310352_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200925

Qo Division of Water'Resources° --
Facility Number-:3 3'S'Z O Division of Soil and Water. Conservation m
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: C�o/mpliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (D Routine O Complaint O- Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:. -_;... County: ' /;r► Region: h%yRt
Farm Name: J J NJ Owner Email:
Owner Name: jt_,-4v-1 jimtS Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: :Phone:
Onsite Representative: &/p f}*4
Certified Operator: �60'1 —IDMt S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other. .
Other
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
° Dcsign ' Current Design Current 4 Design .Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.. ° Cattle Capacity:, Pop.`
Layer
Non -Layer
Other
Poults
Design Current
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[ja'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
U/No .
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
[:]Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
gl*N" o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yesi�<o`
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: —a�5 -a 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes `5]'*No 0 NA ❑ NE
T:
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:_ 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): i In 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes , 1' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) f
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [VJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application -
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 52(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Types):<
—r•
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP9-
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
Ef No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[?(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 9,No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes DKNo
❑ Yes [ff"No
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [J�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes FTI,�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE

Facility Number: a I - Date of Inspection: =oLS—aa
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ONE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑'Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No dNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes M/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA J2�NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Yes [2/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
etude �,,eek�`� S°ck�`"l;t��i �e cacdS'
Tf e e w-,i
(mow. sfcd ��ccw�
�ri o.C�iVt I gSoi
'durlh , S Pro(�S$
G� +rce
P �a.ee
c r�►a �cc r A r Saw. 0. S fog s', ble
C
_' S a � L �� ry. P1� W p�. s �► �' a � 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: 02 102 � a -_ I5-�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q — a T—P eao
Page 3 of 3 �� 21412015