310630_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200910

Od
:Division of Water Resources 13IM 5 —
Facility Number 3 - 3o O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: C��o//mpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: C37Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: - 'ate Arrival Time: aH► Departure Time: County: Region: vim_
Farm Name: Nova" US�w Owner Email:
Owner Name: I En 11 )({lE'g_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Lf a f , Uc her Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer I ::::]
Non -Layer
Design Current
nry Pni ltry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes ❑ No ZNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[—]-Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[YNA ❑ NE
21�A ❑ NE
2'NA ❑ NE
[KNA ❑ NE
[RTA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[17f NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
EeNA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ag
5. Are there any, immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses -an immediate public health or en ironmental threat, notify DWR
7.' Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?] Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No, gNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No [j(NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No [GA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes ❑ No Ej NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NoFD/NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [:]No [YNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [:]No
E�/NA ❑ NE
QXA ❑ NE
VA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

V
°t't°,
Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: -�0- a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes,;rtNo R� NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes _R'No �(NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No UNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [:]No [j�NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No VNA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
[,-I,'VA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes
❑ No
[p'NTA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
[P11NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any_additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5?(NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
FZ141A
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2'<1A
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain.situations (use additional pages as necessary).
5 ps.—l�'��• . :
Lor�� +CeeS i�e wc.lI, Chec_l� Qurnn w
��C d & 1�, co, j� cr�se�l, ah�� �c1�� fas- rl 'e.
o4 es M�5+ 6_ CU cl;,�e will• consU w/ S'o�<<t IN-,4r 'Fe r
�h�irce-N �� (ry ida�
lA
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a�i N T E.d2rL�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:OtNa` [sa3
Date: f' 10-aaa.0
Page 3 of 3
21412015