310112_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200910

O Division of Water Resources'
Facility Number " 3„— 1 a O Division .,of Soil and'Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: W
pliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O ReferraI O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: - o aoa Arrival Time: Departure Time: 0 ari, County: Region: W
Farm Name: �� MF ex t-*(Lmg -1-^C' Owner Email:
Owner Name: C ]nC�se ms'e� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: C"5 Mo►eJkE�
Certified Operator:o.�e Me c
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: ,` t_ ero�
Certification Number: T% j� OT
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current. r Design' Current " : " Deesign. Current
Swine Capacity ° Pop. . "Wet Poultry ` ° Capacity , Pop. Cattle" Capacity ` Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
d 0
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other "
Layer
Non -Layer
Design . Current
Dry,Poultry, - ` Capacity Po . v
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Pouets
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
O/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[ 1� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there an observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Y
❑ Yes
Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
_
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 1' Date of Inspection: `- ,&-�j
Waste Collection &'treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [5jr No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [—]Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes P/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
R<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
E <o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ,❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
ElYes [�
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L>4 NT
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes WNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 .21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: --.10-oZ(�ao
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? { ❑iYes [fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5?(NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
�To
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
[;(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application).
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[/ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
EeNNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
— FJ"^o;► ` (hoS� Cece c.1- S'o 1 f6r;,PJe 5 othoL Co,M p) 2 feI1�12- 01' S Tar Zo1�lE
A ' 4'n-?krr7(�5,tl�nr.lo/
Pace e� �� Plus to iwb�C dti wall.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: j 0 Nw Pt r iLl Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��1 Date: C�_ to
Page 3 of 3 V 21412015