310680_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200925

Ol'Divisimi of Water Resources
Facility Number ° ®- O Division of Soil and Water Co°nservatiom
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 7Routine
pliance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: "a Arrival Time:
/'aQ4 Departure Time: County: �i h Region:��
Farm Name: W S MWIT K-" S I" kpxg 0,3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: w5 I r l A j'P►TZM S Nc Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: N(, (b^ tJ R1112CI S
Certified Operator: I lOAV 1 S J"U T -T-0. 0
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current.
-Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
° Other, '
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: R 49 Lt-^
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Desiign` Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design, ° Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design, 'Current
°Cattle° Capacity Pop,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
T ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes; notify DWR)
g
❑ Yes
[ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? -
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - jDate of Inspection: C1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VT ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes FR/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): Q q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:]Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? -
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment 1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �j(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [alwo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
[J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
YNO
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
FY/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [:�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - O Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes' E24 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes FB<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels,
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes, ❑ No [glTA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [ 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes V/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes--F�/o ❑ NA 2 NE
'S q-ac'-Zo
❑ Yes
[�J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[g'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[l/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
rert-r_* '_+Cd4 fa %O—i`%9
iry MA" & &✓10 WAIVM
Reviewer/InspectorName: —fal-y') 11.rt y Phone: b19 61'1-9M
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412015