monitor
Chromium
Monitor
Cyanide
Monitor
Lead
Monitor
33.8
Nickel
No requirement
Copper
Monitor
Silver
Monitor
Zinc
Monitor
Arsenic, mercury, molybdenum, and selenium (as well as the above parameters) are
monitored through Clayton's pretreatment Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP) .
These parameters were not present in amounts to warrant a limit or monitoring
requirement (less than detect levels) .
A residual chlorine limit has been added in this permit (the facility received an ATC
for dechlorination in 1996) .
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: April 12, 2000 (est.)
Permit Scheduled to Issue: May 29, 2000 (est.)
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Susan Wilson at [phone] ext. 510.
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
Ck vtort
NFIDE-S+Rencw;d
['a..,e

I.
` MOST RECENT CHRONOLOGY (PAST 4 YEARS)
3/31/00
1993, September - Previous permit issued (included limits for discharge at Little
Creek and 1.9 MGD on the Neuse River)
1995 - Clayton joined the LNBA.
1997, November - Authorization to Construct permit (CG&L) - modifications to plant
including tertiary filter and UV disinfection.
1997, November - Permit modification that removed monitoring for nickel and cadmium
based on no reasonable potential to exceed WQ standard.
1997, December - Applied for permit renewal.
1998, April - Permit was drafted for Clayton. Similar to this draft permit. Proposed
BOD5/NH3-N limits of 5/2 to be implemented within one year. Mass load for nitrogen is
the same as this draft permit (21,400 lbs/year).
1998, June through 2000, March - DWQ has to revise nitrogen allocation, submit TMDL
for EPA approval, and revise Neuse rules. In February 2000, EPA approved NCDWQs TMDL
and the EMC approved revised temporary Neuse rules.
O.J 50rG. LtMiT5 Fz:>2 Z• Jr Mob.
(of-tAu y Rv-QU€ST D Mo' WWL�D PGeDi AT' MiN.) UPD /E
oti TN t oh-D � pairO i IAA

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
�p
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E N R
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
FAX: [phone]
4/7/00
FAX TO: Michael Wicker I FAX NUMBER: 910/692-7342 1
Re.: draft for
FROM: Susan A. Wilson
PHONE: [phone], ext. 5
XII
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 11
Michael,
Please pass along this copy of Clayton's permit to Mr. Biggs (Town Manager). If they
have comments, please let me know (we'd like to get this one issued fairly soon - not
required to publicly notice again). Thanks. (map is not included)
Susan Wilson
** If you have received this fax by mistake call: [phone], ext, 510 or ext. 511.

` State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
XMA1
and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality 6,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E N R
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
FAX: [phone]
4/24/00
FAX TO: Randy Jones, RRO
Re.: fact sheet & draft for
FROM: Susan A. Wilson /r
PHONE: [phone], ext. 510
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:12
Randy,
1 01 1L1_i iie.
Here's what I sent out to Clayton. This one had been noticed in 1998, so it was not
noticed again. I added a lead limit, based on acute toxicity, which was not in the
previous draft. I also enclosed their comments. Thanks.
Susan Wilson
** If you have received this fax by mistake call: [phone], ext. 510 or ext. 511.

Memorandum
To: Susan Wilson
From: Christie Jackson
Date: 03 / 21 / 00
Re: Town of Clayton (NC0025453)
I did not enter RPA Data for Arsenic, Selenium, Cyanide,
Mercury and Cadmium as they all had < values recorded on
the DMR's.
The self -monitoring summary report indicated that this
facility failed the tox. test in February of 1996. You may
want to review the DMR's for additional information on Zinc,
Silver and Copper.
"I'\1 - c i
1

f
LONG TERM MONITORING PLAN REQUEST FORM
FACILITY: 7-o w h o lay ton
NPDES NO.: Nc G.Oz :� 1:5"3
EXPIRATION DATE: 0 -- ,31 /1 `/gl3
REGION:
P&E REQUESTOR:
PRETREATMENT CONTACT:
DATE OF REQUEST:
(INDICATE THE STATUS OF PRETREATMENT PROGRAM:
1) THE FACILITY HAS NO SIU'S AND SHOULD NOT HAVE PRETREATMENT LANGUAGE.
_� 2) THE FACILITY HAS A PREATREATMENT PROGRAM' }
3) ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS REGARDING THE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ATTACHED.
PERMITTED FLOW: 1,
%INDUSTRIAL 31, 3
% DOMESTIC g.
Pretreatment Unit Staff (Region)
All L-TIV9-lutv,+ Jata-
a1P E'Le- �1rc �� �w� +0 n,: ����., UV d��-��
c- �k c;4 V b C L I . c pt L TA4 P)
�t J. q
I��►► 30D 1J� _� T5S �ec�) to �ar�h b0
F ID Cj l� 5, 3 1 s
Ttji IV �6�G T1105 P I-lorc-s 403` iV -Fo (.J�eIC , (-O A S �
V
0 5 �
v �

Facility Name= Clayton WWTP
Parameter= Lead
NPDES # = NCO025453
Standard =
25 pg/I
Ow (MGD) = 1.9
7010s (cfs)= 186
n
BDL=1/2DL Actual
Data RESULTS
IWC (%) = 1.56
1
2.50
<5 Std Dev.
2
2.50
<5 Mean
FINAL RESULTS
3
5.20
5.20 C.V.
Lead
4
2.50
<5
Max. Pred Cw 147.5
5
2.50
<5
Allowable Cw 1603.9
6
5.00
5.00 Mult Factor=
7
12.00
12.00 Max. Value
8
8.00
8.00 Max. Pred Cw
9
16.00
16.00 Allowable Cw
(Regulated flow on Neuse)
10
59.00
WS-IV NSW CA
11
8.60
9.-60
12
2.50
<5
%Z FA J
13
18.00
18.00
Y
Y b
14
12.00
12.00
/} LG .
15
11.00
11.00
16
8.00
8.00
33, S
17
5.50
5.50
�tcl�
(VX
18
2.50
<5
19
2.50
<5
PUT ! tj FFc� i L v>^ %
20
6.20
6.20
21
2.50
<5
22
2.50
<5
23
2.50
<5
24
2.50
<5
25
7.30
7.30
26
2.50
<5
27
6.91
6.91
28
11
11
29
19
19
30
18
18
31
17
17
32
8.98
8.98
33
52
34
25
25
35
8
8
36
15
15
37
10
10
38
9
9
39
50
4j80p
40
14
14
41
2.5
<5
42
5
5
43
10
<20
44
10
<20
45
2.5
<5
46
5
<10
47
2.5
<5
48
2.5
<5
12.320026
10.5138
1.1717957
2.5
59 pg/I
147.5 pg/I
1603.9 pg/I

49 5 <10
50 5 <10

c
Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Ow (MGD) =
7010s (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
Clayton WWTP
NCO025453
1.9
186
1.56
re ulated flow
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw 187.2
Allowable Cw 1603.9
Regulated flow on Neuse
WS-IV NSW CA
�Z FA v
�CALC)
?,&I
lb it Lle
Oo (2►"p,
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 25 Ng/l
n BDL=1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1
2.50
<5
Std Dev.
7.545418
2
2.50
<5
Mean
5.6
3
2.50
<5
C.V.
1.3473961
4
26.00
26.00
5
2.50
<5
6
2.50
<5
Mult Factor =
7.2
7
2.50
<5
Max. Value
26 Ng/l
8
10.00
<20
Max. Pred Cw
187.2 /rg/I
9
2.50
<5
Allowable Cw
1603.9 jrg/l
10
2.50
<5
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

8
Facility Name =
NPDES #
Qw (MGD) =
7Q10s (cfs)=
1WC (%) =
Clayton WWTP
NCO025453
1.9
186
1.56
FINAL RESULTS
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw 10
Allowable Cw 3207.9
Regulated flow on Neuse
WS-IV NSW CA
No �.-P
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50 Pg/I
n BDL_1/2DL Actual Data RESULTS
1
1.00 <2
Std Dev.
1.5861647
2
2.10
2.10
Mean
1.96
3
1.00
<2
C.V.
0.8092677
4
1.00
<2
5
4.60
4.60
6
1.00
<2
Mult Factor =
2
7
1.00
<2
Max. Value
5 pg/l
8
1.00
<2
Max. Pred Cw
10 pg/l
9
1.00
<2
Allowable Cw
3207.9 erg/I
10
1.00
<2
11
1.00
<2
12
1.00
<2
13
1.00
<2
14
1.00
<2
15
1.00
<2
16
1.00
<2
17
1.00
<2
18
1.00
<2
19
3.00
3.00
20
2.30
2.30
21
1.00
<2
22
1.00
<2
23
1.00
<2
24
1.00
<2
25
1.00
<2
26
1.00
<2
27
2.5
<5
28
2.5
<5
29
1
<2
30
1
<2
31
1
<2
32
5
<10
33
1
<2
34
2
2
35
1
<2
36
1
<2
37
1
<2
38
5
5
39
5
<10
40
1
<2
41
1
<2
42
5
5
43
5
<10
44
5
<10
45
1
<2
46
5
<10
47
1
<2
48
1
<2

1.
49 5 < 10
50 5 <10
iI
�1
a,
j�

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring SUDvitary
March 15,
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
YEAR JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
J1N
ILL
AVG
SEP
OCT
NO"
DEC
Claremont 80uto WWFI' Perm cur lira: 611%,
1990 Nall
...
...
I
-.
--
-
--
--
---
NC0026549N01 Begin7/1/1995 Frequency QPIF + Jan Apr Jul Oct
NonContp Single
1097 1
...
I
...
...
1
...
---
1
Ciumy: Catawba Region:MRO Subbaaim CT832
1098 1
-
.-
I
...
...
I
--
...
I
...
...
PF: 0.10 Spiel
1999 I
...
...
I
...
...
t
...
...
...
]QI0: 0.10 IWC(%)617S u`d`r
20001
Claremont-MeLte Creek W W ri, Pemt chr Inn: IN (Gran)
1998 Pes.
...
..-
Pa..
...
---
Pa.
...
...
pass
NC0081370 I Begin8Ji/1995 Frequency Q PIF + Jan Apr Jul Oct
N.uComp Single
1997 Pas.
...
...
Paea
...
---
Paas
---
...
Pa..
County:Catawba Region:MRO Subbasin: CTB32
1908 Pas.
...
---
Paea
...
---
Pasa
--.
...
Pa..
-..
-..
PF: 0.3 sp:1
19BB Pee.-
...
Pasa
--
Paas
...
...
Pasa
-
--
7Q1D:5.0 IWC('A)9.0 oldv.
200o Pas.
Clarinet C u. Ml. liolly Plant PERM CHR LN4: 1.9%
Y 19 --
---
Pa..
...
...
Pass
...
...
Pa..
---
Lal.
NC0004375rBp1 Be, ill9(311991 Frequency QPIT + MrSJ.,.Sep Dec
NonComp Single
1907 Paaa
---
Pus
---
--
Pass
---
Pau
-.
---
---
Pa..
C... 1,meemanburg Region:MRO Subbmim CTB34
1995 --
---
Paes
---
...
Pess
---
---
Pass
...
--.
Paas
M. 3.9N
1989...
...
pass
...
...
Peae
Paas
--.
NR
P...
...
NR
]Q10: 95.0 IWCI%15.9g
good ...
Clacking WWII' Perm chr list 90%
toe Flit
...
...
Pan.
--
---
paas
..
all
Fat
Fail
a..
NO002I6101001 Begin IVI/1999 Frequency Jan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp Single
19B) Pas.
---
...
Fall
Fell
Fail
Fat
Fail
"Is
Paas
Pa..
Pass
County:Bladcn Regku:FRO Subwsin:LUM-58
logo Pasa
---
---
Fait
Pass
---
Pass
...
...
Pas.
...
--
PF: 0.24 Biwal
1999 Pa..
...
---
Pen.
...
---
Fat
Paea
---
Pas.
---
---
7Q10: 0.0 IWC(%)1W oedn'
zddd Fat
PERM CHR LN: 1.6%
1986 Pass
..-
1.11
Is..
..
aes
---
--
ass
...
..
es.
25453Ap1 Regin101111993 Frequency QPIF + Marlun Sep Dec
NonComp SINGLE
1997 ...
...
Paes
...
...
Paea
...
_.
Pass
-
---
Pass
Countylolummt RCgion:RRO Subbacin: NEU02
loge --
---
Page
...
...
Pass
---
-
Pas.
--
--
Pass
PF, 1.9 st...
18B8 ...
...
Peaa
...
...
Pa.
...
...
Pas.
...
...
Pass
7Q10: I86 IWCI•b)1.6 O`d"'
2000 ...
Cleveland CrI. Scbo9R- Burns IIS PERM CHR LIM: 90% (GRAB) TB. 61 NO TOX 7IIN
t --
---
Pan
Pa.
--
Pa.
--
--
aas
- -
..
aas
NC0066411MI Begin91111994 Frequency QPT + Marlun Sep Dec
Notice"SINGLE
1997 --
---
Fall
Fat
NR
Pau
--
-.
Fat
Pass
...
Pasa
County: Cleveland Region:MRO Subbmin:BRDOJ
loge --
---
Paes
---
...
Pax
---
---
Pen.
--
---
Pass
PF O.O175 Slnnl
INS ...
...
Pau
---
Pa..
--
---
Lala
Pa.s
Pass
7QID. 0.0 IWC('A)IN Ordv
2000 ...
Cleveland MilLoW 1 PERM CHR LIM: 2.4%; 17 EXP>.78MGD O 3.4%
1996 - -
..
es.
---
Pa..
---
---
tau
Pass
---
Pass
NC00041204)(11 Begit191111993 Frequency QPIF + Marlun Sep Da,
NonComp SINGLE
1997 --
---
Pass
_.
...
Pess
...
---
Ut.
Paas
--
Pass
County.Cleveland RegiNIMRO Subbmin: BRO04
190. --
--
uu
Pau
...
Pasa
...
---
Pass
--
-.-
Pass
PF 098 pa
1898 ...
...
Pess
--.
...
Paa.
...
.-.
Pa..
---
...
Paaa
7QI0: 49.40 IWCI%)2.4 Orden'
2000
Clevaland W WTP Penn chr ling: 3.21:
1995
---
Pass
---
..
...
...
--
a..
Pass
NCO0d98674101 Beginl/l/1994 Frequency Q PIP + Mar Jun Sep Dec
NonComp Single
1997 ...
...
Pess
--
...
Paaa
...
...
Pa..
--
--
"I.
Comny:Rowat R.,,..:MRO Subbuthl YADDS
1995 Pas.
...
Pen
-
-
Paaa
...
_.
Pas.
-..
...
Pass
ff. O.10
t998 -_-
--
Fail
Peae
-
L.I.Lau
Peae
...
Pass
- -
Paul
. .der
]QID: Id.O IWC(%)3.2 `d`r,
2000 ...
(Tinton-larkim WFCF Pa. chr Iim: 90111,
logs -.
...
3290
--
>
--
--
>
--
NC0020117,001 Begin ER11996 Frequency QPIF + MmJun Sep Dar
NonComp Single
1W7 --
--
>90
--
-.
>90
--
---
>93
-.
>B0
County:Sampson Rcgion:FRO Subbasin:CPF19
no --.
.-
>90
--
--
>a0
---
--
>90
--
>913
PF 5.0
1889 ...
.-.
Peee
...
...
Pass
---
---
Paes
...
---
Fat
7QIQ 0.0 IWC('b)100 n`de4
2000 Pax
>100
CMl ludmssies, Igo-Cl nham Div. Pegg ehr IN: 1.9%
t ---
Fa..
...
---
Pa.
...
---
Pa.
---
---
Pa..
---
NC00D531b0D1 Begid9ll/19N Frequancy Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov
+ NonComp Single
1997 -
Pass
...
---
Pau
...
---
Paes
--
Paaa
County:Smry Region: WSRO Subbuin: YA002
t BBB ...
Peae
--
...
Psu
...
...
Pa.
---
---
Law
Pau
PF:4.0
1899 ..-
Peea
-..
---
Pass
-..
---
Pau
---
-..
Peen
---
order
]Q10 Jld IWC(%)1.96 dN.e
2000 ...
Pau
CtjU Irwin Creek W WTP Pa. cN Iim: 83%
Y 1090 >
-.
-.
>95
...
...
>
...
...
>e
NC002494.10001 Begia11/1I1996 Frequency QP/F + Ju Apr Jul Oct
N.,,Comp Single
1997 >95
---
---
>95
...
---
Pan
---
---
Pa.s
Coumy:Mecklenburg Region:MRO Subbnin:CIB34
loge Pa..
...
...
Pau
...
...
Pass
_.
.--
Pass
---
---
ff. 15.0 SraW
1999 a10g
---
...
.100
...
.--
,Im
--.
...
teN
>100
7QIQ 4.9 IWQSL83.0 older,
good >I00
Y Pre 1996 Date Available
LEGEND:
PERM = Pemsit Requlrenan LE' = Adminivnlive Leger - Tar Frequency = Monitoring frequency: Q. Quarterly: M- Monthly: BM- BimouddY SA- Semianne.11y; A- Annually; OtYD- Only whca discharging; D- Dkeamiued moritl nitog re
B gin = Firer month required iving 7QI0 = R n stream low Bow criterion Ic + = quarterly nictitating increases m nlumldy upon failure or Month that lasting must occur - es. Jan, AN. Jul. 0 NanComp = Current Complianm Raconteurs
PF= Pemtitted BOW(MGD) IWC%= lnnreut waste cousemrai P/F=Pus/Fuil tell AC=Acute CHR=Chronic
Data Notation: f - Finland Minnow: - Ceriodaphnia sp.: my - Myeid shrimp; CIIV - Chronic value; P - Mortality of atated personage in higheo comenamtion: at - Performed by DWQ Aquae Toe Unit b
Reporting Notation: --- = Dam net required: NR . Nat repor Facility Activity Status; I - Inactive, N - Newly Daued(To cumlmc0: H - Active but teat dischaging: t-More dam .,.liable for month in qtm ni.I; = ORC sign.
10

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: (Marry Cabe)
Date February 16, 1998
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION f� eCJ
County Johnston 111 )))
Permit No. NC0025453
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:
Little Creek Water Reclamation Facility
Mr. Steven Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Clayton
P.O.Box 879
Clayton, NC 27520
2. Date of Investigation: January 21, 1998
3. Report Prepared by: Danny Smith
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
James Warren - ORC
[phone]
5. Directions to Site: From Ral., take Hwy 70 East to Clayton,
turn to the right just past the Hwy 42 (south) exit into the
Cemetery. Follow the road through the Cemetery to the WWTP. (see
attached map).
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35`39'54" Longitude:7L25'33"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility
site and discharge point on map.

U.S.G.S. Quad No. E2 NW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Clayton
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application ?
X Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
Facility is located adjacent to the flood plain of
Little Creek.
9. Location of nearest dwelling:
greater than 500 ft.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Neuse River
a. Classification: Neuse River WS-IV NSW CA
Index #: 27-41.3
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-04-02
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses:
This WWTP discharges into an upper Costal Plain portion of the
Neuse River (Right Bank), downstream from Raleigh's wastewater
outfall. The next significant/large downstream water supply use is
Smithfield.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 1.9MGD
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? 1.9MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? Treatment Capacity is 1.9 MGD,
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorization to Construct issued in the previous two years:
An April 29, 1997 A to C was issued for the construction of a
dual -train, traveling -bridge tertiary filter, backwash return
pump station; installation of a U.V. disinfection unit in the

existing chlorine contact tank; and all associated site work, and
yard piping. Note: no change in flow capacity would be
achieved by this A to C.
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities:
The facility located in Clayton is a 1.9 MGD activated sludge
wastewater treatment plant whose influent treatment consists of an
automatic bar screen, and grit removal. Here the wastestream
splits. A portion of the wastewater is pumped up hill to the
primary clarifier, the water flows by gravity to a secondary
clarifier/digester, through a trickle filter where it then combines
with the original wastestream. Both the influent wastewater and the
portion of initially treated wastewater flows to the oxidation
ditches (2) , then to the clarifiers (2), and to C12 contact
chamber (UV has not been constructed yet). S02 is then added and
mixed to the wastestream. The effluent is then pumped
approximately 7 miles to the Neuse River.
sludge: drum thickener (polymer addition), thickener tank,
400,000 gallon Holding tank, sludge drying beds
This wastewater plant is currently a Class IV facility and Mr.
James Warren, the Operator in Responsible Charge, is a Certified
Grade IV operator.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities: NA
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
Ammonia and chlorine are the only likely toxicity concerns
for this facility. (note: they have an A to C to install U.V.
disinfection)
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development_ approved
should be required not needed

2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
permit no.
Wallace Woodall
Rose Hill
Residuals are taken to Johnston County Landfill,
Residual Contractor
Telephone No,
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP
PFRP Other
c. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet): Class IV
4. SIC Code(s): 4952
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular
facilities i.e.., non -contact cooling water discharge from a
metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary 01 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 2 5 2 2
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?
Yes,
An April 29, 1997 A to C was issued to construct of a dual -train,
traveling -bridge tertiary filter, backwash return pump station;
installation of a U.V. disinfection unit in the existing chlorine
contact tank; and all associated site work, yard piping with no
change in flow capacity.
September 26, 1998 - Approval of the Plans and Specifications -
with eligibility for loan funding = from: Bobby Blowe, Construction
Grants and Loans

2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests:
NA
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) NA
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation:NA
Connection to Regional Sewer System: NA
Subsurface: NA
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
During the inspection it was noted that the effluent flow meter
was being repaired. A review of the effluent data indicated that
there were no NPDES limit exceedances (including monthly average
flow)observed since the last inspection.
RRO recommends that a footnote be placed on Chlorine to allow that
Chlorine be conducted only if chlorine is used as disinfection
(flexibility when UV is in operation).
The RRO recommends renec3al,o "NPDES Permit NC0025453.
Signatureeof report preparer
Wate ualt�ional Supervisor
DD to

Town of Clayton
DOUGLAS A. McCORMAC
Mayor
RONALD E. GURGANUS
Mayor Pro Tom
STEVEN BIGGS
Tmvn Manager
GARY RAGLAND
Tmvn Attorney
LINDA SUE CANADAY
Toxm Clerk
May 22, 1998
Mary Cabe
Division of Water Quality, DENR
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Draft NPDES Permit # NC0025453, Town of Clayton, NC
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Robert J. Ahlert
Bob Satterfield
James H. Lipscomb
Cameron Mercer
On behalf of the Town of Clayton, NC I would like to comment on the proposed nitrogen
limits being placed upon the Town's wastewater treatment plant. The proposed limit of
21,400 pounds of nitrogen per year averages out to be 3.7 mg/l at a design flow of 1.9
mg/l. House Bill 515 passed by the Legislature called for limits based upon 5.5 mg/l of
total nitrogen. We feel it is unfair to base more stringent limits on our facility until the
legislation has passed, or before anyone has been able to see the effects of the original
legislation. The costs for meeting the 5.5 mg/l of nitrogen will be significant, and to reach
the 3.7 will be more disproportional when compared to price per pound removed. This
burden is considerable to the citizens of a small town such as Clayton.
The Town is committed to protecting the Neuse River as evidenced by two major
upgrades within 3 years. However, these mandates by the EMC and the Legislature
should be accompanied by funding mechanisms to help distribute the costs more evenly.
In closing, the Town would like to see the limits changed to reflect the existing
legislation.
We look forward to your reply, please contact me directly at 919-553-1522 if you have
any questions.
w
CD
Sincerely,
Cn
-.
G,
R
Steven Biggs
Ta
3c
m ..
Town Manager, Clayton NC
00
m
P.O. Box 879 • Clayton, North Carolina 27520 • [phone] • FAX [phone]

r�
030402-
NCL��P CmP l c c
CC ZS q2a��7 Cr
TP =
P46voo5;q 2/? 8
27J, 3
7 A/C I 1441121
i
7 ry/to
TF6
o
Loki -rVAj &PA
2 � p
ITS Fig /2
U b
Nil_ IN Tr74 k-c
/kLc's I�t � �i2s'",` � � T� A EL� � G 41 2
.r r 2 At %
D14_ 50 _
N
Pena, I -r Awp Ff
�
aus Pow `r (sc7Lkev � td 3 '
0 ZO
Clk ,
� r►off-- �- i � b � � `71 �
art, / (� L� PA+ 7
�i

!, - 4
a",

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor �o
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary E N
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 16, 1997
Mr. R. Steven Biggs, Town Manager
Town of Clayton
P.O. Box 879
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Subject: Receipt of NPDES Permit Application
Permit No. NCO025453
Town of Clayton WWTP
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Biggs:
The Division acknowledges receipt of your signed NPDES permit application, Standard
Form A, received on December 1, 1997 for the above referenced facility.
The Division has also received your letter dated November 24, 1997 requesting limits that
will be effective June 1, 1998. Due to the passing of Housebill 515 and the subsequent need to meet
a Total Nitrogen limit of 5.5 mg/i for facilities above 0.5 MGD discharging to nutrient sensitive
waters (NSW), the Division will allow an implementation schedule to allow for construction for the
facility to meet a Total Nitrogen limit of 5.5 mg/l, a BOD5 limit of 5.0 mg/1 and a NH3 as Nitrogen
limit of 2.0 mg/l. The facility already has a total Phosphorus limit of 2.0 mg/1 in the existing permit.
Please send any information regarding modified construction plans as soon as possible.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations
from the Regional Supervisor for this project prior to final action by the Division. You will be
advised of any continents, recommendations, questions, or other information necessary for the
application review.
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our regional office prepare a staff report on this
request prior to final action by the Division. This application has been assigned to me for review.
If you have any questions, I can be contacted at [phone], extension 5IS.
Sincerely,]
L. Cabe
cc: Raleigh Regional Office/Water Quality Section (with attachment)
NPDES Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

TOWN OF CLAYTON
'SERVICE'
OPERATIONS CENTER
'ENVIRONMENT'
ELECTRIC SERVICE
fr• ""`
PUBLIC WORKS
(919) 553-1SW
\j
[phone]
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1
WATER RECLAMATION
[phone]/
[phone]
Date: November 24, 1997
Mary Cabe
Division of Water Quality/ NPDES Permitting Group
DENR
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: Future NPDES Permit Limits NC 0025453
Dear Ms. Cabe:
LUV 2 6 l::�
The Town of Clayton is requesting your office to comment in writing on the future permit
limits that will be in effect beginning June 1, 1998. As previously discussed by phone, the
Town is currently accepting bids for tertiary treatment and UV disinfection as part of an
agreement to meet 5 BOD, 2 ammonia-n and 2 T-phosphorus, as outlined in the Town's
201 agreement. This current upgrade does not address nitrogen removal, which has been
mandated in House Bill 515 for the Neuse River Basin.
The Town has requested to extend the project through your office and construction loans
and grants, so we may incorporate nitrogen removal into the project to meet the most
recent requirements. However, if we must meet 5/2/2 as of June 1, 1998 this would not be
possible.
The Town appreciates your past and future cooperation. Please call me at 919-553-1536 if
you have any questions.
Sincerely,
James Warren,
LCWRF, Supt.
xc: Tim Simpson
Steve Biggs
653 Highway 42 West • PO Box 879 • Clayton, NC 27520 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Managetnent
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
4 lames G. Martin, Governor
A. Preston Howard, Jr,,P.E.
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Acting Director
Regional_GfScaa November 3,1990
Asheville RECEIVED IN CV 5 '092
7041251-6208
Mr. Robert Hyatt
Fayetteville Town Manager
919/486-041 Town of Clayton
P.O. Box 879
Mooresville Clayton, North Carolina27520
704/663-1699
Subject: Speculative NPDSS PermitLimitations
Raleigh Town of Clayton WNYTP
n
Y
I' 919/571-4700 NPDES Permit No. NC0025453
Johnston County
Washington
919/946.6481 Dear I& Hyatt;
Wilmington The North Carolina Division ofBnvuonrn=W Management (NCDEM) is in receipt of
919/395.3900 your letter dated October 16,1992, requesting speculative NPD11S permit limitations for a
proposed expansion of the subject facility to 2.5 MGDI In your letter you request speculative
Winston-Salem limits at five different locations, NCDEM Technical Support Branch has completed the review
i 919/896-7007 of your request and provides the following recommendations;
( Neuse River at NC 42 and NCSR 2509
it The Neuse River is regulated by Palls Dam. The proposed discharge site at NC 42 is
located approximately 10 miles downstream from the Raleigh Neuse WWT'P discharge and 14.5
miles upstream from the Town of Smithfield water intake. This rivet segment is classified as
WS-IV waters. At this point, the river has a drainage area of 1,150 sq. miles and an estimated
minimum flow of 189 efs. It is recommended that the discharge be located at least 1,000 ft
downstream from the NC 42 bridge to avoid interference with boih the NCDEM ambient station
and the USGS gaging station located at this site.
The proposed discharge point at NCSR 2509 is located approximately 2.0 miles
downstream from the Raleigh Neuse WWTP discharge, 7.3 miles upstream from NC 42 and 22.0
miles upstream from the Town of Smithfield water intake. This river segment is classified as C-
NSW waters, However, the stream is classified WS-V NSW less than 0.1 miles downstream
from this proposed discharge site. It is estimated that at NCSR 2509 the Neuse River is
characterizedby a minimum flow of 187 efs.
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone],
An Equal Opportunity Affumadve Action Employer
21d SWOIidHM3 0 WOiAdID WdS2:60

s
Mr. Robert Hyatt
Page 2
For both the NC 42 and NCSR 2509 sites, the following permit limitations are recommended
based on a field calibrated water quality model for the Neese River mainstem, and NCDBM's current
procedures for wasteload allocation&. Also, these limitations reflect current industrial waste epntribudons
to the WWTP:
Parameter
summer
Wiatar
RODS (mg11)
5
I 10
tl
., 3
NH3-N (raga)
2
4
DO (MO)
6
6
Papal Collfomt (nsa)
200
200
TSS (mgA)
30
30
Total RetidurdChlorino(ul;A)
28
28
Cadmium (UBA)
Monitor
Monitor
Copp" Nall)
Monitor
Monitor
Nickel(usa)
Monitor
Monitor
Lead 00
Monitor
Monier
Silver(uaA)
Monitor
Mortitar
Total Phospli ms (mill)
2
2
PH (SU)
6-9
6-9
r lfle Crmk at Current Disc arse Pnint
According to USGS flow statistics provided to NCDEM in June 1992, Little Creek at the Current
discharge site is characterized by a drainage area = 6.01 sq. miles, 87Q10 = 0.1 cfs, 30Q2 = 0.79 cis and
QAVG = 6,9 cfs. As indicated in previous correspondence to the Town dated February 20, 1990,
September 27, 1991 and May 8, 1992, this facility discharges into the headwaters of a pond located
approximately 2,5 miles downstream from the discharge site. Information collected in the pond during
the summer 1990 indicated a high probability of algal blooms to occur under appropriate conditions.
Although the 1990 study indicated nutrient enrichment, the actual eutrophic response indicators (Le ,
chlorophyll -a, pH and dissolved oxygen) were not far from meeting State standards in the pond.
In order to address some.of the uncertainty. regarding water quality conditions, eutrophication
poienifal and hydraulic characteristics of tho reeelving,s7eam, a field visitwps conducted by NCDEM on
August 26,1992, A beaver dam was discovered upstream from the discharge which resulted In very low
flow at the discharge point. Near NCSR 1560, approximately 2.0 miles downstream from the discharge,
the stream did nor have significant advecdve transport as far upstream as the field crew could observe
from the bridge. Sediments have accumulated in the headwaters of the pond resulting in a dam like
situation at the headwaters of the pond. This condition createsi a second impoundment of the creek
upstream of the pond during low flow periods. Although a substantial rainstorm event had occurred the
weak prior to NCDEM's field visit that should have flushed the pond, eutrophicabon of the pond was
apparent as evidenced by supersaturation of dissolved oxygen (00).
The information and data collected during the August 26. 1992 survey were used to develop a
Level B model to simulate DO concentrations in the receiving waters from the discharge site to the
headwaters of the pond. The model predicts that substandard DO concentrations are lijtely to occur at
existing discharge limitations. Therefore, advanced ter** treatment will be required at this location
upon expansion from 1.5 MOD. .
Val
I
SIZIld'43d0 NOiAd-lD WdSZ:ED LB, BY AN
w

S r
Mr. Robert Hyatti�ai
Page 3�i
i
`i
However, since 1) NCDEM has placed the receiving stream in North Caroline`s 303 (1 haE'
which contains impaired streams in the State (lie, Little Creek is only part(ally supporting its intended
uses), and 2) future expansions above 1.5 MGD will result in an inelream waste concentration (IWC)I.
greater than 33%, an Environmental Analysis (EA) will be required as part of the NPDES permit.
1 other.
a>
n is Analysis of al
u. application process for this discharge site. The EA should include an acoaom y B�t
I waste disposal alternatives and Include potential waste disposal requirements for the next 30 years } i
Should a discharge altemative at this location be the mast economically and environmentally feasible..= p.c
alternative, the following NPDES permit limitations are being recommended; '
Parameter Summrr Winter ) '
BODS (mpl) 5 10
N1(3•N (m&M 1 :3
no (mlyl) 6 6
Pew Collfonn (mgA) 200 200
TSS (mgA) 36 30
Tom[ Residual Chlorine(ugil) 17 17
Cadmium(ugn) 2.1 2.1
Chromium (ugA) 51 St
Copper(ugA) Monur Modwr
Nicke (ugA)i 90 90
Lead (ugA) 26 26
Van:(ugA) Monitor Monitor
Cyanide (ugA) Monitor Monitor
Silver (van) Monitor Monitor
Tout phosphorus (mgA) 0.05 0.05
PH (Sul) 6.9 , 6.9
Li FlPCr:rkbelow BarnesesPond .. The N.C. Division of Land Resources has informed NCDEM that Names Pend is not subject to
minimum release regulations, Therefore, in the absence of a minimum release flow this location is not
feasible for relocation of the subject discharge. Due to the existent conditions in the headwaters of the
pond, this office estimates that the flow from the pond during 7Q10 flow conditions will be negligible, if
any, Therefore, discharge at this site will not be allowed unless a minimum release flow is maintained at
the dam. However, as previously discussed in our May 8, 1992 letter, current information indicates the
presence of a second pond approximately 2.0 miles downstream from Barnes Pond., Therefore, even if a
minimum release from games Pond is achieved, the issues of eutmphication in this second pond and low
r-- flow conditions in the receiving stream will require wastewater treatment using state -of -the an
�I technologies to mitigate downstream impacts,
ri
Swift Cseek below Little Creek
According to the Nause River Basinwide. Management Plan prepared by NCDEM and scheduled for
approval by the Environmental Management Commission prior to April,1993, the lower portion of Swift
Creek has no additional assimilative capacity for oxygen-consuming'wastes as evidenced by a field
calibrated water quality model. Therefore, the plan recommends that no now discharges be allowed
unless it can be shown that no more environmentally sound alternatives are available. The long range
- strategy for the creek includes eventual removal of the existing discharges as alternatives become
available.
l.^
" b'd SNOIlHJ3d0 N611,t1�7 Wd92:E9 L6. Bti AON'

I I +
Mr. Robert Hyatt
Page 4
Exist ng discharges are being required to meet advanced tertiary treatment limits in order to protect water
quality standards. Also, the presence of an endangered species in lower Swift Creek makes this stream a
poor long range choice for wastewater assimilation.
Please note that the above. set of permit limitations are only preliminary and to be used only for
planning purposes. Final NPI)ES permit limitations can only be provided upon approval of an NPDFS
permit application,
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. 1= C, Mangles of my
staff at (919) '733-5083, ext. 515.
ICW]`rC
CC: Tin Donnelly
Bobby Blowo
Central Files
Si neer' y; VG ,�revorClements�Asst Chief
tar Quality Section
I
;,..i
S�IOIIC'J3d0NOlJ,CIJWC,
9E:E9 'L6:'BLtfAOM'. ei•,•,,.
f .
r

Date
114195
1113/95
1120/95
1/27/95
2/3195
2/9195
2/17195
G 2/23/95
2/27195
3/8/95
3l16/95
3/23/95
3/31/96
4/4/95
4/12/96
4120/95
4/26/96
5/4/95
5111195
5118/95
5/26/95
Cd ug/l Ni ug/I
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
e2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
c2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 e20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2 <20
<2
<20
e2
<20
<2
<20
<2
<20
6/1/95
<2
<20
6/9195
<2
420
6/15/95
<2
<20
6123195
<2
<20
6/29/95
<2
e20
6'd
CN95-97 AS
Town of Clayton, NC
Cd & Ni 95-97
Date
Cd ug/I
Ni ugll
Date
Cd ug/I
Ni ug/i
114/96
<2
<20
1/7/97
<2
<20
1112/95
<2
<20
1115197
<2
<20
1118196
<2
<20
1122l97
<2
420
1/23/96
e2
<20
1/29/97
<2
<20
216/96
<2
<20
216/97
<2
<10
2/16/96
<2
<20
2/11197
<2
<20
2122/96
<2
<20
2118197
<1
<50
2/27195
<2
<20
2/26197
<2
<20
3/6/96
<2
<20
314/97
<2
<20
3/15/96
<2
<20 I
3/13/97
<2
<20
3120196
<2
e20
3/20/97
<2
<20
3/27196
<2
<20
3/27/97
<1
<5
4/4/96
<2
<20
4/4197
<2
<20
4111195
<2
<20
4/10/97
<1
<5
4/19196
<2
<20
4/14/97
<2
<20
4126196
42
<20
4121/97
<2
<20
5/3196
<2
<20
5/1197
<2
<20
5/10196
<2
c20
6/5197
<2
<20
5117/96
<2
e20 l
5/16/97
<1
<5
5/20/96
<2
<20
5/18/97
<2
<20
5129/96
<2
<20
5/29197
<1
<5
613/98
<2
<20
6/6/97
<2
<20
6111/98
<2
<20
6110/97
<1
<5
5/21196
<10
<20
6/19197
<i
<5
6/28/96
<10
<20
I
ENOIly�i3d0 NOU,y-ID 'WBGE:EO LB. BT AON

4
_
SL000E WY1NG
PrDs
-
UiSCHARGE TO PT
CONINACLUR FUR
Wow
PRIIWRY CLARIFIER
-
PUMP STAIIUN
TTN]U.WG FILTER
IIRLENT PUMP
1'—^--_—�--
STADGN
TRLCKUVG FILTER PUdIT
!
I
L____—_.---__—J�_
R SCREEN REN
GRIF
AEPATLCN BASIN
AFSIATIGIL BASINNFTJ ENf
PUMPING
STADUG AERATION BASIN
1 0WISiGN box
.. ... ..
.... �..
O
..SLUDGE -
-
U]
LOADING 36 NG
PUMP
SLtLU
SDGE
HOLDING
61
TANK
CDRUM.T ILDG-
..
Ik SLUUCEI P
AWNEDC
P�WIA
to -
FLDR
3
METQt
n
r
E<
RFo
7
FFFLURNR
T
IMIDJPULU[
SFAJ(
UJGE RLILS
r[�
GI LVURQi�..�.-
SPLRTER
BOX
CLARIFIER
RETURN
SLUDGE
PUMPING
STATIOR
UV
7
S URDNC
BE7)S
N
d
OPERATION AND CONTROL OF TREATMENT PROCESS
TOWN OF CLAYTON
- - LITTLE CREEK }iECLAMA noN FACILITY - - - -

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. R. Steven Biggs
Town Manager
P.O. Box 879
Clayton, North Carolina 27520
Dear Mr. Biggs:
AY
�
���'
._►��_
D E N R
November 14,1997
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
NPDES Permit No. NCO025453
Clayton WWTP
Johnston County
The Division has received your request for a modification of the subject permit. After a review by NPDES
personnel, the Division has no objection to this modification. This permit modification removes the monitoring
requirements for Nickel and Cadmium.
Please find enclosed the revised Effluent Limitations pages for outfall 001. These pages should be inserted
into your permit. The old pages may then be discarded. Note that the A(2) pages only have been changed, as
this change in monitoring pertains to the relocated outfall which discharges directly to the Neuse River. All
other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit
modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency:
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit modification are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions concerning these permit modifications, please contact Charles Weaver at
telephone number [phone], extension 511.
cc. Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Compliance Enforcement Unit
NPDES Unit i
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Sincerely,,
reston Howard` ; Jr., .
t6�
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
Charles_Weaver ® dem.ehnr.state.nc.us

A.(2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - SUMMER (April 1- October 31) Permit No. NCO025453
During the period beginning after relocation of the outfall and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001 to the
Neuse River. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
9
Weekly
Average
g
Daily
IVlaximurt�
Measurement
Frequency
q Y
Sample,
Type
Yp
Sample
Location 1
Flow
1.9 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD, 5 day, 20°C2
10.0 mg/I
15.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
E,
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mg/i
Daily
Composite
E, I
NH3 as N
4.0 mg/l
Daily
Composite
E
Dissolved 0R9en3
Daily
Grab
E, U, D1
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 A 00 ml
400 /100 ml
Daily
Grab
E U D1
Total Residual Chlorine
28.0 /i
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E U D1
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
2.0 m /i
Weekly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity4
Quarterly
Composite
E
Conductivity
1
Grab
U D1
Chromium
2 / Month
Composite
E
Lead
2 / Month
Composite
E
Copper
2 / Month
Composite
E
Silver
2 / Month
Composite
E
Zinc
2 / Month
Composite
E
Footnotes:
1 Sample locations: E - Effluent; I - Influent; U - Upstream; D - Downstream; frequencies for upstream and downstream monitoring are listed in Part I,
Section A(2a).
2 The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue'concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3 The daily dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l.
4 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 1.6%; March, June, September & December (see Part III, Condition I.).
5 Compliance shall be based upon a quarterly average of weekly samples.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent,
upstream and downstream by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

A.(2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - WINTER (November 1 - March 31) Permit No. NCO025453
During the period beginning after relocation of the outfall and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001 to the
Neuse River. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Locationl
Flow
1.9 MGD
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD 5 day, 20°C2
20.0 mg/i
30.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
E, I
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mg/i
45.0 mg/I
Daily
Composite
E, I
NH3 as N
8.0 mg/i
Daily
Composite
E
Dissolved OxygeO
Daily
Grab
E, U, D1
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 /100 ml
400 /100 ml
Daily
Grab
E U Di
Total Residual Chlorine
28.0 /l
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E U 131
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
2.0 m /I
WeeklyComposite
E
Chronic Toxici
Quarterly
Composite
E
Conductivity
I
Grab
U, D1
Chromium
2 / Month
Composite
E
Lead
2 / Month
Composite
E
Copper
2 / Month
Composite
E
Silver
2 / Month
Composite
E
Zinc
2 / Month
Composite
E
Footnotes:
1 Sample locations: E - Effluent; I - Influent; U - Upstream; D - Downstream; frequencies for upstream and downstream monitoring are listed in Part I,
Section A(2a).
2 The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
3 The daily dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l.
4 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 1.6%; March, June, September & December (see Part III, Condition I.).
5 Compliance shall be based upon a quarterly average of weekly samples.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent,
upstream and downstream by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

-1.5IM I• M M
NC0025453 Town of Clayton WWTP 03-04-02
Request for renewal and modification. Neuse River Basin
11/3 Received unsigned application, $300. Charles thought it was just a modification and removed
monitoring requirements for Nickel and Cadmium, 11/14/97.
11/17 Called Town Manager, Steven Biggs, 553-5866, per Bob Sledge's request. The facility would
like to resubmit their plans through CG to include Nitrogen removal. They plan to go to bid 11/:
11/18 Talked with the ORC, James Warren, 553-1536. Per their 201 plan, they think they have to
meet a BOD limit of 5 mg/1 by 6/1/98. The facility received a spec letter 11/3/90 with this limit
in it, but nothing is in the permit about it. Current limit = 10 mg/l.
Tried calling CG to find out what is in the 201 plan.
Received fax from James Warren. Speculative limits letter, Cd and Nickel info, and
application.
11/21 Cecil Madden called. He says the facility went to bid on the proposed construction of tertiary
filters and UV disinfection. He mentioned that the 201 plan was part of a negotiation between
the Town and Steve Tedder, and in it they would not get Nitrogen limits upon their relocation
to the Neuse River.
11/25 Called Steven Biggs to request a signed copy of the application. Left a message.
11/26 Received letter from James Warren. He is requesting future permit limits in writing.
12/1 James Warren dropped off the signed application.
12/16 Wrote ack letter, requested SR.
CF Notes:
IWS (Industrial Waste Survey) due to pretreatment March 1, 1998.
Compliance and Pretreatment Inspection 6/11/97, facility is in compliance.
Clayton joined LNBA 8/6/96. Instream monitoring is provisionally waived as long as they
are a member of the association. (Added this statement to effluent limits page.)
WLA Juan Mangles 7/93
Advanced tertiary treatment limits and comprehensive instream monitoring effective upon
expansion above 1.9 or renewal whichever comes first.
Modelers did spec limits and RP. BOD, NH3, DO, and TRC are WQlimited
Receiving Stream: Neuse River WS-IV NSW CA Index #: 27-41.3 8/3/92
From a point 0.1 mile downstream of mouth of Poplar Creek to City of Smithfield
water supply intake
Compliance data: No violations
No tox fails in '97, 1 fail in '96, 6 fails in '95, 3 fails in '94
Reasonable Potential showed a limit for Silver, but 0.06 µg/l is an action level and a limit
would only be given if Silver is shown to be the cause of toxicity. Left monitoring in
for Silver and Copper. Took monitoring out for Chromium, Lead, and Zinc. Facility
still monitors for these in their pretreatment program.

NC0025453 Town of Clayton WWTP 03-04-02
Permit expires May 31, 1998.
DMRs - High values for Chromium = 190, Copper = 150, and Zinc =200 in July '97. ORC
says it was probably a slug from an SILT or lab error. He doesn't know which, but it
has not come up again.
No instream data; facility is an LBNA member.
12/30 Bryan Blake, McKim & Creed Engineers, 233-8091, called. We talked about construction.
1/9/98 Talked with Cecil Madden.
CG is allowed to fund for what is in 201 plan. The facility needs to revise their 201 plan with
an engineering amendment (give reason why), then resubmit plans & specs.
Danny Smith, RRO, doesn't have a problem with the BOD limits at 10/20, if the stream can
handle it. He will talk with Judy Garrett about it. Will send him the WLA. We will go on a
site visit the week of the 19th.
Talked with Bryan Blake. He is working on a proposal to the Town about what they should do
now. He will keep me informed. I let him know that the Division would work with the town
on what would be most cost effective: to build now or wait till plans & specs authorized for
Nitrogen removal. The Town must award the contract for the ATC for UV and 2 traveling
bridge tertiary filters that they have now by Jan. 20 or they will lose the funding.
1/21 Site visit with Danny Smith. The facility has a 30 day extension on prices for construction; they
have not awarded the contract yet.
Let compliance know that the facility is at 1.9. Called Bryan Blake to have him send a 1.9 eng
cert. Received eng cert letters fax from consultant.
4/17 Called ORC, James Warren. Construction is underway for UV and 2 traveling bridge tertiary
filters. The facility is removing C12 contact tank, and modifying SO2 tank into a C12 tank for
algae control. Modified supp to cover page.
Will put in an implementation schedule to meet the BOD and NH3 limits so that they can finish
construction; effective 4/1/99.
Drafting permit:
Changed BOD to 5/10 and NH3 to 2/4 with a 4/99 implementation schedule.
Took out monitoring for chromium, zinc, and lead per RP.
Added TN total annual load of 214501b/yr, TN footnote, TN special conditions and
optimization report requirement per Neuse strategy.
Updated supp to cover page to reflect construction and higher flow.
Removed 1.5 limits pages. Added 1.9 MGD limits page for after 4/l/99.
Wrote draft cover letter.
4/20 To DAG for review.
Public Notice: 4/22/98 Schedule to Issue: 6/8/98

NCO025453
Town of Clayton WWTP
Neuse River WS-V NSW CA
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7010 (CFS)
186
7Q10 (CFS)
186
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
1.9
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
1.9
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
2.945
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
2.945
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVE
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVI
0.22
IWC (%)
1.56
IWC (%)
1.56
Allowable Concentration (
1090.68
Allowable Concentration
50.26
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
186
Fecal Limit
2W/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
1.9
Ratio of 63.21
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
2.945
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVI
0.22
IWC (%)
2
Allowable Concentration
101.59
F 1': �+ t� l�
V 00
V O %a
�'O.aHNw1
IF
r.4 C
Y
O
oN �NN N �pp p. ft
~ Q M m O F O~O O l~^I. M~ ,0.•• T A F O0
Li
r
IL
•
�O s ��pp en+ lh� ^ hrh L �.
A O� S
( M A V a Q g r p > u�
X.a.
a O. P q
T M
<'ZO�. �y��ZO<v�O.LC
�1
w q 7 u ii O u A'g a Q -.
ts.
5

CLAITON M' AND INDUS2Ry SAAPLINO SI Mail DATA Fi
Noul ll a'<'pacl I al ial all - �I- SNi"N" out OP Ni aNIcal0ig is 111 dneclim.
8SA94 a I.I10"lil
IOU SdtNp
Dale (..go)
Im)
IOa. Oul
Afal
6,8.75
IN 92.7
Ju096
7-7.3
110.7
30096
1
113.0
A.i
pNXNXM
I11 0
S,96
6.5-73
113.0
wSO
1
124.0
NO9N
7.1.96
135_0
Dcc-96
6.1.1E
113.0
Jul
1
148.0.0
Fibi
74.6
119.3
ma l
6.9-7.5
I26_c
AF-97
68-7.5
IMf
bfay-91
6.84.6
175.1
J.97
6.8-7.6
159t
Jul97
6.74.E
139.<
Au8.97
64-7.5
157.1
Hcp97
6543
I61i
On.97
6,87.5
1421
N9r97
6.8-7.3
Ill
Dcu97
1
141.E
A..,
135:
MIa
175.4
68n
92_
5= L 11. PH F alEq,
Dul
(no) Im)
Pill No
mil
LAW 7.1-7.7
2E00
1.96
1.377 7.419
22.00
1.196
1399 7.4-7.7
LJO
Aug96
0.863 7.64.9
'<3
SI 96
1.071 7.14.9
100
W96
1 6.94
<IO
N.96
OS55 7A I;
<10
MI-96
I.ON 7.1-1.8
12.00
Ja097
1172 7.3-7.9
1900
FNF91
LI00 734
19.OD
Muni
1.130 11
12.00
ANI
L108 7.48
25N
O1
1,141 7.34.9
11 GO
Jum97
1.129 7.1.7.6
21
Jul 9)
1.166 6.0-0.5
24.No
Aug97
0.931 6.ill
2t.00
satm
0.931 7.0-7.5
1660
O -97
0.791 7.2-7.6
17.20
Nov 97
0.802 71.7.5
1310
Deo97
O.N2 124.6
1230
J.98
1,272 7.34.9
111
Avenge
1.065
18.1E
lift.
1.399
27 Ou
Mon
10,773
7SO
PFA40i PA7'9S: 02
Pea.
Paul A9uaee -
PlnnenlAvmSe
Mnll Nemo..I Nall N.
p
n E
ul
fil
frool
1.41(own)
m n
fu N
t o
A)
fin
allot
(..a)
1 nl
1 1
I n
(u n
n
lu )
lu .A
319.5
17.4
395.9
17.5
4.
411,1
1.3
< 0.5
A1.
I sad,
.
3.5
< D.1
< 0.
1.
189.0
81.
< 5.<
2.5
3N.0
195
II.
0.1
48.
l.5
4.
0.1
< 1.
0.5
H8.
td.
IR
< 25
9.
SIJ.
142
1.
249.
35
2.5
c 0.1
)2.
5.
2.5
< O.1
c 10.
< 1.
lil,
3.3
< 5.<
25
I80.
Id.
ISJ
J.
1.5
c 0.
lE.
5.
2.5
OI
< 10.
I.
13.
1L2
< 5.
.
5
1.
< I.
2.
S
OS
< S.
3.
11.
< 25.
25
< 5 .0
2505
II
la
1.<
.
2.5
< 1.
31.
5.
10.
OSI
< 10.
1.
90.
l0.
5.
2.
238.
19.5
R.
4.
2.
1.
10-
5.
10.
0.
10.
< 1.
76.
66.
5.
1.
1J4.5
I47
27.5
4.3
47
2.
5.
36.
3.
< 50.
< 01
< 25.
2.
130.
15.
< 25.
< 1.
1]l
16.
1J.
53
1.
0.
56.
5.
25
0.2
< 25
c 3.
110.
< 25.
< 25.
34
293.
167 I
OR
6.1 [
770. M<
2.
0.5
4).
5.
3.
4.
E 5
< E.
210.
25.00<
25M
I.
19.8C
.10
561
307.
9.
Jul193U
.0
33
fl9
11..0E
301096
5.15
.10
2.0
< 1.
61.
i.
9.
03
c 2,04
3N
Mi
Jul5.0K
E.I
4753
17.61
64]
32CO
1845
27.35
6.71
221.1
203
38.II
5.
2294
111
26.
6.0
193A
_ �_ 5
_)5.1
_ 6�_
_____
______
________
c Sx3
____l
< ----
-____
< 0111
_______
< 2.6
<_____
LS
1N.t
c ]8.5
c __ __
103
a 2.
__ ._
9.0
1911
507.0
163
20.3
31.8
46,1
54
1L
WI
770.
17
SIN
< 1.
5.
56.0
< 5.0
< Sao
4.14
< 23.0
< 2.54
NOOK
81JU
250K
SIX
9.
174.0
11.5
iSA
3.
249.
25
< 07
< 1.
1.10
< 2.5
a 0.11
< 101
< 0,51
14.6
.: 2.5(
1.2
< IN
9.
p50
HlG-
nl 1 41
I n
n(
n
n
1 1
f 1
I n=1
I J I
)
1 I
lu
u)
1 nl
1
5.5
O2
1.
L
1.
< 5.
5.
I0.
10
46.
5.
.] 0E
O.l
L
5.
< 5.
5.
10.
10.
SO,
< 5,
2.5
4
03
O1
5.
< S.
5.
< 10.
10
.J 5.1
0.2
IR
0.]
4
< 1S
c 3.
25.
5.
< 25,
< 0.1
< 10.
0.
69.
l6.
5.
IS
< 2.
6.
01
lit
01
<I
< 2.5
< E
11.
5,
< II.
0.1
< 10.
1.
4l.
2l.Ol
< 5.
05
5.1
O.l
4.5
0.
2.
1.
11.
3.
10.
0.1
< 10
I.
4T
2.S.
25
10.
0.3
< 10.
1.
68.
35.
< 5.
5.
10.0
25
< 100
2.5
<
{. 6.0 L
OB G
9.6 R
1.11
54.0 1
< 3.5 I
< 1. ■i
< 11
5.
< 1
50
< R.5
,
2,144
C
< 0.2
< 10.
2.1
55.
< 11.
< 25.
I.
I. B.IU
LIR
5.8
I1
SL
< 1.11
< 10.11
< IOOC
< H.DD
< 011
< 14.
5.
92.
14.
< 30.
I. 600
DW
4.16
1.7E
SII
< 1.10
< 1041
1914
< SiU
< 020
< 1O.
5.
83.
71,
< SO.
< 2.
1. l01
1.1
1001
23
S.00
< 100
59.00
65.IXI
5.00
< 2.N
SOD
< 5.
128.
IIO.
50
5.
171 30
1.21
10.25
1.7
2.OG
< 10.00
< IOOu
a loot
< 200
01.0
99.
IO0
53 311
1.5E
7l9
1.5
200
< a
< 1000
< 100U
< 21
Si1U,
IS 191
07
1.9
1.3
5.
< 2
10.0
< 2.0
< too
< i
< SIN
SIN
72.
< 50.
10.
0.
$9 5.5
18
21
< 2.
< 10.
< 10.
120
< Mo
ION
10.
5.2 i.0
1.3
4 7
1.2
10,
1 10.
100
700
c 10.
7A 7b
LI
3.6
03
a 2.
Jul
10.
< 20C
< b1.
47.5
10.
5.
____
_
____
____
51.0
tl l.4
______
it
_ __._.
b 11.
p 9.81
p 13.9
__._
03
_ ________
131
7� 2.
]0.6
_ .___
b 46.6
_
v U.5
E.61
b 3.
651 53
0]
SI
13
5.
6 59.
N 65.
X 50.
N 2.
X 25.
5.
128.
N 110.
N
1.
9. 8.
3. 2-91
LS
0.2
IE.2
11
2.9
0.J
».
».
X 5.
tl 3.
1.
p 5.
N 2.
X 2.5
0.1
X 5.
0.91
43.
x ES
5.
N D.
N _
0
;men
.]
n
19
531
n
16.
]136
(nl nl
]SI
A
Inn
6
1 n
521.01
51
liltn
2.>
I AI
c L
n n
<
a5
n n
.4
<<
981
O n)
a
119
II nl
011
01
IIn
8
Ill
n AI
1..1.
1
0 41
1087
D1109
019.
380.4
41
I of
a 10LS1
1 nl
<< ixbill
1� 41
91.
5
9.n
at.1
I7J1
W➢I
MM
If
61
Y1I5.
Ad
OI9.W11
W
41L0
eEAO
15
77L6
t6Y6
N.M
Po.00
11020all
VAR 'I 1 10".1111)
POINT SOURCE BRANCI
PI.9u.J 01. JdA, Ci f
[IayIMH.WrvaMa A'i.yJl Pqa l Mina
SnpYp Svnmxy

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
N�r
F N' Name
Tom of Clayton
Paidabr.
Sllvar
Acion LW
Paameter.
Chromium
_ Parsmeler= Ca r
S.d,A= ]
n BDL=12DL
1 5
2 5
Ambn Level
k paam&er.
NPDESa
N00025453
Sf9Mad=
0.06
go
I Donl falling to
check w6h Prelrll
Sbrdad= soP its
_ _
_ n BDL=I/2DL Adual Data RESULTS
1' 5 <10 Sid Dev.
2 1 2 Mean
a:. I <2'C.V.
5'5 <10
G <10 MdlF for=
]'; 5' <10 Max. Value
61 1 <2 Max. PM Qa
91 4Movable CW
go+�':
SIarHeA=
Ow OD
1.9
]ofoa de
186
n
SDLLd2DL
Amual Dale
Adual De
RESULTS
_ a
L80
1
5
<10
12.1825nn
1.]99
3.933
c10
Sid DW1
RecVM Slream
Neuse River
2
1
!2
9.W9686211
<10
Moen
8.438
2
Stream Lbas
W NSWCA
3
1
<2
1.300223595
OA6>
3 _5
5 t9
c10
C.V.
1.1]5
3
ISNAL RESULTS
5
5
d0_
A
19
5
SWer
LIMIT
6
5
5
.
PM.__
_I
].a
51i9/I
� 3]pgll
3125
6
]
8
9
16
16
MuM Faclor=
38
_6
]
Max. PredCw
190
T
2.5
<5
50pg4
190,
20
150
Mac Value
5]"I„'
Mawable Cw
3.8
8
5
<10
5
<tO
Mmc Prod Cw
2188Pq
8
9
6
<10
w
3.0
Pg4
5
<10
AIoweNO CW
432.5'1
':::' 9
Chraium
OKI
10
2.6
<510
5 c10
5 <10
10
5
<10
l0
Max. Paid CW
3]
11
5
<1011
µa 11
57
57
11
Allawable Cw
3125.0
12
6
<10
Ulwar liftelaclation
of Mal. Facial
12
5
c10
Unear Interal.0 MF
12
5
<10
Unsig Interaol.d MF
12
13
2.5
<6
13
_
5
<tO
yj 13
5
<10
13
r
OKI
14
2.5
<6
C.V.
1.300223595
14
5
dO
C.V.
0.45T
-i 14
5
10
c.V.
1.175
14
Max. Prod Q
216.8
15
2.5
<5
C.V. b
1.3
15
1
4C.V,
b
OA
15
5
<10
C.V. 10
1.1
15
NlOwade Cw
QT5
16
25
<5e
C. V. N
1.4
16
5
190
C. V. hi
0.5
16
5
<10
C. V. h1
1.2
16
17
25
<50
MMI
I's
17
1
c2
MFN
1.3
17
5
<10
MW
1.4
1]
Yae
OKI
18
5
<tU
M%
1.6
18
1
<2
MPlo
1.3_
18
5
c10MFb
1.3
_
19
Mac PiedQ
340.o0
19
SO
6e
MF.
IS
19
5
<10
MF=
1.3
19
11
11
MF.
1.4
_ 19
Nlowabla Cw
3125.0
20
25
<50
20
5
<10
20
5
c10
20
21
5
.10
21
5
<10
_ _ 21
22
17
17
21
LaMO
OKI
22
25
ew
22
5
<10
_
5
<10
22
Max. Paid Cw
190
23
5
ct0
23
5
<10
23
-- 24
5
<10
23
Allowable Cw
1562.5
24
24
5
<10
5
5
5
<101
<10
<10
24
25
26
25
25
5
<10
_-
25
OK 128
26
5
<10
26
27
75
2]
27
5
<10
5
<10
27
31
26
28
5
.10
a
5
<10
28
29
29
5
.10
- 29
5
.10
-- -29
Leed
30
30
5
<10
_ ,30
31
5
<10
30
w
6.1
31
31
_
5
.10
31
1 Cw
1562.5
32
32
32
5
<10
32
33
33
- S3
33
Naaa
OKI
34
34
-_ 34
34
Maa.Pmd Ca
_ -�_
35
35
in 35
M.N. Cw
31250
98
36
36
36
37
37
_
37
3]
SWer
MONDOR
38
38
38
SO
Max. Pr
69.7
39
39
39
39
Movable Cw
3.8
40
40
_
40
µ
41
41
41
42
4t
Menu
OKI
42
42
q2
Mina. Paid Cx"-
0.11
43
q3
Nbwable
µ
_
q5
45
_ µ
46
45
ADIVNI
µ
48
46
Mex. Prod Cw
4DIV/0!
4l
4T
_
_ 4]
4]
Nbwable Cw
'
i-- BVALUEI.
49P
49
48
49
40
a9
Fii 48
�'" qs
so
60
60
ax. Pred
-4DIV/01
-0.0
511
51
_
51
51
_. 52
52
52
S2
-
53
53
53
53
S4
51
54
- s4
55
55
55
55
56
Sfi
56
56
5
5]
6]
5
58
68
58
59
SS
59
S9
59
66
60
66
69
61
61
61
61
62
62
62
82
64
651
65
85
fi5
PAGE1

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
NOT
EMEMPMad
fir: mr-,�
-_•�7.©��I��.�����
��
�
N17NO WE 1

TOXICANT ANALYSIS
WE1137.,
�-�-
lo
1.3
37
-41
-42
47
41748 PA 2

SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Town of Clayton
is hereby authorized to:sistin
i.9
1. Continue to operate a 1yMGD wastewater treatment facility oxidation ditch of a barlarifier and
chamber, trickling filter, riestiea basin,
` including post disinfection located at Clayton WWTP, on Durham Street Extension, Clayton,
Johnston County (See Part III of this Permit), and
x
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Little
Creek which is classified a Class C NSW waters in the Neuse River Basin, and
3. f receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division of Environmental
nagement, upgrade the treatment system to 1.9 MGD and relocate to discharge to the
Ne se River, and�d(\
4. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into the
Neuse River which is classified a Class WS-V NSW waters in the Neuse River Basin.
Y

A. (2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL (Summer: April 1- October 31) Permit No. NCO025453
During the period beginning after relocation to the Neuse River and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001 into the Neuse River. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5-Day, 20°C "*
Total Suspended Residue **
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen ***
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic . Toxicity****
Conductivity
C win
�
��
Copper �r
Silver%
Discharge Limitations
Weekly, Avg.
1.9
MGD
10.0
mg/I 15.0 mg/I
30.0
mg/I 45.0 mg/I
4.0
mg/I
200.0 /100 ml 400.0 /100 ml
2.0 mg/I (+)
28.0 µg/I
Monitoring
Requirements
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
*,5amRle
Continuous
Iyae
Recording
Location
I or E
Daily
Composite
E, I
Daily
Composite
E, I
Daily
Composite
E
Daily
Grab
E, U, D *
Daily
Grab
E, U, D *
Daily
Grab
E
Daily
Grab
E, U, D *
Quarterly
Composite
E
Weekly
Composite
E
Quarterly
Composite
E
*
Grab
U, D
---E --
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream, D - Downstream; Frequencies for upstream and downstream monitoring are listed in Part I,
Section A (2a).
**The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
***The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentrations shall not be less than 6.0 mg/I.
c�
****Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 1.6%; March, June, September and December: SEE Part III, Condition I.
(+) Compliance shall be based upon a quarterly average of weekly samples.
c�
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent, upstream nad C
downstream by grab sample. t
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. �

A. (2). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL (Winter; November 1-March 31) Permit No. NC0025453
During the period beginning after relocation to the Neuse River and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from
outfall(s) serial number 001 into the Neuse River. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Flow
BOD, 5-Day, 200C **
Total Suspended Residue **
NH3 as N
Dissolved Oxygen
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
Total Residual Chlorine
Temperature
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Chronic Toxicity****
Conductivity
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Lead
Copper
Silver
Zinc
� - is t= t� •
Monthly Avg. Weekly. Avg.
1.9 MGD
20.0 mg/[%, 30.0 mg/I
30.0 mg/I 45.0 mg/I
8.0 mg
200.0 /14 Ertl 400.0 /100 ml
2.0 mg/I (+)
Monitoring
RMIrgments
Measurement
Daily
Sample
'$Amy
Max. Frequency
Continuous
TyRe
Recording
Location
I or E
Daily
Composite
E, I
Daily
Composite
E, I
Daily
Composite
E
Daily
Grab
E, U, D *
Daily
Grab
E, U, D *
28.0 µg/I Daily
Grab
E
Daily
Grab
E, U, D *
Quarterly
Composite
E
Weekly
Composite
E
Quarterly
Composite
E
'
Grab
U, D
4.0 µg/I Weekly
Composite
E
51.0 µg/I Weekly
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
2 / Month
Composite
E
* Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream, D - Downstream; Frequencies for upstream and downstream monitoring are listed in Part I,
Section A (2a).
'*The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (85% removal).
'**The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentrations shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l.
****Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 1.6%; March, June, September and December: SEE Part III, Condition I.
(+) Compliance shall be based upon a quarterly average of weekly samples.
The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored daily at the effluent, upstream and
downstream by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Part I,
NCO025453
SECTION A (2a); Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements Final (Continued...)
During the period after the relocation to the Neuse River and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from outfall serial number 001 into Little Creek. Such discharge shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below: 7---
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ; NEUSE RIVER DISCHARGE LOCATION
Instream Monitoring
Parameters
Upstream
Downstream 1
Downstream 2
DO
3/Week
3/Week
3/Week
Temperature
3/Week
3/Week
3/Week
Conductivity
3/Week
3/Week
3/Week
pH
3/Week
3/Week
3/Week
Fecal Coliform
3/Week
3/Week
3/Week
Upstream Location: at NCSR 1700
Downstream Locations:
Site 1: at NC 42
Site 2: at NCSR 1908
Instream Monitoring is to be sampled 3/ week during June, July, August and September, and
weekly in all the other months.
On df -F

Permit No. NC0025453
F. Nutrient Condition for Permits with Phosphorus Limits
This permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued to change 'the effluent limitation on
nutrients for this discharge depending upon the following:
1. The findings of a study by the Division of -Environmental Management determine nutrient
control is necessary.
2. Local actions do not successfully reduce the nutrient loading on the receiving waters.
3. The onset of problem conditions in the receiving waters.
G. Disposal Alternatives
The Permittee shall continually evaluate all wastewater Jspos alternatives and pursue the most
environmentally sound alternative of the reasonably cost eft five alternatives. If the facility is
in substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditio ,of the NPDES permit or governing
rules, regulations, or laws, the Permittee shall submit a re ort in such form and detail as required
by the Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan o action within sixty (60) days of nUVJ
notification by the Division. I `- N"�o
b\d
H. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina
Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to
establish compliance with the permit condition. The first- test will be performed after thirty days
from the effective date of this permit during the months of March, June, September and
December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final
effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following
address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC. 27607

Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to
submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
I. CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LICAIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina
Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is 1.6% (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure
document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to
establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days
from the effective date of this permit during the months of March, June, September and
December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final
effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for. the month in which it was performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1(original) is to be sent to the following
address:
Attention:
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine
is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.

c
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this
permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to
submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.

6. NPDES NWNCOO�m16. The JohnstonCoumv Beardof COmmiSsioner5, Post Office Box 1D46. Smiinfi,c 1,Z7-577 nos Cooled to-o permit rener:d
nBoianC'WN inme NauseliveKLsircnli¢Ia.JOnn510n CCJL1..7ne foaill.':L^treaty, cryknrg¢c(,jN,G.JC'1leCt[COCTQSII: ono mpUilrlCl ,.as
Pd1ro ktr. streamOv.4abl Nd_al a:acity of
the
isadiOne rep wing water
L9g De,
sumeSODi. OmmOnie.two1 lee CU01 CmGrmc. 1010, on0sa,l cC_[
.0tershed. the Oyoilo0le IpOd COPoCiIY Of the Immediate r¢C[IYinP Wafer N'iII oe COosUTQtl. Tnls trite effect v. clef 11u01171' o05e0 effluent IlmfollOC
watershed.
7. NpDcS No. NCOOS332. Carol) he While- ^: ice Inc of N.C. Past Off, ce Box 240705 Chorlotte, NC26254 roe appliedtar o Permit renewal for cfa_il
spurn o' KnlonficaIE WoKe COJrh Ire tcci.'. wschmges0.12i MGD Of treated Domestic Wosle.ater from one OJlfal l Into Poplar Creek, 0 Class C'N5
how of C.7 vs. The fact rty 1, oermi netl Ic Ir.^ease -1011 1000;in'10 0.250 MGD. BOD, ammonia total residual chlorine ana Olssolvea oxygen are one,
loco ca..:,nv at me immeC0le recelvin-> Ir9er will be consumed. This may oftecl future water gaa1171Dosed effluent Im itoti0m for aadiilDno
8. NPDES No. NC0063746. Inc D: Lee one A•_sciates_PO Box 764. Wake Forest, NC 27567 has applied for a permit mr-,l
5. NPDES No. NC0a45608. Word Tronsform-e- Company, PO Be. 30009. Raleigh, NC 21612 has O.Plied fora permit renewal for 0 fact
The foci l ilv oischarge50.054 V &D of treoteG idCusiriel WOslewoler from one oulfall Cam On unnamed tributary 70 Little Brier Creek, a
Cis and a 30O$ flow of 0 eft. No Poremete-c are water quality limited, but In IS d15CnOrge may affect future OIIOCalion- r„6
10. NPDES No. NCW62279. Carol ino Wale r Service, Inc. of N.C., Post Office Box 24075 Chorl otte, NC 28224 has CDOled for a permit re
2502, Southwest of Shoiwell, Wake Co mO . ins faC: l if Y current ly d ischorge50,070 MIGD 0: I reed Cori is vast er,mer from One DO
the Neuse River Basin within nose7010fc,rlt-rfs ondo31)m flnwnfn nGrlc Thn ar,Im Cann_______ ____________
may
for
Permit
Iles, Ir,Corporciled 2117 Averette Rood Wake Forest, NC 27587 has vCalled for a Permit renewal for a
KrFnlcale, NC in Wake County. The foci l ity drschoroes 0.0575 MGD of treated tlomestic wasiewc er fI
xvl e' cuoirl based effluent limitations an ofor additigen onal dier schargers withinality Ithl thisor [se Po tion Of me aronithe
ss Cc'-O'Wion, I Hess Plan. Woodbridge. NJ 07095 has applied for a permit renewal in, a fnrilily in,
lerened. W64"t,
on NCSR 16:16, northwest Of Raleigh, Woke County,
I In the Neuse River Basin which nos 7010 flow of 0
Wake. veaze Co,%Al. Auburn Sheriff's Training Center, PO Box 550, Raleigh, NC 27602 has applied for o permit i
4, most a' AUDDm, Wake County. The facility aiscnorge5 0.0024 MGD Of treated tlomestic wastewoler from one Outten
er Basin which has a 7010 flow: of 0 cis and a 30..7 flow of 0.02 ds. SODS, ommonio and tlissDlvetl oxygen is water quo
living water will be consumed. This me, dhPrt fupir. water i-u- nr..n .as.n.n L,,.,,_v__, 1_, - I
20. NPDES No, 14 0080579. Lompe and MOiphrm Lumber Comcem. formerly Guy E.-Les, Lumber Co., PO Box 150. Smithfield NC27577 has pooped for o permit renewol for o facility located at 210 North
Tenth Street. Smithfield. Johnston County. Tne facility tlischorges IndJSl"C, vWoslevaler from wet decking facilities through two oulfpfis into an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek, a Class C•NSW stream
in the Neum River Basin. No parameters are Water quality hmitea, but this discharge may affect future allocations. /' , j,0
_... C.I.. ._
I.
R NPDES No. ounty, The
n'.: Thomas Tilley, Poole Road, Raleigh. om ,tic has applied for a permit renewal for a use Riv locatetl at Riverview am Ile Home Park River
NCSR 1007 (Poole Road), east of
from awake County. TNo Parimdischargesater MGDof limited Domestic dischargeOne oxinfalmayinto the Neuse River,aClass C•NSWstream in theNeuse River Spain Which has orequlafetlflow
taut Foils Lak¢ Dam. No paromller, are valet quality limited. but this tlischarge m0Y affect future al10c01iom. r((f h-f.r ✓f.
23. NPDES No. NCDMU53. The Tovm of Clayton. PO Box 879, Clovtan, NC 27520 has applied for 0 Permit renewal for a facility located M Clayton W W7P, on Durham Street Exfertion, Clayton, Johlnton
County. The fOC ittry discharges 1.9 MGDof treated domestic and industrial wastewater Iron one outfall into the Neuse River, a Class WS-I V NSW CA stream in the Neuse River Basin which has a 7010 flow of
186 Cis. SODS, ommonio, dissolved Oxygen, and total residual chlorine are water quality limited. For some Parameters, the ovoilable load Capacity of The immediate receiving water will be consumed. This
may affect future water punlily hmm� ,%h„eat li.nhnIt- 1,..
25. NPDES No. NCO036145. BP Oil
Selma, Johnston County. The tacit
the Neuse River Basin whit, hos I
r:ple• cacli7v based ehwen' it
21, NPDES Nc NCOOE2376. CI: :
ODL0nntu LD2 Eiscorges into on uno
affect future allocations. I
ulo rvo. rvc0056278. RiverMiil Floral ireri Association, PO Box 51726, Raleigh, NC 27609 has applied for a Permit renewal for a facility located on Falls of Neuse Rood. Raleigh, Wake County. The
facility d`. horge50.02 MGD of treated tlomeslic wastewater from one autfoll into the NeUnRyi�ver, Class C-NSW steam in the Neuse River Basin which has a regulated flow from the Foils lake dam. No
Parameters are water quality limited, but taus tlischarge mo)' affect future allocations. AA (- 1eYj-6 n(„
28. NPEDS No. NC0052311. William Energy Ventures, Inc., Past Office Be. 70, Tulsa, OK 74101-MM has applied for a permit renewal for a facility located of Selma Products Terminal, Highway 1M,
northv,esl m Selnlo, Jaheffan County. The facility is Perm pled to discharge stormwater and hydrostatic test water from one outfolI Into an unnamed tributary to the Neuse River, Clan WS-IV NSW stream In
the Neuse River Basin which has o 7010 floe of 0 cis and a 3002 flow of 0 cts. No Parameters are water quality limilea but this tlischarge may affect future allocations.
29. NPDES No. NC0007528. Town of Wake Forez6401 Elm Avenue, Woke Forest, NC 27587 has applied for a permit renewal fora facility locotetl of Woke Forest Water Treatment Facility, 1143 WOII Avenue,
Wake Forest. Wake Couniv. The faciliiv tlischorges filler backwash from One outsell into Smith Creek, a Class C-NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin. No parameters are water quality limited, but this
tlischarge may oNecf future ollocotions. ����.
30. NPDES No. NC0073318. fro D. Lee antl Assecimes, tno., PO Box 76:. Woke Foret. NC 27587 has applied 1^-o ce•mit renev:a'!a, a facility located at Whippoorwill Valley WaslewoterTrealment Plant,
=- .•'I:Ii II Rootl tNCSF.2Y:;, WaKe Forez:,s:oke Couny'. Tne lacililp currentolscharges 0. 050 MGD iwi In expansion o 0.200 MG D) of l reotea domestic wastewater from one autfoll into Smith Creek,a
:ass C-NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin vmich has a 7010 flaw of 015 cis. BCD, chimeric, antl tlissDlvetl oxygen ore water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load cact iv of the
Immeaime receiving water will De consumetl. This may afieat future water quality Dosed effluent limitations for additional dischargers wilnin this portion of the watershed. WZA4Ae-1%L'
l 31. NPDES No. NC0060771. Banniser ana Glover Properties, Intlian Creek Overlook, 1113 Indian Creek Trail, Garner. INC 27529 has 000lietl for o permit renewal for a facility located W Indian Creek
Overlook. NC Highway 5p, near Garner, Woke Counir. The lacilifr tlischorges 0.064 MGDof lreatetl domestic wastewoler, and is Permilled I" the tlischarge of uP fo 0.112 MGD, from one outfoll into Swill
Creek v Cross C. NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin which has o 7010 flow of 0.90 cis. BOD5, ommonio an dissolved oxygen are water qualify limited. For some parameters, the available load coaccite of
tee immetllate receiving water will pe consumed. This may afkat future water qualify based effluent limitations for additiawl dischargers within this oorlion of the wolefshed.Mtlp (s4{
32. NPDES No. NC0083346. Town al Smitmield, PO Bgz 761, Smithfield NC 27577 has applied for a Permit renewal for a facility located Ot Smithfield Water Treatment Plant on 2nd Streel, Smithfield,
Johmlon County. The facility tlischargez toter ackwash water from one oatfoll into Buffalo Creek, a Class C-NSW stream in the Neuse River Basin. NO Perometers are water quality limitetl, but this
tlis[harp! may pryer tuture allocations.
1 33. NPDES No. NC0032875. Pni hips Pipe Lin comPonv. 370 Adams Building, Bartlesville, OK 740U has applied for a Permit renewal for a facility located at Selma Terminal, on Highway 1003 and 1929,
north west of Selma, Jo his I ounty.Thefacilit� is Permitted to discharge stormwater and hydrostatic test water from two autfoll, into an unnamed tributary to Mill Creek.oClass WS-IVN Wstream in'
the Neuse River Basin which has a 7010 flow of 0 ats antl a 3002 flaw f 0 cis. No parameters are water quality limitetl, but this tlischarge may offect future peek, aiom.C� -I 3e. NPDES No. N 1 7J5. Johnston County, PO Box 2263, Smithfield, NC 275" has applied fore permit renewal for a facility located W the Johnston County Water Treatment Foci lily, 600 Clearwater Orive.
loc
Smitni,iC Johnston County. The fadSty discharges treatetl^ Ile-, -Wwash water from one omloll into Denali tributary to the Neuse River, o Cross W&IV NSW CA stream in the Neuse River Basin.
No parameters ore Winer quality linty di n ,s e. ,. _a _ ter ___ _ _

°�.°° 'O� -��J9 `DAVIT OF PUBLICATION
ok
�9
C, o/ iPr s ,O •,!'un/ Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said
t` ° O° °°, ��; �� '�by °� • . ty and State, duly commissioned and authorized to
6 l° •
r
o Q,- ;1P �s % • G��i�� • . - _ . �inister oaths, afffirmations, etc., personally appeared
��, • °i . • • • o° ' • • • • RobertM. Woronoff, Jr., who, being duly sworn or affirmed,
� ,0 90� a�� • • , 6�� ���r • - • according to law, doth depose and say that he is Treasurer of
xa oi . �°s s•: - THE NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHIl�tG COMPANY,
Cf �r ' • • a corporation organized and doing business under the Laws of
'0�• • . 'OAi,�� • - • • the State of North Carolina, and publishing a newspaper
• known as THE NEWS AND OBSERVER, in the City of
. • Raleigh, County an State aforesaid, the said newspaper in
• • 'Oo,,� • , : ' - . • •s8 which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
• l�s,� l./ was published was, at the time of each and every such
• - ' • ,! ?� publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and
•%?�� qualifications of Secion 1-597 of the General Statutes of
• �' N rth Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the
meaning of Section 1-597 of the .General Statutes of North
Carolina, and that as such he makes this affidavit; that he is
familiar with the books, files and business of said corporation
and by reference to the files of said publication the attached
advertisement for' NC DEPT OF EHNR was inserted in the
aforesaid newspaper on dates as follows: 04/18/98
e
Account Number: 73370150
The above is correctly copied from the books and files
aforesaid Corporation and publication.
Treasurer
0
Sworn or affirmed to, and subscribed before 'me, this
23 day of APRIL , A.D. 1998
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed my official seal, the day and year aforesaid.
1,�Avyv yvy�
..............�............ .......--......
Notan Public
My commission expires 2nd day of JULY , 2000.

Ctjt TON WWR AND LWLSMY SA LWG SIASIMY DATA F0IW1
Note: Va',' Woeuds a lnoQI.Ole laul9ly nponed was Oelow&tcdim aM Ne numnin 2pp4wg u In dnmim.
SSunPle F3owTIONn11
P (? b
Oale (mpd)
Irv)
Into, In
Map96
6.84.5
Na
J. 96
)-).5
1
Jul-%
674.4
1
Aug-96
WWNN
1
Sep.%
634.3
1
W-96
63-7.6
1
Nov-%
).1-] 6
1.
Nt.%
6.H-03
1
J.97
6.A7.4
i
FA97
7-0.6
1
Mac-W
6.9M.5
1
Apt-91
6.873
1
SW-92
6 &].6
1
Jung)
6.84.6
1
JW-97
6.]-).3
1
Aug-97
6.4-7.5
1
Sap92
6.8J.3
1
W-97
6.8-ts
1
Nov-W
6.&7.3
t
D4c-97
64.7
1
A,.,
Mo
On
a) u
gA
n)
N
(
u )
1
2]
318.5
15A
09
295.4
17.5
4.M
423.
23
c 0.5
M.
5.0
< 2.5
< 0.1
< 10.0
< 1.
184.
SLI
< 5.0
< 2.5
3.
296.
19.5
II.
< 10p 2Po
< 101 /a e
c 51
< 10,
10 �/ , ny
< 1 �q�/Ve a('�
1.
285.
14.
365
S.tl
249.
3.5
0.2
48.
3.5
1,
0.1
S.
31].
14.2
48
2.5
< OS
32.
5,
2.5
< 0.1
4.
280.0
14.
15.1
3.
2.
0.
32.
5.
2.5
0.2
5.
2%.
12.
N.
4.2
693.
5.
1.
< 1.
2.5
< 5.
0.5
3.
250.5
11.5
1
3.
2.
1.
33.
5.
O
0,2
8.
128.
14.5
R.
4.)
2.
1.
30.
5.
10.
0.
9.3
1795
14]
Y1.5
U
1>O.
2.5
< 5.
36.
5.
< 52.
< 0.1
6.
174.
16.
23.
5.5
25
< 0.
56.
5.
3.-9
0.
4.0
293.0
16.)
43,2
6.1
770,00
2,50
< O.M
43A
5.
2.51
4.
5.0
507.
1911
30.1
5.61
9.0
9.0
307.
159,6
19.71
14M
46.1
30.0
4.2
.1
2N<
I'm
62A
Ito
9.0
0.
73
473J
19.
6.4
1.2
334.
18.4
225
6.71
:.
221.1
203
38.1
5.
0.
239.4
16.1
26.
6.
3,5
1].5
35.1
6._
___
_ ---1.6
___
___.
_____ __.__ ___
153
_19J.1
39L3
_
163
31.
_
66
___
41.0
< --2.7
< 1,
< J5.5
c
< 9.1
< OA1
c'____
< 8.6 < 1. 1%J J8. IOA < y 9.0
'S.0
50),0
E0.3
46.1
11.0
]90.0
< 5.
5.
56.0
< 5.0
< 5O.
4.
25.0 < 2.5 210.0 BI.1 < 25. 5. 9.
12
1]4.0
11.5
15A
3.9
249.
2.5
< 0.E
< 1.
1.5
< 2.
Ol
< 1.0 < 0.3 14. 2.5 1.2 < 1. 9.
SP1PL, L(�.ATIONp,
PC�FJ1�1&
DaWWW
(nl8d) I.)
Pee.
(.Oj
1,U,96
LI01 7.3-7.)
3200
02
1.%
1327 14-).9
23200
1.1
Jul.%
L399 L4-].)
3to
SB
Aug-%
O.w ).6).9
Q
4.)
Bap%
1.0)1 )3-).9
200
5.0
(la-%
0]]3 694
<10
3.0
Nov-%
OM 7.641
<10
4.7
Da-%
I.OM ).2-).8
12.00
6.3
1."
1.273 ].3-].9
19.00
50
FcW
LIMO 7.3-8
19.00
00
My-W
1,130 7.4.6
22.00
90
AW-97
1.108 7.4.8
2500
8.0
May-97
1.242 ].3-].9
26,00
80
Jun-97
1,129 ].1-).6
26.00
90
Jul 97
1.166 6.04.5
NOD
8.0
A ,97
0,931 6.94.5
27.00
67
Bep-97
0.931 70-]3
16.60
6.5
Oq-97
0.791 ).2-].6
12.20
48
Nav-97
0.802 ).YtS
13.10
59
Ne-97
0.962 ).2-]6
12,30
52
1.99
1.272 7.}7,9
19.00
),8
A9e1
LOSS
18.13
6A
Mu
1.399
27.00
9.(
SM
0,713
2A0
31
IMMOVAL PATES: m
Pes.
IMuan1 Average -
F.Oluan] Avenge -
?InII Pn n,rwl 01 rva
9
53
02
I.
2.1
t.od<
5.
5.od<
IOxd
< loOd
M6
$.
4.2
ON
1
lAd
< sod<
5.
S.
< mod
10.
92.
5.
2
C
Q
1
0.3
5.od<
5.
5.
to.
10.
126A
5.
5.1
0.2
LIN
Ol
2.5
< 21d
Zo
1 3,001
< 25.
< OA
< 1n.
0.9
69A
36.
< 5.
20
< 1.5
6.
0.2
12.2
0.3
<I
c 2.
< i5d
l2.
5.
< 0.1
< ln.
1.
43.
I3.
< S.
1
5.1
03
4.5
0.
2.
< 1.
11.
< 5.<
0.1
< M
1.
O.
< 2.5
< S.
< 2,
5.
<O.5
].
06
5.
< 1.
Il.
< 5.
0.2
< 10.
23
68.
< 25.
5.
5.
5,
0.
1
04
2.
1
5.
< 5.
0.1
< 10-
1.
55.
21.
5.
< 2.
).
Ll
3.
03
23
< 1.
< 5.
5.
0.1
c ION1.
48.
66.
5.
1.5
).
0.
2]
O d
Q
< 2.5
< 5_
5.
S
0A
< 25.
< 2.
42.
< 25.
< 0
2.5
64
1.4
33
03
2.5
< 1.
< 5.
< 5.
0.1
< 10.
2.
49.
< 25.
< Z.
1.
6.0
0.8
9.6
1.11
54.0
< 3.5 1
< 1. II
< 5. 11
< 11
5.<
0.1
I
< 10.
2.1
Si
< 25.
< 25,
1.
5.11
< 2A1
< ION
c 10.0E
< 0.20
< 14.0
8.
LI
5.1
1.7
< 5.
92.
74
< 50.
60
0.8
4A
1.7
5.0
c IN
< ION
19.01
< 0.20
< 20,0
< 5.
83.
]1.
< 50.
< 0.
3.0
LI
10,
2.9
5.00
< IN
59.00
65.00<
IN
100
< 5.
128.
IIO.
S.
5.
305
1.2
10.25
1.7
IN
< 10.00
< 10,00
< 20.0
84.
99.
10.
31
1.51].1
1.5
2.00
< 10 Otl
< 10.00
<10
a M
580
10,
291
0]J
1.
IS
5.0
< 20
< 10.0
< 2.0
< 10.0
< OX
< 5.
5.
R.0
< 500
< 10.0
0.
5.5
3.
2.1
2
< 10.
10.
IL
< 20.
109.
< 10.
5.0
13
4.7
1.
10.
< 10.
< 10.
)0,
< 10.
].
13
3.
0.3
2.
10.
IQ
< 200
< 20.0
47.5
< 10.
5.
53
0.]
SI
1.1
54
N S
it
11.
p 9.61
U.9
0
p IM
t15, 2
)0.
166
U.5
2.61
N 2
8.
1.5
122
2.
A
N 5.
X 5.
59.
p M.
N 50.
N 2.
N 25.
M 5.
IM
p 110.
50.
N 5.
M
2.91
0.2
1.2
O3
25
a 1.
5.
N 1.
N 2.5
0.1
N
N 5.
N 0.
p 23
10110 ab
MAR 3 1 1Q9111
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
Cleylan HeeCwwka Ma'y[is 9wpYe46Y�1aI'SJ. Sy R/�
6emµa96ymien, P^YI Y169B

$919-233-8031 Mc$IN & CREED/RL 04/17/98 10:38 P.001
-
MqKM&CIREED
4e
5625 DILLARD DRIVE
SUITE 117
CARY. N.0- 27511
TEL (919) 23M091
FAX: [phone]
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
DESIGNATED RECIPIENT: IrmFAX NO: = q'
COMPANY: = DATE:
SENDER: TIME:
TIME:
NUMBER 01= TRANSMISSION PAGES (Including this page)_ -7
PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME
THIS IS YOUR ORIGINAL HARD CO Y TO FOLLOW
COMMENTS: - - IF Wr CORREMyRECEMD OR PAGES FAULTY. PLEASE CALL SEINVER Ar91,1 "
REMARKS_
?r.1.4.-
-- ATTEf MON
'ME **6WATION CONTAINEO IN THIS FACSM9LE MFSSACE IS PRMLEGEO AND C0XF1OENrwL tWORMA7roH INTENDED QMY FOR us[ or Tnt uvDWVAL oR
ENMY NAMED ABOVE tF THE READER OF THIS ME53AGE IS NOY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT. OR iNE EMPLOYEE ONOR AGENT RESIP W43MLE TO DELNEH 1T TO YHE
U47ENMD RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTlr-XEO THAT ANY DISSENNAitOKOMMOU ION OR CGFYMU yr I Mt* MMMVK*AY*K SrRIMY rFt*Kmnt% ZF vav
HAVE REGE9VED INS COWMMCATION N ERROR PLEASE KOstFY US BY TELEPHONE AND ft- jRN D i[ ORIGINILL MESSAGE TO US A r THE ABOVE ADORM IRA YK
US fo$TILL SFRV= %W WILL RENBURSE YOU FOR AMY COSTS WCVRRFo
REV -02

V919-233-8031 HcKIif & CREED/RL 04/17,198 10:38 P.002
NKIdM&CREED
October 24,1996
evc�n�s Ms. Judy Garrett
NCDEM Regional Office
`' Os 3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Fxtmcrs Raleigh,North Carolina 27609
F,N RE: Clayton Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements
Division I - Wastewater Treatment Facilities
SRF Project No. GS370431-03
Dear Ms_ Garrett:
11.OR(70)
This is to certify that to the best of our knowledge the Wastewa r.Treatment
Plant Improvements for the Division I contract have been omplGtod in
substantial compliance with the contract documents. All punch list items have
be
en corrected and this system is in operation in accordance wlrh the design
criteria.
Sincerely,
McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS, PA
B n F. Blake, P.E-
roject Engineer
SWE IV cc: Ralph A. ClarK, Town Manager
James Warren - Public Works Director
Amy Simes - OEM -Construction Grants and Loans
File
&7.5 CLPAMROA
CAW, NC 27511
PI ONE9191233-Ml
FIX QW0.33.5031
tlMm�a5w111CLFAICPL101]eb01 tr/tR102d5ME.dac

'0919-233-8031
1icKItr & CREED/RL 04/17,198 10:38 P.003
1VcMM&CREM
October24, 1996
Ms. Judy Garrett
NCDEM Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Axuaw s _ Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
rswNec RE: Clayton Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements
Division 11- Wastewater Treatment Facilities
SRF Project No. C5370431-03
cnRv. W-27511
try r<91912N awl
f AX 919/73MC31
Dear Ms. Garrett
This is to certify that to the best of our knowledge the Wastov
Plant improvements for the Division II contract have beer
substantial compliance with the contract documents_ All punch
been corrected and this system is in operation in accordance
criteria.
Sincerely,
McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS, P.A.
BF. Blake, P.E.
P Eject Engineer
fgr
Gu; Ralph A. Clark, Town Manager
James Warren - Public Works Director
Amy Simes-,DEM-Construction Grants and Loans
File
iNIC�RALlVIX.1lfa,pilCAtO136`A011 V V.1 mneao.00�
1.OR(70)
ator Treatment
completed in
st items have
rith the design

'$`919-20a-8091 MCKIat & CREKD/RL
04/17,198 10:39 P.009
� MqQM&CREID
May 22, 1996 M&C 9
eWIKUl s
an VEYM Ms. Judy Garrett
NCDEM Regional Office
ATE 3 3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
FU4M+5 Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
RE: Clayton Wastewater Treatment Plant 1993 Improvements
Division III - Effluent Force Main and Outfoll
SRF Project # C070431-03
Dear Ms_ Garrett:
This is to certify that to the best of our knowledge the Wastewc
Plant Improvements for the Division III contract have been
substantial compliance with the contract documents. All puncht
been corrected and this system is in operation in accordance w
criteria.
Sincerely,
McKIM & CREED ENGINEERS, P.A.
Brya Blake, P.E.
Project Engineer
SW 9 117
cc: Amy Simes. DEM - Construction Grants and Loans
euuDM I Lee Smith,. Town of Clayton
W5 DFU, Ralph A. Clark, Town of Clayton
File
CAN. NC 9,7511
PHONE [phone]-M1
rnr.9191233-SUM
q;V3=1MW522Cbb2d.c
136-0011.OR
r Treatment
Dmpleted in
Items have
i the design

'0919-233-8091 HcKI11 & CREED/RL 04/17,198 10:99 P.005
DOUGLA$A_McCORMAC
MCI-
JODY L. MCLSOD
Mayo,Pro ran
BALM A.Q.ARK
Tam mwwar
QARYRAGLAND
Tame Aamwy
JESSICA COZTiU, afzC
To cr.k
Town of Clayton
F. Green
S. Johnson
H. Lipscomb
2ron Mercer
October 28, 1996
Mr. John R. Blowe, Chief
Construction Grants and Loans Section
NC Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-053.5
Re: 1993 Clayton Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improvements Project - Division I
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
SRF Project No. CS370431-03
Dear Mr. Blowe;
This letter is to inform your office that the Division T
contract of the project has been completed. Substantial c mpletion
was established on April 15, 1996 and May 29, 1996. The Division
T system went into operation on April 15, 1996. The date of final
completion was June 27, 1996.
This notification satisfies the requirement of the ievolving
Loan Program.
Sincere/ly�, �
, llzam''
Ralph A. Clark
Town Manager
RC:jc
cc: James Warren, WWTP Superintendent
Amy Simes, DEM-Construction Grants & Loans
Judy Garrett, DEM-Raleigh Regional Office
Bryan Blake, P.E., McKim & Creed Engineers
P.O. Box 879 • Clayton, North Carolina 27520 9 [phone] 9 FAX (919)

*&919-233-8031
Rp" 1;W;"W9;i� 40;11
04/17,198 10:39 P.006
DOUCLASA.MeCORMAC
Mew
JODY L. McLEOD
MarrPMTa
RALrn AQ.AAK
T� xe-v�
CARYRnG AND
T~ num.x
J=CA 07UCU, QKC
r awe
Town of Clayton
R!ECEI tl
October 28, 1996 OCT 9 O 1
Mr. John R. Blowe, Chief
Construction Grants and Loans Section
NC Division of Environmental Management
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, 14C 27626-0535
Re: 1993 Clayton Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improvements Project - Division II
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
SRF Project No. CS370431-03
Dear Mr. Blowe:
This letter is to inform your office that the Di
contract of the project has been completed. Substantial c
was established on April 15, 1996 and May 29, 1996. The
II system.went into operation on April 15, 1996. The date
Completion was J11ne 27, 1996.
This notification satisfies the requirement of the
Loan Program.
Sincerely,
*PA k
Town Manager
RC:jC
cc: James Warren, WWTP Superintendent
Amy Simes, DEN -Construction Grants & Loans
Judy Garrett, DEM-Raleigh Regional Office
--Sryan Blake, P.E „ McKim & Creed Engineers
P.O. Box 879 a Clayton, North Carolina 27520 9 (919) 553r5866 • FAX (919)
m
E. Green
S.iohnson
H. Lipscomb
non Mercer
•ision II
unpletion
Division
of final
ving

r $919-233-8031
' 'SER=E'
ELECMIC SERVICE
(919),53-16M
VrMCLE MAINTENANCE
(919) 553-15W
McSIR & CnED/RL 04/17/ 98
TOWN OF CLAYTON
OPERATIONS CENTER
c
Tuesday, May 2Li, 1996
Mr. John R. Blowe, Chief
Construction C"srants and Doan Section
INCDE 1
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh.. -NO 27626-0535
RE: 1993 CTAYTON WASTEWATER _JL MTM"NT PLANT
H"FROYEMENTS PROJECT
I MSION IR - EFFLUENT FORCE MAIN AND 'O T AI.
SRF PROJECT. #lCS370431-03
bear �ir.131o�re:
'Phis letter is to inform your office that the Division III contract of the Project
completed. Substantial Completion was established on January 22, 1996 and
Dkision III system went into operation on March 22, 1996.
'i'his notification satisfies the requirement of the Revolving Loan ProgrAm.
Sincerely,
Ralph Clark
Town Manager
oc: Lcc Smith, Public Works Director
Amy Simes, DEM-Construction Grants & Loans
Judy Gaffett, DEM-Raleigh Rcgqonal Office
Bryan Bloke, McKim & Creed
L0:40 P.007
'ENVIRONMENT~
PUBLIC WORKS
(91 9) 553-1530
WATER RECLAMATION
(919) 553-i535
MAY 9 01996
been
_
653 Highway 42 Wes
,. y •. + O box 579 • Clayton, NC 27520 » Phcne: -[phone] • cox: (919) 553.15A 1
.